Military History Anniversaries 1 Thru 15 July

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Military History Anniversaries 1 Thru 15 July Military History Anniversaries 1 thru 15 July Events in History over the next 15 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests JUL 00 1940 – U.S. Army: 1st Airborne Unit » In 1930, the U.S. Army experimented with the concept of parachuting three-man heavy-machine-gun teams. Nothing came of these early experiments. The first U.S. airborne unit began as a test platoon formed from part of the 29th Infantry Regiment, in July 1940. The platoon leader was 1st Lieutenant William T. Ryder, who made the first jump on August 16, 1940 at Lawson Field, Fort Benning, Georgia from a B-18 Bomber. He was immediately followed by Private William N. King, the first enlisted soldier to make a parachute jump. Although airborne units were not popular with the top U.S. Armed Forces commanders, President Franklin D. Roosevelt sponsored the concept, and Major General William C. Lee organized the first paratroop platoon. On a tour of Europe he had first observed the revolutionary new German airborne forces which he believed the U.S. Army should adopt. This led to the Provisional Parachute Group, and then the United States Army Airborne Command. General Lee was the first commander at the new parachute school at Fort Benning, in west-central Georgia. The U.S. Armed Forces regards Major General William C. Lee as the father of the Airborne. The first U.S. combat jump was near Oran, Algeria, in North Africa on November 8, 1942, conducted by elements of the 2nd Battalion, 509th Parachute Infantry Regiment. Tragically, he would never see his hard work and planning come to fruition. On February 4, 1944 he suffered a heart attack and would never see his "Screaming Eagles" jump into Normandy. In his honor, the soldiers of the 101st Airborne shouted "Bill Lee" instead of Geronimo as they dropped from planes onto the beaches of Normandy. Jul 01 1775 – Native Americans: Congress Resolves to Forge Indian Alliances » The Continental Congress resolves to recruit Indian nations to the American side in their dispute with the British, should the British take native allies of their own. The motion read: “That in case any Agent of the ministry, shall induce the Indian tribes, or any of them to commit actual hostilities against these colonies, or to enter into an offensive Alliance with the British troops, thereupon the colonies ought to avail themselves of an Alliance with such Indian Nations as will enter into the same, to oppose such British troops and their Indian Allies.” Few “such Indians Nations” saw any advantage to joining the Patriot cause. Rather, they saw Great Britain as their last defense against the encroaching land-hungry European settlers into their ancestral territory. Racist settlers managed to undermine any residual trust remaining in the Native American population during the revolution by committing atrocities such as the massacre of neutral, Christian 1 | P a g e Indian women and children at prayer in Gnaddenhutten, Pennsylvania, in 1778. In another example, a Continental officer undermined his own cause with the murder of Cornplanter, a Shawnee leader and Patriot ally, in 1777. Cornplanter At the close of the War for Independence, the Patriots’ few Indian allies received worse treatment at the hands of their supposed allies than natives who had sided with Britain. Having promised Continental soldiers land in return for their service, Congress seized land from its Indian allies in order to cede it to officers on the verge of mutiny in 1783. Jul 01 1782 – American Revolution: Raid on Lunenburg, Nova Scotia » Occurred when the U.S. privateer, Captain Noah Stoddard of Fairhaven, Massachusetts, and four other privateer vessels attacked the British settlement at Lunenburg. In Nova Scotia, Canada the assault was the most spectacular raid of the war and the last major privateer attack on a Nova Scotia community. Lunenburg was defended by militia leaders Colonel John Creighton and Major Dettlieb Christopher Jessen. On the morning of 1 JUL Stoddard led approximately 170 US privateers in four heavily armed vessels and overpowered Lunenburg’s defense, capturing the blockhouses and burning Creighton's home and filling Jessen's house with bullets holes. The privateers then looted the settlement and kept the militia at bay with the threat of destroying the entire town. The American privateers plundered the town and took three prisoners, including Creighton, who were later released from Boston without a ransom having been paid. Jul 01 1862 – Civil War: Battle of Booneville, MS » Occurred in the aftermath of the Union victory at the Battle of Shiloh and within the context of Confederate General Braxton Bragg's efforts to recapture the rail junction at Corinth, Mississippi, 20 miles north of Booneville. After the Union Army victory at Shiloh, Maj. Gen. Henry W. Halleck moved his forces slowly toward Corinth, an important rail center. By 25 MAY after traveling 5 miles in three weeks, Halleck was positioned to lay siege to the town. But on 29 MAY, the Confederate forces under General P.G.T. 2 | P a g e Beauregard slipped away undetected and moved toward Tupelo, Mississippi. In late June, Halleck ordered his forces south and learned that the Confederates, by then under Bragg, were advancing toward Corinth. The 31-year-old Union Col. Philip Sheridan established a fortified position to the south at Booneville on 28 JUN to await the Confederate attack. Lead elements of 4,700 troops under the Confederate Brig. Gen. James R. Chalmers encountered Sheridan's pickets on the morning of 1 JUL, three and 1.8 miles to the southwest of Corinth. The pickets fell back and established a sound defensive line at the intersection of the roads from Tupelo and Saltillo. Aided by the superiority of their new Colt revolving rifles, the line withstood the initial Confederate assault before withdrawing to a backup position 2 miles closer to the town. Chalmers' effort to turn the left flank of this new line was thwarted when Sheridan's main force joined the battle. The bulk of the Union force stayed on the defensive while Sheridan sent the 2nd Michigan Cavalry under Capt. Russell Alexander and the 2nd Iowa Cavalry under Lt. Col. Edward Hatch to attack the Confederate rear and left flank, respectively. The cavalry forces pushed Chalmers to retreat and Sheridan called off the pursuit after 4 miles when his fatigued troops encountered swampy terrain. Sheridan estimated that Chalmers lost 65 troops killed in the battle; Federal casualties were one dead, 24 wounded, and 16 missing. Due to the battle, Bragg delayed his offensive strategy for Corinth, allowing Halleck additional time to unite his troops. Jul 01 1862 – Civil War: The Battle of Malvern Hill [Poindexter's Farm], Virginia » The final battle in the Seven Days Campaign, part of George B. McClellan's Peninsula Campaign. It was fought between the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia, led by Robert E. Lee, and the Union Army of the Potomac under George B. McClellan. He was not present for the initial exchanges of the battle, having boarded the ironclad USS Galena and sailed down the James River to inspect Harrison's Landing, where he intended to locate the base for his army. Confederate preparations were hindered by several mishaps. Bad maps and faulty guides caused Confederate Maj. Gen. John Magruder to be late for the battle, an excess of caution delayed Maj. Gen. Benjamin Huger, and Maj. Gen. Stonewall Jackson had problems collecting the Confederate artillery. The battle took place on the 130-foot elevation of Malvern Hill, near the Confederate capital of Richmond. Including inactive reserves, more than 50,000 soldiers from each side took part, using more than 200 pieces of artillery. The Union's V Corps, commanded by Fitz John Porter, took up positions on the hill on 30 JUN. The battle occurred in stages: over the course of four hours a series of blunders in planning and communication caused Lee's forces to launch three failed frontal infantry assaults across hundreds of yards of open ground, unsupported by Confederate artillery, charging toward strongly entrenched Union infantry and artillery. These errors provided Union forces with an opportunity to inflict heavy casualties. In each phase, the effectiveness of the Federal artillery was the deciding factor, repulsing attack after attack, resulting in a tactical Union victory. After the battle, McClellan and his forces withdrew from Malvern Hill to Harrison's Landing, where he remained until 16 AUG. His plan to capture Richmond had been thwarted in the course of four hours. In the aftermath of the battle, however, the Confederate press heralded Lee as the savior of Richmond. In stark contrast, McClellan was accused of being absent from the battlefield, a harsh criticism that haunted him when he ran for president in 1864. Casualties and losses: US 2,100 - CSA 5,650. 3 | P a g e Jul 01 1863 – Civil War: The Battle of Gettysburg Begins » The largest military conflict in North American history begins this day when Union and Confederate forces collide at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The epic battle lasted three days and resulted in a retreat to Virginia by Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia ending his northward advancement. Two months prior to Gettysburg, Lee had dealt a stunning defeat to the Army of the Potomac at Chancellorsville, Virginia. He then made plans for a Northern invasion in order to relieve pressure on war-weary Virginia and to seize the initiative from the Yankees. His army, numbering about 80,000, began moving on June 3. The Army of the Potomac, commanded by Joseph Hooker and numbering just under 100,000, began moving shortly thereafter, staying between Lee and Washington, D.C.
Recommended publications
  • Steven H. Newton KURSK the GERMAN VIEW
    TRANSLATED, EDITED, AND ANNOTATED WITH NEW MATERIAL BY Steven H. Newton KURSK THE GERMAN VIEW Eyewitness Reports of Operation Citadel by the German Commanders Translated, edited, and annotated by Steven H. Newton DA CAPO PRESS A Member of the Perseus Books Group Copyright © 2002 by Steven H. Newton All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Designed by Brent Wilcox Cataloging-in-Publication data for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN 0-306-81150-2 Published by Da Capo Press A Member of the Perseus Books Group http://www.dacapopress.com Da Capo Press books are available at special discounts for bulk purchases in the U.S. by corporations, institutions, and other organizations. For more information, please contact the Special Markets Department at the Perseus Books Group, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, or call (617) 252-5298. 12345678 9—05 04 03 02 CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix Introduction xi PART 1 Strategic Analysis of Operation Citadel Eyewitness Accounts by German Commanders 1 Operation Citadel Overview by General of Infantry Theodor Busse APPENDIX 1A German Military Intelligence and Soviet Strength, July 1943 27 Armeeabteilung Kempf 29 by Colonel General Erhard Raus APPENDIX 2A Order of Battle: Corps Raus (Special Employment), 2 March 1943 58 APPENDIX
    [Show full text]
  • Linea Gotica
    Linea Gotica Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera Linea Gotica Parte della campagna d'Italia della seconda guerra mondiale La Linea Gotica nell'agosto 1944. In blu le manovre alleate Data 25 agosto 1944 - 21 aprile 1945 Luogo Appennino tosco-emiliano e riviera adriatica tra Fano e Rimini Esito Sfondamento Alleato della linea e successivo collasso delle forze tedesche in Italia Schieramenti Regno Unito Germania • Canada Repubblica Sociale • Nuova Italiana Zelanda • Sudafrica • India britannica Stati Uniti d'America Francia libera Polonia Regno d'Italia Brasile Grecia Comandanti Comandanti delle armate Comandanti gruppo in Italia - 15° Army armate C[3][2] Group:[1][2] Albert Kesselring Harold Alexander Heinrich von fino nov. '44 poi Vietinghoff Mark Clark Comandanti della 10ª Comandanti dell'8ª armata: armata: Heinrich von Oliver Leese fino Vietinghoff sett. '44 poi Joachim Lemelsen[4] Richard McCreery Traugott Herr Comandanti della 5ª Comandanti della 14ª armata: armata: Mark Clark fino nov. Joachim Lemelsen '44 poi Fridolin von Senger Lucian K. Truscott und Etterlin Heinz Ziegler Traugott Herr Kurt von Tippelskirch Joachim Lemelsen Comandanti dell'Armata Liguria: Rodolfo Graziani Effettivi 8ª armata britannica 10ª armata tedesca 5ª armata statunitense 14ª armata tedesca Armata Liguria Perdite tra 26 agosto e il 7 tra 26 agosto e il 7 ottobre: ottobre: 30.000 uomini di cui 42.000 uomini (stima oltre 4.500 canadesi del generale (stima del generale Alexander) Alexander) circa 60.000 civili italiani La Linea Gotica (in tedesco Gotenstellung, in inglese Gothic Line) fu la linea difensiva istituita dal feldmaresciallo tedesco Albert Kesselring nel 1944 nel tentativo di rallentare l'avanzata dell'esercito alleato comandato dal generale Harold Alexander verso il nord Italia.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Navies As Seen by the United States Navy, 1910-2010
    Commonwealth Navies as Seen by the United States Navy, 1910-2010 John B. Hattendorf1 Aux États-Unis, les perspectives sur les marines du Commonwealth au cours du siècle passé ont varié, car les Américains ont considéré la question en termes de contextes différents. Au départ, certains officiers clairvoyants de la Marine américaine, tels A.T. Mahan et W.S. Sims, ont vu le potentiel de d’entente et de coopération entre les marines « anglo- saxonnes ». Pendant la même période, les forces navales du Commonwealth ont joué un rôle dans la planification de guerre navale américaine. Avant les années 1930, beaucoup de ces plans ont été vus comme des tests de capacité de la Marine américaine contre une puissance à peu près égale et, donc, sur le plan académique ont illustré le rôle de la puissance navale, mais néanmoins ont révélé des vues intéressantes sur les marines du Commonwealth. Avec l’avènement de la seconde guerre mondiale, les relations navales ont changé de façon spectaculaire, en tant que la Marine américaine a travaillé en étroite collaboration avec les forces britanniques et du Commonwealth pour combattre l’ennemi commun. Cela a continué jusqu’à la période de la guerre froide avec des alliances de défense avec l’OTAN et autres. Cette entente persiste avec l’actuelle « stratégie maritime coopérative pour le 21e siècle » des États-Unis. In 1977, Professor Robin Winks of Yale University famously observed that, “Americans cannot understand their own history without understanding Canadian history. Conversely, Canadians cannot understand
    [Show full text]
  • Region 8 Student Branches
    Student Branches in R8 with Counselor & Chair contact August 2015 Par SPO Name SPO Name SPO ID Officers Full Name Officers Email Address Position Start Date Desc Austria Section Graz Technische Univ STB40401 Chair Michael Tieber 02/10/2014 [email protected] Counselor Michael Muhr 07/01/1994 [email protected] Johannes Kepler University STB28721 Chair Stefan Clara 11/20/2014 [email protected] Linz Counselor Bernhard H Jakoby 02/29/2008 [email protected] University of Klagenfurt SB STB12111 Chair Adam Erdelyi 01/28/2015 [email protected] Counselor Wilfried Elmenreich 11/09/2012 [email protected] Upper Austria Univ Of Applied STB65651 Chair Thomas Kroesswang- 06/01/2011 [email protected] Science - Wels Ridler Counselor Mario P Jungwirth 03/20/2007 [email protected] Wien Technische Universitat- STB03691 Chair Veronika Hager 01/01/2010 [email protected] Vienna Sb Counselor C 11/08/2006 [email protected] MECKLENBRAEUKER Bahrain Section University of Bahrain SB STB36161 Chair Bassem Tariq ElMeleegy 04/01/2015 [email protected] Counselor MOHAB A MANGOUD 05/05/2015 [email protected] Belarus Section Belarusian State Univ STB61961 Chair Aliaksei Aliaksandravich 05/01/2013 [email protected] Kuzmin Counselor Vladimir M Lutkovski 01/01/2002 [email protected] Benelux Section Catholique Univ of Louvain STB03631 Chair Ludovic Moreau 02/15/2015 [email protected] SB Counselor Christophe Craeye 06/27/2008 [email protected] Delft Univ of Tech SB STB00511 Chair Sergio Luis Santos 11/01/2011
    [Show full text]
  • A War of Reputation and Pride
    A War of reputation and pride - An examination of the memoirs of German generals after the Second World War. HIS 4090 Peter Jørgen Sager Fosse Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History University of Oslo Spring 2019 1 “For the great enemy of truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest -- but the myth -- persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.” – John F. Kennedy, 19621 1John F. Kennedy, Yale University Commencement Address, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkyalecommencement.htm, [01.05.2019]. 2 Acknowledgments This master would not have been written without the help and support of my mother, father, friends and my better half, thank you all for your support. I would like to thank the University Library of Oslo and the British Library in London for providing me with abundant books and articles. I also want to give huge thanks to the Military Archive in Freiburg and their employees, who helped me find the relevant materials for this master. Finally, I would like to thank my supervisor at the University of Oslo, Professor Kim Christian Priemel, who has guided me through the entire writing process from Autumn 2017. Peter Jørgen Sager Fosse, Oslo, 01.05.2019 3 Contents: Introduction………………………………………………………………………...………... 7 Chapter 1, Theory and background………………………………………………..………17 1.1 German Military Tactics…………………………………………………..………. 17 1.1.1 Blitzkrieg, Kesselschlacht and Schwerpunkt…………………………………..……. 17 1.1.2 Examples from early campaigns……………………………………………..……… 20 1.2 The German attack on the USSR (1941)……………………………..…………… 24 1.2.1 ‘Vernichtungskrieg’, war of annihilation………………………………...………….. 24 1.2.2 Operation Barbarossa………………………………………………..……………… 28 1.2.3 Operation Typhoon…………………………………………………..………………. 35 1.2.4 The strategic situation, December 1941…………………………….……………….
    [Show full text]
  • Global Encounters and the Archives Global Encounters a Nd the Archives
    1 Global Encounters and the Archives Global EncountErs a nd thE archivEs Britain’s Empire in the Age of Horace Walpole (1717–1797) An exhibition at the Lewis Walpole Library, Yale University October 20, 2017, through March 2, 2018 Curated by Justin Brooks and Heather V. Vermeulen, with Steve Pincus and Cynthia Roman Foreword On this occasion of the 300th anniversary of Horace In association with this exhibition the library Walpole’s birthday in 2017 and the 100th anniversary will sponsor a two-day conference in New Haven of W.S. Lewis’s Yale class of 2018, Global Encounters on February 9–10, 2018, that will present new and the Archives: Britain’s Empire in the Age of Horace archival-based research on Britain’s global empire Walpole embraces the Lewis Walpole Library’s central in the long eighteenth century and consider how mission to foster eighteenth-century studies through current multi-disciplinary methodologies invite research in archives and special collections. Lewis’s creative research in special collections. bequest to Yale was informed by his belief that “the cynthia roman most important thing about collections is that they Curator of Prints, Drawings and Paintings furnish the means for each generation to make its The Lewis Walpole Library own appraisals.”1 The rich resources, including manuscripts, rare printed texts, and graphic images, 1 W.S. Lewis, Collector’s Progress, 1st ed. (New York: indeed provide opportunity for scholars across Alfred A. Knopf, 1951), 231. academic disciplines to explore anew the complexities and wide-reaching impact of Britain’s global interests in the long eighteenth century Global Encounters and the Archives is the product of a lively collaboration between the library and Yale faculty and graduate students across academic disci- plines.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews Criticism Editors
    Criticism Volume 19 | Issue 3 Article 5 1977 Book Reviews Criticism Editors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism Recommended Citation Editors, Criticism (1977) "Book Reviews," Criticism: Vol. 19: Iss. 3, Article 5. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/vol19/iss3/5 to Book Reviews Karl Marx and World Literature by S. S. Prawer. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 197.6. Pp. xii + 446. $19.50. As "orthodox" Anglo-Saxon criticism continues to run out of intellectual capital, some more ambitious, systematic and comprehensive critical method seems increasingly in demand. Of the various candidates for this role­ structuralism, Marxism, semiotics, stylistics, psychoanalysis and the like­ Marxism is currently enjoying rather a good press. In the United States, there is the work of men like Fredric Jameson and Stephen Morawski, as well as the increasingly potent intervention of the Marxist Literary Group; in Britain, the para-Marxist writings of Raymond Williams have influenced (if. only, on occasions, by critical reaction) a growing band of younger, quasi-Althusserian aestheticians who look anxiously to Europe for a literary science which might supplant their own dismal native heritage of myopic empiricism. In all of this, Marx's own writings on literature h~ve a critical, if not central, importance. And there have been some valuable compendia of such work: .Mikhail Lifshitz's classical compilation of Marx and Engels on literature and art, for example, or, more peripherally, Peter Demetz's deeply tendentious Marx, Engels and the Poets. More recently, Lee Baxandall and Stephan Morawski have provided us with a convenient, if curiously organised, record of Marx and Engels's literary comments, in the first volume of the projected DOMA series (Documents on Marxist Aesthetics).
    [Show full text]
  • A Civil War Christmas: Digital Dramaturgy
    A Civil War Christmas: Digital Dramaturgy By Paula Vogel Directed by Rebecca Taichman Choreographed by Liz Lerman Nov 19–Dec 22, 2013 Source: Dramaturg Drew Barker, Program Notes Place: Washington, D.C., and along the Potomac River Time: Christmastime, near the end of the Civil War 1. Washington DC in 1864 Viewing the skyline of the nation’s capital in late 1864 one would still be able to recognize the grand symbols of the city. The Capitol dome was finished the previous December, and the Smithsonian Castle completed since 1855. The Patent Office Building (which would eventually house the National Portrait Gallery and American Art Museum) towered over its neighbors and the White House stood as we see it today sans West and East Wings. After the war began the population which could be seen on the streets of the capital boomed from 63,000 to at times as many as 200,000 while soldiers, bureaucrats, laborers, merchants, prostitutes, doctors, and contraband slaves flooded into the city. The majority of the roads, however, were dirt or mud depending upon the weather. The Evening Star reported on December 24, 1864 that “the Potomac River is still covered with ice and the channels are frozen over.” The District’s newspaper went on to describe how a mail boat was caught in the ice and the passengers had to walk ashore, after which an attempt by tugboat to dislodge the vessel proved unsuccessful. 2. Lincoln’s White House Source: Mr. Lincoln’s White House Historical Database http://mrlincolnswhitehouse.org/ In Springfield, where the Lincolns had lived for the previous two decades, the Lincoln family had trouble keeping a single servant girl to help Mary Todd Lincoln.
    [Show full text]
  • 36Th & 51St VA Infantry Engagements with Civil War Chronology, 1860
    Grossclose Brothers in Arms: 36th and 51st Virginia Infantry Engagements with a Chronology of the American Civil War, 1860-1865 Engagements 36th VA Infantry 51st VA Infantry (HC Grossclose, Co G-2nd) (AD & JAT Grossclose, Co F) Civil War Chronology November 1860 6 Lincoln elected. December 1860 20 South Carolina secedes. 26 Garrison transferred from Fort Moultrie to Fort Sumter. January 1861 9 Mississippi secedes; Star of the West fired upon 10 Florida Secedes 11 Alabama secedes. 19 Georgia secedes. 21 Withdrawal of five Southern members of the U.S.Senate: Yulee and Mallory of Florida, Clay and Fitzpatrick of Alabama, and Davis of Mississippi. 26 Louisiana secedes. 29 Kansas admitted to the Union as a free state. February 1861 1 Texas convention votes for secession. 4 lst Session, Provisional Confederate Congress, convenes as a convention. 9 Jefferson Davis elected provisional Confederate president. 18 Jefferson Davis inaugurated. 23 Texas voters approve secession. March 1861 4 Lincoln inaugurated; Special Senate Session of 37th Congress convenes. 16 lst Session, Provisional Confederate Congress, adjourns. 28-Special Senate Session of 37th Congress adjourns. April 1861 12 Bombardment of Fort Sumter begins. 13 Fort Sumter surrenders to Southern forces. 17 Virginia secedes. 19 6th Massachusetts attacked by Baltimore mob; Lincoln declares blockade of Southern coast. 20 Norfolk, Virginia, Navy Yard evacuated. 29 2nd Session, Provisional Confederate Congress, convenes; Maryland rejects secession. May 1861 6 Arkansas secedes; Tennessee legislature calls for popular vote on secession. 10 Union forces capture Camp Jackson, and a riot follows in St. Louis. 13 Baltimore occupied by U.S. troops. 20 North Carolina secedes.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Fought for the Union Which Represent 52% of the Sons of Harvard Killed in Action During This Conflict
    Advocates for Harvard ROTC . H CRIMSON UNION ARMY VETERANS Total served Died in service Killed in action Died by disease Harvard College grads 475 73 69 26 Harvard College- non grads 114 22 Harvard Graduate schools 349 22 NA NA Total 938 117 69 26 The above total of Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union included 5 major generals, 3 Brigadier Generals, 6 colonels, 19 LT Colonels and majors, 17 junior officers in the Army, 3 sergeants plus 3 Naval officers, including 2 Medical doctors. 72% of all Harvard alumni who served in the Civil War fought for the Union which represent 52% of the sons of Harvard killed in action during this conflict. As result among Harvard alumni, Union military losses were 10% compared with a 21% casualty rate for the Confederate Army. The battle of Gettysburg (PA) had the highest amount of Harvard alumni serving in the Union Army who were killed in action (i.e. 11), in addition 3 Harvard alumni Confederates also died in this battle. Secondly, seven Crimson warriors made the supreme sacrifice for the Union at Antietam (MD) with 5 more were killed in the battles of Cedar Mountain (VA) and Fredericksburg (VA). As expected, most of the Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union were born and raised in the Northeastern states (e.g. 74% from Massachusetts). However, 9 Harvard alumni Union casualties were from the Mid West including one from the border state of Missouri. None of these Harvard men were from southern states. The below men who made the supreme sacrifice for their country to preserve the union which also resulted in the abolition of slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limits of Social Mobility: Social Origins and Career Patterns of British Generals, 1688-1815
    The London School of Economics and Political Science The Limits of Social Mobility: social origins and career patterns of British generals, 1688-1815 Andrew B. Wood A thesis submitted to the Department of Economic History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, November, 2011 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 88,820 words. 2 Abstract Late eighteenth-century Britain was dominated by two features of economic life that were a major departure from previous eras, the economic growth of the Industrial Revolution and almost constant warfare conducted on a previously unprecedented scale. One consequence of this was the rapid expansion, diversification and development of the professions. Sociologists and economists have often argued that economic development and modernisation leads to increasing rates of social mobility. However, historians of the army and professions in the eighteenth-century claim the upper levels of the army were usually isolated from mobility as the highest ranks were dominated by sons of the aristocracy and landed elite.
    [Show full text]