DOCSLIB.ORG

Flora of Serbia and the Balkan Peninsula

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade, 59 (4), 387-396, 2007 DOI:10.2298/ABS0704387N NOMENCLATURAL AND TAXONOMIC NOTES ON THE FLORA OF SERBIA AND THE BALKAN PENINSULA. I. CARYOPHYLLACEAE M. NIKETIĆ1, V. STEVANOVIĆ2, and Gordana Tomović2 1Natural History Museum, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2Institute of Botany and Jevremovac Botanical Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Abstract — The nomenclatural analysis included 12 autochthonous and mostly endemic species from the genera Atocion Adans., Cerastium L., Heliosperma (Rchb.) Rchb., and Silene L. (Caryophyllaceae). In conformity with ICBN, 12 new infra- specific taxa are described with locus classicus on the territory of Serbia. Also presented are 24 new nomenclatural combi- nations, including several for endemic taxa not present in Serbia. The nomenclature of certain taxa is supplemented by a short taxonomic-chorological review. Results of these studies will be incorporated in the next volume of “Flora of Serbia”. Key words: Nomenclature, plant taxonomy, Caryophyllaceae, Serbia, Balkan Peninsula Udc 582.661.51(497.11):57.06 581.9 INTRODUCTION conditions are now suitable for starting a new edi- tion of Flora of Serbia, and the Committee for Flora The ten volume edition “Flora of Serbia” (Jo s i f o v i ć , and Vegetation of SASA accepted this challenge. The 1970-1976; 1977; S a r i ć and D i k l i ć , 1986) is a main intent of the new edition is to remove the defi- capital-value work of Serbian botany, filling a void ciencies of the first edition (non-uniform taxonomic that existed for almost more than a century in stud- principles in taxon studies, incomplete and/or false ies on the flora of this part of Balkan Peninsula, data on taxon distribution, failure to utilize relevant more precisely since the publishing of Pančić’s “Flora modern taxonomic literature, failure to check her- of the Principality of Serbia” and its “Addendum” barium material, etc.). The first volume of the new (Pančić, 1874; 1884). “Flora of Serbia” was finished in an unusually short time for this type of large-scale edition of Flora of Serbia was published in 1992, and synthetic work. It united mostly fresh knowledge on the second one is planned, after a long break, for taxonomy, distribution and ecological preferences of 2008. It will include the orders Ranales (continuing taxa that were known since Pančić’s time, as well as with fam. Berberidaceae), Papaverales, Urticales, the many new ones recorded within the boundaries Fagales, Betulales, Juglandales, and Caryophyllales. of modern Serbia. “Flora of Serbia” initiated inten- The manuscript of the second volume of the new sive floristic and chorological studies of the vascular edition was prepared ten years ago, but unfortunately flora in Serbia during the last 30 years. Since 1986, the publishing procedure was never initiated. More immense quantities of fresh material have been col- than 15 years have passed since the first edition, lected on distribution, taxonomy and ecology of and numerous papers have appeared in the mean- plant taxa; new monographs on genera have been time in the European botanical literature, including published; new regional floras have been issued for new nomenclatural and taxonomic principles which the Balkan countries; and new nomenclatural prin- should be incorporated in the new, expanded manu- ciples have been accepted in European plant taxon- script of the second volume. The main goal of this omy, elucidating in a new way the validity and taxo- paper was to, through new interpretation of certain nomic position of species and genera. Altogether, taxonomic challenges, facilitate the use of synonyms 387 388 M. NIKETIĆ and V. STEVANOVIĆ in the next volume of the second edition of Flora (1999), are continued here, with the accent on sepa- of Serbia. Certain new taxa and nomenclatural rating subspecies within the species C. decalvans combinations are here mentioned for the first time, Schlosser & Vuk. (subsp. glutinosum and subsp. and in the mentioned publication they will be indi- leontopodium). vidually presented within the completely processed genera and species of the family Caryophyllaceae. MATERIAL AND METHODS This paper deals with certain representatives of the genera Atocion Adans., Cerastium L., Heliosperma The study of 12 investigated species is based (Rchb.) Rchb. and Silene L., which were presented on the examination of available herbarium mate- in the previous edition of Flora of Serbia by G a j i ć rial (BEO, BEOU, LJU, SARA, UPA, SO, SOM). (1970: 156-176) and S l a v n i ć (1970: 204-240). In A������������������������������������������cronyms follow Index Herbariorum (Holmgren order to fully present the infraspecific variability of et al., 1990; and http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/ certain species, we have included new combinations IndexHerbariorum.asp). ������������������Synonymization and for some endemic subspecies that do not appear on description of new taxa were done in conformity the territory of Serbia but are closely related to taxa with ICBN (McNeill et al., 2006) and are based on analyzed in Flora of Serbia. Basic data on distribu- surveyed herbarium material and published data. tion are included for newly described taxa. Abbreviations — Cro Croatia, BiH Bosnia and During the last decade, there has been a great Herzegovina, Mtg Montenegro, Ser Serbia, Al improvement in understanding of the phylogeny Albania, Ma Macedonia, Bu Bulgaria, Gr Greece. and classification of taxa within the tribe Sileneae RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (Caryophyllaceae) (O x e l m a n and L i d e n , 1995; O x e l m a n et al., 1997; O x e l m a n et al., 2001; Atocion Adans. F r a j m a n and O x e l m a n , 2004, 2007; Ni k e t i ć and S t e v a n o v i ć , 2007). There are clear defini- Atocion armeria (L.) Raf. var. lithuanicum (Zapal.) tions of monophyletic lines that are genetically Niketić & Stevanović, comb. nova; S. lithuanica and morphologically distinct from other genera, Zapal., Consp. Fl. Galic. Crit. 3: 181 (1911) [basion.]; primarily from the genus Silene (although until Silene armeria var. lithuanica (Zapal.) Graebner recently they were considered an integral part of & Graebner fil. in Ascherson & Graebner, Syn. that genus). This is particularly true of the genera Mitteleur. Fl. 5(2): 154 (1920). Atocion, Heliosperma, Eudianthe (Rchb.) Rchb. and Viscaria Bernh. On the other hand, certain taxa Atocion armeria (L.) Raf. var. sparsiflorum (Schur) which were considered as belonging to separate gen- Niketić & Stevanović, comb. nova; Silene armeria era are now added to the genus Silene – for example var. sparsiflora Schur, Enum. Pl. Transs.: 105 (1866) Silene baccifera (L.) Roth, which used to be known [basion.]. as Cucubalus baccifer L. It was therefore necessary Atocion lerchenfeldianum (Baumg.) M. Popp var. to assign new combinations to certain infraspecific macedonicum (Form.) Niketić & Stevanović comb. taxa within the genera Atocion and Heliosperma, but nova; Silene macedonica Form. in Verh. Naturf. Ver. also within the genus Silene, if they were previously Brünn 31: 183 (1894) [basion.]; Silene lerchenfeldi- absent. This was not done only for formal reasons, ana var. macedonica (Form.) Bornm. in Bot. Jahrb. but also due to the need to, as much as possible, 59: 409 (1924). elucidate numerous taxonomic and chorological problems. Several new taxa are therefore described Cerastium L. on this occasion. Cerastium banaticum (Rochel) Steudel f. adenotri- Additionally, activities of describing and inter- chum (Čelak.) Niketić, stat. nov.; C. adenotrichum preting the very complicated infraspecific variability Čelak in Österr. Bot. Zeitschr. 37: 338 (1887) [basi- within the genus Cerastium, started by Ni k e t i ć on.]; C. banaticum var. adenotrichum (Čelak.) Borza NOTES ON THE FLORA OF SERBIA AND THE BALKAN PENINSULA. I. CARYOPHYLLACEAE 389 in Bot. Közl. 12: 63 (1913). (Holotypus: 160 BEOU). - Formae robusto valde simile sed inflorescentia eglandulosa.BiH, Mtg, Ser, Cerastium banaticum (Rochel) Steudel f. glan- Ma. duliusculum Niketić, f. nova - Typus: Flora ser- bica: Homoljske Planine Mts.: Ms Vukan, in saxosis, f. bogdanovicii Niketić, f. nova - Typus: Flora ser- alt. ca. 2000-2200 m, leg. V. Nikolić 12-Jul-1956 bica: Užice: in fauce ad rivam Djetina, in rupestribus (Holotypus: 116 BEO). - Bracteae et calyces hirsuti, calcareis, leg. N. Diklić, M. Bogdanović, 20-May- glandulis sparsis, brevibus obsiti. Ser, Bu, Gr. 1974 (Holotypus: 111 BEO). - Formae baldaccio valde simile, etiam folia glanduloso-pilosa. BiH, Cerastium decalvans Schlosser & Vuk. subsp. decal- Ser. vans Cerastium decalvans Schlosser & Vuk. subsp. glu- f. pauciflorum (G. Beck) Niketić, comb. in stat. tinosum (Strid) Niketić, comb. nova; C. moesiacum nov.; C. lanigerum f. pauciflorum G. Beck in Glasn. f. halacsyi Borza in Bot. Közl. 12: 57 (1913); C. Muz. Bosn. Herceg. 18: 483 (1906) [basion.]; Hayek moesiacum var. halacsyi (Borza) Graebner & Corr. in Feddes Repert. (Beih.) 30(1): 206 (1924); C. lani- in Aschers. & Graebner, Syn. Mitteleur. Fl. 5(1): 588 gerum subsp. minutum Georgiev in God. Sof. Univ. (1917); C. moesiacum f. thasium Hayek in Feddes 13: 421 (1935); C. decalvans f. minutum (Georgiev) Repert. (Beih.) 30(1): 207 (1924) [nom. illeg.]; C. Niketić in Glasn. Prir. Muz., Ser. B 49-50: 43 (1999); arvense var. bornmuellerianum Stoj. & Kitanov in C. decalvans var. pauciflorum (G. Beck) Niketić op. God. Sof. Univ. 41(3): 358 (1945-1946); C. moe- c.: 46 (1999). siacum subsp. glutinosum Strid in Strid & Tan, Fl. Hellen. 1: 202 (1997) [basion.]; C. decalvans var. f. rudskii Niketić, f. nova - Typus: Flora serbica: halacsyi (Borza) Niketić in Glasn. Prir. Muz., Ser. B Prokletije Mt. (Mt. Visitor), in pratis, alt. ca. 2000- 49-50: 44 (1999); „C. alpinum var. glutinosum“ sensu 2200 m, leg. P. Černjavski, I. Rudski, 26-Jul-1933, Halácsy in Österr. Bot. Z. 42(12): 414 (1892), non sub “C. decalvans”, rev.
Recommended publications
  • The Distribution and Host Range of Thecaphora Melandrii, with First Records for Britain

    The Distribution and Host Range of Thecaphora Melandrii, with First Records for Britain

    KEW BULLETIN (2020) 75:39 ISSN: 0075-5974 (print) DOI 10.1007/S12225-020-09895-3 ISSN: 1874-933X (electronic) The distribution and host range of Thecaphora melandrii, with first records for Britain Paul A. Smith1 , Matthias Lutz2 & Marcin Piątek3 Summary. Thecaphora melandrii (Syd.) Vánky & M.Lutz infects species in the Caryophyllacaeae forming sori with spore balls in the floral organs. We report new finds from Britain, supported by phylogenetic analysis, that confirm its occurrence on Silene uniflora Roth. We review published and web accessible records and note the relatively few records of this smut, its sparse distribution, confined to Europe but scattered predominantly from central to eastern Europe. Analysis of the rDNA ITS and 28S sequences demonstrates little variability among specimens, even those parasitising different host genera, which suggests that the species has evolved relatively recently. Some Microbotryum species infect the same host plants, and we found two species, M. lagerheimii Denchev and M. silenes- inflatae (DC. ex Liro) G.Deml & Oberw., in the same locations as T. melandrii, identified by morphology and molecular phylogenetic analysis. These species may form a stable multi-species community of parasites of Silene uniflora. Key Words. Caryophyllaceae, gall, Glomosporiaceae, Microbotryum, Silene uniflora, smut. Introduction Caryophyllaceae, and specifically on T. melandrii (Syd.) The Caryophyllaceae is a large family of dicotyledonous Vánky & M.Lutz. Vánky (2012) lists five species of plants (Greenberg & Donoghue 2011), and its species Thecaphora with hosts in this family, all destroying the are hosts for many plant-parasitic microfungi, among inner floral organs; most remain within the outer floral them at least 38 species of smut fungi assigned to the envelope (the calyx), but T.
  • Untangling Phylogenetic Patterns and Taxonomic Confusion in Tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with Special Focus on Generic

    Untangling Phylogenetic Patterns and Taxonomic Confusion in Tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with Special Focus on Generic

    TAXON 67 (1) • February 2018: 83–112 Madhani & al. • Phylogeny and taxonomy of Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) Untangling phylogenetic patterns and taxonomic confusion in tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with special focus on generic boundaries Hossein Madhani,1 Richard Rabeler,2 Atefeh Pirani,3 Bengt Oxelman,4 Guenther Heubl5 & Shahin Zarre1 1 Department of Plant Science, Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran 2 University of Michigan Herbarium-EEB, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-2228, U.S.A. 3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91775-1436, Mashhad, Iran 4 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden 5 Biodiversity Research – Systematic Botany, Department of Biology I, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Menzinger Str. 67, 80638 München, Germany; and GeoBio Center LMU Author for correspondence: Shahin Zarre, [email protected] DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/671.6 Abstract Assigning correct names to taxa is a challenging goal in the taxonomy of many groups within the Caryophyllaceae. This challenge is most serious in tribe Caryophylleae since the supposed genera seem to be highly artificial, and the available morphological evidence cannot effectively be used for delimitation and exact determination of taxa. The main goal of the present study was to re-assess the monophyly of the genera currently recognized in this tribe using molecular phylogenetic data. We used the sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the chloroplast gene rps16 for 135 and 94 accessions, respectively, representing all 16 genera currently recognized in the tribe Caryophylleae, with a rich sampling of Gypsophila as one of the most heterogeneous groups in the tribe.
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report

    Floristic Quality Assessment Report

    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
  • Genomic and Metagenomic Analyses Reveal Parallel Ecological Divergence in Heliosperma Pusillum (Caryophyllaceae)

    Genomic and Metagenomic Analyses Reveal Parallel Ecological Divergence in Heliosperma Pusillum (Caryophyllaceae)

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/044354; this version posted March 17, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Genomic and Metagenomic Analyses Reveal Parallel Ecological Divergence in Heliosperma pusillum (Caryophyllaceae) Emiliano Trucchi1*, Božo Frajman2, Thomas H.A. Haverkamp3, Peter Schönswetter2,§, Ovidiu Paun1,§ 1Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria 2Institute of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria 3Department of Biosciences, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway *Corresponding author: [email protected] §Shared last authors. Abstract Cases of parallel ecological divergence in closely related taxa offer an invaluable material to study the processes of ecological speciation. Applying a combination of population genetic and metagenomic tools on a high-coverage RAD sequencing dataset, we test for parallel evolution across six population pairs of Heliosperma pusillum and H. veselskyi (Caryophyllaceae), two plant species found in the south-eastern Alps and characterized by clear morphological (glabrous vs. hairy) and ecological (alpine vs. montane, wet vs. dry) differentiation. Our analyses support a scenario of multiple independent instances of divergence between these species during the last 10,000 years. Structure analyses and simulations show that interspecific gene flow in each population pair is very low. A single locus, annotated as E3 ubiquitin ligase, an enzyme involved in plant innate immunity, shows a pattern of non-random segregation across populations of both species.
  • Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae)

    Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae)

    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 328 Taxonomy and Reticulate Phylogeny of Heliosperma and Related Genera (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae) BOžO FRAJMAN ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-6946-7 2007 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8171 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Lindahlsalen, EBC, Norbyvägeb 18A, Uppsala, Thursday, September 27, 2007 at 10:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Frajman, B. 2007. Taxonomy and Reticulate Phylogeny of Heliosperma and Related Genera (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae). Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 328. 34 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-554-6946-7. Heliosperma (nom. cons prop.) comprises 15—20 taxa, most of them endemic to the Balkan Peninsula. DNA sequences from the chloroplast (rps16 intron, psbE-petG spacer) and the nuclear genome (ITS and four putatively unlinked RNA polymerase genes) are used to elucidate phylogenetic relationships within Heliosperma, and its position within Sileneae. Three main lineages are found within Heliosperma: Heliosperma alpestre, H. macranthum and the H. pusillum-clade. The relationships among the lineages differ between the plastid and the nuclear trees. Relative dates are used to discriminate among inter- and intralineage processes causing such incongruences, and ancient homoploid hybridisation is the most likely explanation. The chloroplast data strongly support two, geographically correlated clades in the H. pusillum-group, whereas the relationships appear poorly resolved by the ITS data, when analysed under a phylogenetic tree model. However, a network analysis finds a geographic structuring similar to that in the chloroplast data.
  • Pucciniomycotina: Microbotryum) Reflect Phylogenetic Patterns of Their Caryophyllaceous Hosts

    Pucciniomycotina: Microbotryum) Reflect Phylogenetic Patterns of Their Caryophyllaceous Hosts

    Org Divers Evol (2013) 13:111–126 DOI 10.1007/s13127-012-0115-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Contrasting phylogenetic patterns of anther smuts (Pucciniomycotina: Microbotryum) reflect phylogenetic patterns of their caryophyllaceous hosts Martin Kemler & María P. Martín & M. Teresa Telleria & Angela M. Schäfer & Andrey Yurkov & Dominik Begerow Received: 29 December 2011 /Accepted: 2 October 2012 /Published online: 6 November 2012 # Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2012 Abstract Anther smuts in the genus Microbotryum often is a factor that should be taken into consideration in delimitat- show very high host specificity toward their caryophyllaceous ing species. Parasites on Dianthus showed mainly an arbitrary hosts, but some of the larger host groups such as Dianthus are distribution on Dianthus hosts, whereas parasites on other crucially undersampled for these parasites so that the question Caryophyllaceae formed well-supported monophyletic clades of host specificity cannot be answered conclusively. In this that corresponded to restricted host groups. The same pattern study we sequenced the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) was observed in the Caryophyllaceae studied: morphological- region of members of the Microbotryum dianthorum species ly described Dianthus species did not correspond well with complex as well as their Dianthus hosts. We compared phy- monophyletic clades based on molecular data, whereas other logenetic trees of these parasites including sequences of anther Caryophyllaceae mainly did. We suggest that these different smuts from other Caryophyllaceae, mainly Silene,withphy- patterns primarily result from different breeding systems and logenies of Caryophyllaceae that are known to harbor anther speciation times between different host groups as well as smuts. Additionally we tested whether observed patterns in difficulties in species delimitations in the genus Dianthus.
  • Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment

    Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment

    Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri.
  • Tracheophyte of Xiao Hinggan Ling in China: an Updated Checklist

    Tracheophyte of Xiao Hinggan Ling in China: an Updated Checklist

    Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e32306 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e32306 Taxonomic Paper Tracheophyte of Xiao Hinggan Ling in China: an updated checklist Hongfeng Wang‡§, Xueyun Dong , Yi Liu|,¶, Keping Ma | ‡ School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China § School of Food Engineering Harbin University, Harbin, China | State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China ¶ University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Corresponding author: Hongfeng Wang ([email protected]) Academic editor: Daniele Cicuzza Received: 10 Dec 2018 | Accepted: 03 Mar 2019 | Published: 27 Mar 2019 Citation: Wang H, Dong X, Liu Y, Ma K (2019) Tracheophyte of Xiao Hinggan Ling in China: an updated checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e32306. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e32306 Abstract Background This paper presents an updated list of tracheophytes of Xiao Hinggan Ling. The list includes 124 families, 503 genera and 1640 species (Containing subspecific units), of which 569 species (Containing subspecific units), 56 genera and 6 families represent first published records for Xiao Hinggan Ling. The aim of the present study is to document an updated checklist by reviewing the existing literature, browsing the website of National Specimen Information Infrastructure and additional data obtained in our research over the past ten years. This paper presents an updated list of tracheophytes of Xiao Hinggan Ling. The list includes 124 families, 503 genera and 1640 species (Containing subspecific units), of which 569 species (Containing subspecific units), 56 genera and 6 families represent first published records for Xiao Hinggan Ling. The aim of the present study is to document an updated checklist by reviewing the existing literature, browsing the website of National Specimen Information Infrastructure and additional data obtained in our research over the past ten years.
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition

    Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition

    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
  • WRA Species Report

    WRA Species Report

    Family: Caryophyllaceae Taxon: Silene armeria Synonym: NA Common Name: sweet William catchfly Sweet William campion Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: H(HPWRA) Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 7 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- Low substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- Low high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 n 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 406 Host for recognized
  • PUBLICATION LIST Božo Frajman

    PUBLICATION LIST Božo Frajman

    PUBLICATION LIST Božo Frajman Scientific articles in SCI journals 1. Frajman, B., Rabeler, R. K. (2006) Proposal to conserve the name Heliosperma against Ixoca (Caryophyllaceae, Sileneae). Taxon 55: 807–808. 2. Frajman, B., Oxelman, B. (2007) Reticulate phylogenetics and phytogeographical structure of Heliosperma (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae) inferred from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 140–155. 3. Manel, S., Berthoud, F., Bellemain, E., Gaudeul, M., Luikart, G., Swenson, J. E., Waits, L. P., Taberlet, P., & Intrabiodiv-Consortium1 (2007) A new individual-based spatial approach for identifying genetic discontinuities in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 16: 2031–2043. 4. Ehrich, D., Gaudeul, M., Assefa, A., Koch, M. A., Mummenhof, K., Nemomissa, S., Intrabiodiv- Consortium1, & Brochmann, C. (2007) Genetic consequences of Pleistocene range shifts: Contrast between the Arctic, the Alps and the East African mountains. Molecular Ecology, 16: 2542–2559. 5. Frajman, B. (2007) Proposal to reject the name Cucubalus quadrifidus (Heliosperma quadrifidum, Silene quadrifida) (Caryophyllaceae, Sileneae). Taxon 56: 260–261. 6. Frajman, B., Schönswetter, P (2008) Notes on some rare Orobanche and Phelipanche species (Orobanchaceae) in Croatia. Acta Botanica Croatica 67: 103-107. 7. Schneeweiss, G. M., Frajman, B., Dakskobler, I. (2009) Orobanche lycoctoni Rhiner (Orobanchaceae), a poorly known species of the Central European flora. Candollea (Genève), 64: 91–99. 8. Frajman, B., Eggens, F., Oxelman, B. (2009) Hybrid origins and homoploid reticulate evolution within Heliosperma (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae)-a multigene phylogenetic approach with relative dating. Systematic Biology 58: 328–345. 9. Frajman, B., Schneeweiss, G. M. (2009) A campanulaceous fate : the albanian stenoendemic Asyneuma comosiforme in fact belongs to isophyllous Campanula.
  • Caryophyllaceae.Pdf

    Caryophyllaceae.Pdf

    Flora of China 6: 1–113. 2001. CARYOPHYLLACEAE 石竹科 shi zhu ke Lu Dequan (鲁德全)1, Wu Zhengyi (吴征镒 Wu Cheng-yih)2, Zhou Lihua (周丽华)2, Chen Shilong (陈世龙)3; Michael G. Gilbert4, Magnus Lidén5, John McNeill6, John K. Morton7, Bengt Oxelman8, Richard K. Rabeler9, Mats Thulin8, Nicholas J. Turland10, Warren L. Wagner11 Herbs annual or perennial, rarely subshrubs or shrubs. Stems and branches usually swollen at nodes. Leaves opposite, decussate, rarely alternate or verticillate, simple, entire, usually connate at base; stipules scarious, bristly, or often absent. Inflorescence of cymes or cymose panicles, rarely flowers solitary or few in racemes, capitula, pseudoverticillasters, or umbels. Flowers actinomorphic, bisexual, rarely unisexual, occasionally cleistogamous. Sepals (4 or)5, free, imbricate, or connate into a tube, leaflike or scarious, persistent, sometimes bracteate below calyx. Petals (4 or)5, rarely absent, free, often comprising claw and limb; limb entire or split, usually with coronal scales at juncture of claw and limb. Stamens (2–)5–10, in 1 or 2 series. Pistil 1; carpels 2–5, united into a compound ovary. Ovary superior, 1-loculed or basally imperfectly 2–5-loculed. Gynophore present or absent. Placentation free, central, rarely basal; ovules (1 or) few or numerous, campylotropous. Styles (1 or)2–5, sometimes united at base. Fruit usually a capsule, with pericarp crustaceous, scarious, or papery, dehiscing by teeth or valves 1 or 2 × as many as styles, rarely berrylike with irregular dehiscence or an achene. Seeds 1 to numerous, reniform, ovoid, or rarely dorsiventrally compressed, abaxially grooved, blunt, or sharply pointed, rarely fimbriate-pectinate; testa granular, striate or tuberculate, rarely smooth or spongy; embryo strongly curved and surrounding perisperm or straight but eccentric; perisperm mealy.