How Bogies Work Isao Okamoto

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Bogies Work Isao Okamoto T Technology echnolo Railway Technology Today 5 (Edited by Kanji Wako) How Bogies Work Isao Okamoto Role of Bogie Figure 1 Wheel and Axle Set Railcar bogies usually go unnoticed by rail passengers, but despite their obscurity, Wheel tread Flange they are very important in safe railway Tread operations and perform the following Wheel Axle gradient functions: • Support railcar body firmly Wheel • Run stably on both straight and curved diameter track • Ensure good ride comfort by absorbing vibration generated by track irregulari- Rail ties and minimizing impact of centri- fugal forces when train runs on curves at high speed Gauge • Minimize generation of track irregulari- ties and rail abrasion To help clarify the basic mechanism of gy bogies, this article explains bogies used affect the running performance and and some express trains of the Odakyu on conventional railcars. Bogies used on strength of the bogie frame, so none are Line in suburban Tokyo. Although the shinkansen will be discussed in more de- used for passenger railcars in Japan today. articulated bogie has some disadvantages, tail in the next article in this series. Non-articulated and articulated bogies such as a complex structure, increased Bogies can be classified into non-articu- axle load due to the support of one body lated and articulated types according to by one bogie, and difficult maintenance, Bogie Configurations the suspension. Two non-articulated it offers various advantages including a bogies usually support one railcar body lower centre of gravity, better ride com- Types (Fig. 3a), but one articulated bogie sup- fort because car ends do not overhang Bogies are classified into the various types ports the back end of the forward car and bogies, and less effect of running noise described below according to their con- the front end of the rear car (Fig. 3b) as on passengers because seats are not over figuration in terms of the number of seen in the Spanish Talgo, French TGV, bogies. axles, and the design and structure of the suspension. Number of axles Since bogies run on two steel rails, the Figure 2 Comparison of Effect of Track Irregularity between Single-Axle Bogie and Two-Axle Bogie minimum structural requirement is an axle and two wheels, which are usually pressed onto the axle (Fig. 1). Bogies are Smaller effect of classified into single-axle, two-axle, three- track irregularity axle, etc., based on the number of axles. on car suspension point The two-axle bogie is most common. In addition to its relatively simple structure, Car suspension point it has the advantage of decreasing the Car suspension impact of track irregularities on the rail- point car at the car suspension point, in com- parison to the single-axle bogie which transmits the impact to the car directly Single-axle bogie Two-axle bogie (Fig. 2). The three-axle bogie has a more complex structure that tends to adversely 52 Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Figure 3 Non-articulated Bogie and Articulated Bogie Figure 4 Swing Hanger and Small Lateral Stiffness (a) Non-articulated cars Bolster Spring Bogies Swing Hanger Bogie Centre pin Non-articulated bogie Upper Side bearer swing (b) Articulated cars bolster Bogie frame Bolster anchor Bolster spring Swing Lower hanger swing bolster Small Lateral Stiffness Bolster Spring Bogie Articulated bogie Centre pin Swing hanger bogie and small lateral Bolster and bolsterless bogies Side bearer Bolster stiffness bolster spring bogie Bolster and bolsterless bogies (Fig. 7) are Bolster Air bolster Based on the structure of the suspension differentiated by their suspension gear. anchor spring Bogie gear, bogies are classified into two types: The bolster bogie was developed first. A frame the swing hanger type, and the small fundamental characteristic of the bogie is lateral stiffness bolster spring bogie type that it must rotate relative to the body on (Fig. 4). To ensure good ride comfort on curves, while retaining high rotational passenger cars, the bogie must absorb the resistance during high-speed running on reducing the number of parts and the rolling motion that passengers are most straight sections in order to prevent bogie weight (the bolsterless bogie for sensitive to. Conventional swing hanger wheelset hunting (Fig. 8) that reduces ride shinkansen was commercialized in the bogie designs support the body by using comfort. To achieve these characteristics, 1990s). In recent years, most narrow- lower swing bolster beams suspended the bolster bogie has a centre pivot that gauge and shinkansen cars use the from the bogie frame by means of a link serves as the centre of rotation, and side bolsterless bogie, which permits rotational consisting of two vertical members that bearers that resist rotation. displacement on curves through the hori- widen toward the bottom, together with In the 1980s, a bolsterless bogie was com- zontal deformation of bolster springs (also bolster springs and upper swing bolster mercialized to improve performance by known as secondary suspension springs) beams (to support vertical movement). Although the swing hanger type (Fig. 5) achieves good ride comfort by minimiz- Figure 5 Swing Hanger Bogie ing horizontal stiffness of the suspension gear, its maintenance is relatively difficult due to the complex structure and large number of wearing parts. In the 1960s, bolster bogie with air spring that absorbs vibration due to its small lateral stiffness, was developed (Fig. 6). It soon replaced the swing hanger type and was used in the first shinkansen in 1964, contributing greatly to their size and weight reduction. Most recent bogies are of the small lateral stiffness bolster spring bogie type Swing hanger because of its simplified suspension (Author) design. Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 53 Technology Figure 6 Lateral Stiffness Bolster Bogie discussion focuses on the bolsterless DT50 Centre plate type (Fig. 9) which is widely used in com- muter passenger railcars of JR companies. The DT50 was first commercialized in 1985 by the former JNR when it was used Bolster Centre pivot for the Series 205 railcars. Centre pivot wearing plate Suspension gear The suspension gear (bolster spring, trac- Bogie frame tion transfer device, anti-yawing damper, and lateral damper) plays an important role in supporting the body, allowing the bogie to rotate relative to the car body on curves, isolating the body from vibration (including high harmonics) generated by the bogie, and transmitting traction force from the bogie to the body. For these Bolster anchor purposes, the bolsterless bogie has air Wheelset Traction motor Air spring under bolster springs that permit large horizontal dis- placement, as well as a traction transfer Gears Axle spring device (classified into permanent-link type, the Z-link type and laminated- rubber type) at the virtual rotational centre of the bogie for transmitting the on both sides of the bogie. Rotation is tractive force to the car. In addition, the resisted by longitudinal anti-yawing bolsterless bogie used for express trains Figure 7 Bolster and dampers on both sides of the bogie, and shinkansen has anti-yawing dampers Bolsterless Bogies resulting in better rotational resistance (Fig. 7) at the outer side of the side beam Bolster Bogie than conventional side bearers. of the body and bogie frame (parallel to the side beam) to prevent wheelset hunt- ing that reduces ride comfort. Basic Bogie Elements Coil springs were originally used as Air bolster bolster springs to support the body, but in spring This section describes key components the 1960s, air springs were commercial- Bolster anchor and parts of the bogie, including their ized for railcars in Japan and were used Bolster structure and performance. However, it for high-speed trains. Since the 1980s, Side bearer Bogie frame Centre pivot should be noted that the parts vary widely they have been used for commuter and according to the bogie type, and this short-distance trains in order to take Bolsterless Bogie Figure 8 Wheelset Hunting Traction transfer device Air bolster spring Anti-yawing damper Bogie frame 54 Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Figure 9 DT50 Bogie for Series 205 EMU advantage of their improved ride comfort and ability to maintain body height. Bogie frame Traction transfer device The bogie frame accommodates various Series 205 EMU (Author) bogie equipment and is generally fabri- cated by welding together two side beams Brake equipment Bolster spring and two cross beams into an H-shaped frame, (Fig. 10). In 1955, compound side Bogie frame (side beam, beams were developed using press weld- cross beam) ing and this structure is used to manufac- ture most bogie frames in Japan. The thickness of the side and cross beams was increased from 6 mm (used in some Lateral damper frames around 1960) to 9 mm. It was in- creased again to 12 mm in the 1970s, Traction motor when some bogie frames of express trains were found to have minor faults. How- ever, since the DT50, as a result of Axle bearing and axle box simpler construction and improved weld- Axle spring, axle box suspension ing technology, bogie frames use 8 or 9 mm plates to reduce weight. Finally, (Brake disc for trailing bogie) around 1980 (1976 for shinkansen), the Wheelset material of major bogie frame members for narrow-gauge railcars was improved Gear from SS400 (rolled steel for general struc- tures) to SM400B (rolled steel for welded structures). Some bogie frames since the DT50 use Brake disc seamless steel pipes for cross beams to reduce weight and cost. Axle box suspension Figure 10 Bogie H-Frame This device supports the axle via the bear- Cross beam ing from the bogie frame. It is a critical component determining the running per- formance of the bogie, ride comfort and bogie frame construction, due to the sus- pension method and support rigidity.
Recommended publications
  • Assessing Steam Locomotive Dynamics and Running Safety by Computer Simulation
    TRANSPORT PROBLEMS 2015 PROBLEMY TRANSPORTU Volume 10 Special Edition steam locomotive; balancing; reciprocating; hammer blow; rolling stock and track interaction Dāvis BUŠS Institute of Transportation, Riga Technical University Indriķa iela 8a, Rīga, LV-1004, Latvia Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ASSESSING STEAM LOCOMOTIVE DYNAMICS AND RUNNING SAFETY BY COMPUTER SIMULATION Summary. Steam locomotives are preserved on heritage railways and also occasionally used on mainline heritage trips, but since they are only partially balanced reciprocating piston engines, damage is made to the railway track by dynamic impact, also known as hammer blow. While causing a faster deterioration to the track on heritage railways, the steam locomotive may also cause deterioration to busy mainline tracks or tracks used by high speed trains. This raises the question whether heritage operations on mainline can be done safely and without influencing the operation of the railways. If the details of the dynamic interaction of the steam locomotive's components are examined with computerised calculations they show differences with the previous theories as the smaller components cannot be disregarded in some vibration modes. A particular narrow gauge steam locomotive Gr-319 was analyzed and it was found, that the locomotive exhibits large dynamic forces on the track, much larger than those given by design data, and the safety of the ride is impaired. Large unbalanced vibrations were found, affecting not only the fatigue resistance of the locomotive, but also influencing the crew and passengers in the train consist. Developed model and simulations were used to check several possible parameter variations of the locomotive, but the problems were found to be in the original design such that no serious improvements can be done in the space available for the running gear and therefore the running speed of the locomotive should be limited to reduce its impact upon the track.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Body and Bogie Connection Modification for Track Curves Passability Improvement
    MATEC Web of Conferences 157, 03009 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815703009 MMS 2017 Car body and bogie connection modification for track curves passability improvement Vladimír Hauser1,*, la . Nozhenko1, Kara Kravchenko1, Mária Loulová1, Juraj Gerlici1, Tomáš Lack1 1University of Ţilina, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Transport and Handling Machines, Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Ţilina, Slovak Republic Abstract. For Tram cars, it is often necessary to operate in cities on strongly curved track, which is followed by an increased effect of the vehicle on the track. Especially, this increased effect occurs in spiral transition curves situated between direct and arc sections or between two arc sections of different radius. In such case, increased guiding forces, creep in the rail - wheel contact, wear and noise generation can be observed. Exactly with the aim to reduce these undesirable effects we designed a tram bogie with steered wheelsets. This paper deals with a modification of its coupling to vehicle body in order to improve vehicle dynamics in transition curves. Proposed innovative construction of this coupling unit is registered by authors under Utility Model Nr. u201609015 and Utility Model Nr. u201703246. Description of the proposed way for a vehicle to pass through curved track with regard to bogie-body coupling and wheelset steering mechanisms with usage of multibody computing software is given in this paper. Keywords: bogie to vehicle body coupling, track transition curves, tramcar throughput improvement 1 Introduction The way a vehicle passes a track arc depends on many factors. The most important of these include the bogie wheelbase, the distance of pivot pins, the way the car body is mounted on the bogie, the design of the wheelset guiding in the bogie, the track gauge and the width of the track free channel with which the geometry of the wheel and rail profiles is directly related.
    [Show full text]
  • Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)
    Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Steam Locomotive, 1803 to 1898 (1899)
    > g s J> ° "^ Q as : F7 lA-dh-**^) THE EVOLUTION OF THE STEAM LOCOMOTIVE (1803 to 1898.) BY Q. A. SEKON, Editor of the "Railway Magazine" and "Hallway Year Book, Author of "A History of the Great Western Railway," *•., 4*. SECOND EDITION (Enlarged). £on&on THE RAILWAY PUBLISHING CO., Ltd., 79 and 80, Temple Chambers, Temple Avenue, E.C. 1899. T3 in PKEFACE TO SECOND EDITION. When, ten days ago, the first copy of the " Evolution of the Steam Locomotive" was ready for sale, I did not expect to be called upon to write a preface for a new edition before 240 hours had expired. The author cannot but be gratified to know that the whole of the extremely large first edition was exhausted practically upon publication, and since many would-be readers are still unsupplied, the demand for another edition is pressing. Under these circumstances but slight modifications have been made in the original text, although additional particulars and illustrations have been inserted in the new edition. The new matter relates to the locomotives of the North Staffordshire, London., Tilbury, and Southend, Great Western, and London and North Western Railways. I sincerely thank the many correspondents who, in the few days that have elapsed since the publication: of the "Evolution of the , Steam Locomotive," have so readily assured me of - their hearty appreciation of the book. rj .;! G. A. SEKON. -! January, 1899. PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION. In connection with the marvellous growth of our railway system there is nothing of so paramount importance and interest as the evolution of the locomotive steam engine.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen-Rail (Hydrail) Development
    H2@Rail Workshop Hydrogen-Rail (hydrail) Development Andreas Hoffrichter, PhD Burkhardt Professor in Railway Management Executive Director of the Center for Railway Research and Education [email protected] H2@Rail Workshop, Lansing, MI March 27, 2019 Contents • Current rail energy consumption and emissions • Hybrids • Primary power plant efficiencies • Hydrail development • Past and on-going research - 2 - Michigan State University, 2019 Current Rail Energy Efficiency and GHG DOT (2018), ORNL (2018) - 3 - Michigan State University, 2019 Regulated Exhaust Emissions • The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has regulated the exhaust emissions from locomotives • Four different tiers, depending on construction year of locomotive • Increasingly stringent emission reduction requirements • Tier 5 is now in discussion (see next slide) • Achieving Tier 4 was already very challenging for manufacturers (EPA, 2016) - 4 - Michigan State University, 2019 Proposed Tier 5 Emission Regulation • California proposed rail emission regulation to be adopted at the federal level (California Air Resources Board, 2017) - 5 - Michigan State University, 2019 Class I Railroad Fuel Cost 2016 (AAR, 2017) • Interest from railways in alternatives high when diesel cost high, interest low when diesel cost low • When diesel cost are high, often fuel surcharges introduced to shippers • Average railroad diesel price for the last 10 years ~US$2.50 per gallon (AAR, 2017) - 6 - Michigan State University, 2019 Dynamic Braking • Traction motors are used as generators • Generated electricity is: – Converted to heat in resistors, called rheostatic braking – Fed back into wayside infrastructure or stored on-board of train, called regenerative braking • Reduces brake shoe/pad wear, e.g., replacement every 18 month rather than every18 days (UK commuter train example) • Can reduces energy consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Rail & Preserving the Environment
    Freight Rail & Preserving the Environment Preserving the environment and addressing climate change is a responsibility railroads take seriously. As a backbone of the U.S. economy for the last two centuries, freight railroads have evolved to provide efficient and advanced transportation solutions to American businesses and consumers. Today’s railroads continue to modernize their operations to meet tomorrow’s challenges, including improvements that increase efficiency and benefit the environment. • Less Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Greenhouse gas emissions are directly related to fuel consumption. Freight railroads account for just 0.5% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, according to EPA data, and just 1.9% of transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions. • More Fuel Efficient: Freight rail is ahead of other land modes of surface transportation when it comes to limiting its carbon footprint. U.S. freight railroads, on average, move one ton of freight more than 480 miles per gallon of fuel. • Sustainable Choice: AAR analysis of federal data finds: If 25% of the truck traffic moving at least 750 miles went by rail instead, annual greenhouse gas emissions would fall by approximately 13.1 million tons; If 50% of the truck traffic moving at least 750 miles went by rail instead, greenhouse gas emissions would fall by approximately 26.2 million tons. • Holistic Approach: From advanced locomotive technology to zero-emission cranes, freight railroads leverage technology across their operations to limit their impact on the environment. In 2020 alone, U.S. freight railroads consumed 675 million fewer gallons of fuel and emitted 7.6 million fewer tons of carbon dioxide than they would have if their fuel efficiency had remained constant since 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • O-Steam-Price-List-Mar2017.Pdf
    Part # Description Package Price ======== ================================================== ========= ========== O SCALE STEAM CATALOG PARTS LIST 2 Springs, driver leaf........................ Pkg. 2 $6.25 3 Floor, cab and wood grained deck............. Ea. $14.50 4 Beam, end, front pilot w/coupler pocket...... Ea. $8.00 5 Beam, end, rear pilot w/carry iron.......... Ea. $8.00 6 Bearings, valve rocker....................... Pkg.2 $6.50 8 Coupler pockets, 3-level, for link & pin..... Pkg. 2 $5.75 9 Backhead w/fire door base.................... Ea. $9.00 10 Fire door, working........................... Ea. $7.75 11 Journal, 3/32" bore.......................... Pkg. 4. $5.75 12 Coupler pockets, small, S.F. Street Railway.. Pkg.2 $5.25 13 Brakes, engine............................... Pkg.2 $7.00 14 Smokebox, 22"OD, w/working door.............. Ea. $13.00 15 Drawbar, rear link & pin..................... Ea. $5.00 16 Handles, firedoor............................ Pkg.2. $5.00 17 Shelf, oil can, backhead..................... Ea. $5.75 18 Gauge, backhead, steam pressure.............. Ea. $5.50 19 Lubricator, triple-feed, w/bracket, Seibert.. Ea. $7.50 20 Tri-cock drain w/3 valves, backhead.......... Ea. $5.75 21 Tri-cock valves, backhead, (pl. 48461)....... Pkg. 3 $5.50 23 Throttle, nonworking......................... Ea. $6.75 23.1 Throttle, non working, plastic............... Ea. $5.50 24 Pop-off, pressure, spring & arm.............. Ea. $6.00 25 Levers, reverse/brake, working............... Kit. $7.50 26 Tri-cock drain, less valves.................. Ea. $5.75 27 Seat boxes w/backs........................... Pkg.2 $7.50 28 Injector w/piping, Penberthy,................ Pkg.2 $6.75 29 Oiler, small hand, N/S....................... Pkg.2 $6.00 32 Retainers, journal........................... Pkg.
    [Show full text]
  • Fox Lake to Chicago – Saturday Fox Lake to Chicago – Sunday* METRA MILWAUKEE Many Buses Board at the Union Station Available on Weekends and Selected Holidays
    g y CONNECTING SERVICES TICKET INFORMATION CONTINUED Fox Lake to Chicago – Saturday Fox Lake to Chicago – Sunday* METRA MILWAUKEE Many buses board at the Union Station Available on weekends and selected holidays. 2600 2602 2604 2606 2608 2610 2612 2614 2616 2618 2620 2622 2600 2602 2604 2606 2608 2612 2614 2616 2620 2622 DISTRICT NORTH LINE TCrTaAn sCit oCnennetcetri on sJ:a ckson, including popular routes to Navy C Fahmildirlye nF argees 1 —1 and under ride when accompanied by a ZON E ST ATIONS AM AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM ST A TI ON S AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM )<@ Pier, North Michigan Avenue and Illinois Center. fare paying adult (up to three chiflrdere en free per adult). J FOX LAKE LV : 5:38 6:45 8:4 5 9:45 10:45 11:4 5 12:45 2:45 4:45 — 8:25 10:25 FOX LA KE LV : 5:38 6:45 8:45 9:45 10:4 5 12:45 2:45 4:45 8:2 5 10:25 • DOWNLOAD SCHEDULES Board CTA Blue Line trains at the Clinton/Congress subway • J Ingleside f5:41 f6:48 f8:4 8 — f10:48 — f12:48 f2:48 f4:4 8 — f8:28 f10:28 Ingl esid e f5:4 1 f6:4 8 f8:4 8 — f10:48 f12:48 f2:4 8 f4:4 8 f8:28 f10:28 ;0*2,;: station, two blocks south of Union Station. Board CTA Brown, — Full time students enrolled in an accredited J Lo ng L ak e 5:44 6:51 8:5 1 — f10:51 — f12:51 f2:51 f4:5 1 — 8:31 10:31 Long L ak e 5:44 6:51 8:51 — f10:51 f12:51 f2:5 1 f4:5 1 8:3 1 10:31 NOWNOW Chicago to Orange, Purple, and Pink Line trains at the Quincy/Wells gSrtauddee sncth Foaorl eos r high school can purchase a reduced One-Way, ° I Roun d La ke 5:47 6:54 8:5 4 9:52 10:54 11:5 2 12:54 2:54 4:54 — 8:34 10:34 Ro un d La ke 5:47 6:54 8:54 9:52 10:5 4 12:54 2:54 4:54 8:3 4 10:34 90./; Elevated Station, three blocks east of Union Station.
    [Show full text]
  • CITYLINK TRAM TRAIN South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE), Sheffield, UK
    CITYLINK TRAM TRAIN South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE), Sheffield, UK South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE) ordered seven tram trains of the Citylink type in June 2013 for use on the first tram-train system in the UK, to operate on the Supertram tram network and on the national rail network between the cities of Sheffield and Rotherham. The bidirectional light rail vehicles cover tramway applications and full train regional operations at 100 km/h and have been adapted to the particularities of the tram and rail network in the county of South Yorkshire. The dual-voltage vehicles meet British standards and are able to operate under 750 V DC overhead voltage (tram network) and 25 kV AC overhead voltage (railway network) and to work on tracks with a maximum gradient of 10%. Citylink is a modular, barrier-free and low-floor light rail vehicle family specially designed to provide a safe and highly comfortable ride. www.stadlerrail.com Stadler Rail Group Stadler Rail Valencia S.A. Ernst-Stadler-Strasse 1 Pol. Ind. Mediterráneo. Mitjera 6 CH-9565 Bussnang E-46550 Albuixech (Valencia) Phone +41 71 626 21 20 Phone +34 96 141 50 00 [email protected] [email protected] Technical features Vehicle data Technology – Bidirectional light rail vehicle Customer South Yorkshire Passenger – Certified according to British standards Transport Executive (SYPTE) – Nominal current supply: 750 V DC and 25 kV AC Region Sheffield, – 3 motor bogies/1 trailer bogie South Yorkshire County, UK – Able to operate
    [Show full text]
  • KCK, Leavenworth Connected by Train
    The Kansas City, Kansan, October 6, 1985: p 7A KCK, Leavenworth connected by train This 1914 picture (advertisement) offers a trip to Leavenworth on the trolley, "Along the line of the K.C.W. (Editor's note: This is the 26th in a series of "then Ry." The line operated from 1900 to 1938, succumbing to financial woes. and now" articles on places and things of interest in Kansas City, Kan., compiled by area historian Margaret Landis in observance of the 100th birthday of KCK in 1986. Much of the information has appeared in past editions of The Kansan.) (Transcriptions are presented without changes except to improve readability.) An interurban electric railway -- passing "through rather hilly country presenting very picturesque and varied scenery near the Missouri River" -- operated from 1900 to 1938 from Kansas City, Kan., to Leavenworth, Kan. Chartered cars were available for groups on trips for special celebrations, musical or athletic events or political rallies at Kansas City or Leavenworth. At the national Soldiers Home in Wadsworth and at Shrine Park, there were band concerts and picnics. Other points of interest along the line were Fort Leavenworth, the Command and General College, the Federal Penitentiary, Kansas State Penitentiary at Lansing and St. Mary's Academy. There were the daily commuters (job holders) who rode the trolley back and forth to work and the women shoppers from the farms and small towns going to the larger cities. Pioneer Electric Interurban The pioneer electric interurban railway in Kansas was chartered July 28, 1897 as the Kansas City and Leavenworth Traction Company to operate in Leavenworth and Wyandotte counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Sheet Bogies-SF
    SF 500 Bogies for high-speed trains The SF 500 bogies are a further Excellent ride quality is achieved in the Suspension is designed taking running development of the SGP 400 bogies, secondary suspension system by the stability and acoustic requirements 950 of which are in use on the ICE2 of high-tech air suspension system and into consideration. the Deutsche Bahn AG. They are the provision of large air volume. Redundant-type hydraulic yaw designed for electric railcar trains and The pivot, the yoke and the two dampers are used to stabilise running modern high-speed trains and provide traction rods are proven designs and behaviour at high speeds. optimum ride quality. similar to the con-cept of the ICE2. The trailer bogies are equipped with a Orders have been received from the Torque transmission from the lateral mechanical disc brake system with Deutsche Bahn AG, the Netherlands traction motor is achieved by a 2, 3 or 4 discs per axle and a non-wear Railways, the RENFE and many other partially suspended, low-noise gear eddy-current brake. On the motor operators for more than 6500 bogies. per axle together with spiral-toothed bogie, wheel disc brakes are used. The modular design means that the coupling. SF 500 bogie can be designed both as Bogie traction motors are flexibly motor bogies and as trailer bogies and suspended in the bogie by a motor can be fitted beneath carbodies with support structure and an innovative or without bolster. laminated spring damper system. Bogie weight is significantly lower than that of comparable bogies due to the use of light-weight components.
    [Show full text]
  • Staten Island Railway Railway Timetable
    Effective Winter 2016 – 2017 MTA Staten Island Railway Railway Timetable ✪ NEW: ARTHUR KILL STATION MetroCard® may be purchased at vending machines located at St George terminal and at Tompkinsville station, and is accepted for both entering and leaving the railway at both locations as well. Now more than ever – MTA Staten Island Railway for speed and reliability Reduced-Fare Benefits – If you qualify for reduced fare, you can travel for half fare. You are eligible for reduced-fare benefit if you are at least 65 years of age or have a qualifying disability with proper identification. Benefits are available (except on peak-hour express buses) with proper identification, including Reduced-Fare MetroCard or Medicare card (Medicaid cards do not qualify). Children – The subway, SIR, local, Limited-Stop, and +SelectBusService buses permit up to three children, 44 inches tall and under, to ride free when accompanied by an adult paying full-fare. Express buses permit one child, two years old and under, to ride free when carried in the lap of a fare-paying adult. Holiday Service – On Martin Luther King Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Election Day, and the Day after Thanksgiving, SIR operates a Weekday Schedule. When New Years Day, Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day are celebrated Tuesday through Friday, SIR operates a Saturday Schedule; however, if these holidays are celebrated on Saturday, Sunday or Monday, SIR operates a Sunday Schedule. SIR will operate early departure “get-a-way” schedules on the evening before select holidays. Please refer to Service Information posters for details.
    [Show full text]