Decadron® (Dexamethasone Tablets, Usp)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The National Drugs List
^ ^ ^ ^ ^[ ^ The National Drugs List Of Syrian Arab Republic Sexth Edition 2006 ! " # "$ % &'() " # * +$, -. / & 0 /+12 3 4" 5 "$ . "$ 67"5,) 0 " /! !2 4? @ % 88 9 3: " # "$ ;+<=2 – G# H H2 I) – 6( – 65 : A B C "5 : , D )* . J!* HK"3 H"$ T ) 4 B K<) +$ LMA N O 3 4P<B &Q / RS ) H< C4VH /430 / 1988 V W* < C A GQ ") 4V / 1000 / C4VH /820 / 2001 V XX K<# C ,V /500 / 1992 V "!X V /946 / 2004 V Z < C V /914 / 2003 V ) < ] +$, [2 / ,) @# @ S%Q2 J"= [ &<\ @ +$ LMA 1 O \ . S X '( ^ & M_ `AB @ &' 3 4" + @ V= 4 )\ " : N " # "$ 6 ) G" 3Q + a C G /<"B d3: C K7 e , fM 4 Q b"$ " < $\ c"7: 5) G . HHH3Q J # Hg ' V"h 6< G* H5 !" # $%" & $' ,* ( )* + 2 ا اوا ادو +% 5 j 2 i1 6 B J' 6<X " 6"[ i2 "$ "< * i3 10 6 i4 11 6! ^ i5 13 6<X "!# * i6 15 7 G!, 6 - k 24"$d dl ?K V *4V h 63[46 ' i8 19 Adl 20 "( 2 i9 20 G Q) 6 i10 20 a 6 m[, 6 i11 21 ?K V $n i12 21 "% * i13 23 b+ 6 i14 23 oe C * i15 24 !, 2 6\ i16 25 C V pq * i17 26 ( S 6) 1, ++ &"r i19 3 +% 27 G 6 ""% i19 28 ^ Ks 2 i20 31 % Ks 2 i21 32 s * i22 35 " " * i23 37 "$ * i24 38 6" i25 39 V t h Gu* v!* 2 i26 39 ( 2 i27 40 B w< Ks 2 i28 40 d C &"r i29 42 "' 6 i30 42 " * i31 42 ":< * i32 5 ./ 0" -33 4 : ANAESTHETICS $ 1 2 -1 :GENERAL ANAESTHETICS AND OXYGEN 4 $1 2 2- ATRACURIUM BESYLATE DROPERIDOL ETHER FENTANYL HALOTHANE ISOFLURANE KETAMINE HCL NITROUS OXIDE OXYGEN PROPOFOL REMIFENTANIL SEVOFLURANE SUFENTANIL THIOPENTAL :LOCAL ANAESTHETICS !67$1 2 -5 AMYLEINE HCL=AMYLOCAINE ARTICAINE BENZOCAINE BUPIVACAINE CINCHOCAINE LIDOCAINE MEPIVACAINE OXETHAZAINE PRAMOXINE PRILOCAINE PREOPERATIVE MEDICATION & SEDATION FOR 9*: ;< " 2 -8 : : SHORT -TERM PROCEDURES ATROPINE DIAZEPAM INJ. -
Prednisolone Versus Dexamethasone for Croup: a Randomized Controlled Trial Colin M
Prednisolone Versus Dexamethasone for Croup: a Randomized Controlled Trial Colin M. Parker, MBChB, DCH, MRCPCH, FACEM,a,b Matthew N. Cooper, BCA, BSc, PhDc OBJECTIVES: The use of either prednisolone or low-dose dexamethasone in the treatment of abstract childhood croup lacks a rigorous evidence base despite widespread use. In this study, we compare dexamethasone at 0.6 mg/kg with both low-dose dexamethasone at 0.15 mg/kg and prednisolone at 1 mg/kg. METHODS: Prospective, double-blind, noninferiority randomized controlled trial based in 1 tertiary pediatric emergency department and 1 urban district emergency department in Perth, Western Australia. Inclusions were age .6 months, maximum weight 20 kg, contactable by telephone, and English-speaking caregivers. Exclusion criteria were known prednisolone or dexamethasone allergy, immunosuppressive disease or treatment, steroid therapy or enrollment in the study within the previous 14 days, and a high clinical suspicion of an alternative diagnosis. A total of 1252 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg; n = 410), low-dose dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg; n = 410), or prednisolone (1 mg/kg; n = 411). Primary outcome measures included Westley Croup Score 1-hour after treatment and unscheduled medical re-attendance during the 7 days after treatment. RESULTS: Mean Westley Croup Score at baseline was 1.4 for dexamethasone, 1.5 for low-dose dexamethasone, and 1.5 for prednisolone. Adjusted difference in scores at 1 hour, compared with dexamethasone, was 0.03 (95% confidence interval 20.09 to 0.15) for low-dose dexamethasone and 0.05 (95% confidence interval 20.07 to 0.17) for prednisolone. -
Mifepristone
1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Mifegyne 200 mg tablets 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each tablet contains 200-mg mifepristone. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Tablet. Light yellow, cylindrical, bi-convex tablets, with a diameter of 11 mm with “167 B” engraved on one side. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS For termination of pregnancy, the anti-progesterone mifepristone and the prostaglandin analogue can only be prescribed and administered in accordance with New Zealand’s abortion laws and regulations. 4.1 Therapeutic indications 1- Medical termination of developing intra-uterine pregnancy. In sequential use with a prostaglandin analogue, up to 63 days of amenorrhea (see section 4.2). 2- Softening and dilatation of the cervix uteri prior to surgical termination of pregnancy during the first trimester. 3- Preparation for the action of prostaglandin analogues in the termination of pregnancy for medical reasons (beyond the first trimester). 4- Labour induction in fetal death in utero. In patients where prostaglandin or oxytocin cannot be used. 4.2 Dose and Method of Administration Dose 1- Medical termination of developing intra-uterine pregnancy The method of administration will be as follows: • Up to 49 days of amenorrhea: 1 Mifepristone is taken as a single 600 mg (i.e. 3 tablets of 200 mg each) oral dose, followed 36 to 48 hours later, by the administration of the prostaglandin analogue: misoprostol 400 µg orally or per vaginum. • Between 50-63 days of amenorrhea Mifepristone is taken as a single 600 mg (i.e. 3 tablets of 200 mg each) oral dose, followed 36 to 48 hours later, by the administration of misoprostol. -
Opposing Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone And
European Journal of Endocrinology (2000) 143 687±695 ISSN 0804-4643 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY Opposing effects of dehydroepiandrosterone and dexamethasone on the generation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells M O Canning, K Grotenhuis, H J de Wit and H A Drexhage Department of Immunology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands (Correspondence should be addressed to H A Drexhage, Lab Ee 838, Department of Immunology, Erasmus University, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Background: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) has been suggested as an immunostimulating steroid hormone, of which the effects on the development of dendritic cells (DC) are unknown. The effects of DHEA often oppose those of the other adrenal glucocorticoid, cortisol. Glucocorticoids (GC) are known to suppress the immune response at different levels and have recently been shown to modulate the development of DC, thereby influencing the initiation of the immune response. Variations in the duration of exposure to, and doses of, GC (particularly dexamethasone (DEX)) however, have resulted in conflicting effects on DC development. Aim: In this study, we describe the effects of a continuous high level of exposure to the adrenal steroid DHEA (1026 M) on the generation of immature DC from monocytes, as well as the effects of the opposing steroid DEX on this development. Results: The continuous presence of DHEA (1026 M) in GM-CSF/IL-4-induced monocyte-derived DC cultures resulted in immature DC with a morphology and functional capabilities similar to those of typical immature DC (T cell stimulation, IL-12/IL-10 production), but with a slightly altered phenotype of increased CD80 and decreased CD43 expression (markers of maturity). -
A New Robust Technique for Testing of Glucocorticosteroids in Dogs and Horses Terry E
Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2007 A new robust technique for testing of glucocorticosteroids in dogs and horses Terry E. Webster Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Veterinary Toxicology and Pharmacology Commons Recommended Citation Webster, Terry E., "A new robust technique for testing of glucocorticosteroids in dogs and horses" (2007). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 15029. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15029 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A new robust technique for testing of glucocorticosteroids in dogs and horses by Terry E. Webster A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Toxicology Program o f Study Committee: Walter G. Hyde, Major Professor Steve Ensley Thomas Isenhart Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2007 Copyright © Terry Edward Webster, 2007. All rights reserved UMI Number: 1446027 Copyright 2007 by Webster, Terry E. All rights reserved. UMI Microform 1446027 Copyright 2007 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 ii DEDICATION I want to dedicate this project to my wife, Jackie, and my children, Shauna, Luke and Jake for their patience and understanding without which this project would not have been possible. -
Mitigations in Selected Haemostatic Parameters in Administration of Graded Doses of Dexamethasone and Its Blockers in Wister
ogy iol : Cu ys r h re P n t & R Anatomy & Physiology: Current y e s m e o a t Nwangwa et al., Anat Physiol 2018, 8:2 r a c n h A Research DOI: 10.4172/2161-0940.1000297 ISSN: 2161-0940 Research Article Open Access Mitigations in Selected Haemostatic Parameters in Administration of Graded Doses of Dexamethasone and its Blockers in Wister Rats Nwangwa EK and Odigie OM* Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria *Corresponding author: Odigie OM, Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria, E-mail: [email protected] Received date: May 07, 2018; Accepted date: May 25, 2018; Published date: May 29, 2018 Copyright: © 2018 Nwangwa EK, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Clinical trials have shown that an even newer compound, dexamethasone (Dex), might be more potent and less likely to cause side-effects than any other known corticosteroid medication. This study investigated the possible changes in selected haemostatic parameters [clotting time, bleeding time, platelets count and fibrinogen level] in albino wistar rats, following administration of graded doses of Dex. Forty-two male albino Wistar rats were randomly grouped into seven of six rats each. With Group A receiving normal diets (Control), Groups B-G were respectively given 0.1 mg/Kg of Dex, 0.3 mg/Kg of Dex, 0.1 mg/Kg of Dex +33 mg/Kg of Ketokonazol (Keto), 0.3 mg/Kg of Dex +33 mg/Kg of Keto, 0.1 mg/Kg of Dex+Vitamin (Vit) E and 0.1 mg/Kg of Dex. -
The Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate on Counterregulatory Responses During Repeated Hypoglycemia in Conscious Normal Rats Darleen A
The Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate on Counterregulatory Responses During Repeated Hypoglycemia in Conscious Normal Rats Darleen A. Sandoval, Ling Ping, Ray Anthony Neill, Sachiko Morrey, and Stephen N. Davis ⅐ ؊1 ⅐ ؊1 We previously determined that both antecedent hy- mol/l kg min ; P < 0.05). In summary, day-1 poglycemia and elevated cortisol levels blunt neu- antecedent hypoglycemia blunted neuroendocrine and roendocrine and metabolic responses to subsequent metabolic responses to next-day hypoglycemia. How- hypoglycemia in conscious, unrestrained rats. The adre- ever, simultaneous DHEA-S infusion during antecedent nal steroid dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) hypoglycemia preserved neuroendocrine and metabolic has been shown in several studies to oppose corticoste- counterregulatory responses during subsequent hypo- roid action. The purpose of this study was to determine glycemia in conscious rats. Diabetes 53:679–686, 2004 if DHEA-S could preserve counterregulatory responses during repeated hypoglycemia. We studied 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats during a series of 2-day protocols. he Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Day 1 consisted of two 2-h episodes of 1) hyperinsuline- mic (30 pmol ⅐ kg؊1 ⅐ min؊1) euglycemia (6.2 ؎ 0.2 established that intensive glucose control in type ANTE EUG), 2) hyperinsulinemic eug- 1 diabetic patients can slow the progression or ;12 ؍ mmol/l; n -plus simultaneous Tsignificantly reduce the onset of diabetic micro (8 ؍ lycemia (6.0 ؎ 0.1 mmol/l; n intravenous infusion of DHEA-S (30 mg/kg; ANTE EUG vascular complications (e.g., retinopathy, nephropathy, ؉ DHEA-S), 3) hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (2.8 ؎ neuropathy) (1). Unfortunately, the study also established ANTE HYPO), or 4) hyperinsulinemic that intensive glucose treatment causes an approximate ;12 ؍ mmol/l; n 0.1 -with simulta- threefold increase in the frequency of severe hypoglyce (8 ؍ hypoglycemia (2.8 ؎ 0.1 mmol/l; n neous intravenous infusion of DHEA-S (30 mg/kg; ANTE mia (2). -
Contact Dermatitis to Medications and Skin Products
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology (2019) 56:41–59 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-018-8705-0 Contact Dermatitis to Medications and Skin Products Henry L. Nguyen1 & James A. Yiannias2 Published online: 25 August 2018 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Consumer products and topical medications today contain many allergens that can cause a reaction on the skin known as allergic contact dermatitis. This review looks at various allergens in these products and reports current allergic contact dermatitis incidence and trends in North America, Europe, and Asia. First, medication contact allergy to corticosteroids will be discussed along with its five structural classes (A, B, C, D1, D2) and their steroid test compounds (tixocortol-21-pivalate, triamcinolone acetonide, budesonide, clobetasol-17-propionate, hydrocortisone-17-butyrate). Cross-reactivities between the steroid classes will also be examined. Next, estrogen and testosterone transdermal therapeutic systems, local anesthetic (benzocaine, lidocaine, pramoxine, dyclonine) antihistamines (piperazine, ethanolamine, propylamine, phenothiazine, piperidine, and pyrrolidine), top- ical antibiotics (neomycin, spectinomycin, bacitracin, mupirocin), and sunscreen are evaluated for their potential to cause contact dermatitis and cross-reactivities. Finally, we examine the ingredients in the excipients of these products, such as the formaldehyde releasers (quaternium-15, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3 diol, diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin), the non- formaldehyde releasers (isothiazolinones, parabens, methyldibromo glutaronitrile, iodopropynyl butylcarbamate, and thimero- sal), fragrance mixes, and Myroxylon pereirae (Balsam of Peru) for contact allergy incidence and prevalence. Furthermore, strategies, recommendations, and two online tools (SkinSAFE and the Contact Allergen Management Program) on how to avoid these allergens in commercial skin care products will be discussed at the end. -
And Function by Progesterone TLR4-Mediated Dendritic Cell
Differential Modulation of TLR3- and TLR4-Mediated Dendritic Cell Maturation and Function by Progesterone This information is current as Leigh A. Jones, Shrook Kreem, Muhannad Shweash, of September 23, 2021. Andrew Paul, James Alexander and Craig W. Roberts J Immunol 2010; 185:4525-4534; Prepublished online 15 September 2010; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901155 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/185/8/4525 Downloaded from Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2010/09/13/jimmunol.090115 Material 5.DC1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ References This article cites 56 articles, 12 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/185/8/4525.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision by guest on September 23, 2021 • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2010 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Differential Modulation of TLR3- and TLR4-Mediated Dendritic Cell Maturation and Function by Progesterone Leigh A. -
Pharmaceuticals As Environmental Contaminants
PharmaceuticalsPharmaceuticals asas EnvironmentalEnvironmental Contaminants:Contaminants: anan OverviewOverview ofof thethe ScienceScience Christian G. Daughton, Ph.D. Chief, Environmental Chemistry Branch Environmental Sciences Division National Exposure Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development Environmental Protection Agency Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 [email protected] Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Why and how do drugs contaminate the environment? What might it all mean? How do we prevent it? Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada This talk presents only a cursory overview of some of the many science issues surrounding the topic of pharmaceuticals as environmental contaminants Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada A Clarification We sometimes loosely (but incorrectly) refer to drugs, medicines, medications, or pharmaceuticals as being the substances that contaminant the environment. The actual environmental contaminants, however, are the active pharmaceutical ingredients – APIs. These terms are all often used interchangeably Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Office of Research and Development Available: http://www.epa.gov/nerlesd1/chemistry/pharma/image/drawing.pdfNational -
Dexamethasone: an All Purpose Agent? 65
Dexamethasone: An All Purpose Agent? 65 Dexamethasone: An All Purpose Agent? KARA ALLEN MBBS (Hons), BMedSci (Hons) ATY2, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne Dr Kara Allen is an ATY2 at St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne. Her interests include regional anaesthesia and ultrasound and she is currently undertaking a pilot study into perioperative dexamethasone use. SUMMARY Dexamethasone is a synthetic glucocorticosteroid which has minimal mineralocorticoid activity. It is a potent anti-inflammatory drug with 25-50 times the potency of hydrocortisone and is up to sixteen times as potent as prednisolone. Dexamethasone is utilised frequently in the perioperative setting, including prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting, reduction of airway and cerebral oedema, and it may be useful in the management of acute and chronic pain. This review is intended to outline some of the perioperative uses of dexamethasone and elucidate areas where further research is needed. PHARMACOLOGY Like all glucocorticoids, dexamethasone acts on the glucocorticoid receptor which is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, subfamily 3C. Multiple signalling pathways are involved following binding of the steroid to the receptor, including direct DNA binding which results in changes to gene transcription. This results in changes to carbohydrate, protein and fat metabolism as well as changes to gluconeogenesis. Of interest in the perioperative setting is the decreased release of bradykinin, tumour necrosis factor, interleukin-1, interleukin-2 and interleukin-6 and decreased production of prostaglandins 1. There is decreased transmission of impulses in C fibres. Binding of steroid ligands to the glucocorticoid receptor also alters the half life of mRNA which have already been produced within the cell 2. -
Improved Penetrating Topical Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing Corticosteroids
Europaisches Patentamt ® European Patent Office © Publication number: 0 129 283 Office europeen des brevets A2 © EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION © Application number: 84200821.1 ©Int CI.3: A 61 K 31/57 A 61 K 47/00, A 61 K 9/06 © Date of filing: 12.06.84 © Priority: 21.06.83 US 506274 © Applicant: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 01.02.84 US 576065 301 East Sixth Street Cincinnati Ohio 45201 (US) © Date of publication of application: © Inventor: Cooper, Eugene Rex 27.12.84 Bulletin 84/52 2425 Ambassador Drive Cincinnati, OH 45231 (US) © Designated Contracting States: BE CH DE FR GB IT Li NL SE © Inventor: Loomans, Maurice Edward 5231 Jessup Road Cincinnati, OH 45239IUS) © Inventor: Fawzi, Mahdi Bakir 11 Timberline Drive Flanders New Jersey 07836(US) © Representative: Suslic, Lydia et al, Procter & Gamble European Technical Center Temselaan 100 B-1820 Strombeek-Bever(BE) © Improved penetrating topical pharmaceutical compositions containing corticosteroids. Topical pharmaceutical compositions containing a cor- ticosteroid component and a penetration-enhancing vehicle are disclosed. The vehicle comprises a binary combination of a C3-C4 diol and a "cell-envelope disordering compound". The vehicle provides marked transepidermal and percutaneous delivery of corticosteroids. A method of treating certain rheumatic and inflammatory conditions, systemically or loc- ally, is also disclosed. TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to topical compositions effective in delivering high levels of certain pharmaceutically-active cor- ticosteroid agents through the integument. Because of the ease of access, dynamics of application, large surface area, vast exposure to the circulatory and lymphatic networks, and non-invasive nature of the treatment, the delivery of pharmaceutically-active agents through the skin has long been a promising concept.