Use of a Pathfinder Optical Telescope Element for James Webb Space Telescope Risk Mitigation
Lee D. Feinberga*,Ritva KeskiKuhaa, Charlie Atkinsonb, Scott C. Texter” aNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA 20771; 1’Northrup Grumman, Redondo Beach, CA USA
ABSTRACT
A Pathfmder of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Optical Telescope Element is being developed to check out critical ground support equipment and to rehearse integration and testing procedures. This paper provides a summary of the baseline Pathfmder configuration and architecture, objectives of this effort, limitations of Pathfinder, status of its development, and future plans. Special attention is paid to risks that will be mitigated by Pathfmder. Keywords: Space Telescope, JWST, OTE, James Webb Space Telescope, Pathfmder, Risk
1. INTRODUCTION The testing of JWST Optical Telescope Element 1(OTE) and Integrated Science Instrument System (ISIM) occurs as an integrated entity called the OTE-ISIM (OTIS) at the Johnson Space Center”. In order to assure the test is successful with asfewcryogenic cycles as is possible,anOTE Pathfinder is being funded by the prime contractor Northrop Grumman as an IR+D funded effort. NGAS’s current plan emphasizes optical checkout at cryogenic temperatures though an augmentation to the Pathfmder plan is in the process of being added to the program that would add thermal checkout and dynamics objectives.
2. BIsT0RY OF PATHFINDER The OTE Pathfmder has its roots in the Verification Engineering Test Articles implemented on the Chandra program wherein unfinished flight optics were used to aid in the development of, and to demonstrate the integration operations and X-ray optical testing of, the critical optical components of the telescope using GSE that was uniquely designedfor the purpose. A significant component of the VETA-I and VETA-Il effort was the rehearsal and demonstrations of integration and testing operations. This served to significantly reduce the implementation risk of the GSE and integration and X-Ray optical testing of the flight optical assembly. Similarly, the JWST OTE Pathfinder is intended to reduce the implementation risk of the assembly, integration, and cryogenic optical test of the JWST optical assembly. A key goal for the OTE Pathfinder is to allow early checkout of the optical test procedures and test equipment to be used for cryogenic optical testing prior to their use in testing the flight hardware. This is the original key objective of Pathfinder because it significantly reduces the likelihood that the Flight OTIS will require extra JSC test cycles because of optical GSE not performing as expected. Additional unplanned JSC cryogenic cycles pose a risk to flight hardware, risks performance degradation, and have large cost and schedule implications risks, as a single cool-down and warm-up cycle is expected to take of order two months to complete.
—
The be
Beam process
testing temperatures,
Assembly The
connections driven set cryogenic The the Mirror PMSA
OTIS this and
(SMSS) and
in structure
support only
construction
to A4 second Offloader is Pathfinder second OTE contains achieve so Image removed below Assembly of and C-segment controls, only is that to the Pathfmder test (PMSA) flight-like C4 cryogenic RMS allow augmentation that the Analyzer the OTIS; its interfaces and approximately with System locations to effort for cold will optics suspension and at (SMA) the for flow. spare cryogenic the A-segment cryo) however, configuration be in inspection survival mounting, at flight test (HOSS), (BIA) AOS, described, the structure, used for The in that that Pathfinder O-g, will the Primary cryogenic the system is the last and for in testing. is temperature. the be and Pathfinder uncoated (the 2 cryogenic place uncoated handling data same flight. cryogenic PMSAs, then performed Pathfinder but and for consists Engineering can Mirror J test to without to test The to a temperatures egress. ensure 3. be limited Ballast collect withstand and will and and (PF) testing facility the Figure OTE tuned PATHFINDER of Backplane test The with is polished follow polished shipment. SMSS, mechanisms a The nanometer Center not mass time, of images Center Pathfinder Pathfinder Design and without the at 1: the intended first transportation on JSC the Pathfinder is JSC the the the Pathfinder to Section. Support to the Section at added Pathfmder Unit basic approximately is Some isolation flight AOS, approximately the the level shrouds OTE engaged. shown shown OTE to - AOS, Pathfinder DESCRIPTION to timeline EDU) match Aft of Structure structure stability The and Configuration Pathfinder the is will loads the in in and set cryogenic Optics mounted an hard-points Pathfinder HOSS Figure Figure The that the Pathfinder have to augmentation damping of and lOOnrn at no focal and lOOnm (PMBSS), dynamic is Pathfinder the System operating the as to lower polished support 2 1 to enough test flight replicate will and contains surface. AOS the Secondary RMS to can RMS BSF will than (AOS). includes response support be HOSS test the but be in temperatures. Center test Backplane to at achieved is be at 30K, place, a exercised Due the test flight in ambient without used ambient Primary of operated using terms Mirror ground The expected installation thermal configuration of to Section to only but requirements the limitations ensure with PMSAs the the Support O-g, of as will (currently Mirror Support handling. OTIS. with for balance It same pre-preg it GSE, the is mass the is also will ambient the without on the are flight designed Fixture EDU Segment hardpoint BIA at and of the and Structure be have JSC points, and positioned expected cryo. the bleedout, It during Hardpoint OTIS a CG handling Secondary is wings is coated, shrouds the BIA, (B not similar to of SF) test. the to and in a being last JSC. relationship The colunm some Backplane elements testing cooldown A key column, testing The form. used objective of describes that the second and Support for planned between They nearly OTIS will warm-up the of the column not are test. the every Fixture, at with the objective also be JSC. OTE timelines The OTIS replicated the optical describes intended To and Pathfmder last OTE and of do the column test each than Pathfinder this the during the to ISIM can exercise most planned will key is specific describes be to and the be optical 4. check checked efficiently, is the OTE experienced Figure OPTICAL the OTE intended tests IEC. out parameter optical what Pathfmder planned. Pathfinder out 2: the MU is at to Pathfinder procedures test planned for some exercise OBJECTIVES is that equipment The flight. testing, not testing level is put third using at measured all and There JSC using including on is the colunm the that summarized GSE the optical are the OTE Pathfinder will during that also OTE describes the — be Pathfinder. tests will Center a used the Pathfinder. in large planned be OTE Table fmal the in used Section number the optical to flight As I for as OTIS enable below. can part the wings, test of test be test’ 11 . flight OTIS of much of The seen equipment the the the hardware in The first optical faster from OTIS at least the at Image Image Radiornethc Stability WFSC Sensitivity tional Parameter Quality Quality Thermal PM Multi-field mid Ambient motion PM Fine WF (SMA Thermal PM FPMSA Change tRogue during (Figure S&C Pupil 1PM Plate (single SI low ISIM SMA WFS&C (tilt FOV conic RoC to freq of Control Collection frequency Guidance Scale to to Alignment/Truant alignment AOS warm single Path ACF Envelope control drift Survey AOS AOS Distortion: Distortion: PM PMSA Influence Demo PSF alignment Signal of aperture, WFE up ACF alignment alignment PM Lqp Area PM sign Table from WFE drift Control Test & WFE Functions Path over check Alignment PM NIRCam) cryo 1: each over WFE (PMSA, temp Pathfinder Limit Path test) test temp Si) ______ ______ change) & temp) Change ______ change RoC SMA _____Rogue JOA Testing grammetry otogrammetry 4ucial poapmetiy fCoA, ICOCOA Pass [Pass Photogrammetry COCOA, {alf Pass photogrammetry Pass Pass COCOA cocoA Half COCOA COCOA COCOA Optical -— and Pass, and Pass, and and and path lights a a a a a (reflection Test ADM ADM Fiducial Pass Half Half Half, Half, Half illumination Equipment and COCOA, COCOA, Lights a area) Half - Jves Yes With With With With With With With With With Yes Partial With Partial for With With With With PMSA closed With & SMA & With Pathfinder BIA BIA, monitoring) 2 BIA BJA 2 2 2 2 BIA 2 2 BIA BIA 2 2PMSAs 2PMSAs 1 loop (no (no PMSAs PMSAs PMSAs PMSAs PMSAs PMSAs PMSA PMSAs, PMSAs, and limited B3 FGS) SMA control Approach segment to & & SMA SMA BIA those necessary place accuracy translation AOS this Interferometer analyzed performance the comparison however, veracity OTIS The OTIS. changes All exercised. fiducial multi-wavelength addition, imaging cryogenic OTE the measurement as-measured Source used of test. The aspects the lights of during Pathfinder of of via the the for test. for stage the The PMSAs DM1 the of Science phase Plate. will incoherent method phase the (see predicted in COCOA of comparison a optical This large is the thermal WFE not on OTIS aligning interferometry, retrieval section positioned The retrieval test, using Instruments BIA the includes be to enough metrology (manually of introduce testing. measurement. created. limiting illumination the optical OTE Fine Mounting excursion will the the 3.4). the will Subsystem to shroud Alignment and PMSAs camera using Pathfinder to Figure allow to PMSAs recover adjustable) performance The be Focus Hexapod and capture aperture Aperture— pupil view The the of for esAIignm)Cj://\ coarse. Plate temperature in the process some the provide of in 3: the temperature Half-Pass — will a the the alignment to diversity The coarse the the manner 2 the Center is thermal Enclosure the in PMSAs. C4 WFE. level be Pressure Subsystem PMSA to interferometer DM1 this focal of COCOA, change a compared PMSA, ensure and science-grade in-situ of of test ) comparable change case is using will The distortion (PTE) Tight surface change comparison Curvature provided fine and The configuration to the is be so phase calibration edge shown the alignment measured the will to steps it used measurement over will what will can inward FSM test retrieval by detection to dominate Optical detector involved in in differ be to the the also g BIA will was conjunction Mask. Figure the using data, used subsystems shown FoV. sources. PM be be motion. measured due recovered Assembly algorithms V at LI methodology the performed, systems during Figure hence the in the 3, For the to Through-focus in aligning temperature will same reflective the In Figure Pathfinder the with Translatton Pupil a and the Stability addition, at be difference quantitative lnterferometers will Displacement Multi WFE (COCOA) Pathfinder will on the Pathfmder exercised the the as the 4 imaging Wavelength work the using XRCF uses be will hologram via interferometer identification Stage COCOA change. OTE measurement OTE a similar images phase r(MWIF) the together, in Point the downward Measuring test, (DMIs) expectation as during is thermal focal test Pathfinder camera’s COCOA also a retrieval, Moreover, will to, Diffraction to the will means as the surface but provided not the BIA well and also be to configurations. planned sources two not to imaging OTE camera monitor to collected of phasing, as will as be though enable assess on PMSAs identical observed the for during exercised. Pathfinder by take a on for the intent will the of RoC the the a the via and the the OTIS; the the via BIA, be to, of For In by provides fields The parameter part and illumination Exercising Focal in include comparing of Exercising 3000 the defocus, the re-imaged Pass-and-a-Half of nm presence of Surface SMA the the view a mis) to OTE check the the the providing location of and the by relative that at half-pass focus, half-pass 3 of optical phase PM the PMSAs tilting of the will the in OTE test and astigmatism background additional to 1 retrieval also location design. the g test test the configuration that in of focal ACF(s). exist the the AOS will enables collimated flight surface. algorithms. It AOS of diagnostic also in and levels interface will the the practicing The allow configuration and coma sources also uses OTIS that light Figure The limiting source produce capability. in for upward-looking from The will images test is six relative WFE practicing 4: reflected larger plates, exist degrees due the aperture Half and pupil recovery are retrieved to to in range partial Past along the steered the the back intensity of determination in imperfect freedom. sources TM. Test JSC this of with in through phase illumination motion to the case chamber Configuration It maps various an presence on also map is initial imaging Other the the of of the from provides to the during OTE field field AOS of ACF AOS practice Plate that valuable of the BIA the at tilt locations by the expected Source the aperture inward testing. 2 AOS a (tens the and PMSAs residual check run Cassegrain Source information Autocollimating image Plate. of for sources, representing which by of mm) in imaging uncorrected the the centroiding. the The enables focus location includes source an that OTE light important and the will that Pathfmder Flats locations several is WFE of image partial various is be collimated In the an (ACF5) gained addition, (up input OTE analysis waves inherent SI to where only a single ACF is used. During the Pathfmder test, the BIA will take the place of the Science Instruments as in the Half Pass test. Once again, phase retrieval using through-focus images recovers the WFE. Other important optical testing includes pupil testing and ciyo photogrammetry which measures alignment of the system. The testing will also check out the rogue path illumination system shown in Figure 5. During the Pathfmder test the Signal to Background ratio and overall illumination levels can be assessed whereas during the flight OTIS testing, these rays should be blocked and no illumination should be detected. This enables the Pathfinder test to demonstrate the rogue path test process and also demonstrate that a sufficient signal should be present if the OTIS rogue path mitigation is in error. It also checks the aligmnent of the rogue path sources to the 0Th under cryogenic conditions. String(6x)of sources ouId L— Rogue Path I Sources +v1 H Figure 5: Rogue Path Configuration The Pathfinder testing will also check out the cryo position metrology which consists of an Absolute Distance Meter (ADM) and the Photogrammetry system, which includes targets, cameras, rotating mechanisms and data collection and processing. 5. DYNAMICS The risk reduction aspects of the Patbfmder testing at JSC as it applies to dynamics is entirely within the realm of ensuring that viable optical data can be obtained. To that end, the JSC test configuration will have the suspension system isolators and TMDs and the HOSS damper, plus some representation of the shorts to ground provided by the cables and the HOSS cooling lines. Ballast mass is added to the HOSS to replicate the expected mass and CG of the OTIS so that the suspension system can be tuned. Successfully collecting optical performance data with the interferometer in the COCOA during the first Pathfinder cryo test, and then with the Pass-and-a-half test during the second Pathfinder cryo test, will provide the desired risk reduction associated with dynamics effects on the optical measurements. / • risoiator Ballast 6 Isolators to chamber TMD j WingTMD L14,L123L14 (GSE) 71 HOSSSpring a: &MagDamper 1_BallastMass Figure 6: Dynamics Configuration Before the OTE Pathfinder test, a dynamics model will be run using the input PSDs measured at JSC during its certification, the model of the test configuration representing the design as implemented on the JSC chamber, and a dynamics model of the OTE Pathfmder to provide an expectation for the magnitude of the vibration in the optical measurements. In addition, planning is ongoing to add cryo accelerometers and stingers to help check out the dynamics and also to address the cryo performance of the flight dynamic system. 6. THERMAL The thermal configuration of the OTE Pathfmder will be quite different than for the OTIS test. Most notably, the ISIM and IEC will not be present, nor will the TMS hardware including the ISIM radiators, +/-V2 radiators, PTR and the MU and SLI closeouts of the OTE. What will be present are the 2 non-flight PMSAs (one uncoated), non-flight SMA (uncoated), and the AOS. The flight FSM de-contamination heater will be in place and used during warm up. The method for warming up the Tertiary Mirror and SMA is undefined for the flight OTIS test, but will be replicated for the Pathfinder test at JSC. The PMSA warm-up method has been defined for the flight OTIS test. Its implementation for the Pathfmder OTE will be similar, using the OTIS decontamination heaters and some Pathfmder-specific local blanketing. Work is ongoing to define a thermal augmentation effort that will include development of a 3D thermal model using the PMBSS thermal model. The augmentation test will propose to test the same temperature profile planned for the flight “Feinberg The program. ‘Feinberg, “ limited The installation be experience, including The dynamics. OTIS. enables removed a The be monitoring onto Warmup the fully with During the test large flight correlation Atkinson dry placed demonstrated Pathfmder operations including authors OTE handling electrical the re-pressurization exercised run contamination-sensitive will Installation to the checkout HOSS procedures, from for Pathfmder monitoring key adjacent be et Keski-Kuha, This OTE et efforts and during we would those al, exercised operations al, balance teammates and between the on during expect will handling “New will Pathfmder during “Architecting of the container data aimed operations operations. to like of be the serves assure using HOSS, the of the points rates the the Approach handling similar both to the alignment the Atkinson, critical during procedures PM at Ball OTE thank Pathfinder Pathfinder two the to practicing the OTE operations 1 using to moving and like in structure. reduce Aerospace, to, Pathfinder protect a The FSM GSE Torr/min OTE clearances the the the aspects Revised to Pathfmder thermal they though the Texter, on OTE Cryogenic OTE very JSC and intended heater Pathfmder test. to the the the same for will the at be of Contamination ISO large optical OTE Pathfmder risk Pathfinder will JSC, HOSS, much Optical distortion. the into ITT, hardware “Results, However, an through the be and processes testing. 9. Class flight of also extremely for 7. for the Pathfinder both team Optical OGSE and reduced any ACKNOWLEDGEMENT cryo implementing GSE. and use Test the JSC be OTHER REFERENCES the 7 ATK test. inside GSE across Status will will on 8. Re-pressurization the The tests several cleanroom will demonstrated. flight will as Approach Testing chamber We chamber the monitoring from, valuable be science be the SUMMARY as decontamination into effort work the and be and the are OTE OTIS a transported well flight other the subset chamber the CHECKOUT the during country the in the Plans will as will door. that pipeline Pathfinder as for same the tool test. chamber, operations needed testing OTIS. JWST”, key L3 includes include of JWST”, use process include for exodus for working those as alignments SSG-Tinsley, operations and using many the and reducing in at The during heaters SPIE out, performing and the thermal JSC. JWST particulate, unloading performed to of SPIE from spacecraft the operations of install the adding flight to on Proc. the same the A using for practice critical the risk Proc., the OTE”, contamination and key flight same SAO OTIS the the JSC JWST 6265-23 container to checkout the ambient on ISO simulator molecular, thermal element to 70 Tertiary the OTIS to SPIE and operations their flight test. OTE facility. 10-26 install test properly Class OTE overall NASAIMSFC. (2006) operations, on and implementation Proc, Based Pathfinder, of distortion as and of Mirror protocols will (2008) the 5 including the Witness thermal the temperature, this therefore (Class integration will configuring as (2010) OTE not HOSS. on OTIS; is the and therefore past be to model performing 100) Pathfinder and samples planned installing OTIS, but check used. SMA, will it This will on and not gas and the be act out a will be test for will RH as