1 NATIONAL Ngos NETWORK for CIVIL COURT WATCH Quarterly

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 NATIONAL Ngos NETWORK for CIVIL COURT WATCH Quarterly NATIONAL NGOs NETWORK FOR CIVIL COURT WATCH Quarterly analytical report of civil court watch of regional courts in Pleven, Levski, Cherven bryag and Gabrovo Observation period: December 2010-February 2011 Project “Justice reach to people” The project is funded by America for Bulgaria Foundation THE PROJECT IS CARRIED OUT WITH THE SUPPORT OF SUPREME JUDICIAL COUNCIL March 2011 Razgrad 1 We want to thank to: Special thanks to Team America for Bulgaria Foundation which supported the idea of the project and all the time encourage us. We thank to all participants in the civil court watch, which showed both civil activity and high professionalism in the collection of data and the shaping of the primary reports. Special thanks to all representatives of the judicial authority in four legal areas, which fully cooperated us and have provided us valuable advices for our conclusions and recommendations: Diana Petrakieva – Chairman of District Court - Gabrovo, Palmira Atanasova - Chairman of Regional Court - Levski, Daniela Dilova – Chairman of the Regional Court - Pleven, Hristo Parvanov - Chairman of Regional Court – Cherven bryag. Valuable assistance to us proved the judicial administrators and administrative secretaries, which provided suitable conditions for organizing civil court watch. Authors: Georgi Milkov – NGOs Centre in Razgrad Konstantin Petrov – NGOs Centre in Razgrad Stoyanka Nedelcheva - NGOs Centre in Razgrad Katia Bojikova - NCC "Lik", Pleven Valentina Sofronieva - NPLE "Hope 2002",Levski Paunka Tsvetkova – Chitalishte “Light", Cherven bryag Elena Nazarova – Citalishte "Aprilov-Palauzov 1861", Gabrovo Pleven: Daniel Jonkov - civil observer, Svetoslav Ivanov – civil observer Lubov Kirilova- expert, Maya Mironova-expert. Levski: Ilka Dicheva - observer, Emilia Kondova - observer, Zoya Licheva - expert, Ivelina Fzdravkova - expert. Cherven bryag: Vili Valov - observer, Cvetan Petkov - observer, Emilia Dimova - expert, Petyo Kostov - expert. Gabrovo: Vladislava Hristova - observer; Radka Baltova - expert; Nikolay Bankovski – expert. Razgrad: experts of the team of the project – Diana Parvanova, Dimo Borisov, Elin Harizanov, Nadejda Vassileva, Stella Kovacheva. This publication is published within the project “Justice reach to people” implemented by NGOs Center in Razgrad and the National NGO Network for Civil Court Watch in Bulgaria. Published ascertainment, conclusions and recommendations shall in no way engage the America for Bulgaria Foundation. 2 1. First Part 1.1 Summary of the report The report contains the results of civil court watch, held during the months of December 2010, January and February 2011 in Regional courts in Gabrovo, Levski, Pleven and Cherven bryag. Monitoring is carried out by a team of National NGOs network for Civil Court Watch within the framework of the project "Justice, near people", funded by the America for Bulgaria Foundation. The main task of the civil court watch was to track impression, which allow citizens in the application of new and amended laws and access of vulnerable groups to justice. The subject of civil court watch is Code of Ethical Behavior for Bulgarian magistrates, which they must follow, as well as the presence or absence of conflict of interests of employees of the Themis within the judicial system. In the course of civil court watch are tracked 122 judicial matters, of which 60 criminal and 62 civil. Civil court watch was focused on processes, led by Law on Protection from Domestic Violence, Law on Child Protection, the Family Code, as well as on criminal proceedings for crimes of common and private nature. Matters to be observed include cases in LAPH. In them is traced the rapid production, which should be handled and imposed penalties which sometimes conflict with Community law and are in violation of civil rights. The subject of civil court watch is existing in the courts and mechanisms which ensure publicity, accountability and transparency of the activities of the Court, as well as its openness and accessibility for people. Special attention is given to the ability of vulnerable groups to obtain guaranteed access to the services of the judicial system, as well as whether there are direct physical facilities for their move to and in court premises. The report contains the findings of the work of the Juror. Tracked are principles for their selection, control of the work and their usage; opportunities for training; the manner of payment of their labour; the system for the selection of citizens – panelists entrusted by law to assist judges to judge the most fair. The team of observers and experts is subject of special study status of relationships and commitments between the representatives of the judicial system in various legal areas. Examined are the preconditions for possible conflicts of interest. Comment and public assessment are subject and facts become publicly known through publications in the media, with which the team considered that violates the Code of Ethical Behavior for Bulgarian magistrates. The team of civil court watch is traced and changes in the judicial practice of the courts in relation to established data of civil court watch of 2006-2008. 3 1.2. The degree of progress Paste the assessments we have managed, that the assessment under "Good progress" receive courts, which, according to us have serious problems in its work on the organization and conduct of judicial processes. Evaluation "Very good progress" place for a very good application of laws and very good administration. Evaluation "Exceptional progress" is set when the Court establishes and applies the new model practices, which have been approved by the Supreme Judicial Council and the Minister of justice. Gabrovo Levski Pleven Cherven bryag Application of new laws Very good Very Very Good progress good good progress progress progress Civic Procedure Code Very good Very Very Very progress good good good progress progress progress Penal Procedure Code Very good Very Very Very progress good good good progress progress progress Judiciary Law Very good Very Very Good progress good good progress progress progress Law on Child Protection - Very Very Very good good good progress progress progress Law on Protection from Domestic Violence Very good - Very Very progress good good progress progress Law for Prevention and Identifying the Conflicts Very good Very Very Very of Interests progress good good good progress progress progress Code of Ethical Behavior for Bulgarian Very good Very Very Very magistrates progress good good good progress progress progress Law Against Petty Hooliganism Very good Very Very Very progress good good good progress progress progress Access of vulnerable groups to justice Good Very Very Good progress good good progress progress progress Architectural internal and external environment Very good Very Good Good of the buildings — the accessibility of people with progress good progress progress permanent physical disability progress Accessibility and adequacy of judicial procedures Good Very Very Good against representatives of vulnerable groups ,not progress good good progress able to express clearly their statements progress progress Accessibility and adequacy of judicial procedures Good Very Very Good 4 against representatives of vulnerable groups ,not progress good good progress able to express clearly their statements progress progress Level of access to information for people with Good Very Good Good disabilities on the Court, its activities, staff, progress good progress progress administration, legal matters, etc. progress Activity of Juror No No No No progress progress progress progress Ethical Behavior for Bulgarian magistrates Good Good Good Good progress progress progress progress Publicity and awareness on the activities of the Good Very Very Good Court progress good good progress progress progress 3. Third Part 3.1 General assessment of the courts on the application of new and amended laws. The assessment reflects the cross-sectional observed four regional courts on the main indicators of civil court watch. The focus of the evaluation are challenges in judicial activity, which we believe are the subject of the near future. Publicity and transparency in the work, the management of the buildings are especially important for the access of citizens to justice. We suggest the administrative managers to plan their actions for the next three years and to submit to the Supreme Judicial Council and Minister of Justice requests for budgets to ensure that intentions for reconstruction and modernization of the courts. Regional Court - Gabrovo shows very good progress. In most cases, civil matters concluded in one court hearing and exceptionally be postponed for second. Establish monitoring procedures PPC are complied with. Affairs begin exactly at the announced time, the line in the Hall be maintained with ease, work is competently and impartially. The judges explain the rights of the parties to the proceedings. In cases of JL will delay on the part of judges. Observed are cases in which lawyers are without robes, and judges have been at remote. Judicial proceedings shall be distributed at random with the help of provided by SJC software that ensure their even distribution. When examining the minutes of these meetings has been established that they are prepared in detail within three days, and most of the judicial decisions are announced and published before the prescribed period of one month. There is good coordination between the institutions in the implementation of
Recommended publications
  • Navigation Map of Bulgaria Including Offroadmap by Offroad-Bulgaria.Com Version 2021 Q1
    Navigation Map of Bulgaria Including OFFRoadMap by OFFRoad-Bulgaria.com Version 2021 Q2 The purpose of this map is to provide accessible, accurate and up-to-date information for your GPS devices. Despite all efforts made by the creators to achieve this goal, the roads and the data included in this digital map are intended to be used as guidance only and should not be used solely for navigation. The creators of this map make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the map data. In no event will the creators of this map be liable for any damages whatsoever, including but not limited to loss of revenue or profit, lost or damaged data, and expenses, arising in any way from or consequential upon the use of, or the inability to use this digital map. Contents: - Registering your map - Usage details - OFRM Geotrade 2021 Q2 variants - Coverage >>>>> REGISTRATION <<<<< To register your OFRM Geotrade map, please visit out website www.karta.bg. Click on “Create profile” in the top right corner of the screen and create your personal account. When done, the Support page will load automatically. Click on the button “Register OFRM Geotrade” and enter the 25-symbol map serial number and GPS model to activate your map’s update subscription (if your map includes one). To obtain the 25-symbol serial number, connect your GPS device to your computer via USB cable. If you have a GPS device with preloaded OFRM map, you will find the serial number in file “serial.txt” in the root folder of your device’s base memory or in the file “gmapsupp.unl” in folder “Garmin” (or folder “Map” on the newer models of the nüvi series and the new Drive series) of your device’s base memory.
    [Show full text]
  • 7563/11 HGN/Tt 1 DG H 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 10 March 2011 THE EUROPEAN UNION 7563/11 COPEN 44 EJN 20 EUROJUST 29 NOTE from: Bulgarian Permanent Representation to Delegations Subject: Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders – the Republic of Bulgaria Delegations will find enclosed the notification made by Bulgaria in relation to the abovementioned framework decision. _______________ 7563/11 HGN/tt 1 DG H 2B EN DECLARATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS BY THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 3, ARTICLE 7(5) AND ARTICLE 19 OF COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2006/783/JHA OF 6 OCTOBER 2006 ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION TO CONFISCATION ORDERS The Republic of Bulgaria hereby notifies the General Secretariat of the Council of the following declarations and notifications pursuant to Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders and the Law on the recognition, execution and transmission of decisions on confiscation or seizure and decisions on the enforcement of financial penalties adopted by the National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria on 11 February 2010 (published in the State Journal of the Republic of Bulgaria No 15 of 23 February 2010), which transposes the abovementioned Framework Decision into the law of the Republic of Bulgaria. 1) Notification pursuant to Article 3 of Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA (determination of the competent authorities): (а) When the Republic of Bulgaria is the executing State: The competent authorities with regard to the recognition of confiscation or seizure orders shall be the provincial courts and Sofia City Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
    [Show full text]
  • Local Initiatives in the Period 1999 – 2000
    LOCAL INITIATIVES IN THE PERIOD 1999 2000 SOFIA DECEMBER 1999 LOCAL INITIATIVES IN THE PERIOD 1999 - 2000 2 CONTENTS 1. PRINCIPLES OF COOPERATION WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT ................................................................. 3 2. SPHERES AND FORMS OF COOPERATION ............ 4 3. LOCAL PARTNERS OF COALITION 2000 .................. 7 4. INTERACTION WITH OTHER NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS AND INITIATIVES .............................................................. 8 LOCAL INITIATIVES IN THE PERIOD 1999 - 2000 3 1. PRINCIPLES OF COOPERATION WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT Coalition 2000 will continue its activities on both national and regional/ local level. Realizing that administrative corruption is the kind citizens encounter in their everyday lives, the Coalition will place special empha- sis on interaction with the representatives of local government and the other municipal agencies for enhancing the transparency in the sphere of public services. The common interests of civil society and local govern- ment allow expanding the scope of the cooperation initiated in the pilot stage of the local projects. One precondition for successful advancement in this direction is fostering a climate of dialogue and trust between the two sectors. This implies consistent efforts by both sides, as well as profes- sionalism and resolve. Openness and Transparency of Public Administration The information the public is entitled to, either by law or by the force of the existing statutes and regulations, is often left behind the curtain of the discretion of public officials. Nor is there any sufficiently sustained civil effort to lift this curtain and shed light on the gray zones of the decision- making mechanisms. The task should therefore be to launch a continuous dialogue between public institutions and civil organizations for the attain- ment of European standards of openness and accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Октомври 2016 Х-Л Балкан 1 7 Wim Velickovsk
    -ти 3 турнир за купа "Плевен XXI" 7 - 9 Октомври 2016 х-л БАЛКАН SNo. БГ FIDE FED Club т. БГ +/- FIDE +/- Ниво на постижение 1 7 WIM VELICKOVSKI-NEJKOVIC Maja 2106 SRB BAS Beograd 6 26,3 24 2242 2 5 DERESHKI Dario 2112 2126 BUL "Pleven XXI" Pleven 5,5 22,1 19 2216 3 12 мс ARNAUDOV Petar D. 2060 2027 BUL "Abritus" Razgrad 5,5 32,7 37 2193 4 1 мс TSEKOV Svetozar 2292 2198 BUL "Spartak Pleven XXI" Pleven 5,5 -6,9 -2 2071 5 20 KRASTEVA Beloslava 1910 1949 BUL "Spartak Pleven XXI" Pleven 5,5 52,2 73 2081 6 3 мс BOCHEV Krasimir 2175 2137 BUL "Vratsa" Vratsa 5 -3,3 -5 2069 7 17 VALOV Vesko 1989 1989 BUL "Lovech" Lovech 5 9,6 12 1888 8 19 VASILEV Vergil 1992 1956 BUL "Lovech" Lovech 5 -4,8 -4 1817 9 6 KHUDOVEKOV Stanislav 2100 2116 RUS Smolensk 4,5 -0,8 -12 2013 10 23 TODOROV Kaloyan 1979 1928 BUL "Chess Bomb" Plovdiv 4,5 5,3 30 1879 11 16 MITEV Valentin 2074 1992 BUL "Pleven XXI" Pleven 4,5 -1,9 13 1970 12 2 мс MISHEV Liubomir 2192 2145 BUL "Lokomotiv" Plovdiv 4,5 -17,9 -25 1982 13 4 мс MITREV Emil 2122 2129 BUL "Radetski" Kozloduy 4,5 -14,9 -22 1903 14 26 KIRILOV Ivaylo 2055 1847 BUL "Plovdiv" Plovdiv 4,5 -10,3 8 1774 15 13 ANTOV Anton 1862 2027 BUL "Radetski" Kozloduy 4,5 3,3 -33 1784 16 28 ZDRAVKOVIC Dragan S 1830 SRB "Veteran" Сврљиг 4,5 31,8 20 1868 17 10 BOZOV Ahmet 2158 2061 BUL "Lovech" Lovech 4 -19,7 -16 1928 18 18 DYULGEROV Volen 2019 1988 BUL "Mihail Tal" Cherven Bryag 4 17,4 36 2024 19 11 DYAKOV Martin 2169 2034 BUL "Pleven XXI" Pleven 4 -20,8 -9 1941 20 15 NAYDENOV Nayden 2004 1996 BUL "Silistra" Silistra 4 1,8 -7 1909 21 31 IGNATOV Georgi 1875 1690 BUL "Vratsa" Vratsa 4 30,7 92 1958 22 32 BABATOV Martin 1697 1634 BUL Gabrovo 4 7,5 14 1718 23 36 PASKALEV Vasil 1614 1590 GER Usv Halle 4 46,6 47 1764 24 24 TSVETANOV David 1979 1923 BUL "Pleven XXI" Pleven 4 -14,7 -18 1660 25 27 STOILOV Aleksandar 1905 1842 BUL "Pleven XXI" Pleven 4 -21,2 -21 1615 26 21 RADEV Rumen Ang.
    [Show full text]
  • Remains from Bulgaria
    C. R. Palevol 9 (2010) 163–169 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Comptes Rendus Palevol www.sciencedirect.com Systematic palaeontology (Vertebrate palaeontology) Latest Cretaceous hadrosauroid (Dinosauria: Ornithopoda) remains from Bulgaria Restes d’hadrosauroïdes (Dinosauria : Ornithopoda) du Crétacé terminal de Bulgarie Pascal Godefroit a,∗, Neda Motchurova-Dekova b,1 a Institut royal des sciences naturelles de Belgique, 29, rue Vautier, 1000 Bruxelles, Belgium b National Museum of Natural History, 1, Tsar Osvoboditel boulevard, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria article info abstract Article history: Disarticulated dinosaur bones have been discovered in a fossiliferous lens in the Labirinta Received 5 January 2010 Cave, southwest of the town of Cherven Bryag, in NW Bulgaria. This cave is formed within Accepted after revision 5 May 2010 marine limestones belonging to the Kajlâka Formation of Latest Cretaceous age. Associated Available online 17 July 2010 fossils and Sr isotopy suggest that the fossiliferous sediments belong to the uppermost part of the Upper Maastrichtian. The dinosaur bones discovered in this lens include the distal Presented by Philippe Taquet portion of a left femur, a right tibia, the proximal part of a right fibula, a left metatarsal II, the second or third phalanx of a left pedal digit IV, the proximal end of a second metacarpal, Keywords: and a caudal centrum. All the bones undoubtedly belong to ornithopod dinosaurs and more Latest Maastrichtian Hadrosauroidea accurately to representatives of the hadrosauroid clade. All belong to small-sized individu- Dinosauria als, although it cannot be assessed whether they belong to juveniles or small-sized adults, Bulgaria pending histological analyses. Hadrosauroid remains have already been discovered in Late Taphonomy Maastrichtian marine sediments from western, central and eastern Europe, reflecting the Marine sediments abundance of these dinosaurs in correlative continental deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Program Democracy
    Democracy Network Program DemNet II: Building Civil Society in Bulgaria Final Report Democracy Network Program DemNet II: Building Civil Society in Bulgaria 1998-2002 FINAL REPORT TO THE U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Cooperative Agreement No. 181-A-00-98-00320-00 Institute for Sustainable Communities 535 Stone Cutters Way, Montpelier, VT 05602 USA Phone 802-229-2900 | Fax 802-229-2919 [email protected] | www.iscvt.org April 2003 Photos, front and back inside covers: Bulgarian landscapes; next page: DemNet-supported activities of SO partners and NGOs working for positive change in Bulgaria. Table of Contents I. Executive Summary • 6 II. The Context • 8 III. Program Design & Goals • 9 IV. Strengthening the Capacity of SO Partners • 11 • SELECTING SUPPORT ORGANIZATION PARTNERS • ORGANIZATIONAL STRENGTHENING • DEEPENING PROGRAM IMPACT • KEY OUTCOMES IN DEMNET’S FUNCTIONAL AREAS V. SO Partner Performance Stories • 22 VI. Supporting a Vibrant NGO Sector & Strengthening Civil Society in Bulgaria • 24 • TARGETING UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS & IMPROVING SOCIAL SAFETY NETS • CREATING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY • NETWORKING & COALITION BUILDING FOR SUPPORT & SUSTAINABILITY • STRENGTHENING OUTREACH & PUBLIC RELATIONS • INCREASING CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN POLICY DIALOGUE VII. Lessons Learned • 27 VIII. Conclusion • 29 IX. Attachments A: DEMNET SO PARTNER PUBLICATION B: SO PARTNER SUMMARIES C: ORGANIZATIONAL STRENGTHENING & PERFORMANCE MONITORING COMPONENTS D: SERVICE QUALITY REVIEW REPORT E: DONOR SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY F: ENGAGE INITIATIVE REPORT G: TRAVEL NOTES PUBLICATION (ENGAGE INITIATIVE) H: VOICES FOR CHANGE PUBLICATION I: ADVOCACY INITIATIVE REPORT J: LEADING LIGHTS PUBLICATION K: SUMMARY OF NGO GRANTEES L: SENSE OF EMPOWERMENT VIDEO Acknowledgements The success of any project is in the hands of many people—the SO partners, the capable and dedicated ISC staff in Bulgaria, many excellent consultants who supported the program, and the Bulgaria USAID mission that provided sound support and counsel at critical junctures.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste
    Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Develonment Europe and Central Asia Region 32051 BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION PriorityPublic Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste *t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized IC- - ; s - o Fk - L - -. Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized May 2004 - "Wo BULGARIA ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste May 2004 Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Europe and Central Asia Region Report No. 27770 - BUL Thefindings, interpretationsand conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Coverphoto is kindly provided by the external communication office of the World Bank County Office in Bulgaria. The report is printed on 30% post consumer recycledpaper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................... i Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................... ii Summary ..................................................................... iiM Introduction.iii Wastewater.iv InstitutionalIssues .xvi Recommendations........... xvii Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Part I: The Strategic Settings for
    [Show full text]
  • ANALYSIS of the CHILD PROTECTION SYSTEM in BULGARIA © UNICEF/UNI154434/Pirozzi
    ANALYSIS OF THE CHILD PROTECTION SYSTEM IN BULGARIA © UNICEF/UNI154434/Pirozzi Final report October 2019 This report has been prepared with the financial assistance of UNICEF in Bulgaria under the Contract LRPS- 2018- 9140553 dated 19 of September 2018. The views expressed herein are those of the consultants and therefore in no way reflect the of- ficial opinion of UNICEF. The research was carried out by a consortium of the companies Fresno, the Right Link and PMG Analytics. The research had been coordinated by Milena Harizanova, Daniela Koleva and Dessislava Encheva from the UNICEF office in Sofia, Bulgaria. Elaborated with the technical assistance of Authors. José Manuel Fresno (Team Leader) Roberta Cecchetti (International Child Protection Expert) Philip Gounev (Public Management Expert) Martin Gramatikov (Legal Expert) Slavyanka Ivanova (Field Research Coordinator) Stefan Meyer (Research Coordination) Skye Bain (Research assistance and quality assurance) Maria Karayotova (Research assistance) Greta Ivanova Tsekova (Research assistance) Table of Content Abreviations ............................................................................................................................ 3 Glossary ................................................................................................................................. 5 Executive Summary................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Energy 1/73 Fifth
    REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT ON BULGARIA’S PROGRESS IN THE PROMOTION AND USE OF ENERGY FROM RENEWABLE SOURCES Drafted in accordance with Article 22(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources on the basis of the model for Member State progress reports set out in Directive 2009/28/EC December 2019 1/73 REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS USED ..................................................................................................................................4 UNITS OF MEASUREMENT ............................................................................................................................5 1. Shares (sectoral and overall) and actual consumption of energy from renewable sources in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018) (Article 22(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ........................................................................6 2. Measures taken in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018) and/or planned at national level to promote the growth of energy from renewable sources, taking into account the indicative trajectory for achieving the national RES targets as outlined in your National Renewable Energy Action Plan. (Article 22(1)(a) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.a Please describe the support schemes and other measures currently in place that are applied to promote energy from renewable sources and report on any developments in the measures used with respect to those set out in your National Renewable Energy Action Plan (Article 22(1)(b) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ..................... 18 2.b Please describe the measures in ensuring the transmission and distribution of electricity produced from renewable energy sources and in improving the regulatory framework for bearing and sharing of costs related to grid connections and grid reinforcements (for accepting greater loads).
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Geography and Sustainable Regional Development in Bulgaria: Case Study of NorthWest Bulgaria and Vidin District
    Geographica Timisiensis, vol. 19, nr. 1, 2010 (pp. 155-162) ● ELECTORAL GEOGRAPHY AND SUSTAINABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BULGARIA: CASE STUDY OF NORTH-WEST BULGARIA AND VIDIN DISTRICT Marin ROUSSEV Faculty of Geology and Geography, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria Abstract : The transition to sustainable development depends on political factors, concerning regional disproportions, principles of regional policy and local self-government. They are dependent on the electoral behavioral models in society. The change of social conditions in Bulgaria demands an actualization of research methods and indicators so that territorial division is optimized. Electoral geography has a great potential for such actualization. Main operative statistical units in this study are the administrative regions and municipalities as well as their macroelectoral compounding. This approach is combined with the correlative-typological potential of the “geographic passport” method. It is used for the derivation of traditional electoral types of administrative units and macroelectoral regions. Their characteristics are distinguished by clearly expressed dependencies between natural and social features on the one hand and electoral behavioral models, on the other hand. The North- West region is characterized by an unfavorable combination of natural potential and negative social tendencies – broken age structure, negative migration balance, low economic activity and agricultural specialization. This economic basis is combined with a left political orientation. The most typical example for this is the Vidin district. During the last 2-3 years there are social tendencies which lead to the assumption that Bulgaria is entering a new electoral cycle that is to replace the post communist governmental model of the last two decades.
    [Show full text]