Ophthalmic Steroids Reference Number: OH.PHAR.PPA.100 Effective Date: 01/01/2021 Revision Log Last Review Date: 11.20 Line of Business: Medicaid
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Therapeutic and Inducing Effect of Corneal Crosslinking on Infectious
Differenteffectsofcornealcrosslinkingoninfectiouskeratitis 窑Review窑 Therapeuticandinducingeffectofcornealcrosslinking oninfectiouskeratitis 1DepartmentofOphthalmology,ShandongProvincial thecornealintrinsicbiomechanicalpropertyandthestiffness HospitalAffiliatedtoShandongUniversity,Jinan250000, ofcorneatoresistectasiaofcornea [1].Besidesitsoriginal ShandongProvince,China applicationforthekeratoconusandkeratectasia [2],CXLhas 2DepartmentofOphthalmology,thePeople'sHospitalof beenutilizedontothetreatmentofinfectiouskeratitis [3], Linyi,Linyi276000,ShandongProvince,China nowadays.Althoughthesecondaryinfectiouskeratitisafter 3DepartmentofPediatrics,thePeople'sHospitalofLinyi, CXLisrare,therearesomereportsonsecondarykeratitis Linyi276000,ShandongProvince,China infectedby bacteria,fungi,herpessimplexvirusand Co-firstauthors: Liang-ZhuJiangandShi-YanQiu Acanthamoeba.ThisrarecomplicationofCXLcancause Correspondence to: Guo-YingMu.Departmentof seriousocularmorbidityandhaveasubsequentdamaging Ophthalmology,ShandongProvincialHospitalAffiliatedto effectonthepatient'svision.ThesurgicaltechniqueofCXL ShandongUniversity,Jinan250000,ShandongProvince, involvestheremovalofepitheliumintraoperativelyandthe [email protected] applicationofcontactlenspostoperatively.Thesefactors Received:2015-06-30Accepted:2016-08-09 havebeenassociatedwiththeoccurrenceofinfectious keratitisafterCXL.Inpresentstudy,wesummarizedthe Abstract therapeuticeffectofCXLoninfectiouskeratitisandthe · Thecornealcrosslinking (CXL)withriboflavinand keratitissecondarytocorneaCXLreportedbyprevious -
Docetaxel with Prednisone Or Prednisolone for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer ISSN 1366-5278 Feedback Your Views About This Report
Health Technology Assessment Health Technology Health Technology Assessment 2007; Vol. 11: No. 2 2007; 11: No. 2 Vol. Docetaxel with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of prostate cancer A systematic review and economic model of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of docetaxel in combination with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer Feedback The HTA Programme and the authors would like to know R Collins, E Fenwick, R Trowman, R Perard, your views about this report. The Correspondence Page on the HTA website G Norman, K Light, A Birtle, S Palmer (http://www.hta.ac.uk) is a convenient way to publish and R Riemsma your comments. If you prefer, you can send your comments to the address below, telling us whether you would like us to transfer them to the website. We look forward to hearing from you. January 2007 The National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Mailpoint 728, Boldrewood, Health Technology Assessment University of Southampton, NHS R&D HTA Programme Southampton, SO16 7PX, UK. HTA Fax: +44 (0) 23 8059 5639 Email: [email protected] www.hta.ac.uk http://www.hta.ac.uk ISSN 1366-5278 HTA How to obtain copies of this and other HTA Programme reports. An electronic version of this publication, in Adobe Acrobat format, is available for downloading free of charge for personal use from the HTA website (http://www.hta.ac.uk). A fully searchable CD-ROM is also available (see below). Printed copies of HTA monographs cost £20 each (post and packing free in the UK) to both public and private sector purchasers from our Despatch Agents. -
Prednisolone Versus Dexamethasone for Croup: a Randomized Controlled Trial Colin M
Prednisolone Versus Dexamethasone for Croup: a Randomized Controlled Trial Colin M. Parker, MBChB, DCH, MRCPCH, FACEM,a,b Matthew N. Cooper, BCA, BSc, PhDc OBJECTIVES: The use of either prednisolone or low-dose dexamethasone in the treatment of abstract childhood croup lacks a rigorous evidence base despite widespread use. In this study, we compare dexamethasone at 0.6 mg/kg with both low-dose dexamethasone at 0.15 mg/kg and prednisolone at 1 mg/kg. METHODS: Prospective, double-blind, noninferiority randomized controlled trial based in 1 tertiary pediatric emergency department and 1 urban district emergency department in Perth, Western Australia. Inclusions were age .6 months, maximum weight 20 kg, contactable by telephone, and English-speaking caregivers. Exclusion criteria were known prednisolone or dexamethasone allergy, immunosuppressive disease or treatment, steroid therapy or enrollment in the study within the previous 14 days, and a high clinical suspicion of an alternative diagnosis. A total of 1252 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg; n = 410), low-dose dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg; n = 410), or prednisolone (1 mg/kg; n = 411). Primary outcome measures included Westley Croup Score 1-hour after treatment and unscheduled medical re-attendance during the 7 days after treatment. RESULTS: Mean Westley Croup Score at baseline was 1.4 for dexamethasone, 1.5 for low-dose dexamethasone, and 1.5 for prednisolone. Adjusted difference in scores at 1 hour, compared with dexamethasone, was 0.03 (95% confidence interval 20.09 to 0.15) for low-dose dexamethasone and 0.05 (95% confidence interval 20.07 to 0.17) for prednisolone. -
Penetration of Synthetic Corticosteroids Into Human Aqueous Humour
Eye (1990) 4, 526--530 Penetration of Synthetic Corticosteroids into Human Aqueous Humour C. N. 1. McGHEE,1.3 D. G. WATSON, 3 1. M. MIDGLEY, 3 M. 1. NOBLE, 2 G. N. DUTTON, z A. I. FERNl Glasgow Summary The penetration of prednisolone acetate (1%) and fluorometholone alcohol (0.1%) into human aqueous humour following topical application was determined using the very sensitive and specific technique of Gas Chromatography with Mass Spec trometry (GCMS). Prednisolone acetate afforded peak mean concentrations of 669.9 ng/ml within two hours and levels of 28.6 ng/ml in aqueous humour were detected almost 24 hours post application. The peak aqueous humour level of flu orometholone was S.lng/ml. The results are compared and contrasted with the absorption of dexamethasone alcohol (0.1%), betamethasone sodium phosphate (0.1 %) and prednisolone sodium phosphate (0.5%) into human aqueous humour. Topical corticosteroid preparations have been prednisolone acetate (1.0%) and fluorometh used widely in ophthalmology since the early alone alcohol (0.1 %) (preliminary results) 1960s and over the last 10 years the choice of into the aqueous humour of patients under preparations has become larger and more going elective cataract surgery. varied. Unfortunately, data on the intraocular penetration of these steroids in humans has SUbjects and Methods not paralleled the expansion in the number of Patients who were scheduled to undergo rou available preparations; indeed until recently, tine cataract surgery were recruited to the estimation of intraocular penetration has study and informed consent was obtained in been reliant upon extrapolation of data from all cases (n=88), Patients with corneal disease animal models (see Watson et ai., 1988, for or inflammatory ocular conditions which bibliography). -
Steroid Use in Prednisone Allergy Abby Shuck, Pharmd Candidate
Steroid Use in Prednisone Allergy Abby Shuck, PharmD candidate 2015 University of Findlay If a patient has an allergy to prednisone and methylprednisolone, what (if any) other corticosteroid can the patient use to avoid an allergic reaction? Corticosteroids very rarely cause allergic reactions in patients that receive them. Since corticosteroids are typically used to treat severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis, it seems unlikely that these drugs could actually induce an allergic reaction of their own. However, between 0.5-5% of people have reported any sort of reaction to a corticosteroid that they have received.1 Corticosteroids can cause anything from minor skin irritations to full blown anaphylactic shock. Worsening of allergic symptoms during corticosteroid treatment may not always mean that the patient has failed treatment, although it may appear to be so.2,3 There are essentially four classes of corticosteroids: Class A, hydrocortisone-type, Class B, triamcinolone acetonide type, Class C, betamethasone type, and Class D, hydrocortisone-17-butyrate and clobetasone-17-butyrate type. Major* corticosteroids in Class A include cortisone, hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, and prednisone. Major* corticosteroids in Class B include budesonide, fluocinolone, and triamcinolone. Major* corticosteroids in Class C include beclomethasone and dexamethasone. Finally, major* corticosteroids in Class D include betamethasone, fluticasone, and mometasone.4,5 Class D was later subdivided into Class D1 and D2 depending on the presence or 5,6 absence of a C16 methyl substitution and/or halogenation on C9 of the steroid B-ring. It is often hard to determine what exactly a patient is allergic to if they experience a reaction to a corticosteroid. -
CAUSES, COMPLICATIONS &TREATMENT of A“RED EYE”
CAUSES, COMPLICATIONS & TREATMENT of a “RED EYE” 8 Most cases of “red eye” seen in general practice are likely to be conjunctivitis or a superficial corneal injury, however, red eye can also indicate a serious eye condition such as acute angle glaucoma, iritis, keratitis or scleritis. Features such as significant pain, photophobia, reduced visual acuity and a unilateral presentation are “red flags” that a sight-threatening condition may be present. In the absence of specialised eye examination equipment, such as a slit lamp, General Practitioners must rely on identifying these key features to know which patients require referral to an Ophthalmologist for further assessment. Is it conjunctivitis or is it something more Iritis is also known as anterior uveitis; posterior uveitis is serious? inflammation of the choroid (choroiditis). Complications include glaucoma, cataract and macular oedema. The most likely cause of a red eye in patients who present to 4. Scleritis is inflammation of the sclera. This is a very rare general practice is conjunctivitis. However, red eye can also be presentation, usually associated with autoimmune a feature of a more serious eye condition, in which a delay in disease, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis. treatment due to a missed diagnosis can result in permanent 5. Penetrating eye injury or embedded foreign body; red visual loss. In addition, the inappropriate use of antibacterial eye is not always a feature topical eye preparations contributes to antimicrobial 6. Acid or alkali burn to the eye resistance. The patient history will usually identify a penetrating eye injury Most general practice clinics will not have access to specialised or chemical burn to the eye, but further assessment may be equipment for eye examination, e.g. -
Diagnosis and Treatment of Neurotrophic Keratopathy
An Evidence-based Approach to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neurotrophic Keratopathy ACTIVITY DIRECTOR A CME MONOGRAPH Esen K. Akpek, MD This monograph was published by Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in partnership Wilmer Eye Institute with Catalyst Medical Education, LLC. It is Johns Hopkins School of Medicine not affiliated with JAMA medical research Baltimore, Maryland publishing. Visit catalystmeded.com/NK for online testing to earn your CME credit. FACULTY Natalie Afshari, MD Mina Massaro-Giordano, MD Shiley Eye Institute University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine University of California, San Diego Philadelphia, Pennsylvania La Jolla, California Nakul Shekhawat, MD, MPH Sumayya Ahmad, MD Wilmer Eye Institute Mount Sinai School of Medicine Johns Hopkins School of Medicine New York, New York Baltimore, Maryland Pedram Hamrah, MD, FRCS, FARVO Christopher E. Starr, MD Tufts University School of Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College Boston, Massachusetts New York, New York ACTIVITY DIRECTOR FACULTY Esen K. Akpek, MD Natalie Afshari, MD Mina Massaro-Giordano, MD Professor of Ophthalmology Professor of Ophthalmology Professor of Clinical Ophthalmology Director, Ocular Surface Diseases Chief of Cornea and Refractive Surgery University of Pennsylvania School and Dry Eye Clinic Vice Chair of Education of Medicine Wilmer Eye Institute Fellowship Program Director of Cornea Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Refractive Surgery Baltimore, Maryland Shiley Eye Institute Nakul Shekhawat, MD, MPH University of California, -
Herpetic Corneal Infections
FocalPoints Clinical Modules for Ophthalmologists VOLUME XXVI, NUMBER 8 SEPTEMBER 2008 (MODULE 2 OF 3) Herpetic Corneal Infections Sonal S. Tuli, MD Reviewers and Contributing Editors Consultants George A. Stern, MD, Editor for Cornea & External Disease James Chodosh, MD, MPH Kristin M. Hammersmith, MD, Basic and Clinical Science Course Faculty, Section 8 Kirk R. Wilhelmus, MD, PhD Christie Morse, MD, Practicing Ophthalmologists Advisory Committee for Education Focal Points Editorial Review Board George A. Stern, MD, Missoula, MT Claiming CME Credit Editor in Chief, Cornea & External Disease Thomas L. Beardsley, MD, Asheville, NC Academy members: To claim Focal Points CME cred- Cataract its, visit the Academy web site and access CME Central (http://www.aao.org/education/cme) to view and print William S. Clifford, MD, Garden City, KS Glaucoma Surgery; Liaison for Practicing Ophthalmologists Advisory your Academy transcript and report CME credit you Committee for Education have earned. You can claim up to two AMA PRA Cate- gory 1 Credits™ per module. This will give you a maxi- Bradley S. Foster, MD, Springfield, MA Retina & Vitreous mum of 24 credits for the 2008 subscription year. CME credit may be claimed for up to three (3) years from Anil D. Patel, MD, Oklahoma City, OK date of issue. Non-Academy members: For assistance Neuro-Ophthalmology please send an e-mail to [email protected] or a Eric P. Purdy, MD, Fort Wayne, IN fax to (415) 561-8575. Oculoplastic, Lacrimal, & Orbital Surgery Steven I. Rosenfeld, MD, FACS, Delray Beach, FL Refractive Surgery, Optics & Refraction C. Gail Summers, MD, Minneapolis, MN Focal Points (ISSN 0891-8260) is published quarterly by the American Academy of Ophthalmology at 655 Beach St., San Francisco, CA 94109-1336. -
Pediatric Pharmacology and Pathology
7/31/2017 In the next 2 hours……. Pediatric Pharmacology and Pathology . Ocular Medications and Children The content of th is COPE Accredited CE activity was prepared independently by Valerie M. Kattouf O.D. without input from members of the optometric community . Brief review of examination techniques/modifications for children The content and format of this course is presented without commercial bias and does not claim superiority of any commercial product or service . Common Presentations of Pediatric Pathology Valerie M. Kattouf O.D., F.A.A.O. Illinois College of Optometry Chief, Pediatric Binocular Vision Service Associate Professor Ocular Medications & Children Ocular Medications & Children . Pediatric systems differ in: . The rules: – drug excretion – birth 2 years old = 1/2 dose kidney is the main site of drug excretion – 2-3 years old = 2/3 dose diminished 2° renal immaturity – > 3 years old = adult dose – biotransformation liver is organ for drug metabolism Impaired 2° enzyme immaturity . If only 50 % is absorbed may be 10x maximum dosage Punctal Occlusion for 3-4 minutes ↓ systemic absorption by 40% Ocular Medications & Children Ocular Medications & Children . Systemic absorption occurs through….. Ocular Meds with strongest potential for pediatric SE : – Mucous membrane of Nasolacrimal Duct 80% of each gtt passing through NLD system is available for rapid systemic absorption by the nasal mucosa – 10 % Phenylephrine – Conjunctiva – Oropharynx – 2 % Epinephrine – Digestive system (if swallowed) Modified by variation in Gastric pH, delayed gastric emptying & intestinal mobility – 1 % Atropine – Skin (2° overflow from conjunctival sac) Greatest in infants – 2 % Cyclopentalate Blood volume of neonate 1/20 adult Therefore absorbed meds are more concentrated at this age – 1 % Prednisone 1 7/31/2017 Ocular Medications & Children Ocular Medications & Children . -
Herpes Simplex Keratitis
Herpes Simplex Keratitis Herpes simplex eye infection is caused by a type of herpes simplex virus. An episode often clears without any permanent problem. However, in some cases the infection causes scarring to the transparent front part of the eye (the cornea). This can lead to permanent loss of vision. Prompt treatment with antiviral eye ointment or drops helps to prevent corneal scarring. Herpes simplex infections There are two types of herpes simplex virus. Type 1 is the usual cause of cold sores around the mouth, and herpes simplex infection in the eye. Type 2 is the usual cause of genital herpes. It rarely causes cold sores or eye infections. Type 1 herpes simplex infections The first time you are infected is called the primary infection. Many people become infected with this virus, often during childhood. The herpes simplex virus can pass through the moist skin that lines the mouth. It is commonly passed on by close contact such as kisses from a family member who has a cold sore. In many people the primary infection does not cause any symptoms, although in some cases symptoms do occur. Following the primary infection, the virus stays with you for life. It stays inactive (dormant) in the root of a nerve in the face (the trigeminal nerve). • In many people, the virus remains permanently inactive and causes no problems. • In some people, the virus activates and multiplies from time to time. Virus particles then travel down the nerve to cause episodes of active infection with symptoms: • In most of these cases, the virus travels down a branch of the nerve to the mouth to cause cold sores. -
Summary of Product Characteristics
Prednisolone, DK/H/2488/001-006, March 2021 SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT /…/ 2.5 mg tablets /…/ 5 mg tablets /…/ 10 mg tablets /…/ 20 mg tablets /…/ 25 mg tablets /…/ 30 mg tablets 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each tablet contains 2.5 mg prednisolone. Each tablet contains 5 mg prednisolone. Each tablet contains 10 mg prednisolone. Each tablet contains 20 mg prednisolone. Each tablet contains 25 mg prednisolone. Each tablet contains 30 mg prednisolone. Excipient with known effect: Each 2.5 mg tablet contains 89.2 mg of lactose monohydrate Each 5 mg tablet contains 87.2 mg of lactose monohydrate Each 10 mg tablet contains 81.7 mg of lactose monohydrate Each 20 mg tablet contains 163.4 mg of lactose monohydrate Each 25 mg tablet contains 159.4 mg of lactose monohydrate Each 30 mg tablet contains 153.4 mg of lactose monohydrate For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Tablets 2.5mg tablet Yellow, 7mm, round, flat, tablet, with a score line on one side, imprinted with “A610” on one side and “2.5” on the other. 5mg tablet White, 7mm, round, flat, tablet, with a score line on one side, imprinted with “A620” on one side and “5” on the other. 10mg tablet Red, 7mm, round, flat, tablet, with a score line on one side, imprinted with “A630” on one side and “10” on the other. 20mg tablet Red, 9mm, round, flat, tablet, with a score line on one side, imprinted with “A640” on one side and “20” on the other. -
Pharmacokinetics of Ophthalmic Corticosteroids
British Journal ofOphthalmology 1992; 76: 681-684 681 MINI REVIEW Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.76.11.681 on 1 November 1992. Downloaded from Pharmacokinetics of ophthalmic corticosteroids Corticosteroids have been used by ophthalmologists with an identical vehicle, the aqueous humour concentrations of increasing frequency over the past 30 years, with the these steroids are almost identical.'9 None the less it is concomitant development of a diverse range of drop, essential when considering such empirical data, to recall that ointment, subconjunctival, and oral preparations. Though the systemic anti-inflammatory effect of both betamethasone the clinical benefits and side effects of such corticosteroid and dexamethasone is five to seven times that of predniso- preparations have been well documented, their basic lone.39"' The local anti-inflammatory potency of ocular pharmacokinetics in the human eye have yet to be fully steroids has yet to be fully investigated and whilst early work established. Indeed most of our pharmacokinetic knowledge suggested that prednisolone acetate 1% had the greatest anti- of these drugs has been elucidated by extrapolation of data inflammatory effect in experimental keratitis,'7 later studies obtained from rabbit experiments.1-26 These results can be demonstrated that fluorometholone acetate in a 1% formu- significantly disparate from human data because of the lation was equally efficacious in the same model.26 However, thinner rabbit cornea, lower rabbit blink rate, effect of prednisolone