Quick viewing(Text Mode)

How Bogies Work Isao Okamoto

How Bogies Work Isao Okamoto

T

echnolo Railway Technology Today 5 (Edited by Kanji Wako) How Work Isao Okamoto

Role of Figure 1 and Set

Railcar bogies usually go unnoticed by rail passengers, but despite their obscurity, Wheel tread Flange they are very important in safe railway Tread operations and perform the following Wheel Axle gradient functions: • Support body firmly Wheel • Run stably on both straight and curved diameter • Ensure good ride comfort by absorbing vibration generated by track irregulari- Rail ties and minimizing impact of centri- fugal forces when runs on curves at high speed Gauge • Minimize generation of track irregulari- ties and rail abrasion To help clarify the basic mechanism of

gy bogies, this article explains bogies used affect the running performance and and some express of the Odakyu on conventional . Bogies used on strength of the bogie frame, so none are Line in suburban . Although the will be discussed in more de- used for passenger railcars in Japan today. articulated bogie has some disadvantages, tail in the next article in this series. Non-articulated and articulated bogies such as a complex structure, increased Bogies can be classified into non-articu- axle load due to the support of one body lated and articulated types according to by one bogie, and difficult maintenance, Bogie Configurations the suspension. Two non-articulated it offers various advantages including a bogies usually support one railcar body lower centre of gravity, better ride com- Types (Fig. 3a), but one articulated bogie sup- fort because car ends do not overhang Bogies are classified into the various types ports the back end of the forward car and bogies, and less effect of running noise described below according to their con- the front end of the rear car (Fig. 3b) as on passengers because seats are not over figuration in terms of the number of seen in the Spanish , French TGV, bogies. , and the design and structure of the suspension. Number of axles Since bogies run on two rails, the Figure 2 Comparison of Effect of Track Irregularity between Single-Axle Bogie and Two-Axle Bogie minimum structural requirement is an axle and two , which are usually pressed onto the axle (Fig. 1). Bogies are Smaller effect of classified into single-axle, two-axle, three- track irregularity axle, etc., based on the number of axles. on point The two-axle bogie is most common. In addition to its relatively simple structure, Car suspension point it has the advantage of decreasing the Car suspension impact of track irregularities on the rail- point car at the car suspension point, in com- parison to the single-axle bogie which transmits the impact to the car directly Single-axle bogie Two-axle bogie (Fig. 2). The three-axle bogie has a more complex structure that tends to adversely

52 Japan Railway & Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Figure 3 Non-articulated Bogie and Articulated Bogie Figure 4 Swing Hanger and Small Lateral Stiffness (a) Non-articulated cars Bolster Spring Bogies

Swing Hanger Bogie

Centre pin Non-articulated bogie Upper Side bearer swing (b) Articulated cars bolster Bogie frame Bolster anchor Bolster spring Swing Lower hanger swing bolster

Small Lateral Stiffness Bolster Spring Bogie

Articulated bogie

Centre pin

Swing hanger bogie and small lateral Bolster and bolsterless bogies Side bearer Bolster stiffness bolster spring bogie Bolster and bolsterless bogies (Fig. 7) are Bolster Air bolster Based on the structure of the suspension differentiated by their suspension gear. anchor spring Bogie gear, bogies are classified into two types: The bolster bogie was developed first. A frame the swing hanger type, and the small fundamental characteristic of the bogie is lateral stiffness bolster spring bogie type that it must rotate relative to the body on (Fig. 4). To ensure good ride comfort on curves, while retaining high rotational passenger cars, the bogie must absorb the resistance during high-speed running on reducing the number of parts and the rolling motion that passengers are most straight sections in order to prevent bogie weight (the bolsterless bogie for sensitive to. Conventional swing hanger wheelset hunting (Fig. 8) that reduces ride shinkansen was commercialized in the bogie designs support the body by using comfort. To achieve these characteristics, 1990s). In recent years, most narrow- lower swing bolster beams suspended the bolster bogie has a centre pivot that gauge and shinkansen cars use the from the bogie frame by means of a link serves as the centre of rotation, and side bolsterless bogie, which permits rotational consisting of two vertical members that bearers that resist rotation. displacement on curves through the hori- widen toward the bottom, together with In the 1980s, a bolsterless bogie was com- zontal deformation of bolster springs (also bolster springs and upper swing bolster mercialized to improve performance by known as secondary suspension springs) beams (to support vertical movement). Although the swing hanger type (Fig. 5) achieves good ride comfort by minimiz- Figure 5 Swing Hanger Bogie ing horizontal stiffness of the suspension gear, its maintenance is relatively difficult due to the complex structure and large number of wearing parts. In the 1960s, bolster bogie with air spring that absorbs vibration due to its small lateral stiffness, was developed (Fig. 6). It soon replaced the swing hanger type and was used in the first shinkansen in 1964, contributing greatly to their size and weight reduction. Most recent bogies are of the small lateral stiffness bolster spring bogie type Swing hanger because of its simplified suspension (Author) design.

Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 53 Technology

Figure 6 Lateral Stiffness Bolster Bogie

discussion focuses on the bolsterless DT50 Centre plate type (Fig. 9) which is widely used in com- muter passenger railcars of JR companies. The DT50 was first commercialized in 1985 by the former JNR when it was used Bolster Centre pivot for the Series 205 railcars.

Centre pivot wearing plate Suspension gear The suspension gear (bolster spring, trac- Bogie frame tion transfer device, anti-yawing damper, and lateral damper) plays an important role in supporting the body, allowing the bogie to rotate relative to the car body on curves, isolating the body from vibration (including high harmonics) generated by the bogie, and transmitting traction force from the bogie to the body. For these Bolster anchor purposes, the bolsterless bogie has air Wheelset Air spring under bolster springs that permit large horizontal dis- placement, as well as a traction transfer

Gears Axle spring device (classified into permanent-link type, the Z-link type and laminated- rubber type) at the virtual rotational centre of the bogie for transmitting the on both sides of the bogie. Rotation is to the car. In addition, the resisted by longitudinal anti-yawing bolsterless bogie used for express trains Figure 7 Bolster and dampers on both sides of the bogie, and shinkansen has anti-yawing dampers Bolsterless Bogies resulting in better rotational resistance (Fig. 7) at the outer side of the side beam

Bolster Bogie than conventional side bearers. of the body and bogie frame (parallel to the side beam) to prevent wheelset hunt- ing that reduces ride comfort. Basic Bogie Elements Coil springs were originally used as Air bolster bolster springs to support the body, but in spring This section describes key components the 1960s, air springs were commercial- Bolster anchor and parts of the bogie, including their ized for railcars in Japan and were used Bolster structure and performance. However, it for high-speed trains. Since the 1980s, Side bearer Bogie frame Centre pivot should be noted that the parts vary widely they have been used for commuter and according to the bogie type, and this short-distance trains in order to take Bolsterless Bogie

Figure 8 Wheelset Hunting

Traction transfer device

Air bolster spring Anti-yawing damper Bogie frame

54 Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Figure 9 DT50 Bogie for Series 205 EMU advantage of their improved ride comfort and ability to maintain body height.

Bogie frame Traction transfer device The bogie frame accommodates various Series 205 EMU (Author) bogie equipment and is generally fabri- cated by welding together two side beams Brake equipment Bolster spring and two cross beams into an H-shaped frame, (Fig. 10). In 1955, compound side Bogie frame (side beam, beams were developed using press weld- cross beam) ing and this structure is used to manufac- ture most bogie frames in Japan. The thickness of the side and cross beams was increased from 6 mm (used in some Lateral damper frames around 1960) to 9 mm. It was in- creased again to 12 mm in the 1970s, Traction motor when some bogie frames of express trains were found to have minor faults. How- ever, since the DT50, as a result of Axle and axle box simpler construction and improved weld- Axle spring, axle box suspension ing technology, bogie frames use 8 or 9 mm plates to reduce weight. Finally, (Brake disc for trailing bogie) around 1980 (1976 for shinkansen), the Wheelset material of major bogie frame members for narrow-gauge railcars was improved Gear from SS400 (rolled steel for general struc- tures) to SM400B (rolled steel for welded structures). Some bogie frames since the DT50 use Brake disc seamless steel pipes for cross beams to reduce weight and cost.

Axle box suspension Figure 10 Bogie H-Frame This device supports the axle via the bear- Cross beam ing from the bogie frame. It is a critical component determining the running per- formance of the bogie, ride comfort and bogie frame construction, due to the sus- pension method and support rigidity. Various designs are used (Fig. 11). The pedestal swing spring design supports the axle box using sliders around the pedes- tal on the bogie frame and was used widely in a variety of railcars of the former JNR. While its construction is simple, the sliders wear with time, creating play in the suspension and cause wheelset hunt- (Author) ing, so it is not suitable for high-speed op- Side beam eration. The IS type was developed for

Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 55 Technology

Figure 11 Various Axle Box Suspensions

(1) Pedestal swing spring type (2) IS type Axle box Axle box

Axle spring Cushion rubber Axle spring Sliders Cushion rubber

(3) Leaf spring type (4) Axle beam type (5) Coil spring with cylindrical laminated rubber type Axle spring Axle spring

Leaf spring Axle box Axle box Guide arm Cylindrical Cushion rubber Axle spring laminated Axle box rubber (6) Conical laminated rubber type (7) Roll rubber type

Roll rubber

Conical laminated rubber Axle box

Axle box

shinkansen and its good cushion rubber Wheels, axles and bearings have been made since 1984 to hold the stiffness effectively eliminates play Wheels of conventional railcars are a solid imbalance per wheel to below 25 kgf•cm between the axle and bogie frame. How- rolled type, and generally 860 mm in and to balance the wheels when pressing ever, it has several disadvantages, such as diameter when new. Corrugated wheels them onto the axle. increased bogie frame length and severe (Fig. 12) with a corrugated outer face have The axle is generally solid, but hollow maintenance requirements for leaf springs. been commercialized to boost rigidity, types are used for weight reduction with- As a result, recent bolsterless bogies for while reducing plate thickness and out affecting bending strength. Hollow shinkansen use other types, including the weight. They have been used for com- axles with a central void were used for coil spring with cylindrical laminated rub- muter and short-distance trains since the high-speed electric railcars and passen- ber type. Similarly, narrow-gauge railcars 1980s. The wheel tread is heat-treated ger cars in the late 1950s, but their use are increasingly using the conical lami- and has the profile shown in Fig. 13. was abandoned due to manufacturing nated rubber type, the roll rubber type Wheels are susceptible to mass imbal- problems. Around 1975, to improve (serving both as the axle box suspension ance, which causes vibration of the axle reliability, a hollow axle was developed and axle spring) and axle beam type in and wheel and is transmitted to the body, by boring a solid axle (Fig. 14). It was order to simplify construction and reduce producing uncomfortable resonance at first used in 1981 to make lighter drive manufacturing costs. certain speeds. To prevent this, efforts axles for high-speed diesel railcars

56 Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Figure 12 Corrugated Wheel operating in Hokkaido. It was later used for bolsterless bogies of shinkansen, contributing to reduced unsprung mass. Axle bearings have traditionally combined a cylindrical roller bearing (to take radial loads) and a ball bearing. Since 1965, a single sealed flanged cylindrical roller bearing (able to take both radial and thrust loads) has been used increasingly to facilitate bearing weight and size reduc- tion as well as to obtain longer periods (Author) between overhaul.

Transmission The transmission consists of gears and flexible couplings to transmit motive Figure 13 Basic Wheel Tread Profile for Narrow-Gauge JR Lines (upper) power generated by the motor or engine and Circular Arc Wheel Tread Used Widely Today (lower) to the axle. For EMUs, the nose suspen- sion device, which supports the traction Profile of wheel tread for narrow-gauge JR lines motor with the bogie frame and the axle Centre distance of wheel pair 560 (via support bearings), was used until the 60 65 1950s (Fig. 15a). The nose suspension 53 3' 20 30 15 device was large and heavy to withstand 1/10 1/20 2 vibration generated by the axle and also 2 due to the slow speed of the motor, re- 14R 15R 15R sulting in large bogie mass and unsprung mass. Around 1957, the parallel cardan driving device (Fig. 15b and c) was put 59'21" into service by mounting a smaller, high- Profile of corrected circular arc wheel tread speed motor on the bogie frame supported 125 by axle springs and transmitting the motive power to the gear via a flexible 60 65 coupling. It enabled reduction of the bogie as well as significant size 30 26.0 16 400R and weight reduction of the entire bogie, 24.85 15.5 14 and contributed greatly to the develop- 12 ment of shinkansen and conventional

express cars. 10 80R

1/100 900R

DMUs use either electrical or mechani- 320R 14R 14R 14R 27 cal transmission. While the former is used 33.86 primarily in other countries, the latter is used mostly in Japan. In this case, the 29 motive power from the engine is trans- 65' mitted via a torque converter and flexible couplings to the axle using a right angle cardan driving device (Fig. 15 d). Unit: mm

Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 57 Technology

Figure 14 Hollow Bored Axle

recently, forged steel is used for high- speed railcars to prevent disc cracking caused by frictional heating. In Japan, disc

(Author) brakes were first used on some express trains of the Odakyu Line, and they have been used primarily for trailer cars on Brake equipment causing the wheel temperature to rise to narrow-gauge lines. Nevertheless, disc The brake is used to stop at the desired critical levels. This presents a risk of brakes are costly to manufacture and position. This section focuses on cracking and makes them unsuitable for maintain, so commuter (Fig. 9 inset) and mechanical braking equipment such as high-speed operations. Disc brakes use short-distance railcars that run at relatively wheel tread brakes and disc brakes. disks at both sides of the axle or wheels; low speeds often use motor braking as a Wheel tread brakes use block-shaped at braking, the discs are clamped by brake means of halving the number of discs to brake shoes that are pushed against the pads on the calipers to impede rotation. one (reinforced type) per axle. wheel tread. Although they have a simple Traditionally, cast iron has been used for construction, they generate large amounts the disc due to its superior frictional char- Major Characteristics of Bogies of frictional heat at high running speeds, acteristics relative to the pads. However, in Recent Narrow-gauge Railcars

This section focuses on the design and key features of new bogies designed for Figure 15 Transmissions narrow-gauge lines in Japan, such as the (a) Nose suspension device bogie for commuter trains, the pendulum bogie and the bogie (used for Traction motor express trains).

Support bearing Bogies for commuter trains Since commuter or short-distance trains Wheel gear use a large number of bogies, the design must be simple to cut manufacturing Pinion costs and maintenance requirements. As Traction motor a result, bogies for recent commuter trains mostly use the bolsterless suspension Nose receiver system. As far as possible, straight side beams are used for the bogie frame and seamless pipes are used for the cross beams. Also, conical, laminated rubber, or roll rubber suspension systems are used (b) Hollow-axle parallel (c) Parallel cardan (d) Right angle cardan for the axle box and also serve as axle cardan driving device driving device driving device springs. Otherwise, the relatively simple axle beam suspension type is used. Axle K bearings are generally sealed flanged M cylindrical roller bearings. Unit brakes are M M KK used increasingly as part of the ongoing effort to reduce the number of parts, M: Traction motor thereby lengthening the service life K: Flexible coupling K K between inspection and overhaul.

Bogies for express trains Bogies for express trains have the same design concepts as bogies for commuter

58 Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Figure 16 Roller Type Tilt System

trains in terms of simple construction to cut manufacturing costs and save labour related to maintenance. However, new Tilt centre bogie designs are required to meet the demand for higher speeds, thereby cut- ting times and making trains more (Car) competitive with planes and cars. Narrow- Tilt angle,±5° gauge lines in Japan are dominated by many sections with tight curves, and travel Compressed air Bolster spring times can be reduced by increasing run- Tilt beam ning speeds on curves instead of increas- ing maximum speeds. Two types of bogies Roller have been developed to achieve this aim: Air cylinder for the tilting bogie, which increases running Bogie frame controlling tilt speed on curves without affecting ride comfort, and the steering bogie, which permits higher speeds on curves by mini- Track mizing the lateral force on the rail. They are described below. Tilting bogie When a train runs at a high speed over a curve, the generated centrifugal force tilt railcars (Series 381) were introduced with the body tilt centre. When the bogie adversely affects ride comfort by pushing in 1973 on the western section (Nagoya runs on a curve, centrifugal force acting passengers toward the outside of the to Nagano) of the Chuo Main Line. Figure on the centre of gravity causes the body curve. The tilting car has been developed 16 shows the bogie design concept. The to tilt up to 5° towards the inside of the to minimize lateral forces acting on bogie consists of a body tilting system curve. This is called the ‘roller type, natu- passengers by tilting the body toward the supporting the body on two 170-mm ral tilt system’. The Series 381 railcars inside of the curve, rather like a motor- diameter rollers and bow-shaped tilting were subsequently introduced on other cycle taking a curve. In Japan, the first beams with a centre of curvature aligned lines (Kisei and Hakubi Lines), often

Test run of roller type controlled tilt system using JR Shikoku used the controlled tilt system in its DMU Series 2000 express train (right) and EMU Series 8000 Series 381 express EMU. Car body is tilted. (Author) express train. (Author)

Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 59 Technology

contributing greatly to reduced travel times and improved riding comfort. How- Figure 17 Principles of Controlled Tilt System ever, they were not a success on sections with many frequent tight curves where body tilting was either delayed or oc- All curve data transmitted ATS ground unit from CC unit to TC unit curred too abruptly. before departure Running direction 50 m To ensure smooth tilting in these circum- X m CC Beginning of transition curve stances, the ‘controlled tilt system’ (Fig. TC TC TC Beginning of circular curve A point 17) was developed. This system incorpo- Onboard ATS unit Car tilting started rates air cylinders into the body tilting by command from TC unit CC unit: Command Controller system. An onboard controller stores data TC unit: Tilt Controller Tilting timing command Y m sent from CC unit to TC unit about all curves on the section where the Restoration of tilted car started by command from TC unit train operates, including curve radius, End of circular curve alignment, elevation, distance between End of transition curve ATS (Automatic ) ground units and starting point of transition curves, lengths of transition curves and circular curves, etc. The controller is activated by ATS ground units and controls the timing and degree of body tilting 30 to 40 Figure 18 Link-Type Forced Steering Bogie m before entering curves by referring to the stored curve data and computing the running distance to the curve using the axle revolutions from the nearest ATS Tilt beam ground unit. Car tilt control cylinder Tilt control cylinder The controlled tilt system was first intro- duced in 1989 on JR Shikoku DMU Se- ries 2000 express trains. It was soon introduced by all other JR companies due to its good reputation including ride com- Bolster anchor fort. In fact, the controlled tilt system increased Control valve running speeds over curves with a radius of 300 to 600 m from 80–110 km/h achieved by the natural tilt system to 85– Steering beam 120 km/h. In addition, the body tilting system was modified to reduce tilt resistance by using a large number of smaller bearings, in place of the conventional rollers, thereby achieving a smaller lighter bear- Axle box ing guide type tilting mechanism, which Cushion rubber is used in recent tilt cars. Steering link Steering bogie Steering lever As a train runs on a curve at high speed, Steering link Axle box the wheels exert high lateral force on the Cushion rubber rails causing wear and tear of wheel flanges and rails, and resulting in derail- ing in extreme cases. This lateral force

60 Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Figure 19 Alignment of Link-Type Forced Steering Bogie on Curved Section

Bogie frame can be reduced by various methods, including use of self-steering bogies. Steering beam (equivalent to carbody) As shown in Fig. 1, normal wheels are press-fitted onto the axle and have a tread gradient. This gradient provides some Steering lever and linkage degree of steering over a curve by allow- ing the centre of the axle to move towards the outside of the curve as a result of the centrifugal force. The steering bogie is Radius of curvature designed to make the most of this ability by reducing the stiffness of the axle box suspension and increasing the tread gradient to maximize the difference in diameter between left and right wheels on the same axle. These features allow Centre of curvature the wheels and axle to move more freely without sacrificing running stability. This concept is used in most recent bogie designs, ranging from those for commuter Figure 20 Lateral Forces of Link-Type Forced Steering Bogie and Non- trains to express trains. Nevertheless, with Steering Bogie on Rails this self-steering design, care should be Radius of curvature = 302 Cant = 105 taken to avoid excess reduction of stiff- 60 Non-steering bogie ness of the axle box suspension and ex- outside rail lateral force 50 cessive tread gradients. These concepts 10kN may be effective in reducing lateral force 40 10kN on the rail, but they can adversely affect inside rail running stability due either to small 30 Link-type forced steering bogie changes in tread gradient caused by wear 20 outside rail lateral force and tear, or to slight play in the wheel 10kN 5kN suspension, both of which risk generat- 10

Maximum lateral force (kN) 10kN inside rail -5kN ing wheelset hunting. 0 To deal with the drawbacks of the self- 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Running speed (km/h) steering bogie, the link-type forced steer- Steering bogie ing bogie has been developed (Fig. 18) Non-steering bogie Unit: mm and is currently used on JR Hokkaido Series 283 DMU express trains. The operating principle is to transmit rotation- al displacement of the bogie relative to Kanji Wako the body to the axle via a linkage, so the Mr Kanji Wako is Director in Charge of Research and Development at RTRI. He joined JNR in 1961 after graduating in axle centre line is aligned on the radius engineering from Tohoku University. He is the supervising editor for this series on Railway Technology Today. of curvature (Fig. 19). This mechanism cuts lateral force on the rail to one half or one third that of conventional bogie Isao Okamoto I designs (Fig. 20). Mr Okamoto is General Manager of the Technology Development Division of the JR Railway Technical Research Institute. He joined JNR in 1972 after obtaining a masters in mechanical engineering from the graduate school of Waseda University. He worked in the Design Office of JNR before transferring to RTRI.

Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 61