DOCSLIB.ORG

Design Temperature Limit Reference Guide (2019 Edition)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design Temperature Limit Reference Guide (2019 Edition) ENERGY STAR Single-Family New Homes ENERGY STAR Multifamily New Construction Design Temperature Limit Reference Guide (2019 Edition) These 2019 Edition limits are permitted to be used with any National HVAC Design Report, and are required to be used for all National HVAC Design Reports generated on or after 10-01-2020 Introduction One requirement of the ENERGY STAR Single-Family New Homes and Multifamily New Construction (MFNC) programs is to use outdoor design temperatures that do not exceed the maximum cooling season temperature and minimum heating season temperature listed in this reference guide for the state and county, or territory, in which the home is to be certified. Only two exceptions apply: 1. Jurisdiction-Specified Temperatures: If the outdoor design temperatures to be used in load calculations are specified by the jurisdiction where the home will be certified, then these specified temperatures shall be used. 2. Temperature Exception Request: In rare cases, the designer may believe that an exception to the limits in the reference guide are warranted for a particular state and county, or territory. If so, the designer must complete and submit a Design Temperature Exception Request, including a justification for the exception, to [email protected] for review and approval prior to the home’s certification. To obtain the most accurate load calculations, EPA recommends that designers always use the ACCA Manual J, 8th edition, 1% cooling season design temperature and 99% heating season design temperature for the weather location that is geographically closest to the home to be certified. How to Use this Reference Guide 1. Determine the state and county, or territory, in which the home is to be certified. 2. Locate the state and county, or territory, in Exhibit 1 of this document. 3. Utilize the corresponding design temperatures in the load calculations, as follows, and document the values in Item 3.3 of the National HVAC Design Report (Item 3.4 for MFNC): a. Use a cooling season outdoor design temperature less than or equal to the 1% Cooling Temperature. b. Use a heating season outdoor design temperature equal to or greater than the 99% Heating Temperature. 4. If a Condition B Climate will be used to select the cooling sizing limit, then utilize the corresponding HDD/CDD Ratio and document the value in Item 4.14.2 of the National HVAC Design Report (Item 4.21 for MFNC). Example: A home will be certified in Travis County, TX. By consulting the reference guide, we find that the cooling season outdoor design temperature limit is 99 °F and the heating season outdoor design temperature limit is 28 °F. This means that the designer must: • Use a cooling season design temperature that is less than or equal to 99 °F. • Use a heating season design temperature that is equal to or greater than 28 °F. • Not use the cooling sizing limit for a Condition B Climate because the HDD/CDD Ratio is 0.3, which is < 2.0. Methodology The temperatures in this reference guide utilize the 1% cooling and 99% heating design temperatures in the ASHRAE 2017 Handbook of Fundamentals and Manual J Design Conditions 8th Edition. ASHRAE weather stations are indicated with the label “(A)”, while Manual J weather stations are indicated with the label “(M)”. Individual counties or territories were assigned the cooling and heating limits and HDD/CDD ratios in this document using the following logic: • If one or more weather stations were located either within the county / territory or within a 40-mile radius from the county / territory’s geographic center, then the highest cooling, lowest heating design temperature, and the highest HDD/CDD ratio was selected from among these weather stations. • If no weather stations were located either within the county / territory or within a 40-mile radius from the county / territory’s geographic center, then the cooling and heating design temperatures and HDD/CDD ratios of the nearest three weather stations were averaged and assigned to the entire county / territory, and all three weather stations were listed. • If the selected or averaged cooling design temperature limit for a county / territory was < 80 °F, then the county / territory was assigned a value of 80 °F, and the weather station (or stations) that would have been selected was marked with an asterisk. • Cooling design temperatures were rounded up to the nearest integer (e.g., 90.2 °F rounded up to 91 °F), and heating design temperatures were rounded down to the nearest integer (e.g., 14.8 °F rounded down to 14 °F). Revised 4/27/2021 Page 1 of 141 ENERGY STAR Single-Family New Homes ENERGY STAR Multifamily New Construction Design Temperature Limit Reference Guide (2019 Edition) Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 How to Use this Reference Guide .................................................................................................................................. 1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Design Temperatures by State & County, or Territory ................................................................................................... 4 Alabama ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Alaska ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Arizona ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Arkansas .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 California .................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Connecticut .............................................................................................................................................................. 17 Delaware .................................................................................................................................................................. 17 District of Columbia .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Florida ...................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Georgia ..................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Guam ........................................................................................................................................................................ 27 Hawaii ....................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Idaho ........................................................................................................................................................................ 27 Illinois ....................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Indiana ...................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Iowa .......................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Kansas ..................................................................................................................................................................... 41 Kentucky................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Louisiana .................................................................................................................................................................. 51 Maine ........................................................................................................................................................................ 54 Maryland ................................................................................................................................................................... 55 Massachusetts ......................................................................................................................................................... 56 Michigan ..................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curiosity's Candidate Field Site in Gale Crater, Mars
    Curiosity’s Candidate Field Site in Gale Crater, Mars K. S. Edgett – 27 September 2010 Simulated view from Curiosity rover in landing ellipse looking toward the field area in Gale; made using MRO CTX stereopair images; no vertical exaggeration. The mound is ~15 km away 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 in this view. Note that one would see Gale’s SW wall in the distant background if this were Edgett, 1 actually taken by the Mastcams on Mars. Gale Presents Perhaps the Thickest and Most Diverse Exposed Stratigraphic Section on Mars • Gale’s Mound appears to present the thickest and most diverse exposed stratigraphic section on Mars that we can hope access in this decade. • Mound has ~5 km of stratified rock. (That’s 3 miles!) • There is no evidence that volcanism ever occurred in Gale. • Mound materials were deposited as sediment. • Diverse materials are present. • Diverse events are recorded. – Episodes of sedimentation and lithification and diagenesis. – Episodes of erosion, transport, and re-deposition of mound materials. 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 Edgett, 2 Gale is at ~5°S on the “north-south dichotomy boundary” in the Aeolis and Nepenthes Mensae Region base map made by MSSS for National Geographic (February 2001); from MOC wide angle images and MOLA topography 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 Edgett, 3 Proposed MSL Field Site In Gale Crater Landing ellipse - very low elevation (–4.5 km) - shown here as 25 x 20 km - alluvium from crater walls - drive to mound Anderson & Bell
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 Be It Enacted Hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the ^^"'^'/Or^ C ^ United States Of
    324 PUBLIC LAW 161-JULY 15, 1955 [69 STAT. Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 July 15.1955 AN ACT THa R 68291 *• * To authorize certain construction at inilitai-y, naval, and Air F<n"ce installations, and for otlier purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the an^^"'^'/ord Air Forc^e conc^> United States of America in Congress assembled^ struction TITLE I ^'"^" SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army is authorized to establish or develop military installations and facilities by the acquisition, con­ struction, conversion, rehabilitation, or installation of permanent or temporary public works in respect of the following projects, which include site preparation, appurtenances, and related utilities and equipment: CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES TECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Troop housing, community facilities, utilities, and family housing, $1,736,000. Black Hills Ordnance Depot, South Dakota: Family housing, $1,428,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Operational and mainte­ nance facilities, $509,000. Erie Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities and utilities, $1,933,000. Frankford Arsenal, Pennsylvania: Utilities, $855,000. LOrdstown Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities, $875,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, (^olorado: Operational and maintenance facilities, $1,843,000. Ked River Arsenal, Texas: Operational and maintenance facilities, $140,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Research and development facilities and community facilities, $2,865,000. E(.>ck Island Arsenal, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facil­ ities, $347,000. Rossford Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Utilities, $400,000. Savanna Ordnance Depot, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facilities, $342,000. Seneca Ordnance Depot, New York: Community facilities, $129,000.
    [Show full text]
  • 05-20-08 Clmplan.Pmd
    CCCAAARRRTTTEEERRR LLLAAAKKKEEE WWWaaattteeerrr QQQuuuaaallliiitttyyy MMMaaannnaaagggeeemmmeeennnttt PPPlllaaannn West Pottawattamie Soil and Water Conservation District May 2008 Project Sponsors: City of Carter Lake City of Omaha Prepared by: Carter Lake Environmental Assessment and Rehabilitation (CLEAR) Council The Vision…. “Carter Lake will be the crown jewel of the metropolitan area by being a stable, healthy ecosystem that provides for multi use recreational activities and economic opportunities.” A Community-Based Water Quality Management Plan for Carter Lake Watershed Project Sponsors City of Carter Lake, Iowa City of Omaha Russ Kramer, Mayor Mike Fahey, Mayor Technical Advisory Team City of Carter Lake, Iowa Iowa State University in West Pottawattamie County Ron Rothmeyer Brad Richardson City of Omaha Nebraska Department of Natural Resources Pat Slaven Steve Gaul Harald Flatoen Josh Lear Iowa Department of Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension Mike McGhee in Douglas/Sarpy Counties Chris Larson Steve Tonn Bryan Hayes USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality Dale Duval Paul Brakhage Pat O’Brien Carter Lake Preservation Society Deana Barger Jeanne Eibes Terry Hickman Jan Petersen Joan Harder Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Mark Porath West Pottawattamie County Soil & Water Conservation District Metropolitan Area Planning Agency Kevin Seevers Paul Mullen Lynn Dittmer Iowa Division of Soil Conservation Bob Waters Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Creighton's Campus for Residence Hall Move in from the East: Follow I-80 West Across the Missouri River to I-480
    Directions to Creighton’s Campus for Residence Hall Move In From the East: Follow I-80 West across the Missouri River to I-480/Highway 75 (north). Take exit onto North I-480/Highway 75, then exit at the Harney St./Dodge St. exit. Drive straight until Dodge Street and take a left. Get in the far right lane, turning right on 30th Street, right after the BP gas station. Continue on 30th Street toward Creighton Medical Center. Turn right onto Burt Street (following the sign to Creighton University). Continue on Burt Street and look for signs and people directing you to your hall. From the West: Follow I-80 East to the I-480 (Downtown) exit. Once on I-480/Highway 75, take the Harney St./Dodge St. exit. Drive straight until Dodge Street and take a left. Get in the far right lane, turning right on 30th Street, right after the BP gas station. Continue on 30th Street toward Creighton Medical Center. Turn right onto Burt Street (following the sign to Creighton University). Continue on Burt Street and look for signs and people directing you to your hall. From the North: Follow I-29 South to I-480 West, exit 53B. Follow I-480 across the Missouri River into Omaha, (Do not take the 14th St. exit) and exit on 30th Street, Exit 2B. Turn right on 30th Street, heading towards Creighton Medical Center. Turn right onto Burt Street (following the sign to Creighton University). Continue on Burt Street and look for signs and people directing you to your hall.
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Enlisted Personnel Policy 1907-1956
    FOUNDATION of the FORCE Air Force Enlisted Personnel Policy 1907-1956 Mark R. Grandstaff DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited AIR PROGRAM 1997 20050429 034 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Grandstaff, Mark R. Foundation of the Force: Air Force enlisted personnel policy, 1907-1956 / Mark R. Grandstaff. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. United States. Air Force-Non-commissioned officers-History. 2. United States. Air Force-Personnel management-History. I. Title. UG823.G75 1996 96-33468 358.4'1338'0973-DC20 CIP For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN 0-16-049041-3 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEFomApve OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information Is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of Information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Update July 2013
    LAST UPDATE JULY 2013 Acknowledgements The preparation of this document was financed in part by a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (Project No: 3-27-0000-07-10), with the financial support of the MnDOT Office of Aeronautics. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or the policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report does not in any way constitute a commitment to fund the development depicted herin. Document prepared by MnDOT Office of Aeronautics and HNTB Corporation. MINNESOTA GO STATE AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction and System Goals 1 Chapter 2: Inventory 29 Chapter 3: Forecast 43 Chapter 4: Airline Service 63 Chapter 5: Airport Facility Requirements 75 Chapter 6: Performance Report 97 Chapter 7: Investment Plan and System Recommendations 161 Chapter 8: A Future Vision of Aviation 195 AppendicesAppendices 217 215 APPENDICIES This page intentionally left blank. MINNESOTA GO STATE AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN Appendices APPENDIX A: ACRONYMS APPENDIX B: INVENTORY SURVEY APPENDIX C: FORECAST TECHNICAL REPORT APPENDIX D: COMMERCIAL AIR SERVICE TECHNICAL REPORT APPENDIX E: AIRPORT FACILITY NEEDS SHEETS AND REPORT CARDS APPENDIX F: UNIT COST ASSUMPTIONS APPENDIX G: GOALS MATRIX APPENDICES PAGE 215 This page intentionally left blank. PAGE 216 MINNESOTA GO STATE AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN AC Advisory Circular ADA Americans with Disabilities Act ADPM Average Day Peak Month AIP Airport Improvement Program ALP Airport Layout Plan ALSF High Intensity Approach Lighting System with Sequenced Flashers
    [Show full text]
  • To Download April 21-May 5
    [email protected] • April 21-May 5, 2021 • mulletwrapper.com • 850-492-5221 Local playwright Laura Pfizenmayer’s autobiographical cancer survivor dramedy opens April 30 at SBCT Local playwright Laura Pfizenmayer (front) and the cast from the South Baldwin Community Theater production of “Cancer Can Kiss My A$$” run a rehearsal for the plays world premier at SBCT on April 30 at 7:30 p.m. The dramedy chronicles the journey of Jean’s battle and triumph over anal cancer and is based on Laura’s own story. Its six runs also include 7:30 shows on May 1, 7 & 8 and 2:30 p.m. matinees on May 2 and 9. For tickets and more info, visit sbct.biz for tickets and more information. “During lockdown I wrote a dramadey recounting my own cancer journey and now South Baldwin is giving it a world premiere,’’ Laura said. “The theatre is thrilled to be welcoming back our patrons while still observing all COVID guidelines.’’ Directed by Jan Hinnen, the cast includes Ann Gaynor, Mel Middlebrooks, Barbara Campbell, Steve Henry, Rio Cordy and Robert Gardner. (Photo by Dan Mennuto) Page 2 • The Mullet Wrapper • April 21-May 5, 2021 • Ad. Info: 850-492-5221 • SHARE YOUR COMMUNITY NEWS• E-Mail: [email protected] A Bill McGinnes owned local institution for 36 years ZZA OUSY PI EER & L WARM B HOME OF THE WHO’S YOUR DADDY BURGER LIVE MUSIC NIGHTLY HAPPY HOUR 11-7 NEVER A COVER MON, TUE, WED & THURS MON-FRI Smokey Otis & Mark Laborde MAY 7-8 & 21-22 Bo Grant FULL MENU (formerly of The Platters) MAY 1: Tim Roberts ‘TIL MIDNIGHT MAY 14: Tim Robinson MAY 29: Delta Donnie Ad.
    [Show full text]
  • Sky and Telescope
    SkyandTelescope.com The Lunar 100 By Charles A. Wood Just about every telescope user is familiar with French comet hunter Charles Messier's catalog of fuzzy objects. Messier's 18th-century listing of 109 galaxies, clusters, and nebulae contains some of the largest, brightest, and most visually interesting deep-sky treasures visible from the Northern Hemisphere. Little wonder that observing all the M objects is regarded as a virtual rite of passage for amateur astronomers. But the night sky offers an object that is larger, brighter, and more visually captivating than anything on Messier's list: the Moon. Yet many backyard astronomers never go beyond the astro-tourist stage to acquire the knowledge and understanding necessary to really appreciate what they're looking at, and how magnificent and amazing it truly is. Perhaps this is because after they identify a few of the Moon's most conspicuous features, many amateurs don't know where Many Lunar 100 selections are plainly visible in this image of the full Moon, while others require to look next. a more detailed view, different illumination, or favorable libration. North is up. S&T: Gary The Lunar 100 list is an attempt to provide Moon lovers with Seronik something akin to what deep-sky observers enjoy with the Messier catalog: a selection of telescopic sights to ignite interest and enhance understanding. Presented here is a selection of the Moon's 100 most interesting regions, craters, basins, mountains, rilles, and domes. I challenge observers to find and observe them all and, more important, to consider what each feature tells us about lunar and Earth history.
    [Show full text]
  • AS of SEPTEMBER 02, 2021 Principal and L
    CLERK OF THE LEGISLATURE'S OFFICE PRINCIPALS AND REGISTERED LOBBYISTS CURRENT SESSION - AS OF SEPTEMBER 24, 2021 Principal and Lobbyist WD Address Phone 3M COMPANY 225-4N-14, St. Paul, MN 55144-100 (651)503-4554 Bromm Nielsen & Mines 635 S 14th Suite 315, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)327-1603 AAA Nebraska and The Auto Club Group 910 N. 96th Street, Omaha, NE 68114 (402)938-3806 Faustman, Nicholas 910 N. 96th Street, Omaha, NE 68114 (402)938-3806 AARP Nebraska 301 S. 13th Street Suite 201, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)323-5421 American Communications Group, Inc. 1141 H Street, Suite B, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)475-0727 Decamp, Suzan 301 South 13th Street, Suite 201, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)323-5424 DeLong, Danny 301 S. 13th Street, Suite 201, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)323-5424 Holmquist, David 301 S. 13th Street, Suite 201, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)323-5424 Lassen, Robert 301 S. 13th Street, Suite 201, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)323-5424 Nathan, Robbie 301 S. 13th Street, Suite 201, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)323-5424 Potter, Tim 301 South 13th Street, Suite 201, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)323-5424 Ragland, Jina 301 S. 13th St. Ste. 201, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)323-2524 Stubbendieck, Todd 301 S. 13th Street Suite 201, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)323-5421 Ward, Kathryn 301 S. 13th Street, Suite 201, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)323-5424 ABATE of Nebraska, Inc. PO Box 22764, Lincoln, NE 68542-2764 (402)489-0651 Jensen Rogert Associates, Inc. 625 S. 14th Street, Suite A, Lincoln, NE 68508 (402)436-2165 Accel Entertainment, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Programs Issue 2018 Flyer Daedalian Flying Training
    Daedalus Programs Issue 2018 Flyer Daedalian Flying Training Educ & Trng Awards Veterans Day JROTC Awards Service Awards ROTC Scholarships Aviation Awards Air Camp Community Support First to fly in time of war The premier fraternity of military aviators CONTENTS December 2018, Vol. LIX No. 4 Departments Programs 5 8 30-31 Reunions Objectives & Programs Service Awards 6 10 32-33 Commander’s Perspective Meet the Program Manager Mentoring Program 7 11 34-35 Executive Director Top 10 Benefits of Membership Virtual Flight 14 12-13 36-37 New/Rejoining Daedalians A Daedalian History Lesson A Tribute to Les Leavoy 16-17 15 38-39 Book Reviews Education & Training Awards Air Camp 23 19 40-41 In Memoriam Sustained Giving JROTC Awards 42-44 20-21 Awards Community Support Extras 18 45-63 22 Advice for Future Aviators Flightline National Flight Academy 64 65 24-25 A Young Boy’s Wisdom Flight Contacts Scholarships 66-67 26-27 Eagle Wing DFT 28-29 Educate Americans THE ORDER OF DAEDALIANS was organized on March 26, 1934, by a representative group of American World War I pilots to perpetuate the spirit of pa- triotism, the love of country, and the high ideals of sacrifice which place service to nation above personal safety or position. The Order is dedicated to: insuring that America will always be preeminent in air and space—the encouragement of flight safety—fostering an esprit de corps in the military air forces—promoting the adoption of military service as a career—and aiding deserving young individuals in specialized higher education through the establishment of scholarships.
    [Show full text]