DOCSLIB.ORG

Scoping Report for Hotel Development in Liselo Communal Area, Zambezi Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scoping Report for Hotel Development in Liselo Communal Area, Zambezi Region 1 SCOPING REPORT FOR HOTEL DEVELOPMENT IN LISELO COMMUNAL AREA, ZAMBEZI REGION Assessed by: NYEPEZ CONSULTANCY CC Assessed for: Mr George Mweshihange Simataa- Zambezi Suns Hotel Namibia cc Sun Hotel Development March 2019 2 COPYRIGHT©ZAMBEZI SUNS HOTEL NAMIBIA CC, 2019. All rights reserved Project Name Proposed Sun Hotel at Liselo Area (Mr George Mweshihange Simataa) Zambezi Suns Hotel Namibia cc Client P.O Box 2227 Ngweze Katima Mulilo Mobile +264 81 3254481 [email protected] Mr Gift Sinyepe Lead Consultant NYEPEZ Consultancy cc (Reg CC/2016/07561) P.O Box 2325 Ngweze Namibia Date of release 11 March 2019 Contributors to the Report None Contact Mobile: +264 814554221 / 812317252 [email protected] 3 This Study Report on the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study report is submitted to the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) in conformity with the requirements of the Environmental Management Act, 2007 and the Environment Impact Assessment and Audit Regulations, 2012. March 2019 DECLARATION The Consultant submits this study report on the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Study report for Zambezi Sun Hotel Namibia cc as the project proponent. I certify to the best of my knowledge that the information contained in this report is accurate and truthful representation as presented by the client. NYEPEZ Consultancy cc REG. No. CC/2016/07561 Signature: _____________________ Proponent: I, Zambezi Suns Hotel Namibia cc (Owner) do certify to the best of our knowledge that information contained in this report is accurate and truthful representation. P.O. Box 2227 - Zambezi Suns Hotel Namibia cc, Namibia Signed: _____________________ Signed on: ____________ day of: _________ 2019 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 10 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Terms and reference .............................................................................................................. 11 2. CURRENT LAND USE ............................................................................................................... 12 3. ACCESSIBILITY TO SERVICES & COMMUNITY FACILITIES........................................... 12 4. OWNERSHIP ............................................................................................................................... 13 5. POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................... 13 6. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT....................................................................... 15 6.1 Locality ....................................................................................................................................... 15 6.2 Project Rationale ................................................................................................................... 18 7. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL OVERVIEW OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .. 19 7.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 19 7.2 Climate ........................................................................................................................................ 19 7.3 Topography and soils .................................................................................................................. 19 7.4 Surface and Ground water Hydrology ........................................................................................ 20 7.5 Landscape characteristics ............................................................................................................ 21 7.5.1 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................ 21 7.5.2 Birds ..................................................................................................................................... 22 7.5.3 Wildlife ................................................................................................................................ 22 7.5.4 Agriculture ........................................................................................................................... 23 7.6 Socio Economic Profile .............................................................................................................. 24 Benefits and increased economic activities................................................................................... 24 8. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................................ 25 8.1 Site Layout .................................................................................................................................. 25 8.2 Construction and Operational Phases ......................................................................................... 25 8.3 Construction Phase Activities ..................................................................................................... 26 8.4 Operational activities .................................................................................................................. 28 9. ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE ......................................................................................... 29 9.1 Water ........................................................................................................................................... 29 9.2 Electrical Services ....................................................................................................................... 29 9.3 Sewage Treatment and Disposal ................................................................................................. 30 9.4 Solid Waste Disposal .................................................................................................................. 30 9.5 Access road to the project site ..................................................................................................... 31 10. STAKEHOLDER AND COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS ................................................ 32 11. MAJOR IMPACTS IDENTIFIED ............................................................................................ 34 5 11.1 Deforestation and ecosystem impacts ....................................................................................... 34 11.2 Grazing for Livestock ............................................................................................................... 34 11.3 Groundwater Surface Water and Soil contamination................................................................ 35 11.4 Noise pollution .......................................................................................................................... 35 11.5 Sustainability / Potential Appraisal ........................................................................................... 36 12. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION ............................................................................ 37 12.1 Assessment of Impacts .............................................................................................................. 37 12.2 Operational Phase ..................................................................................................................... 43 13. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................................................. 46 13.1 Objectives of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) ..................................................... 46 14. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) 48 14.1 Mitigation Measures during Constructions Phase & Operation Phases of the Hotel development ...................................................................................................................................... 48 15. DECOMISSIONING PHASE......................................................................................................... 52 16. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 52 16.1 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 52 16.2 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 53 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................... 54 6 KINDLY NOTE THE FOLLOWING 1. The project site proposed for hotel (1.5 hectares) is part of the land was allocated to the late owner Mr George C. Simataa of 3.5 hectares in the year 2002. 2. The PTO Permission to occupy is hereby attached 3. The late owner upon verification of the land, subdivided the 3.5 into two (2) portion. 2 hectares was earmarked for Oshana Rest Camp and 1.5 Hectare was left unutilised for future developments 4. The entire 3.5 hectares which comprise of the two portions as per the map attached was inherited and registered in the name of his first-born Son Mr. George Mwashihange Simataa. (see latter from the traditional authority attached) 5. The Son Mr. George Mwashingange Simataa is currently responsible for the existing operations of the Oshana Rest Camp and the remainder of the land
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GUIDE to CIVIL SOCIETY in NAMIBIA 3Rd Edition
    GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA GUIDE TO 3Rd Edition 3Rd Compiled by Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono and Naita Marowa PJ Rejoice Compiled by GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA 3rd Edition AN OVERVIEW OF THE MANDATE AND ACTIVITIES OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS IN NAMIBIA Compiled by Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA COMPILED BY: Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono PUBLISHED BY: Namibia Institute for Democracy FUNDED BY: Hanns Seidel Foundation Namibia COPYRIGHT: 2018 Namibia Institute for Democracy. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means electronical or mechanical including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the permission of the publisher. DESIGN AND LAYOUT: K22 Communications/Afterschool PRINTED BY : John Meinert Printing ISBN: 978-99916-865-5-4 PHYSICAL ADDRESS House of Democracy 70-72 Dr. Frans Indongo Street Windhoek West P.O. Box 11956, Klein Windhoek Windhoek, Namibia EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.nid.org.na You may forward the completed questionnaire at the end of this guide to NID or contact NID for inclusion in possible future editions of this guide Foreword A vibrant civil society is the cornerstone of educated, safe, clean, involved and spiritually each community and of our Democracy. uplifted. Namibia’s constitution gives us, the citizens and inhabitants, the freedom and mandate CSOs spearheaded Namibia’s Independence to get involved in our governing process. process. As watchdogs we hold our elected The 3rd Edition of the Guide to Civil Society representatives accountable.
    [Show full text]
  • Go Wild – Boxed2go Track Namibia’S Awesome Wildlife
    Go Wild – Boxed2Go Track Namibia’s awesome wildlife. 12 Day Namibian Self-Drive Safari. Experience the wild side of Namibia on this twelve-day trip through the northern regions of the country. Join the Gondwana Collection and Namibia2Go for a special Namibian journey. This carefully planned safari includes stopovers at all the popular wildlife sites. Beginning in Windhoek, the route leads northwards to the famous Etosha National Park, where two nights are enjoyed at the unique and quirky Etosha Safari Camp. The third day is spent travelling into the heart of Etosha for superb wildlife viewing, exiting in the late afternoon at the northern gate. Overnight at the stylish Etosha King Nehale on the Andoni Plains before travelling further north to the peaceful oasis of Hakusembe Lodge on the glittering Okavango River. Arrive in time to raise your glass and watch the sun sink into the horizon from the deck of the lodge. As you journey eastwards into the Zambezi Region and toward the Kwando River, a wilder Africa calls. A sanctuary for wildlife, Bwabwata National Park and surrounds provide countless photographic opportunities. Tune in to the sounds of the river and fall asleep to the chortling of hippos at Namushasha River Lodge. A highlight of a stay is a trip into Bwabwata, by boat and game-viewing vehicle. The safari continues further east on the floodplains of the Chobe River, adjacent to Chobe National Park, where it’s possible to spot elephant, buffalo and water-adapted antelope like sitatunga at different times of the year. After savouring the delights of Chobe, you enter into the enchanted world of the mighty Zambezi River, where the life-affirming calls of fish eagles resound through the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Angolan Giraffe (Giraffa Camelopardalis Ssp
    Angolan Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. angolensis) Appendix 1: Historical and recent geographic range and population of Angolan Giraffe G. c. angolensis Geographic Range ANGOLA Historical range in Angola Giraffe formerly occurred in the mopane and acacia savannas of southern Angola (East 1999). According to Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo (2005), the historic distribution of the species presented a discontinuous range with two, reputedly separated, populations. The western-most population extended from the upper course of the Curoca River through Otchinjau to the banks of the Kunene (synonymous Cunene) River, and through Cuamato and the Mupa area further north (Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo 2005, Dagg 1962). The intention of protecting this western population of G. c. angolensis, led to the proclamation of Mupa National Park (Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo 2005, P. Vaz Pinto pers. comm.). The eastern population occurred between the Cuito and Cuando Rivers, with larger numbers of records from the southeast corner of the former Mucusso Game Reserve (Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo 2005, Dagg 1962). By the late 1990s Giraffe were assumed to be extinct in Angola (East 1999). According to Kuedikuenda and Xavier (2009), a small population of Angolan Giraffe may still occur in Mupa National Park; however, no census data exist to substantiate this claim. As the Park was ravaged by poachers and refugees, it was generally accepted that Giraffe were locally extinct until recent re-introductions into southern Angola from Namibia (Kissama Foundation 2015, East 1999, P. Vaz Pinto pers. comm.). BOTSWANA Current range in Botswana Recent genetic analyses have revealed that the population of Giraffe in the Central Kalahari and Khutse Game Reserves in central Botswana is from the subspecies G.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Changes in the Zambezi River Basin This Book Is a Product of the CODESRIA Comparative Research Network
    Ecological Changes in the Zambezi River Basin This book is a product of the CODESRIA Comparative Research Network. Ecological Changes in the Zambezi River Basin Edited by Mzime Ndebele-Murisa Ismael Aaron Kimirei Chipo Plaxedes Mubaya Taurai Bere Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa DAKAR © CODESRIA 2020 Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa Avenue Cheikh Anta Diop, Angle Canal IV BP 3304 Dakar, 18524, Senegal Website: www.codesria.org ISBN: 978-2-86978-713-1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without prior permission from CODESRIA. Typesetting: CODESRIA Graphics and Cover Design: Masumbuko Semba Distributed in Africa by CODESRIA Distributed elsewhere by African Books Collective, Oxford, UK Website: www.africanbookscollective.com The Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA) is an independent organisation whose principal objectives are to facilitate research, promote research-based publishing and create multiple forums for critical thinking and exchange of views among African researchers. All these are aimed at reducing the fragmentation of research in the continent through the creation of thematic research networks that cut across linguistic and regional boundaries. CODESRIA publishes Africa Development, the longest standing Africa based social science journal; Afrika Zamani, a journal of history; the African Sociological Review; Africa Review of Books and the Journal of Higher Education in Africa. The Council also co- publishes Identity, Culture and Politics: An Afro-Asian Dialogue; and the Afro-Arab Selections for Social Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zambezi River Basin: Water Resources Management
    Department of Physical Geography The Zambezi River Basin: water resources management Energy-Food-Water nexus approach Gabriel Sainz Sanchez Master’s thesis NKA 216 Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, 45 Credits 2018 Preface This Master’s thesis is Gabriel Sainz Sanchez’s degree project in Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology at the Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University. The Master’s thesis comprises 45 credits (one and a half term of full-time studies). Supervisors have been Arvid Bring at the Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University and Louise Croneborg-Jones, The World Bank. Examiner has been Steffen Holzkämper at the Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University. The author is responsible for the contents of this thesis. Stockholm, 8 June 2018 Lars-Ove Westerberg Vice Director of studies Abstract The energy-food-water nexus is of fundamental significance in the goal towards sustainable development. The Zambezi River Basin, situated in southern Africa, currently offers vast water resources for social and economic development for the eight riparian countries that constitute the watershed. Hydropower generation and agriculture are the main water users in the watershed with great potential of expansion, plus urban water supply materialise the largest consumers of this resource. Climate and social changes are pressuring natural resources availability which might show severe alterations due to enhances in the variability of precipitation patterns. This study thus examines the present water resources in the transboundary basin and executes low and high case future climate change incited scenarios in order to estimate the possible availability of water for the period 2060-2099 by performing water balances.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Geopolitics of Foreign Involvement in Namibia: a Mixed Methods Approach
    CRITICAL GEOPOLITICS OF FOREIGN INVOLVEMENT IN NAMIBIA: A MIXED METHODS APPROACH by MEREDITH JOY DEBOOM B.A., University of Iowa, 2009 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Masters of Arts Department of Geography 2013 This thesis entitled: Critical Geopolitics of Foreign Involvement in Namibia: A Mixed Methods Approach written by Meredith Joy DeBoom has been approved for the Department of Geography John O’Loughlin, Chair Joe Bryan, Committee Member Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii Abstract DeBoom, Meredith Joy (M.A., Geography) Critical Geopolitics of Foreign Involvement in Namibia: A Mixed Methods Approach Thesis directed by Professor John O’Loughlin In May 2011, Namibia’s Minister of Mines and Energy issued a controversial new policy requiring that all future extraction licenses for “strategic” minerals be issued only to state-owned companies. The public debate over this policy reflects rising concerns in southern Africa over who should benefit from globally-significant resources. The goal of this thesis is to apply a critical geopolitics approach to create space for the consideration of Namibian perspectives on this topic, rather than relying on Western geopolitical and political discourses. Using a mixed methods approach, I analyze Namibians’ opinions on foreign involvement, particularly involvement in natural resource extraction, from three sources: China, South Africa, and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Region Address by Honourable Penda Ya Ndakolo Regional Governor of Oshikoto Region Date: 17 July 2020 Time: 10H00 V
    STATE OF THE REGION ADDRESS JULY 2020 OSHIKOTO REGION OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL GOVERNOR Tel: (065) 244800 P O Box 19247 Fax: (065) 244879 OMUTHIYA STATE OF THE REGION ADDRESS BY HONOURABLE PENDA YA NDAKOLO REGIONAL GOVERNOR OF OSHIKOTO REGION DATE: 17 JULY 2020 TIME: 10H00 VENUE: OMUTHIYA ELCIN CHURCH OSHIKOTO REGION 1 | P a g e STATE OF THE REGION ADDRESS JULY 2020 Director of Ceremonies Tatekulu Filemon Shuumbwa, Omukwaniilwa Gwelelo Lyandonga Hai-//Om Traditional Authority Honourable Samuel Shivute, Chairperson of the Oshikoto Regional Council Honourable Regional Councilors Your Worship the Mayors of Tsumeb Municipality, Omuthiya and Oniipa Town Councils Local Authority Councilors Mr. Frans Enkali, Chief Regional Officer, Oshikoto Regional Council All Chief Executive Officers Senior Government Officials Traditional Councillors Commissioner Armas Shivute, NAMPOL Regional Commander, Oshikoto Region Commissioner Leonard Mahundu, Officer in Charge, E. Shikongo Correctional Services Regional Heads of various Ministries & Institutions in the Region Comrade Armas Amukwiyu, SWAPO Party Regional Coordinator for Oshikoto Veterans of the Liberation Struggle Captains of Industries Traditional and Community Leaders Spiritual Leaders 2 | P a g e STATE OF THE REGION ADDRESS JULY 2020 Distinguished Invited Guests Staff members of both the Office of the Governor and Oshikoto Regional Council Members of the Media Fellow Namibians As part of the constitutional mandate, I am delighted, honored and privileged to present the socio-economic development aspects of the region for the period 2019/2020. It is officially called as State of the Region Address (SORA). I thank you all Honorable Members, Traditional Authorities, Chief Regional Officer, Senior Government Officials, Staff members and general public for your presence here during this unprecedented times of Covid-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform Is Basically a Class Issue”
    This land is my land! Motions and emotions around land reform in Namibia Erika von Wietersheim 1 This study and publication was supported by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Namibia Office. Copyright: FES 2021 Cover photo: Kristin Baalman/Shutterstock.com Cover design: Clara Mupopiwa-Schnack All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, copied or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system without the written permission of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. First published 2008 Second extended edition 2021 Published by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Namibia Office P.O. Box 23652 Windhoek Namibia ISBN 978-99916-991-0-3 Printed by John Meinert Printing (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 5688 Windhoek / Namibia [email protected] 2 To all farmers in Namibia who love their land and take good care of it in honour of their ancestors and for the sake of their children 3 4 Acknowledgement I would like to thank the Friedrich-Ebert Foundation Windhoek, in particular its director Mr. Hubert Schillinger at the time of the first publication and Ms Freya Gruenhagen at the time of this extended second publication, as well as Sylvia Mundjindi, for generously supporting this study and thus making the publication of ‘This land is my land’ possible. Furthermore I thank Wolfgang Werner for adding valuable up-to-date information to this book about the development of land reform during the past 13 years. My special thanks go to all farmers who received me with an open heart and mind on their farms, patiently answered my numerous questions - and took me further with questions of their own - and those farmers and interview partners who contributed to this second edition their views on the progress of land reform until 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform in Namibia: an Analysis of Media Coverage
    LAND REFORM IN NAMIBIA: AN ANALYSIS OF MEDIA COVERAGE By Petrus J. Engelbrecht Submitted to the graduate degree program in African and African-American Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. ________________________________ Chairperson: Dr. Elizabeth MacGonagle ________________________________ Dr. Hannah Britton ________________________________ Dr. Ebenezer Obadare Date Defended: June 25, 2011 The Thesis Committee for Petrus J. Engelbrecht certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: LAND REFORM IN NAMIBIA: AN ANALYSIS OF MEDIA COVERAGE ________________________________ Chairperson Elizabeth MacGonagle Date approved: June 25, 2014 ii ABSTRACT The highly inequitable land ownership that resulted from nearly a century of colonization is an important socio-economic issue that must be overcome in order to ensure Namibia’s long-term stability and success. The media plays an important role in ensuring that land reform is successfully designed and executed. The media informs the public, sets the public and political agenda, holds the government accountable, and serves as a public sphere. This project analyses Namibia’s three primary daily newspapers’ coverage of land reform from 2003 to 2013 utilizing interpretive content analysis to determine how the papers are reporting on land reform and related themes. I then compare their portrayals to see to what they are fulfilling their roles. I find that the papers’ reporting is mostly event-driven and lacks depth and greater context. Furthermore, the papers offer a mostly one-sided view of issues. While the papers regularly reported on land reform, they generally struggle to accomplish the function that the media fulfills in a democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • AFRICAN MEDIA BAROMETER NAMIBIA 2009 3 the African Media Barometer (AMB)
    AFRICAN MEDIA BAROMETER The first home grown analysis of the media landscape in Africa NAMIBIA 2009 Published by: Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA) Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) fesmedia Africa Windhoek, Namibia Tel: +264 (0)61 237438 E-mail: [email protected] www.fesmedia.org Director: Rolf Paasch ISBN No. 978-99916-859-2-2 CONTENTS SECTOR 1 9 Freedom of expression, including freedom of the media, are effectively protected and promoted SECTOR 2 25 The media landscape is characterised by diversity, independence and sustainability SECTOR 3 41 Broadcasting regulation is transparent and independent, the state broadcaster is transformed into a truly public broadcaster SECTOR 4 57 The Media practise high levels of professional standards AFRICAN MEDIA BAROMETER NAMIBIA 2009 3 The African Media Barometer (AMB) The Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung’s Southern African Media Project (fesmedia Africa) took the initiative together with the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA) to start the African Media Barometer (AMB) in April 2005, a self assessment exercise done by Africans themselves according to homegrown criteria. The project is the first in-depth and comprehensive description and measurement system for national media environments on the African continent. The benchmarks are to a large extent taken from the African Commission for Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR)1 “Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression in Africa”, adopted in 2002. This declaration was largely inspired by the groundbreaking “Windhoek Declaration on Promoting an Independent and Pluralistic African Press” (1991) and the “African Charter on Broadcasting” (2001). By the end of 2008, 23 sub-Saharan countries have been covered by the AMB.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report for Saili Community Irrigation Farm for Banana & Various Fruit Trees at Lisikili Communal Area, Zambezi Region
    1 SCOPING REPORT FOR SAILI COMMUNITY IRRIGATION FARM FOR BANANA & VARIOUS FRUIT TREES AT LISIKILI COMMUNAL AREA, ZAMBEZI REGION Assessed by: Assessed for: NYEPEZ CONSULTANCY CC Saili Agricultural Investment (Pty) Ltd May 2019 Environmental Scoping Report_ Banana & Fruit farming_Lisikili Communal Area 2 IMPORTANT NOTE 1. Kindly note that this is an amendment Scoping Report inclusive of the directives as recommended by the Ministry of Agriculture Water & Forestry (MAWF). 2. The recommendations by the MAWF are included as amendments both in the report summaries and as attachments or appendixes. These include 1. water abstraction requirements, 2. Vegetation species botanical study and 3. the proposed farm infrastructure development layout. Environmental Scoping Report_ Banana & Fruit farming_Lisikili Communal Area 3 COPYRIGHT© SAILI AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT (PTY) LTD 2019. All rights reserved Project Name Proposed Irrigation Farm at Lisikili Communal Area Saili Agricultural Investment (Pty) Ltd P.O Box 98675 Client Pelican Square Windhoek Namibia Mobile +264 818162894 Mr. Gift Sinyepe Lead Consultant NYEPEZ Consultancy cc P.O Box 2325 Ngweze Namibia Date of release 01 May 2019 Contributors to the Report N/A Contact Nyepez Consultant Mobile: +264 814554221 / 812317252 [email protected] Environmental Scoping Report_ Banana & Fruit farming_Lisikili Communal Area 4 This Study Report on the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study report is submitted to the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) in conformity with the requirements of the Environmental Management Act, 2007 and the Environment Impact Assessment and Audit Regulations, 2012. May 2019 DECLARATION The Consultant submits this study report on the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Study report for Saili Agricultural Investment (Pty) Ltd as the project proponent.
    [Show full text]
  • In Community Based Natural Resources Management in Zambezi Region, Namibia Rodger Lubilo
    Enactment of ‘Community’ in Community Based Natural Resources Management in Zambezi Region, Namibia Rodger Lubilo Enactment of ‘Community’ in Community Based Natural Resources Management in Zambezi Region, Namibia Rodgers Lubilo Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr H. van Dijk Personal chair at Sociology of Development and Change Group Wageningen University & Research Co-promotor Dr P. Hebinck Associate professor, Sociology of Development and Change Group Wageningen University & Research Other members Prof. Dr V.R. van der Duim, Wageningen University & Research Prof. Dr S.E. Shackleton, University of Cape Town, South Africa Prof. Dr M. Bollig, University of Cologne, Germany Prof. Dr M.J. Spierenburg, Radboud University Nijmegen This research was conducted under the auspices of the Wageningen School of Social Sciences (WASS) Enactment of ‘Community’ in Community Based Natural Resources Management in Zambezi Region, Namibia Rodgers Lubilo Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus, Prof. Dr A.P.J. Mol, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Tuesday8 May 2018 at 01.30 p.m. in the Aula. Rodgers Lubilo Enactment of ‘Community’ in Community Based Natural Resources Management in Zambezi Region, Namibia, 214 pages. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands (2018) With references, with summary in English ISBN 978-94-6343-858-2 DOI https://doi.org/10.18174/446408 Table
    [Show full text]