SPECIAL ARTICLES

Allopathic and Osteopathic Medicine Unify GME Accreditation: A Historic Convergence Abdul-Kareem H. Ahmed, SM; Peter F. Schnatz, DO, NCMP; Eli Y. Adashi, MD, MS

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 1968, the American Medical As- this latest development redefines sociation resolved to accept qualified graduates of osteopathic medical the allopathic-osteopathic interface schools into its accredited Graduate Medical Education (GME) programs. in a manner reminiscent of the his- An equally momentous decision was arrived at in 2014 when the Accredi- toric 1968 decision of the American tation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the American Os- Medical Association (AMA) to accept teopathic Association (AOA), and the American Association of Colleges of qualified graduates of osteopathic Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) resolved to institute a single unified GME medical schools into AMA-accredit- accreditation system by July 1, 2020. As envisioned, the unified accredi- ed GME programs.3 tation system will all but assure system-wide consistency of purpose and practice in anticipation of the Next Accreditation System (NAS) of the AC- Osteopathic Medicine GME. Governance integration replete with AOA and AACOM and osteopath- and the ACGME ic representation on the ACGME Board of Directors is now well underway. Central to this transition is the des- What is more, osteopathic representation on current Review Committees (RCs) and in a newly established one with an osteopathic focus has been ignation of the AOA and AACOM instituted. Viewed broadly, the unification of the GME accreditation system as member organizations of the goes a long way toward recognizing the overlapping characteristics in the ACGME and their representation training and practice of allopathic and osteopathic medicine. As such, this on the ACGME Board of Directors. momentous development represents the latest, indeed boldest leap toward Subject to this new governance convergence between the two historic branches of American medicine. In structure, the expanded ACGME this Health Policy Analysis we seek to place the impending unification of will assume the additional respon- the GME accreditation process in its historical context, delineate its near- sibility of accrediting the more than term impact, and discuss the potential long-term implications thereof. 1,000 osteopathic (heretofore AOA- accredited) GME programs.1,4 In so doing, the ACGME will be guided by (Fam Med. 2019;49(5):374-7.) osteopathic representation on cur- rent Review Committees (RCs) as well as by a newly established os- n February 26, 2014, the less than to afford all future allo- teopathic-focused RC.1,4 In each and Accreditation Council for pathic and osteopathic physicians every case, the ACGME will be ap- OGraduate Medical Educa- with a “uniform path of preparation plying its Next Accreditation Sys- tion (ACGME), the American Osteo- for practice” and to establish con- tem (NAS), the full implementation pathic Association (AOA), and the sistency in the “evaluation of and of which went into effect on July 1, American Association of Colleges of accountability for… competency… 2014.5 It follows that the all-impor- Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) re- across all programs.”1 Arguably the tant NAS imperatives—innovation, solved to institute a single unified most significant modification of GME accreditation system for Graduate since the institution of the Resident Medical Education (GME) by July Duty Hour reform, this agreement From Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown 1, 2020.1 The product of 2-year long rewrites the status quo yet again by University (Mr Ahmed and Dr Adashi); discussions, this “watershed moment standardizing GME accreditation in Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and 1,2 Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University for medical education” seeks nothing the United States. Concurrently, (Dr Schnatz).

374 MAY 2017 • VOL. 49, NO. 5 FAMILY MEDICINE SPECIAL ARTICLES

tracking of outcomes, measurement that states that “AOA programs that the allopathic enterprise.13-18 Key of milestones, ongoing quality im- do not apply for ACGME accredita- milestones in the hard-fought pro- provement, and the clinical learn- tion cannot accept new trainees af- gression to parity included the rec- ing environment—stand to impact ter July 1 of the year in which the ognition of as a distinct more GME programs than origi- resident can complete their training medical education track, the estab- nally envisioned.4-6 Notwithstand- by June 30, 2020.” As such, this mea- lishment of a distinct board of ex- ing the forgoing, great care will be sure assures resident applicants that aminers, and the right to prescribe exercised to preserve and codify the any program they enter will retain drugs.13,14,17 Amended state laws per- “unique principles and practices of its accreditation through the comple- mitting the licensing of osteopathic the osteopathic medical profession” tion of their training.9 practitioners followed suit.19 Addi- by way of a “Recognition Commit- As of August 14, 2015, the tional progress was evident in the tee” tasked with defining an “osteo- ACGME Review Committees of wake of the Flexner Report with pathic recognition” designation to most (21 of 23) applicable special- osteopathic medicine gaining entry be conferred upon qualified GME ties resolved to assure further al- into the United States Military Med- programs.1,4,7 Similar commitments lopathic-osteopathic equity by ical Corps and into AMA-accredit- have been made to maintain osteo- abandoning the prior requirement ed GME programs.3,20,21 However, it pathic signature GME programs, the of an American Board of Medical was not until the recent unification oversight of which will rest with a Specialties (ABMS)-certified co-pro- of GME accreditation that allopathic dedicated Osteopathic Neuromuscu- gram director.9-11 These specialties and osteopathic medicine have con- loskeletal Medicine Review Commit- include allergy and immunology, an- verged in a manner heretofore un- tee (ONMM RC).1,4 esthesiology, dermatology, diagnos- likely.22-26 Going forward, AOA-accredited tic radiology, emergency medicine, In the eyes of many, the distinc- GME programs are to apply for family medicine, general surgery, in- tion between allopathic and os- ACGME accreditation and, if desired, ternal medicine, neurology, obstet- teopathic disciplines has become for the “osteopathic recognition” des- rics and gynecology, ophthalmology, increasingly nuanced.23 Absent the ignation between July 1, 2015, and orthopedic surgery, otolaryngolo- osteopathic emphasis on the pri- June 30, 2020.1,4 Upon entering the gy, osteopathic neuromuscoloskele- macy of the musculoskeletal sys- ACGME accreditation process, AOA- tal medicine, pathology, pediatrics, tem in human health and disease, accredited GME programs are to be physical medicine and rehabilitation, primary care-focused training,27-29 assigned a “pre-accreditation” sta- plastic surgery, preventive medicine, and an emphasis on a holistic ap- tus.4 Starting July 1, 2016, eligibility psychiatry, and thoracic surgery. proach to patient care, the two dis- for all advanced positions Identical arrangements will apply ciplines are similar.23,30 Drawing on will require completion of prerequi- to for Transitional Year programs. In an overlapping applicant pool, both site training in a program accredited contrast, the ACGME Review Com- the allopathic and osteopathic medi- by the ACGME, the Royal College of mittees of the specialties of urology cal education enterprises follow the Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and neurosurgery will, for now, con- well-trodden track from undergrad- (RCPSC), or the College of Family tinue to require an “ABMS-certified uate to graduate to postgraduate Physicians of Canada (CFPC). Resi- co-program director.”9,10 Given the training. In 2013, osteopathic medi- dents in or entering existing AOA- absence of osteopathic counterparts cal schools were home to 21.2% of all accredited GME programs with to the specialties of colon and rec- actively enrolled medical students.31 ACGME “pre-accreditation” status tal surgery, medical genetics, nucle- Both require a pre-med orientation during the 5-year transition period ar medicine and radiation oncology, and the Medical College Admission who are seeking training in ACGME- these programs will continue to rely Test (MCAT) as conditions for entry accredited residency and on an “ABMS-certified co-program into a 4-year undergraduate medical programs, will be subject to the eli- director.”9,10 education program. Both subscribe gibility standards (per specialty) that to similar curricular and accredita- were in effect June 30, 2013 or July Parallel Training Tracks tion standards. Both pursue similar 1, 2016, whichever is less restrictive.8 In 1874, , MD, licensing and specialty certification Throughout this transitional inter- DO, gave rise to the clinical princi- milestones that are all but uniformly val the AOA will continue to exer- ples that launched the osteopathy recognized by state-licensing boards cise its accreditation authority over movement.12 Special focus has been as well as by public and private pay- osteopathic GME programs.4 How- placed on the import of holistic pre- ers. Both enjoy a comparable scope ever, at the conclusion of this period, vention and on the relationship be- of practice as well as eligibility for on or before June 30, 2020, the AOA tween the musculoskeletal system membership with many of the same will cede its accreditation authority and health and disease. However, professional organizations. And all to the ACGME.4 The AOA Board of since its inception, osteopathy has but one state (PA) share the same Trustees also approved a standard struggled to achieve parity with licensing boards. In this regard,

FAMILY MEDICINE VOL. 49, NO. 5 • MAY 2017 375 SPECIAL ARTICLES

the joint commitment of allopathic graduates is difficult to ascertain. intended to reverse the “GME Bottle- and osteopathic medicine to estab- Pre-accredition of programs does neck.”37,38 In addition, however, this lish a single unified GME accredita- not guarantee final accreditation, development does its part to further tion system goes a long way toward a point of concern to students en- highlight some of the seemingly out- acknowledging the tenuous prem- tering such programs. Institutional dated distinctions between the two ise of what some view as a persis- and program-specific requirements historic branches of American medi- tent artificial divide.23 After all, 60% for accreditation by the ACGME cine.23 Indeed, with a single unified of all the graduates of osteopathic has already resulted in the closing GME accreditation system in place, medical schools are presently being of some programs. The number and compelling arguments can be made trained in ACGME-accredited pro- nature of programs that will close is in support of common matching, li- grams (51% in ACGME-accredited uncertain. However, the unification censing, and certification paradigms. programs; 9% in ACGME/AOA du- of accreditation also promises that In the final analysis, the main bene- ally-accredited programs).23,32,33 all programs remaining will meet a ficiary is the American public whose minimum standard of quality. social compact has just been revised Implications for It is not beyond the realm of pos- to state that the training and evalu- American Medicine sibility that the establishment of a ation of all future physicians in the The consequences of this new steady single unified GME accreditation United States will be unified, con- state are far-reaching. First, quali- system may further accelerate the sistent, and accountable to the same fied graduates of either allopathic or process of convergence of allopath- governing organization. osteopathic medical schools will be ic and osteopathic medicine. Given CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Address cor- eligible to apply for residency train- a single pool of ACGME-accredited respondence to Dr Adashi, Warren Alpert ing with all future ACGME-accred- GME programs, it is tempting to Medical School, Brown University, 101 Dudley ited programs.4 This development is speculate that the distinct digital Street, Providence, RI 02905. 401-863-9037. Fax: 401-274-4032. [email protected]. of significance to graduates of allo- processes of matching allopathic (Na- pathic medical schools who were pre- tional Resident Matching Program) References viously precluded from applying to and osteopathic (National Matching 1. Allopathic and osteopathic medical communi- AOA-accredited GME training pro- Services Inc.) medical student appli- ties commit to a single graduate medical edu- grams. Under such scenario, grad- cants with corresponding GME pro- cation accreditation system. 2014. http://www. uates of allopathic medical schools grams may be consolidated. A similar acgme.org/acgmeweb/portals/0/PDFS/Nasca- Community/SingleAccreditationRelease2-26. may be required to demonstrate rationale could apply to the prospect pdf. Accessed August 12, 2015. competencies in Osteopathic Prin- of streamlining—if not unifying— 2. Philibert I, Friedmann P, Williams WT, AC- ciples for programs with Osteopath- the specialty pro- GME Work Group on Resident Duty Hours. ic Recognition.4 Second, residents cess of qualified graduates of GME New requirements for resident duty hours. JAMA. 2002;288(9):1112-14. in training will be in a position to training programs. With the advent 3. Nunemaker JC. Osteopathy and medicine. transfer from one ACGME-accred- of universal and uniformly accred- Graduate education. JAMA. 1969;209(1):90-3. ited program to another absent the ited GME programs, the notion of 4. Letter to the Community from ACGME CEO imposition of additional educational separate and parallel specialty board Thomas J. Nasca, MD, MACP. 2014. http:// requirements and of Medicare GME certification by the American Board www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/ 4 NascaLetterACGME-AOA-AACOMAgree- funding shortfalls. It also follows of Medical Specialties and the AOA mentMarch2014.pdf. Accessed August 12, 2015. that the adaptive yet costly notion could potentially be revisited. Fi- 5. Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn of “dually accredited” allopathic and nally, consideration could be given TC. The next GME accreditation system— osteopathic medical residency train- to consolidating the parallel testing rationale and benefits. New Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):1051-6. ing programs will be rendered obso- requirements of allopathic and os- 4 6. Kelley CS. Impact of the single accredita- lete. Third, qualified graduates of teopathic trainees. These presently tion agreement on GME governance and the allopathic and osteopathic residen- consist of the USMLE (United States physician workforce. J Am Osteopath Assoc. cy training programs will be eligi- Medical Licensing Examination) and 2014;114(7):518-23. ble to apply for advanced fellowship the COMLEX-USA (Comprehensive 7. Frequently asked questions: osteopathic recog- nition. 2015. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/ training with all ACGME-accredit- Osteopathic Medical Licensure Ex- Portals/0/PDFs/FAQ/Osteopathic%20Recogni- ed programs.4 Additionally, as has amination of the United States of tion%20FAQs.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2015. been noted in the course of medical America) licensing examinations. 8. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical student clerkships, joint training The institution of a single unified Education. Frequently asked questions: single accreditation system. http://www.acgme.org/ of students of allopathic and osteo- GME accreditation system marks acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/Nasca-Community/ pathic medicine is bound to prove a transformation for the Ameri- FAQs.pdf. Accessed August 12, 2015. mutually enriching.34-36 Finally, the can medical education enterprise. 9. American Osteopathic Association. The single effects of this merger on the num- If nothing else, this development GME accreditation system. https://www.osteo- pathic.org/inside-aoa/single-gme-accreditation- ber of residency programs available stands to unify and thus materially system/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed August 12, to qualified medical and osteopathic strengthen ongoing advocacy efforts 2015.

376 MAY 2017 • VOL. 49, NO. 5 FAMILY MEDICINE SPECIAL ARTICLES

10. Program director qualifications in the single 22. Burkhart DN, Lischka TA. Dual and parallel 33. Jolly P, Lischka T, Sondheimer H. Numbers of accreditation system. 2015. https://www.acgme. postdoctoral training programs: implications MD and DO graduates in graduate medical org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/Nasca-Commu- for the osteopathic medical profession. J Am education programs accredited by the Accredi- nity/PD_Qualifications_forWeb.pdf. Accessed Osteopath Assoc. 2011;111(4):247-56. tation Council for Graduate Medical Education August 27, 2015. 23. Cohen JJ. The separate osteopathic medi- and the American Osteopathic Association. 11. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical cal education pathway: isn’t it time we got Acad Med 2015 Jul;90(7):970-4. Education. Common program requirements. our acts together? Counterpoint. Acad Med. 34. Tulgan H, DeMarco WJ, Pugnaire MP, Buser 2014. https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/ 2009;84(6):696. BR. Joint clinical clerkships for osteopathic Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/ 24. Gevitz N. Sectarian medicine. JAMA. and allopathic medical students: New Eng- CPRs_07012016.pdf. Accessed August 12, 2015. 1987;257(12):1636-40. land’s experience. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2004;104(5):212-14. 12. Still AT. Philosophy of osteopathy. Kirksville, 25. Gevitz N. “Parallel and distinctive”: the philo- MO: Academy of Osteopathy, 1899. sophic pathway for reform in osteopathic 35. Przekop PR Jr, Tulgan H, Przekop A, DeMarco 13. Crummer BG. The vile osteopathy bill. JAMA. medical education. J Am Osteopath Assoc WJ, Campbell N, Kisiel S. Implementation of 1897;XXIX(1):42. 1994;94(4):328-32. an osteopathic manipulative medicine clinic at an allopathic : a research- 14. Granger FK, Hamilton JB. The osteopathy bill. 26. Miller K. The evolution of professional identity: based experience. J Am Osteopath Assoc. JAMA 1897;XXVIII(18):855. the case of osteopathic medicine. Soc Sci Med 2003;103(11):543-9. 1998;47(11):1739-48. 15. Fishbein M. The medical follies: an analysis 36. Rubeor A, Nothnagle M, Taylor JS. Intro- of the foibles of some healing cults, including 27. Fordyce MA, Doescher MP, Chen FM, Hart ducing osteopathic medical education in an osteopathy, , chiropractic, and the LG. Osteopathic physicians and international allopathic residency. J Am Osteopath Assoc. electronic reactions of Abrams, with essays medical graduates in the rural primary care 2008;108(8):404-8. on the antivivisectionists, health legislation, physician workforce. Fam Med. 2012;44(6):396- physical culture, birth control, and rejuvena- 403. 37. Shannon SC. Reevaluating osteopathic medi- tion. New York, NY: Boni and Liveright, 1925. cal education for the 21st century and beyond. 28. Shannon SC, Ferretti SM, Wood D, Levitan T. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014;114(4):228-30. 16. Beware of the osteopathic circular. Boston Med The challenges of primary care and innovative Surg J. 1898;138(24):579. responses in osteopathic education. Health Aff. 38. Maxwell L, Tuggy M, Bhuyan N, et al. The 2010;29(5):1015-22. allopathic and osteopathic worlds: aligning our 17. The bill to authorize the practice of osteopathy training to meet our patients’ needs. Ann Fam —amateur prescribing—medical notes. Boston 29. Peters AS, Clark-Chiarelli N, Block SD. Com- Med. 2014;12(3):283. Med Surg J. 1899;140(8):195-8. parison of osteopathic and allopathic medical 18. Gevitz N. The transformation of osteopathic schools’ support for primary care. J Gen Intern medical education. Acad Med. 2009;84(6):701-6. Med. 1999;14(12):730-9. 19. Epstein DG. Limitations on the scope of prac- 30. Gevitz N. The DOs: osteopathic medicine in tice of osteopathic physicians. Miss Law Rev America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Uni- 1967;32(3):354-73. versity Press, 2004. 20. Flexner A, Carnegie Foundation for the Ad- 31. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2013 vancement of Teaching, Pritchett HS. Medical State Physician Workforce Data Book. https:// education in the United States and Canada; a members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/State Physi- Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Ad- cian Workforce Data Book 2013 (PDF).pdf. vancement of Teaching. New York City, 1910. Accessed August 12, 2015. 21. Gevitz N. The sword and the scalpel—the 32. Martinez B, Biszewski M. Appendix 1: Osteo- osteopathic “war” to enter the Military Medi- pathic graduate medical education, 2015. J Am cal Corps: 1916-1966. J Am Osteopath Assoc. Osteopath Assoc. 2015;115:268-74. 1998;98(5):279-86.

FAMILY MEDICINE VOL. 49, NO. 5 • MAY 2017 377