PROLINE-CE WORKPACKAGE T2, ACTIVITY T2.2.1
IMPLEMENTATION OF BEST PRACTICES FOR WATER PROTECTION IN PILOT ACTIONS
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP REPORT
February, 2018
Lead Institution University of Ljubljana Contributor/s PP 4 Lead Author/s Jerca Praprotnik Kastelic, Barbara Čenčur Curk Date last release 6. 2. 2018
Contributors, name and surname Institution
Barbara Čenčur Curk, Jerca Praprotnik University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Natural Kastelic Sciences and Engineering (PP4) Primož Banovec, Matej Cerk, Ajda Cilenšek University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy (PP4) Branka Bračič Železnik Public Water Utility JP VO-KA (PP5) Joanna Czekaj, Mirosława Skrzypczak Górnośląskie Przedsiębiorstwo Wodociągów S.A. Gerhard Kuschnig Vienna Water, Municipal Department of the City of Vienna Roland Koeck University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Forest- and Soil Sciences, Institute of Silviculture Szilvia David, Magdolna Ambrus, Robert General Directorate of Water Management Hegyi Josip Terzić, Jasmina Lukač Reberski, Ivana Croatian Geological Survey, Department of Boljat, Tihomir Frangen, Ivona Baniček, Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Matko Patekar Daniel Bittner, Gabriele Chiogna, Markus Technical University of Munich; Chair of Disse Hydrology and River Basin Management Cinzia Alessandrini, Silvano Pecora, Giuseppe ARPAE Emilia Romagna Ricciardi, Valentina Dell’Aquila Norbert Jazwinski Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Elisabeth Gerhardt BFW - Federal Research Institution for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Date and Location of the Transnational Pilot Management Workshop ...... 1 2. Participants of the Transnational Pilot Management Workshop ...... 1 3. Workshop sessions ...... 2 3.1. Workshop opening session ...... 2 3.2. Workshop session: PA Presentations ...... 3 3.2.1. PA2.2 Presentation from Poland ...... 3 3.2.2. PA1.1 and PA1.2 Presentation from Austria ...... 4 3.2.3. PA2.1 Presentation from Slovenia ...... 4 3.2.4. PA2.3 Presentation from Hungary ...... 5 3.2.5. PA2.4.1 and PA 2.4.2 Presentation from Croatia ...... 5 3.2.6. PA2.6 Presentation from Germany ...... 5 3.2.7. PA3.1 Presentation from Italy ...... 5 3.2.8. PA3.2 Presentation from Hungary ...... 6 3.3. Expectatations concerning the outcomes of the activities in the pilot areas ...... 6
Annex 1 Agenda Annex 2 Participants list with signatures Annex 3 T2 – Pilot Actions Introductory presentation Annex 4 PA2.2 Water reservoir Kozłowa Góra Annex 5 PA1.1 Catchment area of the Vienna Water Supply Annex 6 PA1.2 Catchment area of Waidhofen Annex 7 PA2.1 Well field Dravlje valley in Ljubljana Annex 8 PA2.3 Tisza catchment area Annex 9 Groundwater protection in karst area: PA2.4.1 - South Dalmatia: Prud, Klokun and Mandina spring and PA2.4.2- Imotsko polje springs Annex 10 PA2.5 Neufahrn bei Freising Annex 11 PA3.1 Po river basin Annex 12 PA3.2 Along Danube Bend Annex 13 WPT3 leader expectiations of T2 Annex 14 WPT4 leader expectiations of T2
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
1. Date and Location of the Transnational Pilot Management Workshop
The Transnational Pilot Management Workshop for the PROLINE-CE project was held on October 17th, 2017, in Goczałkowice, Poland. The workshop was jointly organized by Polish project partners, National Water Management Authority and Silesian Waterworks PLC. The goal of the workshop was to present results of current activities on each Pilot Area with the description of the Pilot Area, best management practices and gaps identified in PA and planned activities for the future.
2. Participants of the Transnational Pilot Management Workshop
Invitation for the workshop with agenda (see Annex 1) was sent to all Project Partners. 45 participants took part in the workshop. Participants list is enclosed in Annex 2. Participants were from 7 Countries, representing 7 Project Partners and working on 10 different PAs: - Austria: PA1.1 Catchment area of the Vienna Water Supply and PA1.2 Catchment area of Waidhofen. - Slovenia: PA2.1 Well field Dravlje valley in Ljubljana. - Poland: PA2.2Water reservoir Kozłowa Góra. - Hungary: PA2.3 Tisza catchment area, PA3.2Along Danube Bend. - Croatia: PA2.4 Groundwater protection in karst areas in South Dalmatia: Prud, Klokun and Mandina spring and Imotsko polje springs. - Germany: PA2.5 Neufahrn bei Freising. - Italy: PA3.1 Po river basin.
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP 1
3. Workshop sessions
3.1. Workshop opening session
Welcoming words were given by Mr. Czopic, president of the Silesian Waterworks (ASP18) and by Mr. Hubert Siegel of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
Mrs. Barbara Čenčur Curk - as leader of Work-Package T2 and responsible for the Transnational Pilot Management Workshop - gave an overview of the pilot actions in the different clusters (Figure 1). In T2, the implementation and the feedback of the previous Work-Package T1 took place. The presentation is enclosed in Annex 3.
Figure 1: Introduction to workshop was held by Work-Package T2 leader, dr. Barbara Čenčur Curk
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP 2
3.2. Workshop session: PA Presentations and PMW Excursion
Main goal of the Transnational Pilot Management Workshop was to present results of the activity 2.1; therefore for each Pilot Action following deliverables were presented:
- short description of the pilot areas’ main characteristics (D.T2.1.4) with the main information, which is important to understand land use management and flood and drinking water management issues in PA;
- best management practices and gaps identified in PA (D.T.1.2);
- outcomes from 1st national stakeholder meeting (D.T1.3.2) - focus on BMPs and GAPs, land use, flood, drinking water management;
- planned activities (according to D.T2.1.5. guidelines): what will be done in PA, which BMPs will be studied and how (modelled, stakeholder involvement).
3.2.1. PA2.2 Presentation from Poland
The first pilot action presentation was held by the hosting partner from Poland, PP11 (PA2.2 Water reservoir Kozłowa Góra, by Joanna Czekaj). The presentation can be seen in Annex 4.
3.2.2. Pilot Management Workshop Excursion
After the presentation of Polnish Pilot Action an excursion to the water treatment plant, Goczałkowice reservoir dam and European bison (Polnish-zubr) farm (Figure 2) took place.
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP 3
Figure 2: Participants of the Transnational Pilot management Workshop in Katowice at European bison farm
3.2.3. PA1.1 and PA1.2 Presentation from Austria
Presentation from Austria was held by Mr. Roland Koeck. The first part of Presentation regarding PA1.1 Catchment area of the Vienna Water Supply was continued with the presentation of PA1.2 Catchment area of Waidhofen. The presentations can be seen in Annex 5 and 6.
3.2.4. PA2.1 Presentation from Slovenia
Slovenian pilot area was presented by Mrs. Barbara Čenčur Curk, with the title of PA2.1 Well field Dravlje valley in Ljubljana. The presentation can be seen in Annex 7.
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP 4
3.2.5. PA2.3 Presentation from Hungary
The first pilot action presentation from Hungary was held by Szilvia David with the title of PA2.3 Tisza catchment area. The presentation can be seen in Annex 8.
3.2.6. PA2.4.1 and PA 2.4.2 Presentation from Croatia
Presentation of Croatian pilot areas was held by Mr. Josip Terzić. Both PAs regarding Groundwater protection in karst area were presented: 2.4.1 - South Dalmatia: Prud, Klokun and Mandina spring and 2.4.2- Imotsko polje springs. The presentation can be seen in Annex 9.
3.2.7. PA2.6 Presentation from Germany
German pilot area was presented by Mr. Daniel Bittner (Figure 3). Pilot area is focused on Neufahrn bei Freising (PA2.5). The presentation can be seen in Annex 10.
Figure 3: Presentation of German PA held by Daniel Bittner
3.2.8. PA3.1 Presentation from Italy
The Italian pilot area was presented by Cinzia Alessandrini regarding PA3.1 Po river basin. The presentation can be seen in Annex 11.
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP 5
3.2.9. PA3.2 Presentation from Hungary
The second pilot action presentation from Hungary was held by Magdolna Ambrus, with the title of PA3.2 Along Danube Bend. The presentation can be seen in Annex 12.
3.3. Expectatations concerning the outcomes of the activities in the pilot areas
After Pilot Actions presentations, expectations of the leaders of WPT3 and WPT4 were presented, concerning the outcomes of the activities in the pilot areas and in general the WPT2 results.
The WPT3 leader, Mr. Norbert Jazwinski, specified that especially the functions and the conflicts in-between are needed and suggests to incorporate ecosystem services in best practices. The presentation can be seen in Annex 13.
The WPT4 leader, Mrs. Elisabeth Gerhardt, presented the WPT4 deliverables respectively outputs, which need the thematic input from WPT2, and general remarks concerning the content of WPT2 outcomes. WPT2 Leader agreed and only commented, that in addition to the planned second stakeholder workshop series (Output O.T.4.1; December 2018), workshops with local / regional stakeholders should be organised in each pilot area in March/April 2018 in order to elaborate D.T2.3.1 (Evaluation reports for each pilot action – acceptance of tested management practices among stakeholders). The presentation can be seen in Annex 14.
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP 6
ANNEX 1 Agenda
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
INVITATION
th date: October 17 , 2017 Version 02 venue: GOCZAŁKOWICE 02/10/2017
B. AGENDA – first draft
October 17th, 2017
EXCURSION AND FIRST TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP – TPM (D.T2.2.1) (preliminary agenda – times can slightly change)
08:00 DEPARTURE TO GOCZAŁKOWICE 09:00 – 10:00 - TPM content responsibility: PART 01 Transnational Pilot project leader/LP: welcome & Management Workshop (TPM): introduction - welcome WPT2-leader, PP4/UL: ppt
- introduction to WP T2 introduction to WP and organization and organization PPs fm Poland: ppt
- presentation of Polish PA - Pilot Actions Presentation (by PA responsibles) (max 20 min) content see below (part 2) 10:00 – 12:30 EXCURSION combination of visit of PP10, GPW treatment plant, Goczałkowice reservoir dam and cruise on small research boats of University of Silesia OR: Near to Goczałkowice is located the Nature Reserve "Żubrowisko" in Jankowice - the area of the population of the European bison protection. COFFEE BREAK INBETWEEN
IN PARALLEL 10:00 – 11:00 ASP-MEETING Discussion of the foreseen LP, PM, Associated Partners, WP- involvement of the ASPs as Leaders WPT1, WPT2, WPT3 „proof-readers“ of the project- (those persons will go on round 02 for the outputs (quality management) boat-trip)
LUNCH 12:30 – 13:30 14:00 – 18:00 - TPM content responsibility: PART 02 Transnational Pilot PA-responsibles: ppts
Management Workshop (TPM): Pilot Actions Presentation (max 20 presentation of pilot areas min. per PA) (by each PA responsible) THE FOLLOWING BULLET-POINTS HAVE TO discussion BE INCLUDED IN THE PP-PPTS:
expectations of T3 for T2 short description of the pilot results (by T3 leader) areas’ main characteristics expectations of T4 for T2 best management practices and results (by T4 leader) gaps in PA outcomes from 1st national stakeholder meeting planned activities(according to D.T2.1.5. guidelines)
WPT3 leader ppt with expectations of T3
for T2 results WPT4 leader ppt with expectation of T4
for T2 results
COFFEE BREAK INBETWEEN 18.30 RETURN TO KATOWICE EVENING TO BE CONFIRMED
SESSION 3 13:30 – 14:15 conclusion and overview of todos PM: ppt (concerning all WPs) 14:30 End of meeting
ANNEX 2 Participants list
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
ANNEX 3 T2 – Pilot Actions Introductory presentation
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
2/5/2018
Transnational Pilot Management workshop Katowice / 17.10.2017 T2 Pilots 2.2.1 Transnational pilot management workshop 1 PROLINE-CE / UL / doc. dr. Barbara Čenčur CurkTAKING COOPERATION FORWARD
T2 PARTNER'S INVOLVEMENT
1 BMLFUW - Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management 2 MA31 – Vienna Water - Municipality of the City of Vienna, MA31 3 MWY - Municipality of Waidhofen/Ybbs 4 UL - University of Ljubljana – RESPONSIBLE PARTNER 5 JP VO-KA - Public Water Utility JP VODOVOD-KANALIZACIJA Ljubljana 6 HOI - Herman Otto Institute 7 OVF - General Directorate of Water Management 8 HGI-CGS - Croatian Geological Survey 9 ARPAE - Regional Agency for Prevention, Environment and Energy in Emilia- Romagna 10 KZGW - National Water Management Authority 11 GPW - Silesian Waterworks PLC 12 HRBM - Technical University of Munich 13 CMCC - Euro-Mediterranean Centre on Climate Change Foundation TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 2/5/2018
T2 OBJECTIVES
Implementation & Review & Feedback from T1 - Best management practices for drinking water supply issues (State-of-the-art): - Best management practices and measures for drinking water protection - Sustainable land use (land use management) - Ecosystem services - Non-structural flood mitigation - ...
PILOT ACTIONS - verification regarding implementation status of best management practices for drinking water supply - identification of lacks: possibilities of improvement and implementation - preparing implementation strategies of best practices which are important for water protection and considering different ecosystem services
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
T2 OBJECTIVES
PILOT ACTIONS
- water supply management systems and best practices are strategically implemented in the pilot actions, in order to achieve a function-oriented land-use based spatial management for water protection at the operational level. - analyses and proposal of measures and actions concerning mitigation of extremes and achieving a sustainable drinking water level - elaboration of optimal measures and actions to achieve flood protection and a sustainable drinking water level as an input to the CE Transnational Guide towards an Optimal WAter REgime (GOWARE T3)
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 2/5/2018
T2 OBJECTIVES
PILOT ACTIONS - reflect the broad range of possible conflicts regarding drinking water protection, such as: forest ecosystem service function; land-use planning conflicts; flooding issues; impact of climate change and land-use changes - demonstration of effectiveness of measures including ecosystem services and economic efficiency
Water Provisioning Ecosystem Service Water Regulation Ecosystem Service Water Quality Regulation Ecosystem Service
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
T2 OBJECTIVES
PILOT ACTIONS Drinking water resources - pilot actions are clustered concerning their geographic
specification and natural site characteristics: Ecosystem services
- mountain forest and grassland sites CC - plain agriculture/grassland/wetland sites land use drought - special sites, e.g. dry areas, riparian strips Non-structural flood mitigation
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6
3 2/5/2018
ACT2.2 IMPLEMENTATION OF BEST PRACTICES FOR WATER PROTECTION IN PILOT ACTIONS
D.T2.2.1. Pilot implementation kick-off Transnational pilot management workshop Presentation of deliverables of ACT T2.1
Pilot actions presentations: short description of the pilot areas’ main characteristics (D.T2.1.4) best management practices and gaps in PA (D.T2.1.2) outcomes from 1st national stakeholder meeting (O.T1.1) planned activities (D.T2.1.5)
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7
T2 PILOT ACTION PRESENTATIONS
PILOT ACTION CLUSTER 1 PILOT ACTION CLUSTER 2 (PAC2) PILOT ACTION CLUSTER 3 (PAC1) Plain agriculture/ grassland/ wetland (PAC3) Mountain forest and sites Special sites (riparian strips) grassland sites
PAC1.1 Catchment area of PAC2.1 Well field Dravlje valley in PAC3.1 Po river basin, IT the Vienna Water Supply, Ljubljana, SI AT1 Drinking water source: Bank Drinking water source: Porous aquifer filtration Drinking water source: Karst aquifer PAC1.2 Catchment area of PAC2.2 Water reservoir Kozłowa Góra, PAC3.2 Along Danube Bend, Waidhofen/Ybbs, AT2 PL HU2 Drinking water source: Drinking water source: Surface water Drinking water source: Bank Fractured aquifer filtration PAC2.3 Tisza catchment area, HU1 Drinking water source: Surface water PAC2.4 Groundwater protection in karst area, HR 2.4.1 - South Dalmatia: Prud, Klokun and Mandina spring 2.4.2- Imotsko polje springs)
Drinking water source: Karst aquifer PAC2.5 Neufahrn bei Freising, GER Drinking water source: Porous aquifer TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 8
4
ANNEX 4 PA2.2 Water reservoir Kozłowa Góra
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
2/5/2018
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Goczałkowice, 17th October 2017
PAC2.2: KOZŁOWA GÓRA
1 PROLINE-CE | Silesian Waterworks PLC | JoannaTAKING Czekaj, COOPERATION Mirosława SkrzypczakFORWARD
OVERVIEW
1. Kozłowa Góra 2. Best 3. 1st National 4. Plan actions Pilot Action management Stakeholders characteristic practises in PA Workshop - Poland
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 2/5/2018
OVERVIEW
1. Kozłowa Góra 2. Best 3. 1st National 4. Plan actions Pilot Action management Stakeholders characteristic practises in PA Workshop - Poland
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
KOZŁOWA GÓRA PILOT ACTION LOCATION
• Drinking water supply ~50,000 m3/24h • Flood protection
Reasons: Algal bloom in summer time which make the water impossilbe to be a source of drinking water
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 2/5/2018
KOZŁOWA GÓRA PILOT ACTION MAIN CHARACTERISTICS
Feature Unit Value Kilometer of Brynica river in km 28+000 the dam cross-section Sub-basin surface area to km2 193.93 dam cross-section Normal water damming level m a.s.l. 278.08 (NPP) Capacity at normal water damming level 278.08 m hm3 12.389 a.s.l. Surface area at damming to km2 5.268 level 278.08 m a.s.l. Frontal dam height m 8.0 Width of frontal dam crest m 8.0 Frontal dam length m 1300 Maximum depth based on m 4.75 measurements Minimum depth based on m 0.00 measurements Average depth based on m 2.03 measurements
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
KOZŁOWA GÓRA PILOT ACTION MAIN CHARACTERISTICS
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6
3 2/5/2018
KOZŁOWA GÓRA PILOT ACTION LAND USE
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 8
4 2/5/2018
HYDROLOGICAL SETTINGS
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 9
RIVER DISCHARGE
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 10
5 2/5/2018
SURFACE WATER BODIES
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 11
INTEGRATED WATER BODIES
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 12
6 2/5/2018
WATER STATUS
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 13
GEOLOGICAL SETTINGS
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 14
7 2/5/2018
HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 15
MAJOR GROUNDWATER BODIES
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 16
8 2/5/2018
GW UTILIZATION
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 17
GW CHEMICAL STATUS
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 18
9 2/5/2018
SOIL SETTINGS
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 19
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 20
10 2/5/2018
POINT SOURCES OF POLLUTIONS
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 21
LINEAR SOURCES OF POLLUTION
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 22
11 2/5/2018
OVERVIEW
1. Kozłowa Góra 2. Best 3. 1st National 4. Plan actions Pilot Action management Stakeholders characteristic practises in PA Workshop - Poland
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 23
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTISES
Forests - non Agriculture – 20 BMP Urban / industrial – 15 BMP Flood mitigation – 5 BMP
No law regulation concerning BMP in forrests on the national level; small retention programme implemented in State Forest agency and Regional Offices of State Forest Codes of Good Agricultural Practices (Duer et al., 2004), and the activities outlined in the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 18th October 2016 on the Water management plan for the Vistula river basin. Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 18th October 2016 on the Water management plan for the Vistula river basin. Maintaining and operating instruction. Kozłowa Góra reservoir in Wymysłów and according to the guidelines of the Water Law Act of 18th July 2001
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 24
12 2/5/2018
OVERVIEW
1. Kozłowa Góra 2. Best 3. 1st National 4. Plan actions Pilot Action management Stakeholders characteristic practises in PA Workshop - Poland
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 25
1ST NATIONAL STAKEHOLDERS WORKSHOP – POLAND, KATOWICE, 24TH MAY 2017 over 60 participants: 29 stakeholders: representatives of Regional Water Management Authority, Polish Geological Survey, State Forests Katowice, Regional Environmental Agency Katowice, Regional Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management in Katowice, local water suppliers, district sanitary-epidemiological stations, local authorities
• 13 representatives of Project Partners PP10 and PP11, • 6 representatives of Associated Partners ASP18 • 13 external experts for GPW.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 26
13 2/5/2018
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 27
1. drinking tap water, 2. problem of water stagnation in the waterworks network and its influence on drinking water quality, 3. old, oversized and leaked waterworks network structure and its influence on drinking water quality, 4. water quality monitoring, 1. interest conflicts between administrator and responsible 5. effectiveness of the water authorities concerning flood protection charges, treatment, 2. gaps in prepared Water Law concerning responsibility and 6. drinking water quality regulations, charges for specific usage of water, 7. drinking water protection zones 3. possible influence of Climate Changes on water management, establishment 4. problem with small retention management, 8. interest conflicts between 5. good examples of historical water management network in administrator and responsible Pszyczna Forrest authorities concerning water 6. current actions of State Forrest concerning small retention resources protection charges TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 28
14 2/5/2018
STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK:
1. paying more attention to drinking tap water marketing – recommendation for drinking tap water instead of bottled water could cause paying more attention of society to protect water resources, 2. more control points on the waterworks network to define leakages and help network management, 3. establishment individual, higher quality requirements and environmental goals for WB which are drinking water resources, 4. definition of additional, stringent requirements for investment located in protective zones, 5. paying more attention to ecological education of society, 6. a need of an individual approach to land use and water management in drinking water protection zones 7. application of mathematical modelling to improve water resources management and, consequently, its quality 8. improve Water Law in context of specific water usage, 9. take lessons from historical documents due to water management– example of Pszczyna Forrest, 10. paying more attention and taking more actions due to small retention management in Forrests. TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 29
OVERVIEW
1. Kozłowa Góra 2. Best 3. 1st National 4. Plan actions Pilot Action management Stakeholders characteristic practises in PA Workshop - Poland
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 30
15 2/5/2018
FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES
Water Q & Q monitoring Reservoir’s water physicochemical characteristic mapping Identification of GW and SW pollution and its orgin Analysis of biotic elements status Identification of reservoir’s and inlets bottom sediments pollutions Analysis of fishery management
Analysis of WTP effectiveness
Hydrologic model
Ecological model
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 31
FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES
Water Q & Q status monitoring
• July 2017 – March 2018 • 2 series of SW quality monitoring • 2 series of GW quality monitoring Reservoir’s water physicochemical characteristic • 4 series of GW quantity monitoring mapping
• temperature, EC, pH, O2, nutrients, chlorides Identification of GW and SW • sampling with probe in 250x250 m pollution and its orgin resolution measuring grid • Pollution origin identification using • results interpolation isotopes
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 32
16 2/5/2018
Analysis of biotic elements status
• Phytoplankton quantity • Zooplankton quantity • Structure of fish population Identification of reservoir’s and • Structure of rush vegetation inlets bed sediments pollutions
• Phosphates, nitrates, heavy metals, pH Analysis of fishery management
• Influence of the fishery management on water state
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 33
Analysis of WTP effectiveness
• Detailed analysis of effectiveness of each stage of water treatment
Hydrological model
• SWAT model: using detailed soils data, land use data, meteorological data Ecological model • Simulations concerning influence of percipitation / slope / roughness on • Simulations concerning inflow / nutrients runoff concentrations/ phytoplankton biomass / zooplankton biomass / fishes biomass • Estimation of nutrients loads to reservoir • Integration of the models – ecological model uses outputs of hydrological model
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 34
17 2/5/2018
Any questions / suggestion?
Thank you for your attention!
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 35
Joanna Czekaj Silesian Waterworks PLC PROLINE-CE
www.gpw.Katowice.pl [email protected]
0048 503464629
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 36
18
ANNEX 5 PA1.1 Catchment area of the Vienna Water Supply
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
2/5/2018
Katowice, 16-18.October 2017 PAC1 Vienna Water, Austria
1 PROLINE-CE Vienna WaterTAKING COOPERATIONGerhardFORWARD Kuschnig
PAC1 VIENNA WATER, AUSTRIA
Location
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 2/5/2018
PAC1 VIENNA WATER, AUSTRIA
Protection Area Hochschwab (shaded)
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
PAC1 VIENNA WATER, AUSTRIA
Since 1994 a Karst research programme is in progress in the protection areas of Viennas water supply. Objective is to ensure the water supply for Vienna by describing the system and processes dominating the system in order to assess the risk and to implement measures in order to minimize the risk. Activities are mapping the environment, measuring meteorological and hydrological parameters and modelling the water cycle. Accomplished activities: • mapping of vegetation, soil and geology • set up of meteorological and hydrological measuring stations
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 2/5/2018
PAC1 VIENNA WATER, AUSTRIA
Activities in progress • Mapping and assessing hydrogeological relevant structures • Mapping and assessing infiltration • Evaluation and assessment of land use activities (pasture and forestry) • Mapping karstmorphological features • Documentation of caves • Modelling water cycle
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
PAC1 VIENNA WATER, AUSTRIA
Infiltration assessment Zeller Staritzen
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6
3 2/5/2018
PAC1 VIENNA WATER, AUSTRIA
Hydrogeology and tectonic structures
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7
PAC1 VIENNA WATER, AUSTRIA
Springs and water supply
Mean annual discharge Spring 2000-2012 [l/s]
Kläffer (KL) 5570
Höllbach (HO) 616
Pfannbauern (PF) 306
Brunngraben (BR) 328
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 8
4 2/5/2018
PAC1 VIENNA WATER, AUSTRIA
Thank you for your attention
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 9
5
ANNEX 6 PA1.2 Catchment area of Waidhofen
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
2/2/2018
Katowice, October 2017 – TM03
TPM: Lead Partner and PP 3 - Austria
1 PROLINE-CE TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM Pilot Action Waidhofen / Ybbs PAC 1.2 + PAC 1.2 is situated in the North-Eastern Calcareous Alps of Austria
+ The DWPZ covers an area of 1086 ha -precipitation 1300–1600 mm
+ Four mountain massifs with steep slopes characterize the DWPZ Elevation: 400 – 1000 m ASL
+ 25,000 people are supplied with the karstic spring water
+ The raw water can be directly supplied due to its high quality
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 2/2/2018
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
The Drinking Water Protection Zone (DWPZ) of PAC 1.2, Waidhofen/Ybbs
1086 ha
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
Main Land Use types in PAC 1.2
+ 78.4 % Forestry + 15 % Grasslands + 1.7 % Stone Quarries + 4.9 % Urban Areas
+ Forestry is the dominant land use type, which also exerts crucial influence on water supply.
+ Hence it is in the focus of interest in PROLINE-CE.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 2/2/2018
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
GAPS in Pilot Action 1.2
+ Application of the clear cut technique within the DWPZ
+ Unnaturally elevated wild ungulate densities
+ Extensive forest road construction
+ Plantation of conifer species
+ Reduction of the natural gene reserves
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6
3 2/2/2018
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 8
4 2/2/2018
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
Best Practices, especially suitable for PAC 1.2
+ Avoidance of the Clear-Cut technique + Establishment of a Continuous Cover Forest System + Prevention of browsing damages (wild ungulates) + Tree species diversity according to the Forest Hydrotope Type (European beech, etc.) + Avoidance of new forest road constructions + In special cases renaturation of existing forest roads + Protection of huge, old and stable tree individuals (gene pool)
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 9
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
Outcomes of the 1st national stakeholder workshop In the course of the Austrian 1st Stakeholder Workshop, several themes with relevance for PAC1.2 were discussed:
+ Bad practices with impacts on water protection and flood prevention were listed by the participants
+ All bad practices relevant in Waidhofen/Ybbs were part of the discussion
+ All participants agreed upon the negative impacts of those bad practices on water protection and flood prevention
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 10
5 2/2/2018
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
Outcomes of the 1st national stakeholder workshop Participants rated following activities as most important solution strategies: + Bundling function for several authorities involved in water related thematic challenges
+ Best Practice brochures for private forest owners
+ Implementation of the Forest Hydrotope Model specifications for forest sites -> Natural tree species diversity
+ Comprehensive execution of the Austrian Federal Forest Act
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 11
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
Planned Activities
+ Round Table for the Infrastructure-Committee of the Municipality of Waidhofen/Ybbs
+ Information and knowledge-transfer for the involved stakeholders (forest owners) – individual conversations
+ Knowledge transfer for the Austrian Federal Forest Enterprise
+ Field excursions for the forest owners, show-casing Best Practices
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 12
6 2/2/2018
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
Planned Activities
+ Best Practice Summary, comprehensible version for forest owners
+ Negotiations with forest owners within the context of “Payments for Ecosystem Services” (Incentives for the application of Best Practices)
+ Intended is the coverage for all forest owners within the DWPZ
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 13
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
Conclusions
+ The Pilot Action PAC 1.2 Waidhofen/Ybbs: Several insights into processes regarding water protection and flood prevention
+ The Best Practice implementation will need efforts: Resistance of forest owners and local authorities in continuing bad practices
+ Incentives for the application of Best Practices as solution
+ Information and Knowledge transfer campaigns for all involved stakeholders
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 14
7 2/2/2018
KATOWICE 2017 - TPM
Thank you for your attention!
DI Dr. Roland Koeck
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna – Austria Department of Forest- and Soil Sciences Institute of Silviculture www.boku.ac.at [email protected]
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 15
8
ANNEX 7 PA2.1 Well field Dravlje valley in Ljubljana
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
2/14/2018
Transnational Pilot Management workshop Katowice / 17.10.2017
PA 2.1 – Well field Dravlje valley in Ljubljana
1 PROLINE-CE / UL & JP VO-KA / doc. dr. BarbaraTAKING Čenčur COOPERATIONCurk & others FORWARD
PA 2.1 – WELL FIELD DRAVLJE VALLEY IN LJUBLJANA
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 2/14/2018
PA 2.1 – LAND USE & FLOODS
Land use in PAA Surface waters and flooding areas map
Surface area Share (km2) (%) Land use Artificial surfaces 5.125 30.79% Agricultural areas 3.476 20.87% Forest and semi natural areas 8.053 48.34% TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
PA 2.1 – DWPZ & HYDROGEOLOGY
Hydrogeological map (IAH) Drinking water protection zones
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 2/14/2018
PA 2.1 – AREAS WITH RESTRICTIONS
Protected areas map Natural heritage map
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
PA 2.1 – GAPs & BMPs
Forest Advantages: - fertilization is not allowed due to DWPZ - due to urban forest no clear cuts or timber productions are present Challenges: - dominance of tourism over forest protection
Grassland Advantages: - enhancing and preserving drinking water sources Challenges: - diminishing applications of fertilizers in the period, when it is not allowed - establishing control over the purchased and used quantity of fertilizers
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6
3 2/14/2018
PA 2.1 - GAPs & BMPs
Agriculture Advantages: - regular inspections and supervision carried out by the Inspectorate of the RS for Agriculture, Forestry, Food and the Environment for farmers in the sustainable agriculture programe - subsidies for limitations for use of fertilizers and pesticides in DWPZ1 Challenges: - establishing control on use of fertilizers in the time ban - establishing control of the purchased and used quantity of fertilizers - establishing control of storages of manure and slurry (sealing, quantities, etc.)
Protected areas Advantages: - limited activities in nature parks for the protection of nature Challenges: - inspection of activities in nature parks TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7
PA 2.1 – GAPs & BMPs
Urban areas (settlements) Advantages: - existing local sewage system Challenges: - establishing of control of local sewage condition - establishing of control of septic tanks (quantities, cleaning etc.)
Industrial areas Advantage: - internal control of waste and exhausts Challenge: Type of connection No. of people No. of - establishing of control of activities impacting on households Sewage system 20494 3250 environment and waters Individual WWTP 84 23 Septic tank 1676 478 Total 22256 3751 TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 8
4 2/14/2018
PA 2.1 – GAPs & BMPs
Transport units Advantages: - arranged road rainwater discharge on motorway and some main roads Challenges: - to prevent excessive use of solvents in winter - to prevent application of fertilizers on the roadsides - to collect and to control road rainwater discharge, particularly in the area of planned Koseze Waterworks
Flood management Advantages: - flood protection area with measures and limitations Challenges: - monitoring of flood events and permanent validation of flood hazard maps TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 9
PA 2.1 – 1st NAT. STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
Participants of the Start-up stakeholder workshop in Slovenia 36 participants: - 6 from governmental agencies: Slovenian Environment Agency, Water Agency, Nature protection agency; - 1 from Governmental inspectorate for the environment and spatial planning; - 3 Municipalities: Ljubljana, Cerklje na Gorenjskem, Škofja Loka; - 4 Public Water Utilities: Ljubljana, Domžale, Kranj, Krško; - 2 NGO’s: GWP CEE and GWP Slovenia; - 1 University – research institution; - 4 SME’s and research institutions dealing with water and spatial planning. Interactive stakeholder dialogue - 3 groups: 1. The challenges of drinking water protection regarding land use management 2. Flood management and protection of drinking water resources; measures and practices 3. Past extreme weather events affecting drinking water supply - specific experiences of interruption in drinking water supply and threats
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 10
5 2/14/2018
PA 2.1 – 1st NAT. STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
Topic 1 – The challenges of drinking water protection regarding land use management
- Violations of restrictions and prohibitions inside DWPZ on the quality of groundwater in the DWPZ1 – purchase of parcels in the DWPZ1 - The problem of obtaining administrative permits - without measures inspection agency does not have basis for actionn, - Poor communication between individual stakeholders - No limits on sold quantities of pesticides when buying it with a certificate - No sewage system of small wastewater treatment plants, they are prohibited in the DWPZ - Lack of people‘s manners towards the environment, they are still dumping waste in the DWPZ, digging gravel, etc. - Inspection services are under-staffed and have very limited power TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 11
PA 2.1 – 1st NAT. STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
Topic 2 – Flood management and protection of drinking water resources; measures and practices
Constructive - Sealed wells heads - to prevent the surface water intrusion in the well. - Flood prove facilities with installations above flood level: pumping stations, electrical installations, storage of pollutants (heating oil tanks, production process, SEVESO, etc.) - Sewage in flood zones - the problem of flooding and sewage interaction.
Non-structural - Land use management: use of permanent grassland in flood area. - Close cooperation in urban planning among key stakeholders: investors, flood management, protection of drinking water sources.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 12
6 2/14/2018
PA 2.1 – 1st NAT. STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
Topic 3 – Past extreme weather events affecting drinking water supply - specific experiences of interruption in drinking water supply and threats
- Climate change awareness – most Municipalities no adaptation program. - Drought and flood - Water utility of Ljubljana no safety plan. - No reserve drinking water source in case of pollution – most water supplies rely of one larger well field. - Higher temperatures of the supply pipelines during summer – need of assessment of impact on water temperature, water levels and water quality. - Delineation of DWPZs with regard to extreme events (drought, flood) - Drinking water priority in case of drought - reduction for other water uses (irrigation, industry…) has to be determined for each water source. - Joint irrigation plan for agricultural areas - small private land owners are not willing to cooperate. - Water for irrigation from the water supply upon special price. - Flooding areas - change from building land to open space for flooding - A problem of illegal waste disposals, which can be flooded. TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 13
PLANNED ACTIVITIES
→ Hydrological/hydraulical and hydrogeological modelling of climate change scenarios daily precipitation and temperature data.
→ Hydrological model of hinterland waters for estimation of water quantities for proper design of surface water discharge.
→ survey of condition of manure and slurry storages and its sealings at the local farms & fertilizers and manure application
→ Organizing regular interactive workshops with local stakeholders and informing local population through public events, media and brochures.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 14
7 2/14/2018
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 15
8
ANNEX 8 PA2.3 Tisza catchment area
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
2/5/2018
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Katowice, 16th–18th October 2017
PA2.3 Tisza Catchment Area
PROLINE-CE / General Directorate of Water ManagementTAKING COOPERATION /Szilvia David, FORWARDMagdolna Ambrus and1 Robert Hegyi
DRINKING WATER SOURCES - HUNGARY
In Hungary the 95% of the abstracted drinking water is from groundwater.
Drinking water abstractions from surface water are rare, this Pilote Area focuses on 2 of this. Abstarction of the city Szolnok is located along Tisza river and waterwork Balmazújváros along Keleti Irrigation Channel. These waterworks are amongst the most significant surface drinking water suppliers. Others are lokated on Lake Balaton (7), DW reservoirs (5) and smaller streams (5). (In total 19 surface WWs exist.)
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 2/5/2018
TIKEVIR – WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
The water system of the Hungarian Great Plain was significantly changed from the 19th century. Dykes stopped floods and created huge arable lands without the risk of being flooded.
The disappeared little water courses depending on flood were substituted by channels – that often follow old river beds. The channels are supplied by Tisza water, from two Tisza reservoirs. This system allows the safe water supply of the 2 Pilote Areas. TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
Flood issues
Floods in the Tisza River Basin can occur at any season as a result of rainstorm, snowmelt or the combination of the two. The warm period from May to October accounts for nearly 65% of total floods. Large floods on the Tisza, can last for as long as 100 days or more. This is due to the very flat characteristic of the river.
Two areas of the historical floodplain are worth mentioning, the deepening around Szolnok and the Puszta of Hortobagy.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 2/5/2018
Protected areas – EU WFD
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
Land use
The highest rate is represented by the: • non-irrigated arable land (61,93%), • Natural grassland (9,85%) • pasture (9,66%) • broad-leaved forest (4,26%) • discontinuous urban fabric (3,62%,), • .
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6
3 2/5/2018
DROUGHT
The PA often suffers from drought and water scarcity. Mainly Szolnok WW is affected where the water abstraction depends on the water level. The reservoir of Kisköre (Tisza-tó) offers solution for the problem while the impoundment also has to supply with water irrigation channels and touristical aims.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7
Surface drinking water resources in Szolnok
Surface Waterwork of the city Szolnok is situated in the north-eastern border of Szolnok, on the right riverside of the Tisza. The capacity of the waterwork is 50 000 m3/d, and it supplies Szolnok and 7 of its surrounding settlements.
Alcsi Holt – Tisza (an oxbow lake) reserves drinking water which – in qualitative aspects - is independent from the Tisza. It is activated in case of havaria. The capacity is 30 000 m3/d.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 8
4 2/5/2018
Balmazújváros – Keleti Irrigation Channel Surface Waterwork
• It is situated on the south-eastern part of the city, on the left side of the Keleti Irrigation Channel which is an elevated channel (conducted above the see level of the surrounding area). • The capacity of the waterworks is 30 000 m3/d, the treated water is 13 000 m3/d. • 5 settlements are supplied with exclusively treated SW. Debrecen (the second most populated Hungarian city with 200 000 inhabitants) is supplied with mixed water (SW and GW). • The water abstraction work hasn’t got a deliniated and assigned DWPZ, but due to the Channel’s conditions (elevated channel without waste water inlets) it can be considered as relatively protected. • The main danger source might be a pollution from the River Tisza, e.g. heavy metals. • The surface water is rich in nutrients. Drinking water production needs multiple steps of purification. TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 9
Balmazújváros – Keleti Irrigation Channel Surface Waterwork
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 10
5 2/5/2018
Drinking water protective zones
Protection is understood to mean the determination, designation, establishment and maintenance of a protective block or area or zone.
Government Regulation defines the criteria of water protection zones:
• The inner protective zone: protection of the abstraction works and the water supplies from direct pollution and damage,
• The outer protective zone: protection against refractory, further bacterial and other decomposable pollutants.
Rivers and other streams Protective area Q95 < 50 m3/s Q95 > 50 m3/s 200 m upstream and 20 m downstream of the abstraction pont (the Inner zone - on water surface downstream distance is 50 m on sections with flow velocity less than 0.5 m/s, disturbed, or backflow) 50 m on each side of the intake For intakes less than 50 m from the LLW (lower low water) along bank: Inner zone - on bank side 20 m wide strip beyond the HHW (heigher high water) along bank
Outer zone - on water surface 5 km upstream of the abstraction 2 km upstream of the abstraction From the HHW along bank 200 m From the HHW along bank 200 m Outer zone - on land wide up to 1 km, 100 m wide up to wide up to 0.5 km. 2 km upstream of the intake. TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 11
Drinking water protective zones of Szolnok waterworks
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 12
6 2/5/2018
POSSIBLE FOREST COVER OF HUNGARY
Not suitablefor forest or swards Suitable only for forests Suitable only for swards Suitable for both, forest is more likely Suitable for both, sward is more likely Suitable for both evenly
http://greenfo.hu/hirek/2017/09/23/uj-terkepekkel-a-hatekonyabb-termeszetvedelemert http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.12564/abstract
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 13
Best Management Practices Forest Advantages • The Tisza floodplain between levees is covered by forests. (However owners are different : nature parks, private owners, forestry.) • Protective forest management and afforestation. • Forestry administration and control is present. • Agro-environmental payments under Rural Development Programme fosters afforestation along waters and arable land as protective forests prevents leaching of agricultural pollution • soil and water protection functionality of forest ecosystems increasing water infiltration; reducing and slowing runoff; erosion
Challenges • Establishment of agro-forestry systems (grazing) and wood-pastures Prohibition or restriction of grazing in forests? • Ensure up-to-date knowledge transfer • Control and clear legislative background to reach sustainable forest management. • Flood protection and forest on floodplain. •
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 14
7 2/5/2018
Best Management Practices Forests - river bed - floodplain
Tisza-Szolnok upstream
River bed is deepening and narrowing, while the floodplain between levees suffers from aggregating sediment, flood levels are getting higher. Best practices for floodplain forests taking into account flood issues, nature protection and drinking water supply are needed. Tisza-Szolnok downstream
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 15
Best Management Practices Grassland
Advantages • Natural grassland covers nearly 10% of the PA where the selection of the appropriate management type is ensured • Grassland may reduce quantitative and qualitative vulnerability of groundwater and surface water resources by retaining water, filtering and attenuating pollutants, • Appropriate grazing is supported by the nature park.
Challenges • Additional areas could be used as grassland, change of land use to be promoted.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 16
8 2/5/2018
Best Management Practices
Agriculture Urban areas Advantages Advantages Well formulated rules for • Existing sewage systems and waste water • DW protection zones, treatment plants. • good practices regarding farming and production methods compatible with Challenges sustainable use of environment, and • Control of water quality downstream the • the application of manure, fertilisers WWTP, and assessment of river capacity against loading. • and pesticides. • Continue to invest into sewage systems and Challenges waste water treatment plants. • Need of professional knowledge, • Set up of individual waste water treatment • High costs, plants for individual houses mainly in small settlements. • Effectiveness of measures is difficult to measure. • Implementation of rainwater management. • Promotion of NWRMs is essential.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 17
Best Management Practices Wetlands
Advantages • High number and large areas of wetlands are on the PA: Hortobagy Nature Park and floodplain forests of the Tisza river. • Nature parks have high interest in environmental friendly maintenance of these areas and often act as owner.
Challenges • Floodplain forests and other natural land covers are adversely affecting flood levels and the most simple way to reduce flood risk is the removal of these forests. Promotion of NWRMs and best available technics is essential.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 18
9 2/5/2018
PLANNED ACTIVITIES
• Hydraulical/hydrological and hydrogeological modelling of climate change - time series analysis.
• Assesment of grazing effects in forests, and of plant regulation on floodplain. Direct cooperation with local stakeholders. Evaluation of good practices on pilot areas.
• Create drought forecast and drought -protection measures for waters acheaving more effective drought management. Proposal project activitiy:
• Assesment of floodplain forests, their role in water resource protection.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 19
CONCLUSIONS
1. The PA is a plain area, the River Tisza is the main water supplier.
2. The main land use is agriculture; grasslands and pastures, floodplains are covered by broad-leaved forest.
3. The most important pollutions come from the upper catchments (e.g. arable land, solid waste, heavy metals).
4. On the PA drought and water scarcity is a real problem in dry periods.
5. A conflict of interest occur amongst agriculture, nature protection, forestry, flood protection and the goals of the WFD. Stakeholder consultations are of high importance.
6. Sustainable flood defense systems on plain areas should be reconsidered.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 20
10 2/5/2018
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
General Directorate of Water Management Department of River Basin Management PROLINE-CE www.ovf.hu; www.vizugy.hu [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] +00 06 1 225 4400 TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 21
11
ANNEX 9 PA2.4 Groundwater protection in karst areas in South Dalmatia: PA2.4-1 Prud, Klokun and Mandina spring & PA2.4.2- Imotsko polje springs
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
2/5/2018
Transnational meeting 03 Katowice, Poland, October 16th –18th, 2017 D T 2.1. Pilot Actions: Imotsko polje springs; South Dalmatia - Prud, Klokun and Mandina mlinica spring PROLINE-CE PP 8, HGI-CGS TerzićTAKING Josip, COOPERATION Lukač ReberskiFORWARD Jasmina, Boljat Ivana,1 Frangen Tihomir, Baniček Ivona, Patekar Matko
Pilot Action basic Best 1st National Set-up of pilot- data management stakeholder specific practices and workshop management gaps in Pilot outcomes practices Action
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 2/5/2018
INTRODUCTION
• Typical karst catchments (karst aquifers and springs) characterized by very complex and intricate hydrogeological features
• Quality and quantity monitoring limited
• Seasonal flooding of karst fields
• Transboundary issues– sanitary protection zones
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
PILOT ACTION IMOTSKO POLJE SPRINGS – basic data
Complex geological, lithological, hydrogeological and climatological conditions
Vrljika River, Ričina, partly regulated watercourse Suvaja and channel Sija Springs Opačac, Jauk, Utopišće, Duboka Draga Ričica accumulation Wetland area Prološko Blato Crveno and Modro Lake Land use: forests, agricultural land and vineyards prevail Planned irrigation system (68% of Imotsko field)
Flooding: a regulation of the Water supply system Imotska Vrljika segment, reconstruction krajina (85% built), Opačac of the Pećnik tunnel and spring and Vrljika River regulation of the Trebižat River Urban wastewater treatment (downstream of Imotsko polje) plant (utilizes only 8%) are required.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 2/5/2018
PILOT ACTION IMOTSKO POLJE SPRINGS – MAIN CONFLICTS / GAPS
Intensive agricultural activity which will expand even further after the planned water supply and melioration system is constructed
Ineffective drainage system Occasional field flooding
Large water suplly losses (around 80% of water is lost due to poor supply network infrastructure, making this the worst supply area in Local community not the country) willing to take advices or implement practices Inadequate or no that differe from the implementation of spatial plans, tradicional ones Illegal waste dumps illegal and unplanned construction
Climate predictions for the period from 2021 – 2050 point to the possibility of great loss of water resources
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES – IMOTSKO POLJE SPRINGS
• further construction and maintenance of • Reconstruction of waterworks, water supply system, water drainage pumping stations of Banja and WATER system and sewage system will have Butina in the area of the town of MANAGEMENT cumulative positive impacts on the Vrgorac as the most important protection of water resources (surface URBAN drinking water springs of the water as well as groundwater) AREAS area • Reconstruction and construction • continuous afforestation that offers a of sewerage network and chance to expand the existing biodiversity; drainage facilities in the county great forest cover (47.5%) with dominantly FORESTS productive forest land provides a clear frame for forestry that helps secure the INDUSTRIAL • Eudcative workshops - increased water protection functionality of forest AREAS environmental awareness ecosystems • Set up of numerous recycling islands and facilities over the • Conversion prohibition of grasslands and coming period GRASSLAND pastures • declaration of protected areas under various EU and national • Increase in organic food production; a WETLAND projects more sustainable use of pesticides; dry • Important role in in water AGRICULTURE stone wall building to stop soil erosion; storage, groundwater recharge subsidies for farmers and land owners and reduction of down-stream runoff
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6
3 2/5/2018
PILOT ACTION SOUTH DALMATIA – basic data
Complex geological, lithological, hydrogeological and climatological conditions Matica River, Matica Rastoka Prud, Klokun, Mandina springs Baćina Lakes
Land use: transitional woodland- shrubs, agriculture areas with significant areas of natural vegetation, sclerophyllous vegetation and natural grasslands Rastok and Krotuša tunnels drain the water from Rastok and Vrgorac field, but flood Biological water treatment plant prevention is not effective – in Prud in and construction of planned new drainage tunnel new sewage system is in progress (drainage from Vrgorac field to Brina lake) Regional water supply system NPKL (only 10% of minimum capacity is used)
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7
PILOT ACTION SOUTH DALMATIA – MAIN CONFLICTS / GAPS
Intensive agricultural activity in the Vrgorac Field and in the Neretva Local community not River valley willing to take advices or implement practices that differe from the Not adequately resolved drainage of karst fields (Rastok, Vrgorac tradicional ones field, Imotski field). Regardless of numerous construction interventions (construction channel and tunnel for drainage of surplus water from the flooded fields), fields still occasionally flood
A a lot of deficiencies in the sewerage and wastewater drainage system, insufficient connection to the sewerage network Cummulative effect of Inadequate or no The majority of the springs negative impacts implementation of spatial plans, still do not have any illegal and unplanned defined or established construction sanitary protection zones
Illegal waste dumps
Climate predictions for the period from 2021 – 2050 point to Large and medium annual the possibility of great loss of flows tend to decrease water resources
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 8
4 2/5/2018
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES – SOUTH DALMATIA
• further construction and maintenance of • important factors in water water supply system, water drainage storage, groundwater recharge WATER system and sewage system; construction and reduction of down-stream MANAGEMENT of water treatment plants; monitoring WETLAND runoff system of water salinization of Neretva • Protection in selected River designated sites • Evaluation of potential • afforestation of forest land damaged due cumulative impacts on water to natural hazards (forest fires and floods) regime FORESTS helps to secure water protection functionality of forest ecosystems and decrease soil erosion INDUSTRIAL • Eudcative workshops - increased AREAS environmental awareness • recycling islands, separate waste • Revegetation of degraded grassland areas collecting, remediation of illegal GRASSLAND surface runoff and soil erosion will landfills decresed
• Education of farmers on sustainable use of pesticides; increased organic AGRICULTURE agricultural production; implemented soil monitoring system and soil remediation due to floods and erosion.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 9
1ST NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP OUTCOMES
• Involvement of various target groups comprised of authorities, experts, decision makers and broad public
• Pilot action specific issues regarding land use management pratices and water resources protection, along with existing measures of flood prevention were presented
• Interdisciplinary discussion with present stakeholders
• The need for systematic and long term approach, clear development strategies
• Education and rising awareness of stakeholders as a prerequisite for the acceptance of new ideas and approaches
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 10
5 2/5/2018
SET-UP OF PILOT-SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
• Implementation strategies: Organizing workshop with local stakeholders, Informing local population through media and brochures.
• Climate changes will be projected using several regional climate models (RCM), namely Aladin, RegCM3 and Promes. For the present climate, models are compared with the local DHMZ observations and with the EOBS gridded temperature and precipitation data.
• The project duration is too short for measures to be implemented and tested, but measures can be proposed and tested after their implementation. Also, our institution is not competent to implement measures, we can only suggest and warn about the noticed gaps.
• We expect that the research we will carry out under the PROLINE-CE project in this pilot area will get new insight into the impact of climate change on the quantity and quality of groundwater in this area which will help the future planning of water management.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 11
SET-UP OF PILOT-SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
BMP planned to be implemented in PA Imotsko BMP planned to be implemented in PA South polje springs Dalmatia
Enhanced water quality monitoring Enhanced water quality monitoring
Sanctions in case of non-compliance with the Improving of sanctions in case of non- water protection regulations compliance with the water protection regulations Strengthen control of the implementation of Strengthen control of the implementation of prescribed measures prescribed measures Transition from a conventional to ecological Transition from a conventional to ecological agriculture agriculture Planning of non-structural flood Planning of non-structural flood protection measures protection measures Insufficiently effective drainage system that needs to be reconstructed and expanded
Improved water management
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 12
6 2/5/2018
CONCLUSION
THANK YOU FOR THE ATTENTION!
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 13
Josip Terzić Head of the Department of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Croatian Geological Survey PP8
http://www.hgi-cgs.hr/ [email protected]
+38516160888
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 14
7
ANNEX 10 PA2.5 Neufahrn bei Freising
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
2/5/2018
Project meeting in Katowice | October 16th – 18th, 2017
PA - Neufahrn bei Freising (Germany)
PROLINE-CE | TU Munich | PP12 TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 1 Daniel Bittner, Prof. Dr. Gabriele Chiogna, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Markus Disse
LOCATION
- ca. 15 km north of Munich - ca. 19.000 inhabitants - local water supply regional association - 63.000 inhab. supplied - 75 % of water supplied are extracted from well field Neufahrn - study area (ca. 50 km²) is considered to represent the recharge area
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 2/5/2018
HYDRO(METEOROLOGY)
- Isar river flowing through the study area - river discharge heavily affected by river diversion to the Mittlere-Isar-Kanal
blue: Isar river gauge Freising black: Isar river gauge Munich
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
HYDRO(METEOROLOGY)
blue: Isar river gauge Freising black: Isar river gauge Munich
mean annual temperature: 9.1°C mean annual precipitation: 762 mm
(averaged from 1993 – 2016 at DWD meteo station Munich airport)
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 2/5/2018
(HYDRO)GEOLOGY
- alpine foreland, sedimentary basin of the Alpine orogene
- two aquifers: - Quarternary (upper aquifer, unconsolidated, glaciofluvial (terrace) sediments from Pleistocene + Holocene alluvial deposits) - Tertiary (Upper Freshwater Molasse, partially cemented, almost sandy sediments)
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
FLOOD ISSUES
- treatment plants should not be affected by surface water flood events - possible impact through increase of gw levels as response to flood impulse (under investigation)
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6
3 2/5/2018
WELL FIELD NEUFAHRN
- well field Neufahrn comprises: - 6 deep wells (dw supply) - 3 shallow wells (process water for research centre Garching) - protected area: 1.8 km² (only related to the deep wells) - mean water extraction from deep wells: ca. 580 l/s - considered annual recharge: ca. 350 mm recharge area has to cover 52.3 km² to satisfy the demand
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7
LAND USE based on CLC2012:
- 45 % arable land - 21 % settlement structures - 18 % forests - 13 % pastures
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 8
4 2/5/2018
LAND USE
LfStat (2016) predominant crop types on arable land in study area:
- 60 % grain farming (wheat, winter and spring barley) - 15 % winter oilseed rape - 13 % maize - 3.6 % potatoes
LfStat (2016) + stakeholder interviews: potatoe farming decreased significantly during last decades due to closure of ‚Pfanni‘ productions in Munich loss of profitability due to changing opportunities for younger generations TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 9
LIVESTOCK FARMING
LfStat (2016)
Generally:
- decreasing amount of pastoralists - decreasing amount of livestock especially cattle livestock decreased since the early 90‘s according to stakeholder interviews
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 10
5 2/5/2018
BMP’S?
What are BMP‘s in our pilot area? observed: decreasing nitrate concentrations in the shallow wells knowledge: Described changes based on local statistics and stakeholder interviews
What particular change(s) caused the decreasing nitrate trend? How strong are both aquifers interconnected and do land use changes potentially affect the lower aquifer as well? How does the Isar river discharge affect the local groundwater dynamics and how does the river diversionTAKING COOPERATIONaffect thoseFORWARDprocesses?11
INVESTIGATIONS currently ongoing:
• Integration of workshop outcomes into a Bavarian online survey • Investigating the nature of the driving factors for BMP selection in Bavaria using different parameters for spatial clustering Stakeholder workshop in Munich, May 3rd, 2017 • Numerical modeling of the groundwater flow in the recharge area of the Neufahrn well field
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 12
6 2/5/2018
INVESTIGATIONS planned:
• collection of missing data (e.g. CC, past land use) • validation of the numerical model • stakeholder engagement and local survey • time series analysis of
water quantity and water Stakeholder workshop in Munich, May 3rd, 2017 quality data • investigating the surface water (Isar) – groundwater interactions (if possible, additional funding needed) • implementation of alternative BMP‘s into the numerical model
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 13
Thanks for your attention
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 14
7
ANNEX 11 PA3.1 Po river basin
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
2/5/2018
Transnational Meeting 03 Katowice, October 16th-18th, 2017
PA - Po river basin (Italy)
PROLINE-CE | Arpae Emilia Romagna | Cinzia AlessandriniTAKING COOPERATION, Silvano PecoraFORWARD, Giuseppe Ricciardi1 , Valentina Dell‘Aquila
PO RIVER BASIN GENERAL FRAMEWORK
•Catchment Area 70.090 km2 •Main river length 652 km •Minimum daily discharge at Pontelagoscuro 168 m3/s •Maximum discharge at Pontelagoscuro 12.300 m3/s •Mean annual discharge at Pontelagoscuro 1.510 m3/s •Basin average quote 740 m a.s.l. •Delta area 380 km2
Pontelagoscuro
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 2/5/2018
METEO-CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICS
Average annual precipitation (mm) in Sub-basins of Po river basin
Average annual temperature (°C) in Sub-basins of Po river basin
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
HYDROMETEOROLOGY
Po river basin area plays a huge role at environmental, economical, agricultural and industrial level and because of its role it is often object of sector studies which means a spread Meteorological stations and rivergauges network and also one of the oldest water level gauge time series (Pontelagoscuro)
Meteorological stations in Po river Basin( FEWS screenshot)
River gauges in Po river Basin( FEWS screenshot)
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 2/5/2018
LAND USE
The P-RB comprises Italy’s largest lowland, suitable for agricolture Almost entire national production of rice and about or more than 50% of the national production of soft wheat, rye, maize, sorghum, and other cereals Almost 30% of the agricultural added value Economically most developed areas of the country where about 20% of the country’s population lives
Po river basin land use WATER BODIES; 2,03% WETLAND; 0,16% URBAN AND INDUSTRIAL AREA; 6,69%
FOREST AND GRASSLAND; 45,14%
AGRICULTURE; 45,98%
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
DRINKING WATER SOURCES
The drinking water supply sources in the P-RDB is • groundwater 80% • springs 15% •surface water 5% Ground and surface waters are used especially in plains, while spring waters are more used in mountain regions.
The average water supply is 307 l vs 286 l per person per day of the national average supply.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6
3 2/5/2018
DRINKING WATER PROTECTION ZONES
A drinking water source such as a well or spring has to be protected by a three-level safeguard zone: •an Absolute Safety Zone close to the source •a Respect Zone depending on groundwater travel time •and a Protection Zone
WFD 2000/60/EC and D.Lgs. 152/2006
Natural vulnerability of aquifers suitable for drinking water
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7
FLOODING ISSUES
In P-RBD flood management is regulated by the Italian Laws D.lgs. 49/2010, according to the European Flood Directive 2007/60/EC and D.lgs 152/2006. National river basin districts, as P-RBD is, are in charge of establishing the “Food Risk Management Plan” and the “District Hydrogeological Regulation Plan (PAI)”. Main targets of these Plans are: •identifying flood areas, •arranging and managing activities in flood areas, •defining security targets and priorities actions in agree with Regional Administrations and with the participation of stakeholders, in order to: improve the effectiveness of existing hydrological and hydraulic protection system, reduce flood risk exposure, ensure more space for rivers flow, Flooding areas in P-RB defence of cities and metropolitan areas, improve the awareness of flood risk.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 8
4 2/5/2018
PILOT ACTION: PO RIVER BASIN
BP: Identifying and providing Minimum Flow
The Minimum Flow (MF) is a management tool designed to cope with critical situations due to large exploitation of natural discharges for civil, industrial or agricultural purposes, aimed to ensure a minimum hydrological component for the survival of local ecosystems downstream and along the river basin.
Regional Regulations define procedure to evaluate the MVF in each river and introducing procedures for issuing public water-supply concessions in according with the Po River Basin Management Plan.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 9
PILOT ACTION: PO RIVER BASIN
BP : IRRIFRAME and IRRINET projects
IRRIFRAME, at national scale, and IRRINET, for Emilia Romagna Region, are two web services able to support farmers in definition of optimum amount of water for irrigation according to the weather conditions, crops and soils in the area of interest.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 10
5 2/5/2018
PILOT ACTION: PO RIVER BASIN
BP: Salt intrusion management and monitoring
The Po river delta is composed of 5 reaches: Goro, Gnocca, Maistra, Tolle, and Pila. They are affected by salt intrusion from the Adriatic sea, moving upstream especially during low flows periods.
The salt intrusion is computed by two numerical suites respectively based on the Sobek hydraulic numerical model, with its quality module DELWAQ, and the simplified salinity distribution analytical model (Savenije et Al., 2006).
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 11
SALT INTRUSION
YEARSYEARS fromfromfrom mouth mouth mouth
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 12
6 2/5/2018
DEWS
BP: The Drought Steering Committee and DEWS (Drought Early Warning System)
Drought Steering Committee – now „Observatory“ is a Multisectoral partnership that consists in a forum of major water users in River Po basin, initiated and presided by the Po River Basin Authority.
Drought Steering Committee uses the outcomes of numeric model system to manage the water balance and evaluate alternative water resources allocation.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 13
FEWS
BP: The Flood Forecast Center for the Po River and FEWS Flood Early Warning System
Through FEWS PO it is possible to manage observed data (in situ and remote sensed), and forecasts obtained from meteorogical- hydrological- hydraulic simulation in order to early detect floods, their occurrence entity and characteristics, to support Civil Protection System
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 14
7 2/5/2018
1° NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
PARTICIPATION TO THE WORKSHOP (more than 40 people): •Po River District Autority •CMCC •Arpae •Arpa Veneto •Interregional Agency for the Po river (AIPO) •Emilia Romagna Region •Po Delta Land Reclamation Board •University of Bologna •University of Trento
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 15
OUTCOMES FROM THE 1° NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
•stakeholders involved should be not only technical experties but also communities directly and indirectly involeved to water shortage
•improve the amount of available and reliable data collection on water uses
•„Observatory“ is a valuable option to address activities and actions in attempting to mitigate the conflicts between upstream and downstream communities; but…. volountary actions hasn‘t enough power.
•NEED: Authority with decision-making power able to manage water crisis conditions to overcome institutional fragmentation and competence with unitary plans
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 16
8 2/5/2018
PLANNED ACTIVITIES
→ Hydrological/hydraulic modelling of climate change scenarios using daily precipitation and temperature (CMCC data – RCP 4.5 scenario).
→ Water balance model application (RIBASIM) to support the BP “Drought Steering Commettee” during extreme events; application of scenarios of withdrawals reduction and/or dam’s release.
Scenario simulation (+5% lake release, -5% in terms of agricultural withdrawals - forecast)
→ Mitigation of flood events using non structural actions
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 17
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Cinzia Alessandrini [email protected] www.arpae.it/sim TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 19
9
ANNEX 12 PA3.2 Along Danube Bend
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
2/13/2018
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Katowice, 16th–18th October 2017 PA3.2 Bank-filtered drinking water resources along Danube Bend
PROLINE-CE / General Directorate of Water ManagementTAKING COOPERATION / Magdolna Ambrus,FORWARD Robert Hegyi and1 Szilvia Dávid
One of the most important water resources in the country are the bank-filtered water abstractions along the Danube and on the Szentendrei and Csepel Islands.
These resources supply mainly Budapest and about 150 settlements in its agglomeration with drinking water. It is the nearly the quarter of Hungarians (about 2.5 million inhabitants).
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 2/13/2018
Bank-filtered drinking water resources
• Vulnerable water resources • >50% of extracted drinking water provide from surface water • The water quality and capacity depend on Danube’s hydraulic regime • There are total 121 drinking water resources on the pilot area: 59 groundwater, 9 shallow groundwater and 8 karst. • + 45 bank filtered resources: o 34 working 1.200.000 m3/day (6.000 – 130.000 m3/day) capacity + 4 reserve o 7 perspective (+146.000 m3/day planned capacity)
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
Geo- and hydrogeology
In the northern part of the PA volcanic hills (highest peaks around 900 m). Karstic areas are to be found in the western side of Budapest. Southern PA is covered with alluvial pleistocene and pannonian sediments which are coarse-grained fluvial deposits.
The water table is in 3-10 m depth. The Danubian alluvial sediments are highly productive gravel (sandy) aquifers. The capacity from the depth 20-80m is 500-800 l/min.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 2/13/2018
Flood issues
The bank filtered drinking water sources are situated along the Danube. Wells are protected from flooding with special technical solutions. Flood protection is important mostly in case of settlements.
The probability of flood hazard • on Szentendre Island is high, • in Budapest urban area is medium, • on the south plain part of the PA is low.
The most famous flood: • June 2013– the highest ever recorded flood level all along the Hungarian Danube section
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
Protected areas – EU WFD
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6
3 2/13/2018
Land use
Pilot Area 3.982 km2 Bank-filtered drinking water protective zones area on the Pilot Area: 389 km2.
Land use Area % on PA Area % on DWPZ
Non-irrigated arable land 35,42 38,5
Broad-leaved forest 17,36 11
Discontinuous urban fabric 14,06 11,4
Pastures 6,44 6,5
The land use of the pilot area is complex, Danube bend is mountainous and forested, the center of the PA is densely populated (Budapest and agglomeration), in the south and on the islands agriculture is typical. TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7
Drinking water protective zones
Protection involve multiple steps: determination, designation, establishment and maintenance of a protective block, area or zone.
Government Regulation defines the criteria of water protection zones:
• Inner protective block, zone (20 days): protection of the abstraction works and the water supplies from direct pollution and damage,
• Outer protective block, zone (180 days): protection against refractory, further bacterial and other decomposable pollutants,
• Hydrogeological block, zone (5 and 50 years): Protection against refractory pollutants by measures prescribed for the entire, or part of the catchment (recharge) area of the abstraction. The hydrogeological protective block or area is subdivided to "A" , "B" and "C" protective zones.
The delineation of protective zones is based on the estimation of travel time.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 8
4 2/13/2018
Drinking water protective zones on PA
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 9
Drinking water protective zones
Bank-filtered DW resources Working Perspective Reserve Total Legally protected with DWPZs 15 1 16 DWPZs are determinated, but isn't 17 6 23 water authority decision Pre-modelled DWPZs 2 4 6 Total 34 7 4 45
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 10
5 2/13/2018
Best Management Practices Forest Advantages • The northern and western part of the PA is coverd by forests. Some nice floodplain forest can still be find along the Danube, mainly outside of Budapest.(However owners are different : nature parks, private owners, forestry.) • Protective forest management and afforestation is present. • Forestry administration and control is present. • Agro-environmental payments under Rural Development Programme fosters afforestation along waters and arable land as protective forests, prevents leaching of agricultural pollution. • Soil and water protection functionality of forest ecosystems increasing water infiltration; reducing and slowing runoff and erosion.
Challanges • Ensure up-to-date knowledge transfer. • Control and clear legislative background to reach sustainable forest management. • Flood protection and forest on floodplain.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 11
Best Management Practices Grassland Advantages • Within the inner zone the field continuous grass cover is required. No fertilisers, manure and pesticides are utilisable. • Grassland may reduce quantitative and qualitative vulnerability of groundwater and surface water resources by retaining water, filtering and attenuating pollutants. • Appropriate grazing can efficiently contribute to weed control.
Challanges • information transfer towards farmers • increased awareness of farmers
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 12
6 2/13/2018
Best Management Practices Agriculture
Non-irrigated arable land covers 38% of the DWPAs, good agricultural practices are of high importance.
“Good Agricultural Practice” guidelines Budapest Waterworks Company created a good practice guideline regarding DWPZs for farmers to support the protection of drinking water recources in agricultural areas. In this clear explanation is given on the connection between land use and drinking water resources. Suggestions for appropriate and “water-friendly” soil management, usage of fertilizers and pesticides, sowing and planting, irrigation, husbandry and livestock breeding are given. Also adminsitrative obligations are incorporated. The guideline was especially designed for farmers working in water protection zones and considers all aspects of water protection needs, taking also into account the need of farmers. TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 13
Best Management Practices Agriculture
Advantages • “Good Agricultural Practice” can be applied also in other areas • Well formulated rules for DW protection zones, • Good practices regarding farming and production methods compatible with sustainable use of environment, and the application of manure, fertilisers and pesticides. • Agro-environmental payments encourage farmers to adopt these practices.
Challanges • The willingness of farmers to follow the guideline. • Effectiveness of measures is difficult to measure. • Need of professional knowledge.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 14
7 2/13/2018
Best Management Practices Urban areas (settlements)
The capital of Hungary (Budapest) is nearly on the centre of the PA, with agglomeration the urban area extent is significant (12%). Waste water treatment and rainwater management is of significant issue.
Advantages • Existing sewage systems and waste water treatment plants.
Challanges • Increase the connection to the sewage network. • Improve the waste water treatment technology. • Set up of individual waste water treatment plants for individual houses mainly in small settlements. • Prevent incoming rainwater to the sewage system – needs of separated systems.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 15
Best Management Practices Industrial areas
On the PA there are well-known industrial contaminated areas which also affect some drinking water resources. These contamination sites are abandoned industrial locations (Szentendre: Russian army fort; Budapest: Csepel-works- historical industrial area). Soil and groundwater pollution are typical: heavy metals, organic pollutants. Remediation work is continous since decades.
Advantages • The areas can be used newly for other activities. • Increase in the human health quality. • Increase in the value of real estate.
Challanges • Implementation of the remediation and recultivation. • Increase the level of controlling by authorities.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 16
8 2/13/2018
Best Management Practices Floodplain – river bed - forests From structural flood defense measures there are several ones which effect negatively the bank-filtered system. • Due to barrages built on upstream, the river bed is deepening. As a result, the natural filter surface decreases (gravel and film layer), which can endangers the quality and quantity of extracted water. • Dredging risks eliminating the natural filter (dredging is only permitted in exceptional cases).
Challenges Modelling of deepening’s effects on bank-filtered water abstraction is needed.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 17
CONCLUSIONS
1. Drinking water resources along the Danube depend mainly on good agricultural practices and the hydromorphological status of the Danube.
2. The main land use is agriculture, urban areas, and forests on hills and floodplains.
3. In case of bank-filtration the particular challenge is in the necessity of protection from both the river side and the background. In the same time the wells are shallow drilled, so the system is exceptionally vulnerable.
4. Due to the dual endangering there occur conflicts of interest amongst agriculture, nature protection, forestry, flood protection but also the goals of the WFD. Stakeholder consultations are of high importance.
5. Despite of the legislation the implementation and authority inspection is insufficient. Further problem is the low willingness to cooperation among farmers, other stakeholders and some water suppliers to ensure water protection. Despite of this national level insufficiency, there is a very good cooperation practice on this PA.
6. The DWPAs are situated on high-value real estates; this makes the procedure of designation more difficult for authorities. TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 18
9 2/13/2018
PLANNED ACTIVITIES
• Hydraulical/hydrological and hydrogeological modelling of climate change - time series analysis.
• Assesment of grazing effects in forests, and of plant regulation on floodplain. Direct cooperation with local stakeholders. Evaluation of good practices on pilot areas.
Proposal project activity:
• Assesment of floodplain forests, their role in water resource protection.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 19
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
General Directorate of Water Management Department of River Basin Management PROLINE-CE www.ovf.hu; www.vizugy.hu [email protected]; [email protected]
+00 06 1 225 4400 TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 20
10
ANNEX 13 WPT3 leader expectations of T2
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
6. 02. 2018
Goczałkowice, 17.10.2017
PILOT ACTIONS - FEEDBACK
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 1 PROLINE CE-110
GOWARE
• GOWARE will provide a concrete plan for implementation of sustainable land use and flood/drought management with the overall purpose of drinking water protection in the participating regions beyond project lifetime.
• All partners recognize solutions identified within their pilot actions and thus assume responsibility for the adaptability of the tool’s findings.
• The intensive stakeholder participation will also ensure the implementation and further usability of GOWARE in practice.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 6. 02. 2018
CATALOGUE OF MEASURESAND OF POSSIBILITIES FOR FUNDING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Development of measures and funding systems for supporting ecosystem services
Analytic report about potential public services of sustainable land use
Transnational analytic report about potential public services of sustainable and functional land use management regarding the pilot action clusters, which supports drinking water protection and flood/drought prevention.
Catalogue of measures and of possibilities for funding ecosystem services
Transnational documentation of potential measures and possibilities of funding ecosystem services which are compliant with a sustainable land use and flood/drought management model for protection of drinking water,
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSNATIONAL ADAPTATION PLAN FOR INTEGRATED LAND USE MANAGEMENT
Roadmap to transnational adaptation for integrated land use
Concept report, defining the necessary steps for reaching a transnational adaptation plan for integrated land use. Operational definition of essential management adaptation measures towards the protection of drinking water resources and from flood events.
Transnational adaptation plan for integrated land use management
Roll-out of a measure bundle, taking into account the results of the transnational pilot action clusters, in order to optimize water management in different landscape types.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 6. 02. 2018
PUBLIC SERVICES
Public services provided in the pilot actions areas,i.e. • flood prevention; drought prevention; • provision of drinking water; • recreation and tourism; • fishery; • minimum ecological flow; • instream flow, etc.
The key for accommodation and bringing together various and different functions.
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
EXPECTATIONS
• Good practices • Bad practices • Lessons learnt • What functions are present in pilot actions areas? • How various and different functions are brought together? • How reconciliation of potential conflicts is achieved?
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 6
3 6. 02. 2018
THANK YOU FOR YOURATTENTION!
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 7
4
ANNEX 14 WPT4 leader expectations of T2
Transnational Pilot Management Workshop Date: 17.10.2017 Location: Goczałkowice, Poland
D.T2.2.1 TRANSNATIONAL PILOT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
2/6/2018
Transnational Meeting 03 Katowice | 17th October 2017
First Transnational Pilot Management Workshop
1 PROLINE-CE| BFW | Elisabeth Gerhardt TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD
EXPECTATIONS OF T4 FOR T2 RESULTS D.T4.1.1 (Draft: 05/18, Final: 09/18): Coordination of a compilation of identified and committed targets towards effective and efficient function-oriented land use management practices Input for “Draft-version”: D.T2.3.1 Evaluation reports for each pilot action D.T2.3.3. PA Reports about cc issues in pilots D.T2.3.4 Strategic identification of need for action for clusters Input for “Final-version”: D.T2.3.5 Outcomes of practical testing D.T2.3.2 Transnational conclusive report containing recommendations Pilot action cluster reports (O.T2.1, O.T2.2., O.T.2.3) Action Plan (O.T2.4) TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2
1 2/6/2018
EXPECTATIONS OF T4 FOR T2 RESULTS
Output O.T4.1 (National) stakeholder operationalisation workshop series (12/18) Target: . Concretization of the transnational outputs (Action Plan, O.T2.4) and guidance (GOWARE-CE) to the operational level . Operationalisation/ application of best practice strategies for water protection . Discussion of pilot action cluster outcomes (O.T2.1, O.T2.2, O.T2.3) . Initiation of DriFlU formulation process
transnational transferability of results TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3
EXPECTATIONS OF T4 FOR T2 RESULTS
Output O.T4.2
DriFLU Charta (06/19) . Commitment towards an optimized and effective land use management with efficient organizational structures, regarding drinking water protection D.T2.3.2 Transnational conclusive report containing recommendations . Joint declaration act to bundle efforts towards an integrated land use and flood/drought management D.T2.3.5 Outcomes of practical testing , Action Plan (O.T2.4) . Identified, still existing shortcomings and challenges show potential for future cooperation efforts D.T2.3.4 Strategic identification of needs for action for clusters
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4
2 2/6/2018
EXPECTATIONS OF T4 FOR T2 RESULTS
General expectations
. Practical applicability . Delineation of a broad range of conflicts between land uses and water supply /water protection needs . Transferability of results in other areas . Involvement of manifold stakeholder groups (authorities from different levels, water suppliers, interest groups, research institutions, general public) to gather as much experiences as possible . Precise descriptions of recommendations built on PA experiences
TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 5
3