DOCSLIB.ORG

AIRWAR: C21 (2Nd Pdf Edition) Contemporary Air Combat Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AIRWAR: C21 (2Nd Pdf Edition) Contemporary Air Combat Rules 1 142.161.23.105 AIRWAR: C21 (2nd pdf edition) contemporary air combat rules Contents Introduction 3 Rockets 11 SAM missile locks 21 Notation 3 Gun/rocket attack Resolving SAM attacks 21 Materials to play 3 modifiers 11 Anti-aircraft guns 21 Bomber tail guns 11 Resolving AA gun Aircraft 3 Air-to-air missiles 11 attacks 22 Aircraft characteristics 3 Launching an AAM 11 Electronic warfare Arc definitions 4 Missile aspect 12 aircraft 22 Countermeasure decoys 5 Missile locks 12 ECM 5 Scores to hit 12 Aircraft load points 22 Air-to-air rockets 5 AAM ranges and “Lightly loaded” 5 modifiers 12 Spotting 23 “Heavily loaded” 5 Countermeasure Spotting requirements & Jettisoning weapons 6 decoys 13 procedure 23 Nuclear AAMs 13 Radar spotting 23 Pilots 6 Aircraft damage 13 Visual spotting 23 Crippled aircraft 13 Spotting restrictions on Advantages and flaws 6 Additional damage 14 manoeuvring 23 Golden BB table 14 Spotting restrictions on firing 23 Order of play 6 Ejection 15 Crashing 15 Ground scale 24 Initiative and order of movement 7 Ground objects 15 Models 24 “Tailing” 7 Ground attack 16 SOTCW 24 Movement 7 Air-to-ground weapons 17 “Engine power” speed Guns and gun pods 17 Designer’s notes 25 7 Initiating a ground attack 18 changes Executing the attack 18 Aircraft ratings 26 Normal movement & 7 Resolving air-to-ground AAM ratings 34 turning 8 attacks (strafing) 18 Gun pod ratings 36 Low altitude moves 9 Resolving other air-to- Air-to-ground weapon Special manoeuvres 10 ground attacks 18 ratings 36 Stalling Ground radars & ARMs 19 Land based SAM ratings 38 Exceeding maximum 10 Collateral damage 20 AA gun ratings 42 speed 10 Target suppression 20 Quick reference sheets 44 Air-to-air combat Surface-to-air fire 20 Guns, gun pods & rockets 10 Surface-to-air missiles 20 Guns & gun pod attacks 10 Launching SAMs 21 Credits Written by: David Manley, Paul Playtesters: Gavin Akers, Kevin AIRWAR: C21, all rules, text, graphic and photos are © Wessex Games 2008. Minson and Larry Freeman. Carrucan, Rolf Grein, Rob Kent, All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be Russell Kent, Thomas Minson, produced in any form or by any means without the prior First edition written by: David Charles Rivers, Kevin Slimak, permission of the publisher. Manley and Matthew Hartley. This publication is sold subject to the following Ward Yarborough and Radek conditions: Photos: Steve Blease Zeleny. 1. It shall not be by way of trade or otherwise be lent, resold or hired out or in otherwise circulated without the publishers prior permission in any form of binding Models: Furuta Miniature War Special thanks to: Members of or cover other than that in which it was published and Planes collection the WGHistorical Yahoo Group, without a similar condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. Matthew Hartley, Liz, Karen, 2. No part of this publication may be reproduced, These rules are respectfully Laura, Phil and Saul. stored in any retrieval system or transmitted in any dedicated to all the air crews who form or by any means electronic, mechanical, Printed by: Topflite Print photocopying, recording scanning or otherwise without have died in the defence of peace Management Ltd, Farrington prior permission of the publishers. and freedom since 1945. Published 2008 by Wessex Games Fields, Farrington Guerney, Remember – illegal copying is theft and every penny Bristol, BS39 6UU you steal from us by doing it, impacts another project we are working on for wargamers. 2 142.161.23.105 AIRWAR: C21 (2nd pdf edition) Introduction represents (you want to avoid a kilometre-wide infantry platoon, for instance). AirWar: C21 is a fast play, “entry level” set of rules for dogfights set in the years after WW2, and for Missile markers: these can be as simple as a near future SF games. The rules use a quasi 3D counter with an arrow on it or as fancy as a manoeuvre system, whereby the action is fought miniature model missile. You just need a way to out in 2D, but with some representation of 3D air indicate that an aircraft has a hostile missile combat manoeuvres. Game length is typically 6-12 heading for it. Ideally they should have some turns. Playing time varies by game size, scenario, directionality, so you can use the orientation as a and player experience. Generally it can range from memory aid for whether the missile has a lock or 30 minutes for a small, short scenario with four not (see the air-to-air missile rules for details). aircraft to 3-4 hours for a large, convention-style game with 6-12 flights of aircraft on the table. Radar Off markers: if using ground air defences in Typical game length with experienced players, eight the scenario that use radar, you’ll need to mark aircraft, and 6-8 turns, is an hour to an hour-and-a- stands that have shut down their radars (usually to half. avoid an incoming anti-radar missile) Notation Suppression markers: use these to mark ground targets (usually anti-aircraft gun or missile stands) The game uses standard notation for dice and die that have been hit and suppressed by an air attack. rolling. For example, “roll 2d10” means roll two ten- Cotton balls or yellow markers are suggested. sided dice. Materials needed to play Aircraft Materials needed for playing are: Aircraft are the primary units in the game. Each miniature or stand represents a single aircraft. Aircraft: ideally these are miniature aircraft, but Aircraft are usually grouped together into sections cardboard counters or markers can be used. The or flights of two to four aircraft. New players should rules work best with 1/285th, 1/300th, or 1/600th generally control one or two aircraft. Experienced scale aircraft, but other scales can be used. The players can control without difficulty a flight of four aircraft can be mounted on flight stands or placed aircraft, or two sections of two or three aircraft directly on the tabletop. Whatever is used, you apiece. need to define the point where angles, arcs, and ranges will be measured from. This can be the Aircraft characteristics and ratings centre of the stand, the nose of the aircraft, or some other point; just be consistent. For un-mounted Aircraft have a number of factors to describe them.: aircraft 1/144th scale or larger, measuring from the tip of the nose seems to work best. Mn: minimum speed in inches. The minimum speed the aircraft can travel (if its speed drops below this Aircraft/pilot rosters: these list the ratings of the it stalls and may crash). aircraft and pilots in the game and provide locations to mark off weapons and ammo as they are used, Mx: maximum speed in inches. The distance as well as to record the aircraft’s speed changes moved in each of the 2 phases in a turn (2” per 100 and damage taken. knots of speed). Aircraft suffer damage if they exceed this maximum speed. Dice: each player will need at least one 10-sided die (d10) and a six-sided die (d6). It is Pw: the raw power generated by the aircraft’s recommended to have two d10 and three or more engines, affecting the ability to perform some d6. Where the rules call for a d4 to be rolled, a d6 manoeuvres. can be used; just re-roll any ‘5’s or ‘6’s until you get results in the range ‘1’ to ‘4’. Acc1: the amount of acceleration the engine can produce in phase 1 of a turn. This is the maximum Ground units/ground targets: if you plan to play amount the aircraft’s speed can be increased at the ground attack scenarios, you’ll need something on start of the phase, in inches. the ground to shoot at, and possibly something on the ground to shoot back at you. Ideally these Acc2: the amount of acceleration the engine can would be miniatures again, at the same scale or produce in phase 2 of a turn. This is the maximum smaller scale than the aircraft, but they can be amount the aircraft’s speed can be increased at the counters. Mounting is not important, just pay start of the phase, in inches. attention to the game’s ground scale and what each miniature, stand of miniatures, or counter 3 142.161.23.105 AIRWAR: C21 (2nd pdf edition) Year: the approximate year the aircraft became available. Missile Load: typical missile load carried by the aircraft. Notes: specific details about the aircraft, such as the presence of tail guns or special or unusual capabilities. Arc definitions Dec: the maximum amount the aircraft can reduce The game uses several different arcs around an speed in either phase of a turn, in inches, by cutting aircraft for resolving eligibility to tail an enemy the throttle, opening airbrakes, etc. aircraft or to fire on it, and for effects on weapon hit chances. Ma: the aircraft’s manoeuvre rating, a measure of its ability to turn and perform manoeuvres. Can be Arc Definition Low, Medium, High and Extreme. rear-60 a 60-degree arc centred on the rear of the aircraft Gn: the base number of dice the aircraft gets when rear-180 a 180-degree arc centred on the rear making a gun attack with its internal guns. of the aircraft beam the portion of the rear-180 arc not Am: the number of units of gun ammo carried by included in rear-60 arc (in other the aircraft for its internal guns. Each unit words, the two 60-degree arcs on represents one second of fire.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tome 2 · ANNEXES to the STUDY REPORT
    Tome 2 · ANNEXES to the STUDY REPORT Annex A: International Team activities during the Study Annex B: Questions to and Answers from UK Authorities Ba Questions to and Answers from : UK CAA Bb, Questions to and Answers from DERA Bc, & Bd Bc Questions to and Answers from the Army Historical branch & Bd Questions to and Answers from the Royal Navy Historical Branch Be,& Bf Be Questions to and Answers from The Royal Air Force Bf Questions to and Answers from the Public Record Office Annex A: International Team activities during the Study Report Annex A « INTERNATIONAL TEAM ACTIVITIES » From July 17, 2000 To November 27, 2001 1. Mission in Dublin on 17-18 July 2000 Mr. Colin Torkington, Admiral Yves Lemercier and Mr. Manuel Pech were convened at Dublin by the head of the AAIU, Mr. Kevin B. Humphreys, in view of:- Being informed on the Tuskar Rock accident, the accident report of the 1968 Investigation Commission, the follow-on of this inconclusive report, the 2000 review and the common will of the Irish and English parties to get out of all the “conspiracy” theories produced since the seventies; Being asked if they accepted to work as an “International Team”, on a task to be given by the Assistant Secretary General-Aviation, of the Department of Public Enterprise; Contributing to the definition of the task. The three experts were informed during a session held in the AAIU on 17th afternoon; they accepted to work as a team; Mr. Torkington was leading the team‟s activities with respect to technical matters; Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Air-To-Air Missiles
    AAMs Link Page AIR-TO-AIR MISSILES British AAMs Chinese AAMs French AAMs Israeli AAMs Italian AAMs Russian AAMs South African AAMs US AAMs file:///E/My%20Webs/aams/aams_2.htm[5/24/2021 5:42:58 PM] British Air-to-Air Missiles Firestreak Notes: Firestreak was an early British heat-seeking missile, roughly analogous to the Sidewinder (though much larger). The testing program started in 1954, and the missile was so successful that for the first 100 launches, the engineers learned practically nothing about any potential weaknesses of the Firestreak. (Later testing revealed an accuracy rating of about 85% when fired within the proper parameters, still a remarkable total.) The Firestreak had been largely replaced by later missiles by 2003, though the few countries still using the Lightning (mostly Saudi Arabia and Kuwait) still had some Firestreaks on hand. Weapon Weight Accuracy Guidance Sensing Price Firestreak 137 kg Average IR Rear Aspect $7400 Weapon Speed Min Rng Max Rng Damage Pen Type Firestreak 5095 1065 8000 C47 B100 26C FRAG-HE Red Top Notes: The Red Top began as an upgrade to the Firestreak (and was originally called the Firestreak Mk IV). The Red Top was to overcome the narrow angle of acquisition of the Firestreak, as well as to rarrange the components of the Firestreak in a more logical and efficient pattern. Increases in technology allowed a better seeker head and the change in design as well as explosives technology allowed a more lethal warhead. However, by 2003, the Red Top has the same status as the Firestreak; largely in storage except for those countries still using the Lightning.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocket and Bomb Testing
    WOOMERA.DOC Lecture to the .Hornsby Radio Club ROCKET AND BOMB TESTING Tonight I am going to talk about the Woomera rocket range, in South Australia, as it existed in the late 1950s and early 60s, and show a few slides of that period. And, all things being equal, I shall conclude with my experiences in testing the fusing system of an atomic bomb. Now to business. During World War II German military science reached for the stars and nearly grasped them. It achieved what the allies believed to be impossible - a long-range rocket which pushed 1 ton of high explosive 90 kilometres up to land 320 kilometres or so away. It was 1500 mm in diameter and weighed just on 13 tonnes. The flight took 5 minutes from firing to impact and against such a weapon there was no defence. This was the V2 rocket or the second Vengeance Weapon. (The first, the V1, was the flying bomb or Doodlebug as it was nicknamed..) Now, although Hitler had plans to build 30,000 V2s only 3,000 got to be fired against London, Antwerp and Brussels before the launch sites were overrun by the Allied armies. All the same, it was a close-run thing. But there is a counterpoint to this tale. The Allies achieved what the Germans did not believe was necessary the atomic bomb. In 1941 Germany had considered all the implications of building an atomic bomb and concluded that, on balance, the war could be waged and won with existing technology. The received wisdom in Germany was that there was no point in proceeding with something which would tax their technical resources to the utmost and which might not work in the long run.
    [Show full text]
  • A/C Serial No.G -Apas Section 2B
    A/C SERIAL NO.G -APAS SECTION 2B INDIVIDUAL HISTORY DE HAVILLAND COMET 1XB F-BGNZ/XM823/ G -APAS/8351M MUSEUM ACCESSION NUMBER 84/A/1186 Built at Hatfield, Herts. The last of 21 Comet 1 aircraft to be completed. Constructors number 06022. 16 Mar 53 First flight following completion at Hatfield. 22 Jul 53 Delivered to Air France as F - BGNZ as the third of three Ghost 50 Mk 2 powered improved Comet 1As ordered by that operator 16 Nov 51. Total flying hours 13.35. These export Comets had increased all-up weight with 44 seats and greater fuel capacity compared to the BOAC series 1 aircraft, and an increased cruising altitude of 40,000ft. The Air France aircraft carried a livery of white fuselage upper surfaces, natural metal lower fuselage side and wings, with titling, registration, and fuselage cheat line in blue. 28 Jul 53 Certificate of Airworthiness issued. 8 Sep 53 Entered service with Air France on its first regular service with a jet airliner. Operated on the weekly Paris (Le Bourget) - Rome - Beirut service which had started on Wednesday 26 August 1953 (Beirut at that time being a sophisticated holiday destination) using Comet F-BGNY, with the return run being made on Thursdays. Routes from Le Bourget to Cairo, Algiers (a route of 832 miles) and Casablanca commenced the following month. The return flights from Casablanca were timetabled at 4 hrs 20 minutes, from Algiers 3.5 hours, and from Cairo 6 ¾ hours including a one-hour stop at Rome. Air France also intended to use its Comets on services to the Far East.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough 100 Years of Innovative Research, Development and Application
    Journal of Aeronautical History Paper 2020/04 The Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough 100 years of Innovative Research, Development and Application Dr Graham Rood Farnborough Air Sciences Trust (FAST) Formerly Head of Man Machine Integration (MMI) Dept. RAE Farnborough ABSTRACT Aviation research and development has been carried out in Great Britain for well over a century. Starting with balloons in the army at Woolwich Arsenal in 1878, progressing through kites and dirigibles in 1907, through to the first practical aeroplanes, the B.E.1 and B.E.2, designed and built by the Royal Aircraft Factory in April 1911. At this time Mervyn O’Gorman was installed as the Superintendent of the Army Aircraft Factory and began to gather the best scientists and engineers and bring scientific methods to the design and testing of aeroplanes. Renamed the Royal Aircraft Factory (RAF) in April 1912, it designed, built and tested aircraft, engines and aircraft systems throughout WW1. In 1918 its title was changed to the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE) to avoid confusion with the newly formed Royal Air Force. From then on RAE Farnborough and its outstations, including Bedford and Pyestock, developed into the biggest aviation research and development establishment in Europe and one of the best known names in aviation, working in all the disciplines necessary to build and test aircraft in their entirety. On the 1st April 1991 the RAE ceased to exist. The Establishment was renamed the Aerospace Division of the Defence Research Agency (DRA) and remained an executive agency of the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD). It was the start of changing its emphasis from research to gain and extend knowledge to more commercially focussed concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Bo Ser Guid Mbs Ded Gc Genera
    LASER GUIDED GBU-53/B AIR TO GROUND GBU-54/B BOMBS GBU-55/B MISSILES GBU-1/B GBU-56/B AGM-28 GBU-2/B GBU-57/B AGM-65 I/R GBU-3/B AGM-65 E/O GBU-5/B AGM-69 GBU-6/B GENERAL PURPOSE - AGM-84 Harpoon GBU-7/B CLUSTER BOMBS AGM-86 ALCM GBU-8/B CBU-55B AGM-88 HARM GBU-9/B CBU-58B AGM-114 Hellfire GBU-10/B CBU-59B AGM-122 Sidearm GBU-11/B CBU-60A AGM-129 ACM GBU-12/B CBU-63B AGM-130 GBU-15/B CBU-70B AGM-142 Raptor GBU-16/B CBU-71B AGM-154 JSOW GBU-17/B CBU-72B AGM-158 JASSM GBU-20/B CBU-75A/B BGM-71 TOW GBU-21/B CBU-76B GBU-22/B CBU-77B AIR TO AIR MISSILES GBU-23/B CBU-78B AIM-4 Falcon GBU-24/B CBU-81A AIM-7 Sparrow GBU-27/B CBU-87/B AIM-9L Sidewinder GBU-28/B CBU-89A/B AIM-9M Sidewinder GBU-29/B CBU-97/B AIM-9X Sidewinder GBU-30/B CBU-98 AIM-47 Falcon GBU-31/B CBU-103/B AIM-54 Phoenix GBU-32/B CBU-103A/B AIM-120A/B AMRAAM GBU-33/B CBU-103B/B AIM-120C AMRAAM GBU-34/B CBU-104/B AIM-132 ASRAAM GBU-35/B CBU-104A/B GBU-36/B CBU-105/B GBU-37/B CBU-105A/B GBU-38/B CBU-105B/B GBU-39/B CBU-105C/B GBU-40/B CBU-107/B GBU-41/B CBU-113/B GBU-42/B CBU-115/B GBU-43/B M-81 GBU-44/B M-82 GBU-48/B M-83 GBU-49/B M-84 GBU-50/B M-117 GBU-51/B M-118 GBU-52/B ROCKET LAUNCHERS HJ-9 (China) Matra Durandal LAU-3 (19 X 2.75”) HJ-10 (China) Flechette (WWI) LAU-32 (7 X 2.75”) IRIS-T (Germany) Ranken dart (WWI British) LAU-61 (19 X 2.75”) MBDA Exocet (France) Blockbuster bomb (WWII LAU-68 (7 X 2.75”) MBDA Meteor (Europe) British) LAU-69 (19 X 2.75”) MBDA MICA (Europe) Bouncing bomb (WWII British) LAU-130 (19 X 2.75”) MBDA Magic II (France) SC250 bomb (WWII Germany) LAU-131
    [Show full text]
  • A/C Serial No
    A/C SERIAL NO. XG337 SECTION 2B INDIVIDUAL HISTORY ENGLISH ELECTRIC LIGHTNING F.1 XG337/8056M MUSUM ACCESSION NUMBER 84/A/1167 Built by English Electric Aviation Ltd at Warton, Lancs to 1954 contract No. 6/Acft/10351/CB7 (b) as the last of a batch of 20 English Electric P1Bs (Pre Production batch Lightning F.1s, more commonly referred to as Development Batch aircraft) for development and familiarisation use; Serials batch XG325 - XG337, allocated 25 February 1954. Constructor’s number 95026. 5 Sep 59 First flight, from Samlesbury, Lancs; pilot J.K. Isherwood. Flown, for the duration of its career, in overall silver/natural metal finish. 10 Mar 60 Awaiting collection; to Ministry of Aviation C. (A) fleet the same day. 29 Apr 60 To English Electric at Warton for fuel system trials. 26 Aug 60 to C (A) for trial use with ‘A’ Squadron Aeroplane & Armaments Experimental Establishment, Boscombe Down, Wilts. Flying time to date 28.01. Used as back up for radio clearance trials on XG325 and extension of Mach number limit for the Lightning F.1. Dec 60 To Royal Signals & Radar Establishment/Royal Aircraft Establishment for Auto ILS trials. Photo at Boscombe Down, February 1961 - Lightning (Scott) p.96. 16 May 61 To English Electric at Warton for change & rectification of throttle box prior to continuation of A&AEE auto-I.LS trials. Flying time 55.13 hours. 7 Jul 61 To ‘A’ Squadron, A&AEE, Boscombe Down for continuation of auto-ILS trials; flying time 58.55 hours. 12 Dec 61 To the Boulton Paul company airfield at Seighford, near Stafford, Staffs for conversion work including fitting of instrumentation and stage 3 fin (needed when Red Top Missile fitted) for Lightning F.3 flight development programme undertaken by Boulton Paul Aircraft Ltd on behalf of English Electric.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1957 Defence White Paper the Cancelled Projects
    Journal of Aeronautical History Paper No. 2018/03 The 1957 Defence White Paper The Cancelled Projects Tony Buttler SUMMARY This paper, which is based on a presentation to a seminar on the 1957 Defence White Paper, describes the aircraft and engine projects that were cancelled as a direct result of the policies announced in the White Paper. It also describes a number of aircraft projects that were cancelled or on which development ceased in the mid-1950s. These are often identified as casualties of the White Paper, although that was not the case. One consequence of the 1957 White Paper was the decision by Hawkers to develop the P.1127 after it became clear that there would not be a British market for the P.1121 supersonic air superiority strike fighter. The Harrier was developed from the P.1127, which changed the face of high performance combat aircraft operations and is one of the most important of all developments in UK aviation history. 1. INTRODUCTION This paper is based on a presentation to a seminar on the 1957 Defence White Paper (1) (DWP) on 24 October 2017 by the Historical Group of the Royal Aeronautical Society. It considers the airframe and engine projects which were terminated by the White Paper, but first I would like to mention three projects which were NOT cancelled by this document, but which many publications say were, often I think to try to make out that the DWP had even more of an effect on UK military projects than it perhaps did. When assessing these programmes, it should be borne in mind that Harold McMillan became Prime Minister in January 1957 and he then made Duncan Sandys his Minister of Defence – so all three projects had already gone by the time Sandys began work on this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Steel Trials South Australia 1957 - 1965
    Blue Steel Trials South Australia 1957 - 1965 0 Welcome .....................................................................................................................................................2 From the Committee ...............................................................................................................................2 Terry Clark - 4JSTU ...............................................................................................................................2 Keith Rendell - EMI.............................................................................................................................2 Dennis Pfeiffer - A.V.Roe & Co ................................................................................................................3 Bert Grove – Huntings............................................................................................................................3 Gordon Mepham - 4JSTU......................................................................................................................3 David Lloyd - Elliotts ............................................................................................................................3 Bryan Wetton - 4JSTU...........................................................................................................................3 Lives after Blue Steel – personal reminiscences.....................................................................................5 Leon Webke ........................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • January-February 2021
    Avro’s Astounding Anson Black Sands Fly-in Oxford Wings With Wheels January -February 2021 f3 21-1 January-February 2021 Edition 54 Page 3 Page 6 Page 10 Page 14 Page 17 Page 18 Recwings Contents is produced by a keen group of individuals within the Canterbury Black Sands Fly-in 3 Recreational Aircraft Club. Avro’s Astounding Anson 6 Non-club members can subscribe to the e-mailed edition - please 2021 Events 9 contact [email protected]. Printed Oxford Wheels with Wings 10 copies are available to club RAANZ Roadshow 10 members at the CRAC House. Radiotelephony 14 For back issues, head to The Hubbard Flying Opportunity 17 www.crac.co.nz/magazines A Lightning Build! 18 Contributions for the next edition Committee Notes December 2020 22 are due by March 10th, 2021. We invite contributions from all, with Fuel at Foxpine 22 editorial discretion being final. Upcoming Events 23 Brian Greenwood New Members 23 [email protected] Congratulations 23 All images and written works in this magazine are copyright to their respective authors. Cover, Dave Phillips piloting Bill Reid’s Avro Anson I in style, Yealands Classic Fighters Omaka 2019 © 2021 Brian Greenwood 2 Recwings Black Sands Fly-in Tim Ward At last the stars aligned. A superb weather forecast, based ourselves at the adjacent camping ground. afternoon low tide, and a clean beach surface were We met up with my other son Angus who had perfect for the annual black sands fly-in at Gibson flown up to Hamilton after work. He flies for Air Beach.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Heritage Significance
    The former RAF Coltishall: Statement of Heritage Significance Dr Richard C. Maguire Lecturer in Public History The Landscape Group c/o School of History University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ January 2013 © 2013 The Landscape Group Page 1 1. Executive Summary Key Points for Information • The aerodrome at the former RAF Coltishall began as an Expansion Period airfield (late 1930s) and was typical of its type. • After the Second World War the airfield was subject to successive layers of modification to allow its aircraft to operate in the nuclear/Cold War context. • In consequence, the military site is best understood as a hybrid Expansion/Cold War landscape. • The site retains a number of late Expansion Period/WW2 (1935-45) aerodrome buildings and design features. None of these are, however, unique to the region or the country. • The fighter pen type-A, which has already been scheduled, is a significant WW2 location and is of national importance. • The military cemetery is an important memorial location connected with the site. • The Cold War history of the site should be considered in the context of British nuclear weapons history, which shaped the site as we now see it. • The station had two nuclear weapons-related roles in the early Cold War. The first was the interception of incoming Soviet nuclear bombers. The second was as a dispersal airfield for the British nuclear bombing squadrons. • In the later Cold War the Jaguar squadrons also had a nuclear attack role, along with a conventional ground attack role. • The Cold War landscape now dominates the site, although the Expansion Period buildings remain, they have been subsumed into this later landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • By Steve A. Evans
    Feature Build No.1 Downloadable Content De Havilland Sea Vixen by Steve A. Evans Technical Data De Havilland Sea Vixen Scale: 1/48th Manufacturer: Airfix Excellent art, instantly recognisable Airfix box Kit No: A11002 and lots of information on the outside, with Material: IM some great looking stuff on the inside too Price: £OOP Valiant Wings Modelling • © March 2015 1 VWM Feature Build No.1 • De Havilland Sea Vixen • Page 1 of 10 Cockpit interior is always going to be a bit dull in black but the moulded detail is superb The seats aren’t too bad with some homemade belts, but there are plenty of replacement items out there if you’d prefer? rfix has been through quite before in this scale by Dynavector but that a lot in its chequered his- was a vac-form kit that needed some very tory, with multiple take- serious love and attention if it was going to overs and collaborations be built to any great standard. with other companies as Awell as beingi declared bankrupt on more The kit than one occasion. Thankfully, with the buy- Airfix now have not only an instantly recog- out of the Airfix brand by Hornby, it looks as nisable logo but their boxes are now taking though this truly historic icon of a kit maker on a very ‘corporate’ look with similar styles has been saved from extinction and is and layouts for all the kits. This is most no- (finally) now producing some great looking, ticeable in the big red borders and splashes modern kits.
    [Show full text]