ORGANIZING PROSPERITY Union Effects on Job Quality, Community Betterment, and Industry Standards
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Why a Union Voice Makes a Real Difference for Women Workers: Then and Now
Why a Union Voice Makes a Real Difference for Women Workers: Then and Now Judith A. Scottt ABSTRACT: Working women, labor unions, and collective action played a crucial role in passing and implementing the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. The Article describes how labor unions pushed for the passage of the Act and later made protections for pregnant workers real through collective bargaining, internal education efforts, and litigation. Finally, the Article discusses the fundamental improvements for working women that still must be achieved- and the need for strengthened worker organizations if those changes are to become a reality. IN TRO DU CTION ................................................................................................ 233 I. THE FIRST STEP: THE ROLE OF UNIONS IN PASSING THE PDA ................... 234 II. UNION ADVOCACY: MAKING THE PDA REAL FOR WORKERS ................... 235 III. BEYOND THE PDA: THE FUTURE ROLE OF UNIONS IN SECURING THE RIGHTS OF W OMEN W ORKERS ............................................................. 241 C ON CLU SION ................................................................................................... 244 INTRODUCTION In this Article, I describe an important story behind the passage and implementation of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA)I--one that has continuing implications for creating a society that delivers for poor and working families and rebuilds the middle class. It is the story of how the empowerment of working women and collective action were crucial to improving workplace culture and practices for pregnant workers thirty years ago, and why those same factors are necessary today if we are to dramatically t Judith A. Scott is currently General Counsel of the Service Employees International Union and a member of the law firm of James & Hoffman, P.C., Washington, D.C. -
How Immigration Enforcement Has Interfered with Workers' Rights
How Immigration Enforcement Has Interfered with Workers’ Rights ICED OUT: How Immigration Enforcement Has Interfered with Workers’ Rights ICED OUT | How Immigration Enforcement Has Interfered with Workers’ Rights by Rebecca Smith, National Employment Law Project; Ana Avendaño, AFL-CIO; Julie Martínez Ortega, American Rights at Work Education Fund Photo Credits: Photos featured in this report were generously supplied by the New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice. © October 2009. All Rights Reserved. Acknowledgements: Eddie Acosta, AFL-CIO; Erin Johansson, American Rights at Work Education Fund; Michael L. Snider, Attorney at Law; Jenny Yang, Cohen, Milstein, Sellers and Toll; Brooke Anderson, East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy; Brooke Greco, Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center; Brady Bratcher, Iron Workers Union Local 75; Hillary Ronen, La Raza Centro Legal; Renee Saucedo, La Raza Centro Legal; Jennifer Rosenbaum, New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice; Julie Samples, Oregon Law Center ; Jacqueline Ramirez, Service Employees International Union Local 87; Siovhan Sheridan-Ayala, Sheridan Ayala Law Office; Mary Bauer, Kristin Graunke, Monica Ramirez and Andrew Turner, Southern Poverty Law Center; Vanessa Spinazola, The Pro Bono Project; Gening Liao, formerly of United Food and Commercial Workers; Randy Rigsby, United Steelworkers District 9; Jim Knoepp, Virginia Justice Center. 2 ICED OUT: How Immigration Enforcement Has Interfered with Workers’ Rights TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ......................................................................... 5 II. Immigration and Labor Law in Context ................................................ 7 III. Federal Policies Fail to Ensure Appropriate Balance Between Immigration and Labor Law Enforcement ................................... 13 IV. Case Studies: Immigration Enforcement Trumps Labor Rights .........................15 V. The Need to Identify and Assist Workers Who Are Victims of Labor Trafficking Rather than Focusing on Their Deportation ................30 VI. -
515-UAW-Basics-071318.Pdf
CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 Founding ................................................................................................. 1 Headquarters ......................................................................................... 1 Our Constitution ..................................................................................... 2 Our Purpose ............................................................................................ 2 Constitutional Convention .................................................................. 3 Special Collective Bargaining Convention ...................................... 3 Who We Are ........................................................................................... 4 Where we work ...................................................................................... 5 Member Dues ........................................................................................ 5 Member Appeal Rights ........................................................................ 6 About Local Unions ............................................................................... 7 About the International Union ............................................................ 8 International Officers ............................................................................ 9 Regions and Regional Directors ......................................................... 9 International Trustees ......................................................................... -
LETTER LABOR ADVISORY BOARD SEPTEMBER 2015 Vol
Published By AMERICAN INCOME LIFE & NATIONAL INCOME LIFE LETTER LABOR ADVISORY BOARD SEPTEMBER 2015 Vol. 47 No. 5 NEWS FROM THE Dodd-Frank financial law. “At a time when 300 times in 2013, according to an analysis AFL-CIO, CTW, corporate profits are near an all-time high last year by the Economic Policy Institute. and income inequality is growing, employ- INTERNATIONAL & ees and shareholders have a right to know A coalition of unions recently NATIONAL UNIONS whether companies are padding the wal- negotiated the first-ever national tentative lets of executives at the cost of workers and settlement with the American Red Cross Five presidential candidates the company’s bottom line,” said Teamsters for 4,000 health care workers in 24 states. met with the nation’s top union leaders at Secretary-Treasurer Ken Hall. “It’s time Union members will have until October 2 the AFL-CIO Executive Council meet- we learn from the past failings that helped to approve the agreement. The coalition in- ing in Washington, D.C. in July. They are cause the Great Recession.” AFL-CIO Pres- cludes the Teamsters, American Federation Senators Bernie Sanders, Jim Webb, and ident Richard Trumka said the rule will al- of State, County and Municipal Employees, Hillary Clinton, and Governors Martin low shareholders to determine whether CEO American Federation of Teachers (HPAE O’Malley, all Democrats, and Republican pay is out of balance in comparison to what a and Oregon Nurses), Communications Mike Huckabee. “We are grateful to them company pays its workers. “We hope this rule Workers of America, United Auto Work- for making the time to talk with the elected will help investors make sound decisions ers, United Food & Commercial Workers, representatives of 12.5 million working men when they vote on executive compensation United Steelworkers and Service Employ- and women in America,” said AFL-CIO packages,” he said. -
Rushing Union Elections: Protecting the Interests of Big Labor at the Expense of Workers’ Free Choice
RUSHING UNION ELECTIONS: PROTECTING THE INTERESTS OF BIG LABOR AT THE EXPENSE OF WORKERS’ FREE CHOICE HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, JULY 7, 2011 Serial No. 112–31 Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and the Workforce ( Available via the World Wide Web: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/committee.action?chamber=house&committee=education or Committee address: http://edworkforce.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 67–240 PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE JOHN KLINE, Minnesota, Chairman Thomas E. Petri, Wisconsin George Miller, California, Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ McKeon, California Senior Democratic Member Judy Biggert, Illinois Dale E. Kildee, Michigan Todd Russell Platts, Pennsylvania Donald M. Payne, New Jersey Joe Wilson, South Carolina Robert E. Andrews, New Jersey Virginia Foxx, North Carolina Robert C. ‘‘Bobby’’ Scott, Virginia Bob Goodlatte, Virginia Lynn C. Woolsey, California Duncan Hunter, California Rube´n Hinojosa, Texas David P. Roe, Tennessee Carolyn McCarthy, New York Glenn Thompson, Pennsylvania John F. Tierney, Massachusetts Tim Walberg, Michigan Dennis J. Kucinich, Ohio Scott DesJarlais, Tennessee David Wu, Oregon Richard L. Hanna, New York Rush D. Holt, New Jersey Todd Rokita, Indiana Susan A. Davis, California Larry Bucshon, Indiana Rau´ l M. Grijalva, Arizona Trey Gowdy, South Carolina Timothy H. -
How Immigration Enforcement Has Interfered with Workers' Rights
How Immigration Enforcement Has Interfered with Workers’ Rights ICED OUT: How Immigration Enforcement Has Interfered with Workers’ Rights ICED OUT | How Immigration Enforcement Has Interfered with Workers’ Rights by Rebecca Smith, National Employment Law Project; Ana Avendaño, AFL-CIO; Julie Martínez Ortega, American Rights at Work Education Fund Photo Credits: Photos featured in this report were generously supplied by the New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice. © October 2009. All Rights Reserved. Acknowledgements: Eddie Acosta, AFL-CIO; Erin Johansson, American Rights at Work Education Fund; Michael L. Snider, Attorney at Law; Jenny Yang, Cohen, Milstein, Sellers and Toll; Brooke Anderson, East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy; Brooke Greco, Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center; Brady Bratcher, Iron Workers Union Local 75; Hillary Ronen, La Raza Centro Legal; Renee Saucedo, La Raza Centro Legal; Jennifer Rosenbaum, New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice; Julie Samples, Oregon Law Center ; Jacqueline Ramirez, Service Employees International Union Local 87; Siovhan Sheridan-Ayala, Sheridan Ayala Law Office; Mary Bauer, Kristin Graunke, Monica Ramirez and Andrew Turner, Southern Poverty Law Center; Vanessa Spinazola, The Pro Bono Project; Gening Liao, formerly of United Food and Commercial Workers; Randy Rigsby, United Steelworkers District 9; Jim Knoepp, Virginia Justice Center. 2 ICED OUT: How Immigration Enforcement Has Interfered with Workers’ Rights TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .. ........................ 5 II. Immigration and Labor Law in Context . 7 III. Federal Policies Fail to Ensure Appropriate Balance Between Immigration and Labor Law Enforcement . 13 IV. Case Studies: Immigration Enforcement Trumps Labor Rights . 15 V. The Need to Identify and Assist Workers Who Are Victims of Labor Trafficking Rather than Focusing on Their Deportation . -
Strategic Integration, Contract
STRATEGIC INTEGRATION, CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION, AND COMPREHENSIVE CONTRACT CAMPAIGN EFFECTIVENESS: A CASE STUDY OF THE CULINARY WORKERS UNION, HERE LOCAL 226’S 2002 COMPREHENSIVE CONTRACT CAMPAIGN A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Paul Everett Hayes January 2006 © 2006 Paul Everett Hayes ABSTRACT This thesis is a case study of the comprehensive contract campaign that the Culinary Union, HERE Local 226 utilized in its 2002 round of negotiations with casino operators in Las Vegas. The focus of this study is on how the comprehensive contract campaign strategy used by the Culinary Union increased the local’s bargaining power in the negotiations. This case study links the success of the 2002 comprehensive contract campaign to the local’s prior practices, long-term strategies, as well as its organizational structure and culture. This case study also examines how the political, social, and economic context of Las Vegas’s casino industry influenced the Culinary Union’s comprehensive contract campaign. It describes the interactive relationship between these external contextual factors, the local’s strategic choices, and industrial relations outcomes in Las Vegas’s casino industry. This case study describes how the Culinary Union, by using the organizing model of contract administration, created an organizational culture and structure that lead to increases in the quality and quantity of rank-and-file participation in the union, and how this benefited the union in its 2002 comprehensive contract campaign. In addition to citing specific examples from the 2002 contract campaign itself, this case study uses the industrial relations literature relating to union commitment and participation, in order to support this argument. -
G:\Docs\Seabright1\Nora\Hyatt V Unite Here Local 5 V2.Wpd
Case 1:11-cv-00645-JMS-KSC Document 25 Filed 02/29/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: <pageID> IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII HYATT CORPORATION, dba HYATT ) CIVIL NO. 11-00645 JMS/KSC REGENCY WAIKIKI BEACH ) RESORT AND SPA, ) ORDER (1) GRANTING ) RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO Petitioner, ) DISMISS PURSUANT TO ) FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL vs. ) PROCEDURE 12(B)(1), 12(B)(5), & ) 12(B)(6), DOC. NO. 5; UNITE HERE LOCAL 5, ) (2) DENYING AS MOOT ) PETITIONER’S MOTION TO Respondent. ) CONFIRM PORTIONS AND TO ) MODIFY, OR VACATE ) PORTIONS OF THE ) ARBITRATION AWARD DATED ) JULY 27, 2011, DOC. NO. 1; AND ) (3) DENYING RESPONDENT’S ) MOTION TO COMPEL ) ARBITRATION, DOC. NO. 16 ________________________________ ) ORDER (1) GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(1), 12(B)(5), & 12(B)(6), DOC. NO. 5; (2) DENYING AS MOOT PETITIONER’S MOTION TO CONFIRM PORTIONS AND TO MODIFY, OR VACATE PORTIONS OF THE ARBITRATION AWARD DATED JULY 27, 2011, DOC. NO. 1; AND (3) DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, DOC. NO. 16 I. INTRODUCTION This dispute stems from an arbitration proceeding between Hyatt Corporation, dba Hyatt Regency Waikiki Beach Resort and Spa (“Hyatt”) and Unite Here Local 5 (the “Union”) in which the Union asserted that Hyatt violated Case 1:11-cv-00645-JMS-KSC Document 25 Filed 02/29/12 Page 2 of 19 PageID #: <pageID> the parties’ Collective Bargaining Agreement (the “CBA” or the “Agreement”) by subcontracting work normally carried out by bargaining-unit employees. -
515-UAW-Basics-071318-1.Pdf
CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 Founding ............................................................................................. 1 Headquarters ..................................................................................... 1 Our Constitution ................................................................................. 2 Our Purpose ........................................................................................ 2 Constitutional Convention ............................................................... 3 Special Collective Bargaining Convention .................................... 3 Who We Are ....................................................................................... 4 Where We Work ................................................................................. 5 Member Dues .................................................................................... 5 How UAW Dues Are Used ................................................................. 8 UAW Dues Are Not Used for Campaign Contributions ................. 8 Member Appeal Rights ..................................................................... 8 About Local Unions ........................................................................... 9 About the International Union ....................................................... 10 International Officers ....................................................................... 10 Regions and Regional Directors -
This Table Was Generated on 12/18/20. Rank ID # Committee Amount $57,287,776 $16,358,600 $12,700,892 $11,559,716 $11,544,984
This table was generated on 12/18/20. PAC Table 6a Top 50 Labor PACs by Receipts January 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020 Rank ID # Committee Amount 1 C00004036 SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION) $57,287,776 2 C00011114 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E $16,358,600 3 C00032979 D.R.I.V.E. - DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN, INDEPENDENT VOTER EDUCATION (THE PAC OF THE INTERNATIO$13,508,039 4 C00028860 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION $12,700,892 5 C00021121 VOICE OF TEACHERS FOR EDUC/CMTE ON POL EDUC OF NY STATE UNTD TEACHERS (VOTE/COPE) OF $11,617,886 6 C00348540 1199 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INT'L UNION FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION FUND $11,559,716 7 C00002766 UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION ACTIVE BALLOT CLUB $11,544,984 8 C00162818 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 98 COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUC $10,500,392 9 C00002840 UAW - V - CAP (UAW VOLUNTARY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM) $10,194,256 10 C00029504 ENGINEERS POLITICAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE (EPEC)/INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINE $9,963,697 11 C00027342 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $9,613,050 12 C00012476 UA UNION PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS VOTE! PAC (UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPREN$8,073,190 13 C00007922 LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA (LIUNA) PAC $7,916,101 14 C00238725 NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION PAC $7,825,448 15 C00002089 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA-COPE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITTEE $7,797,318 16 C00023580 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS OF U.S.A. -
Local Officers' Resource Manual
Dear Colleagues: Congratulations on your election. You take office at one of the most critical moments in the history of our country and union. This moment calls for bold leadership as our union responds to three intersecting crises. We are living in an era of extreme economic inequality and Corporate Power. We have seen the largest redistribution of wealth in our nation’s history and the lowest unionized workforce in decades. In 2020 we also faced the threat, destruction, and tragedy of the COVID-19 pandemic. Amidst the devastation of COVID-19, we have found ourselves confronting the plague of racism in America, which has been rampaging in our communities since long before the pandemic. I have been proud of the actions our union has taken to dismantle anti-Black racism and we have so much more work to do. I know that together we are up to the task of confronting these challenges. We can continue building our union’s power through new organizing, bargaining strong contracts, and building independent political power behind a working class agenda. As unprecedented as the COVID-19 pandemic is, CWAers have been on the front lines every day, keeping people informed, connected, and safe during this difficult time. And if we are to make progress in tearing down racism in this country and in our union, we must listen to the experiences of Black CWA members and all Black workers. Every white union member, Black union member, Latino union member, and every ally must fight and organize for Black lives. Unions have a duty to fight for power, dignity and the right to live for every working-class person in every place. -
Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas V. NLRB, No. 10-72981
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LOCAL JOINT EXECUTIVE BOARD OF LAS VEGAS; CULINARY WORKERS UNION LOCAL #226; BARTENDERS No. 10-72981 UNION LOCAL 165, Petitioners, NLRB Nos. 28-CA-13274/75 v. OPINION NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board Argued and Submitted June 7, 2011—Portland, Oregon Filed September 13, 2011 Before: William C. Canby, Jr., Susan P. Graber, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Paez 17423 LOCAL JOINT EXECUTIVE BOARD v. NLRB 17427 COUNSEL Richard G. McCracken, Andrew J. Kahn, and Barry J. Jelli- son, Davis, Cowell & Bowe LLP, San Francisco, California, for petitioners Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas, Culinary Workers Union Local 226 and Bartenders Union Local 165. Usha Dheenan and Greg P. Lauro, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent National Labor Relations Board. OPINION PAEZ, Circuit Judge: We review a petition by the Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas, Culinary Workers Union Local 226 and Bartend- ers Union Local 165 (the “Union”) from an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) dismissing a complaint alleging unfair labor practices by Hacienda Resort Hotel and Casino and Sahara Hotel and Casino (the “Employers”). This dispute between the Union and the Employers is now more than 15 years old, and this is the third petition brought by the Union challenging a ruling by the Board. The Union alleges that the Employers violated sec- 17428 LOCAL JOINT EXECUTIVE BOARD v.