DOCSLIB.ORG

Modernising Pathology Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modernising Pathology Services Modernising Pathology Services Modernising Pathology Services READER INFORMATION Policy Estates HR/Workforce Performance Management IM&T Planning Finance Clinical Partnership Working Document Purpose Best Practice Guidance ROCR Ref: Gateway Ref: 1516 Title Modernising Pathology Services Author DH Pathology Modernisation Team Publication Date Feb 2004 Target Audience PCT CEs, NHS Trusts CEs, StHAs CEs, Pathology managers and staff Circulation List Description Best practice guidance describes how pathology service design, particularly through developing managed networks, can help build the capacity required to deliver key targets and commitments. Services should focus on patients’ needs, and be kept up to date for their benefit, through new, appropriate and properly evaluated technologies, techniques and tests. Cross Ref Pathology – The Essential Service – Draft Guidance on Modernising Pathology Services Superceded Docs none Action required none Timing Contact Details Pathology Modernisation Team Area 423 Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG [email protected] For recipient use Contents Foreword from Minister of State for Health, John Hutton MP 1 Executive Summary 3 Chapter 1: Introduction 7 Chapter 2: Next Steps Locally: Building Capacity 13 Chapter 3: Modernisation Strategies 22 Chapter 4: National Support for Local Action 32 Annex 1: Sources of Further Information and Guidance 36 Annex 2: Pathology Modernisation Guidance Implementation Group Membership 49 Modernising Pathology Services Foreword from Minister of State for Health, John Hutton MP Pathology services are essential to delivery of the high quality evidence-based treatments and care which patients receive in the NHS, yet much of the work that pathology staff do is often invisible to the patients that they serve. I am therefore delighted that this document brings pathology services into focus as a key component of the modern NHS heralded by The NHS Plan. The new guidance reflects our commitment to ensuring that pathology services are able to become a modern service able to respond to the future challenges posed by new scientific and technical developments, changing practice and changing public perceptions and expectations. The new approach to delivering these vital services will help us both to raise the profile of pathology and make more effective a service which provides an essential foundation for good clinical care. The development of new pathology networks and changes in the skill-mix of the workforce are crucial ingredients in this programme of change. The implementation of Modernising Pathology Services will also be supported by a total of £9.1 million revenue and £54 million capital funding over the period 2003/04 – 2005/06, helping pathology services to expand. John Hutton Minister of State for Health 1 Modernising Pathology Services Executive Summary i The Department of Health launched a Pathology Modernisation Programme in 1999, with the key goals of improving the quality and efficiency of NHS pathology services and encouraging the introduction of new technologies and practices to deliver high quality care for patients. Between 1999/00 and 2002/03, capital funding of £28 million was invested in 39 demonstration projects across England. ii A consultation paper Pathology – The Essential Service – Draft Guidance on Modernising Pathology Services1 proposed future principles, goals and objectives for NHS pathology. The key change proposed was the introduction of managed pathology networks across NHS trusts as a model of service delivery to address the workforce and technology challenges facing the NHS. This document builds on the responses received. It sets out steps that can be taken locally to develop pathology modernisation strategies and describes action which will be taken nationally to support developments. Next Steps Locally iii The steps proposed in this document will help the NHS build capacity to develop better pathology services as well as putting in place basic building blocks to support clinical services to meet key priorities and targets by: • setting up a managed pathology network, or similarly robust mechanism, identifying local leaders, appointing and resourcing network managers and clinical champions • reviewing local pathology services and establishing and promulgating implementation arrangements to achieve change and support local clinical and health protection requirements • participating in audit of delivery and continuous quality improvement • undertaking a workforce review and skill mix profile of the staff required to deliver improved services, linked to a training needs analysis to facilitate engagement with the workforce development arm of the SHA. 1 Department of Health. Pathology – the Essential Service – Draft Guidance on Modernising Pathology Services. London: Department of Health 2002 3 Modernising Pathology Services iv The key focus is redesigning services to build pathology capacity to support delivery of targets set out in Improvement, Expansion and Reform: the next 3 years 2. Advice on best practice for implementing change is described for both NHS and Foundation Trusts. Modernising Strategies vIt is recognised that managed pathology networks can provide a wider strategic context for pathology services planning. Modernisation strategies which will support service development are outlined including: • integrating pathology into wider service developments • redesigning systems • decreasing inappropriate variation • making effective use of IT and new technologies • improving information management. Next Steps Nationally vi As part of a national focus to increase diagnostic capacity and support the NHS to implement change in pathology services, the Department of Health will set up an implementation oversight group. They will: • disseminate key messages on modernising pathology • advise the Department of Health on using funding resources for success • support sharing of good practice in pathology across the NHS • network with the Modernisation Agency and other key stakeholders to re-design pathology services 2 Department of Health. Improvement, Expansion and Reform: the next 3 years. Priorities and Planning Framework 2003-2006. Available at www.dh.gov.uk/planning2003-2006/index.htm. 4 Modernising Pathology Services • work with the diagnostics industry to support the uptake of new technology, new ways of working and effective point of care testing services • review progress after the first year. vii A total of £9.1 million revenue and £54 million capital funding will be available to support this work over the period 2003/04 – 2005/06.3 As part of this funding, in 2005/06 each SHA will receive £100,000 revenue funding for project management to support pathology network development locally. In addition, during 2004/05 and 2005/06 the Department of Health and the Modernisation Agency will fund a programme manager to lead a project on pathology service redesign and modernisation. In 2005/06 the Department of Health will provide £325,000 to roll that work out nationally. viii This document has been developed with the advice of a Working Group, chaired by the Department of Health’s Pathology Modernisation Adviser, Dr Ian Barnes. Its membership is set out at Annex 2. We are very grateful to the group for the time they gave to developing this document. We are also very grateful to all who contributed to developing the consultation paper and to those who responded to it (names at www.dh.gov.uk/pathologymodernisation/commsdoc318june.pdf). ix Any comments or queries on this document should be addressed to: Pathology Modernisation Team Department of Health Area 423 Wellington House 133- 155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG Email: [email protected] 3 Further information on allocations to SHAs and Trusts is at www.dh.gov.uk/nhsfinance.htm 5 Modernising Pathology Services Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 The NHS Plan set out a vision of services designed around patients and supported by a major programme of investment and reform. This document sets out how NHS pathology services in NHS and Foundation Trusts can offer an up-to-date modern service responsive to the needs of patients. Defining pathology 1.2 The term pathology describes clinically-led diagnostic, laboratory and post mortem services based in NHS trusts. This includes direct patient care, interpretation and clinical liaison. The services cover a range of tests on blood and other human materials necessary for diagnosis and monitoring of a wide range of clinical conditions so that the appropriate treatment can be given; and the investigation of the reasons why people may have died and the care of their body if they do so whilst in hospital. Services which pathology departments provide 1.3 NHS pathology services provide a range of important diagnostic support services to help primary, secondary and tertiary care clinicians, and diagnose and treat diseases and other medical conditions. 60%-70% of NHS patients’ diagnoses depend on laboratory tests. While services are currently mainly based in acute trusts, about 40% of work is carried out for patients whose conditions are managed in primary care settings. 1.4 Pathology departments also provide support functions, such as phlebotomy (blood collection), autopsy and mortuary services, as well as direct clinical care to adults and children with conditions such as haemophilia or immune system problems. 7 Modernising Pathology Services 1.5 Finally, NHS pathology services support: • national screening
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Future Role of Medical Graduates in Pathology Services
    The Royal College of Pathologists The future role of medical graduates and consultants in pathology services This document was placed on the Fellows’ and Members’ Area of The Royal College of Pathologists’ website for consultation between 2 March and 23 March 2004. Twelve items of feedback were received, which were considered by the President in preparing this final version. Professor John A Lee Director of Publications This document was archived in Spring 2016 Further copies of this document can be obtained from the College website at www.rcpath.org © The Royal College of Pathologists 2004 INTRODUCTION 1. Defining the role of medical graduates in pathology services has concerned the College almost since its inception. In 1976, Sir Robert Williams, the fourth President, commented: “Next there is the question as to what pathologists in the various disciplines will (or should) be doing in the future, with particular relation perhaps to increased involvement in clinical work; here we come up against the sometimes delicate question of the distribution of duties and responsibilities between medically qualified pathologists, non-medical graduate scientists and laboratory technicians or scientific officers.” 2. The purposes, roles and duties of medical graduates in many other specialties have also been questioned, as non-medical healthcare professionals gradually assumed tasks and responsibilities traditionally associated with General Medical Council (GMC) registration. Writing in 1994, Sir Kenneth Calman, the former Chief Medical Officer (England), considered that doctors were essentially for diagnosis, a process requiring medical judgement: “However, there is one aspect of practice of profound importance which is generally carried out by doctors – that is in making a diagnosis and assessing its consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Rcpath Response to Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine Board Of
    Response from the Royal College of Pathologists to Consultation ECR0195 – Consultation relating to the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine Board of Trus- tees’ recommendation to admit non-medically quali- fied individuals as members The Royal College of Pathologists’ written submission August 2017 For more information please contact: Rachael Liebmann Registrar The Royal College of Pathologists 4th Floor 21 Prescot Street London E1 8BB Phone: 020 7451 6700 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rcpath 1 About the Royal College of Pathologists 1.1 The Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) is a professional membership organisa- tion with charitable status. It is committed to setting and maintaining professional standards and to promoting excellence in the teaching and practice of pathology. Pathology is the sci- ence at the heart of modern medicine and is involved in 70 per cent of all diagnoses made within the National Health Service. The College aims to advance the science and practice of pathology, to provide public education, to promote research in pathology and to disseminate the results. We have over 10,000 members across 19 specialties working in hospital labora- tories, universities and industry worldwide to diagnose, treat and prevent illness. 1.2 The Royal College of Pathologists response reflects comments made by past-Presi- dents of the College during the consultation, which ran from 7th July 2017 until the 18th Au- gust 2017 and collated by the Registrar, Dr Rachael Liebmann. 2 CONTENTS 2.1 This response from the Royal College of Pathologists is in relation to the recent call from the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine Board of Trustees for input to their Trustees’ recommendation to admit non-medically qualified individuals as members.
    [Show full text]
  • The Independent Inquiry Into Histopathology Services
    The Independent Inquiry into Histopathology Services A report for University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust December 2010 PANEL MEMBERS Jane Mishcon was appointed as Chair of the Inquiry. She is a barrister at Hailsham Chambers in London. She has 30 years‘ experience and her main area of practice is clinical negligence. She has chaired nine other independent inquiries. She is ranked as a leading barrister in clinical negligence in both the Legal 500 and Chambers UK Directories. Professor Sir James Underwood is Emeritus Professor of Pathology at the University of Sheffield. He served as President of the Royal College of Pathologists from 2002 to 2005 and latterly was Dean of Sheffield University's Faculty of Medicine. He has had over 30 years‘ experience as a consultant histopathologist in Sheffield. Ken Jarrold CBE is Chair of Dearden Consulting, of the County Durham Economic Partnership and of the Partnership Committee of the Child Exploitation On Line Protection Centre [CEOP] and a member of the CEOP Board. Ken was a manager in the NHS for 36 years including three years as Director of Human Resources and Deputy to the Chief Executive of the NHS in England and 20 years as a Chief Executive of Health Authorities including the County Durham and Tees Valley Strategic Health Authority and the Wessex Regional Health Authority. Dr Margaret Spittle OBE MSc FRCP FRCR AKC is a consultant clinical oncologist and emeritus consultant at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Guys & St Thomas‘ Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. She was Dean of the Royal College of Radiologists and is a Government adviser on radiation safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Streamlining the Search for Stem Cells
    BSBMT NEWS British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation Issue Number 10 - December 2011 INSIDE... STREAMLINING “Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty THE SEARCH FOR pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” (Mr Micawber, David Copperfield) STEM CELLS 2012 will bring the bicentenary of the birth of Charles Dickens, a man who Peter Zarko-Flynn, Ann Green and Bronwen Shaw knew something about debt. Thanks to a perfect storm of financial fecklessness, dishonesty and incompetence, we anticipate frugal times ahead. Graham Jackson sets out some of the resulting challenges to transplant practice and calls for the active involvement of the BSBMT membership in maintaining and developing good practice in the service of our patients. Peter Zarko-Flynn and Ulrike Paulus describe developments in our sister organisations, the Anthony Nolan and the NHSBT while John Snowden and colleagues highlight the effective workings of the Sheffield transplant centre. Elsewhere, challenges in clinical practice are addressed by Ruth Ashbee and Chris Fox. The future of transplantation depends not only on funding, but on talent: Coming through the ranks are Venetia Bigley and Clare Bennett, both winners at the annual BSBMT Scientific meeting as In December 2010 the Department of Health published a report by the UK well as Chris Parrish who provides our Stem Cell Strategic Forum, which was led by NHS Blood and Transplant journal club selection. Life is not all about (NHSBT). The report set out recommendations to save over 200 lives a work - congratulate Venetia on her new baby and also note that The Harvard year by increasing the availability of stem cells for patient transplantation.
    [Show full text]
  • MAT TYPE 001 L578o "Levine, Lawrence W"
    CALL #(BIBLIO) AUTHOR TITLE LOCATION UPDATED(ITEM) MAT TYPE 001 L578o "Levine, Lawrence W" "The opening of the American mind : canons, culture, and history / Lawrence W. Levine" b 001.56 B632 "The Body as a medium of expression : essays based on a course of lectures given at the Institute of Contemporary Arts, London / edited by Jonathan Benthall and Ted Polhemus" b 001.9 Sh26e "Shaw, Eva, 1947-" "Eve of destruction : prophecies, theories, and preparations for the end of the world / by Eva Shaw" b 001.942 C841u "Craig, Roy, 1924-" UFOs : an insider's view of the official quest for evidence / by Roy Craig b 001.942 R159p "Randle, Kevin D., 1949-" Project Blue Book exposed / Kevin D. Randle b 001.942 St97u "Sturrock, Peter A. (Peter Andrew)" The UFO enigma : a new review of the physical evidence / Peter A. Sturrock b 001.942 Uf7 The UFO phenomenon / by the editors of Time- Life Books b 001.944 M191m "Mackal, Roy P" The monsters of Loch Ness / Roy P. Mackal b 001.944 M541s "Meredith, Dennis L" Search at Loch Ness : the expedition of the New York times and the Academy of Applied Science / Dennis L. Meredith b 001.96 L891s "Lorie, Peter" Superstitions / Peter Lorie b 004 P587c "Pickover, Clifford A" Computers and the imagination : visual adventures beyond the edge / Clifford A. Pickover b 004.16 R227 2001 Reader's Digest the new beginner's guide to home computing b 004.1675 Ip1b3 2013 "Baig, Edward C" iPad for dummies / by Edward C. Baig and Bob Dr. Mac LeVitus b 004.1675 Ip2i 2012 "iPhone for seniors : quickly start working with the user-friendly
    [Show full text]
  • 71567 Uni Annual Report 2003
    The University of Sheffield Annual Report 2002/03 ANNUAL REPORT 2002/03 CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD 1 Contents Chairman’s Foreword Chairman's Foreword 1 Higher education in the United year running it has been able to Kingdom continues to be undertake a major programme of Vice-Chancellor’s Introduction 2 characterised by rapid change and academic staff recruitment in areas of Financial Summary 4 by an increasingly competitive and strategic importance to the institution. evolving global market. The key Development of the estate has Investing in the Future 6 issues facing universities in the 21st progressed strongly, with expenditure century have been addressed by the of £42 million on buildings and The Dividend of Research 8 Government in its White Paper, ‘The equipment this year, principally for new Teaching and Learning210 Future of Higher Education’, and by research facilities. This substantial the Higher Education Funding investment in human and physical Widening Participation 12 Council for England in its Strategic resources will ensure that the University Enterprise and Innovation 14 Plan for 2003-08, which has been continues to be a leading player on the developed within the broad policy world stage. Preparing for Employment 16 framework of the White Paper. The Council of the University has In Partnership with Industry and Commerce 18 Widespread consultation on these two maintained its close involvement in documents has taken place in the strategic decision-making and its Part of the Region 20 University, and the institution has also members have taken a keen and developed its Corporate Plan for the supportive interest in the excellent work The International Dimension 22 period 2003/04 to 2007/08.
    [Show full text]
  • National Health Service Litigation Authority Report and Accounts 2006
    The National Health Service Litigation Authority Report and Accounts 2006 HC 1179 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The NHS Litigation Authority is a Special Health Authority, responsible for handling negligence claims made against NHS bodies. When we were first created in 1995 our main functions were to administer schemes under which NHS bodies could pool their clinical negligence liabilities and to promote high standards of risk management in the NHS. Since then, our work has expanded to include schemes and risk management standards for non-clinical liabilities, the provision of an information service for the NHS on human rights case-law, dispute resolution between primary care practitioners and their local Primary Care Trusts, and advice and assistance to NHS bodies when handling equal pay litigation. Our aims and objectives are set out in our current Framework Document: “The Secretary of State’s overall aims for the Authority in administering the schemes are to promote the highest possible standards of patient care and to minimise the suffering resulting from any adverse incidents which do nevertheless occur. In particular, the Authority will contribute to these aims by its efficient, effective and impartial administration of the schemes, and by advising the Secretary of State on any changes that may be needed in the light of experience in running the schemes and of changing circumstances.” In pursuit of this overriding aim, we seek to: “ … maximise the resources available for patient care, by defending unjustified actions robustly, settling justified
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Monday, 2Nd November 2020 1 I Understand, and Mary Will Now Ask You to Affirm
    The Infected Blood Inquiry 2 November 2020 1 Monday, 2nd November 2020 1 I understand, and Mary will now ask you to affirm. 2 (10.00 am) 2 THE WITNESS: I don't mind doing it. What do I do? 3 SIR BRIAN LANGSTAFF: Just before we start this morning, 3 FRANCIS ERIC PRESTON (affirmed) 4 a number of you may have been wondering what the 4 Examined by MS RICHARDS 5 Inquiry's position will be following the 5 MS RICHARDS: Professor Preston, I'm going to be asking 6 Prime Minister's statement over the weekend that he 6 you some questions, and from time to time I'll be 7 proposes to put proposals before Parliament on 7 referring to some documents. You've got documents 8 Wednesday. I'll make a statement about this saying 8 I think with you in paper form, and when I refer to 9 what we propose to do in the light of current 9 documents, your wife is going to find the paper copy 10 knowledge at the close of proceedings today. 10 and provide it to you. Okay? 11 MS RICHARDS: So this morning, sir, we have 11 A. Okay, yes. 12 Professor Preston. Are you able to hear me, 12 Q. So I am just going to start with a few questions about 13 Professor Preston? 13 your career. 14 THE WITNESS: Yes, do I need to put a mask on? 14 After you qualified as a doctor, I understand that 15 MS RICHARDS: You don't. 15 you worked in the Royal Army Medical Corps for 16 SIR BRIAN LANGSTAFF: You don't.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Division of the International Academy of Pathology
    The British Division of the International Academy of Pathology www.bdiap.org JANUARY 2012 BDIAP PRESIDENT PROFESSOR NEIL A SHEPHERD Inside this Issue 2011 has been a special year for the President’s Column: 1-3 BDIAP. It has been our 50th Anniver- sary. The Division was initiated back Message from the IAP in 1961 by Dr George Cunningham. President 3-5 His profound influence on the Soci- Cunningham and ety, in its early days, is, of course, President’s Medals 6 celebrated in the naming of a BDIAP Medal, acknowledging those who History of the BDIAP make a substantial contribution to the Prof. Chris Elston 7-8 BDIAP. This year, as seen elsewhere in this Newsletter, the Cunningham Histopathology - Past, Medal was awarded to Ms Elizabeth Present and Future Whelan, who has made such a huge Prof. Michael Wells 9-14 contribution, over many years, to that very important organ of the BDIAP, Professional Challenges for Pathologists, Prof. Sir its journal Histopathology. James Underwood 15-16 Through the years there has been a The Future of Pathology The Next 50 Years, procession of high profile Presidents Prof. Peter Furness 17-23 of the BDIAP. One sneak at the Presi- dential chain of office (and I do, quite often) identifies the calibre of these th BDIAP Sponsored Presidents, which humbles me a lot. As I said on the day of the 50 Anni- Education, Dr Udovicic- versary celebration, it reads like a ―Who‘s who‖ and it makes me feel a bit Gagula & Prof. Andrew like a ―Who‘s he?‖.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathology 2025:2025: Imaginingimagining Thethe Futurefuture
    COVER STORY PathologyPathology 2025:2025: ImaginingImagining thethe futurefuture Never has medicine been as Dr Puay Hoon Tan technological advances and be fully involved in and direct new developments, challenging as it is in the 21st Singapore since it is only appropriate that century; and never have the pathologists be the ones to control the opportunities been so great. How will the role of pathology use of novel technology in our discipline to Pathology, as the very foundation of Q. change over the next two decades? improve patient care. medicine, is at the forefront of the revolution and new diagnostic tools A. In many institutions with a research Q. What is your wishlist for pathology and knowledge are taking arm, anatomical pathologists are already over the next 20 years? pathologists into broader roles of serving as the bridge between basic research and correlating diagnoses science and clinical medicine, and are A. I hope for sufficient pathologists to for clinicians. therefore poised to become effective perform the closely integrated duties of leaders in the research arena. I believe diagnostic service, teaching and research. Yet, despite the challenges and pathology will be increasingly called upon Pathology is the foundation of medicine, opportunities, there remains a to take a leadership or at least a and is by nature an academic discipline. It shortage of pathologists which adds prominent supportive role in research in is sad that pathologists have been to the pressures to this crucial the coming years. sometimes relegated to a less important branch of medicine. So, what does It is hard to clearly imagine what role in the medical profession.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2003
    TheThe AssociationAssociation ofof ClinicalClinical BiochemistsBiochemists AnnualAnnual ReportReport && AccountsAccounts 20032003 Contents The Association of Clinical Biochemists Annual Report and Accounts: Year Ending 31 December 2002 Introduction 2 Association Awards 4 Education Committee 6 Publications Committee 7 Scientific Committee 10 Trainees Committee 12 Workforce Advisory Committee 13 Federation of Clinical Scientists 14 National Meetings Committee 16 Corporate Members Group 17 European Matters 18 Regional Committees 19 Treasurer’s Report 21 Accounts – Report and Financial Statements 22 Accounts – Benevolent Fund 27 Accounts – C P Stewart Memorial Fund 28 President: Professor A Shenkin BSc MB ChB PhD FRCPath Department of Clinical Chemistry Royal Liverpool University Hospital Duncan Building Liverpool L69 3GA Chairman: Mr M J Hallworth MA MSc MCB FRCPath Department of Clinical Biochemistry Royal Shrewsbury Hospital Mytton Oak Road, Shrewsbury SY3 8XQ Honorary Secretary: Dr S J Rainbow BSc PhD FRCPath Department of Clinical Biochemistry Northwick Park Hospital Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ Administrative Office: Association of Clinical Biochemists 130-132 Tooley Street London SE1 2TU Telephone: 0207 403 8001 Fax: 0207 403 8006 Email: [email protected] Registered Office: Association of Clinical Biochemists 130-132 Tooley Street, London SE1 2TU © Association of Clinical Biochemists, 2003 Edited by Anne Pollock, Glasgow. Photography: Jonathan Berg, Birmingham Additional photographs from: Stephen Halloran, Guildford, Gwyn McCreanor, Kettering and Geoff Lester, Reading 1 Introduction The 49th year of the Association’s activities, 2002, in many respects reflected a typical year for the ACB – steady progress on a whole range of established issues and projects, interspersed with frenzied activity on new initiatives. Inevitably, some of the latter will prove to be of immense importance for our subject and those who practise it, while others will fade into the sand, and will be revealed by the all-seeing retrospectoscope to have been a waste of time and effort.
    [Show full text]
  • International Academy of Pathology Limited
    Australasian Division of the International Academy of Pathology Limited Newsletters - 2007 Number Two Contents Message from the President 32nd ASM Poster Awards Notes from the Editor Invited visitors to the June 2007 ASM Report on the visit of Prof. Sir James Underwood to Brisbane, June 6-9, 2007 Annual subscription Committee Members The USCAP Virtual Slide Box Message from the President Brett Delahunt President from 2007-2009 Report on the 32nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australasian Division of the International Academy of Pathology Darling Harbour, Sydney, June 1- John Pedersen completed his two year term as President of the Australasian Division, IAP, with the organisation of the successful 32nd Annual Scientific Me As has become a tradition, the first day of the ASM was dedicated to the meetings of the Division's specialty companion clubs. This year fourteen clubs met in ses 7pm and the breadth of pathology on offer was a tribute to the dedication of the program convenors. The popular grey-green master class for trainees was continue present enjoyed the presentation by Professor Sir James Underwood, Professor Emeritus, Sheffield University and past President of the Royal College of Patholog Underwood also gave the Keynote Lecture of the day which focused on the nature of the diagnostic process and the causes of errors in pathology reporting. As an innovation to this year's ASM, two additional master classes for trainees were added to the programme on Saturday and Sunday mornings prior to the comm long theme sessions. On Saturday, Associate Professor David Challis presented a practical approach to the interpretation of renal biopsies, while on Sunday Profes gave a comprehensive account on the pathology of melanoma.
    [Show full text]