4.3 Montgomery Bus Boycott

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4.3 Montgomery Bus Boycott EVERFI 306: AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORY 4.3 MONTGOMERY BUS BOYCOTT Introduction One day in 1955, Rosa Parks boarded her usual bus like she did every day after work. She paid her fare, walked to the back of the bus and sat in the very front row of the “colored” section. During this time, buses were segregated, meaning there were different sections for white and African-American riders. As more people got on Rosa’s bus the driver got up and moved the “colored” sign back a row to make room for white riders. This meant that the row Rosa was sitting in was now in the “whites only” section. The driver asked Rosa and the other African-American riders to get up so the white passengers could sit down. It happened every day. But Rosa Parks was tired. She wasn’t tired from working, at least no more than usual. She was tired of giving in. Describing the event, Rosa said, “We didn’t move at the beginning, but he says, ‘Let me have these seats.’ And the other three people moved, but I didn’t.” In fact, when the man next to her got up, she moved from the aisle seat to the window. Rosa Parks said years later, “When that driver stepped back toward us, when he waved his hand and ordered us up and out of our seats, I felt a determination cover my body like a quilt on a winter night.” The driver asked her again to move, but she refused. He then called the police, who came to arrest her. Rosa Parks was arrested and then bailed out of jail a few hours later. By Sunday, plans for a bus boycott were announced at churches all over Montgomery. There was even a front page article about the incident in the morning paper, The Montgomery Advertiser. The leaders of the boycott had three demands. One, that everyone be treated with courtesy. Two, that African American drivers would be hired to drive the bus routes. Three, that seating on the bus would be first-come, first-served. The original plan was that the boycott would be for the day of Rosa Park’s trial. But the boycott lasted far longer than one day, it lasted nearly 13 months! Before long its effect would be felt across the entire country. EVERFI 306: AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORY 4.3 MONTGOMERY BUS BOYCOTT Let’s explore what happened. Content * The Montgomery Improvement Association (MIA) organized the bus boycott. Lead by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. the original aim of the boycott was that no one would ride city buses on Monday, December 5, the day of Rosa Parks trial. Instead, the boycott lasted for over a year and nearly bankrupted the city bus system. The city eventually passed an ordinance (a city law) that desegregated the buses. * Martin Luther King Jr. was the pastor at Dexter Avenue Baptist Church, a center for organizing the bus boycott. To support the boycott, African-American taxi drivers charged 10 cents a ride (the same as bus fare). On December 8, 1955, the city ordered that any cab driver who charged less than 45 cents would pay a fine. In response, the MIA organized a carpool with over 300 cars. * On January 30, 1956 opponents of the boycott threw a stick of dynamite onto the porch of Martin Luther King Jr.’s home. His wife, Coretta Scott King was in the living room when they heard it land. They ran to the back room where King’s daughter, Yolanda, was sleeping. The dynamite exploded, shattering front windows and blowing a hole in the porch. * Three-fourths of the riders on Montgomery buses were African American, and many of the remaining customers were either sympathetic to or uncomfortable with the boycott. During the boycott, at rush hour, the sidewalks were clogged with people walking home. * Rosa Parks was not the first person to protest discrimination on the buses. Several people, including Aurelia Browder, had already refused to stand. During the Boycott, the US District Court (a Federal court) ruled in Browder v. Gayle that segregated buses violated the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This states that all citizens have a right to equal protection under the law (equal protection meaning that the laws must apply equally to all people). On December 20, 1956 all buses in Alabama were desegregated..
Recommended publications
  • Black History Month Friday Morning Meeting 2018
    Black History Month Friday Morning Meeting 2018 Quiz Questions and Answers 1) Do you know when the idea of Black History Month was established? Answer: Black History month has been nationally recognized since 1976, although Dr. Carter G. Woodson created it in 1926. Growing out of “Negro History Week”, which was celebrated between Abraham Lincoln’s birthday (February 12) and Frederick Douglass’ birthday (February 20), it is a designated time in which the achievements of Black people are recognized. 2) Do you know how long the Pan-African flag has existed? Answer: The Pan-African flag was created in 1920 to represent the pride of African- American people. The red band is for the “blood that unifies African descendants”, the black is to affirm the existence of Black people and green reminds people about the “vegetation of the motherland”. 3) Do you know how many museums in the United States are dedicated to African- American culture or history? Answer: There are over 150 museums dedicated to African-American culture and history in the country. The first was established in 1868 at the historically Black college, Hampton University in Hampton, VA. The largest museum was the Charles H. Wright museum of Detroit, Michigan, which was founded in 1965. However, the National Museum of African-American History and Culture completed in 2016 has exceeded it in size. 4) Do you know how many visits to the National Museum of African American History and Culture have been recorded since its opening? Answer: The Smithsonian Institution has a museum dedicated to African-American culture and history? Located in the heart of Washington, D.C., it has over 36,000 artifacts highlighting subjects like community, the arts, civil rights, and slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Rights Done Right – Browder V. Gayle
    Civil Rights Done Right A Tool for Teaching the Movement Browder v. Gayle sample TEACHING TOLERANCE Table of Contents Introduction 2 STEP ONE Self Assessment 3 Lesson Inventory 4 Pre-Teaching Reflection 5 STEP TWO The "What" of Teaching the Movement 6 Essential Content Areas 7 Essential Content Coverage Sample 8 Essential Content Checklist 9 STEP THREE The "How" of Teaching the Movement 11 Implementing the Five Essential Practices Sample 12 Essential Practices Checklist 13 STEP FOUR Planning for Teaching the Movement 14 Instructional Matrix, Section 1 Sample 15 STEP FIVE Teaching the Movement 19 Post-Teaching Reflection 20 © 2016 Teaching Tolerance CIVIL RIGHTS DONE RIGHT: BROWDER V. GAYLE SAMPLE // 1 TEACHING TOLERANCE Civil Rights Done Right A Tool for Teaching the Movement Not long ago, Teaching Tolerance issued Teaching the Movement, a report evaluating how well social studies standards in all 50 states support teaching about the modern civil rights movement. Our report showed that few states emphasize the movement or provide classroom support for teaching this history effectively. We followed up these findings by releasingThe March Continues: Five Essential Practices for Teaching the Civil Rights Movement, a set of guiding principles for educators who want to improve upon the simplified King-and-Parks-centered narrative many state standards offer. Those essential practices are: 1. Educate for empowerment. 2. Know how to talk about race. 3. Capture the unseen. 4. Resist telling a simple story. 5. Connect to the present. Civil Rights Done Right offers a detailed set of curriculum improvement strategies for classroom instructors who want to apply these practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory of the Civil Rights Movement in Textbooks, Juvenile Biography, and Museums
    ABSTRACT JOHNSON, CHRISTINE RENEE GOULD. Celebrating a National Myth: Memory of The Civil Rights Movement in Textbooks, Juvenile Biography, and Museums. (Under the direction of Dr. Katherine Mellen Charron). The Civil Rights Movement (CRM) is commemorated at movement anniversaries, during Black History Month, and every Martin Luther King Jr. Day. However, some historians argue these public versions do not tell a full story of the CRM, over-simplifying it and portraying it as a story of inevitable progress. Relying on a “mythic” version of this critical event in the nation’s history, the mainstream narrative has little explanatory power. This makes it easier for some to dismiss ongoing struggles for racial equality and more difficult for future generations to learn from movement’s successes and failures. This thesis examines other kinds of CRM history that inform the public. Many learn about the movement as youth through educational mediums like high school textbooks and children’s literature, and people of all ages encounter it in museums. I ask what version of CRM history each of these present, inquiring how interpretations have evolved over time and the degree to which they reflect changes in scholarship. Spanning a total of fifty-four years, this study finds surprisingly little change in textbook narratives beyond token additions that nod to some advancements in the historiography. Juvenile biographies of CRM luminaries published in recent decades present a deeper history, often with a longer chronology, but relay an overly optimistic outlook about what the movement accomplished. Civil rights museums in the South vary in their depictions, with the strongest interpretations appearing in the most recently opened or renovated.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E1454 HON
    E1454 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks November 15, 2019 enthusiasm that could affect anyone who Turkey, where increasingly authoritarian lead- Representative Holland served in the State heard his lectures or commentary. ers are undermining democracy and the rule House of Representatives for 36 years and Among the many awards he earned over his of law. We owe it to President Wałe¸sa and all proudly represented Mississippi’s 16th district. career were three commendations from the the others who continue to fight for democracy During his extensive career, Representative Virginia General Assembly, the Virginia Press in the region to show our support. Holland served on many committees, includ- Association’s 2004 Virginian of the Year, the I want to close by thanking President ing: the Committee on Public Health and Best NonFiction Book Award by the Library of Wałe¸sa for everything he has done in support Human Services, Appropriations, Congres- Virginia in 1997, and the Outstanding Pro- of freedom and democracy, and for visiting sional Redistricting, Gaming, Judiciary A, Judi- fessor Award of the Virginia Council for Higher with us today. And I want to urge everyone ciary En Banc, Budget, Legislative Reappor- Education. In turn, Dr. Robertson strongly sup- that we can best honor President Wałe¸sa’s tionment, Medicaid, Local and Private Legisla- ported Virginia Tech financially and through legacy by continuing the fight against tion, Tourism, Transportation, Fees and Sala- the donation of a large portion of his enor- authoritarianism wherever we may find it. ries of Public Officers, Ways and Means, and mous collection of Civil War books.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the Modern Civil Rights Movement
    Women in the Modern Civil Rights Movement Introduction Research Questions Who comes to mind when considering the Modern Civil Rights Movement (MCRM) during 1954 - 1965? Is it one of the big three personalities: Martin Luther to Consider King Jr., Malcolm X, or Rosa Parks? Or perhaps it is John Lewis, Stokely Who were some of the women Carmichael, James Baldwin, Thurgood Marshall, Ralph Abernathy, or Medgar leaders of the Modern Civil Evers. What about the names of Septima Poinsette Clark, Ella Baker, Diane Rights Movement in your local town, city or state? Nash, Daisy Bates, Fannie Lou Hamer, Ruby Bridges, or Claudette Colvin? What makes the two groups different? Why might the first group be more familiar than What were the expected gender the latter? A brief look at one of the most visible events during the MCRM, the roles in 1950s - 1960s America? March on Washington, can help shed light on this question. Did these roles vary in different racial and ethnic communities? How would these gender roles On August 28, 1963, over 250,000 men, women, and children of various classes, effect the MCRM? ethnicities, backgrounds, and religions beliefs journeyed to Washington D.C. to march for civil rights. The goals of the March included a push for a Who were the "Big Six" of the comprehensive civil rights bill, ending segregation in public schools, protecting MCRM? What were their voting rights, and protecting employment discrimination. The March produced one individual views toward women of the most iconic speeches of the MCRM, Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a in the movement? Dream" speech, and helped paved the way for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and How were the ideas of gender the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther and Coretta Scott King Library
    At James Madison University Martin Luther and Coretta Scott King Library Book Catalog Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. 2003. Nonviolence and Peace Building in Islam: Theory and Practice. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. Ackerman, Peter and Jack Duvall. 2000. A Force More Powerful: A Century of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Palgrave. Agrawal, A. N. 2005. The Rupa Book of Gandhi Quiz. New Delhi: Rupa. Alter, Joseph S. 2000. Gandhi’s Body: Sex, Diet, and the Politics of Nationalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Andrews, Charles F. 2003. Mahatma Gandhi: His Life and Ideas. Woodstock: First SkyLight Paths Publishing. Arendt, Hannah. 1970. On Violence. New York: Harcourt Brace. Arnold, David. 2001. Gandhi: Profiles in Power. Harlow: Pearson Education. Ashe, Geoffrey. 1968. Gandhi: A Biography. New York: Cooper Square Press. Attenborough, Richard, ed. 1982. The Words of Gandhi. New York: Newmarket Press. Badruddin. 2003. Global Peace and Anti-Nuclear Movements. New Delhi: Mittal Publications. Balagangadhara, S. N. 2005. “The Heathen in His Blindness”: Asia, the West and the Dynamic of Religion. New Delhi: Manohar. Barak, Gregg. 2003. Violence and Nonviolence: Pathways to Understanding. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. 2 / King Library Book Catalog Barash, David P., ed. 2000. Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies. New York: Oxford University Press. Batra, Shakti, ed. N.d. The Quintessence of Gandhi in His Own Words. New Delhi: Madhu Muskan Publications. Betai, Ramesh S. 2002. Gita and Gandhiji. New Delhi: Gyan Publishing. Bharucha, Rustom. 1993. The Question of Faith. New Delhi: Orient Longman. Bloom, Irene, J. Paul Martin, and Wayne L. Proudfoot, eds. 1996. Religious Diversity and Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Montgomery Bus Boycott, 1956 Contents
    History In-Service Team, Supporting Leaving Certificate History. www.hist.ie Later Modern, Europe and the Wider World Topic 6: The United States and the World, 1945-89 Documents for Case Study: The Montgomery Bus Boycott, 1956 Contents Introduction to the series of documents page 2 Introduction to documents relating to the case study, “Montgomery Bus Boycott,1956” page 3 Biographical Notes page 4 Glossary page 6 Documents 1 to 12, contents page page 9 Documents page 10 This material is intended for educational, classroom use only, not to be reproduced in any other medium or forum without permission. Efforts have been made to trace, and acknowledge, copyright holders. In the case where a copyright has been inadvertently overlooked, the copyright holders are requested to contact the HIST administrator. © 2006 History In-Service Team, Monaghan Education Centre, Monaghan, Co. Monaghan Tel: 047 74008 Fax: 047 74029 email: [email protected] web site: www.hist.ie Introduction to the Series of Documents The USA topic (Later Modern Europe, Topic 6, The United States and the world, 1949-1989) is nominated as the prescribed topic for documents-based study, for examination in June 2008 and June 2009. The case studies are: • The Montgomery bus boycott, 1956. • Lyndon Johnson and Vietnam, 1963-1968. • The Moon landing, 1969. The History In-Service Team [HIST] prepared an in-service day [autumn 2006] focusing on teachers’ needs in relation to this topic, with a variety of appropriate methodological approaches considered with reference to the syllabus aims, objectives and learning outcomes. Suitable sources of different types were also presented at this in-service session.
    [Show full text]
  • Daybreak of Freedom
    Daybreak of Freedom . Daubreak of The University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill and London Freedom The Montgomery Bus Boycott Edited by Stewart Burns © 1997 The University of North Carolina Press. All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Daybreak of freedom : the Montgomery bus boycott / edited by Stewart Burns, p cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 0-8078-2360-0 (alk. paper) — ISBN 0-8078-4661-9 (pbk.: alk. paper) i. Montgomery (Ala.)—Race relations—Sources. 2. Segregation in transportation—Alabama— Montgomery—History—20th century—Sources. 3. Afro-Americans—Civil rights—Alabama- Montgomery—History—2oth century—Sources. I. Title. F334-M79N39 *997 97~79°9 3O5.8'oo976i47—dc2i CIP 01 oo 99 98 97 54321 THIS BOOK WAS DIGITALLY MANUFACTURED. For Claudette Colvin, Jo Ann Robinson, Virginia Foster Durr, and all the other courageous women and men who made democracy come alive in the Cradle of the Confederacy This page intentionally left blank We are here in a general sense because first and foremost we are American citizens, and we are determined to apply our citizenship to the fullness of its meaning. We are here also because of our love for democracy, because of our deep-seated belief that democracy transformed from thin paper to thick action is the greatest form of government on earth. And you know, my friends, there comes a time when people get tired of being trampled over by the iron feet of oppression.
    [Show full text]
  • FANNIE LOU HAMER a Historical Time Line
    FANNIE LOU HAMER A Historical Time Line October 6, 1917 Fannie Lou Townsend is born in Montgomery County, Mississippi. May 21, 1918 The U.S. House of Representatives passes the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution, granting women the right to vote. February 14, 1920 The League of Women Voters is founded, with the goal of giving women a stronger role in public affairs. May 2, 1927 In Buck v. Bell, by a vote of 8–1, the U.S. Supreme Court affirms the constitutionality of Virginia’s law allowing state-enforced sterilization. In 1962, while undergoing surgery to remove a small tumor, Hamer will receive a hysterectomy without her consent or prior knowledge. 1944 Fannie Lou Townsend marries Perry “Pap” Hamer. May 17, 1954 In Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, the U.S. Supreme Court declares school segregation unconstitutional. May 6, 1960 The Civil Rights Act of 1960 is signed into law by President Eisenhower; it includes measures against discriminatory voting practices. 1963 Hamer finally succeeds in registering to vote. From June 9–12, she is arrested and brutally beaten while in police custody. 1964 Hamer runs for Congress in the Mississippi state Democratic primary. On June 19, after an eighty-three-day filibuster, the U.S. Senate passes the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. On August 22, in a televised appearance, Hamer addresses the Democratic National Convention’s Credentials Committee about the problems she encountered in registration and her beating in jail. President Johnson calls a press conference at the same time as her speech to prevent her voice from being heard, but her speech is aired later by many television networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Fannie Lou Hamer, Dorothy Height, and Viola Liuzzo: Not
    FANNIE LOU HAMER, DOROTHY HEIGHT, AND VIOLA LIUZZO: NOT JUST A DREAM, INITIATORS FOR EQUALITY by JENNIFER M. BARNETT DoVEANNA S. FULTON MINOR, COMMITTEE CHAIR BRITTNEY COOPER NIRMALA EREVELLES A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Women’s Studies in the Department of Gender and Race in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2012 Copyright Jennifer M. Barnett 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT This thesis uses the standpoint theory and lived experiences method, introduced by Patricia Hill Collins and Sandra Harding, to examine the lives of three women who were active in fighting for equality. My research indicates their motives for publicly fighting racism stem from their childhoods, a strong sense of social justice, and the desire to create a safer world. The first chapter discusses the Civil Rights Movement. I discuss gender roles, race, and class. The discussion of using structural violence, systematic oppression, accusations of mental instability, and disabilities are also introduced; showing how they all intersect during movements. The chapter presents the concept as whiteness as property, a concept researched and introduced by Cheryl I. Harris. The second chapter acknowledges the work of Dorothy Height. Height used her education, class standing to fight for equality. Facing sexism and racism, Height instigated many of the most well-known marches and platforms for equality among races; sharing the stage with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The third chapter recognizes Viola Liuzzo from Detroit, Michigan. Liuzzo came south to challenge the violence and mistreatment accompanying the struggle for civil rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther King Jr January 2021
    Connections Martin Luther King Jr January 2021 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PMB Administrative Services and the Office of Diversity, Inclusion and Civil Rights Message from the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Administrative Services January 2021 Dear Colleagues, The life and legacy of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., inspires me every day, particularly when the troubles of the world seem to have placed what appear to be insurmountable obstacles on the path to achieving Dr. King’s vision. Yet I know that those obstacles will eventually melt away when we focus our hearts and minds on finding solutions together. While serving as leaders of the civil rights movement, Dr. and Mrs. King raised their family in much the same way my dear parents raised my brothers and myself. It gives me comfort to know that at the end of the day, their family came together in love and faith the same way our family did, grateful for each other and grateful knowing the path ahead was illuminated by a shared dream of a fair and equitable world. This issue of Connections begins on the next page with wise words of introduction from our collaborative partner, Erica White-Dunston, Director of the Office of Diversity, Inclusion and Civil Rights. Erica speaks eloquently of Dr. King’s championing of equity, diversity and inclusion in all aspects of life long before others understood how critically important those concepts were in creating and sustaining positive outcomes. I hope you find as much inspiration and hope within the pages of this month’s Connections magazine as I did.
    [Show full text]
  • February 6, 2016 Hawaii Filipino Chronicle  1
    FeBruary 6, 2016 HawaII FIlIPIno CHronICle 1 ♦ FEBRUARY 6, 2016 ♦ Photo credit: Jason Moore BIG ISLAND MEMORIES LEGAL NOTES NON-FIcTION STORy sakada day In keeau ImmIgratIon raIds Cause love and sInulog FestIval Fear among ImmIgrant knows no In kona CommunItIes Bounds PRESORTED HAWAII FILIPINO cHRONIcLE STANDARD 94-356 WAIPAHU DEPOT RD., 2ND FLR. U.S. POSTAGE WAIPAHU, HI 96797 PAID HONOLULU, HI PERMIT NO. 9661 2 HawaII FIlIPIno CHronICle FeBruary 6, 2016 EDITORIALS FROM THE PUBLISHER Publisher & Executive Editor ung Hee Fat Choy! Just when Charlie Y. Sonido, M.D. More Filipinos Artists the newness and excitement of Publisher & Managing Editor 2016 has faded, there’s Chinese Chona A. Montesines-Sonido Making News New Year to celebrate. So in the Associate Editors Dennis Galolo | Edwin Quinabo ilipinos are headliners in sports, entertainment, spirit of Chinese New Year, K Contributing Editor beauty pageants and politics to name just a few. One which is officially observed on Belinda Aquino, Ph.D. field that tends to be overlooked is fine arts—and February 8, the Chronicle’s staff and edi- Creative Designer understandably so. Art is often an afterthought and torial board would like to wish our readers Junggoi Peralta a luxury in a Third World Country like the Philip- F a very happy, safe and prosperous Year of the Monkey. Photography pines where the majority of the people work extra For this issue’s cover story, contributing writer Carolyn Tim Llena hard to make ends meet. But with the recent successes of a grow- Administrative Assistant Weygan-Hildebrand introduces us to talented Filipino artist Shalimar Pagulayan ing number of Filipino artists, the international art world is notic- Philip Sabado whose paintings have delighted those fortunate columnists ing that pinoys are pretty damn good when it comes to visually enough to see them up-close-and-personal.
    [Show full text]