J Nations Unies ~ Interoffice Memorandum Memorandum Interieur

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

J Nations Unies ~ Interoffice Memorandum Memorandum Interieur t.SS ON - SERIES BOX FILE ACC. ,... .. , .' I .. ,1rnuT!~G SLI p FICHE DE TRANSMISSION TO: A: FROM: DE: ....., a Room No. - No de bureau Extension - Poste IDote _ ~ ., cct I'} f 1 FOR ACTION POUR SU ITE A DONNER FOR APPROVAL POUR APPROBATION ~ FOR SIGNATURE POUR SIGNATURE - FOR COMMENTS POUR OBSERVATIONS' MAY WE DISCUSS? POURRIONS-NOUS EN PARLER? YOUR ATTENTION VOTRE ATTENTION AS DISCUS.SEO COMME CONVENU :QUESTED SUITE A VOTRE DEMANDE -- ,w • ..: AND RETURN NOTER ET RETOURNER FOR INFORMATION V POUR INFORMATION - CR.13 (8-75) UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM INTERIEUR Mr. A.Z. Nsilo Swai 28 September 1977 TO: DATE: _________ A: Officer-in-Charge Department of Political Affairs, Trusteeship REFERENCE: _______ and Decolonization THROUG H : 5 / C DE: Blaine Sloan, Director /;- J2~ 1t11/(1} <ilVI ,J FROM: _ DE: GeneraJ. Legal Division U-'~· Office of Legal Affairs SUBJECT: OBJET: The United Nations Institute for Namibia This is in reply to your memorandum of 2 September 1977. As you are aware, the United Nations Institute for Namibia was created by the United Nations Council for Namibia, and the Council for Namibia is the trustee of the United Nations Fund for Namibia which finances the Institute. As the body which created the Institute and as the trustee of the Fund for Namibia which finances the Institute, the Council for Namibia has the necessary authority to arrange for the internal and external audit of the accounts of the Institute. As to the questions raised in the second paragraph of your letter, it is my understanding that the Agreement of 3 December 1975 between the Institute for Namibia and the Government of Zambia was negotiated by Mr. Sean MacBride when he was Commissioner for Namibia. There has, so far as I am aware, been no amendment of the Agreement. The Institute being a UN body has no status separate from the United Nations. Hence the Agreement of 3 December 1975 ought not to be considered as an Agreement between a non-UN body and the Government of Zambia. .. ... Mr. Blaire Sloan, Director 2 September 1977 General Legal Division Office of Legal Affairs A.Z. Nsilo Swai Officer-in-Charge Department of Political Affairs, Trusteeship and Decolonization The United Nations Institute for Namibia Your counsel would be very much appreciated on the following two matters: 1. Does the United Nations Council for Namibia possess the power to have the accounts of the Institute audited by the internal and external auditors of the United Nations? (The Internal Audit Service has informed the Secretary of the Council that auditors will be in Lusaka in September and they are ready to audit the Institut if so instructed.) 2. The agreement signed in Lusaka on 3 December 1975 between the Institute and the Government of Zambia, was it negotiated by the United Nations, or was it merely a private agreement between a non­ United Nations body and the Zambian Government? What is the status of the Institute under Zambian laws? Has there been a new agreement or revision? UNITED NATIONS - NATIONS UNIES United Nations Institute for Namibia Institut des Nations Unies pour la Namibie P.O. Box 30n Telephone 74300/07/08 Lusaka, Zambia Cable: Unations, Lusaka Ref: ' . 23 September 1977 / '"'·-~'•..,.. 1/ IL/ /i (,) u rlt ,J l'!.a ,,,<) ' rI A 'l'1 ~-, ~..._ v.11- ., "/~•~ .•. , '-,,._ I .J,() • Q "..( ., "(t.r. '-., , ''o-t. '· "'J> ·:0 t . ''- tad (........__ lrc . • r.J '7;,-;_ Your Excellency, • \,•Yj:f~ J-tc1 ·'··(} With reference to my letter of 14 July 1 , the honour to inform you, as a member of the Pre · inary Selection Committee, that the said Committee will hold its meeting on Tuesday morning 1 November 1977, at 9.00 hrs, on the Institute's premises, to interview and draw up a short list of the most suitable candidatep, and to make recommendations to the Senate for the appointment of an Assistant Director for the Economics Division. Please Accept, Your Excellency, the assurances of my highest esteem and Consideration. Her Excellency, Ambassador Gwendolyn Konie President UN Council for Namibia Room 3310 United Nations New York, N.Y. lp017 ;,: / i UNITED NATIONS. NATIONS UNIES United Nations Institute for Namibia Institut des Nations Unics pour la Namibie P.O. Box 30n Telephone 74300/07 /08 Lusaka, Zambia Cabl~: Unations, Lusaka ~ ll(II (✓)t1#I ) 19 September 1977 With reference to our letter of 14 July 1977, regarding the Sixth Meeting of the Senate, I wish to inform you that this meeting will now take place on 1 and 2 November 1977, with provisional arrangements to be made for an extra day, should discussions warrant it. Enclosed please find a copy of the Draft Agenda for your information. Please Accept, Your Excellency, the assurances of my highest esteem an4: consideration. Hage <. Geingob Director Her Excellency . Ambassador Gwen Konie r resiC::.E:11i:. UN Council for Namibia Room 3310 United Nations New York, N.Y. 10017 6/SEN/LU/47 1 2 ~o vcmbcr 1077 L I L 1\ n prov ;ll o f t he r- ' i 1~ u t c s 1:, f the F i ft h me e t in g h(~ld on lt~ _,,,16 ;,,ar,:h l :"'77 I I I. · l1,i·tters ::,.risinp.: from t he hinutcs of the mee t in.[' he:J c1. on. 14 - 1 fr March 197'1 IV , ;, r c 1 i.r.: i no ry ~; r, .1 1,,c t i o}·, Cor,1mi tu~ c Report (~nno i nt~cnt of ~ssistnnt Dircctni - Economics ') -L· ·\·r-; r,.; J. -L ... _;~ n,,)•. 1 • VI,, I Rep .rt o/ .D:i_rectoT ~rn ~~ t afF ?tn:iointment.s Rena r t on stnff benefit: Pranrumme R~~s~t an~ 1978 revised VII. Report on stuJcnt s pcr forPanc c Rer,ort 0r, ~,r::crmc intab:; of students Re 0 -·, rt :)L stu,Jcnt accommod a tion VIIL I Proprcss Report nn Research Activiti~s ] IX, P.epr•rt on goc11 :1chir~vcmcnts of the Institute x, Rqvnt o:n the Future University 0£ Namibia XL Any o ther husj_nc ss ·1£ It./ 1/ (! )--' r/t ,J :i.6 Scpt em'.x~r 1977 I, as t he Engi stro.r of the L1~;tit11t0 , nhc L, rnoi~o often tiv:m ::1.ot , in daily cor,:tact ui th the ,/cudcnt ~: , lw.v0 t hu fol lo; r.i.11;:( viom-; to m.:-.::,:; r ory:1.rding Srntm :3tudento. in1c,1 t he~" fir::;t arn_vec, , tb'.7 \F!:cc ~- l·'.o.rp:,' lot to c1cc,l i:itl1. I t seemed t o ri1e t l1en tho.t t lle;y r.li::ec1. f1· ,~cl3- '.d.t:1 tl1c. ro;::;t of t~,c st uc~onts cmd it uas almost difficult for an out si der to toll 1:ho ,rn.s S:l\nU aric'. ,1ho •mf; ::10t. II01-mver , as time uei1t o;.1 , it 1:lcc::.,rnc c1.p9ar c11t tho.t hostilit ic::, had dcvcl opocl and SHA.NU studm1t s 1)cco.r::e a di stinct t roup :1llich chose special t abl es i n tho di ning r oom. The;y no l oac;or r.'i:ccd. freel y e:~copt uit h 2. feH STlJ\PO girls. This inturn brou.s;ht criticisms from S~:i'J)O boys uho nccusod t ho girls of bei ng sell-outs . These re;ports r ccc choc1 my office o.ncl I dicmissccl them as petty jea­ lousies over girls . But 2- patt er n 1:as soo:..1 sot , .'3'.!f,i,fU students became highly crit i cal of the gener al ::idmi 11i strati011 of the Insti tute e.nd of ten accused the Directo;_~ of po.r t i alit;y. It ::.iccms .J.:-3 if they did not 1:m1.t !:im to uonti on S1L\PO i n all hi s dealiL1f,13 o.t the In::ti t ut o. I romem:)er at 0110 st age t her e 1-rn. s bi g critici sm of t he ".dmi:..1i ctrotion ~Jecausc a S'.JAPO official ( I t hink it uas t he Presi dent hi msel f) w0-s ar r i vi ns at t he Air por t 0.11d 11aturally SHI\PO students , usinr, a ,'J'T,\:eO bu~; , 1_ront to meet hi rn . SHi\l'JU stuc1.ent s t ook exception to t hi. s and o. ccur.:ocl tllc 2ccl.mi:..1i strntion of cliscrimi:..1ati o11 . The r::: ener al po.tt cm1 of boho.vl our of [,Omo of tho SiL".NU r,t uclcnt s became insolent t m-;ardc t hor3e that Here i denti f.'icc1. uith adm:i.ni stro.ion . On my part , as HC[:;istr ar , I sooi1 lc,::,.r nt to i g:norr: some of tllcir i nsol ent behaviour and ut ter ;:,_nces. For inst ance , on Tuc ~ lay 2;' J\ucust , 1977 , I ,ms uor k i:..1~..( l at e i:..1 t he office , uhen I finished am~ uent outsi de 7 I f30.F S!-IMJU students i:..1 t he bi ~ bus that uas about to go to 11onn Gil ls to fetch S1II\.PO students uho wor e r ehear sing a pl ay. I asked t her.1 d1cre they uer c goL1g , and uhcn they sai d Roma Girls and uhcn tho dr iver e:cplai ned t o rne that he hc1cl tol d thern i.11vnin to get off t ho bus as t her e uould ciot be o:..1ough room on the r eturn trip , I r equest ed t hor:1 to get out of the bus.
Recommended publications
  • The Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Namibia's Colonization Process
    The Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Namibia’s Colonization Process By: Jonathan Baker Honors Capstone Through Professor Taylor Politics of Sub-Saharan Africa Baker, 2 Table of Contents I. Authors Note II. Introduction III. Pre-Colonization IV. Colonization by Germany V. Colonization by South Africa VI. The Struggle for Independence VII. The Decolonization Process VIII. Political Changes- A Reaction to Colonization IX. Immediate Economic Changes Brought on by Independence X. Long Term Political Effects (of Colonization) XI. Long Term Cultural Effects XII. Long Term Economic Effects XIII. Prospects for the Future XIV. Conclusion XV. Bibliography XVI. Appendices Baker, 3 I. Author’s Note I learned such a great deal from this entire honors capstone project, that all the knowledge I have acquired can hardly be covered by what I wrote in these 50 pages. I learned so much more that I was not able to share both about Namibia and myself. I can now claim that I am knowledgeable about nearly all areas of Namibian history and life. I certainly am no expert, but after all of this research I can certainly consider myself reliable. I have never had such an extensive knowledge before of one academic area as a result of a school project. I also learned a lot about myself through this project. I learned how I can motivate myself to work, and I learned how I perform when I have to organize such a long and complicated paper, just to name a couple of things. The strange inability to be able to include everything I learned from doing this project is the reason for some of the more random appendices at the end, as I have a passion for both numbers and trivia.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Record of 2019 Election Results
    Produced by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) Issue No 1: 2020 Your Record of 2019 Election Results These results are based on a spreadsheet received from the Electoral Commission of Namibia (ECN) on February 20 2020 with the exception that a mistake made by the ECN concerning the Windhoek Rural constituency result for the Presidential election has been corrected. The mistake, in which the votes for Independent candidate and the UDF candidate had been transposed, was spotted by the IPPR and has been acknowledged by the ECN. National Assembly Results REGION & Constituency Registered APP CDV CoD LPM NDP NEFF NPF NUDO PDM RDP RP SWANU SWAPO UDF WRP Total Votes 2019 2014 Voters Cast Turnout Turnout ZAMBEZI 45303 Judea Lyaboloma 3122 12 12 8 3 47 4 1 5 169 12 9 3 1150 5 2 1442 46.19 62.86 Kabbe North 3782 35 20 5 20 30 8 2 5 224 17 8 8 1780 14 88 2264 59.86 73.17 Kabbe South 3662 16 10 6 13 20 3 3 3 97 9 6 1 1656 4 4 1851 50.55 72.47 Katima Mulilo Rural 6351 67 26 12 25 62 12 4 6 304 26 8 7 2474 16 3 3052 48.06 84.78 Katima Mulilo Urban 13226 94 18 24 83 404 23 10 18 1410 70 42 23 5443 30 12 7704 58.25 58.55 Kongola 5198 67 35 17 21 125 10 5 5 310 32 40 17 1694 22 5 2405 46.27 65.37 Linyanti 3936 22 17 7 4 150 4 2 5 118 84 4 4 1214 12 0 1647 41.84 70.61 Sibbinda 6026 27 27 17 13 154 9 2 6 563 42 11 9 1856 27 5 2768 45.93 55.23 23133 51.06 ERONGO 113633 Arandis 7894 74 27 21 399 37 159 6 60 1329 61 326 8 2330 484 20 5341 67.66 74.97 Daures 7499 39 29 2 87 11 13 12 334 482 43 20 80 1424 1010 18 3604 54.86 61.7 Karibib 9337 78 103
    [Show full text]
  • Election Update 2004 Namibia No 1
    ELECTION UPDATE 2004 NAMIBIA number 1 5 November 2004 contents Pre-election political and policy settings 1 Political Parties 3 The Presidential Elections 5 General Elections 6 Manifestos 6 Regional Elections 9 Civil Society Participation 10 Framework for Election Conflict Prevention and Management 11 Compiled by Phaneul Kaapama EISA Editorial Team Jackie Kalley, Khabele Matlosa, Denis Kadima Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA Pre-election Political and dictates that the election of the Hence, in a few weeks time Policy Settings President should be by direct, Namibians will be going to the universal and equal suffrage. polls to participate in the third Introduction presidential and general Moreover, the same Article elections that are scheduled for At independence in 1990, the stipulates that no person shall November 15 and 16, 2004. Republic of Namibia, through be elected as President unless these will be followed by the its Constitution, embraced the he/she has received more than third Regional Council principles of democracy based fifty per cent (50%) of the votes elections that will be taking on electoral choice and cast and the necessary number place on November 29 and 30, multipartism. Hence, in line of ballots shall be cast until 2004. with these principles, the such result is reached. Article constitution as the formal 46(1)(a) of the constitution The raison d'etre of this source for the understanding of deals with the elections of the briefing paper is to examine the the political and governance members of the National political setting for the processes in the country lays Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report No
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 490 | FEBRUARY 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE w w w .usip.org North Korea in Africa: Historical Solidarity, China’s Role, and Sanctions Evasion By Benjamin R. Young Contents Introduction ...................................3 Historical Solidarity ......................4 The Role of China in North Korea’s Africa Policy .........7 Mutually Beneficial Relations and Shared Anti-Imperialism..... 10 Policy Recommendations .......... 13 The Unknown Soldier statue, constructed by North Korea, at the Heroes’ Acre memorial near Windhoek, Namibia. (Photo by Oliver Gerhard/Shutterstock) Summary • North Korea’s Africa policy is based African arms trade, construction of owing to African governments’ lax on historical linkages and mutually munitions factories, and illicit traf- sanctions enforcement and the beneficial relationships with African ficking of rhino horns and ivory. Kim family regime’s need for hard countries. Historical solidarity re- • China has been complicit in North currency. volving around anticolonialism and Korea’s illicit activities in Africa, es- • To curtail North Korea’s illicit activ- national self-reliance is an under- pecially in the construction and de- ity in Africa, Western governments emphasized facet of North Korea– velopment of Uganda’s largest arms should take into account the histor- Africa partnerships. manufacturer and in allowing the il- ical solidarity between North Korea • As a result, many African countries legal trade of ivory and rhino horns and Africa, work closely with the Af- continue to have close ties with to pass through Chinese networks. rican Union, seek cooperation with Pyongyang despite United Nations • For its part, North Korea looks to China, and undercut North Korean sanctions on North Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • IPPR Briefing Paper NO 44 Political Party Life in Namibia
    Institute for Public Policy Research Political Party Life in Namibia: Dominant Party with Democratic Consolidation * Briefing Paper No. 44, February 2009 By André du Pisani and William A. Lindeke Abstract This paper assesses the established dominant-party system in Namibia since independence. Despite the proliferation of parties and changes in personalities at the top, three features have structured this system: 1) the extended independence honeymoon that benefits and is sustained by the ruling SWAPO Party of Namibia, 2) the relatively effective governance of Namibia by the ruling party, and 3) the policy choices and political behaviours of both the ruling and opposition politicians. The paper was funded in part by the Danish government through Wits University in an as yet unpublished form. This version will soon be published by Praeger Publishers in the USA under Series Editor Kay Lawson. “...an emergent literature on African party systems points to low levels of party institutionalization, high levels of electoral volatility, and the revival of dominant parties.” 1 Introduction Political reform, democracy, and governance are centre stage in Africa at present. African analysts frequently point to the foreign nature of modern party systems compared to the pre-colonial political cultures that partially survive in the traditional arenas especially of rural politics. However, over the past two decades multi-party elections became the clarion call by civil society (not to mention international forces) for the reintroduction of democratic political systems. This reinvigoration of reform peaked just as Namibia gained its independence under provisions of the UN Security Council Resolution 435 (1978) and the supervision of the United Nations Transition Assistance Group (UNTAG).
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Democracy and Elections in Namibia
    MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ––––––––––––– ❑ ––––––––––––– Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA ISBN 1-920095-02-0 Debie LeBeau 9781920 095024 Edith Dima Order from: [email protected] EISA RESEARCH REPORT No 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 i MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ii EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 iii MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA BY DEBIE LEBEAU EDITH DIMA 2005 iv EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 Published by EISA 2nd Floor, The Atrium 41 Stanley Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa 2006 P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 1-920095-02-0 EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2005 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. –––––––––––– ❑ –––––––––––– Cover photograph: Yoruba Beaded Sashes Reproduced with the kind permission of Hamill Gallery of African Art, Boston, MA USA EISA Research Report, No. 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 v CONTENTS List of acronyms viii Acknowledgements x Preface xi 1. Background to multiparty democracy in Namibia 1 Historical background 1 The electoral system and its impact on gender 2 The ‘characters’ of the multiparty system 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • ANGOLA ZAMBIA Ovausciland RHODESIA BOTSWANA SOUTH
    4 • • ANGOLA ZAMBIA OvAUSCILAND : AV ANOO RHODESIA BOTSWANA SWAKOPMUND, • WINDHOEK WALVIS BAY LUDERITZ SOUTH AFRICA NAMIBIA IN OUTLINE Formerly known as South West Africa, Namibia was officially renamed in June 1968 by resolution of the United Nations General Assembly. On 27 October 1966, the UN formally assumed direct responsibility amibia for Namibia after unilaterally revoking the Mandate over the territory granted to South Africa by the League of Nations in 1920. However, the UN has so far been unable to translate this formal responsibility into effective control. South Africa refuses to recognize UN authority 1. Introduction in Namibia and continues to administer the country. Amnesty International is particularly concerned about the following issues in A relatively large but sparsely populated country, Namibia has a Namibia: total land area of some 825,000 square kilometers. It is strategically located in the south-western corner of Africa and is bordered on the the widespread use of detention without trial to suppress political west by the Atlantic Ocean. Neighbours to the north are Angola and opposition and intimidate opponents of continued South African rule Zambia, to the east Botswana, and to the south and east South Africa. in Namibia; Walvis Bay, the main port, is a South African enclave. the torture of political detainees; In 1974, Namibia's population was estimated at 852,000. Africans the application to Namibia of various South African security laws such comprised 88%, the whites constituted the remaining 12%. as the Terrorism Act, the Internal Security Act and the "Sabotage Act"; Despite this extreme racial imbalance, 43% of Namibia's land area the imprisonment in South African—rather than in Namibian—prisons is reserved for occupation by the white settler minority under South of Namibians convicted of political offences, and the South African Africa's 1964 Odendaal Commission proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography-Sam-Nujoma-332D79.Pdf
    BIOGRAPHY Name: Sam Nujoma Date of Birth: 12 May 1929 Place of Birth: Etunda-village, Ongandjera district, North- Western Namibia – (Present Omusati Region) Parents: Father: Daniel Uutoni Nujoma - (subsistence farmer) Mother: Helvi Mpingana Kondombolo- (subsistence farmer) Children: 6 boys and 4 girls. From Childhood: Like all boys of those days, looked after his parents’ cattle, as well as assisting them at home in general work, including in the cultivation of land. Qualifications: Attended Primary School at Okahao Finnish Mission School 1937-1945; In the year 1946, Dr. Nujoma moved to the coastal town of Walvisbay to live with his aunt Gebhart Nandjule, where in 1947 at the age of 17 he began his first employment at a general store for a monthly salary of 10 Shillings. It was in Walvis Bay that he got exposed to modern world politics by meeting soldiers from Argentina, Norway and other parts of Europe who had been brought there during World War II. Soon after, at the beginning of 1949 Dr. Nujoma went to live in Windhoek with his uncle Hiskia Kondombolo. In Windhoek he started working for the South African Railways and attended adult night school at St. Barnabas in the Windhoek Old Location. He further studied for his Junior Certificate through correspondence at the Trans-Africa Correspondence College in South Africa. Marital Status: On 6 May 1956, Dr Nujoma got married to Kovambo Theopoldine Katjimune. They were blessed with 4 children: Utoni Daniel (1952), John Ndeshipanda (1955), Sakaria Nefungo (1957) and Nelago (1959), who sadly passed away at the age of 18 months, while Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute for Public Policy Research
    Institute for Public Policy Research Afrobarometer Briefing Paper No. 88 August 2010 Namibia Political Party Prospects Leading to the 2009 Elections Introduction The structure of government and opposition in Namibia as a dominant party system became solidified after independence in 1990 (Du Pisani and Lindeke, IPPR 2009). But, over the past year a number of new political parties have been formed to challenge the established ruling party, SWAPO Party of Namibia, as it has been officially called since independence. These new parties are also challenging the existing opposition parties in Namibia. These new parties raise the possibility of breaking the effective monopoly of voters from the north-central regions, where up to now SWAPO has received enough votes to automatically win a majority. Furthermore, the new parties may receive votes reallocated from different ethnic groups and populations allied to existing opposition parties or from those who have fallen out of electoral participation. The fixation among politicians and voters on the coming elections scheduled in November 2009 has already challenged the peace and stability of the country in ways unseen since independence. Popular emotions are running high, judging by the unprecedented confrontations around recent by-elections and rallies. Missing so far has been reliable information as represented here by the Afrobarometer survey, which gives a national picture of potential party support a year ahead of elections. Support For Political Parties Figure 1 below shows the current projections of the parties likely to gain votes according to respondents’ preferences. Namibians were asked, If a presidential election were held tomorrow, which party’s candidate would you vote for? The current preferences reported in the survey are SWAPO at 50%, opposition parties at 25%, and undecided at 25%.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of the Lutheran Church in Namibia
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2009 The Transformation of the Lutheran Church in Namibia Katherine Caufield Arnold College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Arnold, Katherine Caufield, "The rT ansformation of the Lutheran Church in Namibia" (2009). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 251. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/251 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Introduction Although we kept the fire alive, I well remember somebody telling me once, “We have been waiting for the coming of our Lord. But He is not coming. So we will wait forever for the liberation of Namibia.” I told him, “For sure, the Lord will come, and Namibia will be free.” -Pastor Zephania Kameeta, 1989 On June 30, 1971, risking persecution and death, the African leaders of the two largest Lutheran churches in Namibia1 issued a scathing “Open Letter” to the Prime Minister of South Africa, condemning both South Africa’s illegal occupation of Namibia and its implementation of a vicious apartheid system. It was the first time a church in Namibia had come out publicly against the South African government, and after the publication of the “Open Letter,” Anglican and Roman Catholic churches in Namibia reacted with solidarity.
    [Show full text]
  • National Archives of Namibia Findaid 2/238
    National Archives of Namibia Findaid 2/238 Findaid 2/238 A.1058 United Nations Oral History on Namibia October 2017 National Archives of Namibia Findaid 2/238: A.1058 United Nations Oral History on Namibia Arranged by Werner Hillebrecht Windhoek, October 2017 © National Archives of Namibia & Dag Hammarskjöld Library Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA Republic of Namibia Ministry of Education, Arts and Culture National Archives of Namibia P/Bag 13250 Windhoek Namibia Tel. +264–61–2935211 (switchboard), 2935210 or 2935208 (reading room) Fax +264–61–2935207 [email protected] ii Findaid 2/238 United Nations Oral History A.1058 Private Accession A. 1058 United Nations Oral History on Namibia Introduction The United Nations, in cooperation with Yale University, embarked on an oral history project about the history of the UN. This included United Nations action with regard to Namibia, in particular the involvement in the transition to independence. Sixteen interviews with key players in this process were conducted in 1998 – 1999. The oral interviews as well as the transcriptions are available at Yale University and on the website of the United Nations’ Dag Hammarskjöld Library, New York. This accession consists of downloads of the digital transcriptions, which can be accessed on the local server, and printouts of the texts. The oral recordings are not available at the National Archives, and can only be accessed online via the Dag Hammarskjöld Library. Researchers should take note that the transcriptions frequently contain misspellings of personal names and place names. No effort from the side of the National Archives has been made to correct the spelling.
    [Show full text]
  • The Executive Survey General Information and Guidelines
    The Executive Survey General Information and Guidelines Dear Country Expert, In this section, we distinguish between the head of state (HOS) and the head of government (HOG). • The Head of State (HOS) is an individual or collective body that serves as the chief public representative of the country; his or her function could be purely ceremonial. • The Head of Government (HOG) is the chief officer(s) of the executive branch of government; the HOG may also be HOS, in which case the executive survey only pertains to the HOS. • The executive survey applies to the person who effectively holds these positions in practice. • The HOS/HOG pair will always include the effective ruler of the country, even if for a period this is the commander of foreign occupying forces. • The HOS and/or HOG must rule over a significant part of the country’s territory. • The HOS and/or HOG must be a resident of the country — governments in exile are not listed. • By implication, if you are considering a semi-sovereign territory, such as a colony or an annexed territory, the HOS and/or HOG will be a person located in the territory in question, not in the capital of the colonizing/annexing country. • Only HOSs and/or HOGs who stay in power for 100 consecutive days or more will be included in the surveys. • A country may go without a HOG but there will be no period listed with only a HOG and no HOS. • If a HOG also becomes HOS (interim or full), s/he is moved to the HOS list and removed from the HOG list for the duration of their tenure.
    [Show full text]