The Coastguard, Emergency Towing Vessels and the Maritime Incident Response Group: Follow Up

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Coastguard, Emergency Towing Vessels and the Maritime Incident Response Group: Follow Up House of Commons Transport Committee The Coastguard, Emergency Towing Vessels and the Maritime Incident Response Group: follow up Sixth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 12 September, 22 October, 12, 26 November 2012 Published on 11 December 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Karen Lumley (Conservative, Redditch) Karl McCartney (Conservative, Lincoln) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton), Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South), Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North), Paul Maynard, (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys), Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co- operative, Luton South), Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge), Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at http://www.parliament.uk/transcom. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. The Reports of the Committee, the formal minutes relating to that report, oral evidence taken and some or all written evidence are available in a printed volume. Additional written evidence may be published on the internet only. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Mark Egan (Clerk), Farrah Bhatti (Second Clerk), Tony Catinella (Senior Committee Assistant), Adrian Hitchins (Committee Assistant), Stewart McIlvenna (Committee Support Assistant) and Hannah Pearce (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Transport Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6263; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] List of additional written evidence (published in Volume II on the Committee’s website www.parliament.uk/transcom) 1 Simon Dent Ev w1 2 Steve Sim Ev w1 3 Colin Tomlinson Ev w1 4 FIRE Project Ev w2 5 Clyde Branch of the PCS Ev w5 6 PCS member serving at MRCC Clyde Ev w9 7 Chris Jameson Ev w10 8 The Scottish Government Ev w13 9 National Coastguard SOS Campaign Group Ev w14 10 Ian McLean Ev w23 11 Toby Reynolds Ev w23 12 PCS Brixham Branch of the MCA Ev w24 13 Inverclyde Council Ev w25 14 Welsh Govenment Ev w27 15 Matthew Mace Ev w28 16 RNLI Ev w30 17 Louise Pooley and Mike Hillen Ev w30 18 Dennis Laird Ev w32 19 Outer Hebrides Coastguard Task Group Ev w32 20 Save Milford Haven Coastguard Campaign Ev w34 21 Murdo Macaulay Ev w36 22 Sandra Beech Ev w36 23 Martin Caton MP Ev w37 24 Richard Drax MP Ev w38 25 Dr Ian Mew Ev w42 cobber Pack: U PL: COE1 [SO] Processed: [07-12-2012 14:58] Job: 024874 Unit: PG01 Source: /MILES/PKU/INPUT/024874/024874_w025_michelle_SAR2-DrIanMew.xml Transport Committee: Evidence Ev w1 Written evidence Written evidence from Simon Dent (CFU 01) As a member of the public I am concerned that areas of the UK are going to be left without an adequate coastguard service by the governments proposed changes. The closure of 9 coastguard centres in my opinion could cause a delay in existing stations reaching emergencies putting lives at risk. Also news that these centres will close before the new facility is trialled and set up completely is quite alarming and will only add to people’s fears. People want to feel safe when around the UK coastline and knowing there is a local coastguard with knowledge of local tide information and the local area is vital to public confidence. I urge the committee to review the closure plans in the interest of public safety and review all reports again. August 2012 Written evidence from Steve Sim (CFU 02) As a volunteer CG for almost 38 years (20 as Station Officer) I feel I must comment on the changes which are happening to HMCG. We were told that the new CG would not effect the Rescue Service but after a short space of time it would seem the effects are already happening. In our area our training has been cut from 40 hours per year to 24 with a new line management system which is remote an inexperienced. CSM’s areas have become much larger, the decision making process has become less involved with the troops and I have to say communication between the front line and the management team is becoming less and less. I received an email to myself from our previous CSM of the smaller Liverpool District, explaining the hours allowed for training which was in answer to a question I placed. The answer was honest and I feel appropriate. It can be seen that this senior manager felt at the time that training hours were still not enough but had secured 31 hours nationally and an extra 10 hours for the area. Only this week we are told that the hours are now 24 per year, not enough to secure the safe health and safety of CRO’s who’s competencies get more arduous and detailed as the years go on. CRO’s undertake coastal rescue, with cliff mud and water rescue implications, the CRO and the casualty safety seem to be compromised with the cut in training. The agency has being shouting from the roof tops that extra full time staff will increase the skills of the CRO but less training hours and poor communication need to be addressed before the increased costs in the new management system of the CR Service. HMCG has been in my blood since I was 16 and as a volunteer have seen many changes, but it would seem that the present management are even more remote and listen even less. Perhaps you should take verbal evidence from some of the volunteers as the great Mrs Dunwoody did at Liverpool many years ago. A number of us gave evidence at the MRSC she listened to the coal face and was a delight to meet. August 2012 Written evidence from Colin Tomlinson (CFU 03) As a serving Coastguard Officer of more than 39 years I have witnessed many changes in the Service, and the closure of MRCCs has always been with us. In my time we have gone from over 300 coastguard stations to 28 Rescue centres down to 18 before the reorganization proposals. These proposals are a long time coming and the reorganisation should have been put into progress earlier rather than later. I am not sure I agree with the location of all those stations which are to remain open nor those that are set to close, nor do I agree with all of the closure proposals. However as the Manager of Yarmouth MRCC, I can honestly state that the work stream has indicated over the years a slowdown of coastal incidents to such an extent that we are running 50% less then we were five years ago. A large proportion of these incidents are now being dealt with by RNLI Lifeguards , a service that is saving lives each day. My view is that the closures are taking to long, staff at my station are now leaving to find new jobs, or remaining for the payout depending on their outlook and status. I have now the unenviable task of trying to keep morale high, with low staffing levels and staff that unless they move with the job will be out of work this time next year. It is my view that HMCG should strive to move forward as quickly as possible to ensure we retain as many staff as we can with the skills required for the new roles that they face. The world has moved on and the service needs to move on or stagnate. cobber Pack: U PL: COE1 [E] Processed: [07-12-2012 14:59] Job: 024874 Unit: PG01 Source: /MILES/PKU/INPUT/024874/024874_w025_michelle_SAR2-DrIanMew.xml Ev w2 Transport Committee: Evidence The CEO should be given full support from Government with a message that finance is available and provided to ensure we end up with a service for the future. August 2012 Written evidence from FIRE Project (CFU 04) 1. The maritime safety coverage of the British Isles and further waters is unusually rich but, changes, to any one part of that coverage, have the capacity to make a significant impact on the other organizations involved in saving life and increasing safety on water. In looking at a reduction of Coastguard Stations to save costs, there is need to consider how this service interacts with all of the other available SAR services, most of which are funded by the public and by corporate sponsorship and gifts. 2. The British Isles are fortunate in having the RNLI as an independent organization funded by donations and free of short-term political interference.
Recommended publications
  • Future Coastguard Consultation
    Protecting our Seas and Shores in the 21st Century Consultation on proposals for modernising the Coastguard 2010 Coastguard Modernisation Consultation Table of Contents Forewords........................................................................................................3 Executive Summary.........................................................................................7 How to Respond ............................................................................................10 Chapter 1: Protecting our Seas and Shores in the 21st century ....................12 Chapter 2: The Coastguard Today.................................................................14 Chapter 3: Modernising Structures and Systems...........................................19 Chapter 4: The Proposed Structure ...............................................................22 Chapter 5: Strengthening the Coastguard Rescue Service ...........................32 Chapter 6: Improving Efficiency and Value for Money ...................................37 Equality Impact Assessment..........................................................................40 What will happen next....................................................................................41 Annex A The Consultation Criteria................................................................42 Annex B : Glossary of Terms ........................................................................43 Annex C: List of Consultees..........................................................................46
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Prospectus
    The premier distance learning “I warmly recommend this MBA in Shipping & Logistics programme to all maritime specialists MBA for the maritime sector who want to improve their skills, knowledge and understanding of the shipping businesses.” Catalin-Valerica Ancau, AncelorMittal Steel Galati S.A. Detailed Prospectus Start date: 24th September 2012 Application deadline: 10th August 2012 Email: [email protected] Visit: www.mba4shipping.com Scan with QR app Tel: +44 (0)20 3377 3209 / +1 (646) 957 8929 Contents Welcome ................................................ 1 Programme Overview ............................ 2 Why Study this MBA? ............................ 2 Programme Structure ............................ 3 Business Transformation Project ........... 7 Welcome Merits of this MBA.................................. 8 Who Studies this MBA? ....................... 10 Welcome to the MBA in Shipping & Logistics, offered by Lloyd’s Maritime Academy Student Testimonials ............................11 and Middlesex University Business School. Our industry leading programme provides Studying by Distance Learning ............ 13 you with the essential personal and professional qualities required to propel your career into the realms of executive management, especially now that proficient and Programme Faculty ............................. 14 inspiring leaders are needed and valued more than ever. Fee & Commencement Information..... 18 Entry Requirements ............................. 18 Integrating traditional core MBA competencies such as strategic
    [Show full text]
  • North West Inshore and Offshore Marine Plan Areas
    Seascape Character Assessment for the North West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas MMO 1134: Seascape Character Assessment for the North West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas September 2018 Report prepared by: Land Use Consultants (LUC) Project funded by: European Maritime Fisheries Fund (ENG1595) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Version Author Note 0.1 Sally First draft desk-based report completed May 2015 Marshall Paul Macrae 1.0 Paul Macrae Updated draft final report following stakeholder consultation, August 2018 1.1 Chris MMO Comments Graham, David Hutchinson 2.0 Paul Macrae Final report, September 2018 2.1 Chris Independent QA Sweeting © Marine Management Organisation 2018 You may use and re-use the information featured on this website (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ to view the licence or write to: Information Policy Team The National Archives Kew London TW9 4DU Email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Marine Management Organisation Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Tel: 0300 123 1032 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/mmo Disclaimer This report contributes to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) evidence base which is a resource developed through a large range of research activity and methods carried out by both MMO and external experts. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of MMO nor are they intended to indicate how MMO will act on a given set of facts or signify any preference for one research activity or method over another.
    [Show full text]
  • MARITIME and COASTGUARD AGENCY Annual Report and Accounts 2008-09 Incorporating Our Plans for 2009-10 and Beyond
    MARITIME AND COASTGUARD AGENCY Annual Report and Accounts 2008-09 Incorporating our plans for 2009-10 and beyond Safer Lives Safer Ships Cleaner Seas 08/09 MARITIME AND COASTGUARD AGENCY Annual Report and Accounts 2008-09 Incorporating our plans for 2009-10 and beyond Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 7 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 16 July 2009 HC792 London: The Stationery Office £19.15 Our vision is to be a world-class organisation that is committed to preventing loss of life, continuously improving maritime safety, and protecting the marine environment: Safer lives, safer ships, cleaner seas Our shared core values are: Mutual respect and customer focus © Crown Copyright 2009 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please write to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 9780102961485 Contents 4 Chief Executive’s Foreword 6 Who We Are 10 Management Commentary 15 Safer Lives 20 Safer Ships 26 Cleaner Seas 28 Financial Review for the Year 30 Remuneration Report 35 Accounts 65 Annexes 82 2009-10 Ministerial Targets Chief Executive’s Foreword I am pleased to present the Maritime and got to grips with a new structure, and our Coastguard Agency’s Annual Report and coastal organisation was hit by strike action Accounts for 2008-2009, incorporating our in March, April, July and over the busy August plans for 2009-2010 and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Shipping and Navigation
    Manx Marine Environmental Assessment Infrastructure Shipping and Navigation Douglas Harbour. Photo: Isle of Man Steampacket MMEA Chapter 6.2 December 2013 Lead authors: Colin Finney - Department of Infrastructure Laura Hanley – Isle of Man Marine Plan Further contributions: Captain Kane Taha & Captain Chris Bowen – Isle of Man Steampacket Robin Tobin - Dohle/Mezeron Captain Stephen Carter - Laxey Towing Ltd. Dr Emma Rowan, Michael MacDonald, Stuart Temple, Dr Peter McEvoy - Department of Infrastructure David Morter, Graham Dugdale – Department of Economic Development Colin Eastwood - Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture Roy McClean – Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Royal Institute of Naval Architects (IMarEST, RINA) Isle of Man Joint Branch Volunteer members of Isle of Man Coastguard and Royal National Lifeboat Institute (RNLI). MMEA Chapter 6.2 – Infrastructure Manx Marine Environmental Assessment Version: December 2013 © Isle of Man Government, all rights reserved This document was produced as part of the Isle of Man Marine Plan Project, a cross Government Department project funded and facilitated by the Department of Infrastructure, Department of Economic Development and Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture. This document is downloadable from the Department of Infrastructure website at: http://www.gov.im/categories/planning-and-building-control/marine-planning/manx-marine- environmental-assessment/ For information about the Isle of Man Marine Plan Project please see: http://www.gov.im/categories/planning-and-building-control/marine-planning/ Contact: Manx Marine Environmental Assessment Isle of Man Marine Plan Project Planning & Building Control Division Department of Infrastructure Murray House, Mount Havelock Douglas, IM1 2SF Suggested Citations Chapter Finney, C., Hanley, L., Taha, K., Bowen, C., Tobin, R., Carter, S., Rowan, E., MacDonald, M., Temple, S., McEvoy, P., Morter, D., Dugdale, G., Eastwood, C., McClean, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Dev Strategy and A
    Plan for Fylde - Plan for the Future Fylde Council Fylde Local Plan Publication VersionEconomic Development June 2016Strategy and Action Plan Fylde Local Plan to 2032 – Publication version Preface Fylde consists of the classic seaside resort towns of Lytham and St Annes, the historic market town of Kirkham and the urban centres of Wesham, Warton and Freckleton; together with large areas of countryside and picturesque rural settlements. The Local Plan identifies the settlement hierarchy for Fylde at the end of the plan period in 2032. It is a destination in its own right for leisure, culture and tourism. Fylde is also an important part of the Lancashire economy – containing regionally significant business sectors including BAE Systems at Warton, (part of the internationally and nationally important Lancashire Advanced Engineering and Manufacturing Enterprise Zone), Blackpool Airport and its associated Enterprise Zone and the Westinghouse Springfields (Salwick) nuclear processing plant. It is vital that we manage, guide and encourage development within Fylde to meet the identified needs and aspirations of our local communities. The Local Plan identifies four Strategic Locations for Development which will be the focus for the level of housing development and economic growth required in Fylde up to the end of the plan period. The four Strategic Locations are: Lytham and St Annes; Fylde – Blackpool Periphery; Warton; and Kirkham and Wesham. To accommodate the level of development proposed, the Local Plan includes a masterplan policy for all of the Strategic Locations to ensure that new development on strategic sites is planned and delivered in an effective manner. The Publication version represents an important process in the preparation of the new Local Plan for Fylde.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Consultation Response Template Response Form The
    Public Consultation Response Template Response form the Commissioners of Irish Lights Introduction The Commissioners of Irish Lights is the General Lighthouse Authority throughout the island of Ireland, its adjacent seas and islands. It is the longest established maritime organisation in Ireland, delivering an essential safety service around these coasts, protecting the marine environment, and supporting the marine industry and coastal communities. Its mission, ‘Safe Navigation at Sea’, is to be a leading and innovative provider of reliable, efficient and cost effective navigation and maritime services for the safety of all. Irish Lights’ vision is to protect lives, property, trade and the environment by delivering next generation maritime services at the interface of navigation, technology, engineering and data management. Irish Lights provide services across the five Focus Areas contained in our 2018-23 strategy “Safe Seas; Connected Coasts”: Focus Area 1 - Provision of General Aids to Navigation around the island of Ireland Focus Area 2 - Local Aids & Other Navigation Services Focus Area 3 – Commercial Services Focus Area 4 - Value Added Services to contribute to the Wider Maritime Economy Focus Area 5 - Tourism, Heritage and Community Engagement Implicit in Focus Area 1 – General aids to navigation is the recognition that maritime aids to navigation (including terrestrial physical, visual, electronic, and satellite aids) are critical national infrastructure to maintain the supply and export lines into and out of Ireland. Maritime transport is the most important means of connecting Ireland to international markets, accounting for more than 90% of Ireland’s international trade in volume terms. The end of the Brexit transition period and the imposition of customs arrangements for goods entering Ireland, has highlighted the real need to protect these lines of supply.
    [Show full text]
  • MCA Framework Document
    FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT FOR THE MARITIME AND COASTGUARD AGENCY (MCA) June 2014 1 Contents THE AGENCY ............................................................................................................ 4 Main activities/responsibilities ................................................................................. 4 Location .................................................................................................................. 4 ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACCOUNTABILITY........................................... 4 The Secretary of State ............................................................................................ 4 The Permanent Secretary ....................................................................................... 5 Agency Owner ........................................................................................................ 6 Chief Executive ....................................................................................................... 6 MCA Executive Board ............................................................................................. 7 Secretary of State’s Representative (SOSREP) ..................................................... 7 Receiver of Wreck ................................................................................................... 8 Sponsor Divisions ................................................................................................... 8 Maritime Administration Board ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018Programme.Pdf
    Welcome to Tynwald Day The Midsummer sitting of Tynwald Court at St John’s is a ceremony with origins more than a thousand years old. Its central feature is the promulgation and captioning of new Acts of Tynwald, which is the final stage in the Manx legislative process. The ceremony is in three parts. It begins in the Royal Chapel with a service of worship at 11am. Then the Members of Tynwald and other participants move to Tynwald Hill where the Acts are promulgated and any petitions are brought forward. Finally, the Court returns to the Royal Chapel where the Acts are captioned. The Court of Tynwald in session Members of Tynwald Legislative Council The Hon S C Rodan, President of Tynwald The Right Reverend P A Eagles, Lord Bishop Mr J L M Quinn QC, HM Attorney General Miss T M August-Hanson Mrs M M Hendy Mr D C Cretney Mrs K A Lord-Brennan Mr T M Crookall Mrs K Sharpe Mr R W Henderson Mrs J P Poole-Wilson House of Keys The Hon J P Watterson, Speaker Mr R E Callister Mr J R Moorhouse Dr A J Allinson Hon A L Cannan Mr G R Peake Hon D J Ashford Mrs C A Corlett Mr M J Perkins Mr T S Baker Hon G D Cregeen Hon R H Quayle, Chief Minister Mrs K J Beecroft Ms J M Edge Mr C R Robertshaw Miss C L Bettison Hon R K Harmer Mr W C Shimmins Hon G G Boot Mr L L Hooper Hon L D Skelly Mrs D H P Caine Hon W M Malarkey Hon C C Thomas Officers of Tynwald Mr R I S Phillips, Clerk of Tynwald and Secretary of the House of Keys Mr J D C King, Deputy Clerk of Tynwald and Clerk of the Legislative Council Mrs J Corkish, Third Clerk of Tynwald The Ven Andrew Brown,
    [Show full text]
  • MSC-MEPC.6-CIRC.19 Annex
    MSC-MEPC.6/Circ.19 Annex, page 1 ANNEX LIST OF NATIONAL OPERATIONAL CONTACT POINTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RECEIPT, TRANSMISSION AND PROCESSING OF URGENT REPORTS ON INCIDENTS INVOLVING HARMFUL SUBSTANCES INCLUDING OIL FROM SHIPS TO COASTAL STATES 1 The following information is provided to enable compliance with regulation 37 of MARPOL Annex I which, inter alia, requires that the Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP) shall contain a list of authorities or persons to be contacted in the event of a pollution incident involving such substances. Requirements for oil pollution emergency plans and relevant oil pollution reporting procedures are contained in articles 3 and 4 of the 1990 OPRC Convention. 2 This information is also provided to enable compliance with regulation 17 of MARPOL Annex II which, inter alia, requires that the shipboard marine pollution emergency plans for oil and/or noxious liquid substances shall contain a list of authorities or persons to be contacted in the event of a pollution incident involving such substances. In this context, requirements for emergency plans and reporting for hazardous and noxious substances are also contained in article 3 of the 2000 OPRC-HNS Protocol. 3 Resolution MEPC.54(32), as amended by resolution MEPC.86(44), on the SOPEP Guidelines and resolution MEPC.85(44), as amended by resolution MEPC.137(53), on the Guidelines for the development of Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plans for Oil and/or Noxious Liquid Substances adopted by IMO require that these shipboard pollution emergency plans should include, as an appendix, the list of agencies or officials of administrations responsible for receiving and processing reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Fylde Local Plan to 2032
    Fylde Local Plan To 2032 October 2018 Fylde Local Plan to 2032 Preface Fylde consists of the classic seaside resort towns of Lytham and St Annes, the historic market town of Kirkham and the urban centres of Wesham, Warton and Freckleton; together with large areas of countryside and picturesque rural settlements. The Local Plan identifies the settlement hierarchy for Fylde at the end of the plan period in 2032. It is a destination in its own right for leisure, culture and tourism. Fylde is also an important part of the Lancashire economy – containing regionally significant business sectors including BAE Systems at Warton, (part of the internationally and nationally important Lancashire Advanced Engineering and Manufacturing Enterprise Zone), Blackpool Airport and its associated Enterprise Zone and the Westinghouse Springfields (Salwick) nuclear processing plant. It is vital that we manage, guide and encourage development within Fylde to meet the identified needs and aspirations of our local communities. The Local Plan identifies four Strategic Locations for Development which will be the focus for the level of housing development and economic growth required in Fylde up to the end of the plan period. The four Strategic Locations are: Lytham and St Annes; Fylde – Blackpool Periphery; Warton; and Kirkham and Wesham. To accommodate the level of development proposed, the Local Plan includes a masterplan policy for all of the Strategic Locations to ensure that new development on strategic sites is planned and delivered in an effective manner. This version of the Local Plan has been produced for Adoption, as the principal document of the statutory Development Plan for the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Sopep National Contact Points
    MSC-MEPC.6/Circ.18 Annex, page 1 ANNEX LIST OF NATIONAL OPERATIONAL CONTACT POINTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RECEIPT, TRANSMISSION AND PROCESSING OF URGENT REPORTS ON INCIDENTS INVOLVING HARMFUL SUBSTANCES, INCLUDING OIL FROM SHIPS TO COASTAL STATES 1 The following information is provided to enable compliance with Regulation 37 of MARPOL Annex I which, inter alia, requires that the Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP) shall contain a list of authorities or persons to be contacted in the event of a pollution incident involving such substances. Requirements for oil pollution emergency plans and relevant oil pollution reporting procedures are contained in Articles 3 and 4 of the 1990 OPRC Convention. 2 This information is also provided to enable compliance with Regulation 17 of MARPOL Annex II which, inter alia, requires that the shipboard marine pollution emergency plans for oil and/or noxious liquid substances shall contain a list of authorities or persons to be contacted in the event of a pollution incident involving such substances. In this context, requirements for emergency plans and reporting for hazardous and noxious substances are also contained in Article 3 of the 2000 OPRC-HNS Protocol. 3 Resolution MEPC.54(32), as amended by resolution MEPC.86(44), on the SOPEP Guidelines and resolution MEPC.85(44), as amended by resolution MEPC.137(53), on the Guidelines for the development of Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plans for Oil and/or Noxious Liquid Substances adopted by the IMO require that these shipboard pollution emergency plans should include, as an appendix, the list of agencies or officials of administrations responsible for receiving and processing reports.
    [Show full text]