Engineering Bispecific Antibodies for Targeted Delivery of Cytotoxin- Loaded Nanoparticles to Tumour Cells

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Engineering Bispecific Antibodies for Targeted Delivery of Cytotoxin- Loaded Nanoparticles to Tumour Cells Engineering bispecific antibodies for targeted delivery of cytotoxin- loaded nanoparticles to tumour cells by Karin Taylor Bachelor of Science (Genetics) Bachelor of Science Honours (Genetics) Graduate Certificate in Business A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN) Abstract First-line cancer treatments, such as surgical removal of tumours, are necessary but highly invasive and can only be of therapeutic benefit if the cancer has not yet spread to other organs. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy can help to slow the spread of cancer, but the systemic exposure leads to cumulative and cytotoxic effects, which leave the patient immune-compromised and susceptible to organ failure. This highlights the need to develop targeted therapies capable of delivering such drugs directly to the cancer cells, to overcome drug resistance and limit the cytotoxic effects associated with chemotherapeutics. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) provide a means to target conjugated drugs or radio-labels while also having therapeutic benefits in their own right. Cancer cells are often characterised by the overexpression of particular cell surface biomarkers, and these biomarkers make ideal targets for delivery of drugs via specific mAbs. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a validated cell surface antigen that has been extensively evaluated in the literature. EGFR is associated with a number of different cancers including breast and colon, and anti-EGFR mAbs are approved for therapeutic use (e.g. panitumumab and cetuximab). Drug-conjugated anti-EGFR mAbs are also under pre- clinical and clinical evaluation. However significant challenges remain, as some cancers are refractive to mAb therapy due to pre-existing and acquired resistance to a given treatment, both mAb and drug related. The drug dosage carried by conjugated antibodies is limited to the number of molecules that can be attached to the antibody without compromising the antibody’s binding affinity. Another novel approach lies in the development of nanoparticles capable of carrying a high therapeutic payload, including cytotoxins, DNA, siRNA or other therapeutic agents. Inclusion of a targeting system on such drug delivery vehicles provides a means to deliver concentrated doses directly to sites of interest while simultaneously protecting the payload from the environment and vice versa. The EnGeneIC drug delivery vehicle (EDVTMnanocell) is a novel 400 nm anucleate bacterial nanoparticle, which can be loaded with high concentrations of various drugs and utilises bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) as a targeting moiety. These BsAbs bind both the EDVTMnanocell and the cancer cell biomarker. Initial clinical testing of the BsAb-EDVTMnanocell system has been shown to exhibit promising outcomes in vitro and in initial clinical trials. In preliminary studies, i EDVTMnanocells were targeted to EGFR-expressing cells utilising a BsAb produced by linking two separate mAbs via Protein A/G. However, problems were identified relating to product uniformity, with a propensity for forming cross-linked aggregates impacting the ability to produce these BsAb preparations economically. In this project we have created engineered BsAbs to facilitate the targeting of EDVTMnanocells directly to a cancer cell surface antigen, EGFR, allowing improved product quality and consistency. We have engineered a number of BsAb formats for production in the CHO-S expression system, and investigated their ability to bind to the EDVTMnanocell and subsequently facilitate targeting. We have related changes in BsAb structure to final BsAb product yield, stability and ability to bind recombinant and native targets in vitro and in vivo following purification by chromatography techniques. While all formats were capable of EDVTMnanocell targeting, differences in product yield and stability were observed. Development of processes to produce high levels of BsAbs have proved to be more complicated than standard production techniques required for mAb development owing to the lower expression levels of BsAbs and their inherent downstream instability. Slight modifications of the BsAb amino acid sequence resulted in two similar constructs showing a 6-fold difference in product yield. However, the same changes in sequence resulted in improved downstream and long-term stability of the product, strengthening the need to develop optimal systems for BsAb production. Surface Plasmon Resonance analyses showed that these engineered BsAbs retain high binding affinities for EGFR comparable to the parent mAb. Furthermore, BsAbs are able to bind EGFR-overexpressing MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells both independently and while bound to EDVTMnanocells. Selection of an engineered BsAb that has shown optimal value in the ability to consistently produce a uniform, predictable amount of BsAb has enabled further in vivo product characterisation. Tumour regression data produced with our research partners EnGeneIC has shown that in Balb/C athymic nude mouse xenograft models, doxorubicin-loaded EDVTMnanocells with bound BsAbs have a positive effect on tumour regression. The optimised format selected by EnGeneIC has now enabled the commencement of scale-up BsAb production for use in a Phase IIa clinical trial. The modular design of the BsAb optimised during this work allows the substitution of the EGFR targeting domain for other specificities. As such, this design is now being ii investigated by other members of our laboratory for the targeting of EDVTMnanocells to other cancer cell biomarkers such as mesothelin and c-kit. This allows the EDVTMnanocell to be tailored to particular cancer types, leading to a personalised medicine approach for the patient. iii Declaration by author This thesis is composed of my original work, and contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference has been made in the text. I have clearly stated the contribution by others to jointly-authored works that I have included in my thesis. I have clearly stated the contribution of others to my thesis as a whole, including statistical assistance, survey design, data analysis, significant technical procedures, professional editorial advice, and any other original research work used or reported in my thesis. The content of my thesis is the result of work I have carried out since the commencement of my research higher degree candidature and does not include a substantial part of work that has been submitted to qualify for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution. I have clearly stated which parts of my thesis, if any, have been submitted to qualify for another award. I acknowledge that an electronic copy of my thesis must be lodged with the University Library and, subject to the policy and procedures of The University of Queensland, the thesis be made available for research and study in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 unless a period of embargo has been approved by the Dean of the Graduate School. I acknowledge that copyright of all material contained in my thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of that material. Where appropriate I have obtained copyright permission from the copyright holder to reproduce material in this thesis. iv Publications during candidature Peer-reviewed journal papers K. Taylor, C. B. Howard, M. L. Jones, I. Sedliarou, H. Brahmbhatt, J. A. MacDiarmid ,T. P. Munro and S. M. Mahler. Nanocell targeting using engineered bispecific antibodies. mAbs 2015; 7:53-65. DOI: 10.4161/19420862.2014.985952. 2013 Impact Factor: 4.726 Oral conference presentations K. Taylor, C. B. Howard, M. L. Jones, I. Sedliarou, S. M. Mahler and T. P. Munro. Bispecific Antibody Production: Addressing problems with stability. Annual Bio Processing Network (BPN) Conference, Gold Coast, Australia. October 2013. K. Taylor, C. B. Howard, M. L. Jones, I. Sedliarou, S. M. Mahler and T. P. Munro. Next generation bispecific antibody design and the influence thereof on product yield and stability. The 23rd European Society for Animal Cell Technology (ESACT), Lille, France. June 2013 Poster conference presentations K. Taylor, C. B. Howard, M. L. Jones, I. Sedliarou, S. M. Mahler and T. P. Munro. Engineering bispecific antibodies and the implications of design on expression levels, stability and binding of targets. Poster presentation delivered at the 9th Annual Essential Protein Engineering Summit (PEGS), Boston, MA, USA. May 2013. K. Taylor, C. B. Howard, M. L. Jones, S. M. Mahler and T. P. Munro. Development and characterisation of bispecific antibodies. Poster presentation delivered at the IMB Student Symposium, Brisbane, Australia. November 2012. K. Taylor, C. B. Howard, M. L. Jones, S. M. Mahler and T. P. Munro. Development and characterisation of bispecific antibodies. Poster presentation delivered at the International Conference on BioNano Innovation (ICBNI), Brisbane, Australia. July 2012. v Publications included in this thesis Peer-reviewed journal papers K. Taylor, C. B. Howard, M. L. Jones, I. Sedliarou, H. Brahmbhatt, J. A. MacDiarmid ,T. P. Munro and S. M. Mahler. Nanocell targeting using engineered bispecific antibodies. mAbs 2015; 7:53-65. DOI: 10.4161/19420862.2014.985952. 2013 Impact Factor: 4.726 • Incorporated as part of Chapters 2, 3, 4 and 5 Contributor Statement of contribution K. Taylor (Candidate) Designed experiments (80%), wrote and edited the paper (80%) and completed
Recommended publications
  • Affibody Molecules for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Targeting
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine, published on January 21, 2009 as doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.055525 Affibody Molecules for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Targeting In Vivo: Aspects of Dimerization and Labeling Chemistry Vladimir Tolmachev1-3, Mikaela Friedman4, Mattias Sandstrom¨ 5, Tove L.J. Eriksson2, Daniel Rosik2, Monika Hodik1, Stefan Sta˚hl4, Fredrik Y. Frejd1,2, and Anna Orlova1,2 1Unit of Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 2Affibody AB, Bromma, Sweden; 3Department of Medical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 4Division of Molecular Biotechnology, School of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden; and 5Section of Hospital Physics, Department of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden Noninvasive detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in malignant tumors by radionuclide molecu- he epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; other lar imaging may provide diagnostic information influencing pa- T designations are HER1 and ErbB-1) is a transmembrane tient management. The aim of this study was to evaluate a tyrosine kinase receptor that regulates cell proliferation, novel EGFR-targeting protein, the ZEGFR:1907 Affibody molecule, for radionuclide imaging of EGFR expression, to determine a motility, and suppression of apoptosis (1). Overexpression suitable tracer format (dimer or monomer) and optimal label. of EGFR is documented in several malignant tumors, such Methods: An EGFR-specific Affibody molecule, ZEGFR:1907, as carcinomas of the breast, urinary bladder, and lung, and 111 and its dimeric form, (ZEGFR:1907)2, were labeled with In using is associated with poor prognosis (2). A high level of EGFR 125 benzyl-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid and with I using expression could provide malignant cells with an advantage p-iodobenzoate.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Presentation
    Technology presentation | July 2021 Fc Engineering Platform For Next Generation Therapeutic Antibodies. Property of Clayton Biotechnologies, Inc. | All rights reserved www.claytonbiotech.com Clayton Biotechnologies, Inc. www.claytonbiotech.com Page 1 Clayton Biotechnologies, Inc. is a for-profit company which facilitates the commercialization of medical discoveries made by the Clayton Foundation for Research and its supporting entities. The Clayton Foundation for Research is a nonprofit medical research organization in Houston, Texas established in 1933 by Benjamin Clayton. The two-fold mission of The Foundation is to: Ø Conduct medical research for the purpose of discovering the cause, prevention and cure of diseases for the benefit of mankind. Ø Transfer the resulting medical research discoveries from the laboratory to the use of the general public by patenting and licensing such technology for development into drugs or other products. Clayton Biotechnologies, Inc. www.claytonbiotech.com Page 2 Contents. Research at leading institutions 04 Fc Engineered Aglycosylated Antibodies. 05 Targeted therapy 06 Fc engineered antibodies 08 Signal in various immune cells 10 Platform for engineering 13 Collection of Fc Domains 14 Antibodies with exquisite affinity 18 Cytotoxic Domain – Fc1004 19 Dendritic Cell Activating Domains 27 Complement Activation Domains: Fc801, 802, 805 29 RA801 – Rituximab 32 Competition 34 Summary 35 Clayton Biotechnologies, Inc. www.claytonbiotech.com Page 3 Medical Research at Leading Research Institutions. United States of America Switzerland UCI University of Geneva Medical research for the purpose of UCSD discovering the cause, prevention and cure of diseases for the benefit of mankind. UT-Southwestern SALK UT-Austin MD Anderson UTHSC UT-Medical Branch San Antonio Baylor College of Medicine Clayton Biotechnologies, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive QSAR Tools to Aid in Early Process Development of Monoclonal Antibodies
    Predictive QSAR tools to aid in early process development of monoclonal antibodies John Micael Andreas Karlberg Published work submitted to Newcastle University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Engineering November 2019 Abstract Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become one of the fastest growing markets for diagnostic and therapeutic treatments over the last 30 years with a global sales revenue around $89 billion reported in 2017. A popular framework widely used in pharmaceutical industries for designing manufacturing processes for mAbs is Quality by Design (QbD) due to providing a structured and systematic approach in investigation and screening process parameters that might influence the product quality. However, due to the large number of product quality attributes (CQAs) and process parameters that exist in an mAb process platform, extensive investigation is needed to characterise their impact on the product quality which makes the process development costly and time consuming. There is thus an urgent need for methods and tools that can be used for early risk-based selection of critical product properties and process factors to reduce the number of potential factors that have to be investigated, thereby aiding in speeding up the process development and reduce costs. In this study, a framework for predictive model development based on Quantitative Structure- Activity Relationship (QSAR) modelling was developed to link structural features and properties of mAbs to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) retention times and expressed mAb yield from HEK cells. Model development was based on a structured approach for incremental model refinement and evaluation that aided in increasing model performance until becoming acceptable in accordance to the OECD guidelines for QSAR models.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination Therapies with Anti-Cd38 Antibodies Kombinationstherapien Mit Anti-Cd38-Antikörpern Polythérapies Avec Des Anticorps Anti-Cd38
    (19) TZZ¥__Z¥_T (11) EP 3 110 843 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A61K 31/4745 (2006.01) A61K 39/395 (2006.01) 11.09.2019 Bulletin 2019/37 A61K 31/573 (2006.01) A61K 31/65 (2006.01) A61K 31/675 (2006.01) A61P 35/00 (2006.01) (2006.01) (21) Application number: 15755187.0 A61P 35/02 (22) Date of filing: 25.02.2015 (86) International application number: PCT/US2015/017420 (87) International publication number: WO 2015/130728 (03.09.2015 Gazette 2015/35) (54) COMBINATION THERAPIES WITH ANTI-CD38 ANTIBODIES KOMBINATIONSTHERAPIEN MIT ANTI-CD38-ANTIKÖRPERN POLYTHÉRAPIES AVEC DES ANTICORPS ANTI-CD38 (84) Designated Contracting States: US-A1- 2012 231 008 US-A1- 2013 109 593 AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO • SATHISH GOPALAKRISHNAN ET AL: PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR "Daratumumabimproves the anti-myeloma effect Designated Extension States: of newly emerging multidrug therapies", BLOOD BA ME AND LYMPHATIC CANCER: TARGETS AND THERAPY, DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD, GB, vol. (30) Priority: 28.02.2014 US 201461946002 P 2013, no. 3, 18 April 2013 (2013-04-18), pages 02.06.2014 US 201462006386 P 19-24, XP002735277, ISSN: 1179-9889, DOI: 10.2147/BLCTT.S29567 (43) Date of publication of application: • RICHARDSON P ET AL: "Daratumumab. 04.01.2017 Bulletin 2017/01 Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, treatment of multiple myeloma", DRUGS OF THE FUTURE, (73) Proprietor: Janssen Biotech, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • New Biological Therapies: Introduction to the Basis of the Risk of Infection
    New biological therapies: introduction to the basis of the risk of infection Mario FERNÁNDEZ RUIZ, MD, PhD Unit of Infectious Diseases Hospital Universitario “12 de Octubre”, Madrid ESCMIDInstituto de Investigación eLibraryHospital “12 de Octubre” (i+12) © by author Transparency Declaration Over the last 24 months I have received honoraria for talks on behalf of • Astellas Pharma • Gillead Sciences • Roche • Sanofi • Qiagen Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Paul Ehrlich (1854-1915) • “side-chain” theory (1897) • receptor-ligand concept (1900) • “magic bullet” theory • foundation for specific chemotherapy (1906) • Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine (1908) (together with Metchnikoff) Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author 1981: B-1 antibody (tositumomab) anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody 1997: FDA approval of rituximab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD20-positive NHL 2001: FDA approval of imatinib for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Functional classification of targeted (biological) agents • Agents targeting soluble immune effector molecules • Agents targeting cell surface receptors
    [Show full text]
  • Biomolecules
    biomolecules Review Reprogramming the Constant Region of Immunoglobulin G Subclasses for Enhanced Therapeutic Potency against Cancer Tae Hyun Kang 1 and Sang Taek Jung 2,* 1 Biopharmaceutical Chemistry Major, School of Applied Chemistry, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-2286-1422 Received: 26 December 2019; Accepted: 24 February 2020; Published: 1 March 2020 Abstract: The constant region of immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies is responsible for their effector immune mechanism and prolongs serum half-life, while the fragment variable (Fv) region is responsible for cellular or tissue targeting. Therefore, antibody engineering for cancer therapeutics focuses on both functional efficacy of the constant region and tissue- or cell-specificity of the Fv region. In the functional aspect of therapeutic purposes, antibody engineers in both academia and industry have capitalized on the constant region of different IgG subclasses and engineered the constant region to enhance therapeutic efficacy against cancer, leading to a number of successes for cancer patients in clinical settings. In this article, we review IgG subclasses for cancer therapeutics, including (i) IgG1, (ii) IgG2, 3, and 4, (iii) recent findings on Fc receptor functions, and (iv) future directions of reprogramming the constant region of IgG to maximize the efficacy of antibody drug molecules in cancer patients. Keywords: immunoglobulin G; therapeutic antibodies; Fc receptors; cancer therapy 1. Introduction Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) comprised more than 70% of global biologics revenue in 2018 [1]. Up to 21 January 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved 74 therapeutic antibodies, 29 of which were for cancer-related disease (39%) (Figure1a).
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Decisions Taken by the Harmonized System Committee from the 47Th to 60Th Sessions (2011
    CLASSIFICATION DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE HARMONIZED SYSTEM COMMITTEE FROM THE 47TH TO 60TH SESSIONS (2011 - 2018) WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION Rue du Marché 30 B-1210 Brussels Belgium November 2011 Copyright © 2011 World Customs Organization. All rights reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning translation, reproduction and adaptation rights should be addressed to [email protected]. D/2011/0448/25 The following list contains the classification decisions (other than those subject to a reservation) taken by the Harmonized System Committee ( 47th Session – March 2011) on specific products, together with their related Harmonized System code numbers and, in certain cases, the classification rationale. Advice Parties seeking to import or export merchandise covered by a decision are advised to verify the implementation of the decision by the importing or exporting country, as the case may be. HS codes Classification No Product description Classification considered rationale 1. Preparation, in the form of a powder, consisting of 92 % sugar, 6 % 2106.90 GRIs 1 and 6 black currant powder, anticaking agent, citric acid and black currant flavouring, put up for retail sale in 32-gram sachets, intended to be consumed as a beverage after mixing with hot water. 2. Vanutide cridificar (INN List 100). 3002.20 3. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29 (See “INN List 101” at the end of this publication.) and 30 4. Certain INN products. Chapters 13, 29 (See “INN List 102” at the end of this publication.) and 30 5. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29, (See “INN List 103” at the end of this publication.) 30, 35 and 39 6. Re-classification of INN products.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanibirumab (CUI C3490677) Add to Cart
    5/17/2018 NCI Metathesaurus Contains Exact Match Begins With Name Code Property Relationship Source ALL Advanced Search NCIm Version: 201706 Version 2.8 (using LexEVS 6.5) Home | NCIt Hierarchy | Sources | Help Suggest changes to this concept Tanibirumab (CUI C3490677) Add to Cart Table of Contents Terms & Properties Synonym Details Relationships By Source Terms & Properties Concept Unique Identifier (CUI): C3490677 NCI Thesaurus Code: C102877 (see NCI Thesaurus info) Semantic Type: Immunologic Factor Semantic Type: Amino Acid, Peptide, or Protein Semantic Type: Pharmacologic Substance NCIt Definition: A fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), with potential antiangiogenic activity. Upon administration, tanibirumab specifically binds to VEGFR2, thereby preventing the binding of its ligand VEGF. This may result in the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and a decrease in tumor nutrient supply. VEGFR2 is a pro-angiogenic growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase expressed by endothelial cells, while VEGF is overexpressed in many tumors and is correlated to tumor progression. PDQ Definition: A fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), with potential antiangiogenic activity. Upon administration, tanibirumab specifically binds to VEGFR2, thereby preventing the binding of its ligand VEGF. This may result in the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and a decrease in tumor nutrient supply. VEGFR2 is a pro-angiogenic growth factor receptor
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies and Challenges for the Next Generation of Therapeutic Antibodies
    FOCUS ON THERAPEUTIC ANTIBODIES PERSPECTIVES ‘validated targets’, either because prior anti- TIMELINE bodies have clearly shown proof of activity in humans (first-generation approved anti- Strategies and challenges for the bodies on the market for clinically validated targets) or because a vast literature exists next generation of therapeutic on the importance of these targets for the disease mechanism in both in vitro and in vivo pharmacological models (experi- antibodies mental validation; although this does not necessarily equate to clinical validation). Alain Beck, Thierry Wurch, Christian Bailly and Nathalie Corvaia Basically, the strategy consists of develop- ing new generations of antibodies specific Abstract | Antibodies and related products are the fastest growing class of for the same antigens but targeting other therapeutic agents. By analysing the regulatory approvals of IgG-based epitopes and/or triggering different mecha- biotherapeutic agents in the past 10 years, we can gain insights into the successful nisms of action (second- or third-generation strategies used by pharmaceutical companies so far to bring innovative drugs to antibodies, as discussed below) or even the market. Many challenges will have to be faced in the next decade to bring specific for the same epitopes but with only one improved property (‘me better’ antibod- more efficient and affordable antibody-based drugs to the clinic. Here, we ies). This validated approach has a high discuss strategies to select the best therapeutic antigen targets, to optimize the probability of success, but there are many structure of IgG antibodies and to design related or new structures with groups working on this class of target pro- additional functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Article in Press
    G Model MIMM-4561; No. of Pages 12 ARTICLE IN PRESS Molecular Immunology xxx (2015) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Immunology j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/molimm Review Alternative molecular formats and therapeutic applications for ଝ bispecific antibodies ∗ Christoph Spiess, Qianting Zhai, Paul J. Carter Department of Antibody Engineering, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Bispecific antibodies are on the cusp of coming of age as therapeutics more than half a century after they Received 28 November 2014 ® were first described. Two bispecific antibodies, catumaxomab (Removab , anti-EpCAM × anti-CD3) and Received in revised form ® blinatumomab (Blincyto , anti-CD19 × anti-CD3) are approved for therapy, and >30 additional bispecific 30 December 2014 antibodies are currently in clinical development. Many of these investigational bispecific antibody drugs Accepted 2 January 2015 are designed to retarget T cells to kill tumor cells, whereas most others are intended to interact with two Available online xxx different disease mediators such as cell surface receptors, soluble ligands and other proteins. The modular architecture of antibodies has been exploited to create more than 60 different bispecific antibody formats. Keywords: These formats vary in many ways including their molecular weight, number of antigen-binding sites, Bispecific antibodies spatial relationship between different binding sites, valency for each antigen, ability to support secondary Antibody engineering Antibody therapeutics immune functions and pharmacokinetic half-life. These diverse formats provide great opportunity to tailor the design of bispecific antibodies to match the proposed mechanisms of action and the intended clinical application.
    [Show full text]
  • EURL ECVAM Recommendation on Non-Animal-Derived Antibodies
    EURL ECVAM Recommendation on Non-Animal-Derived Antibodies EUR 30185 EN Joint Research Centre This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. For information on the methodology and quality underlying the data used in this publication for which the source is neither Eurostat nor other Commission services, users should contact the referenced source. EURL ECVAM Recommendations The aim of a EURL ECVAM Recommendation is to provide the views of the EU Reference Laboratory for alternatives to animal testing (EURL ECVAM) on the scientific validity of alternative test methods, to advise on possible applications and implications, and to suggest follow-up activities to promote alternative methods and address knowledge gaps. During the development of its Recommendation, EURL ECVAM typically mandates the EURL ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee (ESAC) to carry out an independent scientific peer review which is communicated as an ESAC Opinion and Working Group report. In addition, EURL ECVAM consults with other Commission services, EURL ECVAM’s advisory body for Preliminary Assessment of Regulatory Relevance (PARERE), the EURL ECVAM Stakeholder Forum (ESTAF) and with partner organisations of the International Collaboration on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM). Contact information European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Chemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit (F3) Address: via E.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Key Feature Comparison
    Affimer® non-Antibody Binders for Affinity Applications: Introduction and Key Feature Comparison Affimer® non-Antibody Binders for Affinity Applications: Introduction and Key Feature Comparison 1 Contents Abstract Introduction Affinity-based applications in the detection, analysis and manipulation of protein targets In vitro applications Diagnostic applications Therapeutic applications Antibodies and their limitations as affinity binders Production considerations: ease, speed, cost and process control Size and structural complexity Stability under assay conditions Immobilisation onto solid support Success rate Limitations of antibodies as biosensors – stability, size and orientation Limitations of antibodies as therapeutics – immunogenicity, toxicity and 3D structure recognition Antibody engineering: future directions Alternatives to antibodies Engineered antibody fragments Aptamers Aptamer engineering – future enhancements Non-antibody protein scaffolds Affimer binders: what’s different? Affimer binders can be generated to almost any protein target, and show high discriminatory powers In practice: Development of novel Affimer diagnostic reagents for Zika virus outbreak management In practice: Affimer binders can be targeted to extracellular effector domains and allosteric regions of receptor proteins In practice: The ability of Affimer proteins to form multimers and fusion proteins allows fine tuning of therapeutic activity and stability in vivo Conclusion References Affimer® non-Antibody Binders for Affinity Applications: Introduction
    [Show full text]