Morphological and Genetic Concordance of Cutthroat Trout Diversification from Western North America

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Morphological and Genetic Concordance of Cutthroat Trout Diversification from Western North America Canadian Journal of Zoology Morphological and genetic concordance of cutthroat trout diversification from western North America Journal: Canadian Journal of Zoology Manuscript ID cjz-2020-0106.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 27-Nov-2020 Author: Complete List of Authors: Keeley, Ernest; Idaho State University, Department of Biological Sciences Loxterman, Janet; Idaho State University, Department of Biological Sciences Matsaw, Sammy;Draft Idaho State University, Department of Biological Sciences Njoroge, Zacharia; Idaho State University, Department of Biological Sciences Seiler, Meredith; Idaho State University, Department of Biological Sciences Seiler, Steven; Idaho State University, Department of Biological Sciences Is your manuscript invited for consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue?: MORPHOLOGY < Discipline, native distribution, phenotype, diversity, Keyword: intraspecific variation, cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarkii © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 42 Canadian Journal of Zoology 1 Morphological and genetic concordance of cutthroat trout diversification from western 2 North America 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ernest R. Keeley, Janet L. Loxterman, Sammy L. Matsaw, Zacharia M. Njoroge, Meredith B. 9 Seiler, and Steven M. Seiler 10 11 Draft 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 E.R. Keeley, J.L Loxterman, S.L. Matsaw, and Z. M. Njoroge. Department of Biological 20 Sciences, Stop 8007, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA. 21 M.B. Seiler and S.M. Seiler. Department of Biology, Lock Haven University, Lock Haven, PA 22 17745, USA. 23 Corresponding Author: Ernest Keeley (email: [email protected]). 1 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Zoology Page 2 of 42 24 Abstract 25 The cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarkii (Richardson, 1836), is one of the most widely 26 distributed species of freshwater fish in western North America. Occupying a diverse range of 27 habitats, they exhibit significant phenotypic variability that is often recognized by intraspecific 28 taxonomy. Recent molecular phylogenies have described phylogenetic diversification across 29 cutthroat trout populations, but no study has provided a range-wide morphological comparison of 30 taxonomic divisions. In this study, we used linear and geometric-based morphometrics to 31 determine if phylogenetic and subspecies divisions correspond to morphological variation in 32 cutthroat trout, using replicate populations from throughout the geographic range of the species. 33 Our data indicate significant morphologicalDraft divergence of intraspecific categories in some, but 34 not all, cutthroat trout subspecies. We also compare morphological distance measures with 35 distance measures of mtDNA sequence divergence. DNA sequence divergence was positively 36 correlated with morphological distance measures, indicating that morphologically more similar 37 subspecies have lower sequence divergence in comparison to morphologically distant 38 subspecies. Given these results, integrating both approaches to describing intraspecific variation 39 may be necessary for developing a comprehensive conservation plan in wide-ranging species. 40 Key words: phenotype, diversity, morphology, native distribution, intraspecific variation, 41 cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarkii. 2 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 3 of 42 Canadian Journal of Zoology 42 Introduction 43 Widely distributed species often exhibit significant phenotypic variation across their 44 geographic range (Mayr 1963). Intraspecific variability can represent substantial levels of 45 diversity, allowing different populations to occupy a variety of habitats or ecological conditions 46 (Kolbe et al. 2012; Nosil 2012; Wellborn and Langerhans 2015; Des Roches et al. 2018). 47 Biologists have long recognized the importance of within-species measures of biodiversity by 48 assigning subspecies names to populations from different geographic locations that exhibit 49 phenotypic differences (Wilting et al. 2015). More recent approaches have attempted to 50 recognize within-species diversity by assigning populations to 'evolutionarily significant units' or 51 'distinct population segments' based on Draftphenotypic or genetic differences (Waples 1991; Haig 52 and D'Elia 2010). The need to use such approaches has been reinforced by examples of locally 53 adapted populations with unique morphological, behavioral, or life history characteristics (Smith 54 and Skulason 1996; Schluter 2000; Gillespie 2012; Blanquart et al. 2013). When dramatic 55 reductions in widely distributed species occur, how to implement recovery programs can be 56 complicated by a lack of understanding, or uncertainty, in identifying intraspecific diversity 57 (Bálint et al. 2011). In the face of a rapidly changing planet, maintaining the range of diversity 58 found within a species may increase the probability of species persistence and function within 59 ecosystems (Bellard et al. 2012; Des Roches et al. 2018; Raffard et al. 2019). 60 Historically, efforts to understand and describe intraspecific diversity have often occurred 61 when biologists document significant phenotypic variation among populations of a species, and 62 as a result, they describe different subspecies (Haig and D'Elia 2010; Braby et al. 2012). As 63 many subspecies names originated in the 19th and early 20th century, before the application of 64 quantitative statistical techniques, subspecies descriptions are frequently only qualitative in form 3 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Zoology Page 4 of 42 65 and may be based on limited geographic sampling (Remsen 2010; Winker 2010). The 66 widespread occurrence of habitat alteration and fragmentation has raised numerous concerns for 67 many taxa, often resulting in the need to reevaluate their distribution and conservation status 68 (Haig et al. 2006; Hanski 2011). The development of modern DNA technologies and molecular 69 markers has facilitated the ability of biologists to identify and establish the extent of focal taxa; 70 however, the use of such molecular data has at times created conflicting views with past 71 qualitative descriptions of intraspecific variation (Apostolidis et al. 1997; Fitzpatrick 2010; 72 Huang and Knowles 2016). While DNA divergence data may provide an enticingly 73 straightforward method of defining intraspecific groups, phylogenetic grouping based on single 74 or few genetic loci may not capture recently evolved adaptive differentiation (Zink 2004; Taylor 75 and McPhail 2008; Lamichhaney et al. 2012).Draft Multivariate morphometric techniques provide an 76 additional tool for quantifying a wide range of morphological variation that can incorporate a 77 suite of phenotypic characteristics, including measures of adaptive variation (Rohlf and Marcus 78 1993; McGuigan et al. 2003; Komiya et al. 2011). Digital imaging technology has further 79 simplified and standardized the collection of morphometric data and improved the ability of 80 researchers to increase the geographic extent of samples included in analyses (Mojekwu and 81 Anumudu 2015; Cardini 2020). Despite the improvements made in quantifying intraspecific 82 variation using molecular and morphometric methods, the two approaches have often been 83 pursued in isolation of each other and sometimes leading to arguments for one method over the 84 other (Hillis 1987; Phillimore et al. 2008; Losos et al. 2012). Given the need for evaluating the 85 status of subspecies of conservation concern (Haig et al. 2006; Venter et al. 2006; IUCN 2020), a 86 better understanding of the concordance between morphometric and molecular methods in 87 quantifying intraspecific variation is greatly needed. 4 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 5 of 42 Canadian Journal of Zoology 88 The cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarkii (Richardson, 1836), is a widely-distributed 89 freshwater fish species native to western North America (Behnke 1980, 1992). Since first being 90 described by Richardson (1836), numerous common and scientific names have been used to 91 describe different species, subspecies, and populations of this polytypic group (Jordan et al. 92 1930; La Rivers 1962; Behnke 1965, 1992; Trotter 2008). Current taxonomic classifications list 93 14 subspecies of cutthroat trout, two of which are thought to be extinct (Behnke 1992; Trotter 94 2008; Trotter et al. 2018). Cutthroat trout are distributed along a north-south axis from Alaska to 95 New Mexico (Fig. 1), commonly occupying stream and lake habitats in contrasting areas ranging 96 from temperate rainforests to arid desert ecosystems (Behnke 1992; Trotter 2008). Numerous 97 populations of cutthroat trout have declined in abundance or have been extirpated as a result of 98 human-induced factors including habitatDraft loss and alteration, and by competition, predation, 99 disease, and hybridization through the introduction of non-native species (Young 1995; Trotter 100 2008). Phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequence variation of cutthroat trout have revealed 101 concordance with some subspecies categories as well as more recently recognized evolutionary 102 lineages (Wilson and Turner 2009; Houston et al. 2012; Loxterman and Keeley 2012; Brunelli et 103 al. 2013; Shiozawa et al. 2018); however, little comparative data exist for range-wide 104 morphological comparisons of subspecies categories or its concordance with molecular data (for 105 some pairwise comparisons see: Qadri 1959; Dieffenbach 1966; Bestgen et al. 2019).
Recommended publications
  • Oncorhynchus Mykiss)
    Growth Genes Are Implicated in The Evolutionary Divergence of Sympatric Piscivorous and Insectivorous Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Jared A. Grummer ( [email protected] ) University of British Columbia Michael Whitlock University of British Columbia Patricia Schulte University of British Columbia Eric Taylor University of British Columbia Research Article Keywords: genome scan, small-effect loci, FST, GO analysis, rainbow trout, ecotype Posted Date: February 5th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-157772/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published at BMC Ecology and Evolution on April 22nd, 2021. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01795-9. RH: GENOMIC DIVERGENCE OF SYMPATRIC TROUT ECOTYPES Growth genes are implicated in the evolutionary divergence of sympatric piscivorous and insectivorous rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Jared A. Grummer1, Michael Whitlock1, Patricia M. Schulte1, and Eric B. Taylor1,2 1Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Beaty Biodiversity Museum, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada Corresponding author: Jared A. Grummer; E-mail: [email protected] 1 1 Abstract.— 2 Background: Identifying ecologically significant phenotypic traits and the genomic 3 mechanisms that underly them are crucial steps in understanding the traits associated with 4 population divergence. We used genome-wide data to identify genomic regions associated 5 with a key trait that distinguishes two ecotypes of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)– 6 insectivores and piscivores – that coexist in Kootenay Lake, southeastern British Columbia, 7 for the non-breeding portion of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe
    Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Lara Ibrahim, M.Sc. aus Mazeraat Assaf, Libanon Berichter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Andreas Schäffer Prof. Dr. Christoph Schäfers Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 30. Juli 2015 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Universitätsbibliothek online verfügbar Erklärung Ich versichere, dass ich diese Doktorarbeit selbständig und nur unter Verwendung der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Weiterhin versichere ich, die aus benutzten Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht zu haben. Lara Ibrahim Aachen, am 18 März 2015 Zusammenfassung Die Zulassung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft verlangt unter anderem eine Abschätzung des Risikos für Organismen in der Umwelt, die nicht Ziel der Anwendung sind. Unvertretbare Auswirkungen auf den Naturhalt sollen vermieden werden. Die ökologische Risikoanalyse stellt die dafür benötigten Informationen durch eine Abschätzung der Exposition der Organismen und der sich daraus ergebenden Effekte bereit. Die Effektabschätzung beruht dabei hauptsächlich auf standardisierten ökotoxikologischen Tests im Labor mit wenigen, oft nicht einheimischen Stellvertreterarten. In diesen Tests werden z. B. Effekte auf das Überleben, das Wachstum und/oder die Reproduktion von Fischen bei verschiedenen Konzentrationen der Testsubstanz gemessen und Endpunkte wie die LC50 (Lethal Concentrations for 50%) oder eine NOEC (No Observed Effect Concentration, z. B. für Wachstum oder Reproduktionsparameter) abgeleitet. Für Fische und Wirbeltiere im Allgemeinen beziehen sich die spezifischen Schutzziele auf das Überleben von Individuen und die Abundanz und Biomasse von Populationen.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Selectivity of Brown Trout (Salmo Trutta) in Loch Ness, Scotland Stephen Thackeray, Jonathan Grey and Roger Jones (S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aquatic Commons FEEDING SELECTIVITY OF BROWN TROUT 47 FEEDING SELECTIVITY OF BROWN TROUT (SALMO TRUTTA) IN LOCH NESS, SCOTLAND STEPHEN THACKERAY, JONATHAN GREY AND ROGER JONES (S. J. Thackeray, Dr J. Grey and Dr R. I. Jones, Department of Biological Sciences, IENS, Lancaster University, Lancaster LAI 4YQ, England.) [E-mail: s.j. thackeray @ lancaster. ac. uk] Introduction Loch Ness (Fig. 1) lies in the Great Glen, a glacially-deepened rift which was originally tectonic in origin. Hence the loch has a very regular trench-like morphometry, with steeply shelving sides sloping down to a flat bed. This produces a restricted littoral zone, where powerful wave action on the steep, rocky shores permits growth of few macrophytes (Burgis & Morris 1987). The loch has the greatest mean depth of any lake in Britain and Ireland (ca. 132 metres) and comprises two basins, the north reaching a maximum depth of 227 metres and the south a maximum of 221 metres (Young & Shine 1993). Consequently, Loch Ness contains the largest volume of water for any lake in the British Isles (74.52 m3 x 108). The loch drains eastwards via the River Ness and has been connected to the west coast by the Caledonian canal since 1822. It is oligotrophic and the water is extensively stained with peat (Burgis & Morris 1987), so that light attenuates rapidly in the Loch Ness water column. Martin & Shine (1988) found that most of the pelagic fish in Loch Ness inhabited the top 30 metres of the water column, with Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus dominating much of this stratum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abundance of Large, Piscivorous Ferox Trout (Salmo Trutta) in Loch Rannoch, Scotland
    The abundance of large, piscivorous Ferox Trout (Salmo trutta) in Loch Rannoch, Scotland Alastair Thorne1, Alisdair I. MacDonald1 and Joseph L. Thorley2 1 Freshwater Laboratory, Marine Scotland, Pitlochry, Scotland 2 Poisson Consulting, Nelson, British Columbia, Canada ABSTRACT Background. Ferox Trout are large, long-lived piscivorous Brown Trout (Salmo trutta). Due to their exceptionally large size, Ferox Trout are highly sought after by anglers while their life-history strategy, which includes delayed maturation, multiphasic growth and extended longevity, is of interest to ecological and evolutionary modelers. However, despite their recreational and theoretical importance, little is known about the typical abundance of Ferox Trout. Methods. To rectify this situation a 16 year angling-based mark-recapture study was conducted on Loch Rannoch, which at 19 km2 is one of the largest lakes in the United Kingdom. Results. A hierarchical Bayesian Jolly-Seber analysis of the data suggest that if individual differences in catchability are negligible the population of Ferox Trout in Loch Rannoch in 2009 was approximately 71 fish. The results also suggest that a single, often unaccompanied, highly-experienced angler was able to catch roughly 8% of the available fish on an annual basis. Discussion. It is recommended that anglers adopt a precautionary approach and release all trout with a fork length ≥400 mm caught by trolling in Loch Rannoch. There is an urgent need to assess the status of Ferox Trout in other lakes. Subjects Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science, Conservation Biology, Ecology, Statistics Submitted 11 May 2016 Accepted 3 October 2016 Keywords Survival, Hierarchical, Bayesian, Exploitation, Jolly-Seber, Abundance, Ferox Trout, Published 1 November 2016 Brown Trout, Piscivorous Corresponding author Joseph L.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Brown Trout (Salmo Trutta, L.1758) Growth and Diet in Wester Ross, Scotland
    BSc. HONOURS DEGREE IN Biosciences Trophic Status and Ontogeny: An Analysis of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta, L.1758) Growth and Diet in Wester Ross, Scotland Sara Mamo: M00209355 Department of Health and Social Sciences Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Kett 2013 1 Disclaimer This is an undergraduate student project. Views expressed and contents presented in these projects are those of students ONLY. Module leaders, project supervisors, the Natural Sciences Department and Middlesex University are not responsible for any of the views or contents in these projects. 2 Contents Page number Declaration………………………………………………….……………………………………………….............................I Abstract……………………………………………………..…………………………………………………………………………….II Acknowledgment……………………………………………………..……………………………………………………….......III CHAPTER I: Introduction…………………………………..……………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 . Salmonids………………………………………………………………………………………………....................1 1.2 . Trout diet and feeding behaviour…………………………………………………………………………….….2 1.3 . Food supply and growth of trout……………………………………………………………………………..….4 1.4 . Age and growth determination…………………………………………………………………………………...5 1.5 . Plasticity and Genetic control of fish growth……………………………………………………………….8 1.6 . Predation and competition…………………………………………………………………….....................9 1.7 . Aims and objectives…………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 CHAPTER ll: Materials and methods……………………………………………………….……………………………………9 2.1. Study area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 2.2. Fish diet analysis (gut contents)…………………………………………………………………………………..11
    [Show full text]
  • Anadromy, Potamodromy and Residency in Brown Trout Salmo Trutta: the Role of Genes and the Environment
    Received: 13 March 2019 Accepted: 9 May 2019 DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14005 REVIEW PAPER FISH Anadromy, potamodromy and residency in brown trout Salmo trutta: the role of genes and the environment Andrew Ferguson1 | Thomas E. Reed2 | Tom F. Cross2 | Philip McGinnity2 | Paulo A. Prodöhl1 1School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK Abstract 2School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Brown trout Salmo trutta is endemic to Europe, western Asia and north-western Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Africa; it is a prominent member of freshwater and coastal marine fish faunas. The Ireland species shows two resident (river-resident, lake-resident) and three main facultative Correspondence migratory life histories (downstream–upstream within a river system, fluvial–adfluvial Paulo Prodöhl, Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, potamodromous; to and from a lake, lacustrine–adfluvial (inlet) or allacustrine (outlet) ’ Queen s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, potamodromous; to and from the sea, anadromous). River-residency v. migration is a Nothern Ireland, UK. Email: [email protected] balance between enhanced feeding and thus growth advantages of migration to a particular habitat v. the costs of potentially greater mortality and energy expenditure. Funding information T.E.R. was funded by an ERC Starting Grant Fluvial–adfluvial migration usually has less feeding improvement, but less mortality (639192-ALH) and an SFI ERC Support Award. risk, than lacustrine–adfluvial or allacustrine and anadromous, but the latter vary P.McG., P.A.P. and T.E.R. were supported in part by Grants from Science Foundation among catchments as to which is favoured.
    [Show full text]
  • (Salmo Trutta) in Loch Rannoch, Scotland
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/029801; this version posted January 27, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. The Low Abundance and High Catchability of Large Piscivorous Ferox Trout (Salmo trutta) in Loch Rannoch, Scotland Alastair Thorne1, Alasdair I. MacDonald1, Joseph L. Thorley2,* 1 Marine Scotland, Freshwater Laboratory, Pitlochry, Perthshire, Scotland 2 Poisson Consulting Ltd., Nelson, British Columbia, Canada * [email protected] Abstract Ferox Trout are large, long-lived piscivorous Brown Trout (Salmo trutta). Due to their exceptionally large size, Ferox Trout are highly sought after by anglers while their life-history strategy, which includes delayed maturation, multiphasic growth and extended longevity, is of interest to ecological and evolutionary modelers. However, despite their recreational and theoretical importance, little is known about the typical abundance of Ferox Trout or their vulnerability to angling. To rectify this situation a 16 year mark-recapture study was conducted on Loch Rannoch, which at 19 km2 is one of the largest lakes in the United Kingdom. A hierarchical Bayesian Jolly-Seber analysis of the data indicates that in 2009 the population of Ferox Trout in Loch Rannoch was approximately 69 individuals. The results also indicate that a single, often unaccompanied, highly-experienced angler was able to catch roughly 8% of the available fish on an annual basis. It is recommended that anglers adopt a precautionary approach and release all trout with a fork length ≥ 400 mm caught by trolling in Loch Rannoch.
    [Show full text]
  • Anadromy, Potamodromy and Residency in Brown Trout Salmo Trutta: the Role of Genes and the Environment
    Anadromy, potamodromy and residency in brown trout Salmo trutta: the role of genes and the environment Ferguson, A., Reed, T. E., Cross, T. F., McGinnity, P., & Prodohl, P. A. (2019). Anadromy, potamodromy and residency in brown trout Salmo trutta: the role of genes and the environment. Journal of Fish Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14005 Published in: Journal of Fish Biology Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2019 the authors. This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:30. Sep. 2021 Received: 13 March 2019 Accepted: 9 May 2019 DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14005 REVIEW PAPER FISH Anadromy, potamodromy and residency in brown trout Salmo trutta: the role of genes and the environment Andrew Ferguson1 | Thomas E.
    [Show full text]
  • Contrasting Growth Trajectories in Brown Trout (Salmo Trutta) Ecotypes Exhibiting Contrasting Life History Strategies Hughes, M
    Alternative routes to piscivory: Contrasting growth trajectories in brown trout (Salmo trutta) ecotypes exhibiting contrasting life history strategies Hughes, M. R., Hooker, O. E., Van Leeuwen, T. E., Kettle-White, A., Thorne, A., Prodöhl, P., & Adams, C. E. (2018). Alternative routes to piscivory: Contrasting growth trajectories in brown trout (Salmo trutta) ecotypes exhibiting contrasting life history strategies. ECOLOGY OF FRESHWATER FISH. https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12421 Published in: ECOLOGY OF FRESHWATER FISH Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:24. Sep. 2021 1 Alternative routes to piscivory: Contrasting growth trajectories in brown trout (Salmo 2 trutta) ecotypes exhibiting contrasting life history strategies 3 4 Martin R.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Title 1 Environmental Influences of Life History Strategies
    1 1 Title 2 Environmental influences of life history strategies in partial anadromous brown trout (Salmo 3 trutta, Salmonidae) 4 5 Running title 6 Life history of brown trout 7 8 Authors 9 Marie Nevoux1,2, Bengt Finstad3, Jan Grimsrud Davidsen4, Ross Finlay5, Quentin Josset6,2, 5 7 8 9 10 10 Russell Poole , Johan Höjesjö , Kim Aarestrup , Lo Persson , Oula Tolvanen & Bror 11 Jonsson11 12 13 Affiliations 14 1UMR ESE, Ecology and Ecosystem Health, Agrocampus Ouest, INRA, Rennes, France 15 2Management of Diadromous Fish in their Environment, AFB, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest 16 Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour UPPA, Rennes, France 17 3Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685 Torgarden, N-7485 Trondheim, 18 Norway 19 4NTNU University Museum, Department of Natural History, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway 20 5Marine Institute, Furnace, Newport, Co. Mayo, Ireland 21 6DRED, Direction de la Recherche, de l’Expertise et des données, AFB, Observatoire Long 22 Terme de la Bresle, rue des Fontaines 76260 Eu, France 23 7Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 24 Gothenburg, Sweden 25 8Technical University of Denmark, National Institute of Aquatic Resources 2 26 Vejlsoevej 39, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark 27 9Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural 28 Sciences, Umeå, Sweden 29 10 The Water Protection Association of the River Vantaa and Helsinki Region, 30 Ratamestarinkatu 7 b (3. krs), 00520 Helsinki, Finland 31 11Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Department of Landscape Ecology, Gaustadalléen 32 21, 0349 Oslo, Norway 33 3 34 Abstract 35 This paper reviews the life history of brown trout (Salmo trutta, Salmonidae) and factors 36 influencing decisions to migrate.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Arctic Char (Salvelinus Alpinus) and Lake Trout (Salvelinus Namaycush) in Lake Clark National Park, Alaska
    An Investigation of Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus) and Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in Lake Clark National Park, Alaska A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science with a Major in Fishery Resources in the College of Graduate Studies University of Idaho by Ryan Kreiner November 7, 2006 Major Professor: Dennis Scarnecchia, Ph.D. ii AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT THESIS This thesis of Ryan Kreiner, submitted for the degree of Master of Science with a major in Fishery Resources and titled “An Investigation of Two Resident Fish Species in Lake Clark National Park, Alaska: Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus) and Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush),” has been reviewed in final form. Permission, as indicated by the signatures and dates given below, is now granted to submit final copies to the College of Graduate Studies for approval. Major Professor _____________________________Date______________ Dennis Scarnecchia, Ph.D. Committee Members _____________________________Date______________ Katy Kavanagh, Ph.D. _____________________________Date______________ Chris Peery, Ph.D. _____________________________Date______________ Carol Ann Woody, Ph.D. Department Administrator _____________________________Date______________ Kerry Reese, Ph.D. Discipline's College Dean _____________________________Date_______________ Steven Daley Laursen, Ph.D. Final Approval and Acceptance by the College of Graduate Studies ______________________________Date_______________ Margrit von Braun, Ph.D. iii ABSTRACT Anadromous sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) are a keystone species for freshwater ecosystems, and in Lake Clark National Park, Alaska (LCNP), declines in salmon runs over the past 25 years have raised concerns about the health of resident fish species. Data on resident arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) and lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) growth and condition from six lakes within LCNP were collected in 2004 and compared with an historical information collected by Russell (1980) during the summers of 1978-79.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Genes Are Implicated in the Evolutionary Divergence of Sympatric Piscivorous and Insectivorous Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Jared A
    Grummer et al. BMC Ecol Evo (2021) 21:63 BMC Ecology and Evolution https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01795-9 RESEARCH Open Access Growth genes are implicated in the evolutionary divergence of sympatric piscivorous and insectivorous rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Jared A. Grummer1*, Michael C. Whitlock1, Patricia M. Schulte1 and Eric B. Taylor1,2 Abstract Background: Identifying ecologically signifcant phenotypic traits and the genomic mechanisms that underly them are crucial steps in understanding traits associated with population divergence. We used genome-wide data to identify genomic regions associated with key traits that distinguish two ecomorphs of rainbow trout (Oncorhyn- chus mykiss)—insectivores and piscivores—that coexist for the non-breeding portion of the year in Kootenay Lake, southeastern British Columbia. “Gerrards” are large-bodied, rapidly growing piscivores with high metabolic rates that spawn north of Kootenay Lake in the Lardeau River, in contrast to the insectivorous populations that are on average smaller in body size, with lower growth and metabolic rates, mainly forage on aquatic insects, and spawn in tributaries immediately surrounding Kootenay Lake. We used pool-seq data representing ~ 60% of the genome and 80 fsh per population to assess the level of genomic divergence between ecomorphs and to identify and interrogate loci that may play functional or selective roles in their divergence. Results: Genomic divergence was high between sympatric insectivores and piscivores ( FST 0.188), and in fact = higher than between insectivorous populations from Kootenay Lake and the Blackwater River ( FST 0.159) that are = > 500 km apart. A window-based FST analysis did not reveal “islands” of genomic diferentiation; however, the window with highest FST estimate did include a gene associated with insulin secretion.
    [Show full text]