Environmental Impact Assessment for Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas Transportation Pipeline (196.14 Km) with Associated Facilities

DRAFT REPORT Environmental Impact Assessment for Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities

in state of Gujarat

[Length: 196.14 km Cat. A] nd (ToR File No. F. No. J-11011/144/2016-IA.II(I) dated 2 August, 2016)

Project Proponent:

M/S GUJARAT STATE PETRONET LIMITED EIA CONSULTANT

QCI-NABET Accredited EIA Consultant for Oil & Gas Transportation Pipeline Sector, MoEF&CC (GOI) and NABL Recognized Laboratory ISO 9001:2008, ISO 14001:2004, OHSAS 18001:2007 60, Bajiprabhu Nagar, Nagpur - 440 033, MS Lab. & Consultancy: FP-34, 35, Food Park, MIDC, Butibori, Nagpur – 441122 Ph.: (0712) 2242077, 9373287475 Email: [email protected], [email protected] website: www.anaconlaboratories.com Report No. ANqr /PD/20A/2015/48

INDEX

SR. NO. TITLE Pages

1 OCI NABET CETIFICATE 1

2 EIA REPORT PREFACE 1

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-19

4 CH.1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 to 1.11

5 CH.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1 to 2-21

6 CH.3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT 3-1 to 3-97

7 CH.4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND 4-1 to 4.24

MITIGATION MEASURES

8 CH.5 TECHNOLOGY ALTERNATIVES 5-1 to 5-4

9 CH.6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN 6-1 to 6-9

10 CH.7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES 7-1 to7-57

11 CH.8 PROJECT BENEFIT 8-1 to 8-2

12 CH. 9 ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT 9-1 to 9-1

13 CH. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 10-1 to 10-18

14 CH. 11 JUSTIFICATION & CONCLUSION 11-1 to 11-4

15 CH.12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT 12-1 to 12-8

16 ANNEXURES I to XIX

LIST OF ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE NO. ANNEXURE NAME PAGE NO. Annexure I : PNGRB Authorization 1 to 5 Annexure II : ToR letter 1 to 3 Annexure III : CRZ map 1 Annexure IV : Gujarat Government Gazette Notification 1 Annexure V : Gujarat Government Gazette Notification Extra Ordinary 1 Annexure VI : Environmental Standards 1 to 11 Table 1 : List of Instruments used for sampling & analysis 1 1.1 : Air Environment 2 Table 1 : National ambient air quality standards 2 Table 2 : Monitored parameters and frequency of sampling 3 Table 3 : Techniques used for ambient air quality monitoring 3 Table 4 : Sensitivity of meteorology monitoring equipment 4 1.2 : Water Environment 5 Table 1 : Sampling and handling of test samples 5 Table 2 : Standard operating procedures (SOP) for water and wastewater 5 sampling and analysis Table 3 : Analytical techniques for water and wastewater sampling and 6 analysis Table 4 : Ground water quality standards 7 Table 5 : Waste water discharge standards 8 1.3 : Soil Environment 9 Table 1 : Analytical techniques for soil analysis 9 Table 2 : Soil analysis parameter and unit 9 Table 3 : Standard soil classification 10 1.4 : Noise Environment 11 Table 1 : Ambient noise standards 11 Table 2 : Standard for occupational exposure 11 Annexure VII : AAQ Details 1 to 3 Annexure VIII : Landuse Study 1 to 64 Figure 1 : LULC of 2 km radius of SV-01-Gala-Morbi Area 4 Figure 2 : FCC of 2 km radius of SV-01-Gala-Morbi Area 4 Figure 3 : distribution of LULC studies of SV-01-Gala-Morbi Area 5 Figure 4 : LULC of 2 km radius of SV-02-Haripar Area 6 Figure 5 : FCC of 2 km radius of SV-02-Haripar Area 7 Figure 6 : distribution of LULC studies of SV-02-Haripar Area 8 Figure 7 : LULC of 2 km radius of SV-03-Nava Katariya Area 9 Figure 8 : FCC OF 2 Km Radius Of SV-03-Nava Katariya Area 9 Figure 9 : Distribution Of LULC Studies of SV-03-Nava-Katariya Area 10 Figure10 : LULC of 2 km radius of SV-04-Vondh Area 11 Figure 11 : FCC OF 2 km radius of SV-04-Vondh Area 12 Figure 12 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Sv-04-Vondh Area 13 Figure 13 : LULC OF 2 km radius of SV-05-Bhimasar Area 14 Figure 14 : FCC OF 2 km radius of SV-05-Bhimasar Area 14 Figure 15 : Distribution Of LULC studies of SV-05-Bhimasar Area 15 Figure 16 : LULC of 2 km radius of SV-06-Jetparda Area 16 Figure 17 : FCC OF 2 km radius of SV-06-Jetparda Area 17 Figure 18 : Distribution Of LULC studies of SV-06-Jetparda Area 18 Figure 19 : LULC OF 2 km radius of SV-07-Naavgaam Area 19 Figure 20 : FCC OF 2 KM radius of SV-07-Naavgaam Area 19 Figure 21 : Distribution Of LULC studies of SV-07-Naavgaam Area 20 Figure 22 : LULC Of 2 Km Radius Of SV-08-Ratanpar Area 21 Figure 23 : FCC OF 2 km radius of SV-08-Ratanpar Area 22 Figure 24 : Distribution Of LULC studies of SV-08-Ratanpar Area 23 Figure 25 : LULC of stretch 01 -10km distance under the area Ratanpar 24 ANNEXURE NO. ANNEXURE NAME PAGE NO. Figure 26 : FCC Of Stretch 01 -10km Distance Under The Area Ratanpar 24 Figure 27 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Stretch 01 -10km Distance 25 Under The Area Ratanpar Figure 28 : LULC Of Stretch 02 -10km Distance Under The Area Iswariya 26 Figure 29 : FCC Of Stretch 02 -10km Distance Under The Area Iswariya 26 Figure 30 : Distribution of LULC studies of stretch 02 -10km distance under 27 the area Iswariya Figure 31 : LULC of stretch 03 -10km distance under the area Ranipat 28 Figure 32 : FCC of stretch 03 -10km distance under the area Ranipat 28 Figure 33 : Distribution Of LULC studies of stretch 03 -10km distance under 29 the area Ranipat Figure 34 : LULC of stretch 04 -10km distance under the area Sagadhra 30 Figure 35 : FCC of stretch 04 -10km distance under the area Sagadhra 30 Figure 36 : Distribution Of LULC studies of stretch 04 -10km distance under 31 the area Sagadhra Figure 37 : LULC of stretch 05 -10km distance under the area Khetardi 32 Figure 38 : FCC of stretch 05 -10km distance under the area Khetardi 32 Figure 39 : Distribution Of LULC studies of stretch 05 -10km distance under 33 the area Khetardi Figure 40 : LULC of stretch 06 -10km distance under the area Wankiya 34 Figure 41 : FCC of stretch 06 -10km distance under the area WANKIYA 35 Figure 42 : Distribution Of LULC studies of stretch 05 -10km distance under 36 the area Wankiya Figure 43 : LULC of stretch 07 -10 km distance under the area Vankda 36 Figure 44 : FCC of stretch 07 -10km distance under the area Vankda 37 Figure 45 : Distribution Of LULC studies of stretch 07 -10km distance under 38 the area Vankda Figure 46 : LULC of stretch 08 -10km distance under the area Jivapar 38 Figure 47 : FCC of stretch 08 -10km distance under the area Jivapar 39 Figure 48 : Distribution Of LULC studies of stretch 08 -10km distance under 40 the area Jivapar Figure 49 : LULC of stretch 09 -10km distance under the area Piludi 40 Figure 50 : FCC of stretch 09 -10km distance under the area Piludi 41 Figure 51 : Distribution Of LULC studies of stretch 09 -10km distance under 42 the area Piludi Figure 52 : LULC Of Stretch 10 -10km Distance Under The Area Khiri 42 Figure 53 : FCC Of Stretch 10 -10km Distance Under The Area Khiri 43 Figure 54 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Stretch 10 -10km Distance 44 Under The Area Khiri Figure 55 : LULC of stretch 11 -10km distance under the area Haripar 44 Figure 56 : FCC Of Stretch 11 -10km Distance Under The Area Haripar 45 Figure 57 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Stretch 11 -10km Distance 46 Under The Area Haripar Figure 58 : LULC Of Stretch 12 -10 Km Distance Under The Area Shikarpur 46 Figure 59 : FCC Of Stretch 12 -10km Distance Under The Area Shikarpur 47 Figure 60 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Stretch 12 -10km Distance 48 Under The Area Shikarpur Figure 61 : LULC Of Stretch 13 -10km Distance Under The Area Nava- 48 Katariya Figure 62 : FCC Of Stretch 13 -10 Km Distance Under The Area Nava- 49 Katariya Figure 63 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Stretch 13 -10km Distance 50 Under The Area Nava-Katariya Figure 64 : LULC Of Stretch 14 -10km Distance Under The Area Chhodwala 50 Figure 65 : FCC Of Stretch 14 -10km Distance Under The Area Chhodwala 51 Figure 66 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Stretch 14 -10km Distance 52 ANNEXURE NO. ANNEXURE NAME PAGE NO. Under The Area Chhodwala Figure 67 : LULC Of Stretch 15 -10km Distance Under The Area Karmaria 52 Figure 68 : FCC Of Stretch 15 -10km Distance Under The Area Karmaria 53 Figure 69 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Stretch 15 -10km Distance 54 Under The Area Karmaria Figure 70 : LULC Of Stretch 16 -10 Km Distance Under The Area Sikra 54 Figure 71 : FCC Of Stretch 16 -10 Km Distance Under The Area Sikra 55 Figure 72 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Stretch 16 -10km Distance 56 Under The Area Sikra Figure 73 : LULC Of Stretch 17 -10 Km Distance Under The Area Sukhpar 56 Figure 74 : FCC Of Stretch 17 -10 Km Distance Under The Area Sukhpar 57 Figure 75 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Stretch 17 -10km Distance 58 Under The Area Sukhpar Figure 76 : LULC Of Stretch 18 -10 Km Distance Under The Area Bhimasar 58 Figure 77 : FCC Of Stretch 18 -10 Km Distance Under The Area Bhimasar 59 Figure 78 : distribution of LULC Studies Of Stretch 18 -10km Distance Under 60 The Area Bhimasar Figure 79 : LULC Of Stretch 19 -10 Km Distance Under The Area 60 Gopalnagar Figure 80 : FCC Of Stretch 19 -10 Km Distance Under The Area Gopalnagar 61 Figure 81 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Stretch 19 -10km Distance 62 Under The Area Gopalnagar Figure 82 : LULC Of Stretch 20 -10 Km Distance Under The Area Ratatalav 62 Figure 83 : FCC Of Stretch 20 -10 Km Distance Under The Area Ratatalav 63 Figure 84 : Distribution Of LULC Studies Of Stretch 20 -10km Distance 64 Under The Area Ratatalav Table 1 : General Land Use Pattern Of Gujarat 1 Table 2 : Geographic Coordinates Of Total 8 Sv Stations 1 Table 3 : Geographic Coordinates Of Total 20 Stretch Of 10km Each Of 2 The 196.14 Km Proposed Pipeline Project Table 4 : LULC Studies Of SV-01-Gala-Morbi Area 5 Table 5 : LULC Studies Of SV-02-Haripar Area 7 Table 6 : LULC Studies Of SV-03-Nava Katariya Area 10 Table 7 : LULC Studies Of SV-04-Vondh Area 12 Table 8 : LULC Studies Of SV-05-Bhimasar Area 15 Table 9 : LULC studies of SV-06-Jetparda Area 17 Table 10 : LULC studies of SV-07-Naavgaam Area 20 Table 11 : LULC studies of SV-08-Ratanpar Area 22 Table 12 : LULC studies stretch 01-10km distance under the area Ratanpar 25 Table 13 : LULC studies stretch 02-10km distance under the area Iswariya 27 Table 14 : LULC studies stretch 03-10km distance under the area Ranipat 29 Table 15 : LULC studies stretch 04-10km distance under the area Sagadhra 31 Table 16 : LULC studies stretch 05-10km distance under the area Khetardi 33 Table 17 : LULC studies stretch 06-10km distance under the area Wankiya 35 Table 18 : LULC studies stretch 07-10km distance under the area Vankda 37 Table 19 : LULC studies stretch 08-10km distance under the area Jivapar 39 Table 20 : LULC studies stretch 09-10km distance under the area Piludi 41 Table 21 : LULC studies stretch 10-10km distance under the area Khiri 43 Table 22 : LULC studies stretch 11-10km distance under the area Haripar 45 Table 23 : LULC studies stretch 12-10km distance under the area Shikarpur 47 Table 24 : LULC studies stretch 13-10km distance under the area Nava- 49 Katariya Table 25 : LULC studies stretch 14-10km distance under the area 51 Chhodwala Table 26 : LULC studies stretch 15-10km distance under the area Karmaria 53 Table 27 : LULC studies stretch 16-10km distance under the area Sikra 55 ANNEXURE NO. ANNEXURE NAME PAGE NO. Table 28 : LULC studies stretch 17-10km distance under the area Sukhpar 57 Table 29 : LULC studies stretch 18-10 km distance under the area 59 Bhimasar Table 30 : LULC studies stretch 19-10 km distance under the area 61 Gopalnagar Table 31 : LULC studies stretch 20-10km distance under the area Ratatalav 63 Annexure IX : Soil Environment 1 to 16 Figure 1 : Soil Sampling Location along the pipeline route 2 Figure 2 : Soil sampling locations around the Existing sectionalized valve 3 (Morbi SV-1, TOP – 2, At GALA) at CH:19/85 Km on Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 3 : Soil sampling locations around the Existing sectionalized valve 4 (Morbi SV-1, TOP – 1, At Navagham) at CH:24/18 Km on Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 4 : Soil sampling locations around the Existing sectionalized valve 5 (MRB SV-1, -2 + SL TOP – 2, At Jetparda) at CH:43/86 Km on Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 5 : Soil sampling locations around the Existing sectionalized valve 6 (Morbi SV- 4 + TOP - 3, At Vondh) at CH:88/19 Km on Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 6 : Soil sampling locations around the Existing sectionalized valve 7 (Morbi SV-5, + TOP – 4 & 4A, At Bhimasar) at CH:113/31 Km on Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 7 : Soil sampling locations around the Existing sectionalized valve 8 (SV-8 + TOP – 8 At ARPL Mainline) at CH:170/036.88 Km on Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 8 : Soil sampling locations around the Existing sectionalized valve 9 (SV-3 + TOP – 28 At Nava Katariya) at CH:36/90 Km on Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Table 1 : Details of Soil sampling Locations 1 Table 2 : Physical characteristics of Soil 10 Table 3 : Physical characteristics of soil 10 Table 4 : Chemical characteristics of soil in study area (Soil – water 11 Extract 1:5) Along pipeline route Table 5 : Chemical characteristics of soil in study area (Soil-Water Extract 12 1:5) along SV station Table 6 : Fertility Status 13 Table 7 : Relationship of CEC with Productivity 13 Table 8 : Relationship of CEC with Absorptivity 13 Table 9 : Fertility Status 14 Table 10 : Relationship of CEC with productivity 14 Table 11 : Relationship of CEC with absorptivity 14 Table 12 : Levels of heavy metals in soil-water extracts (mg/kg) 15 Table 13 : Levels of heavy metals in soil –water extracts (mg/kg) 15 Annexure X : Socio Economic Survey Details 1 to 18 Annexure XI : GLC for proposed Scenario (ISCST - 3) 1 to 12 Figure 1 : Incremental Rise Of Particulate Matter For SV Station 1: (SV- 8 + 1 Top- 8, At ARPL- Mainline) At Ch: 170 / 036.88km On Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 2 : Incremental Rise Of SO2 For SV Station 1: (SV- 8 + Top- 8, At 1 ARPL- Mainline) At Ch: 170 / 036.88km On Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 3 : Incremental Rise Of Nox For SV Station 1: (SV- 8 + Top- 8, At 2 Arpl- Mainline) At Ch: 170 / 036.88km On Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 4 : Incremental Rise Of Particulate Matter For SV Station 2: (SV- 5 + 2 Top- 4 & 4a, At Bhimasar) At Ch: 113 / 31km On Anjar – Chotila ANNEXURE NO. ANNEXURE NAME PAGE NO. Pipeline Figure 5 : Incremental Rise Of SO2 For SV Station 2: (SV- 5 + Top- 4 & 4a, 3 At Bhimasar) At Ch: 113 / 31km On Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 6 : Incremental Rise of NOx For SV Station 2: (Sv- 5 + Top- 4 & 4a, 3 At Bhimasar) At Ch: 113 / 31km On Anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 7 : Incremental rise of particulate matter for SV station 3: (SV-4 + 4 top- 3, at Vondh) at ch: 88/19km on anjar – chotila pipeline Figure 8 : Incremental rise of SO2 for SV station 3: (SV-4 + top- 3, at 4 vondh) at ch: 88/19km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 9 : Incremental rise of NOx for SV station 3: (SV-4 + top- 3, at 5 vondh) at ch: 88/19km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure10 : Incremental rise of particulate matter for SV station 4: (SV-3 + 5 top-28, at Nava Katariya) at Ch: 36/90km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 11 : Incremental rise of SO2 for sv station 4: (SV-3 + top-28, at Nava 6 Katariya) at ch: 36/90km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 12 : Incremental rise of NOx for SV station 4: (SV-3 + top-28, at Nava 6 Katariya) at ch: 36/90km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 13 : Incremental rise of particulate matter for SV station 5: (SV-2 + 7 top-2a, at Haripar) at ch: 37/39km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 14 : Incremental rise of SO2 for SV station 5: (SV-2 + top-2a, at 7 Haripar) at ch: 37/39km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 15 : Incremental rise of NOx for SV station 5: (SV-2 + top-2a, at 8 haripar) at ch: 37/39km on anjar – chotila pipeline Figure 16 : Incremental rise of particulate matter for SV station 6: (MRBSV-2 8 + sl top-2, at Jetparda) at ch: 43/86km on anjar – Chotila Pipeline Figure 17 : Incremental rise of SO2 for SV station 6: (mrbsv-2 + sl top-2, at 9 Jetparda) at ch: 43/86km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 18 : Incremental rise of NOx for SV station 6: (mrbsv-2 + sl top-2, at 9 Jetparda) at ch: 43/86km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 19 : Incremental rise of particulate matter for SV station 7: (Morbi SV- 10 1, top-2, at Gala) at ch:19/85km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline

Figure 20 : Incremental rise of SO2 for SV station 7: (morbi SV-1, top-2, at 10 Gala) at ch:19/85km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 21 : Incremental rise of NOx for SV station 7: (morbi SV-1, top-2, at 11 Gala) at ch:19/85km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 22 : Incremental rise of particulate matter for SV station 8: (MRB SV- 11 1+ sl top-1, at Navagham) at ch:24/18km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 23 : Incremental rise of particulate matter for SV station 8: (MRB SV- 12 1+ SL top-1, at Navagham) at ch:24/18km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Figure 24 : Incremental rise of NOx for SV station 8: (MRB SV-1+ SL top-1, 12 at Navagham) at ch:24/18km on Anjar – Chotila pipeline Annexure XII : Site specific Conservation Plan 1 to 10 Figure 1 : Showing proposed distribution of wild ASS sanctuary and pipe 2 line route (~11km) through wild ASS Sanctuary Table 1 : Medicinal plant in the study area 7 Table 2 : Recommended plant species for green belt development 8 Table 3 : Provision along with activities covered in conservation plan 10 Annexure XIII : Quality health, Safety and Environmental Policy of GSPL 1 Annexure XIV : Forest TImeline 1 to 3

Annexure XV : Forest View Form A 1 to 9

15.1 Forest View Form A Part 1 1 to 9 ANNEXURE NO. ANNEXURE NAME PAGE NO. Annexure XVI : Application Letter- Request for permission (WLS) 1 to 2

Annexure XVII : Application Letter- Request for permission( WLS-ESZ) 1 to 2

Annexure XVIII : Recommendation from Govt. of Gujarat, Forest & 1 to 2 Environment Department Annexue XIX : Detail Engineering Survey report Anjar Chotila Pipeline

(Draft Report) M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

FOR

Laying of Natural Gas transportation pipeline (196.14 Km) with associated facilities from Anjar (Dist. Kutch) to Chotila (Dist. Surendranagar), Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited (GSPL) For and on behalf of M/s. Anacon Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Particulars Signature Prepared & : Dr. D.S. Ramteke Checked by (EIA Coordinator) Approved by : Dr. D.G. Garway (Head of ACO & MD) Date : August 2016 The EIA report is prepared by M/s. Anacon Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur (a consultant organization accredited by QCI-NABET) as per the approved TOR issued by the Expert Appraisal Committee, Ministry of Environment & Forest (MoEF), New Delhi vide letter No. F. No. J-11011/144/2016- IA II(I) dated 2nd August 2016. The report incorporates the introduction of project activity, baseline data generation with respect to environmental components (air, noise, water, land, biological and socioeconomics), identification and prediction of impacts with mitigation measures, recommendation of environmental management plan with environmental monitoring to be implemented including risk assessment and disaster management plan and project benefits etc. as per chapter scheme and EIA notification.

ANqr /PD/20A/2015/48A Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation pipeline project with associated facilities from Anjar (Dist. Kutch) to Chotila (Dist. Surendranagar), Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION As a fuel, natural gas competes with a range of alternative products such as coal and lignite as well as petroleum products such as liquefied petroleum gas, naphtha, high speed diesel, light diesel oil and fuel oil. However, due to lower fuel operating costs and better combustion characteristics, natural gas has distinct economic advantages over other sources of energy. In addition, natural gas has substantial environmental advantages over other energy sources, due to lower emissions. The development of proposed project is for natural gas transportation within state of Gujarat. The proposed project is planned to be developed by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited (GSPL) India. M/s GSPL, a Group company of GSPC is one of the leading company in the field of Natural Gas transmission line. It is in the process of establishing & expanding its pipeline network all over the Gujarat State to take care of future demand-supply gap of natural gas to fulfill the requirements of various consumers throughout Gujarat. It is first company in India to transport natural gas on open access basis and is a Pure Natural Gas Transmission Company. GSPL is a pioneer in developing energy transportation infrastructure and connecting natural gas supply basins and LNG terminals to growing markets. The company has developed requisite expertise and confidence with proven project management competencies. GSPL proposes to lay a pipeline for the supply of Natural Gas from Anjar to Chotila. The proposed Anjar to Chotila Pipeline will originate from village Ratanpar-(GSPL's ARPL SV-8 TOP- 8), Taluka- Sayla & district Surendranagar of Gujarat State . Pipeline stretch will cover a distance of 196.14 km, and runs through Surendranagar, Morbi & Kutch regions and terminates at GSPL's Dispatch station at village Rata Talav, Taluk Anjar & district Kutch of Gujarat State. M/s. Gujarat State Petronet Limited (GSPL) has received the Authorization from PNGRB (Petroleum and natural Gas regulatory Board) for the transportation of natural gas with a permissible RoU width along the pipeline route.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed underground Natural Gas Pipeline project is of approx. 196.14 KM stretch from Anjar to Chotila with associated facilities such as Sectionalized valve Stations /Tap-off/Metering /Receiving/ Dispatch/Intermediate Pigging stations. The Proposed alignment also meets the other broader requirements of laying criteria of the pipelines. Accordingly, the present pipeline route has been selected for the transmission of natural gas to various parts of Gujarat.

Cost of Project The total estimated expenditure for laying of Anjar-Chotila pipeline project is approx. Rs 1058.40 Crores.

Need of Project The project is required to meet the growing demands of Natural Gas in Gujarat. GSPL proposes to lay dedicated Natural Gas transportation Pipeline from Anjar (Kutch) to Chotila (Surendranagar ) to supply Natural Gas in most efficient manner. Pipelines are internationally recognized as the preferred alternative for transport of fuels from the point of view of safety, economy and relative environmentally friendliness. The pipeline will help in decongestion of roads, eventually minimizing road accidents and environmental pollution that are generated by other means of transport.

Executive Summary 1

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation pipeline project with associated facilities from Anjar (Dist. Kutch) to Chotila (Dist. Surendranagar), Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

Salient Feature of Project

Length of Pipeline 196.14 km Diameter of Pipeline 36” No. of SV (Sectionalizing Valve) / IP (Intermediate 8 + 1 IP Pigging) Station No. Of Dispatch Terminal (DT) 1 No. Of Receiving Terminal (RT) 1

Executive Summary 2

Capacity of Proposed Pipeline (standalone) Approx. 23.13 MMSCMD Nearest Railway Station Railway Station Approx distance (City name) from pipeline (km) Anjar 5.0 Morbi 6.5 Than 5.0

Nearest Airport Airport (City Approx distance Name) from pipeline (km) Bhuj 38.0 Rajkot 55.0

Source of electricity State electricity board

Process Detail

Import of LNG at Regasification Take off point Mundra Terminal to Natural Gas of Mundra-

Anjar pipeline Proposed P/L Anjar

Dispatch Terminal

Receiving terminal at Chotila

Presently Proposed Project

Flow Diagram for transportation of Natural Gas

Executive Summary 3

DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT AIR ENVIRONMENT To establish the baseline status of study area, total 30 AAQ monitoring stations were selected, out of which 21 along main pipeline route & around the SV stations along the pipeline route. In this region, conventional air pollutants viz. PM10, Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen, as well as Hydrocarbons and Carbon Monoxide (CO), are identified for air quality assessment.

Along Pipeline route

3 The 24 hourly PM10 concentration varied in the range of 41-68 µg/m may be attributed to windblown soil, unpaved road etc. in rural areas in the study region. The concentrations of SO2 were observed to be varying in the range of 9-22 µg/m3. Similarly the concentration of NOx varied in the range 11-29 µg/m3 along the pipeline route. The observed Total VOCs and Total Hydrocarbons concentration at all the locations were found non- detectable. The observed carbon monoxide concentration at all the locations varied between 0.300- 0.489 mg/m3 which were found to be less than the NAAQS. The total hydrocarbon concentration at all locations was observed to be non-detectable along the pipeline route.

Around SV station

3 The concentration levels of PM10, SO2, NO2, CO were found to be in the range of 40-63 µg/m , 8-27 µg/m3, 10-28 µg/m3, 0.307-0.475 µg/m3 respectively whereas Total VOCs and total hydrocarbons were found to be non-detectable.

NOISE ENVIRONMENT Total thirty (30) locations were identified based on the activities in the village area, traffic areas and sensitive areas

Along Pipeline Route Equivalent noise levels, Leq (Day) and Leq (Night) were monitored across the pipeline route. The equivalent noise levels varied in the range of 57.8-64.8 and 35.8-40.3 dB(A) day and night time respectively. Vehicular traffic is the major noise sources and contributes mainly to background noise levels in the study area.

Along SV Stations: Equivalent noise levels, Leq (Day) and Leq (Night) were monitored around the SV stations and observed the range of 58.9-66.8 dB(A) and 35.2-40.1 dB(A) during day and night time respectively.

Noise level due to Traffic: The national highways are passing through this region and having major traffic activities. Agglomeration and congestion of traffic was observed on main roads and crossing of important roads, near petrol pumps, market and Industrial areas. During survey period, traffic density at these junctions was observed to be very high.

Executive Summary 4

WATER ENVIRONMENT The major drinking water source along the pipeline route is groundwater. Most of the villages are having public tube wells and hand pumps for domestic use. Physico-chemical parameters along with biological indicators of pollution have been used for ascertaining the status of water environment along the pipeline route, and SV stations. In order to determine the surface and groundwater quality, 2 sampling locations for surface water and 14 sampling locations for groundwater from various tube wells (TW), and bore wells (BW) covering a total 16 sampling locations in the study area.

Water Quality Assessment Surface Water Quality: Surface water samples were collected from Machhu river and sea water near Haripur village. The analysis results indicate that the pH ranged between 7.61 to 7.41 which are well within the specified standard of 6.5 to 8.5. The TDS was observed to be 1150-37794 mg/l .The Total hardness recorded was in the range of 310 to 1570 mg/l as CaCO3 .The nitrate was found to be in the range of 28.96 - 43.48 mg/l. The levels of chloride and sulphate were found to be in the range of 352.80-22688 mg/l and 82-223.91 mg/l respectively. Heavy metals content (i.e. As, Al, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Fe, Mn, Zn and Hg) were found to be very low and within specified standards. The overall surface water quality was found to be highly mineralized with respect to TDS, Hardness, Chlorides and Sulphates. The nutrient load in terms of nitirate and phosphate was found to be high whereas, organic load in terms of BOD and COD was found to be less indicating no organic load and devoid of pollution. The high concentration levels of minerals might be due to creek water ingress the source in high tide condition.

Groundwater quality The analysis results of ground water samples indicate that the pH ranged between 7.1 to 8.35 which are well within the specified standard of 6.5 to 8.5. The TDS was observed to be 203-1588 mg/l which is within the permissible limit of 2000 mg/l. The Total hardness recorded was in the range of 128 to

582 mg/l as CaCO3 which is also within the permissible limit of 600 mg/l. The nitrate was found to be in the range of 1.2-39.48 mg/l. The levels of chloride and sulphate were found to be in the range of 34.24-562.59 mg/l and 12.55-58.52 mg/l respectively. The levels of heavy metals content (i.e. As, Al, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Fe, Mn, Zn and Hg) were found to be within permissible limits. Overall groundwater quality was found to be highly mineralized with respect to hardness, total dissolved solids, chloride and sulphate. Nitrate concentration in some of the groundwater was found to be high due to surface runoff carrying fertilizers used for agriculture purposes. Heavy metals were found to be within permissible limits except Iron. LAND ENVIRONMENT Land use of the study area The land use & land cover map of 196.14 km stretch including SV stations and 20 Nos. each of 10 km stretch is prepared for the land use study. The data for the proposed pipeline project was collected using Resource SAT-2 (IRS-P6), Sensor – LISS- 4 having 5.6m special resolution and data of pass 2nd Jan, 26th Jan and 31st Jan 2016. Land use and land cover of the study area as well as the morphology was carried out by standard method of analysis of remotely sensed data and followed by

Executive Summary 5

ground truth and interpretation of satellite data. The outcome of the landuse study is presented in EIA report.

Soil: Soil was collected at different stretches along the pipeline route and around SV stations. Soil samples were collected from 15 different locations along pipeline route and SV stations.

Physico-Chemical Characteristics The texture of the soil was found to be silty clay, sandy clay and loamy sand in nature. Regular cultivation practices increase the bulk density of soils thus inducing compaction. This results in reduction in water percolation rate and penetration of root through soils. The bulk density of soils was found to be 1.08-1.13 g/cc which indicates favorable physical condition for plant growth . The water holding capacity of soil was in the range of 38.67-46.17%.

Chemical Characteristics pH of soil in the study area was found to be slightly acidic to alkaline in reaction as pH was in the range of 6.81-7.84. The soluble salts were determined from soil extract (1:1), the soluble salts are expressed interns of electrical conductivity (EC), the EC of the soil sample was in the range of 148.7-269.8 µS/cm. The important cations present in soil are calcium and magnesium. It was observed that both calcium and magnesium concentrations were in the range of 197.81-296.66 mg/kg and 80.25-180.54 mg/kg respectively. Whereas chloride in the range of 160.51-240.48 mg/kg. Amongst the exchangeable cations, Ca+2 and Mg+2 were found in the range of 96.44-146.47 mg/kg and 37.11 to 86.92 mg/kg respectively along the pipeline route while sodium and potassium in the range of 58.27-110.8 mg/lg and 74.88 – 120.7 mg/kg respectively.

Nutrient Status: Organic matter and organic carbon present in the soil influence its physical and chemical properties and is responsible for stability of soil aggregates. Organic matter and nitrogen were found in the range of 2.28-2.88 % and 116.25-182.6 kg/ha. This showed that soil was moderately fertile in organic and nutrient content.

BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Study of biological aspects was made as per topography, land use, vegetation pattern, etc. The biological survey was carried out by considering ecological sensitive receptors like forested area (Protected forest and Social forest) in order to study existing status of floral composition and faunal attributes, similarly biological survey was also carried out on non-forested area (agriculture field, water reservoir, riverside, on hills, in plain area, village wasteland, block plantation etc. The biological survey is mainly concerned at selected locations along the pipeline route of 500 m towards left and right hand sides of proposed pipeline route and traversing area and 5 km periphery at stations. Considering magnitude of impact and to know the existing status of biological environment at immediate vicinity at station, 5 Km periphery along station was considered.

Executive Summary 6

Vegetation Composition Gujarat Region Kutch (Kutch) falls under the Biogeographic Zone No. 3. Vegetation mainly comprises of spare and stunted growth of species like Acacia and thorn bushes. Acacia leucophloea (Harmo Baval), Acacia nilotica (Baval), Azardirachta indica (Neem), Salvadora persica (Pilu, Khari Jar), Salvadora oleoides (Mithi Jar), Ailanthus aculea (Allu), Prosopis spicigera (Khijado) and the Prosopis juliflora (Gando Baval) were observed to be predominantly occurring trees in this area and along the pipeline route. Prosopis juliflora (Gando Baval) was observed to be the most dominant species amongst the shrub vegetation. The occurrence of large trees mostly restricted near the villages.

Major Important Pipeline Crossings Forest Crossings: Proposed pipeline is running through unavoidable forest land in Gujarat State having length as given below; separate forest clearance or permission will be obtained as per Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 and subsequent amendment thereof:

Sr. No. Name of the Forest ROU in mtr Area in hectare Length Width 1 Reserve Forest, 23250 10 2.3250 Surrendranagar 2 Protected forest, 60 10 0.0600 Surrendranagar 3 Protected Forest, Morbi 80 10 0.0800 4 Reserve Forest, Kutch 640 10 0.6400 5 Protected Forest, Kutch 60 10 0.0600 Total 3.1650

Length of pipeline that passes through CRZ area is approx. 12.25 km out of total pipeline length of 196km. CRZ Clearance Recommendation from GCZMA to MoEF&CC has also been given on via letter dated 04th September 2017. HDD method will be adopted for approx. 1.2 kms that includes Hadakiya Creek so that there will be no disturbance to water course way, creek bed, bank & any vegetation nearby. Survey along the pipeline route within the wild-Ass Sanctuary Area Flora: The natural terrestrial vegetation of the sanctuary and surrounding area area falls under “VI – B Northern Tropical Forest” Sub type C-I Desert Thorn Forest (Kutch, Saurashtra, Gujarat). The forest patches falling under this category have mono-dominant Prosopis juliflora and other Acacia spp., Euphorbia spp., Zyziphus mauritiana was also observed in these scrubs. The ground cover generally is of Cassia auriculiformis, Zyziphus nummularis etc. Permanent vegetation composed of xerophytic and consists of trees and shrubs up to 6m tall or rarely more. It is characterized by arid vegetation dominated by Acacia spp., Capparis spp., Prosopis ceneraria, Prosopis chilensis, Calotropis procera, Cassia auriculata, Cordia gharaf, and partly

Executive Summary 7

Azadirechta indica. However, large open areas are extensively covered by the naturalized species Prosopis juliflora which forms almost impenetrably thickets at the cost of natural vegetation. Considering the species composition, the vegetation notably grouped under Type 6B/C1 – Desert as per Champion and Seth (1968). These type of vegetation is closest to the degraded phase. Hard wooded species like Acacia leucophloea spp. Predominate and peculiar characteristic of the forest. The dominants vary from 4.5-10m in height and tend to be collected in clumps leaving bare ground in between. Regeneration by root suckers is common, notably in Prosopis and Capparis. Climbers are relatively numerous and also usually exhibit xerophytic adaptations. The woody growth is of all sizes of Prosopis and Capparis from the trees down to the dwarf shrubs with no differentiation in to storeys. The perennial grasses grow in clumps and tussocks. There is a thin growth of annual grasses after the rains. Stunted Acacia leucophloea, Acacia tortilis, A. nilotica, Prosopis cineraria are seen intermixed with Azadirachta indica, Ziziphus spp. It is mostly invaded by Prosopis juliflora. It is a biotically controlled community existing in a severely degraded state. Degraded scrub is the dominant vegetation type throughout the study area. Zizyphus nummularia together with Calotropis procera are dominant shrubs. Salvadora persica occur scattered in the scrub growth. Tribulus terrestris, Cenchrus ciliaris, Aristida spp., Achyranthes aspera are dominant.

Fauna: During survey indirect evidences in the form of dried pellets of wild ass were observed in notified sanctuary area while direct sightings of wild ass seen near along Anjar – Dharngadhara Highway near village Rapar which are almost 2.8 km away from the pipeline route. Nilgai and Jackal are very common inhabitant in the area. The area supports variety of local as well as many migrants avifauna species.

Salt pans The proposed natural gas pipeline partly crosses the saltpans. Saltpans are nothing but typical tide water impounded enclosed system adjacent to creek environment. They are characteristically exposed to a wide range of environmental stress and perturbation which manifest mainly through salinity changes. However, saltpans are immature ecosystem as compared with a typical marine system and harbour a high proportion of opportunistic species. Species diversity is directly linked with salinity. Hence the higher the salinity, the lower the species diversity and simpler the structure of the ecosystem. The abandoned salt pans occupy significantly large area with poor diversity. A few halophytes such as Suaeda fruticose and Suaeda maritima were found abundant. The other herbaceous species which grow along the bunds include Aleurops lagopoides, Aerva javanica, etc. These saltpans serve as feeding grounds for a variety of resident as well as migrant birds.

Medicinal Plants: Wild plants of medicinal value are distributed in the area. Some of the plant species having medicinal value like Abutilon indicum, Aerua javanica, Aerva lanata, Amaranthus virides, Ocimum sp., Tribulus terrestris, Suaeda nudiflora, Sida acuta, etc. were quite common in study area.

Faunal Diversity Wildlife present on the proposed pipeline project site was identified through a combination of direct observation and indirect indicators including vocalizations and signs (eg. scat, tracks). Wildlife survey

Executive Summary 8

was conducted concurrently with the plant community assessment. The following faunal diversity observed in the area:

Mammals: Total 11 species of mammals observed in the study area out of which Indian Wild Ass/ Gudkhar (Equus hemionus khur) protected under schedule – I, Mongoose (Herpestes edwardsi), Jungle cat (Felis chaus), Indian Fox (Vulpes bengalensis) and Common langur (Presbytis entellus) are schedule –II animals. Wild boar (Sus sucrofa) and Boselaphus tragocamelus (Blue bull) is protected as Schedule-III animal and Hares & Five striped squirrel are included in schedule IV of Wild Life Protection act 1972. Fruit bat & Rats protected in Schedule V of Wild Life Protection act 1972.

Reptiles: Among the reptiles 16 species reported out of which Lissemys punctata (Indian Flap-shell Turtle) is provided in Schedule – I (Part II) Indian Cobra (Naja naja), Common rat snakes (Ptyas mucosus), are provided protection as per Schedule-II of Wild life protection act, (1972).

Avifauna: Among birds 47 waterfowl species and 37 terrestrial birds species reported in the study area out of which Limosa limosa (Black-tailed Godwit), Pelecanus philippensis (Spot-billed pelican), Anhinga Melanogaster (Darter), Mycteria leucocephala (Painted Stork) observed in study area are Near Threatened (NT) Category as per IUCN.

Agriculture Agriculture and Horticulture crops along pipeline route During survey, various types of agriculture and horticulture crops were observed along the pipeline route. Areas near the coastal zone having a good water potential and good soil cover are used for raising horticultural crops like date palm, coconut, pomegranate, mango, chiku (sapota), guava etc. The other horticulture crops includes, Psidium guava (Jamfal), Carica Papaya (Papaya), Moringa oleifera (Drumstick), Citrus aurantifolia (Nimbudo) etc. Agriculture crops dominated with Ricinus communis (Castor), Triticum aestivum (Gehu), Herbaceum gossypium (Cotton), Cicer arietinum (Chickpea), Seasame (Tal), etc.

SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT Baseline Status Baseline information was collected in order to delineate the existing socio-economic profile of the study area. The database thus generated in this study includes:  Demographic structure  Infrastructure base in the area  Economic structure  Health status  Cultural attributes  Public awareness and their concern about the project  Socio economic status in relation to quality of life The study area covers the pipeline route and SV stations. Infrastructure resource base of the above study area is reflected with respect to education, water facility, communication and transportation

Executive Summary 9

power supply and medical facility etc. Economic attributes and the infrastructure resource details have been abstracted from housing, house hold amenities and assets. Cultural and aesthetic attributes falling under the study area as tourist attraction in the study area are detailed in the report.

Awareness and Opinion of People about the Pipeline Project Pipeline will cross Agriculture Farm, National highway, State highway as well as barren land and forest area. Most of the people in study area were unaware about pipeline project, however those who were directly involved because of their farm or barren land coming under pipeline project were aware about project. People opinion was positive about project because they felt that pipeline project will generate employment and expected from the project authorities.

Quality of Life The average QoL index value for the study area is leading to satisfactory level due to satisfactory economic status like, good educational facilities, communication facilities, fair transportation facilities and also availability of basic needs viz., food, clothing & housing. Moreover, since proposed project is for laying a natural gas pipeline and creating the supply and demand network which will help to bring more industrial activities and economic growth of the region, the quality of life of the people in the region will automatically increase in a positive way.

ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES

AIR ENVIRONMENT Construction Phase Construction of the Anjar – Chotila Pipeline involves civil, electrical and mechanical work involving different types of machinery and is labor intensive. Environmental impacts related to construction works are mostly temporary in nature and last only during the period of construction. The study area is relatively clean and does not have any major source of air pollution as shown by the baseline status on air quality.

Impact Various construction activities contribute to marginal air pollution in the area such as:  Dust generation from transportation of construction material by Road, grading, activities, civil works and movement of vehicle.  PM, CO, NOx & SOx generation due to operation of DG set. Mitigation Measure  Ensuring preventive maintenance of vehicles and equipment.  Water sprinkling.  Ensuring vehicles with valid Pollution under Control certificates are used.  Ensuring stacks height of DG set as per SPCB norm for adequate dispersion.

Operation Phase

Executive Summary 10

A DG set will be kept as standby mode and will be operated as secondary means only when the primary supply from GEB is not available, at SV/IP/DT/RT station.

Impact  PM, CO, NOx & SOx generation due to operation of DG set Mitigation Measure  Developing green belt at associated facilities such as Sectionalized valve Stations /Tap-off/ Metering /Receiving/ Dispatch/Intermediate Pigging stations Ensuring stacks height of DG set as per SPCB norms for adequate dispersion.

NOISE ENVIRONMENT Construction Phase Impact  Noise generation due to vehicle movement & operation of heavy equipment & machinery  Noise generation due to operation of DG set & civil work.

Mitigation Measure  Ensuring preventive maintenance of vehicles & equipment.  Providing DG set with acoustic enclosure & exhaust mufflers.  Minimizing the night work.

Operation Phase Impact  Noise generation due to operation of DG set.

Mitigation Measure  Providing DG set with acoustic enclosure / exhausts mufflers.

WATER ENVIRONMENT Construction Phase Minimum water will be used during construction phase of pipeline. Water requirement during construction period (at peak) is approximately estimated as 50-60 KLD.

Impact  Water generated from hydro test.  Domestic waste water.

Mitigation Measure

Executive Summary 11

 Maximization of the reuse of hydrotest water to the other section of pipeline.  Major crossing job will be carried out during dry season  Ensuring supply of portable toilet for construction staff.  Preparation of sock pit & septic tank.

Operation Phase There will be no requirement of water for the pipeline operation along the route. However, marginal water will be required for domestic use at the SV stations during operational phase. The total water requirement during operational phase is estimated approx. 20 KLD. Impact  Domestic waste water.

Mitigation Measure  Preparation of sock pit & septic tank for disposal of sewage.  Installation of rainwater harvesting structures at Stations.

LAND ENVIRONMENT Construction Phase Impact  A very marginal quantity of earth excavated for terminals and pipeline lying will become surplus after installation of the pipeline and may be required for disposal. However, the aesthetics of the pipeline RoU and soil quality will not be affected.  The pipeline route Anjar-Chotila passes through agriculture land at most of the places. Some part of the pipeline route passes through the sandy soils with minimal vegetation.  Major land use along the proposed pipeline route is agriculture / barren land thus there will be very less impact on land-use pattern along the pipeline route. No change in land use pattern along the pipeline route is envisaged as the land will be restored to its near original condition and hand over to land owner after laying the pipeline.  Land will be permanently acquired for all stations (surface facilities).

Mitigation Measure  In the adjoining areas soil type is silty, sandy, Loamy, clay followed by sandy loam with medium percolation. However, every precaution will be taken to avoid spillage on soils during construction phase to protect groundwater quality and soil microbiology in pipeline route and SV stations  Construction activities may be carried out within the ROU of pipeline.  Excavated top soil will be segregated and restored back to near to original state after completion of pipeline laying.

Executive Summary 12

 A record with respect to quantity, quality and treatment / management of solid/ hazardous waste shall be maintained.  Disposing hazardous wastes to authorized vendors as per legal provisions.  Any kind of materials resulting from clearing and grading will not be deposited on temporary or permanent basis in the approach roads, streams, ditches and any other position which may hinder the passage and / or natural water drainage.  On completion of construction works, all temporary structures, surplus materials and wastes will be completely removed from the site to avoid future land use incompatibility. During of construction, waste on agricultural land will be prohibited.  The pipeline corridor for laying the buried pipeline will be about 20m wide and the total estimated corridor length is about 196.14 km. This will be obtained on a right of use (RoU) basis. The land will be restored to near original condition after the pipeline is laid, hence impact on land use pattern due to laying of pipeline will be marginal and reversible  Standard construction procedures will be implemented to ensure that the impact on surface drainage pattern and soil erosion is kept minimal. This will necessarily include avoiding blockage of natural surface drainage and developing appropriate drainage system in areas where it is unavoidable.  The current topography and land usages of the project area will not be adversely affected due to limited constructional activities for the project.

Operation Phase The land on permanent basis is required at SV stations only. The land requirement at each associated facilities such as Sectionalized valve Stations /Tap-off/Metering /Receiving/ Dispatch/Intermediate Pigging stations is approximately 0.36 Ha. Thus the total area requirement for 11 associated facilities (SV/IP/RT/DT) is 3.96 Ha approximately..

Impact  There is a potential for impact on soil quality due to spills during pigging of pipelines, handling storage or hazardous waste (used oil) & chemical, if any.

Mitigation Measures  Proper collection, transportation and temporary storage of pigging wastes.  Adequate reuse of used oil.

BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Construction Phase: Impact of on-land Flora & Fauna  Construction will involve a range of disturbing activities including excavation, civil works, drilling, pipe-laying, welding and testing. Nuisance - related impacts will include dust, noise and vibration.

Executive Summary 13

 These impacts may be local on species for a short period but none of these effects are likely to result in more than a temporarily, making nuisance to sensitive species (wild ass and nesting bird species) close to the proposed pipeline route.  Clearance of vegetation for ROU and site preparation.  Road kills of animal due to vehicle movement.  Trapping of animals in pipeline trench / un-barricaded pits  Cutting of trees for firewood by construction workers The other possible impacts during the construction phase like bush fires, road and open trench, hunting and prosecution, etc. was also studied and mitigation measures provided accordingly.

Mitigation Measures:  Closing of trenches as soon as possible after pipeline laying works.  Hard barricading of trench when the pit is opened for long duration..  Avoid tree cutting, wherever possible.  Prohibiting use of firewood in project camps and making use of cooking gas mandatory.  Prevent littering of work sites with wastes, especially plastic and hazardous waste.  Awareness among the drivers in order to regulate speeding and avoid road-kills.  Company has a policy for road safety which sets speed limits for vehicles operating for the company.  Conservation plan recommended for Schedule – I Flora and Fauna.  Compensatory Afforestation needs to carry out in association with forest department as per Forest guidelines & Act.

Impact on aquatic flora and fauna  The primary concern is the crossings of pipeline through the two waterways: Hadkiya Creek and Salt Pan thus, biological resources could be affected in Hadkiya Creek.  Crossing of Hadkiya Creek or maintenance activities in it could create sedimentation or erosion  A pipeline accident (spill or leak) resulting in products flowing into the creek could result in death or injury to species living or feeding in downstream areas.

Mitigation Measures: Construction within Hadkiya Creek shall be guided by the following restrictions:  NO CONSTRUCTION in Hadkiya Creek may occur during rainy season.  The construction schedule shall call for construction on Hadkiya Creek to be completed as quickly as possible  Excavation within the creek bed shall be limited to the pipeline right-of-way, except as otherwise approved by appropriate permitting agencies

Executive Summary 14

 No labour camp in this CRZ area.  Use of equipment and mainline construction activities within rivers shall be limited to minimum.  The mud and drilling fluids generated during the drilling operations shall be disposed-off in an approved manner.

Operation Phase Impact Evaluation  The movement of operation related vehicles may result in road kills of animals.  Cutting of vegetation on ROU during pipeline maintenance.

Mitigation Measures  Avoiding tree cutting wherever possible.  Regulating speeding of project-related vehicles.

Public awareness programme The local people will be educated to understand the importance of wildlife conservation and plantation program and be encouraged to take active part in agro forestry and social forestry program with the leading role played by the GSPL and Forest Department.

SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT Positive Impacts  Amongst the most common positive effects that household will be general growth in commercial and industrial activity in the area.  Proposed project is expected to contribute improvement of quality of life in the region  The civil amenities like medical facilities, market, education, sports and cultural activities will likely to improve in the study area.  Increase in infrastructure resources due to the project by way of transport and communication and other basic requirements will be generated for the working population of the project.  There will be some visible positive benefits along the pipeline route. Wherever feasible, local labor will be used as much as possible during construction for land clearing, land stabilization, restoration of top soil, and restoration of local roads. This would create employment generation of locals & also help in improving of the existing socio-economic status.

Negative Impacts  Discontent among landowners due to delayed payment of compensation .  Change in the local socio economic environment due to the increased activities

Executive Summary 15

 Degradation of the environment, and damage to local roads and other infrastructure during construction

Mitigation Measures  Ensuring timely payment of Land/Crop compensation to the landowners as per GW&GP Act 2000.  Vocational training programmes will be organized for the local people. That may developed there capacity as skill and will be helpful for them in getting more employment opportunities.  An emergency preparedness plan will be prepared in advance, to deal with firefighting, evacuation and local communication.  A road safety awareness campaign will be carried out to better inform the communities about road safety. Journey management will be followed.  Consolidating deliveries of materials and personnel to project sites, whenever feasible, to minimize flow of traffic

ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES Technology Alternatives Pipeline laying and transportation of natural gas in an established practice worldwide. Latest Technology and construction machinery will be used for pipeline construction so that minimum damage will done to the surroundings. Gas pipeline network will be monitored continuously using SCADA system.

Alternatives for Project site The proposed evacuation pipeline route would not pass through any environmentally sensitive aeras, (except wild ass sanctuary, Hadkiya creek and salt pan crossing), human habitations, archeological monuments. The major land use along the proposed pipeline is agricultural, national and state highways. There are no established breeding grounds and migratory routes along the pipeline route. During Reconnaissance, Route Verification and Validation, a number of development, obstacles, forest land, villages (dwellings), were noticed which needed to be avoided. Therefore new pipeline route was aligned keeping in view the about mentioned aspects.

Environment Monitoring Programme The proposed Anjar-Chotila pipeline runs underground at minimum depth of 1-1.2 m and is controlled by SCADA system which allow continuous monitoring and rapid closure of valves, therefore there are very rare chances of leakage and therefore regular monitoring of eleven SV stations will be done to assess the surrounding environmental quality.

PROJECT BENEFIT  The pipeline, during construction and operation phase will generate direct and in-direct employment as there will be requirement of unskilled and skilled workers in site activities,

Executive Summary 16

supply of raw material, auxiliary and ancillary works, which would improve the economic status of the people in area.  Proposed Natural gas pipeline developmental project will result in considerable growth of service sector and will also generate new industrial and business opportunities in the areas through which it will pass Small and medium scale industries may also be developed as a consequence.  The proposed Natural gas pipeline will also lead to investment by major industries in Gujarat. Investment by big industrial players will generate employment for the local population.  Due to easy availability of Natural gas, emissions from the same industrial setups will also be reduced to a large extent.  Transportation by pipeline is comparatively less expensive than the other modes of transport, both in the capital and operating costs. If a good network of pipelines is implemented throughout the country, this will ensure that the pipeline-transported products will be available to the consumers at a lower cost than alternate modes of transport  Pipeline will be able to feed natural gas to multiple industrial units and thereby helping them in switching over to cleaner fossil fuel.  Connectivity to city gas network to pipeline from delivery point will reduce the requirement of LPG cylinders used in households.  Pipelines are internationally recognized as the preferred alternative for transport of hydrocarbons from the point of view of safety, economy, reliability, and relative environmentally friendliness.

ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS As a consequence of rapid industrialization in India, fuel needs are increasing at a rapid rate and supply demand gap is widening. Pipelines are internationally recognized as preferred alternative for transport of fuels from the point of view of safety, economy and relative environmentally friendliness. The cost of this project is estimated to be 1058.40 crore including contingency cost to take care of any inflation and exigencies. These cost estimates are primarily based on cost of piping material, equipment and facilities, RoU and pipeine laying cost incurred by GSPL for its recently implemented pipelines and market enquiries on latest prices. Besides the tangible benefits, the project has got number of intangible benefits like minimum emissions of the green house gases, no adverse impact on environment, socio-economic benefits to the local people and the region and enhancement of the fuel/energy for the country. The establishment of Anjar-Chotila Pipeline, when operated will provide significant supply of fuel to the consumers.

Health, Safety and Environmental Management System  The objective is to identify any significant HSE risks, particular to this project which cannot be adequately managed by the normal risk management processes and construction HSE procedures. Following the one-off overall construction HSE risk assessment, a systematic assessment of all health, safety and environmental risk shall be carried out during the planning of all construction activities which will include the following:

Executive Summary 17

 Listing all types of work during the activity  Listing the health, safety and environmental hazards of each type of work  Indicating how each risk will be controlled, e.g. by referring to the relevant project procedure, by additional training, by close supervision  Indicating the need for specific job safety analysis, where the normal procedures and controls are expected to be inadequate

Provisions for HSE management plan Adequate provisions will be made and spent by the project for:  Recruitment of the required number of qualified HSE staff  Development of general induction (including HSE awareness) training program and job focused HSE training for all workforce  Development of HSE awareness / information programs for the nearby communities in collaboration with the local administration  Procedures, human resources and equipment to monitor environmental performance of the operations and the associated environmental quality  Additional environmental studies to assess in detail the potential effects on physico-chemical and biological characteristics of the near shore environment All these provisions are seen as an inherent part of the project and not as additional requirements. Given the early stage of the project development, it is at present not possible to quantify of costs of the associated measures, however necessary expenditure will be included as per the requirement of statutory authorities.

RISK ASSESSMENT Safety systems viz. Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (SCADA) & Distributed Control System (DCS), Cathodic Protection (CP) shall be installed to the proposed facilities. Risk assessment study carried out for the proposed project has evaluated that the risks due to flash fire, jet fire, overpressure and late pool fire is within acceptable limits and suitable mitigation measures have been identified.

EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN In spite of various preventive and precautionary measures taken in works, the possibility of a mishap cannot be totally ruled out. The company shall develop an Emergency Response & Disaster Management plan (ERDMP) which addresses potential major incidents at the site, including fire, collapse of structures, serious injuries, exposure to hydrocarbon gases and natural calamities. It shall also deal with possible environment incidents on land and possible social impacts. Emergency Response and Disaster Management Plan shall be prepared to provide a quick guidance to the personnel with respect to action(s) to be taken when an emergency situation has occurred or is likely to occur in order to primarily mitigate injuries or damage to personnel, property and environment. The plan shall therefore be developed in consultation with relevant local authorities and emergency services.

Executive Summary 18

CSR ACTIVITIES CSR activities will be taken up as per the guidelines issued by the Governmental authorities from time to time.

CONCLUSION The detailed study carried out involving analysis of baseline environmental quality data and prediction of impacts for different environmental components does not envisage any significant adverse impact of the proposed activity. Any changes occurring during the construction and operational phase of the project will be taken care through implementation of suggested environmental management plans. Further, various environmental parameters shall be monitored regularly to ensure maintenance of quality of environment and timely appropriate action shall be taken, in case of any significant adverse impacts.

Executive Summary 19

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1. PROJECT PROPONENT As a fuel, natural gas competes with a range of alternative products such as coal and lignite as well as petroleum products such as liquefied petroleum gas, naphtha, high speed diesel, light diesel oil and fuel oil. However, due to lower fuel operating costs and better combustion characteristics, natural gas has distinct economic advantages over other sources of energy. In addition, natural gas has substantial environmental advantages over other energy sources, due to lower emissions. The development of proposed project is for natural gas transportation within state of Gujarat. The proposed project is planned to be developed by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited (GSPL). M/s GSPL, a Government of Gujarat undertaking is one of the leading company in the field of Natural Gas transmission line. It is in the process of expanding its pipeline network all over the Gujarat State to take care of future demand-supply gap to fulfill the requirements of various consumers throughout Gujarat. It is first company in India to transport natural gas on open access basis and is a Pure Natural Gas Transmission Company. GSPL is a pioneer in developing energy transportation infrastructure and connecting natural gas supply basins and LNG terminals to growing markets. It is continuously expanding its pipeline network in Gujarat to reach the demand centers by laying gas pipeline network. The company has developed requisite expertise and confidence with proven project management competencies. GSPL is the second largest Natural Gas transportation company in India and presently operating pipeline network in the state of Gujarat.

1.2. PROJECT BRIEF In order to facilitate the augmentation of gas supply to various consumers in Gujarat, an analysis of the infrastructure requirements has been carried out and based on such analysis, it was decided to create suitable infrastructure facilities like LNG import terminal and creation of network of high- pressure gas transmission pipelines to facilitate transportation of gas from point of supply to points of demand related to the consumers/industries (domestic, petrochemicals, power plants and other allied industries) which will help to increase the economic output of the region and thereby the nation. Moreover, being a green gas, it is environment friendly and the cost of transportation will be drastically reduced as compared to other means of transportation and supply to the consumers will be in cheaper rate. The project is required as existing pipeline from Varsamedi (Anjar to Chotila) will not meet the total transportation volume requirement from the GSPC LNG Terminal. GSPL would be the only company to have pipelines in this section for transportation of natural gas for which M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited (GSPL) has received the Authorization from PNGRB (Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board) for the development of following project for the transportation of Natural Gas with a permissible RoU width along the pipeline route (Annexure I). GSPL proposes to lay a network of Gas Pipeline for the supply of Natural Gas to various consumers situated at Gujarat state. There are numbers of supporting industries that have been developed in Anjar, Gandhidham, Kandla & Bhuj region of Kutch district. In order to fulfill the requirement of natural gas in future, GSPL proposes to lay a pipeline for the supply of Natural Gas from Anjar to Chotila. The proposed Anjar to Chotila Pipeline will originate from village Ratanpar-(GSPL's ARPL SV-8 TOP- 8), Taluka-Sayla of district-Surendranagar, pipeline stretch will cover a distance of 196.14 km,

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-1

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

thatruns through Surendranagar, Morbi & Kutch regions and terminates at GSPL's Dispatch station at village Rata Talav, Taluk Anjar & district-Kutch of Gujarat.. The Index map is shown in Figure 1.1 and pipeline route is shown in Figures 1.2. The panoramiv features of Anjar-Chotila pipeline route is also shown in Figure 1.3, as well as the key locations through which the pipeline is passing and the SV stations along the route are presented in Plates 1.1. The proposed facilities along the pipeline route of Anjar to Chotila underground Natural Gas Pipeline Network with associated facilities such as SV/Tap-off/Metering /Receiving/ Dispatch / Intermediate Pigging/Sectionalized valve Stations. The Proposed alignment also meets the other broader requirements of laying criteria of the pipelines. Accordingly, the present pipeline route has been selected for the transmission of natural gas to various parts of Gujarat. The proposed pipeline alignment runs through several talukas of Gujarat state as given below:

SL. Chainage (Km) Length Taluk District State No From To (Km) 1 0/00 14/566.99 14/566.99 Sayla Surendranagar Gujarat 2 14/566.99 26/320.83 11/753.84 Thangadh Surendranagar 3 26/320.83 41/703.04 15/382.21 Muli Surendranagar 4 41/703.04 58/961.40 17/258.36 Halavad Morbi 5 58/961.40 85/952.68 26/991.28 Morbi Morbi 6 85/952.68 100/939.55 14/986.87 Maliya Morbi 7 100/939.55 111/897.95 10/958.40 Salt Pan Area, Kutch 8 111/897.95 173/244.09 61/346.14 Bhachau Kutch 9 173/244.09 196/140.02 22/895.93 Anjar Kutch Total 196/140.02

Certain length of pipeline has been proposed within existing GSPL – Pipeline network and certain section of pipeline is proposed cross country having fresh independent RoU. The details of alignment of proposed Anjar - Chotila pipeline from take-off to terminal point is furnished below:

Sl. Chainage (km) Length (Km) Details of Alignment No. From To 1 0/00 17/500 17/500 Parallel to GSPL Ratanpar-Morbi Pipeline 2 17/500 93/282 75/782 Pipeline runs through cross country 3 93/282 98/304 05/022 Parallel to GSPL Morbi-Mundra Pipeline 4 98/304 119/149 20/845 Pipeline runs through cross country 5 119/149 144/239 25/090 Parallel to GSPL Morbi-Mundra Pipeline 6 144/239 193/241 49/002 Pipeline runs through cross country 7 193/241 196/140.02 02/899.02 Parallel to GSPL Morbi-Mundra Pipeline Total 196/140.02

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-2

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

FIGURE 1.1: INDEX MAP OF THE PROJECT SITE

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-3

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

[Toposheet No.-41 N-7, 41 N-6, 41 N-2, 41 N-1, 41 J-13, 41 I-16, 41 I-12, 41 I-11, 41 I-7, 41 I-3, 41 I- 4] FIGURE 1.2: ANJAR TO CHOTILA PIPELINE STUDY AREA STRETCH

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-4

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

FIGURE 1.5: PANORAMIC FEATURES OF PIPELINE ROUTE

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-5

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

SITE PHOTOGRAPH

TAKE-OFF POINT CROSSING SH-22 CROSSING AT VILLAGE RATANPAR, TALUKA SAYLA & DISTRICT SURENDRANAGAR OF GUJARAT

BHOGAVA RIVER @ CH. 04/786.54KM NATIONAL HIGHWAY – 47 (NH8A) [AHMEDABAD TO CHOTILA]

PIPELINE CROSSING SALT PAN ON CHOTILA-BHUJ HIGHWAY

PLATE 1.1: SITE FEATURES ALONG THE PIPELINE ROUTE

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-5

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

1.3. DETAILS ABOUT EIA CONSULTANT ORGANISATION With a view to assess the environmental impacts arising due to the proposed Anjar-Chotila pipeline and associated facilities, Gujarat State Petronet Ltd. (GSPL) retained M/s Anacon Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur, to carry out the EIA and RA study for the said pipeline for getting necessary environmental clearance from MoEF & CC New Delhi. Anacon established in 1993 as an analytical testing laboratory and now a leading environmental consultancy firm backed by testing lab for environment and food in central India region. Anacon Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur, accredited by Quality Council of India (QCI) for conducting environmental studies vide no. 44th NABET accreditation committee meeting for re-accreditation held on March 04, 2015 as category A consultant organization in Sector 27. The consulting organization is presently accredited in 14 Sectors. This report contains description of EIA study for baseline conditions of various environmental components Viz. air, noise, water, land, biology and socio economic surrounded the proposed project activity (along the pipeline route and SV stations). The report also describes assessment of the impacts on the environment to acceptable levels.

1.4. PURPOSE OF EIA The proposed project activity is listed at Sr. No. 6(a) under Category ‘A’ of the Schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and the small section of pipeline passes through Wild Ass Sanctuary and Hadkiya Creek, which is under Tidal influence. Therefore EC under project / activity 6(a) is applicable Application in prescribed format of Form- I, Pre-feasibility report along-with proposed TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study for the proposed pipeline project was submitted to EAC (Industry – 2), MoEF&CC, New Delhi on 7th May, 2016. The proposal was considered by Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry – 2), MoEF&CC, New Delhi during its 9th meeting held on 27th - 28th June, 2016. The committee approved the Terms of Reference Vide F. No. J-11011/144/2016-IA.II(I) dated 2nd August, 2016 (Annexure – II). The purpose of this EIA is to assess the potential environmental impacts due to the proposed project. The assessment covers both construction and operation phases of the project.

1.5. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF WORK 1.5.1 Objective of the Study Preparation and submission of EIA report incorporating baseline data with respect to environmental components viz. Air, Noise, Water, Land, Biological and Socio-economic aspects, identification, prediction and evaluation of impacts, suggestion of EMP for mitigation of adverse impacts including environmental monitoring and risk and disaster management plan for getting environmental clearance from MoEF&CC, New Delhi.

1.5.2 Scoping before ToR DESR (Detailed Engineering Survey Report) for the selection of site is prepared by M/s SECON Pvt. Ltd. through comprehensive survey considering all the environmental and natural aspects including seismicity. As pipeline route has already surveyed by M/s SECON Pvt. Ltd. and hence alternative site selection options are not applicable to EIA consulting organization. Reconnaissance was carried out prior to proceed for approved ToR. Standard ToR was referred and major aspects/issues and impacts were identified considering site specific attributes involved and ToR was proposed. Relevant project specific and site informations were collected from DESR for the proposed ToR.

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-6

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

1.5.3 Scope of Work Scope of work is given as following:  Assessment of environmental and social impacts due to proposed pipeline on various environmental components viz., air, noise, water, biological, land and socio-economic during laying, commissioning and operation of the pipeline along with Sectionalized Valve Station stations (SV stations)  Suggestion / recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts comprising preventive/control technologies, safeguards, etc.  Delineation of Environmental Management Plan based on best National / International Technological Practices and Guidelines  Delineation of post-project environmental monitoring and vigilance programme  Provide technical assistance to Gujarat State Petronet Ltd. (GSPL) in preparation of requisite documents and presenting those in public Hearings at the respective District Head Quarters, enroute pipeline, including State Pollution Control Board and MoEF&CC.

1.6. CONTENT OF EIA REPORT EIA Report has been divided into chapters. The chapter Schemes for the preparation of EIA for the proposed project will be as follows:

Chapter 1.0: Introduction This chapter provides background information of the project, brief description and objectives of the project, description of the area, scope, methodology and organization of the study.

Chapter 2.0: Project Description This chapter presents the background information on the existing and proposed project activities, technology being adopted, sources of pollution and proposed control measures.

Chapter 3.0: Description of Environment This chapter presents the methodology and findings of field studies undertaken to establish the baseline conditions.

Chapter 4.0: Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures This chapter details the inferences drawn from the environment impact assessment of the project during development and operational phase. It describes the overall impacts of the project and underscores the areas of concern which need mitigation measures.

Chapter 5.0: Technology Alternatives This chapter presents the technology alternatives considered for the proposed pipeline project.

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-7

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

Chapter 6.0: Environmental Monitoring Programme This chapter provides recommendations for Environment Management Plan (EMP) including mitigation measures for minimizing the negative environmental impacts of the project. Environmental monitoring requirements for effective implementation of mitigative measures during operation of the project along with required institutional arrangements for their implementation.

Chapter 7.0: Additional Studies This chapter covers the details of Public Hearing proceedings, risk involved in the project, Disaster Management Plan, Occupational Health and Safety and summary of other special studies as per TOR conditions.

Chapter 8.0: Cost Benefits Analysis This chapter relates with the environmental benefits and cost related to the activities. The economic benefits out of the project for the region/note and the country.

Chapter 9.0: Project Benefits This chapter presents the details of Enterprise Social Commitment programmes that are being undertaken in nearby villages.

Chapter 10.0: Environmental Management Plan This chapter presents the details of institutional arrangements for environment protection and conservation. Organization structure for environment management is also brought out.

Chapter 11.0: Justification of Project Implementation, Summary and Conclusions This chapter contains the justification for project implementation, summary of the project, baseline environmental status and the mitigation measures suggested to mitigate the impacts.

Chapter 12.0: Disclosure of Consultants This chapter contains the list of various experts engaged in preparing the EIA report along with brief introduction of the consultancy

1.6 ToR COMPLIANCE The ToR compliance is given below:

Sr. Scope of ToR Compliance No. A. Specific ToR 1 Justification of the project Chapter 2, Para- 2.2 Chapter 11, Para- 11.1 2 Route map indicating project location Chapter 1, Index Fig. 1.1 to Figure 1.3. The Detailed Route Maps Attached as Annexure-

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-8

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

Sr. Scope of ToR Compliance No. 1 & Chapter-2, Para-2.3 3 Details of land to be acquired. Details of Chapter 2, Para- 2.3.3 & 2.3.4 . projects vis-à-vis ESAs and approvals thereof Annexure XV -Forest Annexure- XVI- WLS, Annexure-XVII-ESA 4 Project location along with map of 1 km area Chapter 1, Figure 1.1 to Figure 1.3 & (500 meters on either side of the pipeline from Detailed Route Maps Attached as Annexure- centerline) and site details providing various 1 industries, surface water bodies, forests etc. Chapter 2, Para 2.3.2 & 2.3.5. Also Site details attached as Annexure- DERS. 5 Analysis of alternative sites and Technology Chapter 5, Para 5.1 to 5.2. 6 Location of National Park/Wild life sanctuary / Chapter 2, Para-2.3.3 & Para-2.3.4. Figure- Reserve Forest within 10 km radius of the 2.2 project 7 Recommendation of SCZMA / CRZ clearance GCZMA Recommendation to MOEF &CC for the proposed pipeline vide letter dtd. 04-09-2017 attached as Annexure 8 Present land use based on satellite imagery Furnished in Chapter 3, Page No. 3-52 to 3- for the study area of 10 km radius 58 and detailed study of LU/LC covered under Annexure VIII. 9 Details of applications filed for forest clearance The Forest time details given in Annexure to be obtained for the project for the forest XIV. land involved in the project along with details of the compensatory afforestation 10 Process Description along with Process Flow Chapter 2, Para 2.4 Diagram 11 Details of water consumption and source of Chapter 2, Para 2.4.5, 2.4.5.1, 2.4.5.2 water supply, Waste water generation, Chapter 4, Para 4.3 treatment and effluent disposal. 12 Detailed solid & hazardous waste generation, Chapter 2, Section 2.4.7 - Quantification of collection, segregation, its recycling and reuse, waste during construction and operation treatment and disposal. phase. Chapter 4, Para 4.3 Mitigation measures and management plan Chapter 10, Para 10.4, Section 10.4.5 13 Total cost of the project along with total capital Total cost of the project: 1058.40 crores and cost & recurring cost/annum for environmental Environmental Management Plan has given pollution control measures. in Chapter 10, Para 10 & EMP Cost at Para

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-9

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

Sr. Scope of ToR Compliance No. 10.9. 14 Site-specific micro-meteorological data for Chapter 3, Subchapter 3.2, Section 3.2.2 & temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind Section 3.2.3 on Page 3-3 to 3-9. speed and direction and rainfall for one season at one location. 15 At total of 30 locations, ambient air quality Baseline air quality monitoring was carried monitoring within the study area of 500 m out in March-May 2016 (pre-monsoon along the pipeline route and around the season-2016) NAAQ standard and results pumping station and delivery station for PM10, are presented in Chapter 3 as per ToR. The SO2, NOx, CO, HC, VOC for one season (Non details regarding Air Environment given in Monsoon) taking into account the pre- Subchapter 3.2, Page no. 3-1 to 3-25 and dominant wind direction at the representative the details of Ambient Air Quality Results locations covering populations zone and enclosed in Annexure VII. sensitive receptors including reserved forests. 16 Determination of atmospheric inversion level Chapter 4, Subchapter 4.1, Section 4.1.1 on and assessment of ground level concentration Page No. 4-1 to 4-6 and details covered in of pollutants. Air quality modelling for Annexure XI. proposed project. 17 At about 10 locations, water monitoring will be Chapter 3, Subchapter 3.4, Page No. 3-40 to conducted including surface & ground water 3-52. for one season (Non Monsoon) 18 At 15 locations, Soil Sample Analysis within Chapter 3, Subchapter 3.5 Page No. 3-52 to the study area for one season (Non Monsoon) 3.58 and in details covered in Annexure IX. 19 At 30 locations, noise Monitoring will be taken Chapter 3, Subchapter 3.3, Page No. 3-26 to up for one season (Non Monsoon) 3-40 20 Demography & socio-economics of the study Chapter 3, Subchapter 3.7, 3.7.1 Page No. area 3-78 to 3-95 21 Ecological features (terrestrial & Aquatic) of Chapter 3, subchapter 3.6, Page no. 3-58 to the study area for one season (Non Monsoon) 3-78 22 Assessment of impact on air, water, soil, Furnished in Chapter 4, Subchapter 4.1 to solid/hazardous waste and noise levels. 4.4, Page No. 4-1 to 4-24 23 Air pollution control measures proposed for the Impact identification /evaluation of all effective control of gaseous emissions within environmental parameters are given in permissible limits. Chapter 2, Subsection 2.5. Details Furnished in Chapter 4, Subchapter 4.1, Chapter 10, Subchapter 10.4, Section 10.4.2 24 Details of proposed preventive measures for Chapter 7, Table 7.6 to 7.16, Page no. 7-49 leakages and accident to 7-55

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-10

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

Sr. Scope of ToR Compliance No. 25 Risk assessment including hazard Chapter 7 Page no. 7-1 to 7-57 identification, Consequence Analysis, Risk Assessment and preparation of Disaster Management Plan as per Regulations 26 Corrosion Management of Pipeline Chapter 7, Subchapter 7.6, Section 7.6.2.1 Page 7-16 to Page 7-17 27 Details of proposed restoration of land after Chapter 10, Subchapter 10.4, Section 10.4.5 laying the pipelines Chapter 4, Subchapter 4.4 at Page 4-15 to 4-17 28 Details of proposed Occupational Health Chapter 10, Sub-chapter 10.6 .Quality HSE surveillance program for the employees and Policy of GSPL given in Annexure - XIII. other labour 29 Detailed Environment management plan Chapter 10, Page 10-1 to 10.20 (EMP) with specific reference to Energy Chapter 6: Env. Monitoring Plan & conservation and natural resource Procedures conservation, details of air pollution control system, water & wastewater management, monitoring measure will be provided. 30 Public hearing to be conducted in 3 districts Will be furnished after Public Hearing through which the pipeline passes. Point-wise comments/ reply to the issues raised during Public Hearing / Public consultation B. Additional ToR i Public hearing to be conducted in three Will be carried out and issues raised will be districts and issues raised and commitments complied. made by the project proponent on the same should be included in EIA/EMP report in the form of tabular chart with financial budget for complying with the commitments made.

Chapter 1- Introduction 1-11

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 TYPE OF PROJECT AND CAPACITY The proposed project is planned to be developed by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Ltd. (GSPL). This project aims at establishing pipeline network covering the states of Gujarat to take care of future demand-supply gap of natural gas. GSPL proposes to lay Anjar-Chotila gas Pipeline approx. 196.14 km network of gas pipeline for the supply of natural gas to fulfill the requirements of various consumers. There will be 11 surface facilities (SV/IP/RT/DT) along the pipeline route at designated locations for the proper maintenance of the pressure and flow of natural gas and accordingly distribution. The flow of the gas through pipeline will be approx. 23.13 MMSCMD. The proposed pipeline will help to create network in the region for supply to the consumers which will help to increase the economic growth of the region.

2.2 JUSTIFICATION & NEED OF PROJECT The project is required to meet the growing demands of Natural Gas in Gujarat. Thus GSPL proposes to lay dedicated Natural Gas transportation Pipeline from Anjar (Kutch) to Chotila (Surendranagar ) to supply Natural Gas in most efficient manner. Pipelines are internationally recognized as the preferred alternative for transport of fuels from the point of view of safety, economy and relative environmentally friendliness. The pipeline will help in decongestion of roads, eventually minimizing road accidents and environmental pollution that are generated by other means of transport. As India has witnessed rapid urban and industrial growth in the past two decades, and with the country’s current liberalization policy this growth is expected to accelerate and need additional energy for development. As a consequence of the rapid rate of industrialization in India, fuel needs are increasing at an equally rapid rate and the supply-demand gap is widening and steps must be taken to address this issue. Overload transport of fuels by trucks is uneconomical, unsafe, and is a contributor to environmental degradation in terms of the fuel consumed and pollutants released by vehicles in transit and by accidents and spillages (common on Indian roads). Pipelines are internationally recognized as the preferred alternative for transport of fuels from the point of view of safety, economy and relative environmentally friendliness. The qualities of underground pipelines that make them desirable from these angles are that they are buried underground (at minimum depth of 1-1.2 m) and are controlled by SCADA systems. The road and rail transportation systems, at present, have to share the load of transporting raw materials and finished products from the supply centers to the demand / consumer centers. Rail transport is utilized for carrying bulk of the petroleum products throughout the country and the balance quantity is transported by road. This is stretching the transport sector capacity and hiring the movement of other essential raw materials and products. Transportation of gas by underground pipeline is comparatively less expensive than the other modes of transport both in the capital and operating costs. If a good network of pipelines is implemented throughout the country, this will ensure that the pipeline transported products will be available to the consumers at a lower cost than alternate modes of transport.

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-1

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

2.3. Project Description Proposed Chotila-Anjar Pipeline will originate from GSPL's ARPL SV-8 TOP-8, Village Ratanpar, Taluk Sayla & district Surendranagar of Gujarat and runs through Surendranagar, Morbi & Kuchchh regions and terminates at GSPL's dispatch station at village Rata Talav, Taluk Anjar & district Kutch of Gujarat State. Generally, the pipeline runs in North-west direction from take-off to terminal point through cross country of Gujarat State.

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-2

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

2.3.1 Size or Magnitude or Operation GSPL has proposed to lay a gas pipeline from Chotila-Anjar approx. 196.14 km as underground natural gas pipeline including various associated facilities such as Tap-off / Metering / Receiving / Dispatch / Intermediate Pigging / Sectionalized valve stations.

LENGTH OF PIPELINE 196.14 KM DIAMETER OF PIPELINE 36” NO. OF SV (SECTIONALIZING VALVE) / IP 8 + 1 IP (INTERMEDIATE PIGGING) STATION NO. OF DISPATCH TERMINAL (DT) 1 NO. OF RECEIVING TERMINAL (RT) 1 STORAGE Nil PRODUCT Natural Gas CAPACITY OF PROPOSED PIPELINE Approx. 23.13 MMSCMD

2.3.2 Location of the Project and Site Selection Gujarat State Petronet Ltd. (GSPL) proposed Chotila-Anjar Pipeline will originate from village Ratanpar (GSPL's ARPL SV-8 TOP- 8) Taluka; Salaya & District; Surendranagar, Gujarat and pipeline stretch will cover a distance of 196.14 km, that runs through Surendranagar, Morbi & Kutch regions and terminates at GSPL's Dispatch station at village RataTalav, Taluk Anjar & District Kutch of Gujarat State. Alternative routes are examined and the present route as stated above is finalized based on least disturbance to the environment, human habitations, forest, aquatic bodies. The route is optimized considering the above factors and connectivity between supply and demand points. However, the proposed pipeline is passing through Gujarat state avoiding forest areas or in any event, it is passing through forest areas, separate forest clearance or permission will be obtained as per Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 and subsequent amendment thereof.

Pipeline Alignment Detail SL.NO. CHAINAGE (KM) LENGTH TALUKA DISTRICT STATE

FROM TO (KM) 1 0/00 14/566.99 14/566.99 Sayla Surendranagar Gujarat 2 14/566.99 26/320.83 11/753.84 Thangadh Surendranagar 3 26/320.83 41/703.04 15/382.21 Muli Surendranagar 4 41/703.04 58/961.40 17/258.36 Halavad Morbi 5 58/961.40 85/952.68 26/991.28 Morbi Morbi 6 85/952.68 100/939.55 14/986.87 Maliya Morbi 7 100/939.55 111/897.95 10/958.40 Salt Pan Area, Kutch 8 111/897.95 173/244.09 61/346.14 Bhachau Kutch

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-3

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

9 173/244.09 196/140.02 22/895.93 Anjar Kutch TOTAL 196/140.02

2.3.3 LAND FOR LAYING PIPELINE

PERMANENT LAND ACQUISITION FOR ASSOCIATED FACILITIES STATIONS: For transportation of natural gas through pipeline, there is a need to acquire the permanent land for associated facilities stations such as Sectionizing Valve Stations/ Intermediate Pigging Stations, Receiving Terminal & Dispatch Terminal (SV/IP/RT/DT) at interval of approx. 20-25 km through pipeline depending upon the class location & availability of land. SV Stations helps to maintain the pressure levels of the flow of gas during shutdown(if any) & in case of any emergency without effecting the flow of gas to customers .  Number of Surface facilities (SV/IP/RT/DT) on pipeline route approx. 11 numbers.  Area per SV/IP/RT/DT is approx. 60*60 sq.mt.  Total Land Area to be acquired permanently is approx.= 11* 0.36 = 3.96 Ha

Criteria for selection of Land for Stations/ Terminals enroute the Pipeline  Good Approach Road.  Availability of Electric power source nearby  Availability of land for Anode Bed  Distances from SV as per ASME B 31.8 guidelines

Statement showing Chainage wise land under ECO Sensitive Zone & Land under Wild Ass Sanctuary.

Sr. Chainage Length Land Status Remarks no. (km) / Area (hect.) 79/307 to 19.370 Land falls in Eco Proposal for laying 1 98/677 sensitive Zone pipeline in Sanctuary Area has submitted 98/677 to 0.145 P/L falls in Sanctuary vide GSPL Letter No. 2 98/822 Area GSPL/ Chotila – Anjar/ WL/ PER/ 98/822 to 13.092 Land falls in Eco 3 2016 Dated 111/914 sensitive Zone 07.01.2016 and same 111/914 to 0.591 P/L falls in Sanctuary 4 has recommended 112/505 Area vide DCF Wild Ass 112/505 to 0.266 Land falls in Eco Sanctuary, 5 112/771 sensitive Zone Dhrangdhara Letter 112/771 to 0.247 P/L falls in Sanctuary No. A/ Jaman/ T-3/ 6 113/018 Area 75-76 of 2017-18 113/018 to 0.867 Land falls in Eco Dated 27.04.2017. 7 Recently fresh 113/885 sensitive Zone

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-4

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

113/885 to 2.561 P/L falls in Sanctuary proposal submitted 8 116/446 Area for Eco Sensitive 116/446 to 0.292 Land falls in Eco Zone for 98.368 km. 9 116/738 sensitive Zone 116/738 to 0.927 P/L falls in Sanctuary 10 117/665 Area 117/665 to 0.192 Land falls in Eco 11 117/857 sensitive Zone 117/857 to 1.204 P/L falls in Sanctuary 12 119/061 Area 119/061 to 64.289 Land falls in Eco 13 183/350 sensitive Zone (1) 05.675 Wild Life Sanctuary (2) 98.368 Eco Sensitive Zone

Forest Crossings: Proposed pipeline is running through following unavoidable forest land in Gujarat State. Separate forest clearance or permission will be obtained as per Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 and subsequent amendment thereof:

Pipeline ROU in Mtr. Sl. Length/ Area in Name of Forest Description No. Chainage Hect. Division Length Width in Km Sapar Forest, Village Sapar, Taluk 1 L= 0/850 850 10 0.8500 Sayla Dharadungari Forest, Village Dy. Conservator 2 L= 0/097 97 10 0.0970 Dharadungri, Taluk Sayla of Forests, Territorial Sitagadh Reserved Forest Village 3 L=1/330 1330 10 1.3300 Division, Sitagadh, Taluk Sayla Surendranagar Gugliana Reserved Forest, Village 4 L= 0/048 48 10 0.0480 Gugliana, Taluk Chotila Total Area 2.3250 (RF) National Highway No.47 (NH 8A) 5 (Chotila - Ahmedabad) crossing, 3/333.87 10 X 2 10 0.0200 Village Ratanpar, Taluk Chotila Dy. Conservator Western BG Railway Line of Forests, Social 6 (Mahesana-Rajkot-Okha Section), 17/267.03 10 X 2 10 0.0200 Forestry Division, Village Than, Taluk Chotila Surendranagar State Highway-119 (Halvad - Than) 7 30/126.01 10 X 2 10 0.0200 crossing, Village Ranipat, Taluk Muli Total Area 0.0600 (PF) State Highway -318 (Wankaner - 8 Halvad) crossing, Khetardi, Taluk 43/120.80 10 X 2 10 0.0200 Dy. Conservator of Halvad Forests, Morbi 9 State Highway -22 (Halvad - 61/344.30 10 X 2 10 0.0200 Forest Div.

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-5

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

Morbi) crossing, Village Andarna, Taluk Morbi State Highway -32 (Morbi - Jetpur) 10 crossing, Village Jetpur 79/210.31 10 X 2 10 0.0200 Machhukantha, Taluk Morbi National Highway No.27 (Morbi - 11 Maliya - Samakhiali) crossing, 91/728.94 10 X 2 10 0.0200 Village Khirdi, Taluk Maliya Total Area 0.0800 (PF) Dy. Conservator of Sikarpur Reserved Forest, Village 12 L=0/640 640 10 0.6400 Forests, (E) Forest Sikarpur, Taluk Bhachau Division, Kachchh Total Area 0.6400 (RF) National Highway No.41 (Samakhiali to Gandhidham) 13 143/608.73 10 X 2 10 0.0200 crossing, Village Vondh, Taluk Bhachau Dy. Conservator of State Highway 42 (Bhachau to Forests, Social 14 Chandrani) crossing, Village Sikra, 159/913.50 10 X 2 10 0.0200 Forestry Division, Taluk Bhachau Kutch State Highway (Satpar to 15 Lakhapar) crossing, Village 192/089.96 10 X 2 10 0.0200 Satapar, Taluk Anjar Total Area 0.0600 (PF) Grand Total Area in Hect. 3.1650

1. Total Reserved Forest: 2.9650 2. Total Protected Forest: 0.2000

2.3.4 Wild Life Sanctuary: Proposed pipeline is running through Wild Ass Sanctuary in Gujarat State having length as given below:

Sr. Particulars of Chainage ( Km) Length Chainage ( Km) Length No. Environmental WLS overlapping (Km) ESZ of WLS (Km) Sensitive Locations CRZ area overlapping CRZ area 1 Pipeline Passing 111/914 112/44 0/526 101/16 111/914 10/754 through both CRZ & 113/885 114/54 0/655 113/54 113/885 0/345 WLS area Total 1.181 Total 11.099

CRZ Area: Proposed pipeline is running through CRZ area having length as given below:

Sr.No. Particulars of Chainage ( Km) Lengt Remarks Environmental Sensitive h (Km) Locations 2 Pipeline Passing through 101/16 112/44 11/28 For the critical creek crossings

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-6

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

Tidal Influence (CRZ) Horizontal Directional Drilling area and at ch. (HDD) will be adopted and at other 109/272.48 passing places HDD/open cut method with through Hadakiya Creek. concrete coating (if required) shall be used based on topography of the crossing by taking necessary statutory permission 113/57 114/54 0/97 Total 12.25

2.3.5 Detail about crossing

Sl. No. Type of Crossing No. of Crossings 1 National Highway 3 2 Railway 4 3 State Highway 9 4 MDR/Asphalted/Metalled /RCC Road 52 5 River 12 6 Canal 14 Total 94

River Crossings:

Width of Progressive Sl. Details of RL Location of Type of River Crossing Chainage CS No. No. Crossing (m) Occurrence (m) (km) 1 Bhogava River Non - perennial 156.70 172.99 IP12/1-TP13 04/786.54 3 2 Brahmani River Non - perennial 113.26 45.55 IP61/1-IP61/2 23/705.17 15 3 Brahmani River Non - perennial 88.09 71.82 IP83/1-IP83/2 35/991.74 23 4 Brahmani River Non - perennial 86.41 130.50 TP90-IP90/1 41/701.78 26 5 Ghodadhral River Non - perennial 62.44 27.81 IP120/1-IP120/2 58/309.39 33 6 Ghodadhral River Non - perennial 50.83 29.56 IP127/1-IP127/2 63/813.71 40 7 Ghodadhral River Non - perennial 26.40 91.95 IP134/1-IP134/2 71/578.54 45 8 Ghodadhral River Non - perennial 14.59 144.43 IP147/3-IP147/4 81/672.59 54 9 Khara River Non - perennial 12.79 54.50 IP150/1-IP150/2 84/634.81 55 10 Machchhu River perennial 2.83 129.92 IP175/1-IP175/2 98/742.29 67 11 Sakra River Non - perennial 20.09 133.79 IP317/1-IP317/2 176/035.05 120 12 Churva River Non - perennial 54.54 28.34 IP339/1-IP339/2 192/868.89 128

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-7

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

2.3.6 Selection of Technology Pipeline laying and transportation of Natural gas through it is an established practice worldwide. GSPL is using latest technology and construction machinery for laying of pipeline and transportation of natural gas throughout Gujarat State and established a transportation network to supply it to the consumers and allied industries. The same technology will be used for laying the proposed pipeline (196.14 KM) from Anjar to Chotila with advanced safety measures. The adopted technology is proven world class standard, environment friendly and cost effective.

2.3.7 Soil Profile Mostly dry & wet cultivated fields of vegetable include cotton, wheat, jowar, fennel & groundnut. Overall Communication network along pipeline route is good.

2.3.8 Landuse / Landcover

Sr. Type of land from with pipeline RoU (m) Total Length RoU (m2 ) RoU (Ha) No. passes through (m) 1 Non Forest Land 20 1815183 36303660 363.036 2 Forest Land 10 3165 31650 3.165 3 Wild Ass Sanctuary 10 5675 56750 5.675 4 Hadakiya Creek/ Salt pan 10 12250 122500 12.25 Total 384.126 2.3.9 Environmental sensitivity

Sr.No. Particulars of Environmental Sensitive Locations Chainage ( Km) Length (Km) 1 Little Rann of Kuchchh, Wild Ass Sanctuary 100/30 111/30 11/0 (Dhrangadhra) 2 Pipeline Passing through Hadakiya Creek, which is 101/16 112/44 11/28 under Tidal Influence (CRZ) 113/57 114/54 0/97

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-8

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

Note: CRZ Map enclosed as Annexure III, Gujarat Government Gazette Notification is enclosed as Annexure IV and Annexure V.

Anjar

Chotila

HADAKIYA CREEK PARALLEL TO NATIONAL HIGHWAY

Anjar

Chotila

PLATE 2.1: PROPOSED ACPL-PARALLEL TO NATIONAL HIGHWAY

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-9

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

FIGURE 2.1: CRZ MAP FOR ANJAR CHOTILA PIPELINE

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-10

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

FIGURE 2.2: WILD ASS SANCTUARY

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-11

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

2.4. PROCESS DETAILS AND INFRASTRUCTURAL FACILITIES The production and manufacturing is not involved, as the project is for transportation of natural gas. (Plate 2.2).

2.4.1. TRANSPORTATION PROCESS OF NATURAL GAS

Import of LNG at Regasification Take off point Mundra Terminal to Natural Gas of Mundra- Anjar pipeline

Anjar Proposed Receiving P/L Terminal of Mundra Anjar P/L

Receiving terminal at Chotila

Presently Proposed Project

PLATE 2.2 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMS

2.4.2. Phase of Project

2.4.1.1 Construction Phase For Pipeline Laying: The pipeline construction is proposed to be carried out through deployment of 2 to 3 spreads. The sequence and methodology of construction of new pipeline is given below: 1. Clearing and Grading - A 20 m wide Right of Use (RoU) area will be cleared off vegetation and other obstacles such as boulders. 2. Stringing - Pipes are transported to the site on trucks will be offloaded using side booms. Pipes are then strung adjacent to the trench. Trailers and cranes will be used for maneuvering of pipes. This activity may be done before or after trenching. 3. Trenching - Trenchers and backhoe type excavators will be used to dig the trench for laying the pipeline. The topsoil in agricultural areas will be removed and stockpiled for restoration. The excavated sub-soil will be stockpiled separately for backfill. 4. Bending - Pipes will be bent using a bending machine to the appropriate angle to match the vertical and horizontal alignment of the trench. 5. Welding - Welding will be done using conventional manual/ semi-automatic welding involving a crew of welders and fitters.

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-12

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

6. Non-Destructive Inspection - Mechanized Ultrasonic Testing (MUT) is the specified method to be applied for the execution of NDT. Each field weld will be 100% radiographed to test for soundness of the weld in compliance with specifications. NDT and its evaluation shall be performed in accordance with API Standard 1104. 7. Coating - After welding at each weld joint, coating of field joints of bare pipes and the repair of coating shall be done 8. Lowering - Padding will be provided, wherever required, in the bottom of trench to prevent damage to the coating. 9. Burial - General burial depth of the pipeline along the route will be with a minimum 1.0 m cover. Burial cover will be compacted to avoid future erosion by all weathers. 10. Backfilling - The excavated sub-soil will be returned to the trench. The topsoil, which has been preserved on the side of the ROU, will be spread over the filled up trench. A crown of soil will be kept on top of the trenched portion to allow for future settlement. Backfilling will be managed so that damage from sizable rocks is not used or any other materials that may damage the pipeline. 11. Crossings - The method used for the crossing of waterways and other infrastructure facilities will vary from place to place depending on the environmental setting and the geo-technical features of the area. For the critical river/canal crossings Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) will be adopted and at other places open cut method shall be used based on topography of the crossing by taking necessary statutory permission 12. Restoration - Restoration of the ROU will be conducted progressively following the completion of construction work. This will involve removal of foreign materials such as construction debris and wastes. The ROU will be returned to its original condition by spreading the topsoil over the areas from where it was stripped, so that agricultural activities will be restored. Special focus will be given to restoration of side slopes and beds of natural water body crossings. 13. Pipeline warning markers–In the final stages of construction, warning marker posts will be erected indicating the location of the pipeline and the crossing of other pipelines, cables and features. A marker tape will be placed in the trench 500 mm above the pipeline to indicate to future excavators that a pipeline is below and that they are nearing.

2.4.1.2 Construction Phase For associated facilities At SV station sites, the construction will be undertaken within the station. The other steps of construction shall be more or less same as the pipeline given below:  Clearing of the identified location  Modification of the boundary wall wherever required.  Leveling and approach road laying  Foundation works  Construction water supply  Structural works  Mechanical erection

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-13

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

2.4.1.3 Operation Phase For Pipeline The activities involved in the operational phase of the project are as follows: 1. Commissioning of the pipeline: Prior to commissioning of the pipeline, a number of pre- commissioning operations like cleaning and hydrostatic testing of pipeline, starting of mechanical and rotating equipments will be carried out. After successful pre-commissioning activities, the pipeline shall be commissioned for transfer of Natural Gas. 2. Utilities: The water requirement in the stations during the operational phase will be met by bore wells or outsourced through road tankers. 3. Normal operation: During the normal operation of pipeline, the activities will be mainly confined to the battery limits of terminals. 4. Infrastructure facilities: Infrastructure facilities to support the anticipated worker population and the project like municipal facilities, firefighting facilities, sewerage maintenance, power supply, water supply and maintenance etc, will be provided where ever required. 5. Post construction protection system: The entire pipeline will be protected against external corrosion by a cathodic protection system. Pipe external coating will be done at the coating plant before it is transported to site. 6. Inspection of pipeline: Regular inspection of the pipeline shall be carried out as per standard practices. A SCADA monitoring and control system will be utilized ensuring effective and reliable control, management and supervision of the pipeline network system. In addition to SCADA, physical patrolling along the pipeline route will also be carried out by line walkers daily.

2.4.1.4 Operation Phase For Associated Facilities: Once the pipeline is commissioned, there will be a regular visit by the operation engineers as per drawn up schedule to ensure safe operations. Inspection work will be undertaken on a routine basis. Inspection pigs will be propelled in the pipeline once in two years to check the health and dimension of the pipeline.

2.4.3. CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL Carbon steel pipelines of 36’’diameter will be laid for a total length of 196.14 km. Pipe material and pipe type are API 5L Gr. X-70 PSL-2 and LSAW/HSAW respectively. It will be commissioned as per PNGRB guidelines. For SV stations construction materials such as MS, sand/ soil, cement, diesel oil etc. will be procured from local sources. GSPL will follow the codes and regulations to meet National and International standards.

2.4.4. RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION / RECYCLING AND REUSE ENVISAGED IN THE PROJECT Resource Optimization / recycling and reuse envisaged in the Project  All the construction and testing equipment used in the project will be put to use in other similar project once the project is completed.  Water used for hydrostatic testing of pipes during commissioning will be stored and used for other pipes.

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-14

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

 Rain water harvesting and recycled water will be used for sanitary purposes, green belt development and gardening purposes as practicable.

2.4.5. WATER SOURCE & CONSUMPTION The source water requirement for pipeline construction is minimum, which will be met through Road tankers from available sources in the nearby area. However, during operation phase water will be sourced from bore or dug well inside the SV Stations for domestic purpose and tree plantation depending upon the requirements.

2.4.5.1. WATER CONSUMPTION Water consumption will be Max. 50-60 KL/day during Construction period, and during operations it will be approx. 20 KL/day.

2.4.5.2. WASTEWATER GENERATION During construction phase the liquid wastes generated from the construction camp will be discharged through soak pit/septic tank. Similarly the domestic waste generated from the SV stations will also be sent to septic tank/ soak pit. During construction, the marginal liquid effluent or spoiled / drained lubricants oil generated at construction camp will be disposed off as per SPCB guidelines. No waste water on continuous basis from pipeline operations is envisaged. During operation phase domestic waste water will be generated at Stations and that will be disposed to the septic tank/ soak pit. The waste water generated during the hydrostatic testing of euipment & pipeline is temporary & one time activity. The same water will be reused for multiple tests in other sections. The residual hydrotesting waste water at the end of test will be non-toxic & disposed off suitably.

2.4.6. ELECTRICITY (POWER REQUIREMENT) Required power for SV / IP / Dispatch / Receiving shall be drawn from nearest local power source of the state Electricity Boards. Approx. 11 Nos. of DG sets with each have capacity of 50 KVA will be provided. However, DG sets will be kept as standby at Stations.

2.4.7. SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES Solid Waste: Marginal amount of solid watse will be generated at the camp site along the pipeline route, and same will be disposed as per SPCB/CPCB guidelines. Quantity of wastes generated is expected to be 0.2-0.5 kg/per capita/day during construction activities (plastics, waste papers and card board, etc). Solid wastes generated will be properly collected, segregated and reused / disposed off appropriately. On completion of construction works, all temporary structures, surplus materials and wastes will be completely removed and land will be reinstated to near its original state. Dumping of construction waste on agricultural land will be prohibited. Only excavation soil will be generated during construction, which will be reinstated to near original condition after laying the pipeline.

Hazardous waste: generated at the time of construction will be used oil, chemical & lube oil barrel, batteries, welding electrodes etc and will be disposed as to SPCB authorized recycler/dealer/TSDF sites.

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-15

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

Hazardous wastes generated during operational activities in the form of spent oil from DG sets, equipments & pigging waste etc., will be reused as lubricant and drums will be disposed off as per SPCB/CPCB guidelines. The detailed estimation of solid waste generation during construction and operation phase is as follows:

SOLID WASTE GENERATION (Kg/day)

Sr. No. PARTICULARS Workers/Manpower SOLID WASTE GENERATION (Kg/day) A. PIPELINE ROUTE Construction Phase 100 100 X 0.5 = 50 Kg/day B Operation Phase 06 0.5 X 06 = 03 Kg/day C SV STATION (11 Nos.) Construction Phase 10 x 11 = 110 110 x 0.5 = 55 Kg/day (5 Skilled, 3 Unskilled and 2 security) D Operation Phase 2 x 11 = 22 22 x 0.5 =11 Kg/day

A. Along the pipeline route: The domestic solid waste generation during construction phase will be 50 Kg/day and during operation phase it will be 3 Kg/day so the total domestic waste generation 53 Kg/day along pipeline route

B. In SV station: The domestic solid waste generation during construction phase will be 55 kg/day and during operation phase it will be 11 kg/day so the total domestic waste generation will be 66 kg/day.

2.4.8. TRANSPORTATION It is intended to make maximum use of the existing infrastructure and augment/ strengthen existing roads, wherever required. Hence no major changes are envisaged due to this buried natural gas pipeline project.

2.4.9. REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (R & R) PLAN (i) Policy to be adopted (Central / State) in respect of the project affected persons including home ousters, land ousters and landless laborers (a brief outline to be given) Not applicable, as there is no displacement involved. Land will be restored to its near original condition and returned back to the land owner.

2.4.10. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND COST ESTIMATES (i) Likely date of start of construction and likely date of completion

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-16

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

The project is expected to be completed within 3 years. The project will require one and half year for construction and testing & commissioning after completion of pre-project activities i.e. detailed Route survey, Engineering Design of the Project obtaining RoU/ROW and other statutory clearances for the project. (ii) Estimated project cost along with analysis in terms of economic viability of the project Cost of the Project: A detailed break-up of the cost for the proposed project for all the sections is follows: A cost under each head is estimated based on the available information and in-house data base. The total fund requirement for the company is Rs 1058.40 Crores

2.4.11. SOME SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT

Length of Pipeline 196.14 km Diameter of Pipeline 36” No. of SV (Sectionalizing Valve) / IP (Intermediate Pigging) 8 + 1 IP Station No. Of Dispatch Terminal (DT) 1 No. Of Receiving Terminal (RT) 1 Storage Nil Product Natural Gas Capacity of Proposed Pipeline Approx. 23.13 MMSCMD

Nearest Railway Station Railway Station Approx distance (City name) from pipeline (km) Anjar 5.0 Morbi 6.5 Than 5.0

Nearest Airport Airport (City Approx distance Name) from pipeline (km) Bhuj 38.0 Rajkot 55.0

Source of electricity State electricity board

The proposed pipeline will be a buried underground 1.0 to 1.2 and will be laid as per latest additions of OISD-226 & ASME B 31.5 and other applicable statuary standards and best available technology. It will be commissioned as per PNGRB guidelines. Due care is taken in selection of pipeline route by avoiding environmentally sensitive areas, Forests and National Parks, etc. However pipeline passes through Hadakiya creek and wild Ass Sanctuary which is unavoidable.

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-17

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

FIGURE 2.3: ANJAR-CHOTILA PROPOSED PIPELINE (ACPL) ROUTE

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-18

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

2.5 IMPACT IDENTIFICATION/EVALUATION

Environmental Environmental Impact Process Remarks Parameters Significant Insignificant Construction Phase Landuse/Land Land will be Procured from the Land will be restored - Cover owner for laying pipeline after laying the (Temp. Land loosing) pipeline Social - Temporary loss in crop - production, however, could be compensated in terms of economic benefits Selection Habitation Disturbance created due to Temporary activity, no - of Route project activity disturbance after activity is over Biological Cutting of trees, Loss of Compensatory tree - vegetation along the pipeline plantation along the route route corridor Road /Rail Disturbance and change in Temporary activity, will - /River /Pond course be restored again /Lake Crossing Air Fugitive emission, marginal Temporary activity, will - damage of vegetation and be restored again health Noise Increase in noise level due to Temporary activity, will - process activity causing be restored again Fatigue and annoyance Water Disturbance in natural Proper technology will - drainage regime be utilized during excavation Land Temporary agriculture loss Temporary activity, will - Excavation and soil quality be restored again Biological Loss of vegetation and Temporary activity, will - temporary disturbance of be restored again natural habitats for small mammals and herpetofauna due to access cutting Socio-economic positive significant impact due - to employment (Labour/Workers) and economic benefit Operational Phase Air - - No impact envisaged being buried pipeline Transport Noise - - No impact of Natural envisaged being Gas buried pipeline Water No impact Biology positive Impact due to - Act as a barrier for

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-19

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

Environmental Environmental Impact Process Remarks Parameters Significant Insignificant plantation that will be getting entry to the developed along the pipeline trespassers man corridor and animals Socio-economic Additional employment - Significant positive generation for patrolling the impact pipeline, infrastructural facilities will have to be developed for housing and sanitation along the route at significant locations with safety arrangement and communication network boosting local economy Air Emissions due to DG Set Low capacity (50 KVA) of DG set and will be on standby mode Noise Increase in noise generation Acoustic enclosure will due to DG Set and Pump be provided to DG set to reduce noise level. Water - Generation of No impact domestic waste & disposal in soak pit Biological Positive impact due to Green - Development of SV Station belt development within and small ecological around the SV station layout which will subsequently developed as creates aesthetic ecological layout. view and helpful for nesting and breeding ground for local avifauna. Socio-economic Positive impact due to - Significant positive Employment generation, impact boosting enhanced of economic better quality of benefits life. Air Possibility of emissions - Application of through voids in the soil strata early alarm and spread in the atmosphere system in SCADA leading to fire and human for automatic health shutdown of gas flow. Noise Possibility of rupture of - Application of Risk pipeline due to high pressure early alarm (Leakages) and corrosion through system in SCADA leakages and leading to fire on for automatic the surface `shutdown of gas flow. Biology Disturbance of habitat, - -Do- migration of fauna Socio-economic Health hazard due to Remote Chances -Do- explosion and fire

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-20

Laying of Anjar - Chotila Natural Gas transportation Pipeline (196.14 km) with associated facilities in state of Gujarat by M/s Gujarat State Petronet Limited

NOTE: This is a buried pipeline project for transportation of natural gas with all close and automatic system in place. As such, mostly there will be insignificant impacts. However, for any eventualities, SCADA system will be in operation to take care of any hazard to take place. There will be positive significant impact because of supply of gas by establishing distribution network to the consumers which will help to invite more industries in the region thereby the development of industrial growth and increase in economic benefit in the region which will also help to enhance the economic growth of the country. Moreover, the distribution network will also help the locals to get fuel in considerable and lower rate. Overall significant Impacts will be positive due to this project, capital investments will enhance National wealth of the country.

Chapter 2- Project Description 2-21