The Asymmetric Cell Division Machinery in the Spiral-Cleaving Egg and Embryo of the Marine Annelid Platynereis Dumerilii Aron B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Asymmetric Cell Division Machinery in the Spiral-Cleaving Egg and Embryo of the Marine Annelid Platynereis Dumerilii Aron B Nakama et al. BMC Developmental Biology (2017) 17:16 DOI 10.1186/s12861-017-0158-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The asymmetric cell division machinery in the spiral-cleaving egg and embryo of the marine annelid Platynereis dumerilii Aron B. Nakama1, Hsien-Chao Chou1,2 and Stephan Q. Schneider1* Abstract Background: Over one third of all animal phyla utilize a mode of early embryogenesis called ‘spiral cleavage’ to divide the fertilized egg into embryonic cells with different cell fates. This mode is characterized by a series of invariant, stereotypic, asymmetric cell divisions (ACDs) that generates cells of different size and defined position within the early embryo. Astonishingly, very little is known about the underlying molecular machinery to orchestrate these ACDs in spiral-cleaving embryos. Here we identify, for the first time, cohorts of factors that may contribute to early embryonic ACDs in a spiralian embryo. Results: To do so we analyzed stage-specific transcriptome data in eggs and early embryos of the spiralian annelid Platynereis dumerilii for the expression of over 50 candidate genes that are involved in (1) establishing cortical domains such as the partitioning defective (par) genes, (2) directing spindle orientation, (3) conveying polarity cues including crumbs and scribble, and (4) maintaining cell-cell adhesion between embryonic cells. In general, each of these cohorts of genes are co-expressed exhibiting high levels of transcripts in the oocyte and fertilized single-celled embryo, with progressively lower levels at later stages. Interestingly, a small number of key factors within each ACD module show different expression profiles with increased early zygotic expression suggesting distinct regulatory functions. In addition, our analysis discovered several highly co-expressed genes that have been associated with specialized neural cell-cell recognition functions in the nervous system. The high maternal contribution of these ‘neural’ adhesion complexes indicates novel general adhesion functions during early embryogenesis. Conclusions: Spiralian embryos are champions of ACD generating embryonic cells of different size with astonishing accuracy. Our results suggest that the molecular machinery for ACD is already stored as maternal transcripts in the oocyte. Thus, the spiralian egg can be viewed as a totipotent yet highly specialized cell that evolved to execute fast and precise ACDs during spiral cleaving stages. Our survey identifies cohorts of factors in P. dumerilii that are candidates for these molecular mechanisms and their regulation, and sets the stage for a functional dissection of ACD in a spiral-cleaving embryo. Keywords: Maternal contribution, Spiral cleavage, Cortical domains, PAR genes, Spindle orientation, Cell polarity, Crumbs complex, Planar cell polarity, Neural adhesion complexes, Transcriptional profiles * Correspondence: [email protected] 1Department of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, 503 Science Hall II, Ames, IA 50011, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Nakama et al. BMC Developmental Biology (2017) 17:16 Page 2 of 22 Background [12]. Although cellular aspects of ACD, including the Asymmetric cell division (ACD) is the fundamental role of the cytoskeleton, have been studied in annelid process that subdivides a mother cell into two daughter embryos by the Shimizu and Weisblat laboratories [13– cells that exhibit differences in cell fate, cell size, and/or 17], surprisingly little is known about the molecular ma- cell position. As such, it constitutes a central developmen- chinery that executes ACD in spiralians, even though tal mechanism essential for cell lineage diversification dur- these embryos exhibit some of the most readily observ- ing early embryogenesis, formation of organs, and division able and extreme cell size asymmetries in all metazoans. of stem cells (reviewed in [1–4]). Much of our current Developing P. dumerilii embryos produce the typical knowledge about ACD has been established over the last hallmarks of spiral cleavage. Every cell division, beginning two decades exploiting two genetic invertebrate model or- with the one-celled zygote, is asymmetric. ACD continues ganisms, the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans (C. through early cleavage stages and beyond generating elegans) and the arthropod fruit fly Drosophila melanoga- daughter cells of different sizes [18, 19]. For example, the ster (Drosophila). In both systems, a detailed understand- first mitotic division always generates the smaller AB and ing of embryonic and postembryonic processes on a the larger CD blastomeres [10, 19, 20]. This first division cellular level, and the use of forward and reverse genetic defines the D/V axis. As in other spiral cleaving embryos, tools, has led to the identification of mostly conserved the developmental program in P. dumerilii is recognizable cohorts of genes. These genes execute ACDs in various through the pattern of cell divisions based upon the developmental contexts including the formation of diver- stereotypic orientation of the mitotic spindle. Starting with sified cell lineages within embryos, the nervous system, the 3rd cell division the alternating mitotic spindles are sensory organs, wing development, and epithelia. oriented either clockwise or counter clockwise, with re- The significance of ACD becomes unmistakable when spect to the animal pole, generating animal-pole and considering the earliest steps during metazoan embryo- vegetal-pole sister cell pairs [10, 18–20]. Thus, the embry- genesis. Mitotic cell divisions subdivide the fertilized egg onic cells of differing size and position are assembled in a into embryonic cells with different fates and defined po- stereotypic and invariant pattern in each stage. sitions that foreshadow the three emerging body axes of The generation of the spiral cleavage pattern along the the embryo. This process has been studied on the molecu- animal-vegetal axis requires an asymmetric cue, cellular lar level extensively, in C. elegans, whereallthreebodyaxes polarization, and/or some initial symmetry-breaking event anterior/posterior (A/P), dorsal/ventral (D/V), and right/left in oocyte or zygote that leads to subsequent ACDs. In (R/L) are determined by the third round of embryonic cell some organisms, the unfertilized egg/oocyte is polarized divisions [2, 5]. Complementary studies in Drosophila,and as observed in the intrinsically well-defined polarity axes in various vertebrate models including frog and mouse em- within the Drosophila egg [21]. In other organisms, early bryos, have identified similarities on the molecular level [4, asymmetric cues are introduced through fertilization e.g. 6, 7]. However, comparisons are complicated by the derived the sperm entry point defines the future A/P axis in C. nature of the molecular machinery for ACD in C. elegans elegans [22, 23], and the D/V axis in Xenopus laevis [24]. and/or the divergence of early developmental processes Currently, it is not known if internal polarity of the oocyte between metazoan models. Although studies on ACD in exists in P. dumerilii. However, dramatic reorganization of various new models are emerging [8, 9], there are still large the egg upon sperm contact, termed ooplasmic segrega- gaps in our understanding of the nature, utilization, conser- tion, has been described [18, 19]. vation, and evolution of the ACD mechanisms; especially in After sperm contacts the egg, cortical streaming pushes regards to establishing cellular asymmetries and cell yolk granules and lipid droplets towards the future vegetal lineages during metazoan embryogenesis. pole. At the same time, an area of clear cytoplasm forms at Here we introduce the marine annelid Platynereis the future animal pole, harboring the oocyte nucleus. About dumerilii as a model to study ACD in a spiral-cleaving one-hour post fertilization (hpf), the oocyte nucleus com- embryo [10]. Spiral cleavage is a widespread develop- pletes meiotic cell divisions, via two extreme ACDs, that mental mode among approximately one-third of all ani- lead to the extrusion of two polar bodies. The site of polar mal phyla including mollusks (snails and clams), and body extrusion defines the animal pole and determines the annelids (leeches and earthworms) [11]. This mode is animal/vegetal (A/V) axis [10, 19] (Fig. 1). Subsequently, characterized by a series of asymmetric cell divisions the male pronucleus migrates towards the female pro- that subdivide the fertilized egg into embryonic cells of nucleus (now located at the animal pole). Pronuclear fusion different size and fates with an invariant, stereotypic and duplication of the male centrioles mark the beginning spiral arrangement. Indeed, early observations of spiral of the first mitotic cell division of the zygote [25]. The mi- cleaving embryos and their cell size asymmetries were totic spindle pole located
Recommended publications
  • Emergence of Embryo Shape During Cleavage Divisions Alex Mcdougall, Janet Chenevert, Benoît Godard, Rémi Dumollard
    Emergence of embryo shape during cleavage divisions Alex Mcdougall, Janet Chenevert, Benoît Godard, Rémi Dumollard To cite this version: Alex Mcdougall, Janet Chenevert, Benoît Godard, Rémi Dumollard. Emergence of embryo shape during cleavage divisions. Evo-Devo: Non-model Species in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2019. hal-02362892 HAL Id: hal-02362892 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02362892 Submitted on 14 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Emergence of embryo shape during cleavage divisions Alex McDougall1, Janet Chenevert1, Benoit G. Godard2 and Remi Dumollard1 1. Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche‐sur‐mer (LBDV), UMR7009, 181 chemin du Lazaret, 06230 Villefranche‐sur‐Mer, France 2. Institute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria Abstract Cells are arranged into species‐specific patterns during early embryogenesis. Such cell division patterns are important since they often reflect the distribution of localized cortical factors from eggs/fertilized eggs to specific cells as well as the emergence of organismal form. However, it has proven difficult to reveal the mechanisms that underlie the emergence of cell positioning patterns that underlie embryonic shape, likely because a system‐level approach is required that integrates cell biological, genetic, developmental and mechanical parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleavage Pattern and Development of Isolated D Blastomeres in Bivalves
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Tsukuba Repository Cleavage pattern and development of isolated D blastomeres in bivalves 著者 Hashimoto Naoki, Kurita Yoshihisa, Murakami Kana, Wada Hiroshi journal or Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: publication title Molecular and Developmental Evolution volume 234 number 1 page range 13-21 year 2015-01 権利 (C) 2014 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 324,1,2015, which has been published in final form at DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.22585.This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. URL http://hdl.handle.net/2241/00123041 doi: 10.1002/jez.b.22585 1. Complete title of paper Cleavage pattern and development of isolated D blastomeres in bivalves 2. Author’s names Naoki Hashimoto1*, Yoshihisa Kurita1, 2, Kana Murakami1, Hiroshi Wada1 3. Institutional affiliations 1 Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan 2 Fishery Research Laboratory, Kyushu University, Fukutsu 811-3304, Japan 4. Total number of text and figures One manuscript file, two tables, six figure files and two movie files. 5. Abbreviated title Cleavage and development of isolated blastomeres 6. Correspondence to: Name: Naoki Hashimoto. Address: Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai 1-1-1, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan E-mail: [email protected] Tel & Fax: +08-29-4671 7. Supporting grant information Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta-Notch Signaling: the Long and the Short of a Neuron’S Influence on Progenitor Fates
    Journal of Developmental Biology Review Delta-Notch Signaling: The Long and the Short of a Neuron’s Influence on Progenitor Fates Rachel Moore 1,* and Paula Alexandre 2,* 1 Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, UK 2 Developmental Biology and Cancer, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.M.); [email protected] (P.A.) Received: 18 February 2020; Accepted: 24 March 2020; Published: 26 March 2020 Abstract: Maintenance of the neural progenitor pool during embryonic development is essential to promote growth of the central nervous system (CNS). The CNS is initially formed by tightly compacted proliferative neuroepithelial cells that later acquire radial glial characteristics and continue to divide at the ventricular (apical) and pial (basal) surface of the neuroepithelium to generate neurons. While neural progenitors such as neuroepithelial cells and apical radial glia form strong connections with their neighbours at the apical and basal surfaces of the neuroepithelium, neurons usually form the mantle layer at the basal surface. This review will discuss the existing evidence that supports a role for neurons, from early stages of differentiation, in promoting progenitor cell fates in the vertebrates CNS, maintaining tissue homeostasis and regulating spatiotemporal patterning of neuronal differentiation through Delta-Notch signalling. Keywords: neuron; neurogenesis; neuronal apical detachment; asymmetric division; notch; delta; long and short range lateral inhibition 1. Introduction During the development of the central nervous system (CNS), neurons derive from neural progenitors and the Delta-Notch signaling pathway plays a major role in these cell fate decisions [1–4].
    [Show full text]
  • Asymmetric Inheritance of Cell Fate Determinants: Focus on RNA
    non-coding RNA Review Asymmetric Inheritance of Cell Fate Determinants: Focus on RNA Yelyzaveta Shlyakhtina y, Katherine L. Moran y and Maximiliano M. Portal * Cell Plasticity & Epigenetics Lab, Cancer Research UK–Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, SK10 4TG Manchester, UK; [email protected] (Y.S.); [email protected] (K.L.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 26 March 2019; Accepted: 6 May 2019; Published: 9 May 2019 Abstract: During the last decade, and mainly primed by major developments in high-throughput sequencing technologies, the catalogue of RNA molecules harbouring regulatory functions has increased at a steady pace. Current evidence indicates that hundreds of mammalian RNAs have regulatory roles at several levels, including transcription, translation/post-translation, chromatin structure, and nuclear architecture, thus suggesting that RNA molecules are indeed mighty controllers in the flow of biological information. Therefore, it is logical to suggest that there must exist a series of molecular systems that safeguard the faithful inheritance of RNA content throughout cell division and that those mechanisms must be tightly controlled to ensure the successful segregation of key molecules to the progeny. Interestingly, whilst a handful of integral components of mammalian cells seem to follow a general pattern of asymmetric inheritance throughout division, the fate of RNA molecules largely remains a mystery. Herein, we will discuss current concepts of asymmetric inheritance in a wide range of systems, including prions, proteins, and finally RNA molecules, to assess overall the biological impact of RNA inheritance in cellular plasticity and evolutionary fitness.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles and Mechanisms of Asymmetric Cell Division Bharath Sunchu and Clemens Cabernard*
    © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Development (2020) 147, dev167650. doi:10.1242/dev.167650 REVIEW Principles and mechanisms of asymmetric cell division Bharath Sunchu and Clemens Cabernard* ABSTRACT highlight studies that have revealed asymmetric segregation of Asymmetric cell division (ACD) is an evolutionarily conserved macromolecules or organelles and review the documented or mechanism used by prokaryotes and eukaryotes alike to control potential influence of these events on cell fate decisions in yeast and cell fate and generate cell diversity. A detailed mechanistic metazoans. We also discuss how asymmetries in the cytoskeleton, understanding of ACD is therefore necessary to understand cell spindle, centromeres and histones can contribute to ACD. fate decisions in health and disease. ACD can be manifested in the biased segregation of macromolecules, the differential partitioning of Polarized localization and biased inheritance of RNAs and cell organelles, or differences in sibling cell size or shape. These proteins events are usually preceded by and influenced by symmetry breaking Cell fate decisions can be induced through asymmetric partitioning events and cell polarization. In this Review, we focus predominantly of molecular determinants such as RNA species or proteins. For on cell intrinsic mechanisms and their contribution to cell polarization, example, mRNAs that are segregated into one sibling cell can ACD and binary cell fate decisions. We discuss examples of polarized quickly produce proteins to elicit a specific cell behavior. systems and detail how polarization is established and, whenever Alternatively, regulatory RNA species or proteins can affect gene possible, how it contributes to ACD. Established and emerging expression, protein localization and function.
    [Show full text]
  • Asymmetric Cell Division Regulates the Transcriptional Balance Controlling Memory Fate Decisions in T Cells
    Letter to the Editor Page 1 of 2 Asymmetric cell division regulates the transcriptional balance controlling memory fate decisions in T cells Alexandre Morrot1,2 1Department of Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Correspondence to: Dr. Alexandre Morrot. Department of Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), CCS - Sala D1-035, Av. Carlos C hagas F ilho, CEP 21.941-902, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Email: morrot@ micro.ufrj.br. Submitted Jan 14, 2017. Accepted for publication Jan 17, 2017. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.02.29 View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.02.29 The asymmetric cell division is an evolutionary acquisition Asymmetric cell division balances self-renewal proliferation strategy of multicellular organisms that enable the of progenitor cells with cell cycle exit and differentiation of pluripotent cells to produce two daughter cells with dividing daughter cells (3). distinct cellular fates. This characteristic is responsible for A number of different genes have been demonstrated to originating all the embryonic leaflets and tissues of the play a role in the pluripotency of stem cells, such as Bmi-1, Metazoan Phyla in which stem cells divide asymmetrically Wnt and Notch. These genes are critical to the self-renew to give rise to two different daughter cells, one preserving capacity of dividing progenitor stem cells. Their abnormal the original stem cell pluripotency (self-renewal) and the expression during stem cell differentiation leads to an other daughter, committed to a further differentiation impairment of asymmetric cell division in dividing cells that program, into specialized cell types with non-stem cell is thought to play a role in the tumorigenic transformation fate (1).
    [Show full text]
  • And Outs(Ide) of Asymmetric Stem Cell Division
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect The ins(ide) and outs(ide) of asymmetric stem cell division 1,2 1,3 Cuie Chen , Jaclyn M Fingerhut and 1,2,3,4 Yukiko M Yamashita Many adult stem cells divide asymmetrically, generating one self-renewal and differentiation can be achieved through stem cell (self-renewal) and one differentiating cell. Balancing asymmetric stem cell division. self-renewal and differentiation is critical for sustaining tissue homeostasis throughout the life of an organism. Failure to Asymmetric stem cell division is generally dictated by execute asymmetric stem cell division can have profound unequally distributed cell-extrinsic and/or cell-intrinsic impacts on tissue homeostasis, resulting in tissue degeneration fate determinants (Figure 1). In either case, spindle or hyperplasia/tumorigenic overgrowth. Recent studies have orientation plays a key role in achieving an asymmetric expanded our understanding of both the extracellular and outcome after stem cell division by aligning the cell intracellular mechanisms that regulate, reinforce and ensure an division plane with pre-established cell-extrinsic or asymmetric outcome following stem cell division. In this review, cell-intrinsic asymmetries (Figure 1). The core machinery we discuss newly discovered aspects of asymmetric stem cell for orienting the spindle is evolutionarily conserved, and division that, in concert with well-established mechanisms, decades of study have provided critical insights into the contribute to balancing self-renewal and differentiation. molecular mechanisms of spindle orientation [1]. Al- though the detailed mechanisms regulating asymmetric Addresses 1 cell division and spindle orientation have been elucidated Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA largely using model organisms such as yeast, worm and 2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, flies, it has become clear that mammalian stem cells also MI 48109, USA 3 utilize similar mechanisms [2,3 ].
    [Show full text]
  • Helobdella Robusta Sp.Nov., and Comparison with Helobdella Triserialis on the Basis of Morphology, Embryology, and Experimental Breeding
    Description of the Californian leech Helobdella robusta sp.nov., and comparison with Helobdella triserialis on the basis of morphology, embryology, and experimental breeding MARTYSHANKLAND Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 021 15, U.S. A. SHIRLEYT. BISSEN Department of Biology, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO 63121, U.S.A. AND DAVIDA. WEISBLAT Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S. A. Received August 2, 199 1 Accepted December 18, 199 1 SHANKLAND,M., BISSEN,S. T., and WEISBLAT,D. A. 1992. Description of the Californian leech Helobdella robusta sp. nov., and comparison with Helobdella triserialis on the basis of morphology, embryology, and experimental breeding. Can. J. Zool. 70: 1258 - 1263. This paper describes the leech Helobdella robusta, which was collected from the Sacramento delta of California. This new species is generally similar to another species found in California, Helobdella triserialis, and the two were compared in detail. In the adult, we observed reliable differences in the relative dimensions of the body, the size of the dorsal papillae, the pattern of cutaneous pigmentation, and the structure of the gut. In the embryo, we observed differences in the appearance of the yolk platelets and the size of the adhesive gland. We also observed differences in the rate of embryonic development. All of these differences persist in breeding populations that have been maintained in the laboratory over many generations. Experimental studies indicate that H. robusta and H. triserialis have little or no proclivity for interbreeding, supporting their distinction as separate species.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermediate Filament Genes As Differentiation Markers in the Leech Helobdella
    Dev Genes Evol (2011) 221:225–240 DOI 10.1007/s00427-011-0375-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Intermediate filament genes as differentiation markers in the leech Helobdella Dian-Han Kuo & David A. Weisblat Received: 12 August 2011 /Accepted: 8 September 2011 /Published online: 22 September 2011 # Springer-Verlag 2011 Abstract The intermediate filament (IF) cytoskeleton is a evolutionary changes in the cell or tissue specificity of CIFs general feature of differentiated cells. Its molecular compo- have occurred among leeches. Hence, CIFs are not suitable nents, IF proteins, constitute a large family including the for identifying cell or tissue homology except among very evolutionarily conserved nuclear lamins and the more closely related species, but they are nevertheless useful diverse collection of cytoplasmic intermediate filament species-specific differentiation markers. (CIF) proteins. In vertebrates, genes encoding CIFs exhibit cell/tissue type-specific expression profiles and are thus Keywords Cell differentiation . Intermediate filament . useful as differentiation markers. The expression of Gene expression pattern . Helobdella . Leech . Annelid invertebrate CIFs, however, is not well documented. Here, we report a whole-genome survey of IF genes and their developmental expression patterns in the leech Helobdella, Introduction a lophotrochozoan model for developmental biology re- search. We found that, as in vertebrates, each of the leech The intermediate filament (IF) cytoskeleton is a structural CIF genes is expressed in a specific set of cell/tissue types. component that provides mechanical support for the cell. In This allows us to detect earliest points of differentiation for keeping with the large variety of cellular phenotypes, the IF multiple cell types in leech development and to use CIFs as cytoskeleton exhibits a high level of structural diversity and molecular markers for studying cell fate specification in is assembled from a much larger family of proteins leech embryos.
    [Show full text]
  • Asymmetric Cell Division Promotes Therapeutic Resistance in Glioblastoma Stem Cells
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Asymmetric cell division promotes therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma stem cells Masahiro Hitomi,1,2,3 Anastasia P. Chumakova,1,2 Daniel J. Silver,1,2,3,4 Arnon M. Knudsen,5,6 W. Dean Pontius,3 Stephanie Murphy,1,2 Neha Anand,1,2 Bjarne W. Kristensen,5,6 and Justin D. Lathia1,2,3,4,7 1Cancer Impact Area, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 2Department of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 3Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 4Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 5Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. 6Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 7Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Asymmetric cell division (ACD) enables the maintenance of a stem cell population while simultaneously generating differentiated progeny. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) undergo multiple modes of cell division during tumor expansion and in response to therapy, yet the functional consequences of these division modes remain to be determined. Using a fluorescent reporter for cell surface receptor distribution during mitosis, we found that ACD generated a daughter cell with enhanced therapeutic resistance and increased coenrichment of EGFR and neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) from a glioblastoma CSC. Stimulation of both receptors antagonized differentiation induction and promoted self-renewal capacity. p75NTR knockdown enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of EGFR inhibition, indicating that coinheritance of p75NTR and EGFR promotes resistance to EGFR inhibition through a redundant mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of the Caenorhabditis Elegans Germline Stem Cell System
    | WORMBOOK CELL FATE, SIGNALING, AND DEVELOPMENT Biology of the Caenorhabditis elegans Germline Stem Cell System E. Jane Albert Hubbard*,1 and Tim Schedl†,1 *Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, Departments of Cell Biology and Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, † New York 10016 and Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 ORCID IDs: 0000-0001-5893-7232 (E.J.A.H.); 0000-0003-2148-2996 (T.S.) ABSTRACT Stem cell systems regulate tissue development and maintenance. The germline stem cell system is essential for animal reproduction, controlling both the timing and number of progeny through its influence on gamete production. In this review, we first draw general comparisons to stem cell systems in other organisms, and then present our current understanding of the germline stem cell system in Caenorhabditis elegans. In contrast to stereotypic somatic development and cell number stasis of adult somatic cells in C. elegans, the germline stem cell system has a variable division pattern, and the system differs between larval development, early adult peak reproduction and age-related decline. We discuss the cell and developmental biology of the stem cell system and the Notch regulated genetic network that controls the key decision between the stem cell fate and meiotic development, as it occurs under optimal laboratory conditions in adult and larval stages. We then discuss alterations of the stem cell system in response to environ- mental perturbations and aging. A recurring distinction is between processes that control stem cell fate and those that control cell cycle regulation. C. elegans is a powerful model for understanding germline stem cells and stem cell biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Inductive Asymmetric Cell Division the WRM Leads the Way
    Mini-ReVIEW Mini-ReVIEW Worm 2:4, e26276; October/November/December 2013; © 2013 Landes Bioscience Inductive asymmetric cell division The WRM leads the way Takao Ishidate1,†, Soyoung Kim1,†, Craig Mello1,*, and Masaki Shirayama1,* 1R NA Therapeutics Institute; Program in Molecular Medicine; University of Massachusetts Medical School; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Worcester, MA USA; †These authors contributed equally to this work. In the four-cell embryo, a cell–cell interaction between EMS and C. elegans, with its invariant cell lineage, provides its posterior sister cell, P2, induces EMS to reorient its mitotic a powerful model system in which to study signaling- spindle 90° from an initially left-right (l-r) to a final anterior- dependent asymmetric cell division. The C. elegans β-catenin- posterior (a-p) orientation. After division, the anterior descendant related protein, WRM-1, specifies endoderm at the 4-cell stage during the first cell signaling-induced asymmetric cell division of EMS called MS produces primarily mesoderm, while the 3-6 of embryogenesis. During this interaction, Wnt signaling posterior descendant called E produces the entire endoderm. and the cell cycle regulator CDK-1 act together to induce In the absence of P2/EMS signaling, endoderm is not specified, the asymmetric cortical release of WRM-1 at prophase of the and EMS fails to rotate its mitotic spindle, dividing instead EMS cell cycle. Genetic studies suggest that release of WRM-1 with a default l-r orientation and producing two equivalent unmasks a cortical site that drives EMS spindle rotation onto cells with MS-like cell fates. Over the last decade, a large body the polarized axis of the cell, simultaneously making WRM-1 of work has begun to uncover a remarkably complex multi- available for nuclear translocation, and downstream signaling branched and interacting group of signal-transduction pathways, to specify endoderm.
    [Show full text]