Olfactory Cortex Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

This Accepted Manuscript has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. Review | Development Development and organization of the evolutionary conserved three-layered olfactory cortex Olfactory cortex development Esther Klingler Department of Basic Neuroscience, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0193-16.2016 Received: 6 July 2016 Revised: 11 November 2016 Accepted: 8 December 2016 Published: 20 January 2017 Author Contributions: EK designed and wrote the paper. Conflict of Interest: Authors report no conflict of interest. Correspondence should be addressed to Esther Klingler, Jabaudon Lab, Department of Basic Neuroscience, University of Geneva, CMU, 1, rue Michel Servet, 1206 Geneva – Switzerland, E-mail: [email protected] Cite as: eNeuro 2017; 10.1523/ENEURO.0193-16.2016 Alerts: Sign up at eneuro.org/alerts to receive customized email alerts when the fully formatted version of this article is published. Accepted manuscripts are peer-reviewed but have not been through the copyediting, formatting, or proofreading process. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. Copyright © 2017 the authors ϭ Manuscript Title Page Ϯ ϯ ϰ 1. Manuscript Title ϱ Ǧ Ǥ ϲ ϳ 2. Abbreviated Title ϴ ϵ ϭϬ 3. List of all Author Names and Affiliations ϭϭ ǣ ǡ ǡ ǡǤ ϭϮ ϭϯ 4. Author Contributions ϭϰ Ǥ ϭϱ ϭϲ 5. Correspondence should be addressed to ϭϳ ǡǤ̷Ǥ ϭϴ ΪͶͳʹʹ͵͹ͻͶͳ͸͹ ϭϵ ϮϬ ǡ ǡ Ϯϭ ͳǡ ϮϮ ͳʹͲ͸ Ǧ Ϯϯ Ϯϰ 6. Number of Figures:͵ Ϯϱ 7. Number of Tables: Ͳ Ϯϲ 8. Number of Multimedia:Ͳ Ϯϳ Ϯϴ 9. Number of words for Abstract: ͳͷͲ Ϯϵ 10. Number of words for Significance Statement: ͳͲͷ ϯϬ 11. Number of words for Introduction: ͷͲͷ ϯϭ 12. Number of words for Discussion: ͶͺͲ ϯϮ ϯϯ 13. Acknowledgments ϯϰ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤ ϯϱ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ϯϲ ϯϳ 14. Conflict of Interest ϯϴ ǣ ϯϵ ϰϬ 15. Funding sources ϰϭ ǡ ȋǡ Ȍǡ ϰϮ ȋ ǡȌǤ ϰϯ ϰϰ ϭ ϰϱ Title: Development and organization of the evolutionary conserved three-layered ϰϲ olfactory cortex.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Early Aging Effect on the Function of the Human Central Olfactory System
Journals of Gerontology: Biological Sciences cite as: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2017, Vol. 72, No. 8, 1007–1014 doi:10.1093/gerona/glw104 Advance Access publication June 11, 2016 Original Article Early Aging Effect on the Function of the Human Central Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/article/72/8/1007/2629931 by guest on 27 September 2021 Olfactory System Choice Editor’s Jianli Wang,1 Xiaoyu Sun,1 and Qing X. Yang2 1Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey. 2Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey. Address correspondence to Jianli Wang, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033. E-mail: [email protected] Received November 23, 2015; Accepted April 27, 2016 Decision Editor: Rafael de Cabo, PhD Abstract During normal aging process, the smell function declines significantly, starting from the sixth decade of age. While it has been shown that activity in the central olfactory system of seniors responding to odor stimulation is significantly less than that of young people, no information of the aging effect on the functions of this system during normal adulthood and early aging has been gathered. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the olfaction-related brain activity in the central olfactory structures of 43 healthy adult volunteers aged from 22 to 64 years. The participants’ smell identification function was negatively correlated with age (r = −.32, p = .037). Significant negative correlation was observed between age and the olfaction-related activities in the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, left insular cortex, and left orbitofrontal cortex (p < .001, corrected with cluster size ≥28 voxels).
[Show full text]
Quantitative Analysis of Axon Collaterals of Single Pyramidal Cells
Yang et al. BMC Neurosci (2017) 18:25 DOI 10.1186/s12868-017-0342-7 BMC Neuroscience RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Quantitative analysis of axon collaterals of single pyramidal cells of the anterior piriform cortex of the guinea pig Junli Yang1,2*, Gerhard Litscher1,3* , Zhongren Sun1*, Qiang Tang1, Kiyoshi Kishi2, Satoko Oda2, Masaaki Takayanagi2, Zemin Sheng1,4, Yang Liu1, Wenhai Guo1, Ting Zhang1, Lu Wang1,3, Ingrid Gaischek3, Daniela Litscher3, Irmgard Th. Lippe5 and Masaru Kuroda2 Abstract Background: The role of the piriform cortex (PC) in olfactory information processing remains largely unknown. The anterior part of the piriform cortex (APC) has been the focus of cortical-level studies of olfactory coding, and asso- ciative processes have attracted considerable attention as an important part in odor discrimination and olfactory information processing. Associational connections of pyramidal cells in the guinea pig APC were studied by direct visualization of axons stained and quantitatively analyzed by intracellular biocytin injection in vivo. Results: The observations illustrated that axon collaterals of the individual cells were widely and spatially distrib- uted within the PC, and sometimes also showed a long associational projection to the olfactory bulb (OB). The data showed that long associational axons were both rostrally and caudally directed throughout the PC, and the intrinsic associational fibers of pyramidal cells in the APC are omnidirectional connections in the PC. Within the PC, associa- tional axons typically followed rather linear trajectories and irregular bouton distributions. Quantitative data of the axon collaterals of two pyramidal cells in the APC showed that the average length of axonal collaterals was 101 mm, out of which 79 mm (78% of total length) were distributed in the PC.
[Show full text]
Abnormalities of Grey and White Matter [11C]Flumazenil Binding In
Brain (2002), 125, 2257±2271 Abnormalities of grey and white matter [11C]¯umazenil binding in temporal lobe epilepsy with normal MRI A. Hammers,1,2,3 M. J. Koepp,1,2,3 R. Hurlemann,2 M. Thom,2 M. P. Richardson,1,2,3 D. J. Brooks1 and J. S. Duncan1,2,3 1MRC Clinical Sciences Centre and Division of Correspondence to: Professor John S. Duncan, MA, DM, Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, FRCP, National Society for Epilepsy and Institute of 2Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Neurology, 33 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK Institute of Neurology, University College London, London E-mail: [email protected] and 3National Society for Epilepsy MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, UK Summary In 20% of potential surgical candidates with refrac- the 16 patients with abnormalities, ®ndings were con- tory epilepsy, current optimal MRI does not identify cordant with EEG and clinical data, enabling further the cause. GABA is the principal inhibitory neuro- presurgical evaluation. Group ®ndings were: (i) transmitter in the brain, and GABAA receptors are decreased FMZ-Vd in the ipsilateral (Z = 3.01) and expressed by most neurones. [11C]Flumazenil (FMZ) contralateral (Z = 2.56) hippocampus; (ii) increased PET images the majority of GABAA receptor sub- FMZ-Vd in the ipsilateral (Z = 3.71) and contralat- types. We investigated abnormalities of FMZ binding eral TLWM (two clusters, Z = 3.11 and 2.79); and in grey and white matter in 18 patients with refrac- (iii) increased FMZ-Vd in the ipsilateral frontal lobe tory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and normal quan- white matter between the superior and medial frontal titative MRI.
[Show full text]
Corticostriatal Interactions During Learning, Memory Processing, and Decision Making
The Journal of Neuroscience, October 14, 2009 • 29(41):12831–12838 • 12831 Mini-Symposium Corticostriatal Interactions during Learning, Memory Processing, and Decision Making Cyriel M. A. Pennartz,1 Joshua D. Berke,2,3 Ann M. Graybiel,4,5 Rutsuko Ito,6 Carien S. Lansink,1 Matthijs van der Meer,7 A. David Redish,7 Kyle S. Smith,4,5 and Pieter Voorn8 1University of Amsterdam, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences Center for Neuroscience, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2Department of Psychology and 3Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, 4Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and 5McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, 6Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom, 7Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, and 8Department of Anatomy, Research Institute Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands This mini-symposium aims to integrate recent insights from anatomy, behavior, and neurophysiology, highlighting the anatom- ical organization, behavioral significance, and information-processing mechanisms of corticostriatal interactions. In this sum- mary of topics, which is not meant to provide a comprehensive survey, we will first review the anatomy of corticostriatal circuits, comparing different ways by which “loops” of cortical–basal ganglia circuits communicate. Next, we will address the causal importance and systems-neurophysiological mechanisms of corticostriatal interactions for memory, emphasizing the communi- cation between hippocampus and ventral striatum during contextual conditioning. Furthermore, ensemble recording techniques have been applied to compare information processing in the dorsal and ventral striatum to predictions from reinforcement learning theory.
[Show full text]
Medial Temporal Lobe (The Limbic System)
MEDIAL TEMPORAL LOBE (THE LIMBIC SYSTEM) On the medial surface of the temporal lobe are three structures critical for normal human functioning. From rostral to caudal, they are the olfactory cortex, the amygdala, and the hippocampus. We will look at the anatomy and function of each separately, although they are often grouped together as "the limbic system". A. The olfactory system: The olfactory system actually begins in the roof of the nasal cavity. The olfactory receptors are ciliated epithelial cells with an array of receptors capable of detecting thousands of different odors. However, just as with any sensory system, the receptor neurons themselves do not project to the cerebral hemispheres. Their axons project up through the cribiform plate of the skull to synapse on the dendrites of the mitral cells of the olfactory bulb. The axons of the olfactory receptors make up the elusive cranial nerve I. This fragile tract is susceptible to shearing forces in head trauma, and loss of smell is a surprisingly debilitating injury. Here is an example of a section through olfactory bulb. The olfactory bulb is not a simple relay (something which passively transmits the signal), but is a sophisticated structure in itself. The mitral cell- olfactory neuron synapse is actually within a tangle of axons and dendrites that is called a glomerulus. There is a second cell type tucked around these glomeruli which probably affects how the signal is transmitted. These cells are small and densely packed, which gives them the name "granule cells". However, they bear no relation to the granule cells of the cerebellum or cerebral cortex.
[Show full text]
Olfactory Maps, Circuits and Computations
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Olfactory maps, circuits and computations Andrew J Giessel and Sandeep Robert Datta Sensory information in the visual, auditory and somatosensory between local positional features to extract information systems is organized topographically, with key sensory features like object identity, depth and motion [4–6]. Unlike the ordered in space across neural sheets. Despite the existence of a small number of continuous sensory parameters that spatially stereotyped map of odor identity within the olfactory characterize vision, audition and touch (such as position, bulb, it is unclear whether the higher olfactory cortex uses frequency and amplitude), olfactory parameter space is topography to organize information about smells. Here, we poorly deﬁned and highly multidimensional [7]. For review recent work on the anatomy, microcircuitry and example, any given monomolecular odorant can be neuromodulation of two higher-order olfactory areas: the described in terms of its functional groups, molecular piriform cortex and the olfactory tubercle. The piriform is an weight, chain length, bond substitution, resonance fre- archicortical region with an extensive local associational network quency or any number of additional chemical descrip- that constructs representations of odor identity. The olfactory tors. Furthermore, olfactory space is inherently tubercle is an extension of the ventral striatum that may use discrete — not only are individual odorants structurally reward-based learning rules to encode odor valence. We argue unique but many of the molecular descriptors typically that in contrast to brain circuits for other sensory modalities, both used for individual odorants (such as functional group or the piriform and the olfactory tubercle largely discard any bond substitution) cannot be mapped continuously in topography present in the bulb and instead use distributive any scheme for chemical space.
[Show full text]
Variants of Olfactory Memory and Their Dependencies on the Hippocampal Formation
The Journal of Neuroscience, February 1995, f5(2): 1162-i 171 Variants of Olfactory Memory and Their Dependencies on the Hippocampal Formation Ursula Sttiubli,’ To-Tam Le,2 and Gary Lynch* ‘Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003 and *Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, California 92717 Olfactory memory in control rats and in animals with entor- pal pyramidal cells (e.g., Hjorth-Simonsen, 1972; Witter, 1993). hinal cortex lesions was tested in four paradigms: (1) a known Moreover, physiological activity in rat hippocampus becomes correct odor was present in a group of familiar but nonre- synchronized with that in the olfactory bulb and cortex during warded odors, (2) six known correct odors were simulta- odor sampling(Macrides et al., 1982). Theseobservations have neously present in a maze, (3) correct responses required prompted speculationand experimentation concerning the pos- the learning of associations between odors and objects, and sible contributions of the several stagesof the olfactory-hip- (4) six odors, each associated with a choice between two pocampal circuit to the encoding and use of memory. Lesions objects, were presented simultaneously. Control rats had no to the lateral entorhinal cortex, which separatethe hippocampus difficulty with the first problem and avoided repeating se- from its primary source of olfactory input, did not detectably lections in the second; this latter behavior resembles that affect the ability of rats to perform odor discriminations learned reported for spatial mazes but, in the present experiments, prior to surgery although they did disrupt the learning of new was not dependent upon memory for the configuration of discriminations (Staubli et al., 1984, 1986).This result suggested pertinent cues.
[Show full text]
Cortical Layers: What Are They Good For? Neocortex
Cortical Layers: What are they good for? Neocortex L1 L2 L3 network input L4 computations L5 L6 Brodmann Map of Cortical Areas lateral medial 44 areas, numbered in order of samples taken from monkey brain Brodmann, 1908. Primary visual cortex lamination across species Balaram & Kaas 2014 Front Neuroanat Cortical lamination: not always a six-layered structure (archicortex) e.g. Piriform, entorhinal Larriva-Sahd 2010 Front Neuroanat Other layered structures in the brain Cerebellum Retina Complexity of connectivity in a cortical column • Paired-recordings and anatomical reconstructions generate statistics of cortical connectivity Lefort et al. 2009 Information flow in neocortical microcircuits Simplified version “computational Layer 2/3 layer” Layer 4 main output Layer 5 main input Layer 6 Thalamus e - excitatory, i - inhibitory Grillner et al TINS 2005 The canonical cortical circuit MAYBE …. DaCosta & Martin, 2010 Excitatory cell types across layers (rat S1 cortex) Canonical models do not capture the diversity of excitatory cell classes Oberlaender et al., Cereb Cortex. Oct 2012; 22(10): 2375–2391. Coding strategies of different cortical layers Sakata & Harris, Neuron 2010 Canonical models do not capture the diversity of firing rates and selectivities Why is the cortex layered? Do different layers have distinct functions? Is this the right question? Alternative view: • When thinking about layers, we should really be thinking about cell classes • A cells class may be defined by its input connectome and output projectome (and some other properties) • The job of different classes is to (i) make associations between different types of information available in each cortical column and/or (ii) route/gate different streams of information • Layers are convenient way of organising inputs and outputs of distinct cell classes Excitatory cell types across layers (rat S1 cortex) INTRATELENCEPHALIC (IT) | PYRAMIDAL TRACT (PT) | CORTICOTHALAMIC (CT) From Cereb Cortex.
[Show full text]
Perspectives
PERSPECTIVES reptiles, to birds and mammals, to primates OPINION and, finally, to humans — ascending from ‘lower’ to ‘higher’ intelligence in a chrono- logical series. They believed that the brains Avian brains and a new understanding of extant vertebrates retained ancestral structures, and, therefore, that the origin of of vertebrate brain evolution specific human brain subdivisions could be traced back in time by examining the brains of extant non-human vertebrates. In The Avian Brain Nomenclature Consortium* making such comparisons, they noted that the main divisions of the human CNS — Abstract | We believe that names have a pallium is nuclear, and the mammalian the spinal cord, hindbrain, midbrain, thala- powerful influence on the experiments we cortex is laminar in organization, the avian mus, cerebellum and cerebrum or telen- do and the way in which we think. For this pallium supports cognitive abilities similar cephalon — were present in all vertebrates reason, and in the light of new evidence to, and for some species more advanced than, (FIG. 1a). Edinger, however, noted that the about the function and evolution of the those of many mammals. To eliminate these internal organization of the telencephala vertebrate brain, an international consortium misconceptions, an international forum of showed the most pronounced differences of neuroscientists has reconsidered the neuroscientists (BOX 1) has, for the first time between species. In mammals, the outer traditional, 100-year-old terminology that is in 100 years, developed new terminology that part of the telencephalon was found to have used to describe the avian cerebrum. Our more accurately reflects our current under- prominently layered grey matter (FIG.
[Show full text]
Normal Mentality Associated with a Maldeveloped " Rhinencephalon " by P
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.13.3.191 on 1 August 1950. Downloaded from J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1950, 13, 191. NORMAL MENTALITY ASSOCIATED WITH A MALDEVELOPED " RHINENCEPHALON " BY P. W. NATHAN and MARION C. SMITH Fronm the Neurological Research Unit of the Medical Research Coulncil, National Hospital. Queen Square, London In 1937 Papez published his views on the Case Report functions of the gyrus fornicatus. He summarized The specimen is the brain of a man, aged 34, who died them as follows. of a chondrosarcoma of the ileum. He was one of a series of cases under investigation in a programme of " It is proposed that the hypothalamus, the anterior thalamic nuclei, the gyrus cinguli, the hippocampus, research concerned with operations for the relief of and their inter-connexions constitute a harmonious pain. As many hours had been devoted to the testing mechanism which may elaborate the functions of of sensation and the discussion of signs and symptoms, central emotion, as well as participate in emotional our knowledge of the patient, which extended over a expression." period of six months, was much greater than that Bilateral temporal lobectomies performed on acquired in most routine cases. Protected by copyright. and Bucy in 1939 gave evidence No abnormality of development had been suspected monkeys by Kiuver during the patient's life, for he came well within normal supporting Papez' general hypothesis. The effects limits from intellectual and psychological points of of extensive lesions of the hippocampus-fornix view. His mother had remained well during pregnancy, system in cats and dogs were reported by Spiegel, and his birth was normal.
[Show full text]
Synaptic Organization of Anterior Olfactory Nucleus Inputs to Piriform Cortex
9414 • The Journal of Neuroscience, December 2, 2020 • 40(49):9414–9425 Systems/Circuits Synaptic Organization of Anterior Olfactory Nucleus Inputs to Piriform Cortex Marco J. Russo,1 Kevin M. Franks,1 Roxanne Oghaz,1 Richard Axel,2 and Steven A. Siegelbaum3 1Department of Neuroscience, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, 2Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Department of Neuroscience, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, and 3Department of Neuroscience, Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Department of Pharmacology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York Odors activate distributed ensembles of neurons within the piriform cortex, forming cortical representations of odor thought to be essential to olfactory learning and behaviors. This odor response is driven by direct input from the olfactory bulb, but is also shaped by a dense network of associative or intracortical inputs to piriform, which may enhance or constrain the cort- ical odor representation. With optogenetic techniques, it is possible to functionally isolate defined inputs to piriform cortex and assess their potential to activate or inhibit piriform pyramidal neurons. The anterior olfactory nucleus (AON) receives direct input from the olfactory bulb and sends an associative projection to piriform cortex that has potential roles in the state-dependent processing of olfactory behaviors. Here, we provide a detailed functional assessment of the AON afferents to piriform in male and female C57Bl/6J mice. We confirm that the AON forms glutamatergic excitatory synapses onto piriform pyramidal neurons; and while these inputs are not as strong as piriform recurrent collaterals, they are less constrained by disynaptic inhibition.
[Show full text]
On the Scent of Human Olfactory Orbitofrontal Cortex: Meta-Analysis and Comparison to Non-Human Primates
Brain Research Reviews 50 (2005) 287 – 304 www.elsevier.com/locate/brainresrev Review On the scent of human olfactory orbitofrontal cortex: Meta-analysis and comparison to non-human primates Jay A. Gottfrieda,*, David H. Zaldb aDepartment of Neurology and the Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 320 E. Superior St., Searle 11-453, Chicago, IL 60611, USA bDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA Accepted 25 August 2005 Available online 6 October 2005 Abstract It is widely accepted that the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) represents the main neocortical target of primary olfactory cortex. In non-human primates, the olfactory neocortex is situated along the basal surface of the caudal frontal lobes, encompassing agranular and dysgranular OFC medially and agranular insula laterally, where this latter structure wraps onto the posterior orbital surface. Direct afferent inputs arrive from most primary olfactory areas, including piriform cortex, amygdala, and entorhinal cortex, in the absence of an obligatory thalamic relay. While such findings are almost exclusively derived from animal data, recent cytoarchitectonic studies indicate a close anatomical correspondence between non-human primate and human OFC. Given this cross-species conservation of structure, it has generally been presumed that the olfactory projection area in human OFC occupies the same posterior portions of OFC as seen in non-human primates. This review questions this assumption by providing a critical survey of the localization of primate and human olfactory neocortex. Based on a meta-analysis of human functional neuroimaging studies, the region of human OFC showing the greatest olfactory responsivity appears substantially rostral and in a different cytoarchitectural area than the orbital olfactory regions as defined in the monkey.
[Show full text]