DOCSLIB.ORG

Ev20n1p53.Pdf (663.1Kb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ev20n1p53.Pdf (663.1Kb) SEROLOGIC SCREENING FOR CYTOMEGALOVIRUS, RUBELLA VIRUS, HERPESSIMPLEX VIRUS, HEPATITIS B VIRUS, AND Z-DXOl?~snIlA GONDII IN TWO URBAN POPULATIONS OF PREGNANT WOMEN IN CHILE1 Pablo Vzlzl;2 Jorge Toves-Pereyra, 3 Sergio Stagno, 4 Francisco Gonzhfez,’ Enrique Donoso, G Chades A. Allford, 7 Zimara Hirsch, 8 and Luk Rodtiguezg I NTRODUCTION these agents represent naturally acquired infections. There are only a few reports Although the prevalence of concerning the epidemiology of congeni- congenital and perinatal infections is tal and perinatal infections in Chile (l- high, however, it is.unclear whether their $&In general, these reports show that incidence during the childbearing years the prevalences of infection with most of (and hence their potential to cause fetal the causative agents are high and that disease) is different from that observed in most infections are acquired at an early communities such as those in developed age. Since vaccinations against cytomeg- countries where lower prevalences are the alovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus rule. Therefore, in order to help assess (HSV), and Toxopl’asma gondii have not the importance of CMV, HSV, rubella, yet been introduced, high prevalences of HBV, and ToxopLasmagondii as causesof z 2 < ’ This article is also being published in Spanish in the 4 Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama. Bir- 2 BoLefin de /a Oficina Sanitankz Panameticana, 99(5), mingham. Alabama, United States. % 1985. The work reported here was supported by Grant s Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Sotero de1 x ‘4 LHZ503Q from the Pan American Health Organita- Rio Hospital, Puente Alto, Chile. u 6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. School of tion and the Kellogg Foundation, by Grant HD-10699 2 from the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Medicine, Catholic University, Santiago, Chile. Human Development, by the Pontifical Catholic LJni- ’ Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama. 2 versity of Chile, and by the Southeastern Metropolitan 8 Department OfPediatrics, School of Medicine, Catholic Health Service of Santiago, Chile. University, Santiago, Chile. 2 a Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Catholic ” Central Laboratory, School of Medicine, Catholic Uni- n, University, Santiago, Chile. versity. Santiago, Chile. ’ Department ofpediatrics, School of Medicine, Catholic University, Santiago, Chile. 53 perinatal infections, we determined the counted for approximately 5% of all rate of susceptibility to these infections pregnancies seen at area public health during pregnancy among women of both clinics in one year. low and middle socioeconomic status in The 372 middle-income Santiago, Chile. The report presented women in the study population were en- here indicates the prevalences of these in- rolled at the obstetrics clinic of the Hos- fections early in gestation and compares pital of the Catholic University of Chile the results with other results obtained ( Universidad Catdica de Ck’e). All of from the same population and from these women were white, their mean age other populations in other countries. was 27.2 years, and their mean gesta- tional age at enrollment was 14 weeks. This population accounted for nearly 20% of all pregnant women seen at the M A’I’ERIALS obstetric clinic in one year. AND METHODS Serum samples obtained at enrollment from all of the subjects were The study population con- stored at - 20°C until tested by one of sisted of 833 pregnant women residing in us (P.V.) at the virology laboratory at the Santiago, Chile, who were enrolled in University of Alabama in Birmingham. the study between January and March of IgG-class antibodies against CMV, HSV I 1983, at their first or second prenatal and HSV II, rubella virus, hepatitis B vi- clinic visit. The age distribution of the rus, and Toxoplasma go&ii were assessed study population, by income group, is using commercially available enzyme- shown in Table 1. linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) kits. The 461 low-income women That is, serum samples were assayed on in this population, all white, were drawn microtiter plates in accordance with the from three different public health clinics method recommended by the manufac- operated for beneficiaries of the National turer of the “Cytomegalisa,” “Herpe- Health Service in the southeast area of l&a,” “Rubelisa,” and “Toxoelisa” kits Santiago; their mean age was 24.5 years (M.A. Bioproducts, Wakersville, Mary- and their mean gestational age at enroll- land, USA). The anti-HBc antibodies ment was 18 weeks. This population ac- were also determined by a commercially available ELISA (Corzyme, Abbott Labo- ratories). The samples that were positive for anti-HBc were subsequently tested b TABLE1. Distributionof the study population,by income for surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBe an- and age groups. 3 tigen (HBeAg) by another ELISA (aus- zime II, Abbott HBe, Abbott Laborato- 4 Middle-income Low-income z. ries). All these assaysare routinely done group group % Age group in our laboratory. .g (in years) No. % No. % 9, %4 16-20<15 -28 - 7.5 12221 26.54.6 s 21-2526-30 132118 35.531.7 11996 25.820.8 a, 31-35 61 16.4 68 14.7 136 33 8.9 35 7.6 54 Total 372 100 461 100 In each run we included ap- cal comparisons were analyzed by the propriate positive and negative controls. Chi square test. Because the Herpelisa kit used to test an- tibodies to HSV I and II had not been li- censed by the U.S. Food and Drug Ad- ministration, we felt it was necessary to RESULTS verify that test’s specificity. Dr. A. Nah- Among pregnant women mias of Emory University in Atlanta, from the lower of the two socioeconomic Georgia, generously provided us with 30 groups, the rate of seropositivity was serum specimens known to contain ei- 96.5% for CMV, 97.2% for HSV, 94.8% ther type I or type II antibodies (deter- for rubella, 68.2 % for Toxoplasma gon- mined. by testing them against specific dii, and 1.4% for HBV, These rates dif- HSV I and II glycoproteins). We found fered significantly from somewhat lower that specimens containing HSV I anti- rates found for the group of women with bodies had a high rate of cross-reactivity intermediate socioeconomic status in the with the HSV type II antigen used in the casesof Ch4V,HSV, and ToxopZasmagon- Herpelisa test. (HSV type II antibodies dii (Table 2). did not cross-react with HSV type I anti- gen.) Because of this cross-reactivity, we have reported our results without distin- guishing between types I and II. Statisti- TABLE2. Resultsobtained from ELISAtesting of sera tom two differ- ent populations of pregnant women in Chile for exposure to five agents causing congenital and perinafal disease (cnw=cytomega- lovirus; HSV= herpL!Ssimplex virus; and HBV= hepatitis B virus). No. of pregnant women in group Socioeconomic background of No. No. % Agent populationgroup tested positive positive CMV Low 456b 440 963 t Middle 370b 321 86.8a Rubella Low 461 437 94.8 virus t Middle 372 351 94.4 HSV . Low 458b 445 97.2a i Middle 37P 326 87.ga Toxoplasma Low 449b 306 68.2a gondii I Middle 370b 179 48.4a HEV Low 513c 7 1.4 L Middle 358 5 1.4 a The difference between the results for the two scciceconomic groups is statistically significant (p< 0.001). b Seven of the study subjects were not tested far CMV,four were nol tested for HN, and 14 were not tested for Toxp/asma goncb. c In addition to sera from study subjects. sera from 52 other low-income women were tested for HENThe serum samples tested were obtainedfrom pregnantwomen coming to the three participating clmics during the study period. Within the middle-class pop- TABLE 3. Indicated prevalencesof three HBV markers, ulation group, none of five samples test- (anti-HE& HBsAg, and HBeAg)among the 871 pregnant ing positively for anti-HBc were positive women participating in the study. for HBsAg or HBeAg. However, of seven No. of Positivesera samples testing positively for anti-HBc in subjects the lower-class population group, one Marker tested No. % was positive for HBsAg and two were Anti-HBc 871 12a 1.4 positive for both HBsAg and HBeAg. HBsAg 871 0.34 The rate of HBsAg carriers among the to- HBeAg 871 0.22 tal population studied thus appeared to a FM of these subjects came from the mlddle-class group and seven be 0.34 % (Table 3). came from the lower-class group. The age distributions of sero- b The sera posfilve for HBsAg and HEeAg came from among the 12 test- ing positively for antr-HBc Only these 12 sera were tested for HEsAg and negative women within both popula- HE&g. tions for CMV, HSV, rubella, and Toxo- @sma gondii are shown in Figure 1. As LEGEND A. Cytomegalovirus 8. Herpes simplex virus * P< 0.025 30 30 ** P< 0.010 9 *** P<O.O50 ‘... I Cl5 16-20 21-25 26.30 31-35 236 <I5 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 236 Age (years) Age (years) 70 D. Toxoplasma gondii C. Rubella virus 60 ,,/ ,m -/I , I I I I I <,5 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 a36 $15 16-20 21.25 26-30 31-35 236 Age (years) Age (years) FIGURE1. Percentagesof the two Santiagostudy populatfonsresponding negativelyto ELISA serologictesting for IgG antibodiesto cytomegalovirus,herpes simplex virus, rubella virus, and Toxoplasmago&i, by age group. may been seen, the number of women positive rates (97.5% and 87.5 %, re- susceptible to CMV, HSV, and Toxop~usma spectively). These rates are similar to gondii declined notably with advancing those reported from communities in Ja- age. pan (7)) Guatemala (8), Barbados (9), Saint Lucia (1 Q), and Tanzania (11) , and higher than those reported from the United States (I, 15, and 18) and Great D ISCUSSION Britain (12).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mmrv Vaccine
    VACCINE INFORMATION STATEMENT (Measles, Mumps, Many Vaccine Information Statements are available in Spanish and other languages. MMRV Vaccine Rubella and See www.immunize.org/vis Varicella) Hojas de información sobre vacunas están disponibles en español y en muchos otros What You Need to Know idiomas. Visite www.immunize.org/vis These are recommended ages. But children can get the Measles, Mumps, Rubella and second dose up through 12 years as long as it is at least 1 Varicella 3 months after the first dose. Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella (chickenpox) can be serious diseases: Children may also get these vaccines as 2 separate shots: MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) and Measles varicella vaccines. • Causes rash, cough, runny nose, eye irritation, fever. • Can lead to ear infection, pneumonia, seizures, brain 1 Shot (MMRV) or 2 Shots (MMR & Varicella)? damage, and death. • Both options give the same protection. Mumps • One less shot with MMRV. • Causes fever, headache, swollen glands. • Children who got the first dose as MMRV have • Can lead to deafness, meningitis (infection of the brain had more fevers and fever-related seizures (about and spinal cord covering), infection of the pancreas, 1 in 1,250) than children who got the first dose as painful swelling of the testicles or ovaries, and, rarely, separate shots of MMR and varicella vaccines on death. the same day (about 1 in 2,500). Rubella (German Measles) Your doctor can give you more information, • Causes rash and mild fever; and can cause arthritis, including the Vaccine Information Statements for (mostly in women). MMR and Varicella vaccines.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Tetracore Orthopox Biothreat® Antigen Detection Assay
    Journal of Virological Methods 187 (2013) 37–42 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Virological Methods jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jviromet ® Evaluation of the Tetracore Orthopox BioThreat antigen detection assay using laboratory grown orthopoxviruses and rash illness clinical specimens a,∗ b a a a Michael B. Townsend , Adam MacNeil , Mary G. Reynolds , Christine M. Hughes , Victoria A. Olson , a a Inger K. Damon , Kevin L. Karem a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop G-06, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States b Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Global Immunization Division, CGH, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop G-06, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States a b s t r a c t ® Article history: The commercially available Orthopox BioThreat Alert assay for orthopoxvirus (OPV) detection is piloted. Received 5 December 2011 This antibody-based lateral-flow assay labels and captures OPV viral agents to detect their presence. Serial Received in revised form 23 August 2012 dilutions of cultured Vaccinia virus (VACV) and Monkeypox virus (MPXV) were used to evaluate the sensi- Accepted 30 August 2012 tivity of the Tetracore assay by visual and quantitative determinations; specificity was assessed using a Available online 5 September 2012 small but diverse set of diagnostically relevant blinded samples from viral lesions submitted for routine ® OPV diagnostic testing. The BioThreat Alert assay reproducibly detected samples at concentrations of Keywords: 7 6 10 pfu/ml for VACV and MPXV and positively identified samples containing 10 pfu/ml in 4 of 7 inde- Monkeypox Orthopoxvirus pendent experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Seroprevalence of TORCH Infections in Children
    Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal Volume 17, Issue 1, January 2018 Original Article Seroprevalence of TORCH Infections in Children Sanjoy Kanti Biswas1* Abstract 2 Md. Badruddoza Background : The acronym “TORCH” was introduced to highlight a group of Nahid Sultana1 pathogens that cause a congenital and perinatal infections: Toxoplasma gondi, rubella virus, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV). These pathogens are often associated with congenital anomalies. Congenital malformations 1 Department of Microbiology have a direct impact on the family. This study was undertaken to detect the Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Chittagong, Bangladesh. serological evidence of TORCH infections in children, by establishing the presence of specific IgM antibodies. Methods: During the period 1st June 2016 to 30th May 2 Department of Paediatrics 2017, 58 suspected TORCH infection cases were included from Paediatrics Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Chittagong, Bangladesh. Department of CMOSH for TORCH antibody detection. The children were in the age of 0 day to 1 year with an average age of 3.3±2.59 months. The serum samples were tested forIgM and IgG antibodies against TORCH agents by using enzyme linked immunoassay method (ELISA). Results: Among the 58 children, seropositivity was found in 55 (94.82%) cases. Of the 55 seropositive cases serological evidence for combination of IgM and IgG with any one of the TORCH agents was detected in 25 (43.10%) and IgG alone was detected in 30 (51.72%) children. IgM/IgG antibody positivity to Toxoplasma, Rubella, CMV and HSV was 21(36.21%), 50(86.21%), 52(89.66%) and 8(13.79%) respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Therapeutics for Epstein–Barr Virus
    molecules Review Novel Therapeutics for Epstein–Barr Virus Graciela Andrei *, Erika Trompet and Robert Snoeck Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; [email protected] (E.T.); [email protected] (R.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-16-321-915 Academic Editor: Stefano Aquaro Received: 15 February 2019; Accepted: 4 March 2019; Published: 12 March 2019 Abstract: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a human γ-herpesvirus that infects up to 95% of the adult population. Primary EBV infection usually occurs during childhood and is generally asymptomatic, though the virus can cause infectious mononucleosis in 35–50% of the cases when infection occurs later in life. EBV infects mainly B-cells and epithelial cells, establishing latency in resting memory B-cells and possibly also in epithelial cells. EBV is recognized as an oncogenic virus but in immunocompetent hosts, EBV reactivation is controlled by the immune response preventing transformation in vivo. Under immunosuppression, regardless of the cause, the immune system can lose control of EBV replication, which may result in the appearance of neoplasms. The primary malignancies related to EBV are B-cell lymphomas and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, which reflects the primary cell targets of viral infection in vivo. Although a number of antivirals were proven to inhibit EBV replication in vitro, they had limited success in the clinic and to date no antiviral drug has been approved for the treatment of EBV infections. We review here the antiviral drugs that have been evaluated in the clinic to treat EBV infections and discuss novel molecules with anti-EBV activity under investigation as well as new strategies to treat EBV-related diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Infection Status of Human Parvovirus B19, Cytomegalovirus and Herpes Simplex Virus-1/2 in Women with First-Trimester Spontaneous
    Gao et al. Virology Journal (2018) 15:74 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-0988-5 RESEARCH Open Access Infection status of human parvovirus B19, cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex Virus- 1/2 in women with first-trimester spontaneous abortions in Chongqing, China Ya-Ling Gao1, Zhan Gao3,4, Miao He3,4* and Pu Liao2* Abstract Background: Infection with Parvovirus B19 (B19V), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Herpes Simplex Virus-1/2 (HSV-1/2) may cause fetal loses including spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal death and non-immune hydrops fetalis. Few comprehensive studies have investigated first-trimester spontaneous abortions caused by virus infections in Chongqing, China. Our study intends to investigate the infection of B19V, CMV and HSV-1/2 in first-trimester spontaneous abortions and the corresponding immune response. Methods: 100 abortion patients aged from 17 to 47 years were included in our study. The plasma samples (100) were analyzed qualitatively for specific IgG/IgM for B19V, CMV and HSV-1/2 (Virion\Serion, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. B19V, CMV and HSV-1/2 DNA were quantification by Real-Time PCR. Results: No specimens were positive for B19V, CMV, and HSV-1/2 DNA. By serology, 30.0%, 95.0%, 92.0% of patients were positive for B19V, CMV and HSV-1/2 IgG respectively, while 2% and 1% for B19V and HSV-1/2 IgM. Conclusion: The low rate of virus DNA and a high proportion of CMV and HSV-1/2 IgG for most major of abortion patients in this study suggest that B19V, CMV and HSV-1/2 may not be the common factor leading to the spontaneous abortion of early pregnancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Measles Diagnostic Tool
    Measles Prodrome and Clinical evolution E Fever (mild to moderate) E Cough E Coryza E Conjunctivitis E Fever spikes as high as 105ºF Koplik’s spots Koplik’s Spots E E Viral enanthem of measles Rash E Erythematous, maculopapular rash which begins on typically starting 1-2 days before the face (often at hairline and behind ears) then spreads to neck/ the rash. Appearance is similar to “grains of salt on a wet background” upper trunk and then to lower trunk and extremities. Evolution and may become less visible as the of rash 1-3 days. Palms and soles rarely involved. maculopapular rash develops. Rash INCUBATION PERIOD Fever, STARTS on face (hairline & cough/coryza/conjunctivitis behind ears), spreads to trunk, Average 8-12 days from exposure to onset (sensitivity to light) and then to thighs/ feet of prodrome symptoms 0 (average interval between exposure to onset rash 14 day [range 7-21 days]) -4 -3 -2 -1 1234 NOT INFECTIOUS higher fever (103°-104°) during this period rash fades in same sequence it appears INFECTIOUS 4 days before rash and 4 days after rash Not Measles Rubella Varicella cervical lymphadenopathy. Highly variable but (Aka German Measles) (Aka Chickenpox) Rash E often maculopapular with Clinical manifestations E Clinical manifestations E Generally mild illness with low- Mild prodrome of fever and malaise multiforme-like lesions and grade fever, malaise, and lymph- may occur one to two days before may resemble scarlet fever. adenopathy (commonly post- rash. Possible low-grade fever. Rash often associated with painful edema hands and feet. auricular and sub-occipital).
    [Show full text]
  • Where Do We Stand After Decades of Studying Human Cytomegalovirus?
    microorganisms Review Where do we Stand after Decades of Studying Human Cytomegalovirus? 1, 2, 1 1 Francesca Gugliesi y, Alessandra Coscia y, Gloria Griffante , Ganna Galitska , Selina Pasquero 1, Camilla Albano 1 and Matteo Biolatti 1,* 1 Laboratory of Pathogenesis of Viral Infections, Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; [email protected] (F.G.); gloria.griff[email protected] (G.G.); [email protected] (G.G.); [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (C.A.) 2 Complex Structure Neonatology Unit, Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 19 March 2020; Accepted: 5 May 2020; Published: 8 May 2020 Abstract: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a linear double-stranded DNA betaherpesvirus belonging to the family of Herpesviridae, is characterized by widespread seroprevalence, ranging between 56% and 94%, strictly dependent on the socioeconomic background of the country being considered. Typically, HCMV causes asymptomatic infection in the immunocompetent population, while in immunocompromised individuals or when transmitted vertically from the mother to the fetus it leads to systemic disease with severe complications and high mortality rate. Following primary infection, HCMV establishes a state of latency primarily in myeloid cells, from which it can be reactivated by various inflammatory stimuli. Several studies have shown that HCMV, despite being a DNA virus, is highly prone to genetic variability that strongly influences its replication and dissemination rates as well as cellular tropism. In this scenario, the few currently available drugs for the treatment of HCMV infections are characterized by high toxicity, poor oral bioavailability, and emerging resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Poxvirus Host-Range and Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells
    ABSTRACT Title: INVESTIGATION OF POXVIRUS HOST-RANGE AND GENE EXPRESSION IN MAMMALIAN CELLS. Jorge David Méndez Ríos, Doctor of Philosophy, 2014. Directed By: Dr. Bernard Moss, Chief, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, NIAID, NIH; Adjunct Professor Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland; Members of the Poxviridae family have been known as human pathogens for centuries. Their impact in society included several epidemics that decimated the population. In the last few centuries, Smallpox was of great concern that led to the development of our modern vaccines. The systematic study of Poxvirus host-range and immunogenicity provided the knowledge to translate those observations into practice. After the global vaccination campaign by the World Health Organization, Smallpox was the first infectious disease to be eradicated. Nevertheless, diseases such as Monkeypox, Molluscum contagiosum, new bioterrorist threads, and the use of poxviruses as vaccines or vectors provided the necessity to further understand the host-range from a molecular level. Here, we take advantage of the newly developed technologies such as 454 pyrosequencing and RNA-Seq to address previously unresolved questions for the field. First, we were able to identify the Erytrhomelagia-related poxvirus (ERPV) 25 years after its isolation in Hubei, China. Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics identified ERPV as an Ectromelia strain closely related to the Ectromelia Naval strain. Second, by using RNA-Seq, the first MOCV in vivo and in vitro transcriptome was generated. New tools have been developed to support future research and for this human pathogen. Finally, deep-sequencing and comparative genomes of several recombinant MVAs (rMVAs) in conjunction with classical virology allowed us to confirm several genes (O1, F5, C17, F11) association to plaque formation in mammalian cell lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpes: a Patient's Guide
    Herpes: A Patient’s Guide Herpes: A Patient’s Guide Introduction Herpes is a very common infection that is passed through HSV-1 and HSV-2: what’s in a name? ....................................................................3 skin-to-skin contact. Canadian studies have estimated that up to 89% of Canadians have been exposed to herpes simplex Herpes symptoms .........................................................................................................4 type 1 (HSV-1), which usually shows up as cold sores on the Herpes transmission: how do you get herpes? ................................................6 mouth. In a British Columbia study, about 15% of people tested positive for herpes simplex type 2 (HSV-2), which Herpes testing: when is it useful? ..........................................................................8 is the type of herpes most commonly thought of as genital herpes. Recently, HSV-1 has been showing up more and Herpes treatment: managing your symptoms ...................................................10 more on the genitals. Some people can have both types of What does herpes mean to you: receiving a new diagnosis ......................12 herpes. Most people have such minor symptoms that they don’t even know they have herpes. What does herpes mean to you: accepting your diagnosis ........................14 While herpes is very common, it also carries a lot of stigma. What does herpes mean to you: dating with herpes ....................................16 This stigma can lead to anxiety, fear and misinformation
    [Show full text]
  • HIV Infection and AIDS
    G Maartens 12 HIV infection and AIDS Clinical examination in HIV disease 306 Prevention of opportunistic infections 323 Epidemiology 308 Preventing exposure 323 Global and regional epidemics 308 Chemoprophylaxis 323 Modes of transmission 308 Immunisation 324 Virology and immunology 309 Antiretroviral therapy 324 ART complications 325 Diagnosis and investigations 310 ART in special situations 326 Diagnosing HIV infection 310 Prevention of HIV 327 Viral load and CD4 counts 311 Clinical manifestations of HIV 311 Presenting problems in HIV infection 312 Lymphadenopathy 313 Weight loss 313 Fever 313 Mucocutaneous disease 314 Gastrointestinal disease 316 Hepatobiliary disease 317 Respiratory disease 318 Nervous system and eye disease 319 Rheumatological disease 321 Haematological abnormalities 322 Renal disease 322 Cardiac disease 322 HIV-related cancers 322 306 • HIV INFECTION AND AIDS Clinical examination in HIV disease 2 Oropharynx 34Neck Eyes Mucous membranes Lymph node enlargement Retina Tuberculosis Toxoplasmosis Lymphoma HIV retinopathy Kaposi’s sarcoma Progressive outer retinal Persistent generalised necrosis lymphadenopathy Parotidomegaly Oropharyngeal candidiasis Cytomegalovirus retinitis Cervical lymphadenopathy 3 Oral hairy leucoplakia 5 Central nervous system Herpes simplex Higher mental function Aphthous ulcers 4 HIV dementia Kaposi’s sarcoma Progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy Teeth Focal signs 5 Toxoplasmosis Primary CNS lymphoma Neck stiffness Cryptococcal meningitis 2 Tuberculous meningitis Pneumococcal meningitis 6
    [Show full text]
  • Rubella (German Measles)
    Rubella (German Measles) Frequently Asked Questions What is rubella? Rubella is a common childhood disease caused by a virus. It can last one to five days and is generally a mild disease. Who gets rubella? Rubella can affect anyone of any age. Once you have had the infection you are usually immune and cannot catch it again. There are still cases of rubella around the world where populations are not vaccinated against the disease. How do people get rubella? When an infected person coughs or sneezes, the virus is released into the air and enters another person’s body through the nose or throat. Rubella is contagious seven days before and seven days after the rash appears. The rubella virus may also be found in the blood, urine, and stool of people who have the illness. What are the symptoms of rubella? Symptoms of rubella show up 14 to 21 days after exposure. Symptoms are often mild, and up to half of people infected with rubella virus have no symptoms at all. Symptoms include: • Low-grade fever • Swollen glands or lymph nodes • Rash • Small red bumps on the roof of the mouth (known as Forchheimer’s sign) • Dry, flaking skin • Swollen or bloodshot eyes • Stuffy nose • Joint pain and swelling (arthritis) • Loss of appetite • Headache Are there complications with a rubella virus infection? Rubella is usually a mild disease in children; adults tend to have more complications. The most serious danger of rubella is to pregnant women and the developing fetus. A miscarriage or premature delivery may occur in pregnant women.
    [Show full text]
  • Varicella (Chickenpox): Questions and Answers Q&A Information About the Disease and Vaccines
    Varicella (Chickenpox): Questions and Answers Q&A information about the disease and vaccines What causes chickenpox? more common in infants, adults, and people with Chickenpox is caused by a virus, the varicella-zoster weakened immune systems. virus. How do I know if my child has chickenpox? How does chickenpox spread? Usually chickenpox can be diagnosed by disease his- Chickenpox spreads from person to person by direct tory and appearance alone. Adults who need to contact or through the air by coughing or sneezing. know if they’ve had chickenpox in the past can have It is highly contagious. It can also be spread through this determined by a laboratory test. Chickenpox is direct contact with the fluid from a blister of a per- much less common now than it was before a vaccine son infected with chickenpox, or from direct contact became available, so parents, doctors, and nurses with a sore from a person with shingles. are less familiar with it. It may be necessary to perform laboratory testing for children to confirm chickenpox. How long does it take to show signs of chickenpox after being exposed? How long is a person with chickenpox contagious? It takes from 10 to 21 days to develop symptoms after Patients with chickenpox are contagious for 1–2 days being exposed to a person infected with chickenpox. before the rash appears and continue to be conta- The usual time period is 14–16 days. gious through the first 4–5 days or until all the blisters are crusted over. What are the symptoms of chickenpox? Is there a treatment for chickenpox? The most common symptoms of chickenpox are rash, fever, coughing, fussiness, headache, and loss of appe- Most cases of chickenpox in otherwise healthy children tite.
    [Show full text]