DOCSLIB.ORG

The Significance of the Avant-Garde for Contemporary Aesthetics: a Reply to Jürgen Habermas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Significance of the Avant-Garde for Contemporary Aesthetics: a Reply to Jürgen Habermas The Significance of the Avant-Garde for Contemporary Aesthetics: A Reply to Jürgen Habermas Author(s): Peter Bürger, Andreas Huyssen and Jack Zipes Source: New German Critique, No. 22, Special Issue on Modernism (Winter, 1981), pp. 19-22 Published by: New German Critique Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/487861 . Accessed: 14/01/2014 13:22 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. New German Critique and Duke University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to New German Critique. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.59.129.186 on Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:22:26 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The Significanceof theAvant-Garde for ContemporaryAesthetics: A Reply to JiirgenHabermas by Peter Biirger Ever since the appearance of his firstbooks publishedduring the early 1960s, JiirgenHabermas has devoted his effortsmore thanany othercon- temporary philosopher toward making the traditionof the European Enlightenmentfruitful for the thoughtand practice of the present. In Strukturwandelder Offentlichkeit*he uncoveredthe socio-historicalcondi- tions which contributedto the decay of that major politicalcategory of bourgeois society.Then in Theorieund Praxis**he examinedthe changing relationship between science and social action. In both works he was concerned with locating the possibilitiesand limitationsin regard to a contemporarycontinuation of the project of the Enlightenmentwhich Kant had described with the concept Miindigkeit,the coming of age. Throughouthis studiesHabermas has never lost sightof the factthat the effortsto salvage the hopes of the Enlightenmentcan only be successful today to the extentthat these endeavors include a critiqueof bourgeois society. It has always been self-evidentfor Habermas thatMarx's analysis of capitalismmust not only be taken into consideration,but mustalso be checked and correctedin lightof historicalexperience since theend of the 19thcentury.' Habermas's speech "Modernity versus Postmodernity,"which was given in Frankfurtwhen he was awarded theAdorno prize,2testifies to the continuityof his thought. He takes a decisive stand to maintain the "project of modernity,"and he is just as decisive in his oppositionto the coalition of various typesof conservatismwhich he examineswith timely diagnostic precision. Withinthis frameworkhe develops his culturaland * The StructuralTransformation of the Public Sphere (1962). Not availablein English. For a summarysee JiurgenHabermas, "The PublicSphere," New German Critique. 3 (Fall 1974),49-55. ** Theoryand Practice(1963). 1. The factthat I mustexplicitly stress this point to counter subtle and not so subtleattacks in WestGermany on Habermas'salleged dogmatism is itselfa commentaryon "academic freedom"in thatcountry. 2. See "Die Modemrne:Ein unvollendetesProject," Die Zeit,Nr. 39, (American edition Nr. 39, September26, 1980). 19 This content downloaded from 128.59.129.186 on Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:22:26 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 20 Biurger theoreticalreflections which point to a wayout of the increasingesotericism of art (Esoterisierungder Kunst),and he elaborateswhat a non-specialized reception of art would look like. I should like to discuss Habermas's Frankfurtthesis in a criticalway, but I want to make it clear thatI am in basic agreementwith the social and scientificgoals whichhe has formu- lated. I am also consciousof the extentto whichmy own workis indebted to Habermas. Stimulated by his re-examinationof Max Weber's works Habermas sees the developmentof the modernage as "the differentiation(Ausdif- ferenzierung)of the value spheresof science, morality,and art," and he characterizesthe project of modernityas the endeavor to develop the spheres "in theirrespective inherent logic" (Eigensinn)while at thesame time using theirpotential "for a reasonable (verniinftig)organization of everydaylife." In thisway he can emphasizethe continuityof his cultural and theoretical reflectionswith the modernistproject by stressingthe necessityof a specialized elaborationof artisticproblems while at thesame time envisioninga type of receptionwhich "uses" aestheticexperience "explorativelyfor the illuminationof a life-historicalsituation." Habermas's argumentis quite convincingand consistentwith his thoughtto the extent that it suggestsan outline for overcomingthe aporias of contemporary culture, an outline derived preciselyfrom the traditionof the European modernizationprocess. However, I ask myselfwhether this consistency of argumentdoes not demand too higha prize: thesmoothing out of ruptures in the developmentof culture. Ruptures,after all, can be key pointsof knowledgebecause theyreveal the contradictionsof culture.I should like to summarizemy ideas in the followingthree paragraphs. 1. I am not certainwhether one can talk about a paralleldevelopment of the three"spheres" (science, morality,and art) as Habermasdoes when he posits sublation claims (Aufhebungsansprciche)in the spheresof the- oretical knowledgeand moralitywhich would parallel the sublationclaim of the avant-garde.Habermas neglectsthe fact that there are structural differencesbetween the respectivespheres and thatthe spheres themselves differin socialstatus. While autonomous art carries with it theidea of its self-transcendencethis cannot be said to be true of science in the same way. And morality,contrary to autonomous art, has always claimed to guide human practice.This then focusesattention on what the Weberian differentiationmodel conceals: the differentimpact potential of the separate spheres and theirinterdependence. Here it seems to me thatthe primacyof science visa vis theother two realmsis a centralproblem within the social modernizationprocess. When autonomousart constituteditself at the end of the 18thcentury, this was also an attemptto counterthe advance of empiricalscientific processes in the treatmentof nature. 2. Both sides of what Habermas calls the project of modernity(the developmentof the separate spheresaccording to theirown logic and the use of theirpotential for a reasonable organizationof everydaylife) have This content downloaded from 128.59.129.186 on Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:22:26 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Avant-gardeand ContemporaryAestletics 21 manifestedthemselves, at leastin therealm of literature,not as partsof a uniformproject but ratheras a historicalmovement of conflictingand antagonistictendencies. Against courtly divertissement and theculture of representationthe Enlightenment developed a conceptof literature which declaredthe reasonableorganization of everydaylife as its goal. The notionof practicaluse becamethe guiding principle of literary production and reception.It was underconditions of decisively new historical experi- ences- theloss of validity of religiousworld views, the fragmentation of humanactivities, and thediscernment of thenegative consequences of a rapidlyexpanding profit-oriented book market- that art constituted itselfas autonomousat theend of the 18th century. There was an insistence on theinternal logic (Eigensinn) of the artistic sphere which from that time on rejectedthe Enlightenment's aesthetics of impactby sharply opposing thenotion that art had to fulfill practical needs of everyday life.3 Ever since theaesthetics of autonomywas institutionalized,attempts to linkup with the Enlightenment'sconcept of literatureand to includecognitive and moralquestions in arthave been foughtby writers and critics(examples would be the rejectionof Zola's naturalismand of Sartre'slittirature engagde).Only in the fieldof commercialand popularliterature is a receptionfrom the perspectiveof individuallife historyallowed and therebyimplicitly denigrated. In fullydeveloped bourgeois society "auton- omy"and "use" of arthave increasingly come to opposeeach other, they will not be so easilyreconciled as Habermas'construction of modernity suggests. 3. Habermasis correctin arguing that late 19-century aestheticism holds a keyposition for an understandingofthe development of art in bourgeois society.The processtoward ever more radical autonomy reaches its high pointin aestheticismwhere the demand for autonomy becomes effective and manifeston thelevel of artistic content. But this means - andhere I disagreewith Habermas - thatthe developmentof artaccording to its internallogic gives rise to a problem:the danger of a semanticatrophy of the works.The avant-garde'srevolt responds to aestheticism'sradical claim forautonomy with an attemptwhich is no less radical.It is the attemptto sublatethe autonomyclaims and to reintegrateart intothe practiceof everydaylife. Habermasuses the terms"modernity" and "avant-garde"as syno- nyms,following Adorno's usage. This terminology,however, veils the historicalachievements of the avant-gardemovements. Insofar as they producedworks which are recognizedtoday, they are integratedinto the movementof modernity.But theirradical demand to reintegrateart into everydaylife is rejectedas a falsesublation. Here Habermasis just as 3. See Aufkliirungund literarische Offentlichkeit, ed. by Christa
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nietzsche and Aestheticism
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1992 Nietzsche and Aestheticism Brian Leiter Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Brian Leiter, "Nietzsche and Aestheticism," 30 Journal of the History of Philosophy 275 (1992). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Notes and Discussions Nietzsche and Aestheticism 1o Alexander Nehamas's Nietzsche: L~fe as Literature' has enjoyed an enthusiastic reception since its publication in 1985 . Reviewed in a wide array of scholarly journals and even in the popular press, the book has won praise nearly everywhere and has already earned for Nehamas--at least in the intellectual community at large--the reputation as the preeminent American Nietzsche scholar. At least two features of the book may help explain this phenomenon. First, Nehamas's Nietzsche is an imaginative synthesis of several important currents in recent Nietzsche commentary, reflecting the influence of writers like Jacques Der- rida, Sarah Kofman, Paul De Man, and Richard Rorty. These authors figure, often by name, throughout Nehamas's book; and it is perhaps Nehamas's most important achievement to have offered a reading of Nietzsche that incorporates the insights of these writers while surpassing them all in the philosophical ingenuity with which this style of interpreting Nietzsche is developed. The high profile that many of these thinkers now enjoy on the intellectual landscape accounts in part for the reception accorded the "Nietzsche" they so deeply influenced.
    [Show full text]
  • Art for Art's Sake: a Literary Luxury Or a Contemporaneous Need?
    International Journal of Language and Literature December 2018, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 182-187 ISSN: 2334-234X (Print), 2334-2358 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/ijll.v6n2a27 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v6n2a27 Art for Art’s Sake: A Literary Luxury or a Contemporaneous Need? Dr. Mohamad Haj Mohamad1 & Dr. Nadia Hamendi2 Abstract The dichotomy of art for art‘s sake and art for society‘s sake became a pressing concern in the Victorian period due to the pressure from government to use art as a means for championing its causes and aspirations, leaving artists feeling the need to redefine the identity and objectives of art. Believing in art as serving the creation only of beauty for its own sake led to the emergence and rise of art for art‘s sake, a movement that felt that art stripped of its true aesthetical values would suffer as a result. Art for art's sake is an assertion of the value of art away from any moral or didactic objectives, a process that adds a mask of luxury to literature. This paper traces the movement of art for art‘s sake, looking at its main figures from across Europe. It poses the question of whether art is supposed to moralize and teach or devote itself to the creation and championing of the cause of beauty and idealism. Believing that art had declined in an era of utility and rationalism, rebellion against Victorian middle class moral standards was unavoidable.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubo-Futurism
    Notes Cubo-Futurism Slap in theFace of Public Taste 1 . These two paragraphs are a caustic attack on the Symbolist movement in general, a frequent target of the Futurists, and on two of its representatives in particular: Konstantin Bal'mont (1867-1943), a poetwho enjoyed enormouspopu­ larityin Russia during thefirst decade of this century, was subsequentlyforgo tten, and died as an emigrein Paris;Valerii Briusov(18 73-1924), poetand scholar,leader of the Symbolist movement, editor of the Salles and literary editor of Russum Thought, who after the Revolution joined the Communist party and worked at Narkompros. 2. Leonid Andreev (1871-1919), a writer of short stories and a playwright, started in a realistic vein following Chekhov and Gorkii; later he displayed an interest in metaphysicsand a leaning toward Symbolism. He is at his bestin a few stories written in a realistic manner; his Symbolist works are pretentious and unconvincing. The use of the plural here implies that, in the Futurists' eyes, Andreev is just one of the numerousepigones. 3. Several disparate poets and prose writers are randomly assembled here, which stresses the radical positionof the signatories ofthis manifesto, who reject indiscriminately aU the literaturewritt en before them. The useof the plural, as in the previous paragraphs, is demeaning. Maksim Gorkii (pseud. of Aleksei Pesh­ kov, 1�1936), Aleksandr Kuprin (1870-1938), and Ivan Bunin (1870-1953) are writers of realist orientation, although there are substantial differences in their philosophical outlook, realistic style, and literary value. Bunin was the first Rus­ sianwriter to wina NobelPrize, in 1933.AJeksandr Biok (1880-1921)is possiblythe best, and certainlythe most popular, Symbolist poet.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbolism and Aestheticism
    CHAPTER 18 Symbolism and Aestheticism 1 Decadent Aesthetics and Literature Kant ’s aesthetics, the romantic conception of poetry, Schopenhauer ’s pessi- mism and Nietzsche ’s irrationalism exerted a strong influence on the modern concept of art, poetry and the function of the literary work. Boosted by these philosophical ideas and by the explosive growth of literary and figurative pro- duction, the second part of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries ushered in a great transformation in the idea of literature and art. During this time there appeared some of the pivotal and most influential liter- ary works. Charles Baudelaire ’s first edition of The Flowers of Evil was published in 1857; Arthur Rimbaud ’s A Season in Hell was published in 1873; and 1922 saw the completion or publication of Rainer Maria Rilke ’s Sonnets to Orpheus and The Duino Elegies, James Joyce ’s Ulysses, Paul Valéry ’s The Graveyard by the Sea and the bulk of Marcel Proust ’s Remembrance of Things Past, only to mention some decisive works among many others. This literary and cultural period which roughly stretches from Baudelaire to Valéry is called “Decadence .” Symbolism and aestheticism are characteristic trends or attitudes of the Decadence. These are nothing but approximate terms and sometimes useful labels which neither encompass all poets who were active in that period nor explain the individual particularity of most poems. Neverthe- less, in the authors of this period we can find many works sharing certain com- mon features. We can consider the Decadence as the extreme development of romanticism and its last manifestation.1 Actually many tenets of romantic lore about art and poetry2 are accepted and stressed in decadent poems.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGL 86000. “Aestheticism, Decadence, Modernism, 1880-‐1930.” Professor Richard Kaye
    ENGL 86000. “Aestheticism, Decadence, Modernism, 1880-1930.” Professor Richard Kaye This class explores the relation between the aestheticist and decadent movements and their crucial determination of modernist aesthetics. Beginning with the fin de siècle, we will consider works by Hardy, Wilde, James, and Huysmans. The late- Victorian period was a time of pervasive fears and fantasies dominated by such figures as the New Woman, the urban detective, the homosexual bachelor, the Anarchist, the Oriental, the overreaching colonialist, the self-preening aesthete, the vampire, and the femme fatale. In the diverse writings of Pater, Olive Schreiner, Vernon Lee, Symonds, and Wilde, aestheticism emerged as a theoretically coherent and varied movement absorbed in exquisite surfaces and useless artifice. For decadent writers and artists, scientific theories of “degeneration” could be recalibrated as erotically charged, non-teleological experiments, while Freud drew on “decadent” scenarios for his proto-modernist narratives of hysteria and sexual disorder. Women writers, meanwhile, struggled to find a place within the male- defined coteries of aestheticism and decadence, a theme dramatiZed in James’ tale “The Author of Beltraffio,” narrated by a decadent acolyte, in which the aestheticist project must be sequestered from female readers, who can only misconstrue it as immoral. Yet there were also alliances between male decadents and their feminist colleagues; Wilde promoted Schreiner's "Story of an African Farm," saluting its bold challenge to realist conventions as well as its symbolist exploration of colonialist malaise. In the class’s second part we will explore how the fin outlasted the siècle, maintaining an intense afterlife in the Anglo-American modernist writing of Yeats, James, Eliot, Joyce, Lawrence, and Djuna Barnes.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanticism, Aestheticism, and the Sensualism of Travel Engl
    Eat, Look, Go: Romanticism, Aestheticism, and the Sensualism of Travel Engl. 232, Fall 2011, San José State University Mon 4-6:45pm, Health Building 405 Dr. Katherine D. Harris Office: FO 220 Email: [email protected] Phone: (408) 924-4475 Website: www.sjsu.edu/faculty/harris/Courses.htm Office Hours: W 11:30-1:30 + online tools https://groups.google.com/group/romanticismtaste/ Twitter: @triproftri Google Chat: dr.katherine.harris COURSE DESCRIPTION The newly-established restaurant quickly became the preferred meeting place where critics, poets, artists, authors of the British Romantic Era discussed aesthetic standards. Then, they travelled abroad on the Grand Tour to discover the gustatory delights of foreign lands. Some returned from exotic locales with opium-induced, waking nightmares. Others indulged in dinner, opera, and artwork. Denise Gigante attributes this zest for taste to a quest for pleasure, a state of mind that the Romantics decidedly embraced. During the semester, we will read through, look at, map, and visualize the journey of the Romantic literary “(Wo)Man of Taste” through canonical and non-canonical authors alike, including Dorothy and William Wordsworth, Mary and Percy Shelley, Coleridge, DeQuincy, Wollstonecraft, Byron, Keats, Clare, Hogg, with quite a bit of visual pleasure included from Gilpin, Combe, Rowlandson, and Blake – all to reveal the relationship between aesthetic taste and appetite in Britain 1770-1837. ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES Students shall achieve the ability to write complete essays that demonstrate advanced proficiency in all of the following: 1. Read closely in a variety of forms, styles, structures, and modes, and articulate the value of close reading in the study of literature, creative writing, or rhetoric.
    [Show full text]
  • Dada Was an Artistic and Literary Movement That Began in Europe. It Started Off As a Reaction to the Violence of World War I, A
    DADA Dada was an artistic and literary movement that began in Europe. It started off as a reaction to the violence of World War I, addressing and calling out the issues of Bourgeois capitalist society, specifically violence, war and nationalism. Artists worked across a wide variety of mediums, expressing “nonsense, irrationality and anti‐bourgeois protest” in their works. Two artists that contributed to the movement include George Grosz and Francis Picabia. George Grosz’s painting “The Pillars of Society” is a german oil on canvas painting created in 1926. The painting is a sarcastic portrait of the Grosz’s representation of the corrupt and bourgeois society of Germany. Another artwork that contributed to the Dada movement is Francis Picabia’s “Fille née sans mère”[Girl Born Without a Mother], a French painting created in 1916‐1917 from watercolour, gouache and metallic paint on printed paper. The Dada movement began during the years of World War 1 as a response from artists in the involved countries expressing their anger and horror at the violence and atrocities that took place. Grosz lived in Berlin under the German empire during this time period and quickly made a name for himself through his witty satirical depictions of the Weimar government. His anger as a response to the war originated under the context of personal experience, as he himself was drafted enough times to observe the horrors of war before being permanently discharged as unfit. He then worked as a member of the Berlin Dada and New Objectivity group during the Weimar Republic, opposing the current German regime and concepts of nationalism and war.
    [Show full text]
  • Aestheticism Versus Realism? Narcissistic Mania of the Unheeded Soul in Oscar Wilde's the Picture of Dorian Gray
    ISSN 1799-2591 Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 1445-1451, July 2014 © 2014 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.7.1445-1451 Aestheticism versus Realism? Narcissistic Mania of the Unheeded Soul in Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray Ali Taghizadeh (corresponding author) Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran Mojtaba Jeihouni Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran Abstract—Wilde's complete adherence to aestheticism led him to write beautifully but maybe without any stress on the significance of morality. His only novel The Picture of Dorian Gray reveals his philosophy of aestheticism in both art and life. The standpoint of 'beauty' dominates the novel in a way that almost all of its possible themes are shadowed or directed through the strict filter of aestheticism. However, it seems that this is only a half-truth, as moral and social issues are also revealed with a fastidious precision. Dorian Gray is constantly troubled by the ghosts of conscience, aging, and alienation, and these ordeals force him into the dark dungeon of paranoia. Hence, the common knowledge concerning Wilde's art is a matter of debate, and this scrutiny essays to lay stress on the assumption that this novel is not solely an aesthetic work but a combination of aestheticism and realism. To accomplish this, the present study aims to delve into the inordinate fear and vulnerability of Dorian Gray's character, which is dominantly ruled by the fading beauty of his soul.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Syllabus : Russian Avant-Garde and Radical Modernism : an Introductory Reader
    ———————————————————— Introduction ———————————————————— THE RUSSIAN AVANT-GARDE AND RADICAL MODERNISM An Introductory Reader Edited by Dennis G. IOFFE and Frederick H. WHITE Boston 2012 — 3 — ——————————— RUSSIAN SUPREMATISM AND CONSTRUCTIVISM ——————————— 1. Kazimir Malevich: His Creative Path1 Evgenii Kovtun (1928-1996) Translated from the Russian by John E. Bowlt Te renewal of art in France dating from the rise of Impressionism extended over several decades, while in Russia this process was consoli- dated within a span of just ten to ffteen years. Malevich’s artistic devel- opment displays the same concentrated process. From the very begin- ning, his art showed distinctive, personal traits: a striking transmission of primal energy, a striving towards a preordained goal, and a veritable obsession with the art of painting. Remembering his youth, Malevich wrote to one of his students: “I worked as a draftsman... as soon as I got of work, I would run to my paints and start on a study straightaway. You grab your stuf and rush of to sketch. Tis feeling for art can attain huge, unbelievable proportions. It can make a man explode.”2 Transrational Realism From the early 1910s onwards, Malevich’s work served as an “experimen- tal polygon” in which he tested and sharpened his new found mastery of the art of painting. His quest involved various trends in art, but although Malevich firted with Cubism and Futurism, his greatest achievements at this time were made in the cycle of paintings he called “Alogism” or “Transrational Realism.” Cow and Violin, Aviator, Englishman in Moscow, Portrait of Ivan Kliun—these works manifest a new method in the spatial organization of the painting, something unknown to the French Cub- ists.
    [Show full text]
  • Vestures of the Past: the Other Historicisms of Victorian Aesthetics
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2019 Vestures Of The Past: The Other Historicisms Of Victorian Aesthetics Timothy Chandler University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Comparative Literature Commons Recommended Citation Chandler, Timothy, "Vestures Of The Past: The Other Historicisms Of Victorian Aesthetics" (2019). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3434. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3434 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3434 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vestures Of The Past: The Other Historicisms Of Victorian Aesthetics Abstract The importance of history to Victorian culture, and to nineteenth-century Europe more generally, is readily apprehended not only from its historiography, but also from its philosophy, art, literature, science, politics, and public institutions. This dissertation argues that the discourse of aesthetics in Victorian Britain constitutes a major area of historical thinking that, in contrast to the scientific and philosophical historicisms that dominated nineteenth-century European intellectual culture, focuses on individual experience. Its starting point is Walter Pater’s claim that we are born “clothed in a vesture of the past”—that is, that our relation to ourselves is historical and that our relation to history is aesthetic. Through readings of aesthetic theory and art criticism, along with works of historiography, fiction, poetry, and visual art, this dissertation explores some of the ways in which Victorian aesthetics addresses the problem of the relationship between the sensuous representation and experience of the historical, on the one hand, and the subjects of such representation and experience, on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Terms Tested Literary Criticism 2009-2015 Last Updated 12 July 2015
    Master List of Terms Tested Literary Criticism 2009-2015 last updated 12 July 2015 The first column details the year and test in which the term found in the second column serves as a correct answer; the remaining four columns offer the distractors used in a particular test item. I do not mind sending as an attachment a Word file that the coach and his or her team can manipulate in a manner that serves them best. Contact me: [email protected] Please contact me when you find a typo, inconsistency, or anything more serious: [email protected] Please note that the variety of distractors and, indeed, the terms themselves follows the editorial decisions that have characterized each succeeding edition of The Handbook to Literature. We are currently using the twelfth edition. Use Control + F to find a term. 2015 S rune keen koine logo siglum 2015 S ethos bathos logos mythos pathos 2015 S slam calypso rap reggae scat 2015 S aesthetics essentialism expressionism formalism metaphysics 2015 S dirge encomium epithalamium eulogy ode 2015 S tritagonist antagonist deuteragonist eiron protagonist 2015 S roman noir Gothic novel novel of incident roman à clef underground press 2015 S Agrarians Bet Generation Knickerbocker Group Muckrakers Transcendental Club 2015 S School of Donne Fleshly School of Poetry Graveyard School School of Night School of Spenser 2015 S epic question epic catalogue epic formula epic ideal epic simile 2015 S acatalectic catalectic chiasmic hypercatalectic vatic 2015 S philology belle-lettres exegesis lexicography synopsis 2015
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Theories of the Avant-Garde
    Cambridge University Press 0521648696 - Theorizing the Avant-Garde: Modernism, Expressionism, and the Problem of Postmodernity Richard Murphy Excerpt More information 1 ✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥ Theories of the avant-garde ✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥ It has been said that the degree to which a revolution is developing qualitatively different social conditions and relationships may perhaps be indicated by the devel- opment of a different language: the rupture with the continuum of domination must also be a rupture with the vocabulary of domination. Herbert Marcuse1 Introduction In his Theory of the Avant-Garde (1974) Peter Bu¨rger sets himself the taskof producing a definition of the progressive artistic move- ments of the early twentieth century that will both distinguish them from earlier avant-garde phenomena as well as from other contemporary artistic movements of the modernist period such as aestheticism.2 Although Bu¨rger’s model offers what purports to be a general definition of the historical avant-garde it is clear that for the most part his theoretical descriptions and analyses are oriented specifically towards dada and surrealism, his examples being drawn almost exclusively from these movements and in particular from the plastic arts rather than from literary texts. Notably absent from Bu¨rger’s analysis of the movements of the avant-garde, for example, is one of the seminal phenomena of early twentieth-century literature, film and art, namely German expressionism. Bu¨rger adds a suggestive note to the effect that one 1 An Essay on Liberation (Boston: Beacon, 1969), 33. 2 Peter Bu¨rger, Theorie der Avantgarde, (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1974). Here I refer wherever possible to the English translation by Michael Shaw, (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984).
    [Show full text]