DOCSLIB.ORG

Access to Healthcare for People Facing Multiple Vulnerabilities in Health in 31 Cities in 12 Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Access to Healthcare for People Facing Multiple Vulnerabilities in Health in 31 Cities in 12 Countries © Olmo CALVO/ Médicos del Mundo © Olmo CALVO/ Welcoming refugees in Europe Access to healthcare for people facing multiple vulnerabilities in health in 31 cities in 12 countries C : 100 M : 60 J : 0 N : 0 NovemberMédecins du monde - Identité visuelle ANGLETERRE 08/07/2009 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3/ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 27/ BARRIERS IN ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE 4/ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview 27 5/ 2015 IN FIGURES Giving up seeking medical European survey results (11 countries) 5 advice or treatment 30 Key figures for Turkey 5 Denial of access to care by a health provider 30 Focus: Pregnant women 5 Discrimination in healthcare facilities 30 Focus: Children 6 Fear of being arrested 30 Focus: Violence 6 31/ SELF-PERCEIVED HEALTH STATUS 7/ EUROPEAN NETWORK AND INTERNATIONAL OBSERVATORY 32/ HEALTH STATUS 7/ THE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC Health problems 32 AND POLITICAL CONTEXT IN 2015 Contraception 32 Urgent care 32 10/ RECENT LEGAL CHANGES, Acute and chronic health conditions 33 FOR BETTER OR WORSE Necessary treatment 33 France 10 Patients had received little or Germany 10 no care before visiting our clinics 33 Greece 10 Chronic conditions: Luxembourg 10 no access, no continuity 34 Norway 10 Infectious disease screening 34 Spain 10 Sweden 11 36/ FOCUS ON PREGNANT WOMEN Switzerland 11 Geographic origin of pregnant women 37 Turkey 11 Administrative status 37 United Kingdom 11 Living conditions 37 Isolation 37 12/ 2015 INTERNATIONAL Limiting movements 37 OBSERVATORY SURVEY HIV and hepatitis screening 38 Methodology 12 Access to healthcare 38 Statistics 12 Pregnant women and non-access Limitations 12 to antenatal care 38 Participating programmes 13 39/ FOCUS ON CHILDREN 14/ DEMOGRAPHIC Children and vaccination 40 CHARACTERISTICS Unaccompanied migrant children 40 Sex and age 14 Nationality and geographical origin 14 42/ FOCUS ON VIOLENCE Focus on nationalities in Greece 16 Global figures and Reasons for migration 17 consequences for health 42 Reasons for consulting MdM Experiences of violence in medical history 42 and partner clinics 19 45/ 8 NGOS IN 11 COUNTRIES 19/ ADMINISTRATIVE SITUATION TO SUPPORT MIGRANTS Administrative status 19 IN TRANSIT PROGRAMME Overview 46 Focus on asylum seekers 21 Greece 46 22/ LIVING CONDITIONS Italy 46 Housing conditions 22 Slovenia 47 Social isolation and family situation 23 Germany 47 Work and income 25 48/ CONCLUSION 26/ ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE 49/ ACRONYMS Coverage of healthcare charges 26 49/ AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS 50/ RECOMMENDATIONS 2 / ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost we would like to thank the 30,534 patients who generously took time to speak with us and respond to our questions about the realities of their lives, the difficulties and pain they have encountered along the way, despite the social and health problems they were facing at the time we met each of them. This report would not have been possible without the contribution of all the coordinators and teams of volunteers and staff from the various Doctors of the World – Médecins du monde programmes and partner programmes: ASEM in Turkey and the Health Centre for Undocumented Migrants in Norway, who collected data as part of the European Network to reduce vulnerabilities in health. This work received support from the Ministry of Health (France), the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM), a collaborative initiative of the Network of European Foundations (NEF) and the European Commission – DG Health and Food Safety / CHAFEA under a grant from the European Union’s Health Programme (2014-2020). The authors of this report are entirely responsible for the content of this document and the content does not necessarily reflect the positions of the NEF-EPIM or partner foundations, Ministry of Health (FR) and DG Health and Food Safety / CHAFEA. The content of this report represents the views of the authors only and is their sole responsibility; it cannot be considered to reflect the views of the European Commission and/or the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency or any other body of the European Union. The European Commission and the Agency do not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains. 3 / © Olmo CALVO/Médicos del Mundo © Olmo CALVO/Médicos “Healthy migrant” effect: not always a reality – Athens EXECUTIVE SUMMARY reveals exclusion from mainstream healthcare systems. Within the data collected in face–to-face interviews with over In Europe, 2015 will stay in all our memories as the year where 30,000 patients during 89,000 consultations, we analysed international solidarity with migrants and refugees showed “only” the full interviews, including social and medical data of its strength and weaknesses. This strength was seen in the 10,447 patients seen in 38,646 consultations in 12 countries. thousands of individuals of all nationalities responding to people’s needs and hopes, organising themselves to help; Among those surveyed, 94.2% were foreign citizens, with it was also seen in all the NGOs who concentrated their 24.7% migrant EU citizens and 69.5% migrant citizens of volunteers and staff to provide help all along the migratory route. non-EU countries. Weaknesses were seen in the coordination between individuals Half of patients seen had permission to reside in the country and NGOs, between NGOs, between state initiatives, NGOs where we met them (50.6% in Europe). and individuals. Nevertheless, the solidarity of all these people and organisations worked. And it worked everywhere thanks Multiple barriers to accessing healthcare were described, to the strength and determination of the migrants and refugees including lack of health coverage for 67.5%, need for to survive and live in a protective environment. interpreting for 40.8% and financial barriers for 24.3%. In the previous 12 months, 21.5% had given up seeking medical The real deception came from most European governments, care or treatment, 9.2% had been denied care in a health who were unable to translate this solidarity into reality, facility and 39.6% of the patients without permission to unable to share common rules, in order to provide a positive, reside limited their movements for fear of being arrested. respectful response to the needs of the people fleeing wars, conflicts and life-threatening circumstances. As a consequence, most health conditions had not been treated properly before arriving at MdM or a partner clinic, At the same time, the population in Greece is still afflicted by even if most patients had been living in the host country for the social and economic crisis. And the austerity measures a year or more. In addition, among the reasons mentioned are harsh in their impact on everyday life. As the new for migration, only 3.5% said that they left their country of president of the International Federation for Human Rights, origin for personal health reasons, among others. These Dimitris Christopoulos, said: “The violation of social rights figures show that migration for health reasons is not a reality [education, health, work] resulted in my country […] in an concerning the people we meet and that this myth should be almost systematic violation of individual rights. The austerity erased from political discourse. policies reinforce the idea that social cohesion is not so much an obligation of the state but an act of charity”. Pregnant women still do not have access to perinatal care in Europe, with 43.6% of pregnant women interviewed not able The Médecins du monde (MdM) – Doctors of the World to access antenatal care before attending an MdM or partner International Network’s report Access to healthcare for clinic, 38.9% receiving care after the 12th week of pregnancy people facing multiple vulnerabilities in health, based on and 67.8% having no health coverage and having to pay. medical and social data collected throughout 2015 in 31 cities in 12 countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Another example concerns children under 18 years old, as Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, unacceptably high levels of non-vaccination were reported: Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom), once more 29.8% for tetanus, 35.8% for hepatitis B virus, 40.0% for 4 / measles, mumps and rubella and 34.4% for whooping 73.7% required necessary treatment cough. Protecting children against such avoidable illnesses 51.1% had at least one chronic condition should be possible everywhere, for all children, all the more that had not received medical attention for those who live in high-risk environments. 54.7% had at least one health problem that Many patients reported experiences of violence, including had never been treated or followed-up violence perpetrated by the police or armed forces for more than 18% in Europe, sexual violence including rape for almost 17.7% perceived their general and their physical 15% of them, and psychological violence for 26% of the health as poor and 19.8% perceived their mental patients. Violent experiences occurred in the country of origin, health as poor but also during the journey and in the host country (particularly BARRIERS TO ACCESSING HEALTHCARE experiences of hunger and psychological violence). There is a significant lack of mental health support in the “host” 67.5% of the people seen in Europe had no countries. These figures show clearly the response needed in health coverage (no coverage or only access to term of protection, security and access to care. emergency care) 40.8% required an interpreter 2015 IN FIGURES 24.3% reported financial barriers 14.2% reported administrative problems
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of Legislative Assistance in the European Parliament
    PhD-FLSHASE-2015-12 The Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education DISSERTATION Defense held on 27 March 2015 in Luxembourg to obtain the degree of DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DU LUXEMBOURG EN SCIENCES POLITIQUES by Andreja PEGAN Born on 1 February 1985 in Koper (Slovenia) An Analysis of Legislative Assistance in the European Parliament Dissertation defense committee: Dr. Philippe Poirier, dissertation supervisor Université du Luxembourg Dr. Christine Neuhold Professor, University of Maastricht Dr. Robert Harmsen, Chairman Professor, Université du Luxembourg Dr. Cristina Fasone European University Institute Dr. Olivier Costa, Vice Chairman Professor, Centre Emile Durkheim Sciences Po Bordeaux, College of Europe Brugge Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor Philippe Poirier for giving me the opportunity to do this PhD. Thank you also to Robert Harmsen, David Howarth and Anna-Lena Högenauer from the Political Science Institute. I am grateful to Olivier Costa who served on my Assessment Committee (CET). Morten Egeberg kindly hosted me at the Arena Centre for European Studies and provided me with valuable comments on my research. Assistance given by Guy Vanhaeverbeke has been a great help in the field stage of my research. I am particularly grateful to all the respondents who took the time to speak with me or participated in the online survey. This research was supported by the National Research Fund Luxembourg (FNR) under the funding scheme Aides à la Formation Recherche (AFR) (Project number 1080494). My
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Trends in Public-Sector Performance and Productivity in Europe
    Recent Trends in Public-sector Performance and Productivity in Europe First published in Japan by the Asian Productivity Organization Leaf Square Hongo Building 2F 1-24-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 113-0033, Japan www.apo-tokyo.org © 2016 Asian Productivity Organization Asian Productivity Organization (APO) or any APO member. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the official views of the All rights reserved. None of the contents of this publication may be used, reproduced, stored, or transferred in any form or by any means for commercial purposes without prior written permission from the APO. i CONTENTS Acknowledgement iii Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction, Background, and Key Learning Points 3 2. First Public-sector Performance Study Mission in Europe 8 3. Case Studies and Learning Points 10 Delegates 12 4. Summary of Key Benefits and Learning Points by Study Mission 5. European Public-sector Initiatives: Evolution and Recent Trends and Topics at the 8QC 15 6. The EIPA 20 7. The CAF 21 8. Key Learning Points on the CAF by Study Mission Delegates 23 9. Conclusions and Recommendations to the APO 24 References 29 Figures Figure 1. APO PSP Program framework. 6 Figure 2. Study mission map. 8 Figure 3. Delegate feedback on the study mission. 13 Figure 4. OECD toolbox overview by theme and topic. 18 Figure 5. The CAF model. 21 Annex 1. Site Visits and Presentation Reports 30 Annex 2. Report on the APO Study Mission on Recent Trends in Public-sector Productivity and Performance in Europe (Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, and Luxembourg) from September 27 to October 2, 2015 under the APO Development of Center of Excellence by Magdalena L.
    [Show full text]
  • Luxembourg's Development Cooperation Annual Report 2015
    Luxembourg’s development cooperation Annual report 2015 Lëtzebuerger Entwécklungszesummenaarbecht www.cooperation.lu There is also an independent microsite containing the annual reports on Luxembourg’s development cooperation since 2010 at the following address: www.cooperation.lu. Table of contents Annual report 2015 4 Introduction by the Minister 7 Meetings and trips in 2015 11 European Year for Development 14 COP21 and the Paris Agreement 16 I. Luxembourg’s official development assistance in 2015 26 II. Cooperation with the main partner countries 26 The new Indicative Cooperation Programmes and the focus on least developed countries 29 Africa 29 Burkina Faso 30 Cabo Verde 31 Mali 32 Niger 33 Senegal 34 Central America 34 El Salvador 35 Nicaragua 36 Asia 36 Laos 37 Vietnam 38 III. Regional cooperation and cooperation with other countries 40 Balkans (Kosovo – Montenegro – Serbia) 40 Mongolia 41 Myanmar 42 Occupied Palestinian Territories 43 Afghanistan/Tajikistan 44 IV. Multilateral cooperation 53 V. European Union 55 VI. Cooperation with development NGOs 59 VII. Humanitarian action 67 VIII. Programme support 69 IX. Development education and awareness raising 70 X. Inclusive finance 71 XI. Evaluation 73 XII. Report on the progress of the work of the Interministerial Committee 77 Appendices 77 A. Useful addresses 79 B. Organisational chart of the Directorate for Development Cooperation 81 C. Useful links 3 Introduction by the Minister Dear friends of Luxembourg’s development cooperation, It is my pleasure to present to you this annual report 2015 on Luxembourg de- velopment cooperation. In last year’s annual report I highlighted the fact that 2015 would be a pivotal year for development cooperation and that the major international meetings would to a large extent reconfigure our post-2015 devel- opment cooperation and its financing.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Mechanisms for Innovative Social and Solidarity Economy Ecosystems
    Financial Mechanisms for Innovative 100 Social and Solidarity Economy 95 Ecosystems 75 25 5 0 Cover_BASE 11 November 2019 09:30:13 Financial Mechanisms for Innovative Social and Solidarity Economy Ecosystems Samuel Barco Serrano1, Riccardo Bodini2, Michael Roy,3 Gianluca Salvatori4 1 Co-founder and CEO, SOKIO Cooperative. 2 Director, Euricse. 3 Professor of Economic Sociology and Social Policy, Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health/Glasgow Schoof for Business and Society, Glasgow Caledonian University. 4 Secretary General, Euricse. Copyright © International Labour Organization 2019 First published 2019 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Financial mechanisms for innovative social and solidarity economy ecosystems –
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Healthcare Quality in Europe
    Cover_WHO_nr52.qxp_Mise en page 1 20/08/2019 16:31 Page 1 51 THE ROLE OF PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ADDRESSING PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEMS IN EUROPE PUBLIC HEALTH IN ADDRESSING ORGANIZATIONS PUBLIC HEALTH THE ROLE OF Quality improvement initiatives take many forms, from the creation of standards for health Improving healthcare 53 professionals, health technologies and health facilities, to audit and feedback, and from fostering a patient safety culture to public reporting and paying for quality. For policy- makers who struggle to decide which initiatives to prioritise for investment, understanding quality in Europe Series the potential of different quality strategies in their unique settings is key. This volume, developed by the Observatory together with OECD, provides an overall conceptual Health Policy Health Policy framework for understanding and applying strategies aimed at improving quality of care. Characteristics, effectiveness and Crucially, it summarizes available evidence on different quality strategies and provides implementation of different strategies recommendations for their implementation. This book is intended to help policy-makers to understand concepts of quality and to support them to evaluate single strategies and combinations of strategies. Edited by Quality of care is a political priority and an important contributor to population health. This Reinhard Busse book acknowledges that "quality of care" is a broadly defined concept, and that it is often Niek Klazinga unclear how quality improvement strategies fit within a health system, and what their particular contribution can be. This volume elucidates the concepts behind multiple elements Dimitra Panteli of quality in healthcare policy (including definitions of quality, its dimensions, related activities, Wilm Quentin and targets), quality measurement and governance and situates it all in the wider context of health systems research.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Sector Landscape in Mixed Health Systems
    Private Sector Landscape in Mixed Health Systems © WHO / Karen Reidy. Ocial WHO Logo Font: Frutiger 67 Bold Condensed Color: Black or Pantone 2925 Private Sector Landscape Private Sector Landscape in Mixed Health Systems in Mixed Health Systems ISBN TBD (electronic version) ISBN TBD (print version) © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence This is a conference copy (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested This publication was undertaken under the overall guidance of citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this Dr Peter Salama (WHO) and Dr Zsuzsanna Jakab (WHO). translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. The editor for this publication is David Clarke (technical lead Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the for WHOs work on private sector engagement for UHC).
    [Show full text]
  • Benchmarking Working Europe 2018 ETUI Publications Are Published to Elicit Comment and to Encourage Debate
    European List Trade Union Institute Boulevard du Roi Albert II, 5, box 4 of country B-1210 Brussels Benchmarking codes + 32 (0)2 224 04 70 [email protected] www.etui.org AT Austria Working Europe BE Belgium European BG Bulgaria Trade Union Confederation Boulevard du Roi Albert II, 5 CH Switzerland B-1210 Brussels 2018 CY Cyprus CZ Czech Republic + 32 (0)2 224 04 11 [email protected] DE Germany www.etuc.org DK Denmark EE Estonia ES Spain FI Finland FR France GR Greece HR Croatia HU Hungary IE Ireland IT Italy LT Lithuania LU Luxembourg LV Latvia MT Malta NL Netherlands NO Norway PL Poland PT Portugal RO Romania SE Sweden SI Slovenia SK Slovakia UK United Kingdom US United States EA EU Member States (19) that adopted the euro before 2016 EU13 EU ‘new’ Member States that joined the EU after 2004 EU15 EU Member States that joined the EU before 2004 EU27 EU Member States that joined the EU ISBN: 978-2-87452-469-1 before 2012 D/2018/10.574/04 EU28 EU Member States that joined the EU before 2014 List The European The European of country Trade Union Institute Trade Union Confederation codes (ETUI) (ETUC) AT Austria BE Belgium The ETUI conducts research in areas of The institute’s work is organised in The European Trade Union The ETUC is the only social partner BG Bulgaria relevance to the trade unions, including accordance with the following five common Confederation (ETUC) exists to speak representing workers at European CH Switzerland the labour market and industrial relations, priorities: with a single voice, on behalf of the level in the framework of the European and produces European comparative — Policies and actions for the future of common interests of workers, at social dialogue.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Activity Report
    lkjlkjhjhhon–– 2015 Activity Report 2015 Activity Report www.orpha.net Table of contents Abbreviation list ........................................................................................................................... 4 1. Overview .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1. Objective .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Activities ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3. Highlights of 2015 ...................................................................................................................... 7 Orphanet international positioning ............................................................................................... 7 Improving transparency and traceability ....................................................................................... 7 Orphanet database updates ........................................................................................................... 7 Orphanet documents update ......................................................................................................... 7 Orphanet website information ...................................................................................................... 8 Codification of RD using ORPHA codes .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Luxembourg Presidency Conclusions 2015-11-27 (Final)
    27 November 2015 PRESIDENCY CONCLUSIONS of the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council of the European Union on the occasion of the Informal Ministerial Meetings on Territorial Cohesion and Urban Policy Luxembourg, 26 and 27 November 2015 At the invitation of the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council of the European Union, the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Territorial Cohesion took place in Luxembourg on 26 November 2015 and the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Policy took place in Luxembourg on 27 November 2015. The Ministers responsible for Territorial Cohesion and Urban Policy in the European Union, together with the Commissioner for Regional Policy of the European Commission, the Chair of the Committee on Regional Development of the European Parliament, the President of the European Committee of the Regions, the President of the ECO Section of the European Economic and Social Committee, representatives of the European Investment Bank, representatives from Serbia and Turkey as well as Norway and Switzerland, and representatives of relevant stakeholder organisations and several observers, (1) Considering that in the framework of intergovernmental cooperation the Territorial Agenda 2020 was decided with the aim of promoting and enhancing an integrated and place-based territorial approach to support territorial cohesion, and was subject to an evaluation of the necessity to be reviewed under the Latvian and Luxembourg Presidencies; territorial cohesion was considered as a new EU objective in the Lisbon Treaty and the Treaty has now
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from a Controlled Trial of a Healthcare System
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Copenhagen University Research Information System Know where to go Evidence from a controlled trial of a healthcare system information intervention among immigrants Jervelund, Signe Smith; Maltesen, Thomas; Wimmelmann, Camilla Lawaetz; Petersen, Jørgen Holm; Krasnik, Allan Published in: B M C Public Health DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5741-x Publication date: 2018 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Jervelund, S. S., Maltesen, T., Wimmelmann, C. L., Petersen, J. H., & Krasnik, A. (2018). Know where to go: Evidence from a controlled trial of a healthcare system information intervention among immigrants. B M C Public Health, 18, [863]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5741-x Download date: 09. apr.. 2020 Jervelund et al. BMC Public Health (2018) 18:863 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5741-x RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Know where to go: evidence from a controlled trial of a healthcare system information intervention among immigrants Signe Smith Jervelund1* , Thomas Maltesen2, Camilla Lawaetz Wimmelmann1, Jørgen Holm Petersen2 and Allan Krasnik1 Abstract Background: Immigrants may face problems with accessing the Danish healthcare system due to, for example, lack of knowledge of how to navigate it, which may cause inappropriate healthcare-seeking. Danish municipalities provide a mandatory introduction and language programme for newly arrived immigrants, but no information on the healthcare system is offered. This study investigated what effects information about the Danish healthcare system may have on the hypothetical healthcare-seeking behaviour of newly arrived immigrants and their actual healthcare use.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Health Care in Europe (Eng)
    POLICY SUMMARY 14 Cross-border health care in Europe Katharine Footman, Cécile Knai, Rita Baeten, Ketevan Glonti, Martin McKee eu Keywords: © World Health Organization 2014 (acting as the host organization for, and secretariat of, the European BURDEN OF ILLNESS Observatory on Health Systems and Policies) CHRONIC DISEASE COST EFFECTIVENESS Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Offi ce for Europe to: DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED Publications WHO Regional Offi ce for Europe HEALTH CARE ECONOMICS UN City, Marmorvej 51, AND ORGANIZATIONS DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark HEALTH POLICY Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Offi ce web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). All rights reserved. The Regional Offi ce for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specifi c companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar This policy summary nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions is one of a new series excepted, the names of proprietary products are to meet the needs distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Health Care in the European Region
    Financing health care in the European Union Th e European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies supports and promotes evidence- based health policy-making through comprehensive and rigorous analysis of health systems in Europe. It brings together a wide range of policy-makers, academics and practitioners to analyse trends in health reform, drawing on experience from across Europe to illuminate policy issues. Th e European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies is a partnership between the World Health Organization Regional Offi ce for Europe, the Governments of Belgium, Finland, Norway, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, the Veneto Region of Italy, the European Investment Bank, the World Bank, the London School of Economics and Political Science and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Financing health care in the European Union Challenges and policy responses Sarah Thomson Thomas Foubister Elias Mossialos This study was requested and fi nanced by the European Parliament’s Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (EMPL). Keywords: FINANCING, HEALTH DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE – economics HEALTH CARE COSTS HEALTH CARE REFORM EUROPEAN UNION © World Health Organization 2009, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies All rights reserved. Th e European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Address requests about publications to: Publications, WHO Regional Offi ce for Europe, Scherfi gsvej 8, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Offi ce web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
    [Show full text]