DOCSLIB.ORG

US Forest Service/GSTA Pays Dogon Project Technical Assistance to Bandiagara Cercle, Mali

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

US Forest Service/GSTA Pays Dogon Project Technical Assistance to Bandiagara Cercle, Mali Mission: April 25-May 9, 2008 Participants in Guides’ Training Prepared by: Lisa Machnik, Ph.D., Project Coordinator Intermountain Region (R4) Regional Office, US Forest Service [email protected] TEL: (801) 625-5205 Sara Campney, Social Science Analyst Cibola National Forest and Grasslands, US Forest Service [email protected] TEL: (505) 346-3886 July 10, 2008 Sustainable Tourism in Dogon Country July 10, 2008 Table of Contents I. List of Acronyms............................................................................................................. 3 II. Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 4 III. Executive Summary...................................................................................................... 5 IV. Introduction: Scope of Technical Assistance ............................................................... 6 V. Issues and Findings ........................................................................................................ 9 ISSUE A: Representation of Stakeholders in the Visitor Center.................................... 9 ISSUE B: Traditional Materials and Design................................................................. 10 B1. Construction and Materials ................................................................................ 10 B2. Use of Traditional Dogon Design ...................................................................... 11 B3. Functional Elements........................................................................................... 11 ISSUE C: Funding ........................................................................................................ 12 ISSUE D: Guides’ General and Specialized Resource Knowledge.............................. 13 ISSUE E. Incorporating Local Products ....................................................................... 14 ISSUE F: Environmental Impacts of Tourism.............................................................. 14 F1. Human Waste and Sanitation.............................................................................. 15 F2: Litter ................................................................................................................... 16 ISSUE G: Basic First Aid ............................................................................................. 17 ISSUE H: Guides’ Organization................................................................................... 18 ISSUE I: Historic Site Protection ................................................................................. 19 ISSUE G: Web/Internet Training.................................................................................. 20 ISSUE H: Other Training Interests............................................................................... 21 VI. Summary of Recommendations.............................................................................. 22 VI: Conclusions .............................................................................................................. xxv Appendices APPENDIX I: Scope of Work .........................................................................................i APPENDIX II: Itinerary ..................................................................................................vi APPENDIX III: Participants (Visitor Center Training)...................................................vii APPENDIX IV: Participants (Guides’ Training) ............................................................viii APPENDIX V: Proposed Visitor Center Budget.............................................................ix APPENDIX VI: Visitors Survey .....................................................................................x APPENDIX VII: Resources.............................................................................................xxiv Sustainable Tourism in Dogon Country 2 July 10, 2008 I. List of Acronyms GSTA – Global Sustainable Tourism Alliance OMATHO - Office Malien du Tourisme et de l'Hôtellerie AED – Academy for Educational Development USAID – United States Agency for International Development GAAS Mali - Groupe Pour l’Alimentation d’Action au Sahel-Mali (Local NGO which addresses AIDS/HIV, Child trafficking, female castration, and other human rights issues) CCB - Cercle Conseil de Bandiagara USFS – United States Forest Service MCB – Mission Culturelle de Bandiagara Sustainable Tourism in Dogon Country 3 July 10, 2008 II. Acknowledgements The USFS International Programs mission team extends sincere thanks to our Malian hosts and counterparts. We were received with unparalleled hospitality, and appreciated the camaraderie and professionalism of our partners at USAID, AED, and the GSTA. To all with whom we collaborated, thank you. The success of this mission would not have been possible without your dedication, hard work, and investment of time and energy. It was an honor to work with you. We thank the US Embassy in Bamako for their support of this mission and their work towards realizing sustainable tourism in Pays Dogon. We extend a special thanks to Cristina Nardone, Coordinator of GSTA. Her dedication to this project ensured that all aspects of our work in Bandiagara proceeded smoothly. Significant planning, preparation, and logistics were necessary in coordinating the many partners and participants involved in these training sessions. We thank Mr. Moctar BA, Director of OMATHO in Mopti for his direction and support in advancing the goals of this mission. We are grateful to Mr. Diarra Prefect of Bandiagara, Mr. Guindo, president of the CCB (district council of Bandiagara) and Mr.Tembely Mayor of Bandiagara for their support in promoting sustainable tourism in the Bandiagara cercle. We extend a special thanks to the Ministry of Tourism. We extend our thanks to all of the training participants for taking part these workshops and for actively engaging in what we hope will continue to be a collaborative approach to sustainable tourism. We would also like to thank the Misson Culturelle de Bandiagara and GAAS-Mali for coming as guest lecturers. Your time and energy in contributing locally relevant material to the class was greatly appreciated by the instructors and participants. Special thanks are due to the team of facilitators who assisted throughout the training. From the GSTA project, we thank Allaye Karembe, Barri Diakite, and Bobacaray Ouologuem. From the Peace Corps, we thank Ben Arnold and Dan DiFranco for their work in taking notes and facilitating during the class. We greatly appreciated the opportunity to serve on this unique and challenging mission, and extend our thanks for support to our USFS home offices in New Mexico and Utah, and to USFS International Programs in Washington, DC. Sustainable Tourism in Dogon Country 4 July 10, 2008 III. Executive Summary The overall objective of USFS technical assistance in the Pays Dogon GSTA is to build capacity in natural resource conservation, sustainable productivity, and improved rural livelihoods in Pays Dogon. Bandiagara is a gateway town to key tourist sites in the Dogon escarpment. The regional Malian tourism office (OMATHO) plans to open a visitor center in Bandiagara in the next 6 to 9 months. A team of two USFS experts worked in-country with counterparts from USAID and AED from April 26 – May 9, 2008. The mission goals were to reinforce the local private sector by providing training in visitor center development and management, visitor education, and customer service in the Bandiagara cercle. The first training session (2 days) focused on developing relationships and collaboration among stakeholders with an interest in the creation of a visitor center in Bandiagara. The goal of this 2-day training was to identify ways in which the participating stakeholders (including OMATHO, the Mayor’s office, guides, hotels, and other local service providers) could collaborate in the development of and contribute to ongoing management of the proposed visitor center. The second training session for local guides (3.5 days) focused primarily on four topics: resource protection, professionalism and customer service, health and safety, and natural and cultural resource interpretation. The purpose of this session was to support the private tourism sector by providing formal training on a variety of immediately important topics, as well as topics that would assist in organization and long term business growth and development. Within these four main topics, a number of key principles for an effective and sustainable tourism sector were presented and discussed. The following issues were identified by the USFS team as critical to the advancement of sustainable tourism in Dogon Country: • Representation of stakeholders in the Visitor Center • Traditional materials and design • Funding • Guides’ general and specialized resource knowledge • Incorporating local products • Environmental impacts of tourism • Basic first aid • Guides’ organization • Historic site preservation • Web/Internet training • Other training interests These issues, along with findings and recommendations, are discussed in the following sections. Sustainable Tourism in Dogon Country 5 July 10, 2008 IV. Introduction: Scope of Technical Assistance Dogon Country is Mali’s number one tourist destination. Classified in 1989 as a UNESCO World Heritage site, this 4,000 km 2 area in Bandiagara Cercle
Recommended publications
  • Social Inclusion: a Pre-Requisite for Equitable and Sustainable Natural Resource Management

    Social Inclusion: a Pre-Requisite for Equitable and Sustainable Natural Resource Management

    Securing the commons No.7 Social inclusion: a pre-requisite for equitable and sustainable natural resource management Two experiences in Mali Aly Bocoum Katherine Cochrane Mamadou Diakite Oumar Kane April 2003 About the authors Aly Boucoum is the co-ordinator of the Natural Resource Management and Development Project (PAGRN) run by the Near East Foundation, an NGO based in Douentza that has been operating in the 5th administrative region of Mali since 1984. He can be contacted at the following address: NEF, BP 09, Cercle de Douentza, Région de Mopti, Mali; Tel: (223) 245 20 23, E-mail: [email protected] Katherine Cochrane worked as a UNAIS Development Worker on the Environmental Management Support Project run by SOS Sahel in Bankass, in the region of Mopti. She is currently Programme Officer at SOS Sahel UK. Her e-mail address is [email protected] Mamadou Diakité is the Director of SOS Sahel’s Environmental Management Support Project in the region of Mopti. He can be contacted at PAGE-B SOS Sahel, BP 31, Sévaré, Région de Mopti, Mali. Tel: (223) 242 04 53; E-mail: [email protected] Oumar Kane is the head of the Boré branch of NEF (the principal town in the municipality of Dangol Boré) in the region of Mopti. His contact details are NEF, BP 09, Cercle de Douentza, Région de Mopti, Mali; Tel (223) 245 20 23; E-mail [email protected] Acknowledgements This paper is based on the results of the action-research carried out by NEF and SOS Sahel in the context of the Shared Management of Common Property Resources programme, which was funded by Comic Relief, NORAD and DFID, and implemented by IIED and SOS Sahel UK.
  • Mali Livestock for Growth (L4g) Monthly Report No

    Mali Livestock for Growth (L4g) Monthly Report No

    MALI LIVESTOCK FOR GROWTH (L4G) MONTHLY REPORT NO. 45 MALI LIVESTOCK FOR GROWTH (L4G) MONTHLY REPORT NO. 45 Date: July 2018 Contract Number: AID-688-C-14-00004 Submitted to: USAID | Mali Prepared by: AECOM International Development DISCLAIMER: The authors’ views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Monthly Report No. 45 | Mali Livestock for Growth (L4G) i TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Component IR1: Increased Animal Productivity ....................................................................... 1 Sub-IR 1.1. Enhanced Technology Development, Dissemination, Management and Innovation ............. 1 Sub-IR 1.2 Increase Access to Quality Inputs and Services .............................................................................. 4 Sub-IR 1.3 Improved and Sustainable Management of Pastureland and Water ResourcesError! Bookmark not defined. Sub-IR 1.4 Improved Community Literacy, Numeracy and Nutrition Practices ......................................... 4 Composante II: Increased Domestic and Export Trade ........................................................... 8 Sub-IR 2.1Strengthened Market Linkages and Access ......................................................................................
  • FALAISES DE BANDIAGARA (Pays Dogon)»

    FALAISES DE BANDIAGARA (Pays Dogon)»

    MINISTERE DE LA CULTURE REPUBLIQUE DU MALI *********** Un Peuple - Un But - Une Foi DIRECTION NATIONALE DU ********** PATRIMOINE CULTUREL ********** RAPPORT SUR L’ETAT DE CONSERVATION DU SITE «FALAISES DE BANDIAGARA (Pays Dogon)» Janvier 2020 RAPPORT SUR L’ETAT ACTUEL DE CONSERVATION FALAISES DE BANDIAGARA (PAYS DOGON) (MALI) (C/N 516) Introduction Le site « Falaises de Bandiagara » (Pays dogon) est inscrit sur la Liste du Patrimoine Mondial de l’UNESCO en 1989 pour ses paysages exceptionnels intégrant de belles architectures, et ses nombreuses pratiques et traditions culturelles encore vivaces. Ce Bien Mixte du Pays dogon a été inscrit au double titre des critères V et VII relatif à l’inscription des biens: V pour la valeur culturelle et VII pour la valeur naturelle. La gestion du site est assurée par une structure déconcentrée de proximité créée en 1993, relevant de la Direction Nationale du Patrimoine Culturel (DNPC) du Département de la Culture. 1. Résumé analytique du rapport Le site « Falaises de Bandiagara » (Pays dogon) est soumis à une rude épreuve occasionnée par la crise sociopolitique et sécuritaire du Mali enclenchée depuis 2012. Cette crise a pris une ampleur particulière dans la Région de Mopti et sur ledit site marqué par des tensions et des conflits armés intercommunautaires entre les Dogons et les Peuls. Un des faits marquants de la crise au Pays dogon est l’attaque du village d’Ogossagou le 23 mars 2019, un village situé à environ 15 km de Bankass, qui a causé la mort de plus de 150 personnes et endommagé, voire détruit des biens mobiliers et immobiliers.
  • Inventaire Des Aménagements Hydro-Agricoles Existants Et Du Potentiel Amenageable Au Pays Dogon

    Inventaire Des Aménagements Hydro-Agricoles Existants Et Du Potentiel Amenageable Au Pays Dogon

    INVENTAIRE DES AMÉNAGEMENTS HYDRO-AGRICOLES EXISTANTS ET DU POTENTIEL AMENAGEABLE AU PAYS DOGON Rapport de mission et capitalisation d’expérienCe Financement : Projet d’Appui de l’Irrigation de Proximité (PAIP) Réalisation : cellule SIG DNGR/PASSIP avec la DRGR et les SLGR de la région de Mopti Bamako, avril 2015 Table des matières I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Méthodologie appliquée ................................................................................................................ 3 III. Inventaire des AHA existants et du potentiel aménageable dans le cercle de Bandiagara .......... 4 1. Déroulement des activités dans le cercle de Bandiagara ................................................................................... 7 2. Bilan de l’inventaire du cercle de Bandiagara .................................................................................................... 9 IV. Inventaire des AHA existants et du potentiel aménageable dans les cercles de Bankass et Koro 9 1. Déroulement des activités dans les deux cercles ............................................................................................... 9 2. Bilan de l’inventaire pour le cercle de Koro et Bankass ................................................................................... 11 Gelöscht: 10 V. Inventaire des AHA existants et du potentiel aménageable dans le cercle de Douentza ............. 12 VI. Récapitulatif de l’inventaire
  • M700kv1905mlia1l-Mliadm22305

    M700kv1905mlia1l-Mliadm22305

    ! ! ! ! ! RÉGION DE MOPTI - MALI ! Map No: MLIADM22305 ! ! 5°0'W 4°0'W ! ! 3°0'W 2°0'W 1°0'W Kondi ! 7 Kirchamba L a c F a t i Diré ! ! Tienkour M O P T I ! Lac Oro Haib Tonka ! ! Tombouctou Tindirma ! ! Saréyamou ! ! Daka T O M B O U C T O U Adiora Sonima L ! M A U R I T A N I E ! a Salakoira Kidal c Banikane N N ' T ' 0 a Kidal 0 ° g P ° 6 6 a 1 1 d j i ! Tombouctou 7 P Mony Gao Gao Niafunké ! P ! ! Gologo ! Boli ! Soumpi Koulikouro ! Bambara-Maoude Kayes ! Saraferé P Gossi ! ! ! ! Kayes Diou Ségou ! Koumaïra Bouramagan Kel Zangoye P d a Koulikoro Segou Ta n P c ! Dianka-Daga a ! Rouna ^ ! L ! Dianké Douguel ! Bamako ! ougoundo Leré ! Lac A ! Biro Sikasso Kormou ! Goue ! Sikasso P ! N'Gorkou N'Gouma ! ! ! Horewendou Bia !Sah ! Inadiatafane Koundjoum Simassi ! ! Zoumoultane-N'Gouma ! ! Baraou Kel Tadack M'Bentie ! Kora ! Tiel-Baro ! N'Daba ! ! Ambiri-Habe Bouta ! ! Djo!ndo ! Aoure Faou D O U E N T Z A ! ! ! ! Hanguirde ! Gathi-Loumo ! Oualo Kersani ! Tambeni ! Deri Yogoro ! Handane ! Modioko Dari ! Herao ! Korientzé ! Kanfa Beria G A O Fraction Sormon Youwarou ! Ourou! hama ! ! ! ! ! Guidio-Saré Tiecourare ! Tondibango Kadigui ! Bore-Maures ! Tanal ! Diona Boumbanke Y O U W A R O U ! ! ! ! Kiri Bilanto ! ! Nampala ! Banguita ! bo Sendegué Degue -Dé Hombori Seydou Daka ! o Gamni! d ! la Fraction Sanango a Kikara Na! ki ! ! Ga!na W ! ! Kelma c Go!ui a Te!ye Kadi!oure L ! Kerengo Diambara-Mouda ! Gorol-N! okara Bangou ! ! ! Dogo Gnimignama Sare Kouye ! Gafiti ! ! ! Boré Bossosso ! Ouro-Mamou ! Koby Tioguel ! Kobou Kamarama Da!llah Pringa!
  • Photos & Text : Huib Blom Sketches : Arian & Anneke Blom

    Photos & Text : Huib Blom Sketches : Arian & Anneke Blom

    www.dogon-lobi.ch photos & text : Huib Blom sketches : Arian & Anneke Blom Table of contents Introduction 01 Toloy 02 Tellem 02 Nongo 03 Dogon Country 05 Niongono (Pignari) 06 Kargue (Lowel-Gueou) 07 Dani Sare & Bounou (Lowel-Gueou) 08 Bara (Lowel-Gueou) 09 Borko (Bondum) 10 Tintam & Samari (Bondum) 11 Saoura Koum (plateau central) 12 Sangha 13 Pegue Toulou 14 Yougo Dogorou 15 The plain of Seno-Gondo 18 Architecture and traditional religion 20 Ginna (associated with the Wagem cult) 20 House of the Hogon (associated with the Lebe cult) 24 House of the Hogon of Arou 25 Binu shrine 26 Togu Na 29 Menstrual hut 31 Smithy 32 Altars 34 Mosque 35 The society of the masks 40 Funerary rites 40 Burial 40 Funeral 41 Funeral of the Hogon in Sangha - 1985 44 Masks 46 Mask Satimbe 47 Great Mask 48 Mask Sirige 50 Mask Kanaga 51 Various masks 52 Bibliography 57 www.dogon-lobi.ch is a travel journal. Photos presented were taken during some twenty trips spread over as many years. All these journeys were made on foot in the company of my friends Ana and Serou Dolo, sons of Diangouno Dolo, the late chief of Sangha. Today Ana is the owner of Hôtel Campement Gir-Yam in Sangha and Serou specializes in the building of wells and other water retention structures. Apart from some personal observations, the text that follows is based on the numerous ethnographic studies that have been conducted in Dogon country. It is an attempt to put a selection of photos in its cultural and historical context.
  • Women in Savings Groups to Invest in Labor-Saving Equipment

    Women in Savings Groups to Invest in Labor-Saving Equipment

    CARE Mali | Harande Labor-saving Equipment helps women improve incomes Date: Dec 2020 Copyright: © CARE Mali Credit © Daffa SISSOKO / October 2020 Photo INTERVENTION CONTEXT AND PROBLEM In Mali, women make up 52% of the rural equipment and only 2.9% of women have access population and 64.2% live below the poverty to credit for agriculture compared to 6.6% of line. They account for 75% of the agricultural men according to the Agricultural workforce. Women face many barriers to Census/National Gender Policy/2011. Only 14% earning higher incomes such as their difficult of Malian women own farmland compared to access to productive resources and credits. Less 86% of men, and gap is even greater in the Mopti than 20% of women have agricultural Region (6% of women compared to 94% of men). Credit © Daffa SISSOKO / 2019 Photo Credit Rating: Tcrop ransport residues For various uses in the household: heating, cooking, feeding ruminants, etc. The village Kagnantaga, located about 20 km 3.5km to men’s fields. The group makes between from Bandiagara, lacks water infrastructure and 300FCFA and 500FCFA ($0.55-$0.92) on each trip health facilities. In this village there is only one to split between 21 women. They make this trip VSLA group of illiterate women. These very on foot with the baskets on their heads and vulnerable women make the most of their children on their backs. In addition, they are income from farming small portions of land—no responsible for collecting firewood, collecting more than 5m2 per woman. After the market water, and feeding the family.
  • Régions De SEGOU Et MOPTI République Du Mali P! !

    Régions De SEGOU Et MOPTI République Du Mali P! !

    Régions de SEGOU et MOPTI République du Mali P! ! Tin Aicha Minkiri Essakane TOMBOUCTOUC! Madiakoye o Carte de la ville de Ségou M'Bouna Bintagoungou Bourem-Inaly Adarmalane Toya ! Aglal Razelma Kel Tachaharte Hangabera Douekiré ! Hel Check Hamed Garbakoira Gargando Dangha Kanèye Kel Mahla P! Doukouria Tinguéréguif Gari Goundam Arham Kondi Kirchamba o Bourem Sidi Amar ! Lerneb ! Tienkour Chichane Ouest ! ! DiréP Berabiché Haib ! ! Peulguelgobe Daka Ali Tonka Tindirma Saréyamou Adiora Daka Salakoira Sonima Banikane ! ! Daka Fifo Tondidarou Ouro ! ! Foulanes NiafounkoéP! Tingoura ! Soumpi Bambara-Maoude Kel Hassia Saraferé Gossi ! Koumaïra ! Kanioumé Dianké ! Leré Ikawalatenes Kormou © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA N'Gorkou N'Gouma Inadiatafane Sah ! ! Iforgas Mohamed MAURITANIE Diabata Ambiri-Habe ! Akotaf Oska Gathi-Loumo ! ! Agawelene ! ! ! ! Nourani Oullad Mellouk Guirel Boua Moussoulé ! Mame-Yadass ! Korientzé Samanko ! Fraction Lalladji P! Guidio-Saré Youwarou ! Diona ! N'Daki Tanal Gueneibé Nampala Hombori ! ! Sendegué Zoumané Banguita Kikara o ! ! Diaweli Dogo Kérengo ! P! ! Sabary Boré Nokara ! Deberé Dallah Boulel Boni Kérena Dialloubé Pétaka ! ! Rekerkaye DouentzaP! o Boumboum ! Borko Semmi Konna Togueré-Coumbé ! Dogani-Beré Dagabory ! Dianwely-Maoundé ! ! Boudjiguiré Tongo-Tongo ! Djoundjileré ! Akor ! Dioura Diamabacourou Dionki Boundou-Herou Mabrouck Kebé ! Kargue Dogofryba K12 Sokora Deh Sokolo Damada Berdosso Sampara Kendé ! Diabaly Kendié Mondoro-Habe Kobou Sougui Manaco Deguéré Guiré ! ! Kadial ! Diondori
  • Accord De Paix Entre Communautés Dogon & Peulh Des Communes De

    Accord De Paix Entre Communautés Dogon & Peulh Des Communes De

    Accord de paix entre communautés dogon & peulh des communes de Bondo, Dioungani et Koro Cercle de Koro, Mali Janvier 2021 Préambule Nous, communautés dogon et peulh des communes de Bondo, Dioungani et Koro dans le cercle de Koro au Mali, ci-après dénommées les Parties ; Conscientes que le conflit qui nous oppose depuis 2017 alimente la crise sécuritaire qui secoue la région ; Tenant compte des résultats des précédents efforts de réconciliation menés par nos communautés, l’Etat, les collectivités, les associations et des différentes démarches du Haut Conseil Islamique de Koro. Et tenant également compte de l’accord de paix entre les communautés dogon et peulh de Koro signé en août 2018 à la suite du cessez le feu unilatéral de Dana Ambassagou facilité par le Centre pour le dialogue humanitaire et de l’engagement réciproque de la communauté peulh. Soucieuses de renforcer les premiers engagements exprimés durant les rencontres préparatoires intercommunautaires facilités par Monobèm de Madougou le 23 février 2020, Binédama le 16 avril 2020, Anagadia le 24 juin 2020, Karakindé le 22 mai 2020 et de Laiwaikandé du 28 juillet 2020 dans la commune de Madougou qui avait impliqué 107 villages des communes de Sangha et Dourou dans le processus, et des rencontres intercommunautaires facilitées depuis septembre 2020 à Dangatène, Madougou, Toroli et Pel ; Rappelant que jadis les communautés dogon et peulhs cohabitaient pacifiquement dans le cercle de Koro, communes de Bondo, Dioungani et Koro malgré les tensions qui ont toujours existé entre nos communautés
  • Mali Enhanced Market Analysis 2019

    Mali Enhanced Market Analysis 2019

    FEWS NET Mali Enhanced Market Analysis 2019 MALI ENHANCED MARKET ANALYSIS JUNE 2019 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. for the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET), contract number AID-OAA-I-12-00006. The authors’Famine views Early expressed Warning inSystem this publications Network do not necessarily reflect the views of the 1 United States Agency for International Development or the United States government. FEWS NET Mali Enhanced Market Analysis 2019 About FEWS NET Created in response to the 1984 famines in East and West Africa, the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) provides early warning and integrated, forward-looking analysis of the many factors that contribute to food insecurity. FEWS NET aims to inform decision makers and contribute to their emergency response planning; support partners in conducting early warning analysis and forecasting; and provide technical assistance to partner-led initiatives. To learn more about the FEWS NET project, please visit www.fews.net. Disclaimer This publication was prepared under the United States Agency for International Development Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Indefinite Quantity Contract, AID-OAA-I-12-00006. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States government. Acknowledgments FEWS NET gratefully acknowledges the network of partners in Mali who contributed their time, analysis, and data to make this report possible. Recommended Citation FEWS NET. 2019. Mali Enhanced Market Analysis. Washington, DC: FEWS NET.
  • Cliff of Bandiagara

    Cliff of Bandiagara

    I---. _ L/ v WORLDBEBITAGE NOMINATION--IUCN SUMMARY c ' LE SANCTUAIRENATUREL ST CULTURELDE LA FALAISE DE BANDI' 0w.J) mi. r ---- l&L- -_ _ _ ._ Summary prepared by IUCN (March 1989) based on the original nomination submitted by the Government of Mali. This original and all documents presented in support of this nomination will be available for consultation at the meetings of the Bureau and the Committee. 1. LOCATION: The village of Sangha (Sanga or Songo), on the crest of the Bandiagara plateau escarpment, is located at the centre of the sanctuary. It overlooks the village of Banani at the Bandiagara cliff base, 44km north-east of Bandiagara town and 107km east of Mopti, in the Mopti fifth administrative and economic region. 14°00'-14045'N, 3°00*-3050'W. The sanctuary totals 400,OOOha. 2. JURIDICAL: The area was constituted as a natural and cultural sanctuary, initially based on Ordinance No. 52 of 3 October 1969 regulating the export of objects of art and subsequently by Law No. 85-4O/AN-RM of 26 July 1985 and Decree No. 203/PG-EM of 13 August 1985 safeguarding the cultural heritage, whilst Decree No. 299/PG-l?M of 19 September 1966 relates to the excavation-of sites. The Law No. 68-a/AN-EN of February 1968 sets out the Forestry Code and Ordinance No. 60/U&N of 11 November 1969 sets out the Hunting Code. 3. The sanctuary lies at the southern limit of the-Sahara in an arid aahelian region with averages of 58Ommof rainfall per year.
  • The Oral History of Dogon Villages and Migrations' to Dogon Plateau

    The Oral History of Dogon Villages and Migrations' to Dogon Plateau

    2018 ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА Т. 10. Вып. 3 ВОСТОКОВЕДЕНИЕ И АФРИКАНИСТИКА ИСТОРИЯ И ИСТОЧНИКОВЕДЕНИЕ UDC 801.83 The oral history of Dogon villages and migrations’ to Dogon Plateau P. A. Kutsenkov The Institute of Oriental Studies of RAS, 12, ul. Rozhdestvenka, 107031, Moscow, Russian Federation For citation: Kutsenkov P. A. The oral history of Dogon villages and migrations’ to Dogon Plateau. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 2018, vol. 10, issue 3, pp. 330–339. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2018.304 Despite the increased attention to the Dogon by anthropologists and ethnologists, there are many “white spots” in the history and ethnography of this people. For example, not so long ago it was believed that they speak six languages; then their number grew steadily, and now linguists number already thirty Dogon languages, conditionally united in the family of Dogon languages of the macro-family of Niger-Congo; it is possible that there are even more of them. The history of migrations on the Bandiagara Highlands and the adjoining plains also remains poorly understood. All existing hypotheses, one way or another, based on oral traditions (of- ten without specifying the informant and/or source). Only to a small extent are they based on archaeological data. In addition to the “common Dogon” historical tradition, which states that this people came to the Plateau around the turn of the 16th century, there are historical legends of individual villages, their neighbourhoods and even families. They can be very different from the ‘general’ version. From this point of view, two oral histories of the village of Endé are of great interest.