General Assembly's Agenda for Many Years but South Africa Had Impeded All Efferts to Reach a Conclusion and Had Rejected All the Solutions Proposed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Assembly's Agenda for Many Years but South Africa Had Impeded All Efferts to Reach a Conclusion and Had Rejected All the Solutions Proposed United Nations UN LIBRARY-f!J~ FOURTH COMMITTEE GENERAL ~ ~ 32nd meeting DEC 7 1976~ i/ held on ASSEMBLY ""'""?~ Thursday, 25 November 1976 THIRTY-FIRST SESSION LIJNLSA COLLECiiON at 10.30 a.m. Official Records* . New York SUMMARY RECORD OF THE 32nd MEETING Chairman : Mr. VRAALSEN (Norway) CONTENTS AGENDA ITEM 85: QUESTION OF NAMIBIA (continued) AGENDA ITEM 25: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECLARATION ON THE GRANTING OF INDEPENDENCE TO COLONIAL COUNTRIES AND PEOPLES (continued) • This record is subject to correction. Corrections should be inco~or~ted in a copy_ ot Distr. GENERAL the record and should be sent within one week of the date of publrcanon to the Chief, Official Records Editing Section, room I..X-2332. A/C.4/31/SR.32 2 December 1976 Corrections will be i~sued shortly after the end of the session, in a separate fascicle for ENGLISH each Committee. ORIGINAL: FRENCH r6-91343 / ... A/C.4/31/SR.32 English Page 2 The meeting was called to order at 11 a.m. AGENDA TIME 35: QUESTION OF NAMIBIA (A/31/23/Add.l, A/31/23/Add.3, A/31/24 (vol. I and II), A/31/45, A/31/92, A/31/155, A/31/181, A/31/190 and Corr.l, A/31/197, A/31/213, A/31/237; A/C.4/31/L.29) (continued) 1. Mr. GIGNAC (Canada) noted with regret that the situation in Namibia had evolved little in substantive terms since the Fourth Committee's last debate on the question. It had been ten years since the United Nations terminated the South African mandate over Namibia and five years since the International Court of Justice gave its advisory opinion on that matter. Moreover, 13 resolutions to that effect had been adopted by the Security Council. Aside from those resolutions, the Security Council had repeatedly deplored the militarization of Namibia, had enjoined the Repvbli c of South Africa to withdraw its illegal administration from Namibia and had declared itself in support of a reasonable means of enabling the people of Namibia freely to determine their own future. 2. Canada had whole-heartedly supported the various resolutions and initiatives. It had advised the Government of South Africa of its position and had taken measures to ensure that no recognition was given by it to the illegal South African administration of Namibia. Canada maintained no diplomatic or consular representation in Namibia and warned any Canadian company or citizen proposing to invest or travel there that they did so at their own risk. It had also prohibited Canadians travelling on diplomatic or official passports from going to the Territory and, in addition, had placed an embargo on the sale of arms to South Africa. While recognizing that the efforts undertaken so far had not succeeded, it was essential to continue supporting all action taken by the Security Council to promote a peaceful solution and, in particular, Security Council resolutions 366 (1976) and 385 (1976). 3. With respect to the Constitutional Conference being held in Windhoek, he noted that it was being conducted by representatives of various ethnic groups in Namibia but that no provision had been made to ensure the presence of all political representatives of the Territory or of organizations such as SWAPO which, it was clear, had popular support. Bearing those factors in mind, as well as the fact that the discussions were being held without reference to the United Nations, his Government considered that the discussions could not lead to measures that would ensure the development of an independent and united Namibia through a fully democratic process and was convinced that the Turnhalle discussions would ultimately fail. 4. His Government had watched with deep concern the growing number of violent incidents provoked by the continuing South African presence in Namibia. As a result of those incidents four Namibians had been sentenced to death. Canada believed that those sentences were invalid in law in view of the illegality of the South African presence in Namibia and that they could only have a negative effect on the prospects for a peaceful resolution; it therefore urged that the sentences not be carried out. I . .. A/C. 4/31/SR. 32 English Page 3 (Mr. Cignac, Canada) 5. In a move made in Pretoria on 29 August 1976, the Canadian Government had set forth those views before the South African Government and appealed to it to reach an accommodation as soon as possible with the United Nations on the future of Namibia, pointing out that otherwise, the situation might deteriorate so far as to become a threat to international peace and security. The response of the South African Government had been disappointing to say the least and had demonstrated that the latter's position remained unchanged. 6. However, in recent months developments in southern Africa and the intense political and diplomatic activity going on in both Rhodesia and South Africa gave rise to some hope. Although progress was very slow, his Government was convinced that the situation in Namibia could be resolved provided the international community made the necessary effort. 7. In the meantime, the United Nations should continue to pursue its efforts in favour of Namibian independence, in particular, by making concrete arrangements such as elaborating programmes designed to prepare Namibians for independence. Of particular importance in that sense were the United Nations Educational and Training Programme for Southern Africa and the Institute for Namibia. His delegation had already had occasion to draw attention to its support for UNETPSA and its intention of supporting the Institute because of the role which the latter would play during the difficult period that would follow independence. 8. Even before the budget of the Institute had been finalized Canada had announced its intention of contributing $100,000 to the Institute. In March, during the Pledging Conference for all programmes for southern Africa, Canada had indicated that a further contribution to the Institute for Namibia would be subject to assessment of the operations and programmes of the Institute, its over-all budget, financial prospects and the support it received. Unfortunately, the constant efforts it had made since March 1976 to obtain details of the Institute's budget and operations had met with little success and it had therefore been unable, so far, to commit further funds. While his delegation understood that the budget had to be considered by various bodies and that that was a lengthy process which was no doubt justified, it hoped that the process could be speeded up for, in the absence of an authoritative document explaining the programmes and financing of the Institute, it was not surprising that voluntary contributions for 1976 had not reached the original target. None the less, the Institute was now in operation and he hoped that the budget estimates and supporting documents concerning programme development would be revised in a pragmatic form to show progressive development from year to year. His delegation also hoped that, as in the case of the Trust Fund for South Africa and UNETPSA, there would continue to be an ad hoc Committee for the Fund composed of seven or eight diplomats who would maintain a keen interest in the Institute's development. I . .. A/C.4/31/SR.32 English Page 4 (Mr. Cignac, Canada) 9. In respect to the organization of United Nations activities relating to Namibia, his delegation had noticed that within the Secretariat there were many competent officials working on such questions but that, unfortunately, their activities often overlapped; it asked the Secretary-General to examine the matter and remedy it. 10. In conclusion, he noted that the present Commissioner for Namibia, Mr. MacBride, did not plan to seek reappointment for a further term, and therefore warmly thanked him for the commitment, energy and great determination he had displayed in the performance of his important functions. 11. Mr. ABDALLA (United Arab Emirates) expressed satisfaction at the participation of SWAPO in the Committee's work on Namibia and said that SWAPO had provided very useful information. 12. The question of Namibia had been on the General Assembly's agenda for many years but South Africa had impeded all efferts to reach a conclusion and had rejected all the solutions proposed. 13. His Government attached very great importance to the question of Namibia for it considered that the presence of South Africa in the Territery was a threat to Africa and to the rest of the world. 14. In defiance of the decisions of the United Nations and of world public opinion, South Africa continued to consolidate its presen·:~e in Namibia by fragmenting its territory through its policy of bantustar:-i :z,r+-ion. It thought to delude the world by convening a so-called Constitutional Conference in which representatives chosen by it participated, while the true representatives of the Namibian people (SWAPO) were kept outside. In addition, the Pretoria regime continued to oppress the Namibian people, whom it brutally repressed. The United Nations had repeatedly found that the South African policy in Namibia ~as a crime against mankind. In addition, the illegality of South Africa's administration of Namibia had been confirmed in an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice. 15. His delegation believed, therefore, that the only acceptable solution was one that would enable the Namibian people to exercise its right to self-determination and independence in accordance with the provisions of General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV). The United Nations Council for Namibia should be able to meet in the Territory in order better to carry out its mandate and help the population of the Territory to prepare for independence.
Recommended publications
  • Can Home Rule in the District of Columbia Survive the Chadha Decision?
    Catholic University Law Review Volume 33 Issue 4 Summer 1984 Article 2 1984 Can Home Rule in the District of Columbia Survive the Chadha Decision? Bruce Comly French Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Bruce C. French, Can Home Rule in the District of Columbia Survive the Chadha Decision?, 33 Cath. U. L. Rev. 811 (1984). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol33/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CAN HOME RULE IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SURVIVE THE CHADHA DECISION? Bruce Comly French* More than a decade has passed since the enactment of the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act (Home Rule Act).' In this Act, the Congress delegated much of its con- stitutional authority affecting the District of Columbia2 to an elected * Associate Professor of Law, Claude W. Pettit College of Law, Ohio Northern Uni- versity. Lecturer, Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America. B.A., The American University, 1969; M.A., The American University, 1970; J.D., Antioch College School of Law, 1975. The author was Legislative Counsel to the Council of the District of Columbia (1979-1983) and Staff Director and Counsel to the Committee on Government Operations, Council of the District of Columbia (1975-1978). The author recognizes and appreciates the assistance of M.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 154 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JUNE 5, 2008 No. 92 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Rev. Steven Ailes from Peru, IN. Rev- called to order by the Honorable MARK The Honorable MARK L. PRYOR led erend Ailes has served in seven church- L. PRYOR, a Senator from the State of the Pledge of Allegiance, as follows: es in Indiana. He is a civic leader in Arkansas. Peru as president of the Rotary Club I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Repub- and has been the chairman and a mem- ber of many foundations. He has PRAYER lic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. brought students to this Capitol from The PRESIDING OFFICER. Today’s f Peru, IN, with regularity. opening prayer will be offered by guest I have known Reverend Ailes well be- APPOINTMENT OF ACTING Chaplain Rev. Steven N. Ailes, Main cause of his son Justin who is a distin- PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE Street United Methodist Church, Peru, guished graduate of the University of IN. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Indianapolis and who came onto my clerk will please read a communication The guest Chaplain offered the fol- staff and served for many years as a to the Senate from the President pro lowing prayer: very able public servant. It has been a tempore (Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • » South Pacific Commission Report of the T E N T H S O U T H P a C I F I C C O H F E K E N C E Suva, Fiji, I5th September
    I - » SOUTH PACIFIC COMMISSION REPORT OF THE TENTH SOUTH PACIFIC COHFE K E N C E SUVA, FIJI, I5TH SEPTEMBER - 25TH SEPTEMBER, 1970 Chairman: The Honourable S.I1. Koya ^SommiBsioner for the United Kingdom on the South Pacific Commission/7 NOUMEA HEw' CAHiDONIA 1970 ATTENDANCE AT THE TENTH SOUTH PACIFIC CONFERENCE Chairman The Hon. S.M. Koya, Commissioner for the United Kingdom on the South Pacific Commission Representatives from South Pacific Territories and Countries American Samoa High Talking Chief Fofo I.F.Sunia Delegate British Solomon Islands The Hon. Gordon Siama Delegate Protectorate Mr Solomon Maraoloni Alternate Delegate Cook Islands Dr Joseph Williams Delegate Mr Papamama Pokino Alternate Delegate Mr Alan Armistead Adviser Mr Frank Thorburn Adviser Mr Russell Gerrard Observer Fiji The Hon. Vijay R. Singh Delegate The Hon. Jonate Mavoa Alternate Delegate The Hon. J.B. Naisara Adviser Mr B. Vunibobo Adviser Dr S. Lomani Adviser Mr C. Amoutch Adviser French Polynesia Mr Romuald Allain Delegate Mr Eugene Haereraaroa Alternate Delegate Mr Henri Elix Adviser Gilbert and Ellice The Hon. Reuben K. Uatioa Delegate Islands Colony Mr Naboua Ratieta Alternate Delegate Guam Mr J.C. Guerrero Delegate Nauru President Hammer deRoburt Delegate Mr Kinza Clodumar Adviser Miss Echo Gadong Adviser New Caledonia Rev. Father J. Kapea Nepamoindou Delegate New Hebrides Rev. Father Gerard Leymang Delegate (Condominium) Mr Iolu Abbil Delegate Mr Jacques Fabre Adviser Mr Keith Woodward Adviser Niue The Hon. Robert R. Rex Delegate The Hon. Enetama Alternate Delegate Mr S.P.E. Tagelagi Adviser Mr T.M. Chapman Adviser Territory of Papua Mr Oala Oala-Rarua Delegate and new Guinea Mr John Poe Delegate Mr T.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 88-171 Be It Enacted Hy the Senate and House Of
    304 PUBLIC LAW 88-171-NOV. 4, 1963 [77 STAT. Public Law 88-171 November 4, 1963 AN ACT LH- R- 6481]— rj,^ permit the government of Guam to authorize a public authority to undertake urban renewal and housing activities. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Guam. United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Legisla- and'^hous'in"^rc- ^^^^ ^^ Guam may by law grant to a public corporate authority, tivities. existing or to be created by or under such law, powers to undertake urban (renewal and housing activities in Guam. Such legislature may by law provide for the appointment, terms of office, or removal of the members of such authority and for the powers of such author­ ity, including authority to accept whatever benefits the Federal Government may make available, and to do all things, to exercise any and all powers, and to assume and fulfill any and all obligations, duties, responsibilities, and requirements, including but not limited to those relating to planning or zoning, necessary or desirable for receiving such Federal assistance, except that such authority shall not be given any power of taxation, nor any power to pledge the faith and credit of the territory of Guam tor any loan whatever. SEC. 2. The Legislature of Guam may by law authorize such 64 Stat. 384. autlioritv, any provision of the Organic Act of Guam, or any other 48 use 1421 ^Q^ Qf Congress to the contrary notwithstanding, to borrow money note. and to issue notes, bonds, and other obligations of such character and maturity, with such security, and in such manner as the legislature may provide.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly at Its Seventeenth Session.G/ 4
    UNITED NATIONS Distr. GENERAL LIMITED A/AC.109/L.98/Add.1 ASSEMBLY 19 February 1964 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH ----------------------------~_..,,,._,,.. ','~,~- SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON THE SITUATION WITH REGARD TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECLARL'\.TION ON THE GRANTING OF INDEPENDENCE TO COLONIAL COUNTRIES AND PEOPLES DECLARATION ON THE GRANTING OF INDEPENDENCE TO COLONIAL CCUNTRIES AND PEOPLES: INFORMATION ON TERRITORIES TO WHICH THE DECLARATION APPLIES Working Paper prepared by the Secretariat TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraphs Page INTRODUCTION •••••••••• 1-4 2 ADMTIilISTERING POWER: AUSTRALIA I. Trust Territory of NAURU ••••• 1-20 3 11 & Ill. ,PAFUA AND THE TRUST TERRITORY OF roof GUINEA 1-20 8 IV. COCOS (KEELING) ISLANDS •••••• ~ ••••• 1-20 18 ADMDITSTERING POWER: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. TRUST TERRITORY OF THE PACIFIC ISLANDS. }-25 22 VI". GUAM.. ~.. • '. '. '. ". ". ••••• 1-22 28 VII. AMERICAN SAMOA ••• • ••••• 1-27 32 ArMINISTERING POWER: NEW' ZEALAIID VIII. COOK ISLANDS '. '. 1-29 38 IX'. NIUE..··.. ';-, ,,~ '. • 1--17 46 X. TOKELAU ISLANDS •• •••••• 1-14 50 AIMINISTERING 'POWER: FFANCE AND UNITED KINGDOM XI. NEW HEBRIDES •••••••••••• .' """ 1-31 53 AIMINISTERING POWER: UNITED KING:roM ' XII. GILBERT &. ELLICE ISLANDS 1-24 60 XIII. PITCAIRN ISIAND 1-11 66 XIV. SOLOMON ISLANDS 1-21 68 XV. BRUNEI·· ••••••• . ... 1-33 74 XVI. HONG KONG •••• . ... 1-35 82 64-03760 / ... JJjJ- A/AC.l09/L.98/Add.l .English Page 2 Il\TTRODUCTION 1. The report of the Special Committee to the General Asserrbly at its eighteenth session, which was approved by the Assembly in its resolution 1956 (XVIII) of 11 December 1963, states: llWith regard to the Territories vThich still remain to be considered by the Special Committee, it is the intention of the Special Committee to consider them as a matter priority in 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBRARY Iouth PACIFIC COMMISSION
    HTOGBSSS RBPOM? OR BESOIPGROHS , OP gBB SECOro SOOTg PACIFIC OCRTOHEKCB - • HOOMEA 15 ~ 27 APRIL 1955 LIBRARY iOUTH PACIFIC COMMISSION HODMEA S&3H PACIFIC craoirssioH 1955 Ill, IBB SOTTTS PACIFIC COMMISSION The South Eacifio Conmission is an advisoiy and consultative body set up by tha six ejovexnmonts responsible for the administration of island territories in the South Pacific region. Its purpose is to re- ccffimend to ihe member goveimneats means for promoting the well-being of the peoples of those territories. It is concerned with social, economic and he^th matters. Its headquarters are at Noumea, New Caledonia. The Conmission was established by an agreement between the Gov- ernments of Australia, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States of America, signed at Canberra on the 6th February, 1947, and finally ratified on the 29th July, 1948. Until the 7th November, 1951, the area of the Commission's activities comprised territories lying generally south of the equator from and including Neth- erlands New Guinea in tha west to tha French Establishments in Oceania ' and ELtcaim in the east. On 7th November, 1951, an additional agreement was signed at Connission headquarters in Noumea on behalf of the six par- ticipating Governments, extending the scope of the Conmission to include Guam and tha Truot Territory of the Pacific. Islands under Umted States administratioa. J "f ' T ' The Conmission consists of twelve Commissioners, two from each government, and from 1948 until 1953 met twice a year. It new normally holds one session each year. There are two auxiliary bodies, the Research Council and the South fecifio Conference, The Research Council, which assembles once a year, held its first , meeting in May 1949, Members are appointed by the Commission, and are sel- ected for thair special knowledge of tha questions vrith which tha Commission is concerned, and the problems of the territories in these fields.
    [Show full text]
  • 48 U.S.C. 1422C(A)
    Page 105 TITLE 48—TERRITORIES AND INSULAR POSSESSIONS § 1422c ignation, removal by recall, or permanent dis- Governor on Nov. 3, 1970, effective Jan. 1, 1970, and all ability of the Governor, or the death, resigna- other amendments unless otherwise provided effective tion, or permanent disability of a Governor- Jan. 4, 1971, see section 13 of Pub. L. 90–497, set out as elect, or for any other reason, the Lieutenant a note under section 1422 of this title. Governor or Lieutenant Governor-elect shall be- come the Governor, to hold office for the un- § 1422c. Executive agencies and instrumentalities expired term and until he or his successor shall (a) Appointment of heads; establishment of merit have been duly elected and qualified at the next system; Civil Service Commission regular election for Governor. The Governor shall, except as otherwise pro- (c) Temporary disability or temporary absence of vided in this chapter or the laws of Guam, ap- Lieutenant Governor point, by and with the advice and consent of the In case of the temporary disability or tem- legislature, all heads of executive agencies and porary absence of the Lieutenant Governor, or instrumentalities. The legislature shall estab- during any period when the Lieutenant Gov- lish a merit system and, as far as practicable, ernor is acting as Governor, the speaker of the appointments and promotions shall be made in Guam Legislature shall act as Lieutenant Gov- accordance with such merit system. The Gov- ernor. ernment of Guam may by law establish a Civil (d) Permanent vacancy in office of Lieutenant Service Commission to administer the merit Governor system.
    [Show full text]
  • (7) Section 10 (33 U.S.C. 1009) Is Amended by Changing the Phrase at the End Thereof from "And 9"' to "9, and 12." (8) Section 12 (33 U.S.C
    80 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-552-SEPT. 2, 1966 375 (7) Section 10 (33 U.S.C. 1009) is amended by changing the phrase at the end thereof from "and 9"' to "9, and 12." (8) Section 12 (33 U.S.C. 1011) is amended to read as follows: ^^P;^'^^^"''^ "SEC. 12. (a) All sea areas within fifty miles from the nearest land shall be prohibited zones, subject to extensions or reduction effectuated in accordance with the terms of the Convention, which shall be pub­ lished in regulations prescribed by the Secretary. "(b) With respect to the reduction or extension of the zones described under the terms of the Convention, the Secretary shall give notice thereof by publication of such information in Notices to Mari­ ners issued by the United States Coast Guard and United States Navy." (9) Section 13 (33 U.S.C. 1012) is repealed. «*P«^I- (10) Section 17 (33 U.S.C. 1015) is amended to read as follows: "SEC. 17. (a) This Act shall become effective upon the date of its Effective date. enactment or upon the date the amended Convention becomes effective as to the United States, whichever is the later date. "(b) Any rights or liabilities existing on the effective date of this Act shall not be affected by the enactment of this Act. Any proce­ dures or rules or regulations in effect on the effective date of this Act shall remain in effect until modified or superseded under the authority of this Act. Any reference in any other law or rule or regulation prescribed pursuant to law to the 'International Convention for the Prevention of the Pollution of the Sea by Oil, 1954,' shall be deemed ^^ UST 2989.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Act of Guam.Xml
    G:\COMP\GUAM\ORGANIC ACT OF GUAM.XML ORGANIC ACT OF GUAM [Chapter 512 of the 81st Congress; Approved August 1, 1950] [As Amended Through P.L. 108–378, Enacted October 30, 2004] øCurrency: This publication is a compilation of the text of Chapter 512 of the 81st Congress. It was last amended by the public law listed in the As Amended Through note above and below at the bottom of each page of the pdf version and reflects current law through the date of the enactment of the public law listed at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/comps/¿ øNote: While this publication does not represent an official version of any Federal statute, substantial efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of its contents. The official version of Federal law is found in the United States Statutes at Large and in the United States Code. The legal effect to be given to the Statutes at Large and the United States Code is established by statute (1 U.S.C. 112, 204).¿ AN ACT To provide a civil government for Guam, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, ø48 U.S.C. 1421 note¿ That this Act may be cited as the ‘‘Organic Act of Guam’’. SEC. 2. ø48 U.S.C. 1421¿ The territory ceded to the United States in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty of Peace be- tween the United States and Spain, signed at Paris, December 10, 1898, and proclaimed April 11, 1899, and known as the island of Guam in the Marianas Islands, shall continue to be known as Guam.
    [Show full text]
  • 842 PUBLIC LAW 90-497-SEPT. 11, 1968 SEC. 13. Section 2 of The
    842 PUBLIC LAW 90-497-SEPT. 11, 1968 [82 STAT. Interior Depart­ ment authority. SEC. 13. Section 2 of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands (68 Stat. 497; 48 U.S.C. 1541) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection (c) : " (c) The relations between such government and the Federal Gov­ ernment in all matters not the program responsibility of another Fed­ eral department or agency shall be under the general administrative supervision of the Secretary of the Interior." Repeal. SEC. 14. Effective on the date of enactment of this Act, section 19 of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands (68 Stat. 505; 48 U.S.C. 1632) is hereby repealed. SEC. 15. Effective on the date of enactment of this Act, section 8(b) (i) of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands (68 Stat. 497,500; 48 U.S.C. 1574(b)), as amended, is further amended by (a) deleting the third and fourth sentences thereof, and (b) by deleting the eighth and ninth sentences thereof and substituting in lieu thereof the follow­ ing sentence: "The bonds so issued shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed that specified by the legislature, payable semiannually.". Effective date. SEC. 16. Those provisions of this Act necessary to authorize the holding of an election for Governor and Lieutenant Governor on November 3, 1970, shall be effective on January 1, 1970. All other provisions of this Act, unless otherwise expressly provided herein, shall be effective January 4,1971. Short title. SEC.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 12 February 2019
    United Nations A/AC.109/2019/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 February 2019 Original: English Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples Guam Working paper prepared by the Secretariat Contents Page The Territory at a glance ......................................................... 3 I. Constitutional, legal and political issues ............................................ 4 II. Military and related issues ....................................................... 6 III. Land issues .................................................................... 7 IV. Budget ....................................................................... 8 V. Economy ..................................................................... 8 A. General ................................................................... 8 B. Tourism .................................................................. 9 C. Transport and communications ............................................... 9 D. Water system, sanitation and utilities .......................................... 9 E. Renewable energy .......................................................... 10 F. Agriculture and fisheries .................................................... 10 VI. Social conditions ............................................................... 11 Note: The information contained in the present working paper has been derived from public sources, including those of the territorial Government,
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 11 March 2014
    United Nations A/AC.109/2014/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 11 March 2014 Original: English Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples Guam Working paper prepared by the Secretariat Contents Page The Territory at a glance .................................................. 3 I. Constitutional, legal and political issues ............................................ 5 II. Military and related issues .................................................. 7 III. Land issues .................................................. .................. 8 IV. Budget .................................................. ..................... 9 V. Economy .................................................. ................... 10 A. General .................................................. ................. 10 B. Tourism .................................................. ................ 10 C. Transport and communications ............................................... 11 D. Water system, sanitation and utilities .......................................... 11 E. Agriculture and fisheries .................................................. 12 VI. Social conditions .................................................. ............. 12 A. Labour .................................................. ................. 12 Note : The information contained in the present working paper has been derived from public sources, including those of the territorial Government
    [Show full text]