DOCSLIB.ORG

Shrub Tundras Finland Sweden O 0 Iceland B1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Barrens Prostrate-shrub tundras Finland Sweden o 0 Iceland B1. Cryptogam, P1. Prostrate dwarf- herb barren shrub, herb tundra Dry to wet barren Dry tundra with patchy landscapes with very B1 vegetation. Prostrate P1 sparse, very low-growing North Atlantic Ocean shrubs < 5 cm tall (such as plant cover. Scattered Dryas and Salix arctica) herbs, lichens, mosses, and are dominant, with liverworts. Subzone A and B, Norway graminoids and forbs. some C at higher elevations. Lichens are also common. Eskimonaesset, North Greenland, C. Bay Bunde Fjord, Axel Heiberg Island, Canada. D.A. Walker Bunde Fjord, 45 o Subzones B and C. o W Russia E 45 B2. Cryptogam barren P2. Prostrate/ complex (bedrock) Hemiprostrate Areas of exposed rock and dwarf-shrub tundra lichens interspersed with B2 Moist to dry tundra lakes and more vegetated P2 dominated by prostrate areas, as found on the and hemiprostrate shrubs Canadian Shield. Subzones Barents Pechora R. Greenland < 15 cm tall, particularly C and D. Sea Canada Cassiope. Subzone C. Daring Lake vicinity, Canada. D.A. Walker Daring Lake vicinity, Svalbard Zackenberg, East Greenland, H.H. Christiansen Baffi n B3. Noncarbonate Island B3a mountain complex B3b Mountain vegetation on Erect-shrub tundras Ob R. noncarbonate bedrock. The S1. Erect dwarf- B3c variety and size of plants decrease with elevation and shrub tundra B3d latitude. Hatching color and Tundra dominated by erect code indicate the bioclimate dwarf-shrubs, mostly < 40 Novaya S1 B3e subzone at the mountain cm tall. Subzone D. base. B3a through B3e Daniëls Qingertivaq Fjord, SE Greenland. F.J.A. Zemlya Baffi n Bay B3n indicate subzones A through E; B3n indicates noncarbonate nunatak Daring Lake, Canada. D.A. Walker areas. For more explanation Franz Josef see reverse side. S2. Low-shrub Land tundra B4. Carbonate Tundra dominated by B4b Kara low shrubs > 40 cm tall. mountain complex Hudson Bay S2 Sea Subzone E. B4c Mountain vegetation on carbonate bedrock. The B4d variety and size of plants decrease with elevation and Yenisey R. B4e latitude. Hatching color and Ellesmere Alaska. D.A. Walker Seward Peninsula, code indicate the bioclimate o Island 90 E 90o W B4n subzone at the mountain Brooks Range, Alaska. D.A. Walker Brooks Range, Wetlands base. B4b through B4e indicate subzones B through E; B4n indicates W1. Sedge/grass, Severnaya carbonate nunatak areas. moss wetland For more explanation see Zemlya R. Wetland complexes in the son reverse side. l colder areas of the Arctic, W1 Ne dominated by sedges, grasses, and mosses. Graminoid tundras Subzones B and C. Arctic Ocean Canada G1. Rush/grass, forb, Russia Resolute, Cornwallis Island, Canada. D.A. Walker cryptogam tundra Moist tundra with W2. Sedge, moss, dwarf-shrub wetland G1 moderate to complete cover of very low-growing Wetland complexes in the plants. Mostly grasses, Reindeer milder areas of the Arctic, Lake W2 rushes, forbs, mosses, Laptev Sea Victoria dominated by sedges, lichens, and liverworts. Island grasses, and mosses, but Subzones A and B. including dwarf shrubs < 40 Amund Ringnes Island, Canada. D.A. Walker o N cm tall. Subzone D. A r 80 Lake ctic Banks New Siberian Island Athabasca Alaska. D.A. Walker North Slope coastal plain, Cir Islands Great Slave W3. Sedge, moss, G2. Graminoid, c Lake le Slave R. low-shrub wetland prostrate dwarf-shrub, Lena R. forb tundra Great Bear Wetland complexes in the Lake warmer areas of the Arctic, W3 Moist to dry tundra, a R. G2 c s dominated by sedges and with open to continuous Vi aba low shrubs > 40 cm tall. plant cover. Sedges are h ly t uy A Subzone E. dominant, along with R. M prostrate shrubs < 5 cm ackenzie R. tall. Subzone C, some B. Talbot Alaska. S.S. Delta, Yukon-Kuskokwim Eureka vicinity, Ellesmere Island, Canada. D.A. Walker Eureka vicinity, East Siberian Beaufort Sea Sea 135 Liar o d R. G3. Nontussock W Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map sedge, dwarf-shrub, Ald CAVM Mapping Team: moss tundra en R. Canada: William A. Gould, Lawrence C. Bliss, Sylvia A. Edlund, o E Canada Moist tundra dominated by Lena R. Martha K. Raynolds, Stephen C. Zoltai Greenland: Fred J. A. Daniëls, Christian Bay, Maike Wilhelm G3 135 Glossary sedges and dwarf shrubs Wrangel Iceland: Eythór Einarsson, Gudmundur Gundjónsson < 40 cm tall, with well- Arctic bioclimate zone: The region of this map; the bioclimate Herb: A fl owering plant with no signifi cant woody tissue above Norway/Svalbard: Arve Elvebakk, Bernt E. Johansen Island zone north of the climatic limit of trees that is characterized by ground. Herbaceous plants include forbs and graminoids. Russia: Galina V. Ananjeva, Dmitry S. Drozdov, Adrian E. Katenin, developed moss layer. an Arctic climate, Arctic fl ora, and tundra vegetation. It includes Nunatak: A nonglaciated area surrounded by glaciers, often a Sergei S. Kholod, Lyudmila A. Konchenko, Yuri V. Korostelev, Evgeny S. Melnikov, Natalia G. Moskalenko, Alexei N. Polezhaev, Olga E. Ponomareva, Barren patches due to all the arctic tundra regions with an Arctic climate and Arctic mountain peak taller than the surrounding glaciers. fl ora, but it excludes tundra regions that have a boreal fl ora such Elena B. Pospelova, Irina N. Safronova, Raisa P. Shelkunova, Boris A. Yurtsev frost boils and periglacial Kolyma R. Chukchi United States/Alaska: Martha K. Raynolds, Michael D. Fleming, Carl J. Markon, Ambarchik, Yakutia, Russia, D.A. Walker Ambarchik, Yakutia, as the boreal oceanic areas of Iceland and the Aleutian Islands, Physiognomy: The general outward appearance of a plant features are common. Sea and alpine tundra regions south of the latitudinal treeline. community, determined by the life forms of the dominant species, David F. Murray, Stephen S. Talbot, Donald A. Walker e.g., grassland, forest, tundra. Subzones D and C, some E. About the CAVM Bioclimate zone: A region of the Earth’s surface with Project Director: characteristic climate, fl ora, and vegetation. Bioclimate subzones Plant functional type: A category of plants based on factors Donald A. Walker The Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (CAVM) shows the types of vegetation that occur are subdivisions based on a combination of fl oristic composition, such as growth form, size and taxonomic status. The tundra plant Compilation and Cartography by: Produced by: functional types used in the map-unit names include graminoids, G4. Tussock-sedge, across the Arctic, between the ice-covered Arctic Ocean to the north and the northern limit of dominant plant community structure (physiognomy), and the Martha K. Raynolds and Hilmar A. Maier Natalie G. Trahan (Johnson Controls Inc.), suite of plant communities in common habitats (See Table 1, forbs, shrubs of various stature, and cryptogams (mosses and Alaska Geobotany Center Tammy M. Charron, forests to the south. Environmental and climatic conditions are extreme, with a short growing on R. dwarf-shrub, moss United reverse side). The bioclimate subzones used here are adopted with lichens). (See these categories for further explanation.) Institute of Arctic Biology Beth A.Vairin, Susan M. Lauritzen Yuk tundra season and low summer temperatures. The region supports plants such as dwarf shrubs, herbs, States modifi cation from the phytogeographic subzones of Yurtsev (1994) Riparian: An intrazonal habitat pertaining to streamside University of Alaska Fairbanks USGS National Wetlands Research Center Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 USA 700 Cajundome Blvd. Moist tundra, dominated lichens and mosses, which grow close to the ground. As one moves southward (outward from and the bioclimate zones of the Panarctic Flora Initiative (Elvebakk environments. G4 et al. 1999). Lafayette, Louisiana 70506 USA by tussock cottongrass map’s center in all directions), the amount of warmth available for plant growth increases Shrub: A woody perennial plant differing from a tree by its lower Carbonate: Refers to limestone or dolomite bedrock. These stature and by producing several basal stems instead of a single Funded by: considerably. Warmer summer temperatures cause the size, abundance, and variety of plants U.S. National Science Foundation grant number OPP-9908-829, U.S. Fish and Wildlife (Eriophorum vaginatum) . bedrock types result in soils with high calcium content, trunk. This group includes: tall shrub, greater than 2 m tall (e.g., Service, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Bureau of Land Management. and dwarf shrubs <40 cm to increase. Climate and other environmental controls, such as landscape, topography, soil dyr R high pH, and plant communities adapted to such conditions. Alnus crispus, Salix alaxensis); low shrub, between 0.4 and 2 Ana tall. Mosses are abundant. chemistry, soil moisture, and the available plants that historically colonized an area, also Noncarbonate refers to sandstone, granite, or other rock types m tall (e.g., Betula glandulosa, Salix glauca); and dwarf shrub, Suggested Citation: with few carbonates. less than 0.4 m tall. Dwarf shrubs are further divided into erect CAVM Team. 2003. Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map. Scale 1:7,500,000. Subzone E, some D. infl uence the distribution of plant communities. dwarf shrub, less than 0.4 m tall with erect stems (e.g., Vaccinium Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Map No. 1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Imnavait Creek, Alaska. D. A. Walker Cryptogam: A plant that reproduces sexually without forming uliginosum, Ledum decumbens, Betula nana); hemiprostrate Service, Anchorage, Alaska. The colors on the map indicate the differences that occur in the general outward appearance seeds. This group includes many common tundra ground plants, dwarf shrub, very short, generally less than 0.15 m tall, with of vegetation (physiognomy). The CAVM team grouped over 400 described plant Gulf of such as lichens, symbiotic associations of algae and fungi, and a semi-erect or trailing stem (refers here mainly to Cassiope Web sites: www.geobotany.uaf.edu, www.caff.is Glaciers mosses, members of the class Musci.
Recommended publications
  • Willows of Interior Alaska

    Willows of Interior Alaska

    1 Willows of Interior Alaska Dominique M. Collet US Fish and Wildlife Service 2004 2 Willows of Interior Alaska Acknowledgements The development of this willow guide has been made possible thanks to funding from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service- Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge - order 70181-12-M692. Funding for printing was made available through a collaborative partnership of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Alaska, Department of Defense; Pacific North- west Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture; National Park Service, and Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; and Bonanza Creek Long Term Ecological Research Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks. The data for the distribution maps were provided by George Argus, Al Batten, Garry Davies, Rob deVelice, and Carolyn Parker. Carol Griswold, George Argus, Les Viereck and Delia Person provided much improvement to the manuscript by their careful editing and suggestions. I want to thank Delia Person, of the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, for initiating and following through with the development and printing of this guide. Most of all, I am especially grateful to Pamela Houston whose support made the writing of this guide possible. Any errors or omissions are solely the responsibility of the author. Disclaimer This publication is designed to provide accurate information on willows from interior Alaska. If expert knowledge is required, services of an experienced botanist should be sought. Contents
  • Towards Rainy Arctic Winters: Experimental Icing

    Towards Rainy Arctic Winters: Experimental Icing

    Supplementary material to: Towards rainy Arctic winters: experimental icing impacts tundra plant productivity and reproduction Mathilde Le Moullec, Anna-Lena Hendel, Matteo Petit Bon, Ingibjörg Svala Jónsdóttir, Øystein Varpe, René van der Wal, Larissa Teresa Beumer, Kate Layton-Matthews, Ketil Isaksen and Brage Bremset Hansen. Table of content: Table S1. Soil volumetric water content. Table S2. Sampling dates and number of repeated measurements. Table S3. Correlation coefficients between maximum NDVI and relative abundance. Table S4. Summary statistic of Salix polaris phenophases. Figure S1. Mesic habitat species composition. Figure S2. Estimated NDVI curves across treatments and years. Figure S3. Annual relative abundance. Figure S4. Ordination of the mesic community species composition. Figure S5. Leaf size traits of Salis polaris across years and treatments. Figure S6. Flower counts per year, treatment and species/group. Figure S7. Annual probability curves of Salix polaris phenophases. Table S1. Soil volumetric water content (i.e., soil moisture in %) measured with a ML3 ThetaProbe Sensor (HH2 Soil Moisture Meter from Delta-T Devices Ltd, UK, 1% accuracy, 5-10 cm depth) via repeated measurements at five points per plot, 3-15 times per summer (rounds). a) Soil moisture estimates and 95% CI per treatment and year, b) Pearson correlation coefficients between soil moisture and sub-surface (5 cm depth) temperature for years with repeated measurements across the growing season (2018-2019, df = 18). To compute these correlation coefficients we first fitted separate models for moisture and temperature , with treatment × day-of-year (factor) included as fixed effect, and repeated point measurements nested within plots nested within blocks included as random intercept structure.
  • Sanionia Uncinata and Salix Polaris As Bioindicators of Trace Element Pollution in the High Arctic: a Case Study at Longyearbyen, Spitsbergen, Norway

    Sanionia Uncinata and Salix Polaris As Bioindicators of Trace Element Pollution in the High Arctic: a Case Study at Longyearbyen, Spitsbergen, Norway

    Polar Biology (2019) 42:1287–1297 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-019-02517-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Sanionia uncinata and Salix polaris as bioindicators of trace element pollution in the High Arctic: a case study at Longyearbyen, Spitsbergen, Norway Bronisław Wojtuń1 · Ludmiła Polechońska1 · Paweł Pech1 · Kinga Mielcarska1 · Aleksandra Samecka‑Cymerman1 · Wojciech Szymański2 · Maria Kolon1 · Marcin Kopeć1 · Kornelia Stadnik1 · Alexander J. Kempers3 Received: 27 August 2018 / Revised: 27 May 2019 / Accepted: 8 June 2019 / Published online: 19 June 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Longyearbyen (Spitsbergen) is infuenced by local contamination sources, such as exhausts from power plants, trafc, coal mines, and industrial waste dumps subject to weathering, which threatens soil and living organisms. Therefore, the trace element level in this area needs to be evaluated. The moss Sanionia uncinata and prostrate dwarf-shrub Salix polaris were collected as contamination indicators. Concentrations of Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn in these species were measured. The tested hypotheses were: in Longyearbyen and its vicinity (1) the moss S. uncinata and the willow S. polaris may be used as phytoaccumulators and therefore as bioindicators and bioremediators of certain trace elements; (2) the moss S. uncinata contains higher concentrations of metals than the willow S. polaris. The soil of Longyearbyen was contaminated with Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn. The willow S. polaris may be used in phytoaccumulation and therefore in the bioremedia- tion and bioindication of Cd and Zn from its environment. Stems of S. polaris from Longyearbyen are better bioindicators of Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, and Pb and poorer bioindicators of Cd, Mn, and Zn than leaves of this species.
  • Vascular Plants of Kluane

    Vascular Plants of Kluane

    26 Blueleaved strawberry Fragaria virginiana 63 Greyleaf willow Salix glauca Kluane National Park and Reserve 27 Bog blueberrry Vaccinium uliginosum 64 Ground cedar, Lycopodium complanatum 28 Bog labrador-tea Ledum groenlandica Creeping jenny 65 Hairy rockcress Arabis hirsuta 29 Boreal aster Aster alpinus 30 Boreal wormwood Artemisia arctica 66 Heart-leaf listera Listera borealis Vascular 31 Bristly stickseed Lappula myosotis 67 Heartleaf arnica Arnica cordifolia 32 Broadglumed wheatgrass Agropyron trachycaulum 68 High bush cranbery Viburnum edule Plants List 33 Broadleaf lupine Lupinus arcticus 69 Holboell's rockcress Arabis holboellii 34 Buffaloberry, Soapberry Sheperdia canadensis 70 Horned dandelion Taraxacum lacerum 35 Canada butterweed Senecio pauperculus 71 Kotzebue's grass-of- Parnassia kotzebuei 36 Chestnut rush Juncus castaneus parnassus 1 Alaska moss heath Cassiope stelleriana 37 Cleft-leaf groundsel Senecio streptanthifolius 72 Kuchei's lupine Lupinus kuschei 2 Alaska willow Salix alaxensis 38 Common horsetail Equisetum arvense 73 Labrador lousewort Pedicularis labradorica 3 Alkali bluegrass Poa juncifolia 39 Common mountain Juniperus communis 74 Lance-leaved draba Draba lanceolata 4 Alkali grass Puccinellia interior juniper 75 Lanceleaved stonecrop Sedum lanceolatum 5 Alpine bluegrass Poa alpina 40 Cow parsnip Heracleum lanatum 76 Lapland cassiope Cassiope tetragona 6 Alpine fescue Festuca ovina 41 Creeping juniper Juniperus horizontalis 77 Leafless pyrola Pyrola asarifolia 7 Alpine milk-vetch Astragalus alpinus 42 Creeping
  • Abstracts Annual Scientific Meeting ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᕐᓯᐅᑎᒥᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᓂᕐᒃ

    Abstracts Annual Scientific Meeting ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᕐᓯᐅᑎᒥᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᓂᕐᒃ

    Abstracts Annual Scientific Meeting ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᕐᓯᐅᑎᒥᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᓂᕐᒃ 2016 Réunion scientifique annuelle 5-9/12/2016, Winnipeg, MB ASM2016 Conference Program Oral Presentation and Poster Abstracts ABSTRACTS FROBISHER BAY: A NATURAL LABORATORY complete habitat characterization. This recent sampling FOR THE STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL effort recorded heterogeneous substrates composed of CHANGE IN CANADIAN ARCTIC MARINE various proportions of boulder, cobbles, gravel, sand HABITATS. and mud forming a thin veneer over bedrock at water depths less than 200 metres. Grab samples confirm Aitken, Alec (1), B. Misiuk (2), E. Herder (2), E. the relative abundance of mollusks, ophiuroids and Edinger (2), R. Deering (2), T. Bell (2), D. Mate(3), C. tubiculous polychaetes as constituents of the infauna Campbell (4), L. Ham (5) and V.. Barrie (6) in the inner bay. Drop video images captured a diverse (1) University of Saskatchewan (Saskatoon, Canada); epifauna not previously described from the FRBC (2) Department of Geography, Memorial University of research. A variety of bryozoans, crinoid echinoderms, Newfoundland (St. John’s, NL, Canada); sponges and tunicates recorded in the images remain (3) Polar Knowledge Canada (Ottawa, Ontario, to be identified. Habitat characterization will allow us Canada); to quantify ecological change in benthic invertebrate (4) Marine Resources Geoscience, Geological Survey of species composition within the habitat types represented Canada (Dartmouth, NS, Canada); at selected sampling stations through time. Such long- (5) Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office, Natural term studies are crucial for distinguishing directional Resources Canada (Iqaluit, NU, Canada); change in ecosystems. Marine Geological Hazards (6) Marine Geoscience, Geological Survey of Canada and Seabed Disturbance: Extensive multibeam (Sidney, BC, Canada) echosounding surveys have recorded more than 250 submarine slope failures in inner Frobisher Bay.
  • Temperature Sensitivity of Willow Dwarf Shrub Growth from Two Distinct High Arctic Sites

    Temperature Sensitivity of Willow Dwarf Shrub Growth from Two Distinct High Arctic Sites

    Temperature sensitivity of willow dwarf shrub growth from two distinct High Arctic sites Buchwal, Agata; Weijers, Stef; Blok, Daan; Elberling, Bo Published in: International Journal of Biometeorology DOI: 10.1007/s00484-018-1648-6 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Buchwal, A., Weijers, S., Blok, D., & Elberling, B. (2019). Temperature sensitivity of willow dwarf shrub growth from two distinct High Arctic sites. International Journal of Biometeorology, 63(2), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-1648-6 Download date: 09. Apr. 2020 International Journal of Biometeorology (2019) 63:167–181 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-1648-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Temperature sensitivity of willow dwarf shrub growth from two distinct High Arctic sites Agata Buchwal1 & Stef Weijers2 & Daan Blok3 & Bo Elberling4 Received: 22 April 2018 /Revised: 8 November 2018 /Accepted: 10 November 2018 /Published online: 3 December 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract The High Arctic region has experienced marked climate fluctuations within the past decades strongly affecting tundra shrub growth. However, the spatial variability in dwarf shrub growth responses in this remote region remains largely unknown. This study characterizes temperature sensitivity of radial growth of two willow dwarf shrub species from two distinct High Arctic sites. The dwarf shrub Salix arctica from Northern Greenland (82°N), which has a dry continental High Arctic climate, is linked with Salix polaris from central Svalbard (78° N), which experiences a more oceanic High Arctic climate with relatively mild winters. We found similar positive and significant relationships between annual growth of both Salix dwarf shrub species and July–August air temperatures (1960–2010), despite different temperature regimes and shrub growth rates at the two sites.
  • Arctic and Boreal Plant Species Decline at Their Southern Range Limits in the Rocky Mountains

    Arctic and Boreal Plant Species Decline at Their Southern Range Limits in the Rocky Mountains

    Ecology Letters, (2017) 20: 166–174 doi: 10.1111/ele.12718 LETTER Arctic and boreal plant species decline at their southern range limits in the Rocky Mountains Abstract Peter Lesica1,2* and Climate change is predicted to cause a decline in warm-margin plant populations, but this hypoth- Elizabeth E. Crone3 esis has rarely been tested. Understanding which species and habitats are most likely to be affected is critical for adaptive management and conservation. We monitored the density of 46 populations representing 28 species of arctic-alpine or boreal plants at the southern margin of their ranges in the Rocky Mountains of Montana, USA, between 1988 and 2014 and analysed population trends and relationships to phylogeny and habitat. Marginal populations declined overall during the past two decades; however, the mean trend for 18 dicot populations was À5.8% per year, but only À0.4% per year for the 28 populations of monocots and pteridophytes. Declines in the size of peripheral populations did not differ significantly among tundra, fen and forest habitats. Results of our study support predicted effects of climate change and suggest that vulnerability may depend on phylogeny or associated anatomical/physiological attributes. Keywords arctic-alpine plants, boreal plants, climate change, fens, marginal populations, peripheral popula- tions, range margins, Rocky Mountains. Ecology Letters (2017) 20: 166–174 2009; Sexton et al. 2009; Brusca et al. 2013), which suggests INTRODUCTION that in some cases climate does not determine a species’ range. Climate of the earth is changing at an unprecedented rate Nonetheless, most plant ecologists believe that climate is an (Jackson & Overpeck 2000; IPCC 2013) and is predicted to important factor determining geographic range limits.
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24

    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24

    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
  • Spatial Variation in Arctic Hare (Lepus Arcticus) Populations Around the Hall Basin

    Spatial Variation in Arctic Hare (Lepus Arcticus) Populations Around the Hall Basin

    Spatial variation in Arctic hare (Lepus arcticus) populations around the Hall Basin Fredrik Dalerum1,2,3, Love Dalén2,4, Christina Fröjd5, Nicolas Lecomte6, Åsa Lindgren5, Tomas Meijer2,7, Patricia Pecnerova2,4, Anders Angerbjörn2 1 Research Unit of Biodiversity, Department of Biology of Organisms and Systems, University of Oviedo, Spain 2 Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Sweden 3 Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Pretoria, South Africa 4 Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Sweden 5 Swedish Polar Research Secretariat, Sweden 6 Canada Research Chair in Polar and Boreal Ecology and Centre d’Études Nordiques, Department of Biology, University of Moncton, Canada 7 Section for Wildlife Diseases, Swedish National Veterinary Institute, Travvägen 12A, 756 51 Uppsala, Sweden Published in Polar Biology, October 2017, Volume 40, Issue 10, pp 2113–2118 1 Abstract Arctic environments have relatively simple ecosystems. Yet, we still lack knowledge of the spatio- temporal dynamics of many Arctic organisms and how they are affected by local and regional processes. The Arctic hare (Lepus arcticus) is a large lagomorph endemic to high Arctic environments in Canada and Greenland. Current knowledge about this herbivore is scarce and the temporal and spatial dynamics of their populations are poorly understood. Here we present observations on Arctic hares in two sites on north Greenland (Hall and Washington lands) and one adjacent site on Ellesmere Island (Judge Daly Promontory). We recorded a large range of group sizes from 1 to 135 individuals, as well as a substantial variation in hare densities among the three sites (Hall land: 0 animals / 100 km2, Washington land 14.5-186.7 animals / 100 km2, Judge Daly Promontory 0.18-2.95 animals / 100 km2).
  • Supplement of Biogeosciences, 18, 2465–2485, 2021 © Author(S) 2021

    Supplement of Biogeosciences, 18, 2465–2485, 2021 © Author(S) 2021

    Supplement of Biogeosciences, 18, 2465–2485, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2465-2021-supplement © Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Supplement of Anthropocene climate warming enhances autochthonous carbon cycling in an upland Arctic lake, Disko Island, West Greenland Mark A. Stevenson et al. Correspondence to: Mark A. Stevenson ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the article licence. Table S1 Detailed vegetation composition surveys of the three study lakes local catchments, which form vegetation survey derived estimations of ground cover in Table 1. Disko 2 (%) Disko 1 (%) Disko 4 (%) Total moss/lichen 27.3 37.5 37.0 White moss 15.3 Grey moss 3.7 Green moss 1.3 12.2 7.9 Dead/decaying moss 1.2 3.6 Long green moss 2.1 Yellow moss 13.7 0.6 2.3 Cetraria nivalis lichen 6.8 3.2 Cladonia arbuscular lichen 5.2 Umbilicaria-type lichen 3.5 2.0 White lichen 0.7 16.4 Total plants 19.2 32.7 44.4 Salix arctica 5.3 5.2 8.9 Salix arctica seedling 6.0 11.0 14.0 Poaceae 1.6 5.1 2.1 Dead leaves/branches 0.7 2.4 2.2 Carex 5.8 4.7 Eriophorum spp. 0.4 Saxifraga 4.8 2.8 10.1 Plant roots 0.6 Chamerion latifolium 2.4 Total bare ground 53.5 29.8 18.6 Guano 3.0 0.1 Bare organic soil 10.8 13.2 Bare rock/gravel 53.5 16.1 5.2 No.
  • Guide to the Willows of Shoshone National Forest

    Guide to the Willows of Shoshone National Forest

    United States Department of Agriculture Guide to the Willows Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station of Shoshone National General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-83 Forest October 2001 Walter Fertig Stuart Markow Natural Resources Conservation Service Cody Conservation District Abstract Fertig, Walter; Markow, Stuart. 2001. Guide to the willows of Shoshone National Forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-83. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 79 p. Correct identification of willow species is an important part of land management. This guide describes the 29 willows that are known to occur on the Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming. Keys to pistillate catkins and leaf morphology are included with illustrations and plant descriptions. Key words: Salix, willows, Shoshone National Forest, identification The Authors Walter Fertig has been Heritage Botanist with the University of Wyoming’s Natural Diversity Database (WYNDD) since 1992. He has conducted rare plant surveys and natural areas inventories throughout Wyoming, with an emphasis on the desert basins of southwest Wyoming and the montane and alpine regions of the Wind River and Absaroka ranges. Fertig is the author of the Wyoming Rare Plant Field Guide, and has written over 100 technical reports on rare plants of the State. Stuart Markow received his Masters Degree in botany from the University of Wyoming in 1993 for his floristic survey of the Targhee National Forest in Idaho and Wyoming. He is currently a Botanical Consultant with a research emphasis on the montane flora of the Greater Yellowstone area and the taxonomy of grasses. Acknowledgments Sincere thanks are extended to Kent Houston and Dave Henry of the Shoshone National Forest for providing Forest Service funding for this project.
  • Cyperaceae of Alberta

    Cyperaceae of Alberta

    AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE CYPERACEAE OF ALBERTA Compiled and writen by Linda Kershaw and Lorna Allen April 2019 © Linda J. Kershaw & Lorna Allen This key was compiled using information primarily from and the Flora North America Association (2008), Douglas et al. (1998), and Packer and Gould (2017). Taxonomy follows VASCAN (Brouillet, 2015). The main references are listed at the end of the key. Please try the key this summer and let us know if there are ways in which it can be improved. Over the winter, we hope to add illustrations for most of the entries. The 2015 S-ranks of rare species (S1; S1S2; S2; S2S3; SU, according to ACIMS, 2015) are noted in superscript ( S1; S2;SU) after the species names. For more details go to the ACIMS web site. Similarly, exotic species are followed by a superscript X, XX if noxious and XXX if prohibited noxious (X; XX; XXX) according to the Alberta Weed Control Act (2016). CYPERACEAE SedgeFamily Key to Genera 1b 01a Flowers either ♂ or ♀; ovaries/achenes enclosed in a sac-like or scale-like structure 1a (perigynium) .....................Carex 01b Flowers with both ♂ and ♀ parts (sometimes some either ♂ or ♀); ovaries/achenes not in a perigynium .........................02 02a Spikelets somewhat fattened, with keeled scales in 2 vertical rows, grouped in ± umbrella- shaped clusters; fower bristles (perianth) 2a absent ....................... Cyperus 02b Spikelets round to cylindrical, with scales 2b spirally attached, variously arranged; fower bristles usually present . 03 03a Achenes tipped with a rounded protuberance (enlarged style-base; tubercle) . 04 03b Achenes without a tubercle (achenes 3a 3b often beaked, but without an enlarged protuberence) .......................05 04a Spikelets single; stems leafess .