Title of Manuscript
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Zeleni Alati Za Održivu Revoluciju Zagreb, Ožujak 2007
Bruno Motik Dražen Šimleša Zeleni alati za održivu revoluciju Zagreb, ožujak 2007. www.stocitas.org www.zmag.hr Autori: Bruno Motik i Dražen Šimleša Izdavači: Što čitaš i ZMAG Skeniranje i obrada ilustracija: Bruno Motik Grafička obrada: Marko Strpić Na našoj internet stranici potražite ostala izdanja i velik broj besplatnih elektroničkih knjiga i tekstova: www.stocitas.org 2 Sadržaj Uvod 5 Ekološki otisak - kako gazimo planet? 8 Hrvatska – mala zemlja za preveliki otisak 15 Permakultura – trajna revolucija 22 Pazi, hrana pada 26 Praktični savjeti za stvaranje permakulturnog vrta 33 Permakluturni dizajn 57 Izumiranje naftnog dinosaura 66 Zelena energija 76 Energija sunca 79 Energija vjetra 94 Transport 104 Energija biomase 107 Graditeljstvo 127 Održivo graditeljstvo 132 Otpad 153 Voda 162 Organizacija 174 Kako hodati nježnije - gradske priče 182 Prema praktičnim stazama održivosti 191 Literatura 202 3 4 UVOD Najbolje vrijeme za posaditi stablo bilo je prije deset godina. Slijedeće najbolje vrijeme je sad. Kineska poslovica U redu, najbolje vrijeme za objaviti ovakvu knjigu bilo je prije deset godina. Ali što da se radi. Prije deset godina smo brijali na pank, klupice u parku, gutali fanzine i šivali prišivke do zauvijek. Lagali bi kad bismo rekli da nam je žao. Uostalom, najljepša i najjača iskrica koja nas je zapalila za anarhopank – uradi sam kultura – danas je zaista prišivena na našim srcima. I što ćeš normalnije nego da mi nakon deset godina napišemo ovakvu knjigu. Zato jer je sad slijedeće najbolje vrijeme. Prije četiri godine smo krenuli u stvaranje Recikliranog imanja, našeg odsanjanog životnog prostora, ali i otvorenog edukacijskog centra. No, osim otvorenih srca i brda energije nismo imali previše znanja i vještina kako izgraditi jednu takvu priču. -
Climate Change Risk Perceptions of Audiences in the Climate Change Blogosphere
Article Climate Change Risk Perceptions of Audiences in the Climate Change Blogosphere Supplement 1. Climate Change Blogs that Published the Survey 1. ... and Then There’s Physics This blog is run by Ken Rice, a Professor of Computational Astrophysics at the University of Edinburgh. While the blog’s initial goal was to address climate science claims made on Watts Up With That, the blog now has a wider scope on climate change. In 2019, the blog published 100 blog posts. A typical post receives between 50–200 comments approximately. Link to survey: https://andthentheresphysics.wordpress.com/2019/10/09/a-survey-of-blog- audiences/ 2. Brussels Blog The Brussels Blog is run by Geoff Beacon, who mostly writes about climate science and the need for climate change adaptation and climate mitigation. In 2019, the blog published 32 blog posts. A typical blog post receives between 0-5 comments approximately. Link to survey: http://www.brusselsblog.co.uk/a-survey-for-research-at-cambridge-and- wageningen-universities/ 3. Climate Action Australia Climate Action Australia is run by John Pratt, who mostly writes about the need for climate change action and posts about different climate events. A typical blog post receives between 0-5 comments approximately. Link to survey: https://climateactionaustralia.wordpress.com/ 4. Climate Denial Crock of the Week This blog is run by Peter Sinclair, a videographer specializing in issues of climate change and renewable energy solutions. Sinclair has produced more than 100 videos on his blog, which are “sharply satirical and scientifically rigorous responses to the many bits of climate science misinformation, and disinformation, often seen on the internet, which Mr. -
Invitation Letter
Dear [name removed]: On March 2-4, The Heartland Institute will host an International Conference on Climate Change, a three-day conference in New York City bringing together leading scientists, economists, legislators, and policy analysts from around the world to discuss climate change and related issues. I’m writing to ask you to consider being a speaker at the conference. We’ll cover your travel expenses and provide an honorarium of $1,000. Your presentation will be transcribed and published as a chapter in a book in 2008. Dates and Logistics The International Conference on Climate Change will take place at the Marriott Marquis Times Square Hotel, 1535 Broadway, in the Theater District of Midtown Manhattan. The purpose of the conference is to generate international media attention to the fact that many scientists believe forecasts of rapid warming and catastrophic events are not supported by sound science, and that expensive campaigns to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are not necessary or cost-effective. The event will be promoted with paid advertising in the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Times, and possibly other publications; news releases, interviews, and other advance communication with major media outlets; on-site accommodations for media, including talk radio show hosts; and same-day webcasting of the presentations during the conference. The Heartland Institute also offers free admission and expense reimbursements to elected officials. We expect a large number of elected officials to attend the event, and total attendance to be about 500. Topics and Format Each speaker will participate on a panel addressing a climate change subtopic. -
Part I: Introduction
Part I: Introduction “Perhaps the sentiments contained in the following pages are not yet sufficiently fashionable to procure them general favor; a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defense of custom. But the tumult soon subsides. Time makes more converts than reason.” -Thomas Paine, Common Sense (1776) “For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it.” -Patrick Henry (1776) “I am aware that many object to the severity of my language; but is there not cause for severity? I will be as harsh as truth. On this subject I do not wish to think, or speak, or write, with moderation. No! No! Tell a man whose house is on fire to give a moderate alarm; tell him to moderately rescue his wife from the hands of the ravisher; tell the mother to gradually extricate her babe from the fire into which it has fallen -- but urge me not to use moderation in a cause like the present. The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal, and to hasten the resurrection of the dead.” -William Lloyd Garrison, The Liberator (1831) “Gas is running low . .” -Amelia Earhart (July 2, 1937) 1 2 Dear Reader, Civilization as we know it is coming to an end soon. This is not the wacky proclamation of a doomsday cult, apocalypse bible prophecy sect, or conspiracy theory society. -
Climate Change: Addressing the Major Skeptic Arguments
Climate Change: Addressing the Major Skeptic Arguments September 2010 Whitepaper available online: http://www.dbcca.com/research Carbon Counter widget available for download at: www.Know-The-Number.com Research Team Authors Mary-Elena Carr, Ph.D. Kate Brash Associate Director Assistant Director Columbia Climate Center, Earth Institute Columbia Climate Center, Earth Institute Columbia University Columbia University Robert F. Anderson, Ph.D. Ewing-Lamont Research Professor Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University DB Climate Change Advisors – Climate Change Investment Research Mark Fulton Bruce M. Kahn, Ph.D. Managing Director Director Global Head of Climate Change Investment Research Senior Investment Analyst Nils Mellquist Emily Soong Vice President Associate Senior Research Analyst Jake Baker Lucy Cotter Associate Research Analyst 2 Climate Change: Addressing the Major Skeptic Arguments Editorial Mark Fulton Global Head of Climate Change Investment Research Addressing the Climate Change Skeptics The purpose of this paper is to examine the many claims and counter-claims being made in the public debate about climate change science. For most of this year, the volume of this debate has turned way up as the ‘skeptics’ launched a determined assault on the climate findings accepted by the overwhelming majority of the scientific community. Unfortunately, the increased noise has only made it harder for people to untangle the arguments and form their own opinions. This is problematic because the way the public’s views are shaped is critical to future political action on climate change. For investors in particular, the implications are huge. While there are many arguments in favor of clean energy, water and sustainable agriculture – for instance, energy security, economic growth, and job opportunities – we at DB Climate Change Advisors (DBCCA) have always said that the science is one essential foundation of the whole climate change investment thesis. -
Countering Skepticism, Denial, and Despair
CHAPTER 7 Countering Skepticism, Denial, and Despair he alarming prospect of not only a hotter world, higher sea levels, more intense T storm events, and flooding, but also increased disease, fresh water and food shortages, supply chain disruptions, and other national and global security stresses may, understandably, trigger a variety of reactions, from denial and despair to fear and sadness. For some, there’s an understandable tendency to look the other way and focus on more immediate concerns. One natural response to being confronted with climate change bad news is to doubt the science or question the scientists. Can it really be as bad as all of that? Are the scientists mistaken? Could they be missing something? Such skepticism is natural and important. Educators often struggle to encourage healthy skepticism and critical thinking among their learners, so when introducing climate and energy topics, finding out what naïve ideas, misconceptions, or doubts they have is an important starting point. Knowing that skepticism is the lifeblood of science, John Cook, an Australian scientist long interested in climate change, started his website Skeptical Science in 2007 as a response to comments by U.S. politicians that climate change was a hoax. Over the years, Cook (2014) and his team have assembled a collection of over 170 arguments against the hoax charge. Their site (http://www.skepticalscience.com) is used by educa- tors and even scientists not familiar with all the current research and is especially help- ful in being able to counter common statements that arise in discussing climate and energy issues. Taking a layered approach by first presenting the myth, then providing a basic as well as more intermediate understanding of the current science countering the myth, the Skeptical Science team analyzed the merit of the arguments in detail. -
Local Archive
Proof that mankind causes KyotoKyotoKyoto basedbasedbased flawedflawedflawed Today’s temperatures are supposedly higher than at any time in the past thousand years. This claim is the central pillar of the Kyoto Protocol, which takes effect this month. It is largely based on the celebrated ‘hockey stick’ graph of temperature history since the year 1000, published by Michael Mann and colleagues in 1998 and 1999. However, according to Canadian researchers Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, Mann’s hockey stick is no more than a statistical artifact. Their quest to verify the accuracy of this pi- votal study of global warming raises questions about the integrity of world climate research. Author: Marcel Crok, Natuurwetenschap & Techniek Translation: Angela den Tex Peter Kleiner, www.terradreams.de Peter Kleiner, climate change is refuted protocolprotocolprotocol ononon statisticsstatisticsstatistics Mann versus McIntyre This is Mann’s famous hockey stick chart. The reconstruction runs until 1980. In the 20th Century, Mann’s (black curve) and McIntyre’s reconstruction (green curve) are virtually synchronous with the measured temperature. The discussion focuses mainly on the 15th century. McIntyre’s measure- ments, based on the conventional principal component analysis but without the mistakes in Mann’s data, show much higher temperatures. Few people dispute that the earth is getting warmer, but there the same data, temperatures in the 15th Century were just as are people – so-called “climate skeptics” – who question high as they are today – an outcome that takes the edge off the whether the change is historically unique and whether it is the alarmist scenario of anthropogenic global warming. result of human activity.These skeptics are generally outsiders, The criticism by the Canadians is mostly technical in reviled by ”true” climate researchers. -
A Rational Discussion of Climate Change: the Science, the Evidence, the Response
A RATIONAL DISCUSSION OF CLIMATE CHANGE: THE SCIENCE, THE EVIDENCE, THE RESPONSE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION NOVEMBER 17, 2010 Serial No. 111–114 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 62–618PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HON. BART GORDON, Tennessee, Chair JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois RALPH M. HALL, Texas EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER JR., LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California Wisconsin DAVID WU, Oregon LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas BRIAN BAIRD, Washington DANA ROHRABACHER, California BRAD MILLER, North Carolina ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois VERNON J. EHLERS, Michigan GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, Arizona FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois MARCIA L. FUDGE, Ohio W. TODD AKIN, Missouri BEN R. LUJA´ N, New Mexico RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas PAUL D. TONKO, New York BOB INGLIS, South Carolina STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas JIM MATHESON, Utah MARIO DIAZ-BALART, Florida LINCOLN DAVIS, Tennessee BRIAN P. BILBRAY, California BEN CHANDLER, Kentucky ADRIAN SMITH, Nebraska RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia BARON P. HILL, Indiana PETE OLSON, Texas HARRY E. MITCHELL, Arizona CHARLES A. WILSON, Ohio KATHLEEN DAHLKEMPER, Pennsylvania ALAN GRAYSON, Florida SUZANNE M. -
Characterising the Anthropocene: Ecological Degradation in Italian Twenty-First Century Literary Writing
Characterising the Anthropocene: Ecological Degradation in Italian Twenty-First Century Literary Writing by Alessandro Macilenti A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Italian Literature. Victoria University of Wellington 2015 Abstract The twenty-first century has witnessed the exacerbation of ecological issues that began to manifest themselves in the mid-twentieth century. It has become increasingly clear that the current environmental crisis poses an unprecedented existential threat to civilization as well as to Homo sapiens itself. Whereas the physical and social sciences have been defining the now inevitable transition to a different (and more inhospitable) Earth, the humanities have yet to assert their role as a transformative force within the context of global environmental change. Turning abstract issues into narrative form, literary writing can increase awareness of environmental issues as well as have a deep emotive influence on its readership. To showcase this type of writing as well as the methodological frameworks that best highlights the social and ethical relevance of such texts alongside their literary value, I have selected the following twenty-first century Italian literary works: Roberto Saviano’s Gomorra, Kai Zen’s Delta blues, Wu Ming’s Previsioni del tempo, Simona Vinci’s Rovina, Giancarlo di Cataldo’s Fuoco!, Laura Pugno’s Sirene, and Alessandra Montrucchio’s E poi la sete, all published between 2006 and 2011. The main goal of this study is to demonstrate how these works offer an invaluable opportunity to communicate meaningfully and accessibly the discomforting truths of global environmental change, including ecomafia, waste trafficking, illegal building, arson, ozone depletion, global warming and the dysfunctional relationship between humanity and the biosphere. -
Relocalization.Network
2006 Relocalization Network Report relocalization.network www.relocalize.net The Relocalization Network is an initiative of Post Carbon Institute © 2007 The Relocalization Network annual report welcome Greetings Best Wishes from the Network Team The 2006 year saw many changes for the Relocalization Network: the number of Local Groups in the Network almost doubled, we launched the website www.relocalize.net, and we started building and improving our library of resources and support services. We thank everyone for their patience in working with us through this process of learning and experimenting with different tools and techniques for improving the foundation of the Relocalization Network. We are grateful to have had the opportunity to work with so many wonderful people. Over the next year we look forward to building stronger connections with everyone in the Relocalization Network and to continuing to learn and adapt as we move towards a future less dependant on fossil fuels. All the best, Relocalization Network Team About this report This report provides information about the Relocalization Network for groups and individuals interested in getting involved and starting Relocalization projects in their communities. It includes a brief history of the Relocalization Network, and an overview of the year’s projects and events. If you have any questions about the material presented here, please contact us at [email protected]. relocalization.network 2006 Annual Report 2 The Relocalization Network annual report background and contents Background Contents The Relocalization Network was created in 2003 as one of the first initiatives of Post Carbon Institute. It developed as a response to individuals’ questions about how they 3 The Relocalization Network: could take action to address the implications of peak oil. -
Aspo in Lisbon
$65.00 per year $6.00 U.S. A Nonpartisan Non-sectarian MAP for the Here That Is, Into the Tomorrow of Our Own Making Vol. VIII, No. 4 ——–—————–———————————————————–—–——–———————— July 12, 2005 Special Edition © Copyright 2005 A.S.P.O.A.S.P.O. ININ LISBONLISBON ByBy JameyJamey Hecht,Hecht, PhDPhD Richard Heinberg and Julian Darley of the Post-Carbon Institute "This is just silly," said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy and Economic Research in Winchester, Mass. "It's not like industrial civilization is going to come crashing down." -- Associated Press article of May 24 2005, “GLOBAL ENERGY CRUNCH: Oil peak predicted; Some analysts predict irreversible slide for world's reserves” By Matt Crenson [June 16, 2005 1400 PST (FTW) -- LISBON] When FTW covered the third annual meeting of A.S.P.O. last year in Berlin, we found a bracingly clear picture of the impending world oil shortage. The analysis was powerful, but it remained inside the scientific culture that produced it; journalists were left to wonder how on Earth the dire facts would ever get through to the public without a massive nongov- ernmental outreach program of some kind. As Michael Ruppert wrote in his report, "It felt strange to discuss Peak Oil in a purely data- driven way while knowing how utterly it will shatter our growth-driven industrial civilization." During May 19 and 20, 2005 in the central building of Lisbon's Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation (Av. de Berna 45 A), A.S.P.O. had a (Cont’d on page 3) Page -1- From the Wilderness Michael C. -
Peak Everything Runningrunning Outout Ofof Commoditiescommodities Inin Aa Crowdedcrowded Worldworld
Pollution Ocean Stocks Food Decline Peak Everything RunningRunning OutOut ofof CommoditiesCommodities inin aa CrowdedCrowded WorldWorld Desertification Climate Change GaryGary McMurtryMcMurtry Social Unrest Peak Oil Extinctions History of Earth’s Human Population Graph Credit: Dr. William Stanton From: Nate Hagens; http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4450 Peak Oil, Carrying Capacity & Overshoot: From: http://canada.theoildrum.com/node/2516 (Paul Chefurka) Peak Oil, Carrying Capacity & Overshoot: From: http://canada.theoildrum.com/node/2516 (Paul Chefurka) Peak Oil, Carrying Capacity & Overshoot: You Are Here From: http://canada.theoildrum.com/node/2516 (Paul Chefurka) USA Oil Production History & Projection The US lower-48 production peak (Texas + Rest of USA) occurred in 1970; In 1956, M. King Hubbert predicted this outcome to within a few years. Where the USA Currently Gets Its Imported Oil (>60%) Cantarell Giant Oil Field, Mexico -20% ! Export Land Model Jeffery Brown and Sam Foucher - www.theoildrum.com Hubbert’s Predictions Exxon Mobile data M. King Hubbert 1903-1989 From: K. S. Deffeyes, Hubbert’s Peak (2001) Hubbert’s Global Production Predictions, 1970 Predictive Global Models from “WebHubbleTelescope”, TheOilDrum.com Production “Rug Pushing” 40 years Extended Plateau Cliff! Source: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2376 and links therein. World Liquids Production, 1980-2008 From: EIA data; http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3720 Crude Oil Production by Country 2001-2008 Bottom-Up (Mega-Projects) Prediction Possible future supply capacity scenario for crude oil and NGL based on the Wikipedia Oil Megaproject database. The resource base post-2002 decline rate is a linearly increasing rate from 0% to 4.5% between 2003 and 2008 then constant at 4.5% afterward.