Prednisolone Versus Dexamethasone for Croup: a Randomized Controlled Trial Colin M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prednisolone Versus Dexamethasone for Croup: a Randomized Controlled Trial Colin M Prednisolone Versus Dexamethasone for Croup: a Randomized Controlled Trial Colin M. Parker, MBChB, DCH, MRCPCH, FACEM,a,b Matthew N. Cooper, BCA, BSc, PhDc OBJECTIVES: The use of either prednisolone or low-dose dexamethasone in the treatment of abstract childhood croup lacks a rigorous evidence base despite widespread use. In this study, we compare dexamethasone at 0.6 mg/kg with both low-dose dexamethasone at 0.15 mg/kg and prednisolone at 1 mg/kg. METHODS: Prospective, double-blind, noninferiority randomized controlled trial based in 1 tertiary pediatric emergency department and 1 urban district emergency department in Perth, Western Australia. Inclusions were age .6 months, maximum weight 20 kg, contactable by telephone, and English-speaking caregivers. Exclusion criteria were known prednisolone or dexamethasone allergy, immunosuppressive disease or treatment, steroid therapy or enrollment in the study within the previous 14 days, and a high clinical suspicion of an alternative diagnosis. A total of 1252 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg; n = 410), low-dose dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg; n = 410), or prednisolone (1 mg/kg; n = 411). Primary outcome measures included Westley Croup Score 1-hour after treatment and unscheduled medical re-attendance during the 7 days after treatment. RESULTS: Mean Westley Croup Score at baseline was 1.4 for dexamethasone, 1.5 for low-dose dexamethasone, and 1.5 for prednisolone. Adjusted difference in scores at 1 hour, compared with dexamethasone, was 0.03 (95% confidence interval 20.09 to 0.15) for low-dose dexamethasone and 0.05 (95% confidence interval 20.07 to 0.17) for prednisolone. Re- attendance rates were 17.8% for dexamethasone, 19.5% for low-dose dexamethasone, and 21.7% for prednisolone (not significant [P = .59 and .19]). CONCLUSIONS: Noninferiority was demonstrated for both low-dose dexamethasone and prednisolone. The type of oral steroid seems to have no clinically significant impact on efficacy, both acutely and during the week after treatment. WHAT’S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Although dexamethasone at 0.6 mg/kg is aPerth Children’s Hospital, Perth, Australia; bJoondalup Health Campus, Perth, Australia; and cTelethon Kids an established evidence-based treatment of childhood croup (reducing Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia hospital admissions, length of stay, and need for endotracheal intubation), Dr Parker conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated and supervised data collection, alternative corticosteroid regimes are in widespread use based on evidence from small studies and observational data. drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr Cooper performed the statistical analysis of the data and reviewed and revised the manuscript; and both authors WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: With our study, we confirm that prednisolone at approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of 1 mg/kg and dexamethasone at 0.15 mg/kg are both noninferior to the work. dexamethasone at 0.6 mg/kg for the treatment of croup in children. We found no difference between groups for both acute croup severity and This trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://www. unscheduled medical re-attendance after treatment. anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id = 83722) (identifier ACTRN12609000290291). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3772 To cite: Parker CM and Cooper MN. Prednisolone Versus Dexamethasone for Croup: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Accepted for publication Jun 17, 2019 Pediatrics. 2019;144(3):e20183772 Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 27, 2021 PEDIATRICS Volume 144, number 3, September 2019:e20183772 ARTICLE The efficacy and safety of 1mg/kgpoforcroupinpatients urban EDs: Princess Margaret corticosteroids for the treatment of receiving intubation14 suggests that Hospital for Children (a tertiary croup has established their use as acomparableglucocorticoiddoseof pediatric center) and Joondalup routine therapy for the emergency dexamethasone (∼0.15 mg/kg) should Health Campus (an urban district department (ED) management of be equally effective.15 hospital). Hospital research ethics – croup,1 3 including, at our own committee approval was obtained at Prednisolone (1 mg/kg) has been institution, all ED attendances for both centers, and the study was 4 shown in 1 study to shorten the time croup. Steroid treatments have been registered with the Australian New to extubation for patients with croup shown to significantly decrease the rate Zealand Clinical Trials Registry in intensive care.14 Many centers of hospital admission, length of hospital (identifier ACTRN12609000290291). therefore use oral prednisolone for stay, return visits, endotracheal De-identified individual participant the ED management of croup as intubation, and admission to ICUs in data will not be made available. – a more readily available alternative to patients with croup.5 9 Although dexamethasone.16 The type and dose Participants different routes of corticosteroid of corticosteroid treatment of croup administration have been used, Patients were a convenience sample depends largely on geographic including nebulized, intramuscular, and of children presenting to either of the location because different centers intravenous dosing, the oral route has EDs with croup during the study preferentially administer different many advantages and is the preferred period (March 2009–July 2012). The drugs and doses. There have only route in many centers.10,11 The disease state was defined as a clinical been 3 small randomized controlled clinician treating children with croup diagnosis of croup (laryngotracheitis) trials used to compare oral may further consider the type and dose by the ED doctor after a history and dexamethasone with oral of oral steroid. 16 physical examination. If there was any prednisolone. Fifoot and Ting found diagnostic uncertainty, clinicians Although early trials revealed safety no difference between the 2 could refer to a Guidance for Doctors and efficacy with intramuscular treatments, and an earlier study by 17 information sheet (Supplemental dexamethasone at a dose of Sparrow and Geelhoed of 133 Information), in which a croup 0.6 mg/kg,6 subsequent studies children with mild to moderate croup diagnosis is defined as a hoarse voice revealed efficacy of oral revealed that children treated with or barking cough and stridor (with or dexamethasone,7 and there is evidence prednisolone (1 mg/kg po) were without increased work of breathing) that smaller doses of dexamethasone more likely to seek unscheduled directly observed or elicited in the (0.3and0.15mg/kgpo)maybe follow-up for medical care than history. Inclusion criteria were age fi 12 children treated with dexamethasone . equally ef cacious. The lower oral 18 6 months, contactable by telephone, dose of 0.15 mg/kg has been accepted (0.15 mg/kg po). Garbutt et al and English-speaking caregivers. A and implemented in some centers2; found no difference in duration of maximum weight of 20 kg was however, the limited number of croup symptoms or additional health imposed to limit the maximum supporting studies7,12 raises the care when comparing a single dose of possible dexamethasone dose to question of efficacy compared with dexamethasone with 3 days of 12 mg (adult dose). Exclusion criteria adoseof0.6mg/kgpo,9,13 particularly prednisolone treatment. included known prednisolone or around the power of these studies to In this study, we aim to compare the dexamethasone allergy, detect small, but clinically important, traditional, evidence-supported gold immunosuppressive disease or differences in outcomes. Notably, the standard croup treatment, treatment, steroid therapy or 12 studies by Geelhoed and Macdonald dexamethasone at a dose of enrollment in the same study within had only 80% power (at the 5% 0.6 mg/kg, with 2 alternate the previous 14 days, and a high fi signi cance level) to detect a doubling treatments already in widespread clinical suspicion of an alternative fi in the duration of hospitalization, use, namely lower-dose diagnosis, with speci c prompts to which would only reveal a relatively dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg) and include bacterial tracheitis, inhaled large clinical difference between prednisolone (1 mg/kg), and assess foreign body, retropharyngeal treatments. On the other hand, the these treatments for noninferiority. abscess, epiglottitis, angioedema, lower dose is supported by almost 3 vascular ring, and subglottic stenosis. decades of clinical experience at our Signed consent was obtained from institution, indicating no rise in the rate METHODS caregivers by the treating doctor after of intubation or admission to intensive the doctor provided a standardized care after a reduction of the dose to Design information sheet (Croup Study: 0.15 mg/kg po.4 The well-proven We conducted a prospective, double- Information for Parents, see efficacy of prednisolone in a dose of blind, randomized controlled trial at 2 Supplemental Information). Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 27, 2021 2 PARKER and COOPER Interventions second primary outcome was noninferiority (by using a 2-sided t a Patients were randomly assigned to 1 unscheduled medical re-attendance test; common SD of 1.8; = .05). (for any reason) during the 7 days The expected re-attendance rate for of 3 interventions: dexamethasone 4 (0.6 mg/kg; standard
Recommended publications
  • The National Drugs List
    ^ ^ ^ ^ ^[ ^ The National Drugs List Of Syrian Arab Republic Sexth Edition 2006 ! " # "$ % &'() " # * +$, -. / & 0 /+12 3 4" 5 "$ . "$ 67"5,) 0 " /! !2 4? @ % 88 9 3: " # "$ ;+<=2 – G# H H2 I) – 6( – 65 : A B C "5 : , D )* . J!* HK"3 H"$ T ) 4 B K<) +$ LMA N O 3 4P<B &Q / RS ) H< C4VH /430 / 1988 V W* < C A GQ ") 4V / 1000 / C4VH /820 / 2001 V XX K<# C ,V /500 / 1992 V "!X V /946 / 2004 V Z < C V /914 / 2003 V ) < ] +$, [2 / ,) @# @ S%Q2 J"= [ &<\ @ +$ LMA 1 O \ . S X '( ^ & M_ `AB @ &' 3 4" + @ V= 4 )\ " : N " # "$ 6 ) G" 3Q + a C G /<"B d3: C K7 e , fM 4 Q b"$ " < $\ c"7: 5) G . HHH3Q J # Hg ' V"h 6< G* H5 !" # $%" & $' ,* ( )* + 2 ا اوا ادو +% 5 j 2 i1 6 B J' 6<X " 6"[ i2 "$ "< * i3 10 6 i4 11 6! ^ i5 13 6<X "!# * i6 15 7 G!, 6 - k 24"$d dl ?K V *4V h 63[46 ' i8 19 Adl 20 "( 2 i9 20 G Q) 6 i10 20 a 6 m[, 6 i11 21 ?K V $n i12 21 "% * i13 23 b+ 6 i14 23 oe C * i15 24 !, 2 6\ i16 25 C V pq * i17 26 ( S 6) 1, ++ &"r i19 3 +% 27 G 6 ""% i19 28 ^ Ks 2 i20 31 % Ks 2 i21 32 s * i22 35 " " * i23 37 "$ * i24 38 6" i25 39 V t h Gu* v!* 2 i26 39 ( 2 i27 40 B w< Ks 2 i28 40 d C &"r i29 42 "' 6 i30 42 " * i31 42 ":< * i32 5 ./ 0" -33 4 : ANAESTHETICS $ 1 2 -1 :GENERAL ANAESTHETICS AND OXYGEN 4 $1 2 2- ATRACURIUM BESYLATE DROPERIDOL ETHER FENTANYL HALOTHANE ISOFLURANE KETAMINE HCL NITROUS OXIDE OXYGEN PROPOFOL REMIFENTANIL SEVOFLURANE SUFENTANIL THIOPENTAL :LOCAL ANAESTHETICS !67$1 2 -5 AMYLEINE HCL=AMYLOCAINE ARTICAINE BENZOCAINE BUPIVACAINE CINCHOCAINE LIDOCAINE MEPIVACAINE OXETHAZAINE PRAMOXINE PRILOCAINE PREOPERATIVE MEDICATION & SEDATION FOR 9*: ;< " 2 -8 : : SHORT -TERM PROCEDURES ATROPINE DIAZEPAM INJ.
    [Show full text]
  • Docetaxel with Prednisone Or Prednisolone for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer ISSN 1366-5278 Feedback Your Views About This Report
    Health Technology Assessment Health Technology Health Technology Assessment 2007; Vol. 11: No. 2 2007; 11: No. 2 Vol. Docetaxel with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of prostate cancer A systematic review and economic model of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of docetaxel in combination with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer Feedback The HTA Programme and the authors would like to know R Collins, E Fenwick, R Trowman, R Perard, your views about this report. The Correspondence Page on the HTA website G Norman, K Light, A Birtle, S Palmer (http://www.hta.ac.uk) is a convenient way to publish and R Riemsma your comments. If you prefer, you can send your comments to the address below, telling us whether you would like us to transfer them to the website. We look forward to hearing from you. January 2007 The National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Mailpoint 728, Boldrewood, Health Technology Assessment University of Southampton, NHS R&D HTA Programme Southampton, SO16 7PX, UK. HTA Fax: +44 (0) 23 8059 5639 Email: [email protected] www.hta.ac.uk http://www.hta.ac.uk ISSN 1366-5278 HTA How to obtain copies of this and other HTA Programme reports. An electronic version of this publication, in Adobe Acrobat format, is available for downloading free of charge for personal use from the HTA website (http://www.hta.ac.uk). A fully searchable CD-ROM is also available (see below). Printed copies of HTA monographs cost £20 each (post and packing free in the UK) to both public and private sector purchasers from our Despatch Agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Penetration of Synthetic Corticosteroids Into Human Aqueous Humour
    Eye (1990) 4, 526--530 Penetration of Synthetic Corticosteroids into Human Aqueous Humour C. N. 1. McGHEE,1.3 D. G. WATSON, 3 1. M. MIDGLEY, 3 M. 1. NOBLE, 2 G. N. DUTTON, z A. I. FERNl Glasgow Summary The penetration of prednisolone acetate (1%) and fluorometholone alcohol (0.1%) into human aqueous humour following topical application was determined using the very sensitive and specific technique of Gas Chromatography with Mass Spec­ trometry (GCMS). Prednisolone acetate afforded peak mean concentrations of 669.9 ng/ml within two hours and levels of 28.6 ng/ml in aqueous humour were detected almost 24 hours post application. The peak aqueous humour level of flu­ orometholone was S.lng/ml. The results are compared and contrasted with the absorption of dexamethasone alcohol (0.1%), betamethasone sodium phosphate (0.1 %) and prednisolone sodium phosphate (0.5%) into human aqueous humour. Topical corticosteroid preparations have been prednisolone acetate (1.0%) and fluorometh­ used widely in ophthalmology since the early alone alcohol (0.1 %) (preliminary results) 1960s and over the last 10 years the choice of into the aqueous humour of patients under­ preparations has become larger and more going elective cataract surgery. varied. Unfortunately, data on the intraocular penetration of these steroids in humans has SUbjects and Methods not paralleled the expansion in the number of Patients who were scheduled to undergo rou­ available preparations; indeed until recently, tine cataract surgery were recruited to the estimation of intraocular penetration has study and informed consent was obtained in been reliant upon extrapolation of data from all cases (n=88), Patients with corneal disease animal models (see Watson et ai., 1988, for or inflammatory ocular conditions which bibliography).
    [Show full text]
  • Mifepristone
    1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Mifegyne 200 mg tablets 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each tablet contains 200-mg mifepristone. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Tablet. Light yellow, cylindrical, bi-convex tablets, with a diameter of 11 mm with “167 B” engraved on one side. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS For termination of pregnancy, the anti-progesterone mifepristone and the prostaglandin analogue can only be prescribed and administered in accordance with New Zealand’s abortion laws and regulations. 4.1 Therapeutic indications 1- Medical termination of developing intra-uterine pregnancy. In sequential use with a prostaglandin analogue, up to 63 days of amenorrhea (see section 4.2). 2- Softening and dilatation of the cervix uteri prior to surgical termination of pregnancy during the first trimester. 3- Preparation for the action of prostaglandin analogues in the termination of pregnancy for medical reasons (beyond the first trimester). 4- Labour induction in fetal death in utero. In patients where prostaglandin or oxytocin cannot be used. 4.2 Dose and Method of Administration Dose 1- Medical termination of developing intra-uterine pregnancy The method of administration will be as follows: • Up to 49 days of amenorrhea: 1 Mifepristone is taken as a single 600 mg (i.e. 3 tablets of 200 mg each) oral dose, followed 36 to 48 hours later, by the administration of the prostaglandin analogue: misoprostol 400 µg orally or per vaginum. • Between 50-63 days of amenorrhea Mifepristone is taken as a single 600 mg (i.e. 3 tablets of 200 mg each) oral dose, followed 36 to 48 hours later, by the administration of misoprostol.
    [Show full text]
  • Opposing Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone And
    European Journal of Endocrinology (2000) 143 687±695 ISSN 0804-4643 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY Opposing effects of dehydroepiandrosterone and dexamethasone on the generation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells M O Canning, K Grotenhuis, H J de Wit and H A Drexhage Department of Immunology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands (Correspondence should be addressed to H A Drexhage, Lab Ee 838, Department of Immunology, Erasmus University, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Background: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) has been suggested as an immunostimulating steroid hormone, of which the effects on the development of dendritic cells (DC) are unknown. The effects of DHEA often oppose those of the other adrenal glucocorticoid, cortisol. Glucocorticoids (GC) are known to suppress the immune response at different levels and have recently been shown to modulate the development of DC, thereby influencing the initiation of the immune response. Variations in the duration of exposure to, and doses of, GC (particularly dexamethasone (DEX)) however, have resulted in conflicting effects on DC development. Aim: In this study, we describe the effects of a continuous high level of exposure to the adrenal steroid DHEA (1026 M) on the generation of immature DC from monocytes, as well as the effects of the opposing steroid DEX on this development. Results: The continuous presence of DHEA (1026 M) in GM-CSF/IL-4-induced monocyte-derived DC cultures resulted in immature DC with a morphology and functional capabilities similar to those of typical immature DC (T cell stimulation, IL-12/IL-10 production), but with a slightly altered phenotype of increased CD80 and decreased CD43 expression (markers of maturity).
    [Show full text]
  • Steroid Use in Prednisone Allergy Abby Shuck, Pharmd Candidate
    Steroid Use in Prednisone Allergy Abby Shuck, PharmD candidate 2015 University of Findlay If a patient has an allergy to prednisone and methylprednisolone, what (if any) other corticosteroid can the patient use to avoid an allergic reaction? Corticosteroids very rarely cause allergic reactions in patients that receive them. Since corticosteroids are typically used to treat severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis, it seems unlikely that these drugs could actually induce an allergic reaction of their own. However, between 0.5-5% of people have reported any sort of reaction to a corticosteroid that they have received.1 Corticosteroids can cause anything from minor skin irritations to full blown anaphylactic shock. Worsening of allergic symptoms during corticosteroid treatment may not always mean that the patient has failed treatment, although it may appear to be so.2,3 There are essentially four classes of corticosteroids: Class A, hydrocortisone-type, Class B, triamcinolone acetonide type, Class C, betamethasone type, and Class D, hydrocortisone-17-butyrate and clobetasone-17-butyrate type. Major* corticosteroids in Class A include cortisone, hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, and prednisone. Major* corticosteroids in Class B include budesonide, fluocinolone, and triamcinolone. Major* corticosteroids in Class C include beclomethasone and dexamethasone. Finally, major* corticosteroids in Class D include betamethasone, fluticasone, and mometasone.4,5 Class D was later subdivided into Class D1 and D2 depending on the presence or 5,6 absence of a C16 methyl substitution and/or halogenation on C9 of the steroid B-ring. It is often hard to determine what exactly a patient is allergic to if they experience a reaction to a corticosteroid.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Product Characteristics
    Prednisolone, DK/H/2488/001-006, March 2021 SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT /…/ 2.5 mg tablets /…/ 5 mg tablets /…/ 10 mg tablets /…/ 20 mg tablets /…/ 25 mg tablets /…/ 30 mg tablets 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each tablet contains 2.5 mg prednisolone. Each tablet contains 5 mg prednisolone. Each tablet contains 10 mg prednisolone. Each tablet contains 20 mg prednisolone. Each tablet contains 25 mg prednisolone. Each tablet contains 30 mg prednisolone. Excipient with known effect: Each 2.5 mg tablet contains 89.2 mg of lactose monohydrate Each 5 mg tablet contains 87.2 mg of lactose monohydrate Each 10 mg tablet contains 81.7 mg of lactose monohydrate Each 20 mg tablet contains 163.4 mg of lactose monohydrate Each 25 mg tablet contains 159.4 mg of lactose monohydrate Each 30 mg tablet contains 153.4 mg of lactose monohydrate For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Tablets 2.5mg tablet Yellow, 7mm, round, flat, tablet, with a score line on one side, imprinted with “A610” on one side and “2.5” on the other. 5mg tablet White, 7mm, round, flat, tablet, with a score line on one side, imprinted with “A620” on one side and “5” on the other. 10mg tablet Red, 7mm, round, flat, tablet, with a score line on one side, imprinted with “A630” on one side and “10” on the other. 20mg tablet Red, 9mm, round, flat, tablet, with a score line on one side, imprinted with “A640” on one side and “20” on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacokinetics of Ophthalmic Corticosteroids
    British Journal ofOphthalmology 1992; 76: 681-684 681 MINI REVIEW Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.76.11.681 on 1 November 1992. Downloaded from Pharmacokinetics of ophthalmic corticosteroids Corticosteroids have been used by ophthalmologists with an identical vehicle, the aqueous humour concentrations of increasing frequency over the past 30 years, with the these steroids are almost identical.'9 None the less it is concomitant development of a diverse range of drop, essential when considering such empirical data, to recall that ointment, subconjunctival, and oral preparations. Though the systemic anti-inflammatory effect of both betamethasone the clinical benefits and side effects of such corticosteroid and dexamethasone is five to seven times that of predniso- preparations have been well documented, their basic lone.39"' The local anti-inflammatory potency of ocular pharmacokinetics in the human eye have yet to be fully steroids has yet to be fully investigated and whilst early work established. Indeed most of our pharmacokinetic knowledge suggested that prednisolone acetate 1% had the greatest anti- of these drugs has been elucidated by extrapolation of data inflammatory effect in experimental keratitis,'7 later studies obtained from rabbit experiments.1-26 These results can be demonstrated that fluorometholone acetate in a 1% formu- significantly disparate from human data because of the lation was equally efficacious in the same model.26 However, thinner rabbit cornea, lower rabbit blink rate, effect of prednisolone
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigations in Selected Haemostatic Parameters in Administration of Graded Doses of Dexamethasone and Its Blockers in Wister
    ogy iol : Cu ys r h re P n t & R Anatomy & Physiology: Current y e s m e o a t Nwangwa et al., Anat Physiol 2018, 8:2 r a c n h A Research DOI: 10.4172/2161-0940.1000297 ISSN: 2161-0940 Research Article Open Access Mitigations in Selected Haemostatic Parameters in Administration of Graded Doses of Dexamethasone and its Blockers in Wister Rats Nwangwa EK and Odigie OM* Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria *Corresponding author: Odigie OM, Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria, E-mail: [email protected] Received date: May 07, 2018; Accepted date: May 25, 2018; Published date: May 29, 2018 Copyright: © 2018 Nwangwa EK, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Clinical trials have shown that an even newer compound, dexamethasone (Dex), might be more potent and less likely to cause side-effects than any other known corticosteroid medication. This study investigated the possible changes in selected haemostatic parameters [clotting time, bleeding time, platelets count and fibrinogen level] in albino wistar rats, following administration of graded doses of Dex. Forty-two male albino Wistar rats were randomly grouped into seven of six rats each. With Group A receiving normal diets (Control), Groups B-G were respectively given 0.1 mg/Kg of Dex, 0.3 mg/Kg of Dex, 0.1 mg/Kg of Dex +33 mg/Kg of Ketokonazol (Keto), 0.3 mg/Kg of Dex +33 mg/Kg of Keto, 0.1 mg/Kg of Dex+Vitamin (Vit) E and 0.1 mg/Kg of Dex.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate on Counterregulatory Responses During Repeated Hypoglycemia in Conscious Normal Rats Darleen A
    The Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate on Counterregulatory Responses During Repeated Hypoglycemia in Conscious Normal Rats Darleen A. Sandoval, Ling Ping, Ray Anthony Neill, Sachiko Morrey, and Stephen N. Davis ␮ ⅐ ؊1 ⅐ ؊1 We previously determined that both antecedent hy- mol/l kg min ; P < 0.05). In summary, day-1 poglycemia and elevated cortisol levels blunt neu- antecedent hypoglycemia blunted neuroendocrine and roendocrine and metabolic responses to subsequent metabolic responses to next-day hypoglycemia. How- hypoglycemia in conscious, unrestrained rats. The adre- ever, simultaneous DHEA-S infusion during antecedent nal steroid dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) hypoglycemia preserved neuroendocrine and metabolic has been shown in several studies to oppose corticoste- counterregulatory responses during subsequent hypo- roid action. The purpose of this study was to determine glycemia in conscious rats. Diabetes 53:679–686, 2004 if DHEA-S could preserve counterregulatory responses during repeated hypoglycemia. We studied 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats during a series of 2-day protocols. he Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Day 1 consisted of two 2-h episodes of 1) hyperinsuline- mic (30 pmol ⅐ kg؊1 ⅐ min؊1) euglycemia (6.2 ؎ 0.2 established that intensive glucose control in type ANTE EUG), 2) hyperinsulinemic eug- 1 diabetic patients can slow the progression or ;12 ؍ mmol/l; n -plus simultaneous Tsignificantly reduce the onset of diabetic micro (8 ؍ lycemia (6.0 ؎ 0.1 mmol/l; n intravenous infusion of DHEA-S (30 mg/kg; ANTE EUG vascular complications (e.g., retinopathy, nephropathy, ؉ DHEA-S), 3) hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (2.8 ؎ neuropathy) (1). Unfortunately, the study also established ANTE HYPO), or 4) hyperinsulinemic that intensive glucose treatment causes an approximate ;12 ؍ mmol/l; n 0.1 -with simulta- threefold increase in the frequency of severe hypoglyce (8 ؍ hypoglycemia (2.8 ؎ 0.1 mmol/l; n neous intravenous infusion of DHEA-S (30 mg/kg; ANTE mia (2).
    [Show full text]
  • Ophthalmic Steroids Reference Number: OH.PHAR.PPA.100 Effective Date: 01/01/2021 Revision Log Last Review Date: 11.20 Line of Business: Medicaid
    Clinical Policy: Ophthalmic Agents: Ophthalmic Steroids Reference Number: OH.PHAR.PPA.100 Effective Date: 01/01/2021 Revision Log Last Review Date: 11.20 Line of Business: Medicaid See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description Ophthalmic Agents: Ophthalmic Steroids NO PA REQUIRED “PREFERRED” PA REQUIRED “NON-PREFERRED” DEXAMETHASONE SODIUM PHOSPHATE ALREX® (loteprednol etabonate) DUREZOL® (difluprednate) FLAREX® (fluorometholone acetate) FLUOROMETHOLONE INVELTYS® (loteprednol etabonate) FML FORTE® (fluorometholone) LOTEMAX® (loteprednol etabonate) FML S.O.P. ® (fluorometholone) LOTEMAX® SM (loteprednol etabonate) PRED MILD® (prednisolone acetate) LOTEPREDNOL PREDNISOLONE ACETATE MAXIDEX® (dexamethasone sodium phosphate) PREDNISOLONE SODIUM PHOSPHATE FDA approved indication(s) Alrex is indicated for: • Temporary relief of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis Durezol is indicated for: • Treatment of postoperative ocular pain and postoperative ocular inflammation • Treatment of endogenous anterior uveitis Flarex, fluorometholone, FML Forte, and FML S.O.P are indicated for: • Treatment of corticosteroid-responsive ophthalmic disorders including allergic conjunctivitis, ocular burns or trauma due to corneal injury resulting from chemical, thermal or penetration trauma, giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC), keratitis, postoperative ocular inflammation, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and chronic anterior uveitis Inveltys is indicated for: • Treatment of postoperative
    [Show full text]
  • And Function by Progesterone TLR4-Mediated Dendritic Cell
    Differential Modulation of TLR3- and TLR4-Mediated Dendritic Cell Maturation and Function by Progesterone This information is current as Leigh A. Jones, Shrook Kreem, Muhannad Shweash, of September 23, 2021. Andrew Paul, James Alexander and Craig W. Roberts J Immunol 2010; 185:4525-4534; Prepublished online 15 September 2010; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901155 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/185/8/4525 Downloaded from Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2010/09/13/jimmunol.090115 Material 5.DC1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ References This article cites 56 articles, 12 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/185/8/4525.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision by guest on September 23, 2021 • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2010 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Differential Modulation of TLR3- and TLR4-Mediated Dendritic Cell Maturation and Function by Progesterone Leigh A.
    [Show full text]