DOCSLIB.ORG

Sample Full Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sample Full Technical Report Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Alternative Transportation Plan May 2014 DOT-VNTSC-FWS-14-01 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge – Comprehensive Alternative Transportation Plan 1-ii Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the objective of this document. Quality Assurance Statement The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge – Comprehensive Alternative Transportation Plan 1-iii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED May 2014 Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. FUNDING NUMBERS Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge – Comprehensive Alternative Transportation Plan VXN3 6. AUTHOR(S) 5b. CONTRACT NUMBER David Daddio, Benjamin Rasmussen, Jonathan Frazier, Erica Simmons, Luis Mejias 51VXN30000 MJ696 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) REPORT NUMBER U.S. Department of Transportation John A Volpe National Transportation Systems Center DOT-VNTSC-FWS-14-01 Transportation Planning Division 55 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142-1093 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING US Department of Interior AGENCY REPORT NUMBER US Fish and Wildlife Service Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge 1839 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE This document is available to the public at http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/52000/52700/52788/DOT-VNTSC- FWS-14-01.pdf. 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) The Comprehensive Alternative Transportation Plan for Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge in southwestern Oklahoma analyzes a range of transportation and resource management challenges and documents a holistic set of alternative transportation strategies that the refuge can implement in the short, medium, and long term. The Plan consists of four interrelated products: a traffic analysis study, a pedestrian and bicycle, a multi-modal network alternatives analysis, and a transit assessment. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES Alternative transportation, public lands transportation, pedestrian and bicycle transportation, transit, 183 shuttle bus service, recreational transportation 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT Unlimited Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 298-102 Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge – Comprehensive Alternative Transportation Plan 1-iv Report Notes and Acknowledgments The U.S. Department of Transportation John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center), in Cambridge, Massachusetts, prepared this report for the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge. The project team consisted of David Daddio (project manager), Benjamin Rasmussen, Jonathan Frazier, Erica Simmons, and Luis Mejias of the Transportation Planning Division. The project team would like to thank the following individuals for graciously providing their time, knowledge, and guidance during the development of this plan: Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Tony Booth Refuge Manager Ralph Bryant Deputy Refuge Manager Susan Howell Visitor Services Manager Heidi Beierle Transportation Scholar Quinton Smith Park Ranger, Visitor Services U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Steve Kettler Biologist Robert O’Brien Regional Transportation Program Coordinator Central Federal Lands Highway Division Laurie Miskimins Transportation Planner Other Dr. Ben Cooper Fit Kids of Southwest Oklahoma Dwight Cope Town of Medicine Park Jonathan Cybulski John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Rebecca Gleason Western Transportation Institute Doug Kemper Medicine Park Museum of Natural Science Aaron Peterson Fort Sill Richard Rogalski City of Lawton Planning Department Kyle Rogers Fit Kids of Southwest Oklahoma Gary Rushing Lawton Area Transit System Sharon Sheffert Oklahoma Department of Transportation Brenda Spencer-Ragland Fort Still Larry Walcott City of Lawton Public Works Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge – Comprehensive Alternative Transportation Plan 1-v Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. 1-vii List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................... 1-viii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1-ix 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1-1 2. Traffic Analysis Study .................................................................................................... 2-i 3. Bicycle and Pedestrian Resource Guide ......................................................................... 3-i 4. Multi-Modal Network Alternatives Analysis .................................................................. 4-i 5. Transit Assessment ....................................................................................................... 5-i 6. Summary of Recommendations ................................................................................... 6-1 Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge – Comprehensive Alternative Transportation Plan 1-vii List of Acronyms Abbreviation Term AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ADA Americans with Disabilities Act ADT Average Daily Traffic ATS Alternative Transportation System CATP Comprehensive Alternative Transportation Plan CFLHD Central Federal Lands Highway Division CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality EPA Environmental Protection Agency FHWA Federal Highway Administration FLAP Federal Lands Access Program FLMA Federal Land Management Agency FLTP Federal Lands Transportation Program FWS Fish and Wildlife Service GIS Geographic Information System GPS Global Positioning System HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program ITS Intelligent Transportation System LATS Lawton Area Transit System LETRA Lake Elmer Thomas Recreation Area LMPO Lawton MPO LOS Level of Service MUTCD Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NPS National Park Service NWR National Wildlife Refuge NWRS National Wildlife Refuge System ODOT Oklahoma Department of Transportation PBCAT Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Analysis Tool PBIC Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center PTSF Percent Time Spent Following RTP Recreational Trails Program SRTS Safe Routes to School STP Surface Transportation Program TAG Transportation Assistance Group TAP Transportation Alternatives Program TRIPTAC Transit in the Parks Technical Assistance Center USGS United States Geological Survey WMWR Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge – Comprehensive Alternative Transportation Plan 1-viii Executive Summary Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge (WMWR) faces many transportation and recreation challenges associated with its current visitation patterns, including: • Parking lot congestion, which often requires refuge law enforcement resources • Heavy visitation to sensitive natural areas on the western side of the refuge • Bicyclist roadway safety issues within and approaching the refuge • Limited access opportunities for populations without access to a private vehicle Following transportation improvements presented in a 2010 Alternative Transportation Study (ATS) conducted by the U.S. Department of Transportation John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center), the refuge received funding for the construction of a nonmotorized trail, the development of an intelligent transportation system, and completion of this Comprehensive Alternative Transportation Plan (CATP).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Civilian Conservation Corps As Means of Social
    THE CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS AS MEANS OF SOCIAL CONTROL: A SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA PERSPECTIVE By LEON CHAD KINDER Bachelor of Science Southwestern Oklahoma State University Weatherford, Oklahoma 1993 Master of Education Southwestern Oklahoma State University Weatherford, Oklahoma 1995 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION December, 2003 Tueiis 2DD3D K5lc THE CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS AS MEANS OF SOCIAL CONTROL: A SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA PERSPECTIVE Thesis Approved: ,~(l,g ,, Thesis Advisor ~ Dean of the Graduate College 11 PREFACE I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Lowell Caneday, my dissertation advisor, for the many hours he spent in support of my work. To Dr. Christine Cashel, doctoral committee chair, my deepest appreciation is extended. Thanks is also expressed to the other members of the doctoral committee, Dr. William Bryans, Dr. Colleen Hood, and Dr. Thomas Kuzmic for their time, suggestions, and support given in the development of this project. I also wish to express thanks to my mentor, Dr. Ken Rose, Dean of the School of Professional and Graduate Studies at Southwestern Oklahoma State University, for his assistance and support during my doctoral work. To my wife Gayla, children Natalie and Carson, and members of my extended family a special thanks is given. Thank-you all for your love and support. 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION, STATEMENT OF THESIS AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ......................................... 1 Introduction and Statement of Thesis ............................ 1 The Great Depression ............................................. .2 The Great Depression in Oklahoma .............................. 3 Hoover's Response to the Great Depression ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of Lawton, Oklahoma
    Highlights of Lawton, Oklahoma The Community The City of Lawton, Oklahoma, founded in 1901, is the fifth largest city in Oklahoma and the county seat of Comanche County, in Southwest Oklahoma. Lawton is located approximately 90 miles southwest of Oklahoma City along Interstate 44. Fort Sill, an active U.S. Army installation, is on the City’s north side and is within the city limits as the result of annexation in the 1990s. Comanche County is home to more than 122,000 residents as of 2017, with Lawton accounting for 94,000 of the countywide population – smaller cities and towns including Cache, Chattanooga. Elgin, Faxon, Fletcher, Geronimo, Indiahoma, Medicine Park, and Sterling make up the remainder. Mild Winters, Warm Summers The mean temperature for the Lawton area is 61.5 degrees. The percentage of sunshine in Lawton ranges from an average of about 60 percent in the winter to nearly 80 percent in the summer, providing a long growing season of 215 days. The July high is around 95 degrees. Summers are generally warm with 95 days of 90 degrees or higher. The winter months are typically mild with an average low temperature in January of 27 degrees. Annual precipitation ranges from about 30 inches in western Comanche County to 33 inches in the east, slightly less than the U.S. average of 39 inches. Annual snowfall averages 3.6 inches while the average U.S. city gets 26 inches of snow per year. Cost of Living Lawton remains a low cost-of-living city relative to both the nation and Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Today Spring 1980 Volume 30 No. 2
    HONORABLE GEORGE NIGH Great Plains Country Enters The 1980s .....................4 Governor By Sue Carter VOLUME 30 NUMBER 2 SPRING 1980 Mountain Climbers' Paradise: Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge. ... 8 By Paul McCl~ng SUE CARTER PAUL E. LEFEBVRE Editor Art and Production BlLL BUSCH Dauntless Gold Seekers of the Wichitas .................... 11 C~rculat~on and Promotion By Steve Wilson Published hy the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreauon Deparln~enl Delores Buffalo Takes Us To Indian City. ..... BvJoye R. Boulton COMMISSION MEMBERS LT. GOV. SPENCER BERNARD BOB HODDER JIM PATE Wedding at Holy City. ..... Chalrman Oklahoma C~tyV~ce Chalrman Mad111 Secretary By Sheila Samples JAKE J SIMMONS. JR LARRY FIELD Muskogee Guymon Pageantry, Tradition Follow The Artillery Hunt .... BOB HINTON CELlA ROSENBERGER WR DICK STUBBS By Sheila Samples Altus Tulsa Henryetta BILL KELLOW. Dlr ABE L HESSER RON ACREE. Dlr Red Rock Canyon Family Reunion. ...... Tour~smPromollon Plannlng & Development Execut~veD~rector By Judith Wall W D JOHNSON. Dlr ROBERT A PIKE Dlr KEN FLAMING Dlr Adm~n~strat~on State Parks State Lodges Quartz Mountain Resort Fascinates Hikers .................. 25 11 1s Ihe purvose 01 Oklahoma Today lo dovole llself lo Ihe enule stale 01 Oklaho~naand 11s evay poslllve aspecl the scenery culture recreallonal and vls~lorallracllny evenls 11s lndustly nalural and By John Davis man made wonders 11s achievements 11s herrlage 11s presenl and 11s tulure Quartz Visitors Discover The World of Jeff Briley, Naturalist. ...... 27 502 WILL ROGERS BUILDING .Oklahoma C~ty73105 .(405) 521-2496 By Gary Lantz $5 00 Pel Year In U S S9 00 Elsewhere SI 25 Srnyle Copy Copyr~ghl1980 by Oklahoma Today Mayazrne L~lho111 Oklaho~na Restaurant Diners Enjoy Tales Of Oklahoma's First Resort .......
    [Show full text]
  • Refuge Update
    WICHITA MOUNTAINS CLIMBERS COALITION Exposure WMCC Newsletter Volume 10, Fall/Winter 2011 Dedicated to Protecting the Climbing Resources and Natural Environment of the Wichita Mountains After a long hiatus, the WMCC’s Exposure Newsletter, is relaunched, Table of Contents Fixed Anchor Mgmt...........................8 reconnecting our local climbing Refuge Update....................................1 ABC Update........................................9 community and keeping climbers WMCC History...................................2 In Remembrance...............................10 abreast of news, events, and happenings From the Refuge Manager.................4 Tread Lightly......................................11 in the Wichita Mountains. Within this document you will find links to Events Report......................................5 Perspective.........................................12 additional online resources. We hope Quartz Update....................................6 WMCC Membership........................14 you’ll find this updated issue of Announcements..................................7 Purpose and Board...........................14 Exposure both informative and helpful. continue to be managed as it has, to would continue; replacement of fixed Refuge Update “Alternative C” which completely anchors would be allowed and new fixed eliminates rock climbing. However, the anchors would be very limited. The Comprehensive Conservation Plan “Proposed Alternative,” Alternate B, current review process in place would continue to include the WMCC Advisory The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is Bolting Committee (ABC) for evaluation working on a long-term management with the Refuge making the final plan for the Wichita Mountains Wildlife approval. Refuge. This plan, called a Comprehensive Conservation Plan The Draft CCP was originally slated to (CCP), will serve as a guide for managing arrive in Fall of 2011 but that date appears the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge to have been pushed back a bit. The Final over the next 15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Route to Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge, Lawton OK
    Route to Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge, Lawton OK 147 miles total round trip – approximately 3 hrs not counting stops Attractions: Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Visitors Center Mount Scott Prairie dogs, Buffalo, Longhorns Medicine Park, OK This route takes you north through some of the scenic farm lands of Oklahoma west of the I-44 corridor. You will enter into the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge from the Fort Sill west range area. Stop at the Visitors center and see displays and history of the area. Eastward you can head toward Mount Scott that overlooks Lakes Elmer Thomas and Lawtonka. From Mount Scott you can head east to Medicine Park which is a little community with historical restaurants and shops. Wildlife Refuge From the MPEC, head right (West) on 5 th St and take a right (North) on the I-44 ramp Continue North past Burkburnett to the first exit just north of the OK border. Take the right ramp OK-36 North and you will pass 2 casinos on the left. Left at US-70/OK-36 heading West toward Grandfield, OK Right on OK-36 heading North (N2410 Rd) toward Chattanooga, OK Go through Chattanooga Left on N2430 Rd heading North toward Cache, OK Cross over US-62 continuing North (This is also County Hwy 115) Goes into Refuge Right on OK-49 and will see visitors center on your left. The refuge is large with several nice roads to ride that include roaming buffalo, Prairie dog towns, The Holy City and the small town of Mears which is known for its great hamburgers.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Intermediate-Mafic Magmatism
    Lithos 260 (2016) 164–177 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Lithos journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/lithos Cambrian intermediate-mafic magmatism along the Laurentian margin: Evidence for flood basalt volcanism from well cuttings in the Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen (U.S.A.) Matthew E. Brueseke a,⁎,JasperM.Hobbsa, Casey L. Bulen a, Stanley A. Mertzman b, Robert E. Puckett c, J. Douglas Walker d,JoshFeldmand a Department of Geology, Kansas State University, 108 Thompson Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States b Earth and Environment, Franklin and Marshall College, P.O. Box 3003, Lancaster, PA 17604-3003, United States c 12700 Arrowhead Lane, Oklahoma City, OK 73120, United States d Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, United States article info abstract Article history: The Southern Oklahoma Aulocogen (SOA) stretches from southern Oklahoma through the Texas panhandle and Received 24 February 2016 into Colorado and New Mexico, and contains mafic through silicic magmatism related to the opening of Accepted 28 May 2016 the Iapetus Ocean during the early Cambrian. Cambrian magmatic products are best exposed in the Wichita Available online 7 June 2016 Mountains (Oklahoma), where they have been extensively studied. However, their ultimate derivation is still somewhat contentious and centers on two very different models: SOA magmatism has been suggested to Keywords: occur via [1] continental rifting (with or without mantle plume emplacement) or [2] transform-fault related Basalt – Large igneous province magmatism (e.g., leaky strike slip faults). Within the SOA, the subsurface in and adjacent to the Arbuckle Rifting Mountains in southern Oklahoma contains thick sequences of mafic to intermediate lavas, intrusive bodies, Iapetus and phreatomagmatic deposits interlayered with thick, extensive rhyolite lavas, thin localized tuffs, and lesser Southern Oklahoma Aulocogen silicic intrusive bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge
    Alternative Transportation Study: WICHITA MOUNTAINS WILDLIFE REFUGE August 2010 Prepared for: Federal Highway Administration Central Federal Lands Highway Division Lakewood, CO U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Refuge Roads Program Division of Visitor Services and Communications Albuquerque, NM Prepared by: John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Research and Innovative Technologies Administration U.S. Department of Transportation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center), in coordination with the Federal Highway Administration - Central Federal Lands Highway Division and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), prepared this study with Refuge Roads Program funds. The project team included Charlotte Burger, Gabriel Lopez-Bernal, Luis Mejias, and Eric Plosky of the Volpe Center Systems Operations and Assessment Division. The authors wish to thank the numerous organizations and individuals who graciously provided their time, knowledge and guidance in the development of this report. Those of particular note are listed below: Jeff Rupert (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge) Ralph Bryant (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge) Bruce Booth (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge) Chip Kimball (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge) Susan Howell (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge) Vicki Swier (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge) Quinton Smith (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge) Susan Law (Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal Lands Highway Division) Nathan Caldwell (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Robert O'Brien (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ages of Pre-Rift Basement and Synrift Rocks Along the Conjugate Rift and Transform Margins of the Argentine Precordillera and Laurentia
    Making the Southern Margin of Laurentia themed issue Ages of pre-rift basement and synrift rocks along the conjugate rift and transform margins of the Argentine Precordillera and Laurentia William A. Thomas1, Robert D. Tucker2, Ricardo A. Astini3, and Rodger E. Denison4 1Geological Survey of Alabama, 420 Hackberry Lane, P.O. Box 869999, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35486-6999, USA 2U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, National Center, MS 926A, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA 3Laboratorio de Análisis de Cuencas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Avenida Velez Sarsfi eld 1611, Ofi cino 7, 2° Piso, X5016GCA Córdoba, Argentina 415141 Kingstree Drive, Dallas, Texas 75248, USA ABSTRACT with Grenville-age rocks along the conjugate 1996, 1999, 2003; Astini and Thomas, 1999; margins of the Precordillera and Laurentia. Ramos, 2004). The Laurentian origin of the Pre- New geochronologic data from basement Ages from one newly analyzed collection, cordillera terrane is based on a variety of data rocks support the interpretation that the however, are older than those from other from Precambrian basement rocks, Early Cam- Argentine Precordillera (Cuyania) terrane basement rocks in the Precordillera. These brian synrift deposits, and a Cambrian–Ordovi- was rifted from the Ouachita embayment of ages, from granodioritic-granitic basement cian passive-margin carbonate succession (e.g., the Iapetan margin of Laurentia. New data clasts in a conglomerate olistolith in Ordo- Astini et al., 1995; Astini, 1998; Astini and from the Ozark dome show a range of ages vician slope deposits, are 1370 ± 2 Ma and Thomas 1999; Thomas and Astini, 1999, 2003; in two groups at 1466 ± 3 to 1462 ± 1 Ma 1367 ± 5 Ma.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide
    Destinations OklahomaTeacher's Guide Content for this educational program provided by: CIMC Students of All Ages: Your adventure is about to begin! Within these pages you will become a “Geo-Detective” exploring the six countries of Oklahoma. Yes, countries! Within Oklahoma you’ll be traveling to unique places or regions called “countries.” Maybe you’ve heard of “Green Country” with its forests and specialty crops, or “Red Carpet Country,” named for the red rocks and soil formed during the ancient Permian age. Each region or country you visit will have special interesting themes or features, plus fun and sometimes challenging activities that you will be able to do. You will notice each country or region can be identifi ed by natural, economic, historic, cultural, geographic and geological features. The three maps you see on this page are examples of maps you might need for future Geo-Explorations. As a Geo-Detective having fun with the following activities, you’ll experience being a geographer and a geologist at the same time! So for starters, visit these websites and enjoy your Geo-Adventure: http://education.usgs.gov http://www.ogs.ou.edu http://www.census.gov http://www.travelok.com/site/links.asp Gary Gress, Geographer Neil Suneson, Geologist Oklahoma Alliance for Geographic Education Oklahoma Geological Survey Teachers: PASS Standards met by Destinations Oklahoma are listed on pages 15 – 17. Indian Nations of Oklahoma 1889 - Before and after the Civil War, tribal boundaries were constantly changing due to U.S. government policies. Eventually the Eastern and Western tribes merged into a state called “Oklahoma,” meaning “(land of) red people.” Oklahoma's 10 Geographic Regions - These regions refl ect both physical features (topography) and soils.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan the UNIVERSITY of OKLAHOMA
    This dissertation has been microfihned exactly as received 69-5784 DENT, Thomas Curtis, 1928- RELATIONSHIPS OF TWO ISOLATED GROUPS OF SUGAR MAPLE IN CENTRAL OKLAHOMA TO EASTERN AND WESTERN SPECIES. The University of Oklahoma, Ph.D., 1969 Botany University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE RELATIONSHIPS OF TWO ISOLATED GROUPS OF SUGAR MAPLE IN CENTRAL OKLAHOMA TO EASTERN AND WESTERN SPECIES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillm ent of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY THOMAS CURTIS DENT Norman, Oklahoma 1969 RELATIONSHIPS OF TWO ISOLATED GROUPS OF SUGAR MAPLE CENTRAL OKLAHOMA TO EASTERN AND WESTERN SPECIES APPROVED BY /^DISSERTATION COMMITTEE • • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Recognition should be made of financial support derived in part from funds provided by National Science Summer Institute Programs for Secondary School Teachers, National Science Summer Fellowship Programs for Secondary School Teachers and National Science Summer Fellowships for Graduate Teaching Assistants. Many of the staff of the Botany and Microbiology Department of The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, have contributed to this research. Particular thanks are extended to Dr. Doyle E. Anderegg, former department chairman, for making the program administratively possible and those of the committee who criticized this dissertation. Special appreciation is extended to Dr. George J. Goodman, curator of the Bebb Herbarium who has been interested in the problem of the central Oklahoma sugar maples for many years. Much contained herein reflects ideas which he developed. Gratitude is expressed for the use of fa c ilitie s at Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah and for the sampling and other favors of Or.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Ranges INSIDE on PAGE 4 OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
    VOLUME 76, NO. 4 OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2017 The Age of Oklahoma’s Mountain Ranges INSIDE ON PAGE 4 OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DR. JEREMY BOAK, Director Editor OGS geologists Neil Suneson and Ted Satterfield Thomas Stanley provide answers to the question: “How old are Oklahoma’s mountain ranges?” — Page 4 Cartography Manager James Anderson GIS Specialist Russell Standridge Copy Center Manager Richard Murray This publication, printed by the Oklahoma Geological Survey, Norman, Oklahoma, is issued by the Oklahoma Geological Survey as authorized by Title 70, Oklahoma Statutes 1981, Section 3310, and Title 74, Oklahoma Statutes 1981, Sections 231—238 The Oklahoma Geological Survey is a state agency for research and public service, mandated in the State Constitution to study Oklahoma’s land, water, mineral and energy resources and to promote wise Cover: Photo was shot on the Talimena Drive, which stretches across the Ouachita Mountains use and sound environmental practices. in southeastern Oklahoma Photo and Cover Design by Ted Satterfield 2 OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2017 Mountain ranges, a new hire, and a new year This issue focuses on a seemingly very straightforward question, one that all kinds of thought­ ful people, experts and lay people, like to ask, and ex­ pect a straightforward answer: how old are Oklahoma’s mountains? The review by Neil Suneson and Tom Stanley highlights the extent to which, even for this simple question, the answer can be quite complicated, and, in some places, the answer may still be “We don’t know.” Even for people like Neil and Tom, who have been working on Oklahoma geology for a long time and have a breadth of knowledge that we constantly call on, there are still aspects of a problem like this that can fall in the gap where they have not worked or have not yet come to a solid answer.
    [Show full text]
  • Anorthosite-Gabbro-Granophyte Relationships, Mount Sheridan Area
    RICE UNIVERSITY ANORTHOSITE-GABBRO-GRANOPHYRE RELATIONSHIPS, MOUNT SHERIDAN AREA, OKLAHOMA by EDWARD C. THORNTON A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS Thesis Director's Signature: Houston, Texas May, 1975 ABSTRACT ANORTHOSITE-GABBRO-GRANOPHYRE RELATIONSHIPS MOUNT SHERIDAN AREA, OKLAHOMA Edward C. Thornton Field work, phase analysis by microprobe, petrography, and oxygen isotope analysis have been undertaken in an ef¬ fort to establish the relationships among the anorthositic, gabbroic, and granophyric rocks of the Mount Sheridan area in southwestern Oklahoma. The gabbro has been found to be somewhat finer-grained when in contact with the anorthosite. Petrographically, the gabbro is quite different from the anorthosite. The anorthosite is essentially a one-pyroxene rock (clinopy- roxene) while the gabbro contains both augite and hyper- sthene. Quartz, micropegmatite, and biotite are present in the gabbro but essentially absent in the anorthosite. The anorthosite is a cumulate rock with well-developed igneous lamination whereas the gabbro is generally not laminated. The above information established that the anorthosite is the older unit and that the gabbro was sub¬ sequently intruded into it. The gabbro is transitional into the overlying grano- phyre through a zone of intermediate rock. The zone of transition has been found to extend into the gabbro itself as has been determined by phase analysis, in addition, diabasic inclusions are present in the granophyre - evi¬ dence of possible mixing of basaltic and granophyric magma. These observations suggest that gabbroic and granophyric magmas were emplaced simultaneously at Mount Sheridan and that the intermediate rock between the gabbro and grano¬ phyre may have been generated by mixing of the two magma types.
    [Show full text]