20 Years After Chornobyl Catastrophe FUTURE OUTLOOK National Report of Ukraine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

20 Years After Chornobyl Catastrophe FUTURE OUTLOOK National Report of Ukraine Ministry of Ukraine of Emergencies and Affairs of population protection from the consequences of Chornobyl Catastrophe AllUkrainian Research Institute of Population and Territories Civil Defense from Technogenic and Natural Emergencies 20 years after Chornobyl Catastrophe FUTURE OUTLOOK National Report of Ukraine Kyiv • Atika • 2006 ББК 31.47(4УКР) T36 To compile the National Report materials of the following organizations were used: The Ministry of Ukraine of Emergencies and Affairs of Population Protection from the consequences of Chornobyl catastrophe Ministry of Fuel and Energy of Ukraine Ministry of Health of Ukraine State Committee of Nuclear and Radiation Safety of Ukraine Committee of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on Environmental Policy, Nature Resources Management and Elimination of the Consequences of Chornobyl Catastrophe National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine National Commission of Radiation Protection of Population of Ukraine The materials included in the report were compiled by: Amdzhadin L. M. (4.1; 4.2); Arkhipov A. M. (8.1); Bazyka D. A. (5.1); Baryakhtar V. G. (1); Bebeshko V. G. (5, 15); Bily D. O. (5); Bobro D. G. (10); Bogdanov G. O. (6.2); Bondarenko O. O. (8.1); Borysyuk M. M. (12); Bruslova K. M. (5); Buzunov V. O. (5.1); Vozianov O. F. (5); Voytsekhovytch O. V. (2.2); Gaydar O. E. (2); Galkyna S. G. (5); Garnets O. N. (4.5); Gashchak S. P. (8.1); Glygalo V. M. (13); Goncharuk O. S. (4.6.3); Grodzinsky D. M. (6.1); Gudkov I. M. (6.1); Gunko N. V. (5); Davydchuk S. V. (2); Derevets V. V. (8.1); Dolin V. V. (8.1); Dubova N. F. (5); Dutov O. I. (6.2); Evdin O. M. (15); Zamostyan P. V. (4.5); Ivanov Yu. O. (8; 15); Ivanova T. M. (6.2); Izotenko A. I. (5.1); Ishchenko A. V. (4.4); Kalynenko L. V. (6.2; 15); Kashparov V. O. (6.2); Kireyev S. I. (8.1); Kluchnikov O. O. (9; 15); Kovalenko O. M. (5); Kovgan L. M. (3.3); Komarenko D. I. (5); Korol N. O. (5); Korzun V. N. (5.3); Korchagin P. O. (11); Kosovets O. O. (2); Krasnov V. A. (9); Krasnov V. P. (6.4); Kulchytska S. V. (14; 15); Kutova O. M. (2; 4.4); Kuchma M. D. (6.4; 8.1); Lazarev M. M. (6.1); Landin V. P. (6.4); Lev T. D. (6.2); Likhtaryov I. A. (3; 3.3); Lynchak O. V. (5); Lytvynenko O. E. (2); Loganovsky K. M. (5); Los I. P. (3.4; 5.3; 15); Lyashenko L. O. (5); Mozhar A. O. (6.2); Nasvit O. I. (12.2); Omeliya nets M. I. (5); Omeliyanets S. M. (5; 12); Omelyashko R. A. (4.3); Orlov O. O. (6.4); Parashyn S. K. (10); Perepelyatni kov G. P. (2.2; 6.3); Perepelyatnykova L. V. (6.2; 15); Piddubny V. A. (4.2); Pilinska M. A. (5); Pyrogova O. A. (5); Poyarkov V. O. (13); Prister B. S. (6: 6.1–6.4; 13; 15); Pryvalov Yu. O. (4.2); Prylipko V. A. (4.2); Prysyazhnyuk A. E. (5.1); Proskura M. I. (8; 11; 15); Rybakova E. O. (15); Rogozhyn O. G. (4.6.2); Romanenko A. M. (5); Romanenko A. Yu. (5); Rudenko G. B. (12; 15); Rudko V. M. (9); Saversky S. Yu. (2); Sayenko Yu. I. (4: 4.1–4.3; 4.6.5; 15); Sarkisova Ye. V. (5); Serduck A. M. (5; 15); Skaletsky Yu. M. (3.2); Skvortsov V. V. (11); Sobotovytch Ye. V. (11); Sotnykova G. E. (6.2); Stepanova E. I. (5); Sushko V. O. (5); Talko V. V. (5); Tabachny L. Ya. (2, 15); Tymchenko O. I. (5.3); Tkachenko N. V. (2; 15); Tokarevsky V. V. (11); Triskunova T. V. (5); Tronko M. D. (5); Trofymenko O. I. (4.2); Udovychenko V. P. (4.6.1); Fedirko P. A. (5); Khodorivska N. V. (4.6.4); Kholosha V. I. (7; 8; 15); Khomazyuk I. M. (5); Tsymbalyuk O. M. (5); Chepurko G. I. (4.2); Chumak A. A. (5; 15); Chumak V. V. (3.1, 3.2); Shestopalov V. M. (11; 15); Shybetsky Yu. O. (11); Shkrobov O. I. (2); Shteynberg M. O. (14; 15); Shcherbin V. M. (9); Zhebrovska K. I. (11); Yanina A. M. (5) Final version was made by the editorial board: Baloga V. I. (EditorinChief), Kholosha V. I. (assistant editorinchief), Evdin O. M. (assistant editorinchief), Perepelyatnykova L. V. (executive secretary), Baryakhtar V. G., Bebeshko V. G., Burlak G. F., Glygalo V. M., Grodzin sky D.M., Gudkov I. M., Ivanov Yu. O., Klyuchnikov O. O., Kutova O. M., Kuchma M. D., Los I. P., Prister B. S., Proskura M. I., Rudenko G. B., Sayenko Yu. I., Serdyuk A. M., Skakun V. O., Sobotovytch Ye. V., Tabachny L. Ya., Tkachenko N. V., Shestopalov V. M. Editorialtechnical group: Arkhipov A. M., Ivanova T. M., Perepelyatnykova L. V., Kalynenko L. V., Rybakova E. O., , Klimenko M. A., Matsko O. V. Coordinating organisation: AllUkrainian Research Institute of Population and Territories Civil Defense from Technogenic and Natural Emergencies (ME of Ukraine) The editorial board is grateful for comments to the English of some chapters received from Dr. Brenda Howard, Dr. Nicholas Beresford (CEH Lancaster), Dr. Jim Smith (CEH Dorset) and Dr. Martin Broadly (Nottingham University) T36 20 years after Chornobyl Catastrophe. Future outlook: National Report of Ukraine.– K.: Atika, 2006.– 216 p. [+ 8 pic.] ISBN 9663261722 The authors of chapters are responsible for presentation and reliability of materials ББК 31.47(4УКР) © Baloga V. I., Kholosha V. I., Evdin O. M., Perepelyatnykova L. V., etc., 2006 ISBN 9663261722 © «Аtika», 2006 LIST OF CONVENTIONAL SIGNS AND ABBREVIATIONS SSE «Technocentre» – State Specialized Enterprise «Technocentre» ALARA – As Low As Reasonably Achievable AMS – Academy of Medical Science ARS – Acute Radiation Syndrome ARDIET– Allunion Research and Design Institute of Energetic Technology of Minseredmash of USSR AZF – Active Zone Fragments (Core Fragment) AC605 – Administration of Construction № 605 MCM of USSR – specialized building organi zation set up to make sarcophagus Bq (kBq, MBq, GBq, TBq, PBq) – Becquerel (Bq⋅103, Bq⋅106, Bq⋅109, Bq⋅1012, Bq⋅1015), radioactivity unit BSRRSU 2005 – Basic Sanitary Regulations of Radiation Safety of Ukraine CDC IA «Combinat» – Council of Dosimetric control of Industrial Association «Combinat» CEC – Commission of European Communities ChNPP – Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant CPRD – Chornobyl Program of Remediation and Developing CL – Control Level CMZ – Critical mass zone CRMEZ – Centre of Radiological Monitoring of Exclusion Zone CSNFSF – Centralized SNF Storage Facility ASRCC – Automatic System of Radiation Condition Control DSS – Dust Suppression System EBRD – European Bank of Reconstruction and Development EDC – Exposure Dose Capacity EPR – Electron paramagnetic resonance ESCUN – Economical and Social Council of UN EZ – Exclusion Zone EZ and ZAR – Exclusion Zone and Zone of Absolute resettlement FCE – Fuel Containing Elements FCM – Fuel Containing Materials FPC – Fuel and Power Complex FGI – FrenchGerman Initiative for Chornobyl Grey (Gy) – Grey, unit of absorbed dose HLRW – High level radioactive waste ІАЕ – I. V. Kurchatov Institute for Atomic Energy IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency ICGNS – International Consultative Group on Nuclear Safety ICSRWM – Industrial Complex for Solid RW Management IDD – Iodine Deficiency Diseases IPHECA – International Program on Health Effects of the Chernobyl Accident TPL91 – Temporal Permissible Levels, acted up to 1997. IRWSU – Interim Radioactive Waste Storage Unit KIEP – Kyiv Institute «Energy project» LFCM – Lavalike fuel containing materials LRWTP – Liquid radioactive wastes treatment plant LRW – Liquid radioactive wastes LRW SO – Liquid radioactive wastes SO LRWSF – Liquid radioactive waste storage facility ME of Ukraine – Ministry of Ukraine of Emergencies and Affairs of Population Protection from the Consequences of Chornobyl catastrophe MHU – Ministry for Health of Ukraine Minseredmash (MPEI) – Ministry of Power Engineering Industry of USSR mR, (R)/hour – Milliroentgen (Roentgen) per hour, exposure radiation dose capacity NASU – National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine NCRPU – National Commission on Radiation Protection of population of Ukraine 3 NNEC «Energoatom» – National nuclearenergetic company «Energoatom» NPC – Nuclear power complex NSC – New Safe Confinement ODRSR – Official Dose Records in State Register of Ukraine OG – Operations Group ROW – Recovery operation workers PCa – Permissible concentration of substance in air PL97 – Permissible Levels of 137Cs and 90Sr radionuclides concentration in food and drinking water, valid at the moment RADRUE – Realistic Analytical Dose Reconstruction and Uncertainty Analysis RBMK – Model of Reactor (high power capacity, channel) RCM – Radiocontaminated materials RODOS – System of collection and information processing on accident and development of rec ommendations on decisions making RIA «Prypiat» – ResearchIndustrial Association «Prypiat» RSSU97 – Radiation Safety Standard of Ukraine97 RW – Radioactive wastes RWBU – Radioactive Waste Burial Units SCRM AMS – Scientific Centre of Radiation Medicine of Academy of medical sciences of Ukraine SCNR – State committee of nuclear regulation SCR – Selfsustained Chain Reaction SCS – State committee of statistics SFA – Spent fuel assembly SIP – Shelter Implementation Plan SNF – Spent Nuclear Fuel SNF DSF – SNF Dry Storage Facility SNFSF – Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility SO – Shelter Object SR – Safety rods (System of control and safety of reactor) SRU – State Registry of Ukraine SRW – Solid radioactive waste SRWSF – Solid radioactive waste storage facility SRWTC – Solid Radioactive Waste Treatment Complex SSE ChNPP – State specialized enterprise «Chornobyl nuclear power plant» SSSIE «Ecocentre» – State Specialized Scientific – Industrial enterprise «Ecocentre» Sv (mSv) – Sivert (milisivert), effective dose unit TC – Thyroid Cancer TD – Thermoluminescent dosimeter TF – Transfer factor of radionuclides in natural chains The USSR – The Union of Soviet Social Republics TISNO – Technogenic intensified sources of natural origin TUE – Transuranium elements Ukr SA «Radon» – Ukrainian state association «Radon» UN SCNRA – UN Scientific Committee on Nuclear Radiation Activities UNDP – United Nation Development Program UIAR – Ukrainian Institute for Agricultural Radiology URTC – Ukrainian Radiological Training Centre WHO – World Health Organization WMR – Watermoderated reactor WBC – Whole body counter HISTORIOGRAPHY OF EVENTS 1.
Recommended publications
  • Environment International 146 (2021) 106282
    Environment International 146 (2021) 106282 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environment International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envint Current radiological situation in areas of Ukraine contaminated by the Chornobyl accident: Part 2. Strontium-90 transfer to culinary grains and forest woods from soils of Ivankiv district I. Labunskaa’*, S. Levchukb, V. Kashparov b,c, D. Holiakab, L. Yoschenkob, D. Santilloa, P. Johnston a a Greenpeace Research Laboratories, Innovation Centre Phase 2, Rennes Drive, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK b Ukrainian Institute of Agricultural Radiology (UIAR) of National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Mashinobudivnykiv str.7, Chabany, Kyiv Region 08162, Ukraine c CERAD CoE Environmental Radioactivity/Department of Environmental Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Aas, Norway ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handling Editor: Olga Kalantzi Some of the highest 90Sr activity concentrations recorded beyond the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone occur in the Ivankiv district of Ukraine, located approximately 50 km south of the power plant, an area which nonetheless Keywords: remains important for agricultural production. Although characterized by soils with low exchangeable calcium 90Sr values, which can enhance the bioavailability of certain radionuclides, information on the transfer of 90Sr to food Grain contamination crops and trees in the region has remained limited to date. Analysis of 116 grain samples (wheat, rye, oat, barley Wood contamination or Triticale) collected from fields in 13 settlements in the region between 2011 and 2019 revealed 90Sr and 137Cs The Chernobyl accident Effective dose activity concentrations above Ukrainian limits in almost half of those samples, with annual averages exceeding Transfer factor this limit in four of those nine years (most recently in 2018) and with no clear evidence for a declining trend over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone Against Illegal Movement of Radioactive Materials
    Securing the Chornobyl exclusion zone against illegal movement of radioactive materials Oleg O. Bondarenko1, Mykola I. Proskura2, Klaus E. Duftschmid3, Nikolay E. Kravchenko4, 1 SSSIE Ecocentre, 6 Shkilna Street, Chornobyl 07270, Kyiv region, Ukraine, E-mail [email protected] 2 State dept. – Administration of the Chornobyl Exclusion zone, 14 Radyanska Street, Chornobyl 07270, Kyiv region, Ukraine 3 Technical University Graz, Institute for Techn. Physics, 15 Petersgasse, A-8010 Graz, Austria, Consultant to IAEA 4 State Customs Committee of Russian Federation, 11/5 Novozavodskaya, 121087 Moscow, Russia Abstracts. Within the framework of the IAEA Nuclear Security Program the technical cooperation project “Strengthening Security of Nuclear Materials in Ukraine” (UKR/0/008) is aimed primarily to strengthen protection the entrance/exit checkpoints of the Chornobyl exclusion zone and adjacent State borders of Ukraine against illicit movement of radioactive materials (including nuclear materials). The particular situation of the exclusion zone presents a high risk of uncontrolled movement of radioactive materials from and into the exclusion zone. In view of the future construction of the “Shelter-2” and decommissioning of the three closed reactor blocks it is expected that the traffic through the exclusion zone will considerably increase in the next years and those large amounts of possibly contaminated metal scrap, construction material and equipment will leave the zone. There is also a risk of illegal movement of radioactive waste into the zone, possibly also through the international border, which could make the zone to an illegal dumping ground for radioactive waste. As practice shows theft of nuclear materials cannot be excluded.
    [Show full text]
  • Viva Xpress Logistics (Uk)
    VIVA XPRESS LOGISTICS (UK) Tel : +44 1753 210 700 World Xpress Centre, Galleymead Road Fax : +44 1753 210 709 SL3 0EN Colnbrook, Berkshire E-mail : [email protected] UNITED KINGDOM Web : www.vxlnet.co.uk Selection ZONE FULL REPORT Filter : Sort : Group : Code Zone Description ZIP CODES From To Agent UA UAAOD00 UA-Ukraine AOD - 4 days POLISKE 07000 - 07004 VILCHA 07011 - 07012 RADYNKA 07024 - 07024 RAHIVKA 07033 - 07033 ZELENA POLIANA 07035 - 07035 MAKSYMOVYCHI 07040 - 07040 MLACHIVKA 07041 - 07041 HORODESCHYNA 07053 - 07053 KRASIATYCHI 07053 - 07053 SLAVUTYCH 07100 - 07199 IVANKIV 07200 - 07204 MUSIIKY 07211 - 07211 DYTIATKY 07220 - 07220 STRAKHOLISSIA 07225 - 07225 OLYZARIVKA 07231 - 07231 KROPYVNIA 07234 - 07234 ORANE 07250 - 07250 VYSHGOROD 07300 - 07304 VYSHHOROD 07300 - 07304 RUDNIA DYMERSKA 07312 - 07312 KATIUZHANKA 07313 - 07313 TOLOKUN 07323 - 07323 DYMER 07330 - 07331 KOZAROVYCHI 07332 - 07332 HLIBOVKA 07333 - 07333 LYTVYNIVKA 07334 - 07334 ZHUKYN 07341 - 07341 PIRNOVE 07342 - 07342 TARASIVSCHYNA 07350 - 07350 HAVRYLIVKA 07350 - 07350 RAKIVKA 07351 - 07351 SYNIAK 07351 - 07351 LIUTIZH 07352 - 07352 NYZHCHA DUBECHNIA 07361 - 07361 OSESCHYNA 07363 - 07363 KHOTIANIVKA 07363 - 07363 PEREMOGA 07402 - 07402 SKYBYN 07407 - 07407 DIMYTROVE 07408 - 07408 LITKY 07411 - 07411 ROZHNY 07412 - 07412 PUKHIVKA 07413 - 07413 ZAZYMIA 07415 - 07415 POHREBY 07416 - 07416 KALYTA 07420 - 07422 MOKRETS 07425 - 07425 RUDNIA 07430 - 07430 BOBRYK 07431 - 07431 SHEVCHENKOVE 07434 - 07434 TARASIVKA 07441 - 07441 VELIKAYA DYMERKA 07442 - 07442 VELYKA
    [Show full text]
  • Monday 4Th December 2017 Welcome and Opening
    TIEMS 2017 Annual Conference Preliminary Program Monday 4th December 2017 Chair: Andre Samberg 0900 - 1000 Welcome and Opening Ceremony Award Ceremony TIEMS Ukraine and Rotary Club of Eastern Helsinki will deliver award prizes to 2 reps from Lviv State University of Life Safety (Outstanding Young Researcher 2017 and Outstanding Instructor 2017) Signing Ceremony TIEMS and Ukrainian Academy of Cyber Security will sign a Memorandum of Understanding 1000 - 1030 Coffee & Tea 1030 – 1230 WORKSHOP1 Workshop 1 Leveraging TIEMS Disaster Management Expertise to Strengthen Local Community Resilience through Global DRR Platform, Web-based Technologies for Disaster Risk Reduction TIEMS Korea Chapter http://www.pr4gdm Overview of Global DRR Technology Platform . Welcome Remarks (K. Harald Drager, TIEMS President) . Introduction (Prof. Young Jai Lee, Donnguk University) . Website Demonstration (Dongguk University Research Team) Case Studies (Facilitator-K. H. Drager) Presentation 1: Disaster Risk Reduction in the City of San Diego Presenter: Dr. Thomas Robertson, USA Q&A (Presenter asks prepared questions to the audience) Presentation 2: CERT and Local Community Resilience in China Present and Future Presenter: 2. Dr. Qu Guosheng (China) Q&A (Presenter asks prepared questions to the audience) Presentation 3: International cooperation in education in civil protection in Ukraine Presenter: Prof. Andre Samberg, TIEMS Ukraine President Q&A (Presenter asks prepared questions to the audience) Presenter 4: The weakness of strong early warning systems. The
    [Show full text]
  • Chernobyl and Nuclear Power in the Ussr
    CHERNOBYL 7i 4 "M w* n !r ? y V. 'W/m /. & NUCLEAR POWER IN THE USSR DAVID R. MARPLES CHERNOBYL AND NUCLEAR POWER IN THE USSR CHERNOBYL AND NUCLEAR POWER IN THE USSR David R. Marpies Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies University of Alberta Edmonton 1986 Published in association with the Macmillan Press, London THE CANADIAN LIBRARY IN UKRAINIAN STUDIES A series of original works and reprints relating to Ukraine, issued under the editorial supervision of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta. Edmonton. Copyright © 1986 David R. Marples Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Marples, David Roger, 1952— Chernobyl and nuclear power in the USSR Bibliography: p. Includes index. ISBN 0-920862-48-9 (bound). - ISBN 0-920862-50-0 (pbk.) 1. Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station (Ukraine). 2. Nuclear power plants - Ukraine - Chernobyl - Accidents. 3. Nuclear industry - Soviet Union. 4. Nuclear energy - Government policy - Soviet Union. I. Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies. II. Title. TK1362.S65M37 1986 363.T79 C86-091498-4 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or other- wise without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Typesetting: The Typeworks, Vancouver Distributed by the University of Toronto Press 5201 Dufferin Street Downsview, Ontario Canada M3H 5T8 Contents Acknowledgements vii Introduction ix Chapter One: A Chernobyl Diary, 28 April- 14 May 1986 1 Chapter Two: Soviet Energy in the 1980s 37 Chapter Three: Nuclear Energy Development in Eastern Europe 51 Chapter Four: Ukraine in the Soviet Nuclear Energy Programme 71 Chapter Five: Safety in the Soviet Nuclear Power Industry 95 Chapter Six: The Chernobyl Disaster 115 Chapter Seven: After Chernobyl 153 Epilogue 181 Notes 185 Selected References 197 Appendices 203 Index of Personnel 209 Acknowledgements I am indebted to a number of individuals and institutions who have as- sisted me over the past few months.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT of Chornobyl Center for Nuclear Safety, Radioactive Waste and Radioecology
    REPORT of Chornobyl Center for Nuclear Safety, Radioactive Waste and Radioecology On results of studies in 2017 on theme: Assessment of state and development tendencies of natural landscapes and biodiversity on the territoru of Chernobyl exclusion zone In framework of the UNEP-GEF project “Conserving, Enhancing and Managing Carbon Stocks and Biodiversity in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone” Reporting period 08.08.2017 – 31.12.2017 Agreement No. SSFA/2017/14 S1-32GFL-000370/11232/SB-000687.37/14AC0003 Signed: General Director of CC Bondarkov Mikhail D. 2017 Report of Chornobyl Center on UNEP-GEF project in 2017 2 CONTENT INTORDUCTION. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT .............................................................................. 4 MAIN DATA OF THE PROJECT .......................................................................................................................................... 4 MAIN GOAL..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 EXPECTED RESULTS OF THE PROJECT .............................................................................................................................. 4 DELIVERABLES. GENERAL GEOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CHEZ ................................................ 5 DIVERSITY OF ECOSYSTEMS AND LANDSCAPES ............................................................................................................... 5 WEATHER AND CLIMATE CONDITIONS IN CHEZ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Instructions for the Norwegian Goverment's Standard Terms and Conditions for IT Procurement - SSA-K 2018
    Appendix Instructions for the Norwegian Goverment's Standard Terms and Conditions for IT Procurement - SSA-K 2018 Appendix Instructions for the Norwegian Goverment's Standard Terms and Conditions for IT Procurement - SSA-K 2018 Revised 12/19/2019 8:29:23 AM Appendix Instructions for the Norwegian Goverment's Standard Terms and Conditions for IT Procurement - SSA-K 2018 Table of contents Appendix 1: Customer requirements spesification The Agreement, clause 1.1 Scope of the Agreement The Agreement, clause 2.1.2 Customisations and installation, etc. The Agreement, clause 2.1.4 Documentation and training The Agreement, clause 2.2.2 Duty to examine The Agreement, clause 2.7 External legal requirements The Agreement, clause 4.3 Free software Appendix 2: Contractor description of the deliverables The Agreement, clause 1.1 Scope of the Agreement The Agreement, clause 2.1.1 Software and equipment The Agreement, clause 2.1.3 Applicability of standard licence and agreement terms and conditions The Agreement, clause 2.1.6 Warranty period and guaranteed performance The Agreement, clause 2.7 External legal requirements The Agreement, clause 4.3 Free software Appendix 3: Customer technical platform The Agreement, clause 1.1 Scope of the Agreement Appendix 4: Delivery date and other deadlines The Agreement, clause 2.1.5 Time and place for the Contractor's performance The Agreement, clause 6.2 Liquidated damages in the case of delay Appendix 5: Approval test The Agreement, clause 2.2.2 Duty to examine Appendix 6: Administrative provisions The Agreement,
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program
    TIEMS 2017 Annual Conference Final Program Sunday 3rd December 2017 Registration will be possible 2000 - 2200 Monday 4th December 2017 Chair: Andre Samberg 0800 – 0900 Registration 0900 - 1000 Welcome and Opening Ceremony Oleksandra CHURKINA Deputy Minister of Social Policy of Ukraine on European integration of Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine will deliver the welcome word on behalf of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Artur AYVAZOV UNICEF's Director for Social and Children Policy in Ukraine will welcome TIEMS and the participants of the TIEMS Annual Conference 2017 in Kyiv. Award Ceremony TIEMS Ukraine and Rotary Club of Eastern Helsinki will deliver award prizes to 2 reps from Lviv State University of Life Safety (Outstanding Young Researcher 2017 and Outstanding Instructor 2017) Signing Ceremony TIEMS and Ukrainian Academy of Cyber Security will sign a Memorandum of Understanding 1000 - 1030 Coffee & Tea 1030 – 1250 WORKSHOP1 Workshop 1 Leveraging TIEMS Disaster Management Expertise to Strengthen Local Community Resilience through Global DRR Platform, Web-based Technologies for Disaster Risk Reduction TIEMS Korea Chapter http://www.pr4gdm 1 1250 - 1350 Lunch 1350 – 1520 WORKSHOP 2 Workshop 2 Assessments of Vulnerabilities of Cyber in Power Grids and Critical Infrastructure: Case Ukraine 2015 – 2017 Chaired by: Oleksand Sukhodolia and Oleksandr Korneiko National Institute for Strategic Studies of Ukraine, Department of Cyber Security of National Academy of Internal Affairs in Kyiv and Ukrainian Academy of Cyber Security PRESENTATION FOLLOWED BY DISCUSSION IMPLEMENTATION OF CIP CONCEPT IN UKRAINE: ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES Oleksandr Sukhodolia, Ukraine 1520 - 1530 Coffee & Tea 2 1530 – 1700 WORKSHOP 3 Workshop 3 Presentation and Discussion of the TARGET EU Project Rod McCall, Luxembourg, The TARGET Project Team http://www.target-h2020.eu/ 1700 - 1800 Poster Session Viewing Posters (List of Posters at the end of the Program) 1800 - 2000 TIEMS Reception Networking Tuesday 5th December 2017 Chairs: K.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Fires, Smoke Emissions, and Dispersion of Radionuclides in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone Wei Min Haoã, Oleg O
    Developments in Environmental Science, Volume 8 265 A. Bytnerowicz, M. Arbaugh, A. Riebau and C. Andersen (Editors) Copyright r 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ISSN: 1474-8177/DOI:10.1016/S1474-8177(08)00012-0 Chapter 12 Vegetation Fires, Smoke Emissions, and Dispersion of Radionuclides in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone Wei Min HaoÃ, Oleg O. Bondarenko, Sergiy Zibtsev and Diane Hutton Abstract The accident of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant (ChNPP) in 1986 was probably the worst environmental disaster in the past 30 years. The fallout and accumulation of radionuclides in the soil and vegetation could have long-term impacts on the environment. Radionuclides released during large, catastrophic vegetation fires could spread to continental Europe, Scandinavia, and Russia. The potential for large fires occurring in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (EZ) was assessed based on vegetation conditions. We reviewed the composition of radionuclides in the soil and vegetation and in the particulate matter emitted by fires. The highest atmospheric radionuclide 137Cs levels occurred in early spring and late fall, corresponding to the most intense periods of burning in the EZ. It is evident from satellite images that smoke plumes from the EZ and southern Ukraine dispersed several hundred kilometers from the active fires and reached a major metropolitan area. We propose to install a satellite receiving station to detect fires in real time. It is also essential to develop a smoke dispersion and air quality forecasting model to predict the radioactivity levels downwind from catastrophic fires in order to protect public health. 12.1. Introduction The explosion of the No.
    [Show full text]
  • Consuming Dystopic Places: What Answers Are We Looking For?
    Consuming dystopic places: What answers are we looking for? Introduction The Chernobyl Exclusion Zone is usually described as an abandoned, ghostly area, where silence has much to say. It tells a story of the night when hydrogen and graphite explosions scattered nuclear fuel and radioactive debris across a large part of Europe, affecting not only humans but also plants, animals, air, soil, roads, houses. The people inhabiting the wider Chernobyl region were forced to fight against the invisible enemy for many months, and years, to come. The event changed their everyday lives, their identities, their presents and futures. Several decades after the disaster, however, the situation in the Zone has in many ways changed – it has been reclaimed by nature, repopulated by people and increasingly visited by tourists. The Ukrainian government proclaimed the Zone safe for visitors and officially opened it for tourism in 2011 (Yankovska & Hannam, 2014). Established guided one-day or multi-day tours offer small tourist groups a safe passage through the area. People visit for various reasons – journalism, research, photography, adventure, urban exploration, inspiration, or finding meanings of the place. Most visitors to the Exclusion Zone are driven by educational reasons, to learn more about the catastrophe and its aftermath. Urbexers and photographers are drawn to it by a desire to explore and document the abandoned, ruined places (Yankovska & Hannam, 2014), while others want to visit the locations which are featured in movies or video games. There are also unofficial visits, paid by so-called ‘stalkers’ who cross ‘the borders’ and explore the place on their own.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Years After Chornobyl Catastrophe. Future Outlook: National Report of Ukraine.- K.: Atika, 2006.-216 P
    I M I 4 - v. n~uX UA0600901 • t 20 years AFTER CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT FUTURE OUTLOOK Ministry of Ukraine of Emergencies and Affairs of population protection from the consequences of Chornobyl Catastrophe All-Ukrainian Research Institute of Population and Territories Civil Defense from Technogenic and Natural Emergencies 20 years after Chornobyl Catastrophe FUTURE OUTLOOK National Report of Ukraine Kyiv • Atika • 2006 BBK31.47(4YKP) T36 To compile the National Report materials of the following organizations were used: The Ministry of Ukraine of Emergencies and Affairs of Population Protection from the consequences of Chornobyl catastrophe Ministry of Fuel and Energy of Ukraine Ministry of Health of Ukraine State Committee of Nuclear and Radiation Safety of Ukraine Committee of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on Environmental Policy, Nature Resources Management and Elimination of the Consequences of Chornobyl Catastrophe National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine National Commission of Radiation Protection of Population of Ukraine The materials included in the report were compiled by: Amdzhadin L. M. (4.1; 4.2); Arkhipov A. M. (8.1); Bazyka D. A. (5.1); Baryakhtar V. G. (1); Bebcshko V. G. (5, 15); Bily D. 0. (5); Bobro D. G. (10); Bogdanov G. O. (6.2); Bondarenko O. O. (8.1); Borysyuk M. M. (12); Bruslova K. M. (5); Buzunov V. 0. (5.1); Vozianov O. F. (5); Voytsckhovytch O. V. (2.2); Gaydar O. E. (2); Galkyna S. G. (5); Garnets O. N. (4.5); Gashchak S. P. (8.1); Glygalo V. M.(13); Goncharuk O. S. (4.6.3); Grodzinsky D.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Power Plant Tour and Pripyat
    Individual Power Plant Tour And Pripyat Uncover the fascinating secrets and facts about history’s most dreadful ecological disaster. Visit the epicenter of 1986’s infamous events – - Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. You will also witness the frightening results of the disaster on the streets of Chernobyl and Pripyat. The schedule and the itinerary of a private tour is can be flexible. - 100% safe and legal - Lunch included - Protective suits included -Transfer from and to your hotel in Kyiv 1 Approximate Itinerary (may be changed up to the CEZ administration request) 07:30-08:00 a.m. • Pick up from your hotel in Kyiv • Depart to Chernobyl 08:15-10:00 a.m. • Road to the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone 10:00-10:20 a.m. • "Dytyatky" checkpoint. Pass through Dytiatky police and dosimetry control checkpoint on the border of the 30-km Exclusion Zone (exclusion zone and the zone of absolute (mandatory resettlement), passport check, instruction of radiation safety rules. 10:30 a.m. • Cherevach village. Behold hundreds of deserted houses on the way to Chernobyl town. • Zalissya village. A place that was once home for more than 3500 people. • Discover the town of Chernobyl. The town with more than 4000 residents, most of whom are the personal of the Exclusion Zone and Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. – Chernobyl Downtown, main square – Wormwood Star monument – The memorial complex to all towns and villages that got under the law of mandatory resettlement – Statue of Lenin. A rare chance to see a statue of an infamous communist leader Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
    [Show full text]