Investigation of Host Factors Involved in Legionella Pneumophila Virulence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigation of Host Factors Involved in Legionella Pneumophila Virulence Investigation of host factors involved in Legionella pneumophila virulence Sze Ying Ong Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2017 Department of Microbiology and Immunology The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute of Infection and Immunity Produced on archival quality paper ABSTRACT Legionella pneumophila is an environmental organism that can become accidental bacterial pathogen when inhaled into the lungs of humans. On entering the lungs, L. pneumophila is phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages. However, instead of being removed accordingly by the host immune system, the bacteria rapidly establish a Legionella-containing vacuole (LCV) and replicate intracellularly. The ability to establish the LCV relies on a type IV secretion system, also known as the Dot/Icm system. The Dot/Icm system is essential for virulence and delivers a large repertoire (> 300) of effector proteins into infected host cells. These effector proteins modulate a wide range of host processes such as vesicle trafficking, host protein translation, regulation of GTPases and apoptosis. Despite the phenomenal number (one of the highest among known bacterial pathogens) of effector proteins translocated by L. pneumophila into host cells, effector secretion is not detected until the bacterium contacts a host cell. This is in contrast to other bacterial pathogens such as enteropathogenic Escherichia coli or Salmonella sp., which can be induced to secrete effector proteins via a type III secretion system into liquid bacteriological cultures. The interactions that occur between the host cells and L. pneumophila in order to activate the Dot/Icm system are poorly understood. In this study, we used an RNAi approach to screen for host factors that contribute to Dot/Icm effector protein translocation. A genome-wide siRNA screen was performed that individually silenced each protein-coding gene in the human genome (~ 18 000 genes) and monitored for any changes in translocation of the prototypic effector protein, RalF, after L. pneumophila infection. This screen identified 119 genes whose silencing resulted in increased translocation of RalF while knockdown of 321 genes resulted in decreased translocation. Strikingly, we found that genes in the ubiquitination pathway were significantly over-represented among the factors that contribute to the efficiency of RalF translocation during L. pneumophila infection. We further showed these ubiquitination factors also influence translocation of another effector protein, SidB. This suggested that the host ubiquitination pathway was important in mediating Dot/Icm effector protein translocation. Interestingly, we also found that two of the host ubiquitination factors that facilitated effector protein translocation were also important for L. pneumophila intracellular replication. These i were UBE2E1 and CUL7; an E2-conjugating enzyme and E3 ligase respectively. On top of host ubiquitination factors, this screen also identified many other host factors that were not previously appreciated as having possible roles in Dot/Icm mediated effector protein translocation. Given the finding that ubiquitination is important for Dot/Icm effector protein translocation and that the LCV is an ER-like compartment, we hypothesised that this process occurred in a manner equivalent to retrotranslocation, a process that moves ubiquitinated protein substrates from within the ER into the cytoplasm. Unfortunately, we were not able to conclude this as silencing gene expression of the ATPase, p97, which drives this process, resulted in significant host cell death. To this end, the significance of ubiquitination pathways on Dot/Icm mediated effector protein translocation is yet to be elucidated. Nevertheless, this study has contributed significantly to our understanding of host-Legionella interactions and provided much new information about the plausible interplay between the host cell and the Dot/Icm system. Finally, we demonstrated the utility of genome-wide high-throughput screening in human cells to study L. pneumophila pathogenesis. ii DECLARATION This is to certify that: i. This thesis comprises only my original work towards the Doctor of Philosophy except where indicated in the preface ii. Due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used iii. This thesis is fewer than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, maps, bibliographies and appendices Sze Ying Ong Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity iii PREFACE In accordance with the regulations of The University of Melbourne, I acknowledge that some of the work presented in this thesis was collaborative. Specifically: In chapter 3, optimisation of the genome-wide RNAi screen was performed with the assistance of Ralf Schülen. In chapter 3, the pXDC61:LseA and pXDC61:LseB constructs were made by Ralf Schülen. In chapters 3, 4 and 5, the pXDC61:RalF construct was made by Ralf Schülen. In chapter 4, the genome-wide RNAi screen was performed with the assistance of Ralf Schülen. Operation of transfection robot was performed by Daniel Thomas while data was analysed with assistance from Piyush Madhamshettiwar (Victorian Centre for Functional Genomics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre). In chapter 5, the L. pneumophila 130b ΔicmSW was constructed by Ralf Schülen. The remainder of this thesis comprises only my original work. iv LIST OF PUBLICATIONS ARISING FROM THIS THESIS This thesis contains material that is published or is currently in preparation for publication: Ong SY, Schülen R, Thomas D, Madhamshettiwar P, Luu J, Handoko Y, Freytag S, Bahlo M, Simpson KJ, Hartland EL (2017). Genome-wide RNAi screen identified host ubiquitination as important for Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm mediated effector translocation. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Completion of this PhD will not be possible without the help, support and guidance of many people, all of whom needs to be properly acknowledged. Firstly, thank you Liz for taking me on as a research assistant in 2010. Back then, I really appreciated the opportunity you gave me even though I came fresh out of Honours without any real experience in Microbiology. Even more surprising for me is when you fully supported and encouraged me to complete a PhD in your lab 2 years later. I really appreciate the confidence you had in me and I am extremely grateful that you allowed me to take on such a big and crazy project in my PhD. Thank you for all your guidance and encouragement over the years, for giving me confidence to do and take on so many things that I otherwise will have been too scared to do. Your little timely push always does the trick in making me get over myself and get on with the task. I have grown and learnt so much under your supervision during my PhD, be it how to think and run experiments as a scientist to enthusiasm for science. Till now, I still think that I am extremely lucky that we crossed paths many years ago and you graciously took me on. So once again, a big THANK YOU! Thank you also to my second supervisor, Ralf. You have taught me all that I ever know about molecular biology and Legionella. You are an incredibly patient man who always had time for me and answered all my naive questions. Your meticulous approach to science is something that I truly admire and I am indebted to you for all the guidance you gave me. Without you, the RNAi screen will have been a lot harder, both physically and mentally! The daily trips to Peter Mac were more enjoyable with your company and those sneaky lunches that we squeeze in are something I looked forward to. I have learnt a lot from you and you had a significant role in making me the scientist (and person) I am today. I really couldn’t have asked for a better lab supervisor. Finally, thank you also for your friendship. It helped me get through PhD without going insane. Thank you also to Shivani for the guidance towards the end of my PhD. You made sure my thesis drafts were not an embarrassment before they were submitted to Liz. vi They could have been torn to shreds if you hadn’t so generously given up some of your time to help me. To my PhD buddies in the Hartland lab – Cristina, Tania and Ying Z, thank you for ‘being in it’ together! It was fantastic having company and people who are going through the same thing together. You girls motivate me to work harder and push me to do things which I would not have done if I did not have you guys doing it with me together. Being the last in the gang to write up, I also probably had the easiest job putting my thesis together as I had all your theses to look at as a guide/template. Thank you for all the thesis help! Cristina, thank you for making me sit down and submit my 80-word summary. I would still have been umm-ing and ahh-ing about it if you hadn’t put your foot down and got me to submit it. Also, thank you for all the free rides I get at the end of the day so that I don’t have to go onto the dreaded tram to get home! Finally, our birthday celebrations, dinners and drinking sessions were critical in helping me make it to the end of my PhD, so thank you for all the fun over the years too! We might have gone on different paths now, but this experience together is something that will stay with us forever. Ka Yee, thank you for being my listening ear in the lab. You are the best lab bench buddy and I can truly say that no one else had been able to replace you since you left the lab. You had the wisdom of making it through a PhD and always give me intelligent opinions in my scientific dilemmas.
Recommended publications
  • Computational Genome-Wide Identification of Heat Shock Protein Genes in the Bovine Genome [Version 1; Peer Review: 2 Approved, 1 Approved with Reservations]
    F1000Research 2018, 7:1504 Last updated: 08 AUG 2021 RESEARCH ARTICLE Computational genome-wide identification of heat shock protein genes in the bovine genome [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] Oyeyemi O. Ajayi1,2, Sunday O. Peters3, Marcos De Donato2,4, Sunday O. Sowande5, Fidalis D.N. Mujibi6, Olanrewaju B. Morenikeji2,7, Bolaji N. Thomas 8, Matthew A. Adeleke 9, Ikhide G. Imumorin2,10,11 1Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria 2International Programs, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA 3Department of Animal Science, Berry College, Mount Berry, GA, 30149, USA 4Departamento Regional de Bioingenierias, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingenieria y Ciencias, Queretaro, Mexico 5Department of Animal Production and Health, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria 6Usomi Limited, Nairobi, Kenya 7Department of Animal Production and Health, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria 8Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA 9School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4000, South Africa 10School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30032, USA 11African Institute of Bioscience Research and Training, Ibadan, Nigeria v1 First published: 20 Sep 2018, 7:1504 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16058.1 Latest published: 20 Sep 2018, 7:1504 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16058.1 Reviewer Status Invited Reviewers Abstract Background: Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are molecular chaperones 1 2 3 known to bind and sequester client proteins under stress. Methods: To identify and better understand some of these proteins, version 1 we carried out a computational genome-wide survey of the bovine 20 Sep 2018 report report report genome.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen the Human HSP70/HSP40 Chaperone Family
    University of Groningen The human HSP70/HSP40 chaperone family Hageman, Jurre IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2008 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Hageman, J. (2008). The human HSP70/HSP40 chaperone family: a study on its capacity to combat proteotoxic stress. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 30-09-2021 CHAPTER 1 Introduction - Structural and functional diversities between members of the human HSPH, HSPA and DNAJ chaperone families Jurre Hageman and Harm H.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Quality Control in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Focus on Parkinson’S Disease and Huntington’S Disease
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Mitochondrial quality control in neurodegenerative diseases: focus on Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease TESI DOCTORAL 2018 Programa de Doctorat en Neurociències Institut de Neurociències Tesi realitzada al laboratori de Malalties Neurodegeenratives de l’Institut de Recerca de la Vall d’Hebron (VHIR) Doctorand Director Tutor Sandra Franco Iborra Miquel Vila Bover José Rodríguez Álvarez Co-directora Co-directora Celine Perier Marta Martínez Vicente i AGRAÏMENTS En primer lloc vull agraïr al Miquel Vila per l’oportunitat que em va donar de començar a fer la tesi doctoral al seu lab. Gràcies per tenir sempre la porta oberta del teu despatx, per la confiança dipositada en mi i per tot el que m’has ensenyat durant tots aquests anys. A més, he tingut la sort de tenir no només un director de tesis sinó tres! Celine muchas gracias por estar siempre ahí, por ensenyarme tu manera de hacer ciencia (que me encanta!) y por ser siempre tan positiva. En mi manera de trabajar hay un poquito de ti y espero ir pasando este conocimiento a los demás porque en todo laboratorio debería ser obligatorio que hubiera alguien como tu.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Protein Quality Control Mechanisms
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Mitochondrial Protein Quality Control Mechanisms Pooja Jadiya * and Dhanendra Tomar * Center for Translational Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (P.J.); [email protected] (D.T.); Tel.: +1-215-707-9144 (D.T.) Received: 29 April 2020; Accepted: 15 May 2020; Published: 18 May 2020 Abstract: Mitochondria serve as a hub for many cellular processes, including bioenergetics, metabolism, cellular signaling, redox balance, calcium homeostasis, and cell death. The mitochondrial proteome includes over a thousand proteins, encoded by both the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. The majority (~99%) of proteins are nuclear encoded that are synthesized in the cytosol and subsequently imported into the mitochondria. Within the mitochondria, polypeptides fold and assemble into their native functional form. Mitochondria health and integrity depend on correct protein import, folding, and regulated turnover termed as mitochondrial protein quality control (MPQC). Failure to maintain these processes can cause mitochondrial dysfunction that leads to various pathophysiological outcomes and the commencement of diseases. Here, we summarize the current knowledge about the role of different MPQC regulatory systems such as mitochondrial chaperones, proteases, the ubiquitin-proteasome system, mitochondrial unfolded protein response, mitophagy, and mitochondria-derived vesicles in the maintenance of mitochondrial proteome and health. The proper understanding of mitochondrial protein quality control mechanisms will provide relevant insights to treat multiple human diseases. Keywords: mitochondria; proteome; ubiquitin; proteasome; chaperones; protease; mitophagy; mitochondrial protein quality control; mitochondria-associated degradation; mitochondrial unfolded protein response 1. Introduction Mitochondria are double membrane, dynamic, and semiautonomous organelles which have several critical cellular functions.
    [Show full text]
  • DNAJC19 Polyclonal Antibody Catalog Number:12096-1-AP Featured Product 5 Publications
    For Research Use Only DNAJC19 Polyclonal antibody Catalog Number:12096-1-AP Featured Product 5 Publications www.ptglab.com Catalog Number: GenBank Accession Number: Purification Method: Basic Information 12096-1-AP BC009702 Antigen affinity purification Size: GeneID (NCBI): Recommended Dilutions: 150ul , Concentration: 600 μg/ml by 131118 WB 1:500-1:2000 Nanodrop and 213 μg/ml by Bradford Full Name: IP 0.5-4.0 ug for IP and 1:500-1:2000 method using BSA as the standard; DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, for WB Source: member 19 IF 1:10-1:100 Rabbit Calculated MW: Isotype: 116 aa, 13 kDa IgG Observed MW: Immunogen Catalog Number: 13 kDa AG2739 Applications Tested Applications: Positive Controls: IF, IP, WB,ELISA WB : HeLa cells, human brain tissue, human lung tissue Cited Applications: IP : mouse heart tissue, WB IF : HepG2 cells, Species Specificity: human, mouse, rat Cited Species: human DNAJC19 is a mitochondrial cochaperone that interacts with HSP70 chaperones through its conserved J-domain. As a Background Information transmembrane protein, DNAJC19 is strongly associated with the inner mitochondrial membrane. Mutations in DNAJC19 cause dilated cardiomyopathy with ataxia (DCMA). Recently DNAJC19 has been reported as interactor of PHB complex to regulate cardiolipin remodeling, which addressed the link of DNAJC19 to cardiomyopathy. This antibody is specific to DNAJC19 and had been tested by siRNA.(24856930) Notable Publications Author Pubmed ID Journal Application Shotaro Saita 28288130 Nat Cell Biol WB Michelle Grace Acoba 33730581 Cell Rep WB Anna Janz 32521499 Stem Cell Res Storage: Storage Store at -20°C. Stable for one year after shipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Hsp60 Chaperonopathies and Chaperonotherapy: Targets and Agents 1
    Review Hsp60 chaperonopathies and chaperonotherapy: targets and agents 1. The chaperonopathies and their treatment Francesco Cappello, Antonella Marino Gammazza, Antonio Palumbo Piccionello, Claudia Campanella, Andrea Pace, 2. The concept of † Everly Conway de Macario & Alberto JL Macario chaperonopathy by mistake: † Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland at the case of Hsp60 Baltimore; and IMET, Columbus Center, Baltimore, MD, USA 3. Hsp60 and autoimmune diseases Introduction: Hsp60 (Cpn60) assembles into a tetradecamer that interacts with 4. Hsp60 and chronic the co-chaperonin Hsp10 (Cpn10) to assist client polypeptides to fold, but it inflammatory diseases also has other roles, including participation in pathogenic mechanisms. Area covered: Hsp60 chaperonopathies are pathological conditions, inherited 5. Hsp60 and cancer or acquired, in which the chaperone plays a determinant etiologic-pathogenic 6. Hsp60 can interact directly role. These diseases justify selection of Hsp60 as a target for developing agents with molecules in various cell that interfere with its pathogenic effects. We provide information on how compartments to proceed. 7. Hsp60 structural features key Expert opinion: The information available encourages the development of for function and potential ways to improve Hsp60 activity (positive chaperonotherapy) when deficient targets for therapeutics or to block it (negative chaperonotherapy) when pathogenic. Many questions 8. Hsp60 inhibitors: new drugs are still unanswered and obstacles are obvious. More information is needed for old diseases to establish when and why autologous Hsp60 becomes a pathogenic autoan- 9. Conclusions tigen, or induces cytokine formation and inflammation, or favors carcinogen- 10. Expert opinion esis. Clarification of these points will take considerable time.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mitochondrial Quality Control Mechanisms and the PHB (Prohibitin)
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 12 November 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201811.0268.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Cells 2018, 7, 238; doi:10.3390/cells7120238 1 Review 2 Mitochondrial quality control mechanisms and the PHB (prohibitin) complex 3 Blanca Hernando-Rodríguez 1,2 and Marta Artal-Sanz 1,2,* 4 1 Andalusian Center for Developmental Biology, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas/Junta de 5 Andalucía/Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain 6 2 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, 7 Spain 8 * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34- 954 978-323 9 10 Abstract: Mitochondrial functions are essential for life, critical for development, maintenance of 11 stem cells, adaptation to physiological changes, responses to stress and aging. The complexity of 12 mitochondrial biogenesis requires coordinated nuclear and mitochondrial gene expression, owing 13 to the need of stoichiometrically assemble the OXPHOS system for ATP production. It requires, in 14 addition, the import of thousands of proteins from the cytosol to keep optimal mitochondrial 15 function and metabolism. Moreover, mitochondria require lipid supply for membrane biogenesis, 16 while it is itself essential for the synthesis of membrane lipids. 17 To achieve mitochondrial homeostasis, multiple mechanisms of quality control have evolved to 18 ensure that mitochondrial function meets cell, tissue and organismal demands. Herein, we give an 19 overview of mitochondrial mechanisms that are activated in response to stress, including 20 mitochondrial dynamics, mitophagy and the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt). We 21 then discuss the role of these stress responses in aging, with particular focus on Caenorhabditis 22 elegans.
    [Show full text]
  • Cldn19 Clic2 Clmp Cln3
    NewbornDx™ Advanced Sequencing Evaluation When time to diagnosis matters, the NewbornDx™ Advanced Sequencing Evaluation from Athena Diagnostics delivers rapid, 5- to 7-day results on a targeted 1,722-genes. A2ML1 ALAD ATM CAV1 CLDN19 CTNS DOCK7 ETFB FOXC2 GLUL HOXC13 JAK3 AAAS ALAS2 ATP1A2 CBL CLIC2 CTRC DOCK8 ETFDH FOXE1 GLYCTK HOXD13 JUP AARS2 ALDH18A1 ATP1A3 CBS CLMP CTSA DOK7 ETHE1 FOXE3 GM2A HPD KANK1 AASS ALDH1A2 ATP2B3 CC2D2A CLN3 CTSD DOLK EVC FOXF1 GMPPA HPGD K ANSL1 ABAT ALDH3A2 ATP5A1 CCDC103 CLN5 CTSK DPAGT1 EVC2 FOXG1 GMPPB HPRT1 KAT6B ABCA12 ALDH4A1 ATP5E CCDC114 CLN6 CUBN DPM1 EXOC4 FOXH1 GNA11 HPSE2 KCNA2 ABCA3 ALDH5A1 ATP6AP2 CCDC151 CLN8 CUL4B DPM2 EXOSC3 FOXI1 GNAI3 HRAS KCNB1 ABCA4 ALDH7A1 ATP6V0A2 CCDC22 CLP1 CUL7 DPM3 EXPH5 FOXL2 GNAO1 HSD17B10 KCND2 ABCB11 ALDOA ATP6V1B1 CCDC39 CLPB CXCR4 DPP6 EYA1 FOXP1 GNAS HSD17B4 KCNE1 ABCB4 ALDOB ATP7A CCDC40 CLPP CYB5R3 DPYD EZH2 FOXP2 GNE HSD3B2 KCNE2 ABCB6 ALG1 ATP8A2 CCDC65 CNNM2 CYC1 DPYS F10 FOXP3 GNMT HSD3B7 KCNH2 ABCB7 ALG11 ATP8B1 CCDC78 CNTN1 CYP11B1 DRC1 F11 FOXRED1 GNPAT HSPD1 KCNH5 ABCC2 ALG12 ATPAF2 CCDC8 CNTNAP1 CYP11B2 DSC2 F13A1 FRAS1 GNPTAB HSPG2 KCNJ10 ABCC8 ALG13 ATR CCDC88C CNTNAP2 CYP17A1 DSG1 F13B FREM1 GNPTG HUWE1 KCNJ11 ABCC9 ALG14 ATRX CCND2 COA5 CYP1B1 DSP F2 FREM2 GNS HYDIN KCNJ13 ABCD3 ALG2 AUH CCNO COG1 CYP24A1 DST F5 FRMD7 GORAB HYLS1 KCNJ2 ABCD4 ALG3 B3GALNT2 CCS COG4 CYP26C1 DSTYK F7 FTCD GP1BA IBA57 KCNJ5 ABHD5 ALG6 B3GAT3 CCT5 COG5 CYP27A1 DTNA F8 FTO GP1BB ICK KCNJ8 ACAD8 ALG8 B3GLCT CD151 COG6 CYP27B1 DUOX2 F9 FUCA1 GP6 ICOS KCNK3 ACAD9 ALG9
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Sequencing Unveils a Regulatory Landscape of Platelet Reactivity
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23470-9 OPEN Genome sequencing unveils a regulatory landscape of platelet reactivity Ali R. Keramati 1,2,124, Ming-Huei Chen3,4,124, Benjamin A. T. Rodriguez3,4,5,124, Lisa R. Yanek 2,6, Arunoday Bhan7, Brady J. Gaynor 8,9, Kathleen Ryan8,9, Jennifer A. Brody 10, Xue Zhong11, Qiang Wei12, NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision (TOPMed) Consortium*, Kai Kammers13, Kanika Kanchan14, Kruthika Iyer14, Madeline H. Kowalski15, Achilleas N. Pitsillides4,16, L. Adrienne Cupples 4,16, Bingshan Li 12, Thorsten M. Schlaeger7, Alan R. Shuldiner9, Jeffrey R. O’Connell8,9, Ingo Ruczinski17, Braxton D. Mitchell 8,9, ✉ Nauder Faraday2,18, Margaret A. Taub17, Lewis C. Becker1,2, Joshua P. Lewis 8,9,125 , 2,14,125✉ 3,4,125✉ 1234567890():,; Rasika A. Mathias & Andrew D. Johnson Platelet aggregation at the site of atherosclerotic vascular injury is the underlying patho- physiology of myocardial infarction and stroke. To build upon prior GWAS, here we report on 16 loci identified through a whole genome sequencing (WGS) approach in 3,855 NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) participants deeply phenotyped for platelet aggregation. We identify the RGS18 locus, which encodes a myeloerythroid lineage-specific regulator of G-protein signaling that co-localizes with expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) signatures for RGS18 expression in platelets. Gene-based approaches implicate the SVEP1 gene, a known contributor of coronary artery disease risk. Sentinel variants at RGS18 and PEAR1 are associated with thrombosis risk and increased gastrointestinal bleeding risk, respectively. Our WGS findings add to previously identified GWAS loci, provide insights regarding the mechanism(s) by which genetics may influence cardiovascular disease risk, and underscore the importance of rare variant and regulatory approaches to identifying loci contributing to complex phenotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Eye Research 129 (2014) 93E106
    Experimental Eye Research 129 (2014) 93e106 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Experimental Eye Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yexer Transcriptomic analysis across nasal, temporal, and macular regions of human neural retina and RPE/choroid by RNA-Seq S. Scott Whitmore a, b, Alex H. Wagner a, c, Adam P. DeLuca a, b, Arlene V. Drack a, b, Edwin M. Stone a, b, Budd A. Tucker a, b, Shemin Zeng a, b, Terry A. Braun a, b, c, * Robert F. Mullins a, b, Todd E. Scheetz a, b, c, a Stephen A. Wynn Institute for Vision Research, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA b Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA c Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA article info abstract Article history: Proper spatial differentiation of retinal cell types is necessary for normal human vision. Many retinal Received 14 September 2014 diseases, such as Best disease and male germ cell associated kinase (MAK)-associated retinitis pigmen- Received in revised form tosa, preferentially affect distinct topographic regions of the retina. While much is known about the 31 October 2014 distribution of cell types in the retina, the distribution of molecular components across the posterior pole Accepted in revised form 4 November 2014 of the eye has not been well-studied. To investigate regional difference in molecular composition of Available online 5 November 2014 ocular tissues, we assessed differential gene expression across the temporal, macular, and nasal retina and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)/choroid of human eyes using RNA-Seq.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Homeostasis, Second Edition
    This is a free sample of content from Protein Homeostasis, Second Edition. Click here for more information on how to buy the book. Index A overview of diseases, 13, 41–43 Abf2, 160 polyphosphate AD. See Alzheimer’s disease amyloidogenic protein interactions, 393–395 AFG3L2, 162 cytotoxicity amelioration, 396–397 Africa swine fever virus (ASFV), 468 prospects for study, 52, 55 Aging protein homeostasis context, 48–49 heat shock factors, 431 structure–activity relationship, 14–15 proteostasis network regulation, 450–452 therapeutic intervention, 50–52 Ago2, 335, 467 toxicity, 47–48 Aha1, 333, 335, 338–339, 504 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), 214, 262, 264, AIRAP, 267 290–291, 293, 404, 409, 524, 532 AIRAPL, 267–268 ApoB, 135 AKT, 274, 467 ASFV. See Africa swine fever virus ALK, 503 ATAD1, 104 ALMC2, 487 ATF4, 79, 88, 182, 186, 189, 445–446 ALP. See Autophagy lysosome pathway ATF5, 182, 186, 189 a-Synuclein, 375, 522 ATF6, 60, 62–64, 79, 445–446, 481–482, 484–489 ALS. See Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ATFS-1, 99, 180–181, 185, 188–189, 445–446 Alzheimer’s disease (AD), 186, 519 Atg7, 293 autophagy lysosomal pathway, 290–291 Atg32, 167 chaperone studies, 213–214, 216–217, 222 ATM, 313 Hsp90 studies, 337 ATR, 313 polyphosphate studies, 392, 394–395, 399 Atropine, 501 AMPK, 444 ATXN2, 524 Amyloid Autophagy lysosome pathway (ALP) chaperone modulation chaperone-mediated autophagy, 288–289 aggregation prevention, 217–222 history of study, 285 degradation of amyloid-forming proteins, 225–227 macroautophagy, 287–288 disaggregation of amyloids,
    [Show full text]