DOCSLIB.ORG

Using 21St Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations (2017)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/24635 SHARE Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations (2017) DETAILS 200 pages | 8.5 x 11 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-45348-6 | DOI 10.17226/24635 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Committee on Incorporating 21st Century Science into Risk-Based Evaluations; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine FIND RELATED TITLES SUGGESTED CITATION National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2017. Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24635. Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations USING 21ST CENTURY SCIENCE TO IMPROVE RISK-RELATED EVALUATIONS Committee on Incorporating 21st Century Science into Risk-Based Evaluations Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology Division on Earth and Life Studies A Report of Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 This activity was supported by Contract EP-C-14-005, TO#0002 between the National Academy of Sciences and the US Environmental Protection Agency. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project. Additional copies of this publication are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-45348-6 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-45348-8 Digital Object Identifier: 10.17226/24635 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017930534 Copyright 2017 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24635. Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. C.D. Mote, Jr., is president. The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president. The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve com- plex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine. Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.national-academies. org. Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations Reports document the evidence-based consensus of an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and committee deliberations. Reports are peer reviewed and are approved by the National Academies of Sci- ences, Engineering, and Medicine. Proceedings chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other convening event. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and have not been endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies of Sciences, En- gineering, and Medicine. For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit national academies.org/whatwedo. Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations COMMITTEE ON INCORPORATING 21ST CENTURY SCIENCE INTO RISK-BASED EVALUATIONS Members JONATHAN M. SAMET (Chair), University of Southern California, Los Angeles MELVIN E. ANDERSEN, ScitoVation, Research Triangle Park, NC JON A. ARNOT, ARC Arnot Research & Consulting, Toronto, ON ESTEBAN BURCHARD, University of California, San Francisco GEORGE P. DASTON, Procter & Gamble, Mason, OH DAVID B. DUNSON, Duke University, Durham, NC NIGEL GREENE, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA HEATHER B. PATISAUL, North Carolina State University, Raleigh KRISTI PULLEN FEDINICK, Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC BEATE R. RITZ, University of California, Los Angeles IVAN RUSYN, Texas A&M University, College Station ROBERT L. TANGUAY, Oregon State University, Corvallis JUSTIN G. TEEGUARDEN, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA JAMES M. TIEDJE, Michigan State University, East Lansing PAOLO VINEIS, Imperial College London, UK MICHELLE WILLIAMS, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA FRED WRIGHT, North Carolina State University, Raleigh LAUREN ZEISE, California Environmental Protection Agency, Oakland Staff ELLEN K. MANTUS, Project Director MARILEE SHELTON-DAVENPORT, Senior Program Officer NORMAN GROSSBLATT, Senior Editor MIRSADA KARALIC-LONCAREVIC, Manager, Technical Information Center RADIAH ROSE-CRAWFORD, Manager, Editorial Projects IVORY CLARKE, Research Assistant Sponsors US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES v Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations BOARD ON ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND TOXICOLOGY1 Members WILLIAM H. FARLAND (Chair), Colorado State University, Fort Collins PRAVEEN AMAR, Independent Consultant, Lexington, MA RICHARD A. BECKER, American Chemistry Council, Washington, DC E. WILLIAM COLGLAZIER, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC DOMINIC M. DITORO, University of Delaware, Newark DAVID C. DORMAN, North Carolina State University, Raleigh CHARLES T. DRISCOLL, JR., Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY ANNE FAIRBROTHER, Exponent (Retired), Philomath, OR LINDA E. GREER, Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC WILLIAM E. HALPERIN, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark STEVEN P. HAMBURG, Environmental Defense Fund, New York, NY ROBERT A. HIATT, University of California, San Francisco PHILIP K. HOPKE, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY SAMEUL KACEW, University of Ottawa, Ontario H. SCOTT MATTHEWS, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA THOMAS E. MCKONE, University of California, Berkeley ROBERT PERCIASEPE, Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, Arlington, VA MARK A. RATNER, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL JOAN B. ROSE, Michigan State University, East Lansing GINA M. SOLOMON, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento ROBERT M. SUSSMAN, Sussman and Associates, Washington, DC DEBORAH L. SWACKHAMMER, University of Minnesota, St. Paul PETER S. THORNE, University of Iowa, Iowa City JOYCE S. TSUJI, Exponent, Inc., Bellevue, WA Senior Staff JAMES J. REISA, Senior Director ELLEN K. MANTUS, Scholar and Director of Risk Assessment RAYMOND A. WASSEL, Scholar and Director of Environmental Studies SUSAN N.J. MARTEL, Senior Program Officer for Toxicology MIRSADA KARALIC-LONCAREVIC, Manager, Technical Information Center RADIAH ROSE-CRAWFORD, Manager, Editorial Projects 1This study was planned, overseen, and supported by the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. vi Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations OTHER REPORTS OF THE BOARD ON ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND TOXICOLOGY Application of Modern Toxicology Approaches for Predicting Acute Toxicity for Chemical Defense (2015) Review of California’s Risk-Assessment Process for Pesticides (2015) Sustainability Concepts in Decision-Making:
Recommended publications
  • Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs During 2020–2024

    Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs During 2020–2024

    IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs during 2020–2024 Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs during 2020–2024 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Acetaldehyde (CAS No. 75-07-0) ................................................................................................. 3 Acrolein (CAS No. 107-02-8) ....................................................................................................... 4 Acrylamide (CAS No. 79-06-1) .................................................................................................... 5 Acrylonitrile (CAS No. 107-13-1) ................................................................................................ 6 Aflatoxins (CAS No. 1402-68-2) .................................................................................................. 8 Air pollutants and underlying mechanisms for breast cancer ....................................................... 9 Airborne gram-negative bacterial endotoxins ............................................................................. 10 Alachlor (chloroacetanilide herbicide) (CAS No. 15972-60-8) .................................................. 10 Aluminium (CAS No. 7429-90-5) .............................................................................................. 11
  • National Center for Toxicological Research

    National Center for Toxicological Research

    National Center for Toxicological Research Annual Report Research Accomplishments and Plans FY 2015 – FY 2016 Page 0 of 193 Table of Contents Preface – William Slikker, Jr., Ph.D. ................................................................................... 3 NCTR Vision ......................................................................................................................... 7 NCTR Mission ...................................................................................................................... 7 NCTR Strategic Plan ............................................................................................................ 7 NCTR Organizational Structure .......................................................................................... 8 NCTR Location and Facilities .............................................................................................. 9 NCTR Advances Research Through Outreach and Collaboration ................................... 10 NCTR Global Outreach and Training Activities ............................................................... 12 Global Summit on Regulatory Science .................................................................................................12 Training Activities .................................................................................................................................14 NCTR Scientists – Leaders in the Research Community .................................................. 15 Science Advisory Board ...................................................................................................
  • Chemistry and Safety of Acrylamide in Food ADVANCES in EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE and BIOLOGY

    Chemistry and Safety of Acrylamide in Food ADVANCES in EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE and BIOLOGY

    Chemistry and Safety of Acrylamide in Food ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY Editorial Board: NATHAN BACK, State University of New York at Buffalo IRUN R. COHEN, The Weizmann Institute of Science DAVID KRITCHEVSKY, Wistar Institute ABEL LAJTHA, N. S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research RODOLFO PAOLETTI, University of Milan Recent Volumes in this Series Volume 553 BIOMATERIALS: From Molecules to Engineered Tissues Edited by Nesrin Hasirci and Vasif Hasirci Volume 554 PROTECTING INFANTS THROUGH HUMAN MILK: Advancing the Scientific Evidence Edited by Larry K. Pickering, Ardythe L. Morrow, Guillermo M. Ruiz-Palacios, and Richard J. Schanler Volume 555 BREAST FEEEDING: Early Influences on Later Health Edited by Gail Goldberg, Andrew Prentice, Ann Prentice, Suzanne Filteau, and Elsie Widdowson Volume 556 IMMUNOINFORMATICS: Opportunities and Challenges of Bridging Immunology with Computer and Information Sciences Edited by Christian Schoenbach, V. Brusic, and Akihiko Konagaya Volume 557 BRAIN REPAIR Edited by M. Bahr Volume 558 DEFECTS OF SECRETION IN CYSTIC FIBROSIS Edited by Carsten Schultz Volume 559 CELL VOLUME AND SIGNALING Edited by Peter K. Lauf and Norma C. Adragna Volume 560 MECHANISMS OF LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION AND IMMUNE REGULATION X: INNATE IMMUNITY Edited by Sudhir Gupta, William Paul, and Ralph Steinman Volume 561 CHEMISTRY AND SAFETY OF ACRYLAMIDE IN FOOD Edited by Mendel Friedman and Don Mottram A Continuation Order Plan is available for this series. A continuation order will bring delivery of each new volume immediately upon publication. Volumes are billed only upon actual shipment. For further information please contact the publisher. Chemistry and Safety of Acrylamide in Food Edited by Mendel Friedman Agricultural Research Service, USDA Albany, California and Don Mottram University of Reading Reading, United Kingdom Spriinge r Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Chemistry and safety of acrylamide in food/edited by Mendel Friedman and Don Mottram.
  • Towards Next Generation Risk Assessment of Chemicals: Bayesian

    Towards Next Generation Risk Assessment of Chemicals: Bayesian

    Towards next generation risk assessment of chemicals : bayesian meta-analysis of human variability in metabolism and transporters and application for the derivation of pathway-related uncertainty factors Keyvin Darney To cite this version: Keyvin Darney. Towards next generation risk assessment of chemicals : bayesian meta-analysis of human variability in metabolism and transporters and application for the derivation of pathway- related uncertainty factors. Toxicology. Université de Bretagne occidentale - Brest, 2020. English. NNT : 2020BRES0013. tel-03227086 HAL Id: tel-03227086 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03227086 Submitted on 16 May 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L'UNIVERSITE DE BRETAGNE OCCIDENTALE ECOLE DOCTORALE N° 605 Biologie Santé Spécialité : Toxicologie Par Keyvin DARNEY Towards next generation risk assessment of chemicals: Bayesian meta-analysis of Human variability in metabolism and transporters and application for the derivation of pathway-related uncertainty factors Thèse présentée
  • Dietary Intake and Biomarkers of Acrylamide Exposure and Risk of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer

    Dietary Intake and Biomarkers of Acrylamide Exposure and Risk of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer

    Dietary intake and biomarkers of acrylamide exposure and risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer A molecular epidemiologic study in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Mireia Obón Santacana Aquesta tesi doctoral està subjecta a la llicència Reconeixement- NoComercial – SenseObraDerivada 3.0. Espanya de Creative Commons. Esta tesis doctoral está sujeta a la licencia Reconocimiento - NoComercial – SinObraDerivada 3.0. España de Creative Commons. This doctoral thesis is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0. Spain License. REFERENCE LIST REFERENCE LIST 8. REFERENCE LIST 1. (1986) Acrylamide. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum 39:41–66. 2. Chen Y-H, Xia E-Q, Xu X-R, et al (2012) Evaluation of Acrylamide in Food from China by a LC/MS/MS Method. Int J Environ Res Public Health 9:4150–4158. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9114150 3. IARC (1994) IARC working group on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: some industrial chemicals. Lyon, 15-22 February 1994. IARC Monogr EvalCarcinogRisks Hum 60:1–560. 4. Sobel W, Bond GG, Parsons TW, Brenner FE (1986) Acrylamide cohort mortality study. Br J Ind Med 43:785–788. 5. Collins JJ, Swaen GM, Marsh GM, et al (1989) Mortality patterns among workers exposed to acrylamide. J Occup Med 31:614–617. 6. Le Quesne PM (1985) Clinical and morphological findings in acrylamide toxicity. Neurotoxicology 6:17–24. 7. Reynolds T (2002) Acrylamide and cancer: tunnel leak in Sweden prompted studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:876–878. 8. Törnqvist M, Bergmark E, Ehrenberg L, Granath F (1998) Risk assessment of acrylamide.
  • National Center for Toxicological Research Annual Report 2019

    National Center for Toxicological Research Annual Report 2019

    National Center for Toxicological Research 2019 Annual Report Vision, Mission, and Goals Vision The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s National Center for Toxicological Research is a global resource for collaboration—providing consultation, training, and innovative scientific solutions in support of FDA’s mission to improve public health. Mission NCTR conducts scientific research to generate data for FDA decision making, and develops and supports innovative tools and approaches that FDA uses to protect and promote individual and public health. NCTR Research Goals 2019 NCTR Annual Report Table of Contents (Please click on any of the sections below to quickly visit that section) 4 Preface ─ Message from the Director 5 Preface ─ About the Annual Report 6 NCTR Organization Structure ─ NCTR Leadership 7 NCTR Organization Structure ─ Research Division Directors 8 NCTR at a Glance 9 NCTR at a Glance ─ Numbers for 2019 12 2019 Research Collaborations 13 Collaborations ─ CDER 15 Collaborations ─ CTP 16 Collaborations ─ CFSAN 17 Collaborations ─ CVM 18 Collaborations ─ ORA 19 Collaborations ─ NIEHS/NTP 20 Science Advisory Board 21 Perinatal Health Center of Excellence 22 Global Summit on Regulatory Science (GSRS) 23 2019 NCTR Research Divisions and Important Accomplishments 24 Biochemical Toxicology 26 Bioinformatics & Biostatistics 28 Genetic & Molecular Toxicology 30 Microbiology 32 Neurotoxicology 34 Systems Biology 36 Office of Scientific Coordination www.fda.gov/nctr Message from the Director Preface The National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) premier laboratory research center focused on all FDA-regulated products. NCTR’s primary goal is to support FDA, a critical component of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), in its efforts to promote and protect the health of the American public.
  • Family Group Sheets Surname Index

    Family Group Sheets Surname Index

    PASSAIC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FAMILY GROUP SHEETS SURNAME INDEX This collection of 660 folders contains over 50,000 family group sheets of families that resided in Passaic and Bergen Counties. These sheets were prepared by volunteers using the Societies various collections of church, ceme tery and bible records as well as city directo ries, county history books, newspaper abstracts and the Mattie Bowman manuscript collection. Example of a typical Family Group Sheet from the collection. PASSAIC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FAMILY GROUP SHEETS — SURNAME INDEX A Aldous Anderson Arndt Aartse Aldrich Anderton Arnot Abbott Alenson Andolina Aronsohn Abeel Alesbrook Andreasen Arquhart Abel Alesso Andrews Arrayo Aber Alexander Andriesse (see Anderson) Arrowsmith Abers Alexandra Andruss Arthur Abildgaard Alfano Angell Arthurs Abraham Alje (see Alyea) Anger Aruesman Abrams Aljea (see Alyea) Angland Asbell Abrash Alji (see Alyea) Angle Ash Ack Allabough Anglehart Ashbee Acker Allee Anglin Ashbey Ackerman Allen Angotti Ashe Ackerson Allenan Angus Ashfield Ackert Aller Annan Ashley Acton Allerman Anners Ashman Adair Allibone Anness Ashton Adams Alliegro Annin Ashworth Adamson Allington Anson Asper Adcroft Alliot Anthony Aspinwall Addy Allison Anton Astin Adelman Allman Antoniou Astley Adolf Allmen Apel Astwood Adrian Allyton Appel Atchison Aesben Almgren Apple Ateroft Agar Almond Applebee Atha Ager Alois Applegate Atherly Agnew Alpart Appleton Atherson Ahnert Alper Apsley Atherton Aiken Alsheimer Arbuthnot Atkins Aikman Alterman Archbold Atkinson Aimone
  • Acrylamide in Food

    Acrylamide in Food

    COUNCIL FORFOR AGRICULTURALAGRICULTURAL SCIENCE SCIENCE AND AND TECHNOLOGY—1 TECHNOLOGY NUMBER 32 JUNE 2006 ACRYLAMIDE IN FOOD TASK FORCE MEMBERS: David Lineback, Co- chair, Joint Institute for Food Safety and Applied INTRODUCTION Nutrition, University of Maryland, College Park; studies or from human expo- In April 2002, researchers Michael W. Pariza, Cochair, Food Research sure in the workplace. Before at the Swedish National Food the Swedish study, no data Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Administration and Stockholm were available on the effects of University, using a new analyti- James Coughlin, Coughlin & Associates, La- acrylamide at the low concen- cal procedure, announced they guna Niguel, California; Catherine Davies, trations observed in food (i.e., had discovered the presence of Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Uni- in the microgram (µg)/kilo- acrylamide in foods prepared versity of Delaware, Newark; Beate Kettlitz,* gram (kg) [parts per billion by heating (frying, baking) at BEUC, the European Consumers’ Organization, (ppb)] range). temperatures above 120°C So acrylamide is not new, Brussels, Belgium; Lauren Posnick Robin, (Swedish 2002; Tareke et al. but its presence in food is 2002). Identification of Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, newly discovered. Increased acrylamide in these foods, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College concern about the effect of which include french fries, po- Park, Maryland; David Schmidt, International acrylamide on human health tato chips (crisps), cookies (bis-
  • Surnames Beginning With

    Surnames Beginning With

    Card# MineName Operator Year Month Day Surname First and Middle Name Age Fatal/Nonfatal In/Outside Occupation Nationality Citizen/Alien Single/Married #Children Mine Experince Occupation Exp. Accident Cause or Remarks Fault County Mining Dist. Film# CoalType 14 Vesta No.4 Vesta Coal 1937 2 18 Babak Frank 28 nonfatal inside brakeman Slavic single thumb caught between car bumpers Washington 21st 3600 bituminous 32 Elma No.3 Baker Whitely Coal 1938 6 14 Babalanis William 18 nonfatal inside machine miner single rock broke & fell on foot heading Somerset 24th 3601 bituminous 7 Elma No.3 Baker Whitely Coal 1937 2 2 Babalonis Charles 29 nonfatal inside scraper Lithuanian citizen single foot caught under machine unloading Somerset 24th 3600 bituminous 117 Somers Pittsburgh Coal 1937 11 2 Babar Louis 35 nonfatal inside machine miner Hungarian married fall of slate in room Fayette 9th 3600 bituminous 12 Isabella Weirton Coal 1938 5 6 Babba Harry M 46 nonfatal inside married hernia lifting timber rail room Fayette 16th 3600 bituminous 33 Colonial No.3 H C Frick Coke 1939 6 24 Babchak John J 25 nonfatal inside brakeman married caught foot in clevices broke foot Fayette 9th 3601 bituminous 66 Heisley No.3 Heisley Coal 1937 9 22 Baber Louis 20 nonfatal inside machine miner Slavic single loose strand in hoist rope hit thumb Cambria 10th 3600 bituminous 91 Springfield No.1 Springfield Coal 1939 10 27 Babich Walter 57 nonfatal inside miner married caught car & roof broke hand Cambria 10th 3601 bituminous 5 Big Bend Big Bend Coal Mining 1942 9 28 Babinscak
  • Genotoxicity of Acrylamide and Glycidamide: a Review of the Studies by HPRT Gene and TK Gene Mutation Assays

    Genotoxicity of Acrylamide and Glycidamide: a Review of the Studies by HPRT Gene and TK Gene Mutation Assays

    Genes and Environment, Vol. 34, No. 1 pp. 1–8 (2012) Review Genotoxicity of Acrylamide and Glycidamide: A Review of the Studies by HPRT Gene and TK Gene Mutation Assays Lin Ao1,2 and Jia Cao1,2,3 1Institute of Toxicology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China 2Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Radiation Damage and Medical Protection, Ministry of Education of China, Chongqing, PR China (Received September 19, 2011; Revised December 6, 2011; Accepted December 28, 2011) Acrylamide (AA), a proven rodent carcinogen, is found very high temperatures, as a result of Maillard reactions in a variety of commonly consumed human foods, which involving asparagine and reducing sugars (3). Total die- has raised public health concerns. AA is largely oxidized to tary daily AA intake has been estimated to correspond the chemically reactive epoxide, glycidamide (GA), by to about 0.5 mg AA per kg body weight on the basis of a cytochrome P450 2E1. The genotoxic eŠects of AA and normal western diet (4,5). In 2002, a consultation held GA have been extensively evaluated. However, the results by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United in mammalian gene mutation tests were inconsistent, es- Nations(FAO)andtheWorldHealthOrganization pecially the genotoxic eŠects at the HPRT gene and TK gene. In this article, the relevant mutations induced by AA (WHO) concluded that AA represented a ``major prob- and GA on both gene loci in various test systems involving lem'', because of the relative high levels in these foods in vivo and in vitro tests are reviewed.
  • Brooklyn College Foundation ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 Brooklyn College Foundation 2015–2016­­ Annual Report

    Brooklyn College Foundation ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 Brooklyn College Foundation 2015–2016­­ Annual Report

    2015 –2016 Annual Report Brooklyn College Foundation ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 Brooklyn College Foundation 2015 –2016 Annual Report Dear Alumni and Friends, Dear Alumni and Friends, Welcome to the Brooklyn College Foundation’s FY16 Annual Report, covering the period from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. This was a year of transition. We wrapped up our $200 million Foundation for Success Campaign, bid farewell to retiring President Karen Gould — who provided Brooklyn College with seven years of exceptional leadership — and welcomed our new president, Michelle Anderson. President Anderson comes to Brooklyn College from her previous position as dean of the CUNY School of Law, where she oversaw a period of great renewal and transformation in facilities, programs, and recognition. We on the foundation board are excited to work with her on our mutual mission to continue to provide affordable access to excellent higher education. This year’s report focuses on the impact of key donor gifts as well as the work of the foundation as we prepare for our next capital campaign. I am exceedingly proud that during FY16, the foundation provided more than $2 million to nearly 1,500 students in the form of scholarships, awards, travel grants, internships, fellowships, and emergency grants; and, for faculty, more than $450,000 in the form of professorships, chairs, travel awards, lectureships, and professional development support. All of us at the foundation are grateful to the more than 5,000 donors who share our steadfast commitment to Brooklyn College, its mission, and its students. Sincerely, Edwin H. Cohen ’62 Chair, Brooklyn College Foundation Brooklyn College Foundation 2 3 Brooklyn College Foundation 2015 –2016 Annual Report Dear Alumni and Friends of Brooklyn College, When he laid the cornerstone for the gymnasium building on our beautiful campus, President Franklin D.
  • Russian Military Capability in a Ten-Year Perspective 2016

    Russian Military Capability in a Ten-Year Perspective 2016

    The Russian Armed Forces are developing from a force primarily designed for handling internal – 2016 Perspective Ten-Year in a Capability Military Russian disorder and conflicts in the area of the former Soviet Union towards a structure configured for large-scale operations also beyond that area. The Armed Forces can defend Russia from foreign aggression in 2016 better than they could in 2013. They are also a stronger instrument of coercion than before. This report analyses Russian military capability in a ten-year perspective. It is the eighth edition. A change in this report compared with the previous edition is that a basic assumption has been altered. In 2013, we assessed fighting power under the assumption that Russia was responding to an emerging threat with little or no time to prepare operations. In view of recent events, we now estimate available assets for military operations in situations when Russia initiates the use of armed force. The fighting power of the Russian Armed Forces is studied. Fighting power means the available military assets for three overall missions: operational-strategic joint inter-service combat operations (JISCOs), stand-off warfare and strategic deterrence. The potential order of battle is estimated for these three missions, i.e. what military forces Russia is able to generate and deploy in 2016. The fighting power of Russia’s Armed Forces has continued to increase – primarily west of the Urals. Russian military strategic theorists are devoting much thought not only to military force, but also to all kinds of other – non-military – means. The trend in security policy continues to be based on anti- Americanism, patriotism and authoritarianism at home.