Helarctos Malayanus) By
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Effects of food distribution and external factors on the activity budgets of captive sun bears (Helarctos malayanus) by Jessica Barber A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE In Biology Committee Members: Dr. Karin Enstam Jaffe, Chair Dr. Dan Crocker Darren Minier i Copyright 2018 By Jessica Barber ii Authorization for Reproduction of Master’s Thesis I grant permission for the print or digital reproduction of this thesis in its entirety, without further authorization from me, on the condition that the person or agency requesting reproduction absorb the cost and provide acknowledgment of authorship. Date: 1 May 2018 Name: Jessica Barber iii Effects of food distribution and external factors on the activity budgets of captive sun bears (Helarctos malayanus) Thesis by Jessica Barber Abstract All free-ranging bears spend a large portion of their day on foraging activities. In captivity, many bear species spend less time or energy foraging because of the highly predictable schedule and presentation of their diets. To combat this, zoos are increasingly using enrichment to encourage animals to engage with their environment. I used principles of optimal foraging theory to test whether manipulating food distribution could be used as a type of enrichment to alter behavior for three adult female sun bears at Oakland Zoo in California. I compared the effects of scattered vs. clumped food distribution on the sun bears’ activity budgets using continuous focal animal sampling. In addition, temperature and visitor presence were also measured using scan sampling to measure the effect on the sun bears behaviors. The results indicate that manipulating food distribution successfully increased the duration of feeding behavior and frequency of foraging in captive sun bears when food was clumped. Higher temperatures and increased visitor presence was correlated with increased stereotypic pacing and nighthouse use by the study subjects. This study may provide zoos with a relatively simple and cost-effective way to incorporate existing diets and enrichment devices to enhance animal welfare by focusing on the distribution of items. More broadly, these results may inform research into the behavioral ecology of sun bears, whose natural foraging behavior is little known. MS Program: Biology Date: 1 May 2018 Sonoma State University iv Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Study Site and Animals .................................................................................................................................... 6 Food Distribution ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Sun Bear Behavior .............................................................................................................................................. 7 External Factors .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Statistical Analyses ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Results ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Effects of Food Distribution ........................................................................................................................ 10 Feeding ............................................................................................................................................................. 10 Foraging .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 Pacing ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 Out of Sight Nighthouse ........................................................................................................................... 11 Effects of External Factors .......................................................................................................................... 11 Temperature .................................................................................................................................................. 11 Discussion ................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Effects of Food Distribution ........................................................................................................................ 12 Feeding ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 Foraging .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Pacing ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 Out of Sight Nighthouse ........................................................................................................................... 16 Effects of External Factors .......................................................................................................................... 17 Temperature .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Visitor Presence ........................................................................................................................................... 18 Future Research ............................................................................................................................................... 19 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Literature Cited ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 Tables ......................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Table 1: Schedule of trials and description of each set ........................................................................ 25 Table 2. Ethogram describing behaviors used in analysis ................................................................... 25 Figures ....................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 1: Average bout duration of behaviors by distribution in AM. ........................................... 26 v Figure 2: Average duration of bouts per clump type. ........................................................................... 26 Figure 3: Average bout duration of behaviors by distribution in PM. ............................................ 27 Figure 4: The frequency of behaviors in the AM and PM observations. ....................................... 27 ` vi Introduction Because wild animals forage in order to maximize energy gain and minimize energy expenditure (Schoener 1971; Pyke et al. 1977; Rapaport 1998; Schneider et al. 2014), food distribution and abundance affect foraging behavior (Charnov 1976; Pyke et al. 1977). Distribution is defined by how far apart the individual food items are separated. In general, food is considered clumped if it occurs in large patches, while scattered food occurs in smaller patches that are more dispersed throughout the environment (Pyke et al. 1977; Isbell et al. 1998; Mathy and Isbell 2001). Researchers label food as clumped when the density in the patch is higher than the surrounding areas and scattered when food is more evenly dispersed and smaller in size (Wiens 1976; Isbell et al. 1998; Isbell 2000). Differences between these two types of food distribution can be measured by the way animals forage. According to marginal value theorem, animals feeding on clumped resources should stay at a clump as long as the capture rate exceeds that of the surrounding environment (Charnov 1976; Pyke et al. 1977). Thus animals should feed at large clumps longer because there is more food to eat as clump size increases (as long as group size does not change). Animals feeding on scattered resources spend less time at a food site (Charnov 1976; Pyke et al. 1977; Isbell et al. 1998). In addition to distribution, food abundance also influences how animals forage in the wild (Charnov 1976; Pyke et al. 1977; Isbell et al. 1998). Food is considered abundant if it is not limited and there is an excess of food available