Ecography ECOG-01369 Cunningham, H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecography ECOG-01369 Cunningham, H Ecography ECOG-01369 Cunningham, H. R., Rissler, L. J., Buckley, L. B. and Urban, M. C. 2015. Abiotic and biotic constraints across reptile and amphibian ranges. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.01369 Supplementary material Appendix 1 TABLE A1 The directional offsets and linear distances between the centroid of the observed and predicted range for all species. The ratio of predicted to actual range area North (Pn) or South (Ps) of the observed geometric centroids is listed for each species. If the ratio of habitat predicted to be suitable in the South and North (Ps/Pn) is greater than one, there is more overprediction in the South. Species with ranges abutting the Gulf of Mexico were excluded from the analysis. 31 Offset Offset Climate Sample Species Class Order Region Vector Distance Ps Pn Ps/Pn Variable of Size (degrees) (km) Importance Anaxyrus Amphibian Anura East 9.61 372.4 0.85 0.79 1.07 2231 16 americanus Lithobates Amphibian Anura East 26.79 329.49 0.35 0.37 0.95 41 1 septentrionalis Lithobates Amphibian Anura East 303.63 2018.7 0.17 0.24 0.72 194 15 sylvaticus Rhinophrynus Amphibian Anura East 261.13 78.85 2.09 1.33 1.57 35 7 dorsalis Anaxyrus boreas Amphibian Anura West 347.46 1616.8 7.21 7 1.03 1036 11 Anaxyrus Amphibian Anura West 168.77 502.33 16.2 5.86 2.76 7 18 californicus Anaxyrus canorus Amphibian Anura West 171.59 290.62 7 13 0.54 64 8 Anaxyrus cognatus Amphibian Anura West 349.05 98.12 0.89 0.98 0.91 577 2 Anaxyrus Amphibian Anura West 319.04 658.3 0.86 1.08 0.79 15 1 hemiophrys Anaxyrus punctatus Amphibian Anura West 176.2 86.71 1.24 1.3 0.95 686 11 Anaxyrus retiformis Amphibian Anura West 190.3 47.18 1.22 1.5 0.81 48 2 Anaxyrus Amphibian Anura West 0.84 228.39 0.72 0.93 0.77 390 3 woodhousii Eleutherodactylidae Amphibian Anura West 169.43 380.19 1.41 1.16 1.21 37 1 augusti Eleutherodactylidae Amphibian Anura West 248.1 109.27 2.54 3 0.85 24 9 marnockii Hyla arenicolor Amphibian Anura West 104.08 64.24 1.3 1.58 0.82 268 2 32 Hyla wrightorum Amphibian Anura West 345.3 141.2 1 2.2 0.45 17 2 Lithobates Amphibian Anura West 188.75 327.78 1.14 1.13 1.02 353 11 berlandieri Lithobates blairi Amphibian Anura West 58.93 117.69 0.7 0.84 0.83 387 6 Lithobates Amphibian Anura West 345.01 380.63 1.67 1.6 1.04 66 2 chiricahuensis Lithobates onca Amphibian Anura West 57.26 150.5 11.5 12 0.96 16 6 Lithobates Amphibian Anura West 146.79 95.09 2.27 2.92 0.78 17 2 tarahumarae Lithobates Amphibian Anura West 335.64 100.19 0.86 0.71 1.21 102 11 yavapaiensis Pseudacris Amphibian Anura West 163.56 216.94 3.38 3.44 0.98 84 18 cadaverina Pseudacris clarkii Amphibian Anura West 246.68 24.48 1.21 0.83 1.45 131 5 Pseudacris regilla Amphibian Anura West 22.4 299.45 1.06 0.68 1.56 805 11 Rana aurora Amphibian Anura West 14.25 133.41 1.29 1.5 0.86 140 11 Rana boylii Amphibian Anura West 3.24 314.08 1.38 1.83 0.76 537 11 Rana luteiventris Amphibian Anura West 349.18 494.68 0.65 0.67 0.97 140 11 Rana muscosa Amphibian Anura West 160.09 208.16 4.17 2.67 1.56 183 4 Rana cascadae Amphibian Anura West 12.48 96.28 1.64 0.94 1.75 83 8 Rana pretiosa Amphibian Anura West 24.65 210.97 1.71 2 0.86 21 8 Smilisca baudinii Amphibian Anura West 241.37 215.19 1.18 1.31 0.9 376 4 33 Spea bombifrons Amphibian Anura West 343.94 226.57 0.62 0.78 0.8 278 6 Spea hammondii Amphibian Anura West 137.18 20.96 2.11 2 1.05 152 1 Spea intermontana Amphibian Anura West 38.79 126.2 0.92 0.96 0.95 211 11 Spea multiplicata Amphibian Anura West 26.71 155.2 0.84 0.81 1.04 298 2 Ambystoma Amphibian Caudata East 324.63 36.07 2.33 2.77 0.84 21 11 annulatum Ambystoma Amphibian Caudata East 262.05 107.67 1.02 0.7 1.45 68 15 jeffersonianum Ambystoma mabeei Amphibian Caudata East 76.14 70.43 1.5 2.62 0.57 23 19 Aneides aeneus Amphibian Caudata East 158.83 31.75 2.15 1.8 1.19 23 15 Cryptobranchus Amphibian Caudata East 31.59 113.28 1.13 1.29 0.88 34 17 alleganiensis Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 155.57 60.87 2.4 2.33 1.03 50 19 aeneus Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 266.27 177.12 11 3.33 3.3 59 6 brimleyorum Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 140.11 461.62 22 85 0.26 10 15 carolinensis Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 226.11 336.59 0.5 0.42 1.19 703 15 fuscus Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 143.48 766.13 49 85 0.58 7 15 imitator 34 Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 238.97 54.92 4.33 5.25 0.83 35 15 marmoratus Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 143.88 19.06 2.39 2 1.19 503 15 monticola Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 18.37 90.23 1.06 1.14 0.93 276 6 ochrophaeus Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 81.81 61.74 2.33 2.17 1.08 38 19 ocoee Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 354.32 17 2.27 2.64 0.86 212 15 quadramaculatus Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 111.87 1168.9 76 78 0.97 11 15 santeetlah Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 189.43 83.7 15.7 15.5 1.01 23 15 welteri Desmognathus Amphibian Caudata East 162.14 189.11 3.8 6.2 0.61 82 15 wright Eurycea bislineata Amphibian Caudata East 12.94 522.85 0.47 0.53 0.89 461 15 Eurycea longicauda Amphibian Caudata East 259.11 27.41 1.06 0.91 1.16 304 17 Eurycea lucifuga Amphibian Caudata East 31.28 98.04 1.27 1.27 1 171 11 Eurycea Amphibian Caudata East 273.53 45.09 3.07 2.93 1.05 73 11 multiplicata Eurycea wilderae Amphibian Caudata East 201.29 161.19 2.89 1.69 1.71 61 15 Gyrinophilua Amphibian Caudata East 33.91 208.01 1.02 1.09 0.93 190 15 porphyriticus 35 Gyrinophilus Amphibian Caudata East 202.37 77.11 16 9.67 1.66 5 15 palleucus Necturus lewisi Amphibian Caudata East 54.66 365.65 10 19 0.53 6 15 Necturus maculosus Amphibian Caudata East 16.19 335.29 0.91 0.7 1.3 107 18 Necturus punctatus Amphibian Caudata East 184.04 43.48 1.2 1.14 1.06 42 19 Plethodon albagula Amphibian Caudata East 357.01 17.93 2.49 1.4 1.78 91 3 Plethodon Amphibian Caudata East 28.2 126.78 4.86 3 1.62 14 6 angusticlavius Plethodon cinereus Amphibian Caudata East 3.23 296.94 0.74 0.65 1.14 546 15 Plethodon Amphibian Caudata East 185.33 130.49 1.71 1.84 0.93 521 15 cylindraceus Plethodon dorsalis Amphibian Caudata East 150.73 56.7 1.54 2.35 0.65 58 17 Plethodon Amphibian Caudata East 202.23 396.51 0.62 0.66 0.94 1049 15 glutinosus Plethodon hoffmani Amphibian Caudata East 151.62 56.76 2.7 5.2 0.52 199 15 Plethodon kentucki Amphibian Caudata East 226.01 127.76 11.5 22.2 0.52 11 15 Plethodon metcalfi Amphibian Caudata East 197.42 70.33 10 9 1.11 32 15 Plethodon Amphibian Caudata East 256.83 114.51 1.92 2.7 0.71 141 15 richmondi 36 Plethodon serratus Amphibian Caudata East 250.41 263.53 1.29 3.81 0.34 206 17 Plethodon Amphibian Caudata East 260.26 56.65 19 10.5 1.81 370 15 teyahalee Plethodon ventralis Amphibian Caudata East 110.07 111.85 30 13 2.31 31 17 Plethodon websteri Amphibian Caudata East 239.55 214.48 8.33 14 0.6 14 6 Ambystoma Amphibian Caudata West 347.42 124.82 5.43 5 1.09 130 11 californiense Ambystoma gracile Amphibian Caudata West 13.36 97.03 0.77 1.12 0.68 71 19 Ambystoma Amphibian Caudata West 337.49 1087.9 14.6 12 1.21 117 11 macrodactylum Aneides ferreus Amphibian Caudata West 2.82 180.97 1.62 1.85 0.88 137 19 Aneides Amphibian Caudata West 337.47 234.92 10.3 11.3 0.91 208 1 flavipunctatus Aneides hardii Amphibian Caudata West 129.9 152.91 5 3.67 1.36 13 11 Aneides lugubris Amphibian Caudata West 319.21 3.84 3.67 2.42 1.52 512 1 Aneides vagrans Amphibian Caudata West 0.81 451.46 9.33 6.75 1.38 103 19 Batrachoseps Amphibian Caudata West 347.2 125.34 2.57 7.5 0.34 193 11 attenuates Batrachoseps Amphibian Caudata West 285.75 67.54 37 23 1.61 71 18 gavilanensis Batrachoseps major Amphibian Caudata West 159.21 239.06 16.5 7 2.36 132 1 37 Batrachoseps Amphibian Caudata West 172.94 186.76 11.7 8.67 1.35 171 18 nigriventris Dicamptodon Amphibian Caudata West 14.79 224.95 5.78 5.75 1 7 8 aterrimus Dicamptodon copei Amphibian Caudata West 141.84 71.44 10.8 19 0.57 9 19 Dicamptodon Amphibian Caudata West 16.61 178.32 1.28 2.06 0.62 230 19 tenebrosus Ensatina Amphibian Caudata West 16.16 239.95 1.41 0.67 2.1 191 11 eschscholtzii Hydromantes Amphibian Caudata West 179.72 477.86 6.4 8.25 0.78 36 8 platycephalus Plethodon dunni Amphibian Caudata West 203.97 40.39 3 1.2 2.5 107 19 Plethodon Amphibian Caudata West 269.67 115.34 1.63 2.06 0.79 52 6 electromorphus Plethodon Amphibian Caudata West 340.02 39.02 7 5.33 1.31 124 19 elongates Plethodon Amphibian Caudata West 31.37 219.01 9.5 10.6 0.9 10 8 idahoensis Plethodon vandykei Amphibian Caudata West 85.25 104.04 24 13 1.85 9 19 Plethodon Amphibian Caudata West 7.92 64.81 1.31 2.33 0.56 135 19 vehiculum Rhyacotriton Amphibian Caudata West 109.29 82.04 3.4 8 0.43 17 11 cascade 38 Rhyacotriton kezeri Amphibian Caudata West 27.22 98.39 4 6 0.67 17 19 Rhyacotriton Amphibian Caudata West 221.94 88.24 2.33 3 0.78 102 19 variegatus Taricha granulosa Amphibian Caudata West 350.04 881.02 1.17 0.65 1.79 394 19 Taricha torosa Amphibian Caudata West 124.01 41.72 5 2.14 2.33 330 18 Eumeces Reptile Squamata East 228.39 114.17 1.59 1.94 0.82 92 17 anthracinus Holbrookia Reptile Squamata East 202.02 202.74 1.58 2.21 0.71 13 6 lacerata Masticophis schotti Reptile Squamata East 236.01 131.1 0.7 0.69 1.01 14 3 Nerodia harteri Reptile Squamata East 215.02 211.49 10.3 12.7 0.82 6 10 Sceloporus virgatus Reptile Squamata East 241.37 215.19 1.18 1.31 0.9 53 2 Sisturus catenatus Reptile Squamata East 74.33 455.15 0.79 1.18 0.67 148 1 Thamnophis Reptile Squamata East 303.16 17.99 13 44 0.3 96 14 brachystoma Thamnophis butleri Reptile Squamata East 281.86 310.56 8.05 9.52 0.85 11 15 Tropidoclonion Reptile Squamata East 140.3 185.32 1.26 1.15 1.09 155 6 lineatum Anniella pulchra Reptile Squamata West 171.08 95.43
Recommended publications
  • Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Vascular Plants, and Habitat in the Gila River Riparian Zone in Southwestern New Mexico
    Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Vascular Plants, and Habitat in the Gila River Riparian Zone in Southwestern New Mexico Kansas Biological Survey Report #151 Kelly Kindscher, Randy Jennings, William Norris, and Roland Shook September 8, 2008 Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Vascular Plants, and Habitat in the Gila River Riparian Zone in Southwestern New Mexico Cover Photo: The Gila River in New Mexico. Photo by Kelly Kindscher, September 2006. Kelly Kindscher, Associate Scientist, Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, 2101 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66047, Email: [email protected] Randy Jennings, Professor, Department of Natural Sciences, Western New Mexico University, PO Box 680, 1000 W. College Ave., Silver City, NM 88062, Email: [email protected] William Norris, Associate Professor, Department of Natural Sciences, Western New Mexico University, PO Box 680, 1000 W. College Ave., Silver City, NM 88062, Email: [email protected] Roland Shook, Emeritus Professor, Biology, Department of Natural Sciences, Western New Mexico University, PO Box 680, 1000 W. College Ave., Silver City, NM 88062, Email: [email protected] Citation: Kindscher, K., R. Jennings, W. Norris, and R. Shook. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Vascular Plants, and Habitat in the Gila River Riparian Zone in Southwestern New Mexico. Open-File Report No. 151. Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, KS. ii + 42 pp. Abstract During 2006 and 2007 our research crews collected data on plants, vegetation, birds, reptiles, and amphibians at 49 sites along the Gila River in southwest New Mexico from upstream of the Gila Cliff Dwellings on the Middle and West Forks of the Gila to sites below the town of Red Rock, New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Xenosaurus Tzacualtipantecus. the Zacualtipán Knob-Scaled Lizard Is Endemic to the Sierra Madre Oriental of Eastern Mexico
    Xenosaurus tzacualtipantecus. The Zacualtipán knob-scaled lizard is endemic to the Sierra Madre Oriental of eastern Mexico. This medium-large lizard (female holotype measures 188 mm in total length) is known only from the vicinity of the type locality in eastern Hidalgo, at an elevation of 1,900 m in pine-oak forest, and a nearby locality at 2,000 m in northern Veracruz (Woolrich- Piña and Smith 2012). Xenosaurus tzacualtipantecus is thought to belong to the northern clade of the genus, which also contains X. newmanorum and X. platyceps (Bhullar 2011). As with its congeners, X. tzacualtipantecus is an inhabitant of crevices in limestone rocks. This species consumes beetles and lepidopteran larvae and gives birth to living young. The habitat of this lizard in the vicinity of the type locality is being deforested, and people in nearby towns have created an open garbage dump in this area. We determined its EVS as 17, in the middle of the high vulnerability category (see text for explanation), and its status by the IUCN and SEMAR- NAT presently are undetermined. This newly described endemic species is one of nine known species in the monogeneric family Xenosauridae, which is endemic to northern Mesoamerica (Mexico from Tamaulipas to Chiapas and into the montane portions of Alta Verapaz, Guatemala). All but one of these nine species is endemic to Mexico. Photo by Christian Berriozabal-Islas. Amphib. Reptile Conserv. | http://redlist-ARC.org 01 June 2013 | Volume 7 | Number 1 | e61 Copyright: © 2013 Wilson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Com- mons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License, which permits unrestricted use for non-com- Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 7(1): 1–47.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnides 76
    Arachnides, 2015, n°76 ARACHNIDES BULLETIN DE TERRARIOPHILIE ET DE RECHERCHES DE L’A.P.C.I. (Association Pour la Connaissance des Invertébrés) 76 2015 0 Arachnides, 2015, n°76 LES PREDATEURS DES SCORPIONS (ARACHNIDA : SCORPIONES) G. DUPRE Dans leur revue sur les prédateurs de scorpions, Polis, Sissom & Mac Cormick (1981) relèvent 150 espèces dont essentiellement des espèces adaptées au comportement nocturne de leur proie (chouettes, rongeurs, carnivores nocturnes) mais également des espèces diurnes (lézards, rongeurs, carnivores....) qui débusquent les scorpions sous les pierres ou dans leurs terriers. Dans une précédente note (Dupré, 2008) nous avions effectué un relevé afin d'actualiser cette étude de 1981. Sept ans après, de nouvelles données sont présentées dans cette synthèse. Voici un nouveau relevé des espèces prédatrices. Nous ne faisons pas mention des scorpions qui feront l'objet d'un futur article traité avec le cannibalisme. Explication des tableaux: La première colonne correspond aux prédateurs, la seconde aux régions concernées et la troisième aux références. Dans la mesure du possible, les noms scientifiques ont été rectifiés en fonction des synonymies ou des nouvelles combinaisons appliquées depuis les dates de publication d'origine. ARTHROPODA ARACHNIDA SOLIFUGAE Solifugae Afrique du Nord Millot & Vachon, 1949; Punzo, 1998; Cloudsley-Thompson, 1977 Eremobates sp. USA Bradley, 1983 ARACHNIDA ARANEAE Acanthoscurria atrox Brésil Lourenço, 1981 Aphonopelma sp. et autres Amérique centrale Mazzotti, 1964 Teraphosidae Phormictopus auratus Cuba Teruel & De Armas, 2012 Brachypelma vagans Mexique Dor et al., 2011 Epicadus heterogaster Brésil Lourenço et al. 2006 Latrodectus sp. USA Baerg, 1961 L. hesperus USA Polis et al., 1981 L. mactans Cuba Teruel, 1996; Teruel & De Armas, 2012 L.
    [Show full text]
  • Watchable Wildlife Form
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Watchable Wildlife Bitter Lake National Wildlife Refuge Welcome Roundnose minnow Dionda episcopa Amphibians Bitter Lake National Wildlife Refuge is one Speckled chub Extrarius aestivalis Family Ambystomatidae – Mole Salamanders of New Mexico’s most important sanctuaries Plains minnow Hybognathus placitus Tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Arkansas River shiner Notropis girardi and breeding grounds for migratory birds and Family Leptodactylidae – Tropical Frogs Rio Grande shiner Notropis jemezanus other wildlife. Established in 1937, the 24,500- Eastern barking frog Eleutherodactylus augusti Pecos bluntnose shiner Notropis simus pecosensis acre refuge is strategically located along the latrans Pecos River where the Chihuahuan Desert Fathead minnow Pimephales promelas Family Pelobatidae – Spadefoot Toads meets the Great Plains. The convergence of Family Catostomidae – Suckers Couch’s spadefoot toad Scaphiopus couchii these vastly different terrains has produced a River carpsucker Carpoides carpio diverse range of habitats, providing a home to New Mexico spadefoot toad Spea multiplicata a rich array of plant and animal life, including Family Ictaluridae – Catfishes Plains spadefoot toad Spea bombifrons Channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus a number of rare species. Family Bufonidae – Toads Bitter Lake NWR is best known for its Family Cyprinodontidae – Pupfish Woodhouse’s toad Bufo woodhousii spectacular variety of birds, particularly the Pecos pupfish Cyprinodon pecosensis Red-spotted toad Bufo punctatus Great Plains toad Bufo cognatus large migrations of ducks, geese, and cranes Family Fundulidae – Killifishes Texas toad Bufo speciosus during the fall and winter months. Many of Plains killifish Fundulus zebrinus Western green toad Bufo debilis insidior these creatures are drawn by the refuge’s Rainwater killifish Lucania parva wetlands, which offer an abundance of food as Family Hylidae – Treefrogs Family Poeciliidae – Livebearers well as ideal nesting habitat for some species.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Pedro River in Southeastern Arizona
    Lowland Riparian Herpetofaunas: The San Pedro River in Southeastern Arizona Philip C. Rosen School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ Abstract—Previous work has shown that southeastern Arizona has a characteristic, high diversity lowland riparian herpetofauna with 62-68 or more species along major stream corridors, and 46-54 species in shorter reaches within single biomes, based on intensive fieldwork and museum record surveys. The San Pedro River supports this characteristic herpetofauna, at least some of which still occurs in the lower basin within the Sonoran Desert. It has about 64 species (55 vouchered to date), with 48-53 species within each of three somewhat ecologically homogeneous portions of the basin. This assemblage is more similar to other lowland herpetofaunas than to an example of a canyon riparian herpetofauna. Most of the characteristic riparian species are not known to be abundant along the San Pedro, and some expected species are apparently absent, suggesting that the herpetofauna may have not yet recovered from the history of grassland, cienega, and bottomland degradation. effort has been most focused in the upper basin, and it is dif- Introduction ficult to entirely separate riparian and non-riparian records, so Remarkably, the riparian herpetofauna of southeastern I have summarized the latter for the upper basin; in the lower Arizona has not been accurately described between Ruthven’s reaches, so little collecting has been done away from the river (1907) and Van Denburgh and Slevin’s (1913) annotations that this was not possible. Museum records were excluded if and records for the Santa Cruz River riparian at Tucson and localities could not be located to an adequate precision, but I the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Year of the Snake News No
    Year of the Snake News No. 6 June 2013 www.yearofthesnake.org Snakes of Narrow Habitats by Andrew M. Durso known! Known to the native people Thermophis baileyi, of Tibet for centuries, hot-spring one of two species of snakes were first discovered in 1907 Tibetan Hot-springs by Lieutenant F. Bailey, after whom Snake, the highest snake in the world, a one of the two species was named. In native of the Tibetan 2008 a second species of Thermophis Plateau. Photo by Kai was discovered and named Wang. Thermophis zhaoermii for preeminent Chinese herpetologist Zhao Ermi. One reason we know only a little about Thermophis is its high mountain habitat. Most of the Many snake species are habitat spending your whole life in one! mountain ranges in China run east- generalists, such as the familiar North Now imagine being the size of a west, but the Hengduan Mountains, American ratsnakes, Australian pencil and unable to regulate your where Hot-spring Snakes are found, tiger snakes, and European grass own body temperature, and you’re stretch north-south (the name snakes. However, some snakes are doing a pretty good approximation ‘‘Hengduan” means ‘‘to transect” so specialized, it’s hard to believe. of a Tibetan Hot-spring Snake and ‘‘cut downward” in Chinese). Here, I’ll profile a few of the most (Thermophis). These tiny snakes Parallel north-south sub-ranges of specialized snakes (in terms of reach only 2.5 feet (76 cm) in the Hengduans are separated by habitat) on Earth. length and are found at elevations deep river valleys through which flow the famous Three Parallel Hot-spring Snakes above 14,000 feet (4267 m) on the Tibetan plateau in south-central Rivers: the Nujiang (Salween), Everyone likes a good soak in a hot China, higher than any other snake Lantsang (Mekong), and Jinshajiang spring now and again, but imagine continued on p.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians and Reptiles of the State of Coahuila, Mexico, with Comparison with Adjoining States
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 593: 117–137Amphibians (2016) and reptiles of the state of Coahuila, Mexico, with comparison... 117 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.593.8484 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Amphibians and reptiles of the state of Coahuila, Mexico, with comparison with adjoining states Julio A. Lemos-Espinal1, Geoffrey R. Smith2 1 Laboratorio de Ecología-UBIPRO, FES Iztacala UNAM. Avenida los Barrios 1, Los Reyes Iztacala, Tlalnepantla, edo. de México, Mexico – 54090 2 Department of Biology, Denison University, Granville, OH, USA 43023 Corresponding author: Julio A. Lemos-Espinal ([email protected]) Academic editor: A. Herrel | Received 15 March 2016 | Accepted 25 April 2016 | Published 26 May 2016 http://zoobank.org/F70B9F37-0742-486F-9B87-F9E64F993E1E Citation: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2016) Amphibians and reptiles of the state of Coahuila, Mexico, with comparison with adjoining statese. ZooKeys 593: 117–137. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.593.8484 Abstract We compiled a checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the state of Coahuila, Mexico. The list com- prises 133 species (24 amphibians, 109 reptiles), representing 27 families (9 amphibians, 18 reptiles) and 65 genera (16 amphibians, 49 reptiles). Coahuila has a high richness of lizards in the genus Sceloporus. Coahuila has relatively few state endemics, but has several regional endemics. Overlap in the herpetofauna of Coahuila and bordering states is fairly extensive. Of the 132 species of native amphibians and reptiles, eight are listed as Vulnerable, six as Near Threatened, and six as Endangered in the IUCN Red List. In the SEMARNAT listing, 19 species are Subject to Special Protection, 26 are Threatened, and three are in Danger of Extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Files Before Requesting Examination of Original Lication (Table 2)
    often be ingested at night. A subsequent study on the acceptance of dead prey by snakes was undertaken by curator Edward George Boulenger in 1915 (Proc. Zool. POINTS OF VIEW Soc. London 1915:583–587). The situation at the London Zoo becomes clear when one refers to a quote by Mitchell in 1929: “My rule about no living prey being given except with special and direct authority is faithfully kept, and permission has to be given in only the rarest cases, these generally of very delicate or new- Herpetological Review, 2007, 38(3), 273–278. born snakes which are given new-born mice, creatures still blind and entirely un- © 2007 by Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles conscious of their surroundings.” The Destabilization of North American Colubroid 7 Edward Horatio Girling, head keeper of the snake room in 1852 at the London Zoo, may have been the first zoo snakebite victim. After consuming alcohol in Snake Taxonomy prodigious quantities in the early morning with fellow workers at the Albert Public House on 29 October, he staggered back to the Zoo and announced that he was inspired to grab an Indian cobra a foot behind its head. It bit him on the nose. FRANK T. BURBRINK* Girling was taken to a nearby hospital where current remedies available at the time Biology Department, 2800 Victory Boulevard were tried: artificial respiration and galvanism; he died an hour later. Many re- College of Staten Island/City University of New York spondents to The Times newspaper articles suggested liberal quantities of gin and Staten Island, New York 10314, USA rum for treatment of snakebite but this had already been accomplished in Girling’s *Author for correspondence; e-mail: [email protected] case.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14. Wildlife and Forest Communities 341
    chapteR 14. Wildlife and Forest Communities 341 Chapter 14. Wildlife and Forest communities Margaret Trani Griep and Beverly Collins1 key FindingS • Hotspot areas for plants of concern are Big Bend National Park; the Apalachicola area of the Southern Gulf Coast; • The South has 1,076 native terrestrial vertebrates: 179 Lake Wales Ridge and the area south of Lake Okeechobee amphibians, 525 birds, 176 mammals, and 196 reptiles. in Peninsular Florida; and coastal counties of North Species richness is highest in the Mid-South (856) and Carolina in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. The Appalachian- Coastal Plain (733), reflecting both the large area of these Cumberland highlands also contain plants identified by subregions and the diversity of habitats within them. States as species of concern. • The geography of species richness varies by taxa. • Species, including those of conservation concern, are Amphibians flourish in portions of the Piedmont and imperiled by habitat alteration, isolation, introduction of Appalachian-Cumberland highlands and across the Coastal invasive species, environmental pollutants, commercial Plain. Bird richness is highest along the coastal wetlands of development, human disturbance, and exploitation. the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico, mammal richness Conditions predicted by the forecasts will magnify these is highest in the Mid-South and Appalachian-Cumberland stressors. Each species varies in its vulnerability to highlands, and reptile richness is highest across the forecasted threats, and these threats vary by subregion. Key southern portion of the region. areas of concern arise where hotspots of vulnerable species • The South has 142 terrestrial vertebrate species coincide with forecasted stressors. considered to be of conservation concern (e.g., global • There are 614 species that are presumed extirpated from conservation status rank of critically imperiled, imperiled, selected States in the South; 64 are terrestrial vertebrates or vulnerable), 77 of which are listed as threatened or and 550 are vascular plants.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny and Revised Classification of Squamata, Including 4161 Species of Lizards and Snakes
    BMC Evolutionary Biology This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:93 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-93 Robert Alexander Pyron ([email protected]) Frank T Burbrink ([email protected]) John J Wiens ([email protected]) ISSN 1471-2148 Article type Research article Submission date 30 January 2013 Acceptance date 19 March 2013 Publication date 29 April 2013 Article URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/93 Like all articles in BMC journals, this peer-reviewed article can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below). Articles in BMC journals are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central. For information about publishing your research in BMC journals or any BioMed Central journal, go to http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/authors/ © 2013 Pyron et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes Robert Alexander Pyron 1* * Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Frank T Burbrink 2,3 Email: [email protected] John J Wiens 4 Email: [email protected] 1 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • April 7, 2016 Christopher Lawrence United States Department of Energy
    POWER April 7, 2016 Christopher Lawrence United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Nogales Interconnection Project Presidential Permit Application Dear Mr. Lawrence: Nogales Transmission, L.L.C., a subsidiary of Hunt Power, L.P., hereby submits an Application for a Presidential Permit to the Department of Energy for a proposed high-voltage direct current ("HVDC") interconnection between the electric grid in southern Arizona and the electric grid in the northwestern region of Mexico (the "Project"). The Project would consist of three components: (I) a new I 0-15 acre Gateway Substation on land currently owned by· Tucson Electric Power, where HVDC equipment would be located (with the HVDC tie initially sized at ISO MW, but capable of expansion, in phase two, to 300 MW); (2) a new, approximately 3-mile overhead 138 kV transmission line segment originating at Un iSource Energy Services' Valencia substation in Nogales, Arizona, and extending west and south to the new Gateway Substation; and (3) a new, approximately 2-mile overhead 230 kV transmission line segment extending south from the new Gateway Substation and across the US-Mexico border to interconnect with a transm ission line to be constructed in Mexico. Included in package are four documents: • Application of Nogales Transmission, L.L.C. for Presidential Permit • Environmental Assessment in support of a Presidential Permit • Biological Report • Cultural Report Nogales Transmission respectfully requests DOE to review the Presidential Permit Application and attached support documents. Please contact me if you have any questions or would like additional information. nrique Marroqui Senior Vice President Nogales Transmission, L.L.C.
    [Show full text]