UC Berkeley Postprints

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UC Berkeley Postprints UC Berkeley Postprints Title Measuring Local Diversity in Early Iron Age Animal Economies: A View from Khirbat al- Mudayna al-‘Aliya (Jordan) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5d25c95x Authors Lev-Tov, Justin Porter, Benjamin W. Routledge, Bruce Publication Date 2011 DOI 10.5615/bullamerschoorie.361.0067 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Measuring Local Diversity in Early Iron Age Animal Economies: A View from Khirbat al-Mudayna al-ʿAliya (Jordan) Justin S. E. Lev-Tov Benjamin W. Porter Statistical Research, Inc. Department of Near Eastern Studies 21 W. Stuart Avenue University of California, Berkeley Redlands, CA 92374 240 Barrows Hall, #1940 [email protected] Berkeley, CA 94720 [email protected] Bruce E. Routledge School of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology Hartley Building Brownlow Street University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 3GS, United Kingdom [email protected] We use faunal evidence from Khirbat al-Mudayna al-ʿAliya, an agropastoral settle- ment located in west-central Jordan, to examine early Iron Age subsistence regimes. Analysis of faunal evidence reveals a low-intensity, nonspecialized animal economy de- pendent on both domesticated and wild species, including freshwater crabs. The sub- sistence economy of the settlement, we argue, was structured so as to take maximum advantage of its location overlooking the Wadi al-Nukhayla, a perennial water source supporting a relatively verdant floral and faunal array. This diverse and flexible organ- ization made subsistence in this resource-scarce environment more sustainable. When this profile is compared with other early Iron Age southern Levantine communities, the diversity of ways that animal economies were organized during this period is apparent, signaling the need to investigate the local strategies that communities used to adapt to their immediate environmental circumstances, not only ecologically but also socially. s in many parts of the world (see deFrance tions traditionally asked by biblical archaeologists. 2009), the zooarchaeology of post-Neolithic At the same time, ideology and identity demarcated a A communities in the southern Levant has topic where evidence from the southern Levant gen- tended to focus on issues of social complexity, particu- erated immediate global interest, due to the region’s larly political economy, status, and ideology/identity. historical link to three major world religions. By and Indeed, the growth of interest in the zooarchaeology large, this marriage of global and traditional interests of early Iron Age communities in the southern Le- has been positive, if only for its role in promoting the vant since the 1980s can be credited directly to one of serious collection and analysis of faunal assemblages these themes—namely, ideology/identity. Analysis of from historic-period settlements. However, this suc- the ideological use of animals (e.g., in ritual sacrifice), cess has come at a price—namely, the prioritizing of and the relationship between diet and collective iden- group identity in explaining diversity within and be- tity (e.g., pork consumption), fit well with the ques- tween early Iron Age faunal assemblages. In contrast, 67 68 LEV-TOV, PORTER, AND ROUTLEDGE BASOR 361 a comparison of recent zooarchaeological studies (e.g., huber and Roberts 2009; Gitin, Mazar, and Stern Lev-Tov 2006; Raban-Gerstel et al. 2008; Marom et al. 1998; Ward and Joukowsky 1992), their effects are 2009) suggests that early Iron Age faunal assemblages visible in the archaeological record: the collapse of can show a high degree of inter-settlement variability palace economies, the migration of groups between best explained in terms of localized subsistence strate- regions, and the intensification of settlement in areas gies and environmental adaptations. In this paper, we previously limited or lacking in population. Due to illustrate the importance of such local adaptations in the collapse of international commercial networks and early Iron Age subsistence practices using the faunal the decline in demand for finished goods and luxury assemblage from Khirbat al-Mudayna al-ʿAliya (here- items, early Iron Age economies experienced a reor- after KMA), an early Iron Age settlement located on ganization that emphasized meeting local subsistence the semiarid eastern margins of west-central Jordan. needs rather than market demand. This shift to a lim- KMA (Routledge 2000; 2004: 96–108; Routledge ited and local subsistence economy is reflected in the and Porter 2007) was one of several small agropasto- many small and medium-sized settlements that have ralist communities founded in the 11th century b.c.e. been surveyed and excavated across the region (e.g., in west-central Jordan and abandoned after no more Miller 2003). Excavated evidence indicates that these than a century of occupation. These settlements were settlements often depended on naturally available lo- located in a semiarid zone with limited precipitation cal resources to organize low-intensity agropastoral levels and poor soil quality. The analysis of excavated economies around grain production, viticulture, and faunal evidence reveals that the community organized animal husbandry at household and community levels a low-intensity, nonspecialized animal economy that (Hopkins 1985; Stager 1985). depended on both domesticated and wild species. Faunal assemblages recovered from early Iron Age When this profile is compared with published data settlements, like other archaeological and textual evi- from other early Iron Age southern Levantine settle- dence, have been used to distinguish among early Iron ments, the diversity of ways that animal economies Age ethnic groups (Finkelstein 1996; Hesse 1990; were organized during this period is apparent. These Faust 2006: 35–40; Killebrew 2005: 176, 219; but findings reaffirm the need for archaeologists to investi- cf. Hesse and Wapnish 1997). Early Iron Age Israel- gate the local strategies that communities use to adapt ite society, for example, is characterized as recently to their immediate environmental circumstances and settled agropastoralists living in villages in the Central avoid regional panoramic generalizations that do not Highlands north and south of modern Jerusalem, while account for synchronic diversity. the Philistines are characterized as urban agricultural producers and craftspeople living in the coastal plain early iron age animal economies: between Gaza and Tel Aviv (e.g., Dever 1995; Kille- trends and limitations brew 2005; Miller 2004; Stager 1998). The sugges- tion that ethnic differences should be apparent in the Comparatively speaking, the animal economies faunal evidence is strengthened by the Hebrew Bible’s of the early Iron Age southern Levant have seen ex- tendency to link subsistence practices with early Iron tensive investigation by zooarchaeologists. This at- Age ethnic groups—Canaanites, Israelites, Philis- tention is due, in part, to the search for data beyond tines, Moabites—that scholars believe were bounded the limited and problematic written sources (e.g., by discrete identities and practices, and expressed in the Hebrew Bible) used to reconstruct the time pe- the material record. Scholars combine these textual riod’s history and societies. The early Iron Age (the and artifactual representations of early Iron Age sub- 12th through early 10th centuries b.c.e.) throughout sistence practices with ethnographic categories con- the southern Levant is characterized as a period of structed from recently past and contemporary Middle gradual recovery following a period of political and Eastern societies (e.g., “nomads” and “pastoralists”) in economic upheavals unevenly experienced throughout order to help them interpret patterns in the archaeolog- the eastern Mediterranean and Near East at the end of ical evidence. These patterns, then, are sought in the the Late Bronze Age.1 Although scholars have long archaeological record and then linked to specific eth- debated the reasons for these upheavals (e.g., Bach- nic identities (e.g., Levy and Holl 2002; Levy 2008). While we are not interested here in passing judgment 1 See Bloch-Smith and Nakhai 1999 for an overview of the time on attempts to identify early Iron Age ethnic groups, period. we do argue that this rush to “read” ethnicity into sub- 2011 LOCAL DIVERSITY IN EARLY IRON AGE ANIMAL ECONOMIES 69 sistence strategies, and particularly, animal economies, seasons of mapping and excavation on various scales has analytical consequences. The first consequence (Routledge 2000; 2004: 96–108; 2008; Routledge and is that subsistence practices are often characterized Porter 2007). The settlement is positioned in a semi- only by the relative abundance of a particular animal arid zone, falling between the 100 and 300 mm iso- type (e.g., pigs). A second consequence is that static hyets (el-Sherbini 1979: 174, table 2), and therefore categories are created that do not represent how com- receives only the minimum amount of precipitation plex such strategies likely were in antiquity. Societies needed to practice rain-fed agriculture.2 The yellow are described as being, or becoming, either nomadic Mediterranean and yellow steppic soils surrounding or sedentary, pastoralist or farmer, hunter or herder, the settlement make agricultural production difficult, when in fact, the evidence suggests that a combina- as compared with the red Mediterranean soils to the tion of these labels and a variety of herding
Recommended publications
  • New Discoveries Among the Philistines: Archaeological and Textual Considerations
    Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 9/1Ð2 (1998): 57Ð70. Article copyright © 2000 by Michael G. Hasel. New Discoveries Among the Philistines: Archaeological and Textual Considerations Michael G. Hasel Southern Adventist University Perhaps no other culture of the Bible is more notorious than the Philistines. As the ever present foes of Israel, they are the people who brought about the downfall of Samson (Jdg 16). The Philistines are the only people who ever cap- tured the ark of God (1 Sam 4-6). The Bible records the story of the Philistine giant Goliath, who challenged the armies of Saul and was then defeated by a boy named David whose practiced aim was blessed by the Lord (1 Sam 17). Later David avenged the deaths of Saul and Jonathan at the hands of the Philistines (2 Sam 5:17-25). So the Philistines have become part of the childhood imagination wherever Bible stories are told, epitomizing evil and rebelliousness before the God of heaven. Mention of them brings to mind images of a barbaric, uncivi- lized, and uncouth people. While the first association is biblical, the second is a sociocultural assumption that requires further investigation. Before the dawn of archaeology as a systematic discipline in the Middle East during the last century, these recorded events, renowned as they were through the Judaeo-Christian world, lacked any specific historical context. Today, that picture has changed. We know a great deal more about the everyday life of this ancient people, for the Philistines, more perhaps than any other no ancient
    [Show full text]
  • Just Another Summer Abu Tor Jerusalem, Israel October 25, 1985 Mr
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT WRITER'S CONSENT INSTITUTE OF CURRENT WORLD AFFAIRS s-9 3 Yishay St. Just Another Summer Abu Tor Jerusalem, Israel October 25, 1985 Mr. Peter Bird Martin Institute of Current World Affairs 4 West Wheelock St. Hanover, New Hampshire, USA Dear Peter, The State of Israel has now passed through its 38th summer of existence, but the most recent, the summer of 1985, was not the happiest of them. The nation was clearly engaged in a struggle to determine its future direction as the opposing factions in the government coalition clashed on almost every pressing national issue. The soul-searching wasn't confined to government circles; in the face of a disturbing series of domestic crises and international incidents, the questions of economic reform, defense strategy, peace negotiations with Jordan, Jewish-Arab coexistence, and religious intolerance all became matters of public concern. Yet an important perspective on these problems seemed to be lacking. New interpreta- tions of the country's long history-- and its impact on the present-- did not play any significant role in the public debates. This absence of a broad historical context was especially unfortunate, for 1985 was a banner year in Israel for historical research. This summer, more than 30 major Israeli, American, British, French, and German archaeological expeditions fanned out across the country to excavate some of Israel's most important ancient sites. In few other countries was the scale of the work so massive and the results of the digging so potentially meaningful against the current political background. For despite their scholarly detachment from the concerns of the present, the vari- ous archaeological teams dealt with the same social and political problems that ab- sorbed the attention of the country's politicians and the population at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Shelley Wachsmann
    Curriculum Vitae Shelley Wachsmann PERSONAL DATA Address Nautical Archaeology Program Department of Anthropology Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-4352 Phone (979) 847-9257 E-mail [email protected] [email protected] HIGHER EDUCATION 1984 to 1990 Ph.D. in Near Eastern Archaeology, at the Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem. Dissertation: Seagoing Ships and Seamanship in the Late Bronze Age Levant. Dissertation advisors: Professor Trude Dothan and Professor George F. Bass. 1974 to 1984 MA in Near Eastern Archaeology, cum laude, the Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem. Thesis: Toward a Better Understanding of the Historical Significance of Aegeans Depicted in the Theban Tombs. Thesis advisor: Professor Trude Dothan. 1970 to 1974 BA in Near Eastern and Classical Archaeology, cum laude, at the Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem. HISTORY OF PRIOR ACADEMIC AND RELATED APPOINTMENTS 2010-present Meadows Professor of Biblical Archaeology, Nautical Archaeology Program, Texas A&M University. 2009-2012 Coordinator, Nautical Archaeology Program. 1999-2010 Meadows Associate Professor of Biblical Archaeology, Nautical Archaeology Program, Texas A&M University. 1993-1999 Meadows Assistant Professor of Biblical Archaeology, Nautical Archaeology Program, Texas A&M University. Wachsmann/CV 2 1990-1993 Meadows Visiting Assistant Professor of Biblical Archaeology, Nautical Archaeology Program, Texas A&M University. 1990 Archaeologist/Researcher: Israel Antiquities Authority (formerly Israel Department of Antiquities and Museums [IDAM]) 1976-1989 Inspector of Underwater Antiquities, IDAM. 1975 Assistant to Dr. Amos Kloner, Field Archaeologist in charge of Jerusalem region for IDAM. ____ Assistant to Professor Yigael Yadin preparing excavation material from Tel Hazor for publication (Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem).
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Archaeology: Past, Present, and Future
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Honors Theses Carl Goodson Honors Program 2003 Biblical Archaeology: Past, Present, and Future John JT Thompson Ouachita Baptist University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Thompson, John JT, "Biblical Archaeology: Past, Present, and Future" (2003). Honors Theses. 158. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses/158 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Carl Goodson Honors Program at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Biblical Archaeology: Pa'st, Present, and Future J. T. Thompson Carl Goodson Honors Program Ouachita Baptist University Senior Thesis / Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 A. Introduction: What is Archaeology? 3 B. What is the Archaeology of the Bible? 5 C. Biblical Archaeology: A Timetable 6 l. Beginnings 6 2. Early 1900s 7 3. The Golden Age and William F. Albright 8 4. 1930s-1970s 10 5. Modern Archaeology 13 D. Archaeology and the Bible 15 E. Biblical Archaeology or Syro-Palestinian Archaeology? 19 II. Hazor and Amnon Ben-Tor 21 A. Hazor 21 1. Location 21 2. Biblical Hazor 22 3. Excavations at Hazor 23 4. History 24 5. Excavation Results 26 A. Bronze Age 26 1. History 26 2. Who destroyed Hazor at the end of the Bronze Age? 29 B. Iron Age 32 C. Persian Period 35 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Menorah Review (No. 34, Spring, 1995)
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Menorah Review VCU University Archives 1995 Menorah Review (No. 34, Spring, 1995) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/menorah Part of the History of Religion Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons © The Author(s) Recommended Citation https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/menorah/33 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the VCU University Archives at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Menorah Review by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENORAREVIEW • NUMBER 34 • CENTER FOR JUDAIC STUDIES OF VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SPRING 1995 For the Enrichment of Jewish Thought (i.e., cases of spiritual experiences involv­ ing others that one's own true character ing only God and the isolated individual arises, matures and flourishes. Thus Buber figure) do spring to mind: the burningbush speaks of even the infant in the crib as of Moses; the voice of God as heard by occupied in an aesthetic I-Thou encounter Francis of Assissi and the revelatory dreams with the wallpaper of his room, for the wall­ of, say, the Native American B.1ack Elk­ paper bespeaksthe Thou of its designer, just what could be more private than these? Still, as the designer bespeaksthe eternalThou. In Buberand Rotenstreich are correct in insist­ fact, unless a person enjoys I-Thou relations, ing on the social dimension of spiritual cul­ he can know neither his own self nor the tivation because, unlessMoses, Francis and eternal God.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Thesis Final Draft.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts IRON AGE CANAAN: REGIONAL TRENDS IN ANIMAL ECONOMY A Thesis in Anthropology by Alan P. Moseley © 2015 Alan P. Moseley Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts December 2015 ii The thesis of Alan P. Moseley was reviewed and approved* by the following: Sarah B. McClure Assistant Professor of Anthropology Thesis Co-Advisor Ann E. Killebrew Associate Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies, Jewish Studies, and Anthropology Thesis Co-Advisor George R. Milner Professor of Anthropology Anthropology Department Head *Signatures on file at the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT The Late Bronze Age is often described as an age of internationalism characterized by well-developed political and commercial contacts facilitated by empires and regional imperialism. The end of the Late Bronze Age during the final decades of the 13th century B.C.E. witnessed crises, collapse, and the decline of this world system and imperial aspirations. This upheaval changed the political and economic landscape of the southern Levant, resulting in fragmentation and regionalism that characterizes the 12th and 11th centuries B.C.E. of the early Iron Age. The political environment became increasingly structured with the rise of territorial states during the Iron IIA and the eventual reintegration into an imperial system during the Iron IIC. The restructuring of the region resulted in similarities of livestock frequencies and management strategies at sites in close proximity, forming recognizable economic groups. In this thesis, I examine diachronic change of livestock frequencies and herd management strategies at seven sites – Tel Akko, Tel Miqne-Ekron, Tel es-Safi/Gath, Hazor, Tel Dan, Megiddo, and Tel Dor – located in the southern Levant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Adventure of the Illustrious Scholar
    The Adventure of the Illustrious Scholar Papers Presented to Oscar White Muscarella Edited by Elizabeth Simpson LEIDEN | BOSTON For use by the Author only | © 2018 Koninklijke Brill NV <UN> Contents Preface xiii Oscar White Muscarella: Excavations and Publicatons xvi Introduction 1 Elizabeth Simpson part 1 “There is Nothing like First-hand Evidence” 1 Oscar White Muscarella and Sherlock Holmes 23 Laurie Adams part 2 Arts and Archaeology: Anatolia 2 The King Has Ass’s Ears! The Myth of Midas’s Ears 49 Susanne Berndt 3 The Project to Reconstruct the Early Bronze Age Hattıan Royal Tombs of Alaca Höyük 67 Aykut Çınaroğlu 4 The Lydian Hoard and Its Progeny: Repatriation and the Statute of Limitations 79 Lawrence M. Kaye 5 Labors Lost and Found in Tumulus mm at Gordion 97 Richard F. Liebhart 6 A Pithos Burial at Sardis 117 David Gordon Mitten 7 Attitudes toward the Past in Roman Phrygia: Survivals and Revivals 124 Lynn E. Roller For use by the Author only | © 2018 Koninklijke Brill NV <UN> viii Contents 8 The City Mound at Gordion: The Discovery, Study, and Conservation of the Wooden Fragments from Megaron 3 140 Krysia Spirydowicz 9 Monumental Entrances, Sculpture, and Idols at Kerkenes: Aspects of Phrygian Cult East of the K�z�l�rmak 160 Geoffrey Summers and Françoise Summers 10 Of Fibulae, Of Course! 188 Maya Vassileva part 3 Arts and Archaeology: Urartu 11 Artifacts Belonging to Queen Qaquli and Mr. Tigursagga from an Elaborately Decorated Quarter of the Ayanis Fortress 215 Altan Çilingiroğlu 12 A Fragment of a Ram’s Head Rhyton Found at Qalatgah, Iran 225 Stephan Kroll 13 Toul-E Gilan and the Urartian Empire 230 D.T.
    [Show full text]
  • SEA PEOPLES” in TEXT and ARCHAEOLOGY Archaeology and Biblical Studies
    THE PHILISTINES AND OTHER “SEA PEOPLES” IN TEXT AND ARCHAEOLOGY Archaeology and Biblical Studies Tammi Schneider, Editor Number 15 The Philistines and Other “Sea Peoples” in Text and Archaeology THE PHILISTINES AND OTHER “SEA PEOPLES” IN TEXT AND ARCHAEOLOGY edited by Ann E. Killebrew and Gunnar Lehmann Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta, Georgia THE PHILISTINES AND OTHER “SEA PEOPLES” IN TEXT AND ARCHAEOLOGY Copyright © 2013 by the Society of Biblical Literature All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office, Society of Biblical Literature, 825 Houston Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Philistines and other “sea peoples” in text and archaeology / edited by Ann E. Killebrew and Gunnar Lehmann. p. cm. — (Society of Biblical Literature Archaeology and biblical studies ; v. 15) “This volume developed out of a 2001 workshop devoted to the Philistines and other Sea Peoples, which was co-organized by Ann E. Killebrew, Gunnar Lehmann, Michal Artzy, and Rachel Hachlili, and co-sponsored by the University of Haifa and the Ben Gurion University of the Negev”—Introd. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-58983-129-2 (paper binding : acid-free paper)—ISBN 978-1-58983- 762-1 (hardcover) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbiosis, Symbolism, and the Power of the Past
    Symbiosis, Symbolism, and the Power of the Past Participants in the Albright/ASOR Centennial Symposium, held May 29–31, 2000, at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem From left Front row: Osnat Misch-Brandl, Aren M. Maeir, Shalom Paul, Trude Dothan, William G. Dever, Lydie Shufro, Seymour Gitin, Sarah P. Morris, Susan Sherratt, Ziony Zevit. 2nd row: Peter Machinist, Baruch Halpern, Carol Meyers, Eilat Mazar, Vassos Kara- georghis, David Stronach, H. G. M. Williamson, Avraham Faust. 3rd row: Edouard Lipinski, David Ussishkin, Manfred Bietak, Joseph Aviram, Susan Ack- erman, Charles U. Harris, Sidnie White Crawford, Holly Pittman, Karel van der Toorn, Annie Caubet. 4th row: Mordechai Cogan, Joe Seger, Eliezer Oren, Simo Parpola, Anson F. Rainey. Back row: Eric M. Meyers, J. Edward Wright, Amihai Mazar, Kenneth A. Kitchen, Dan Masters, Israel Finkelstein, James D. Muhly, John J. Collins, Mark S. Smith. Absent: Michal Artzy, Dan Bahat, Amnon Ben-Tor, Avraham Biran, Shlomo Bunimovitz, Moshe Kochavi, Amy-Jill Levine, Baruch A. Levine, Jodi Magness, Abraham Malamat, Doron Mendels, Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, Sari Nusseibeh, James Snyder, Lawrence E. Stager, Ephraim Stern, Daniel Wolk. [Photo courtesy of the Israel Museum] Symbiosis, Symbolism, and the Power of the Past Canaan, Ancient Israel, and Their Neighbors from the Late Bronze Age through Roman Palaestina Proceedings of the Centennial Symposium W. F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research and American Schools of Oriental Research Jerusalem, May 29–31, 2000 edited by William G. Dever and Seymour Gitin Winona Lake, Indiana Eisenbrauns 2003 ç Copyright 2003 by Eisenbrauns. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of the 2002 Annual Meeting in Toronto
    Winter 2002 Volume 52, Number 4 Highlights of the 2002 Annual Meeting in Toronto “The best Annual Meeting ever!” Netherlands, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, her tenacity in helping us locate the best Scotland, Switzerland, USA. hotel for our needs “A great venue!” The presentations were of high “Record turn out!” quality. Additional Notes “Had a wonderful time!” The plenaries by David Stronach, Sy The Lecture Series Committee has “Thank you for a grand conference!” Gitin and Trude Dothan, and Stronach been working hard to secure major again, this time as a minute-man “The food was terrific!” lectures during the course of the replacement for Amy Dockser Marcus, upcoming year and contributed as well “Sessions were full and the presentations were interesting, engaging and very to the groundwork of the public lecture of high caliber!” well attended. in Toronto. This Spring will feature a “Tremendous plenaries!” Committee meetings were scheduled, number of lectures, three in Atlanta co- as far as possible, away from academic sponsored by the Carlos Museum on the These quotable quotes overheard in sessions in order to allow committee Emory University campus, and one in Toronto say it all about the 2002 Annual members to attend more sessions. southern California, co-sponsored by Meeting of the American Schools of the Cotsen Institute. Others are in the Oriental Research—a positive Special Kudos works. conference by all accounts. And the • our persistently helpful board chair, Suzanne Richard, chair of our ad hoc reasons, under close scrutiny, have all P.E. MacAllister and new president, committee on regionally affiliated ASOR checked out to be legitimate: Lawrence Geraty, and vice- The Marriott Eaton Centre Hotel president, Martha Joukowsky served us extremely well in its location, • the efficient and ever-cheerful the layout of meeting space and the Boston staff—Rudy Dornemann, hospitality and helpfulness of the staff.
    [Show full text]
  • The BAS Library | Print
    Print Article Excavating Ekron Major Philistine City Survived by Absorbing Other Cultures By Seymour Gitin David Harris A solid gold cobra, poised to strike, was uncovered in a seventh-century B.C.E. temple at Tel Miqne, a major Philistine city near the Mediterranean coast known in the Bible as Ekron. The cobra, or uraeus, is the symbol of authority often found on the crowns of Egyptian rulers. The one discovered at Ekron measures 8 inches from the tip of its tail to its venomous fangs. The presence of an Egyptian uraeus at Ekron highlights the Philistines’ readiness to absorb foreign cultural influences. In the accompanying article Seymour Gitin, co-director of the Ekron excavation, explains that, contrary to views held until recently, the Philistines did not disappear at the beginning of the first millennium B.C.E., but thrived for many centuries—until their destruction by the Babylonian ruler Nebuchadnezzar in 604 B.C.E. The Philistines were the chief adversary of Biblical Israel in the 12th and 11th centuries B.C.E. They were also the conquerors of the Canaanite cities of the southern coastal plain.1 At the beginning of the first millennium B.C.E., however, the Philistine cities were destroyed and the Philistines themselves seem to have become a casualty of history, as they apparently disappeared from the archaeological and historical record. This was the conclusion of most historians and archaeologists—until we began to excavate the Philistine site of Tel Miqne (Biblical Ekron), on the border of the Israelite hill country, 22 miles southwest of Jerusalem.2 Israeli archaeologist Trude Dothan and I jointly directed this excavation for 14 seasons before we concluded in 1996.3 The excavation produced dramatic new evidence that has radically altered our understanding of Philistine history.
    [Show full text]
  • 001 004 Martin.Indd
    PREFACE This monograph is a collation of research on Late I reserve special gratitude to Prof. Eliezer D. Bronze Age Egyptian-type pottery in the southern Oren, Prof. Richard Zettler (Penn Museum), Prof. Levant that I conducted during the last ten years. An Larry E. Stager, Dr. Yuval Gadot, Dr. Ayelet Gilboa earlier stage of my investigation appears in my (the Department of Archaeology, University of Haifa) unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, submitted to Vienna and Dr. Ilan Sharon (the Institute of Archaeology, University (Austria) in 2005. Since receiving my Hebrew University of Jerusalem), who gave their per- Ph.D. I have published a number of articles on this mission to present previously unpublished vessels in topic and extended my inquiries to additional sites this volume. and to further aspects of the pottery under review. Special thanks go to Yaniv Agmon, Dr. John D.M. The person who made this entire endeavor possi- Green, Dr. Karin Kopetzky, Dr. Nava Panitz-Cohen, ble is Professor Manfred Bietak (Vienna University; Dr. Valentine Roux, Yossi Salmon and Ragna Stidsing, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna). Professor who generously contributed chapters to this volume. Bietak supported me from the outset of my journey My warmest thanks go to Myrna Pollak, who edited into scholarship in 1993. He introduced me to field the manuscript, and to Dr. Angela Schwab, the pro- archaeology and ceramic studies and nurtured my duction editor. Yulia Gottlieb kindly supported me in interest in the relationship between Egypt and the enhancement of drawings and in the arrange- Canaan. He was my M.A.
    [Show full text]