DOCSLIB.ORG

Monarchs and the Enlightenment in Russia and Central Europe | University College London

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monarchs and the Enlightenment in Russia and Central Europe | University College London 09/26/21 SEHI3009: Monarchs and the Enlightenment in Russia and Central Europe | University College London SEHI3009: Monarchs and the View Online Enlightenment in Russia and Central Europe Alexander, John T., Bubonic Plague in Early Modern Russia: Public Health and Urban Disaster (Oxford University Press 2003) Augustine WR, ‘Notes toward a Portrait of the Eighteenth-Century Russian Nobility’ [1970] Canadian Slavic studies: a quarterly journal devoted to Russia and East Europe = Revue canadienne d’études slaves Balázs, Éva H., Hungary and the Habsburgs, 1765-1800: An Experiment in Enlightened Absolutism (Central European University Press 1997) Bartlett, Roger P., Human Capital: The Settlement of Foreigners in Russia, 1762-1804 (Cambridge University Press 1979) Bartlett RP, ‘The Question of Serfdom: Catherine II, the Russian Debate and the View from the Baltic Periphery (J. G. Eisen and G. H. Merkel)’, Russia in the age of the enlightenment: essays for Isabel de Madariaga, vol Studies in Russia and East Europe (Macmillan in association with the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London 1990) Bartlett RP, ‘Defences of Serfdom in Eighteenth Century Russia’, A window on Russia: papers from the V International Conference of the Study Group on Eighteenth-Century Russia, Gargnano, 1994 (La Fenice Edizioni 1996) Bartlett RP, ‘Russia’s First Abolitionist: The Political Philosophy Og J. G. Eisen’ Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas Beales D, ‘Religion and Culture’, The eighteenth century: Europe, 1688-1815, vol The short Oxford history of Europe (Oxford University Press 2000) Beales D, ‘Christians and “Philosophes”: The Case of the Austrian Enlightenment’, Enlightenment and reform in eighteenth-century Europe (I B Tauris 2005) Beales D, ‘Philosophical Kingship and Enlightened Despotism’, Enlightenment and reform in eighteenth-century Europe (I B Tauris 2005) ——, ‘Philosophical Kingship and Enlightened Despotism’, Enlightenment and reform in eighteenth-century Europe (I B Tauris 2005) ——, ‘Clergy at the Austrian Court in the Eighteenth Century’, Monarchy and religion: the transformation of royal culture in eighteenth-century Europe, vol Studies of the German 1/15 09/26/21 SEHI3009: Monarchs and the Enlightenment in Russia and Central Europe | University College London Historical Institute London (Oxford University Press 2007) ——, ‘Joseph II, Petitions and the Public Sphere’, Cultures of power in Europe during the long eighteenth century (Cambridge University Press 2007) Beales, Derek Edward Dawson, Joseph II: 1: In the Shadow of Maria Theresa, 1741-1780 (Cambridge University Press 1987) ——, Prosperity and Plunder: European Catholic Monasteries in the Age of Revolution, 1650-1815 (Cambridge University Press 2003) ——, Enlightenment and Reform in Eighteenth-Century Europe (I B Tauris 2005) ——, Joseph II.: 2: Against the World (Cambridge University Press 2009) ‘Beccaria - On Crimes and Punishments, and Other Writings’, , On crimes and punishments, and other writings, vol Cambridge texts in the history of political thought (Cambridge University Press 1995) Behrens, C. B. A., Society, Government and the Enlightenment: The Experiences of Eighteenth-Century France and Prussia (Thames and Hudson 1985) Blackbourn, David, The Conquest of Nature: Water, Landscape and the Making of Modern Germany (Jonathan Cape 2006) Blanning, T. C. W., Reform and Revolution in Mainz, 1743-1803, vol Cambridge studies in early modern history (Cambridge University Press 1974) Blanning TCW, ‘Frederick the Great and Enlightened Absolutism’, Enlightened absolutism: reform and reformers in later eighteenth-century Europe, vol Problems in focus series (Macmillan 1990) Blanning, T. C. W., Joseph II, vol Profiles in power (Longman 1994) ——, Joseph II, vol Profiles in power (Longman 1994) ——, Joseph II, vol Profiles in power (Longman 1994) Blanning TCW, ‘Frederick the Great and German Culture’, Royal and republican sovereignty in early modern Europe: essays in memory of Ragnhild Hatton (Cambridge University Press 1997) Blanning, T. C. W., The Culture of Power and the Power of Culture: Old Regime Europe, 1660-1789 (Oxford University Press 2003) ——, The Pursuit of Glory: Europe, 1648-1815, vol Penguin history of Europe (Allen Lane 2007) Brown AH, ‘S.E. Desnitsky, Adam Smith and the Nakaz of Catherine II’ (1950) 7 Oxford Slavonic papers 2/15 09/26/21 SEHI3009: Monarchs and the Enlightenment in Russia and Central Europe | University College London Bryner C, ‘The Issue of Capital Punishment in the Reign of Elizabeth Petrovna’ (1990) 49 Russian review Butterwick R, The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in European Context, C. 1500-1795 (Palgrave 2001) ——, The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in European Context, C. 1500-1795 (Palgrave 2001) ——, The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in European Context, C. 1500-1795 (Palgrave 2001) ——, ‘Polite Liberty or L’espirit Monarchique? Stanislaw August Poniatowski, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Politesse in England’, Voltaire ; Raynal ; Rousseau ; Allégorie, vol SVEC (Voltaire Foundation 2003) Butterwick R, ‘Positive and Negative Liberty in Eighteenth Century Poland ’, Liberté: héritage du passé ou idée des Lumieres? / ; heritage of the past or an idea of the Enlightenment?, vol Biblioteka badań nad wiekiem osiemnastym (Collegium Columbinum 2003) Butterwick R, ‘What Is Enlightenment (<I>oświecenie</I>)? Some Polish Answers, 1765–1820’ (2005) 3 Central Europe 19 ——, ‘What Is Enlightenment (<I>oświecenie</I>)? Some Polish Answers, 1765–1820’ (2005) 3 Central Europe 19 Butterwick R, ‘Political Discourses of the Polish Revolution, 1788-92’ (2005) 120 The English Historical Review 695 Butterwick R, ‘Between Anti-Enlightenment and Enlightened Catholicism: Provincial Preachers in Late Eighteenth Century Poland-Lithuania ’, Peripheries of the Enlightenment, vol SVEC (Voltaire Foundation 2008) ——, ‘Between Anti-Enlightenment and Enlightened Catholicism: Provincial Preachers in Late Eighteenth Century Poland-Lithuania ’, Peripheries of the Enlightenment, vol SVEC (Voltaire Foundation 2008) ——, ‘Deconfessionalization? The Policy of the Polish Revolution towards Ruthenia, 1788–1792’ (2008) 6 Central Europe 91 Butterwick, Richard, Poland’s Last King and English Culture: Stanisław August Poniatowski, 1732-1798, vol Oxford historical monographs (Clarendon Press 1998) Catherine and Reddaway, William Fiddian, Documents of Catherine the Great: The Correspondence with Voltaire and the Instruction of 1767 in the English Text of 1768 (Cambridge University Press 1931) Cizova T, ‘Beccaria in Russia’ (1961) 40 Slavonic and East European Review Clark, Christopher M., Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600-1947 (Allen Lane 2006) ‘Commentary on the Book, On Crimes and Punishments’, , Political writings, vol Cambridge texts in the history of political thought (Cambridge University Press 1994) 3/15 09/26/21 SEHI3009: Monarchs and the Enlightenment in Russia and Central Europe | University College London Cranston, Maurice, Philosophers and Pamphleteers: Political Theorists of the Enlightenment , vol OPUS (Oxford University Press 1986) ——, Philosophers and Pamphleteers: Political Theorists of the Enlightenment, vol OPUS (Oxford University Press 1986) ——, Philosophers and Pamphleteers: Political Theorists of the Enlightenment, vol OPUS (Oxford University Press 1986) ——, Philosophers and Pamphleteers: Political Theorists of the Enlightenment, vol OPUS (Oxford University Press 1986) Cranston, Maurice and Lakoff, Sanford A., The Solitary Self: Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Exile and Adversity (University of Chicago Press 1997) Crews, Robert D., For Prophet and Tsar: Islam and Empire in Russia and Central Asia (Harvard University Press 2006) Cross A, ‘The Philanthropist, the Travelling Tutor and the Empress: British Visitors and Catherine II’s Plans for Penal and Medical Reform’, Anglo-Russica: aspects of cultural relations between Great Britain and Russia in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries (Berg 1993) Davies, Simon, Sánchez Espinosa, Gabriel and Butterwick, Richard, Peripheries of the Enlightenment, vol SVEC (Voltaire Foundation 2008) ——, Peripheries of the Enlightenment, vol SVEC (Voltaire Foundation 2008) Dent, N. J. H., Rousseau, vol Routledge philosophers (Routledge 2005) Dickson, P. G. M., Finance and Government under Maria Theresia, 1740-1780 (Clarendon 1987) DICKSON PGM, ‘ Monarchy and Bureaucracy in Late Eighteenth-Century Austria ’ (1995) CX The English Historical Review 323 ——, ‘ Monarchy and Bureaucracy in Late Eighteenth-Century Austria ’ (1995) CX The English Historical Review 323 Dickson PGM, ‘Baron Bartenstein on Count Haugwitz’s “New System” of Government’, History and biography: essays in honour of Derek Beales (Cambridge University Press 1996) ——, ‘Joseph II’s Reshaping of the Austrian Church*’ (2009) 36 The Historical Journal Diderot, Denis, Mason, John Hope and Wokler, Robert, Political Writings, vol Cambridge texts in the history of political thought (Cambridge University Press 1992) Dixon, S., Catherine the Great, vol Profiles in Power series (Harlow 2001) ——, Catherine the Great, vol Profiles in Power series (Harlow 2001) 4/15 09/26/21 SEHI3009: Monarchs and the Enlightenment in Russia and Central Europe | University College London ——, Catherine the Great, vol Profiles in Power series (Harlow 2001) ——, Catherine the Great, vol Profiles in Power series (Harlow 2001) Dixon S, ‘Religious Ritual at the Eighteenth Century Russian Court’, Monarchy and religion: the transformation of royal culture in eighteenth-century Europe, vol
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796
    Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 By Thomas Lucius Lowish A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor Kinch Hoekstra Spring 2021 Abstract Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 by Thomas Lucius Lowish Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Historians of Russian monarchy have avoided the concept of sovereignty, choosing instead to describe how monarchs sought power, authority, or legitimacy. This dissertation, which centers on Catherine the Great, the empress of Russia between 1762 and 1796, takes on the concept of sovereignty as the exercise of supreme and untrammeled power, considered legitimate, and shows why sovereignty was itself the major desideratum. Sovereignty expressed parity with Western rulers, but it would allow Russian monarchs to bring order to their vast domain and to meaningfully govern the lives of their multitudinous subjects. This dissertation argues that Catherine the Great was a crucial figure in this process. Perceiving the confusion and disorder in how her predecessors exercised power, she recognized that sovereignty required both strong and consistent procedures as well as substantial collaboration with the broadest possible number of stakeholders. This was a modern conception of sovereignty, designed to regulate the swelling mechanisms of the Russian state. Catherine established her system through careful management of both her own activities and the institutions and servitors that she saw as integral to the system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inextricable Link Between Literature and Music in 19Th
    COMPOSERS AS STORYTELLERS: THE INEXTRICABLE LINK BETWEEN LITERATURE AND MUSIC IN 19TH CENTURY RUSSIA A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Music Ashley Shank December 2010 COMPOSERS AS STORYTELLERS: THE INEXTRICABLE LINK BETWEEN LITERATURE AND MUSIC IN 19TH CENTURY RUSSIA Ashley Shank Thesis Approved: Accepted: _______________________________ _______________________________ Advisor Interim Dean of the College Dr. Brooks Toliver Dr. Dudley Turner _______________________________ _______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Mr. George Pope Dr. George R. Newkome _______________________________ _______________________________ School Director Date Dr. William Guegold ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECULAR ART MUSIC IN RUSSIA……..………………………………………………..……………….1 Introduction……………………..…………………………………………………1 The Introduction of Secular High Art………………………………………..……3 Nicholas I and the Rise of the Noble Dilettantes…………………..………….....10 The Rise of the Russian School and Musical Professionalism……..……………19 Nationalism…………………………..………………………………………..…23 Arts Policies and Censorship………………………..…………………………...25 II. MUSIC AND LITERATURE AS A CULTURAL DUET………………..…32 Cross-Pollination……………………………………………………………...…32 The Russian Soul in Literature and Music………………..……………………...38 Music in Poetry: Sound and Form…………………………..……………...……44 III. STORIES IN MUSIC…………………………………………………… ….51 iii Opera……………………………………………………………………………..57
    [Show full text]
  • February, 2010 Kevin J. Mckenna EDUCATION
    February, 2010 Kevin J. McKenna EDUCATION: Ph.D. Degree 1977, University of Colorado: Slavic Languages and Literatures M.A. Degree 1971, University of Colorado: Russian Literature B.A. Degree 1970, Oklahoma State University (OSU): Humanities NDEA Intensive Slavic Language Institutes at the University of Kansas and Leningrad State University, 1968, 1969, 1970 Dissertation Title: Catherine the Great's ‘Vsiakaia Vsiachina’ and The ‘Spectator’ Tradition of the Satirical Journal of Morals and Manners RESEARCH GRANTS, FELLOWSHIPS, AWARDS: Consultant and collaborator to U.S. Department of Education/Department of State grant to develop a nationwide portfolio project for High School through College Critical Foreign Language Programs in Arabic, Chinese and Russian (2009-2013) Consultant and collaborator to U.S. Department of Education Title VI National Resource Center grant proposal to promote and strengthen international studies-based curricula in higher education (PI Professor Ned McMahon) Recipient of the Robert V. Daniels Award for Outstanding Contributions to the Field of International Studies, May 7, 2009 Nominee for Kroepsch-Maurice Outstanding Teacher Award, 2009/2010 U.S. State Department grant ($350,000.00) “Karelia/Vermont Sustainable Development Partnership, 2007-2010.” Co-Principal Investigator with Prof. Pat Stokowski. Named as UVM Woodrow Wilson Fellow for "Scholars as Teachers," 2000-2001 Named as UVM Service-Learning Faculty Fellow, 2000-2001 2 RESEARCH GRANTS, FELLOWSHIPS, AWARDS: (continued) Principal Investigator for Department
    [Show full text]
  • On the Question of the Main Concepts and Theories of the Origin of the State
    Law/1. Theory of State and Law Zhadan V. N. PhD in Law, Associate Professor Kazan Federal University, Elabuga Institute, Russia ON THE QUESTION OF THE MAIN CONCEPTS AND THEORIES OF THE ORIGIN OF THE STATE Abstract. The article is devoted to the discussion of the main concepts and theories of the origin of the state based on the analysis of General theoretical provisions of legal science, scientific approaches and author's understanding. Key words: question, basic, concept, theory, origin, state, analysis, General theoretical provisions, approaches. In the science of state and law (and especially the theory of state and law), there are many scientific materials that consider the laws of the origin, development and functioning of the state and law, historical types, forms, functions and other aspects that characterize the state and law [1-2]. Many scientists specializing in the theory of state and law (and in other areas of scientific research) offer their views on the theoretical characteristics of the state and law, their features, state-political forms and functions, and many other aspects, which does not deprive the author to Express his opinion on some issues related to the discussion of the origin of the state. The subject of this review will be questions about the main concepts and theories of the origin of the state. Based on the research subject of interest the following questions: what is a theory of the origin of the state; what the right science is called basic theory of the origin of the state; what are the terms "concept" and "theory"; which is accepted to highlight the concepts and theories of the origin of the state; how key concepts and theories explain the emergence of the state? The author shares the scientific approach that the study of theories of the origin of the state (and law) is not only cognitive (theoretical), but also political and practical in nature [3, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact and Presence of the Writings of Laurence Sterne In
    The Impact and Presence of the Writings o f Laurence Sterne in Eighteenth-Century Russia © Maria Lobytsyna A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Letters Department of English University of Glasgow Department of Slavonic Languages and Literatures 2001 ProQuest Number: 13819011 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13819011 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 GLASGOW 1 UNIVERSITY (LIBRARY: ooPM 'i 2 Abstract The works of Laurence Sterne have made a significant and long-lasting contribution to the literary and cultural life of Russia. The early translations of the Letters from Yorick and Eliza and A Sentimental Journey as well as the critical discussions in the Russian media of the 1770s-1790s brought Russia into the mainstream of eighteenth century politics of Sensibility. The eighteenth-century Russian translations of Sterne’s Letters from Yorick to Eliza by Apukhtin (1789), Kolmakov (1793) and Karin (1795) and the first translation of A Sentimental Journey by Kolmakov (1793) reinforced the contemporary approach to questions of self­ development and morality, having anticipated the interpretation of literature as the enlightenment of the heart.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use and Abuse of Thomas Paine CONFERENCE PROGRAMME
    Citizen of the World: The Use and Abuse of Thomas Paine CONFERENCE PROGRAMME Manchester Metropolitan University and the People’s History Museum, 29-30 November 2013 Friday 29 November 8.30am-9.30am: Registration and Welcome 9.30am-11.30am: Panel One: Paine, Democracy, and the Rights of Man Chair: TBC Gregory Claeys (Royal Holloway) ‘Paine and Rights’ Maurizio Griffo (University "Federico II" – Naples) ‘Thomas Paine and the Two Kinds of Natural Rights: A Biographical Approach’ Patrick Thomas (Aberystwyth) ‘Man as Neighbour in Paine’s Political Thought’ Gary Berton (Iona College and Thomas Paine National Historical Association) ‘The Distortion of Paine’s Philosophy of Government in Modern Politics’ 11.30am-12pm: Tea and Coffee break 12pm-1.30pm: Panel Two: Paine, Christianity and Deism Chair: TBC Benjamin E. Park (Cambridge): ‘The Age of Christianities: Paine’s Deism, America’s Identities, and the Fracturing of Political Theologies in the Newly United States’ Rosina Martucci (Salerno) ‘Thomas Paine: Discovering the Religious Side of his Soul’ Theodore W. Marotta (SUNY, Albany) ‘Defending God: Thomas Paine’s Last Crusade’ 1.30-2.30pm: Lunch 2.30pm-4pm: Panel Three: The Image and Idea of Paine in a Transatlantic Context Chair: Catherine Armstrong (MMU) Matteo Battistini (Bologna) Atlantic Fragments of Thomas Paine: Democratic Language and its Class Meaning in Paine’s Early Nineteenth Century Legacy on both the English and American Shores of the Ocean. Sam Edwards (MMU) ‘He Came From America Didn’t He? Identity, Nationality and the 1964 Thetford
    [Show full text]
  • April, 2016 Kevin J. Mckenna EDUCATION
    April, 2016 Kevin J. McKenna EDUCATION: Ph.D. Degree 1977, University of Colorado: Slavic Languages and Literatures M.A. Degree 1971, University of Colorado: Russian Literature B.A. Degree 1970, Oklahoma State University (OSU): Humanities NDEA Intensive Slavic Language Institutes at the University of Kansas and Leningrad State University, 1968, 1969, 1970 Dissertation Title: Catherine the Great's ‘Vsiakaia Vsiachina’ and The ‘Spectator’ Tradition of the Satirical Journal of Morals and Manners RESEARCH GRANTS, FELLOWSHIPS, AWARDS: Recipient of Lattie F. Coor Endowment grant for travel expenses to St. Petersburg, Russia to deliver a an invited paper at the Academy of Sciences International Meeting devoted to the 750th anniversary of the death of Alexander Nevsky: “Дидактическая роль русских пословиц и поговорок в фильме Алексангдр Невский Сергея Эйзенштейна.” Recipient of Lattie F. Coor Faculty Development Award ($2,500.) to conduct research on my book: The Role of the Russian Proverb in Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s Fictional and Publicistic Writing Named a Solzhenitsyn Fellow at the Solzhenitsyn Museum/Archives, Moscow (2011- 2012) Invited Keynote Speaker to speak on research for my Solzhenitsyn book at Samara State University (Samara, Russia) at a Conference on the Moral Basis of the Development of Contemporary Russian Society (February 28th—March 4th, 2011) Consultant and collaborator to U.S. Department of Education/Department of State grant to develop a nationwide portfolio project for High School through College Critical Foreign Language Programs in Arabic, Chinese and Russian (2009-2013) RESEARCH GRANTS, FELLOWSHIPS, AWARDS: (continued) 2 Recipient of the Robert V. Daniels Award for Outstanding Contributions to the Field of International Studies, May 7, 2009 Nominee for Kroepsch-Maurice Outstanding Teacher Award, 2009/2010 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE L. Name & Institutional Affiliation: Alexander
    CURRICULUM VITAE l. Name & Institutional Affiliation: Alexander Levitsky Professor of Slavic Languages & Literatures Department of Slavic Studies, Box E, Brown University, Providence, R.I. 029l2 e-mail: [email protected] Telephone: (401) 863 2689 or 863 2835 FAX:(401) 863 7330 2. Home Address: 23 Ray Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02906, USA Telephone: (40l) 272-3098 3. Education (most recent first): 1977 Ph.D. University of Michigan: Dissertation Topic: The Sacred Ode (Oda Duxovnaja) in Eighteenth-Century Russian Literary Culture, Ann Arbor, l977 (Copyright, October l977) 1972 M.A., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 1970 B.A., University of Minnesota (magna cum laude) 1964 Gymnasium in Prague, Czechoslovakia (summa cum laude [straight A average]) 4. Professional appointments (most recent first): Present (from 1975) Professor (Assistant, Associate, Full), Slavic Department, Brown University 2007-2017 (and 1976-91) Director of Graduate Studies, Slavic Dept, Brown University 2007 (Spring Sem.) Visiting Professor, Harvard University 2004 (Spring Sem.) Visiting Senior Professor, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 2004 (Spring Sem.) Visit. Senior Scholar, Collegium Hieronimus Pragensis, Prague, Czech Republic 1997-2003 Chair, Dept. of Slavic Languages, Brown University 2000 (Fall Semester) Visiting Senior Professor, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 1999-present Academic Advisory Board, Collegium Hieronimus Pragensis, Czech Rep. 1993-1994 Acting Chair, Dept. of Slavic Languages, Brown University 1993-present Full Professor, Brown University l983-1993 Associate Professor, Brown University l982 (Summer Sem.) Visiting Professor, Middlebury College l977-82 Assistant Professor, Brown University l975-l976 Instructor, Brown University l975 (Summer Sem.) Lecturer, Middlebury College l974-75 Teaching Assistant, University of Michigan 5. Completed Research, Scholarship and Creative Work (291 items in chronologically set groups a-i): A.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodological Basis of Legal Personality of the State (Civil Aspects)
    Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues Volume 20, Special Issue 1, 2017 METHODOLOGICAL BASIS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF THE STATE (CIVIL ASPECTS) Anatoliy V Kostruba, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University ABSTRACT Article deals with the investigation the legal nature of the state. It was found that the state is the allied unity of settled people provided with primary power of primacy. The essence of the state lies in creation of conditions for the development of the civil society, implementation of shared interests of members of society. The state is a means of social compromise of members of civil society. It appears not only as a form of provision of such social compromise, but also as an active and equal member of the relevant legal relations. The ability of the state to be an active participant in social communications configures its natural right that can and should be implemented. As a result, the subject gets legal opportunities for its activities and transformed into a legal person the nature of which is revealed through the signs of interest, will of the subject and its individual separation. Since the state is a union of interests of persons united in the unified social organism for their support, the fact that the legal entity as a legal person synthesizes in itself not only characteristics peculiar to the corporation, but also characteristics peculiar to the state as a legal person is justified. Implementation of the civil capacity of the state is revealed through the institution of representation. The justification of universal character of legal capacity of the state is given.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Perspective in Russian Intellectual History: Russian Political Thought in Early Modern Times
    Вивлioѳика: E-Journal of Eighteenth-Century Russian Studies, Vol. 7 (2019): 119-123 119 __________________________________________________________________________________ A New Perspective in Russian Intellectual History: Russian Political Thought in Early Modern Times Derek Offord The University of Bristol [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ G. M. Hamburg, Russia’s Path Toward Enlightenment: Faith, Politics, and Reason, 1500– 1801. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2016, 912 p. ISBN: 9780300113136 ___________________________________________________________________________ Gary Hamburg’s erudite and thoughtful survey of early modern Russian thought began its life as part of a more general study of Russian thought up until the revolutions of 1917. As originally conceived, this study would have built upon the author’s already substantial corpus of work on nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Russian history and thought, most notably his monograph of 1992 on Boris Chicherin and his volume of 2010, co-edited with Randall A. Poole, on freedom and dignity in Russian philosophy from 1830 to 1930. As work progressed, however, it became clear that thinkers active from the early sixteenth century to the end of the eighteenth demanded more attention than Hamburg had anticipated; in fact, they came to merit a book all to themselves. The resulting 900-page product of his reflection on the prehistory of modern Russian thought enables him to straddle what are generally perceived as two great divides: First, the supposed divide between Muscovite and Imperial Russia and, second, that between the traditional religious and the secular enlightened forms of Russian culture. The enormous volume of material that Hamburg presents in this monograph is organized in three parts within a broadly chronological framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796
    Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 By Thomas Lucius Lowish A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor Kinch Hoekstra Spring 2021 Abstract Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 by Thomas Lucius Lowish Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Historians of Russian monarchy have avoided the concept of sovereignty, choosing instead to describe how monarchs sought power, authority, or legitimacy. This dissertation, which centers on Catherine the Great, the empress of Russia between 1762 and 1796, takes on the concept of sovereignty as the exercise of supreme and untrammeled power, considered legitimate, and shows why sovereignty was itself the major desideratum. Sovereignty expressed parity with Western rulers, but it would allow Russian monarchs to bring order to their vast domain and to meaningfully govern the lives of their multitudinous subjects. This dissertation argues that Catherine the Great was a crucial figure in this process. Perceiving the confusion and disorder in how her predecessors exercised power, she recognized that sovereignty required both strong and consistent procedures as well as substantial collaboration with the broadest possible number of stakeholders. This was a modern conception of sovereignty, designed to regulate the swelling mechanisms of the Russian state. Catherine established her system through careful management of both her own activities and the institutions and servitors that she saw as integral to the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope and Slavery
    Proceedings of the British Academy, 91,27753 Pope and Slavery HOWARD ERSKINE-HILL I am certainly desirous to run from my Country, if you’ll run from yours, and study Popery and Slavery abroad a while, to reconcile ourselves to the Church & State we may find at home on our return. (Pope to the Earl of Marchmont, 22 June 1740 Correspondence, IV. 250) 1 IN 1790 THE POET Alexander Radishchev, called ‘The First Russian Radical’, printed his Journey from St. Petersburg to Moscow, criticising the condition of the serfs under Catherine the Great, and dedicating it without permission to his friend, the poet A. M. Kutuzov. Kutuzov, alarmed with reason at this dedication, recounts how on an earlier occasion he had remonstrated with Radishchev, quoting to him in English Pope’s translation of Homer’s lfiad,Bk. I, the lines of Calchas to Achilles on the perils of telling unwelcome truths to kings: For I must speak what Wisdom would conceal, And Truths invidious [to] the Great reveal. Bold is the task! when Subjects grown too wise Instruct a Monarch where his Error lies; For tho’ we deem the short-liv’d fury past Be sure, the Mighty will revenge at last. (I. 101-6)’ 0 The British Academy 1998. ‘In my reference to Radishchev I am indebted to Professor Monica Partridge and to Professor A. G. Cross. The lines quoted from Pope’s Iliad translation by A. M. Kutuzov are I. 101-6; T. E. VIII. 92. The allusion is briefly discussed in David Marshal Lang, The First Russian Radical 1749-1802 (London, 1959), pp.
    [Show full text]