DOCSLIB.ORG

Grand Canyon, III: the Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grand Canyon, III: the Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. The Mogollon Rim is the geographic feature that provides the physical boundary between the northern third or so and the southern two-thirds or so of Arizona. It is the southern edge of the Kaibab Plateau, which was uplifted when a plate moved under what is now the plateau. The Kaibab Plateau cracked, like a plate of glass dropped on a small linear object, like a pencil—I’ve done this when working with stained glass. The Mogollon Rim is not always obvious—it has crumbled over the years, and piles of talus in some places make it look like a slope. But it’s the edge, and I decided to take a hike in a place where the edge looks like an edge. This part of Arizona is what made the Grand Canyon possible; I consider it the southernmost part of the Grand Canyon area. The drive to the trailhead was something; the road follows a historic trail that was part of the pony express in the area and then a route that Zane Grey followed when he traveled through the region. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. Short-horned lizards (Phrynosoma douglassi) are my favorite lizards in Arizona, and the lizards are my favorite group of animals in Arizona. These guys are celebrities in my version of the universe. They are weird in the lizard world for being ovoviviparous—how many words are there with three v’s in them? They hatch from their eggs inside the females and are born live. I like to see their varying colors. These two were within about fifty feet of one another along the trail, and one is red, and one is gray. They match their backgrounds, maybe because they burrow into the ground at night and to preserve body fluids, and maybe because if they don’t match, they get eaten, which would eliminate the not-matching lizards quickly. These are both young ones, but they are old enough to have survived the winter. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. Where the Mogollon Rim looks like an edge, there is about a thousand-foot difference between the top of the rim and the ground level below the rim. The trail to the top from the Rt. 261 trailhead (another picturesquely named trailhead) was a gradual ascent mostly through a forested area. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. It seems like this sign should be classified, but maybe the point is so obvious that there’s no reason not to post it out in public. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. A little over a third of the 12.5-mile (20.117 km) loop was on the top of the rim: easy, level walking in the forest, with views of the rim and miles and miles into the distance to the south. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. I had expected to be able to see far enough to see the desert, and maybe I could, but the distance turned everything blue, and I couldn’t tell if or when the forests ended and the desert began. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. A view of the road, Rt. 261, from the edge of the rim Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. Part of the trail wasn’t marked because there isn’t officially a loop trail, so I did a little bit of bushwhacking to connect the end of the Highline Trail to the Drew Trail, the route back down from the edge. In the online description of the trail, what the hiker/writer called the Mogollon Rim Vista Loop, the unmarked section of non-trail, I found the following information: “As long as you don’t cross Rim Road (or fall off the Rim), you’ll end up at the confluence of Rim Road 300 and FR 9350 near Drew trailhead.” That advice worked. This was some of the easiest bushwhacking I’ve ever done; I tracked along the edge and didn’t fall off, while having a good look at some aggressive forest management. I don’t know if the forest was managed before or during the Tinder Fire, which was in progress while I was out for the hike. The tricky part of the bushwhacking came about once I was no longer bushwhacking—neither of the numbered roads were labeled. I followed the edge of the rim until I reached the Drew Trail and ignored the information about the roads. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. The forest changes quickly with elevation changes. The hike along the bottom of the rim was hot and mostly sunny. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. The lizards and birds were the majority of the wildlife that I saw while hiking, but there were a lot of elk in the area, judging from the amount of scat and number of tracks. While in the bushwhacking section, I followed elk trails when convenient and paid particular attention to an elk who must be one of the largest elk I’ve ever not seen. I found the enormous tracks several times on the top of the rim and this clear one on the trail once I was off the rim. It’s too bad I missed him—I assume he was an enormous bull. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. The ants were working hard, as usual, and these carpenter ants (there are over a thousand species of carpenter ants, so I didn’t try to figure out which ones live in Arizona; it should be noted that the information about ants that pops up first when searching for information about kinds of ants is from every exterminator company in the state). The lupines are easier; they are probably Arizona lupines (Lupinus arizonicus); it doesn’t appear that anyone is devoted to exterminating the lupines. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. I wish that the alligator juniper (Juniperus deppeana) were fir because I would like to be able to talk about alligator fir. The bark makes it clear why the juniper is named as it is in English. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. This is the largest alligator juniper along the trail, and the largest I’ve encountered. Juniper are important to indigenous people throughout the trees’ range in North America. The berries are used for food, the leaves are used for medicines, and hunters have rubbed themselves down with juniper before going out, disguising their scents from evil spirits and other potential predators. By the end of the hike, I’m sure that any predator in Arizona knew what and where I was. I didn’t fall off, over, or down, and I didn’t get eaten—another successful hike. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Area Land Use Plan
    DETAIL VIEW #1 RIM TRAIL ESTATES DETAIL VIEW #2 GIRL SCOUT CAMP 260 KOHL'S RANCH VERDE GLEN FR 199 TONTO CREEK 5 THOMPSON THOMPSON DRAW I E. VERDE RIVER DRAW II BOY SCOUT CAMP FR 64 FR 64 WHISPERING PINES PINE MEADOWS BEAR FLATS FR 199 DETAIL VIEW #3 FLOWING SPRINGS DETAIL VIEW #4 DETAIL VIEW #5 DIAMOND POINT FOREST HOMES & 87 FR 29 COLLINS RANCH E. VERDE RIVER COCONINO COUNTY EAST VERDE PARK FR 64 260 FR 64 TONTO VILLAGE GILA COUNTYLION SPRINGS DETAIL VIEW #6 DETAIL VIEW #7 DETAIL VIEW #8 FR 200 FR FR 291 PONDEROSA SPRINGS CHRISTOPHER CREEK 260 HAIGLER CREEK HAIGLER CREEK (HIGHWAY 260 REALIGNMENT) COLCORD MOUNTAIN HOMESITES HUNTER CREEK FR 200 DETAIL VIEW #9 DETAIL VIEW #10 DETAIL VIEW #11 ROOSEVELT LAKE ESTATES 87 FR 184 188 OXBOW ESTATES SPRING CREEK 188 JAKES CORNER KEY MAP: LEGEND Residential - 3.5 to 5 du/ac Residential - 5 to 10 du/ac Regional Highways and Significant Roadways NORTHWEST NORTHEAST Major Rivers or Streams Residential - 10+ du/ac Gila County Boundary Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial WEST EAST Federal/Incorporated Area Lands CENTRAL CENTRAL Light Industrial LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS Heavy Industrial SOUTH Residential - 0 to 0.1 du/ac Public Facilities AREA LAND USE PLAN Residential - 0.1 to 0.4 du/ac DETAILED VIEWS Multi-Functional Corridor FIGURE 2.F Residential - 0.4 to 1.0 du/ac Mixed Use Residential - 1 to 2 du/ac Resource Conservation 0' NOVEMBER, 2003 3 Mi Residential - 2 to 3.5 du/ac GILA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2012 Potential Resort/Lodging Use 1 1/2 Mi GILA COUNTY, ARIZONA DETAIL VIEW #1 RIM TRAIL ESTATES DETAIL VIEW #2 GIRL SCOUT CAMP 260 KOHL'S RANCH VERDE GLEN FR 199 TONTO CREEK 5 THOMPSON THOMPSON DRAW I E.
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY REPORT of INVESTIGATIONS of SPRINGS in the MOGOLLON RIM REGION, ARIZONA By
    United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey PRELIMINARY REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS OF SPRINGS IN THE MOGOLLON RIM REGION, ARIZONA By J. H. Feth With sections on: Base flow of streams By N. D. White and Quality of water By J. D. Hem Open-file report. Not reviewed for conformance with editorial standards of the Geological Survey. Tucson, Arizona June 1954 CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................................... 1 Introduction................................................. 3 Purpose and scope of investigation.......................... 3 Location and extent of area ................................ 4 Previous investigations.................................... 5 Personnel and acknowledgments ............................ 5 Geography .................................................. 6 Land forms and physiographic history ...................... 6 Drainage ................................................ 6 Climate ................................................. 6 Development and industry.................................. 8 Minerals"................................................. 9 Water ................................................... 9 Geology .................................................... 10 Stratigraphy ............................................. 10 Rocks of pre-Mesozoic age ............................. 10 Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks .................... 10 Tertiary and Quaternary sedimentary rocks .............. 11 Lake beds .......................................... 11 San Carlos basin
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Hydrogeologic Model for Fossil Springs, Western
    A CONCEPTUAL HYDROGEOLOGIC MODEL FOR FOSSIL SPRINGS, WESTERN MOGOLLON RIM, ARIZONA: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SPRINGS PROCESSES By L. Megan Green A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geology Northern Arizona University May 2008 Approved: _________________________________ Abraham E. Springer, Ph.D., Chair _________________________________ Roderic A. Parnell, Jr., Ph.D. _________________________________ Paul J. Umhoefer, Ph.D. ABSTRACT A CONCEPTUAL HYDROGEOLOGIC MODEL FOR FOSSIL SPRINGS, WEST MOGOLLON MESA, ARIZONA: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SPRINGS PROCESSES L. Megan Green Fossil Springs is the largest spring system discharging along the western Mogollon Rim in central Arizona and is a rare and important resource to the region. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of the source of groundwater discharging at Fossil Springs. This was accomplished by (1) constructing a 3-D digital hydrogeologic framework model from available data to depict the subsurface geology of the western Mogollon Rim region and (2) by compiling and interpreting regional structural and geophysical data for Arizona’s central Transition Zone. EarthVision, a 3-D GIS modeling software, was used to construct the framework model. Two end-member models were created; the first was a simple interpolation of the data and the second was a result of geologic interpretations. The second model shows a monocline trending along the Diamond Rim fault. Both models show Fossil Springs discharging at the intersection of the Diamond Rim fault and Fossil Springs fault, at the contact between the Redwall Limestone and Naco Formation. The second objective of this study was a compilation of regional data for Arizona’s central Transition Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1567-A PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL AND GEOLOGY OF THE RATTLESNAKE ROADLESS AREA, COCONINO AND YAVAPAI COUNTIES, ARIZONA By Thor N. V. Karlstrom and George H. Billingsley, U.S. Geological Survey and Robert McColly, U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a geological and mineral survey of the Rattlesnake Roadless Area (03054), Coconino National Forest, Coconino and Yavapai Counties, Ariz. The Rattlesnake Roadless Area was classified as a further planning area during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE E) by the U.S. Forest Service, January 1979. MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL SUMMARY STATEMENT The mineral resource potential of the Rattlesnake Roadless Area, Ariz., is evaluated as low based on field studies performed by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix / Attachment 1A
    ATTACHMENT 1A (Supplemental Documentation to the: Mogollon Rim Water Resource, Management Study Report of Findings) Geology and Structural Controls of Groundwater, Mogollon Rim Water Resources Management Study by Gaeaorama, Inc., July, 2006 GEOLOGY AND STRUCTURAL CONTROLS OF GROUNDWATER, MOGOLLON RIM WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT STUDY Prepared for the Bureau of Reclamation GÆAORAMA, INC. Blanding, Utah DRAFT FOR REVIEW 22 July 2006 CONTENTS page Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………….. 1 MRWRMS ii 1/18/11 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………... 2 GIS database……………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Faults and fault systems………………………………………………………………………… 6 Proterozoic faults…………………………………………………………………………… 6 Re-activated Proterozoic faults……………………………………………………………... 6 Post-Paleozoic faults of likely Proterozoic inheritance…………………………………….. 7 Tertiary fault systems……………………………………………………………………….. 8 Verde graben system……………………………………………………………………. 8 East- to northeast-trending system……………………………………………………… 9 North-trending system…………………………………………………………………...9 Regional disposition of Paleozoic strata………………………………………………………. 10 Mogollon Rim Formation – distribution and implications……………………………………..10 Relation of springs to faults…………………………………………………………………… 11 Fossil Springs……………………………………………………………………………… 13 Tonto Bridge Spring………………………………………………………………………..14 Webber Spring and Flowing Spring………………………………………………………..15 Cold Spring………………………………………………………………………………... 16 Fossil Canyon-Strawberry-Pine area…………………………………………………………...17 Speculations on aquifer systems……………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Spring Chemistry Along the South Rim of Grand Canyon in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona —A U.S
    Prepared in cooperation with the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Assessment of Spring Chemistry Along the South Rim of Grand Canyon in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona —A U.S. Geological Survey and National Park Service Partnership — Spring flow from the south rim of Spring Resource Issues —Changes in the quality, quantity, Grand Canyon (fig. 1) is an important and sustainability of flow from springs resource in Grand Canyon National Park Tributary streams occupy 0.003 percent can affect the long-term health of (GCNP). Springs offer refuge to endemic of the area of Grand Canyon; however, biological communities and riparian and exotic terrestrial wildlife species and 36 percent of the total riparian flora habitats associated with these areas. help maintain the riparian areas associated exists within those confines (John Rihs, —Climate variability can affect with this resource. Recent real estate hydrologist, GCNP, written commun., spring flow and thus the riparian habitats development on the Coconino Plateau 2002). Baseline, seasonal, and annual associated with these areas. (fig. 1), a subregion of the Colorado Plateau water-quality data from springs along —Ground-water pumpage from the south of Grand Canyon, has heightened the south rim and identification of spring Redwall and Muav Limestones south of the awareness of environmental groups, sources are needed to address four issues Grand Canyon may affect spring flow. commercial developers, and resource identified by GCNP: managers to the importance of spring —The quality of water from springs ���� ����� resources. Native Americans in the Grand and seeps can limit recreational use of Canyon region, such as the Havasupai the water.
    [Show full text]
  • (Central Arizona) GEOSPHERE
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Incision history of the Verde Valley region and implications for uplift of the Colorado Plateau (central Arizona) 1 2 2 GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 4 Richard F. Ott , Kelin X. Whipple , and Matthijs van Soest 1Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland 2School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, 781 S. Terrace Road, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01640.1 12 figures; 3 tables; 1 supplemental file ABSTRACT et al., 2008; Moucha et al., 2009; Huntington et al., 2010; Liu and Gurnis, 2010; Flowers and Farley, 2012; Crow et al., 2014; Darling and Whipple, 2015; Karl- CORRESPONDENCE: richard .ott1900@ gmail .com The record of Tertiary landscape evolution preserved in Arizona’s transition strom et al., 2017). As part of this debate, the incision of the Mogollon Rim, zone presents an independent opportunity to constrain the timing of Colo­ the southwestern edge of the Colorado Plateau (Fig. 1), is not well constrained CITATION: Ott, R.F., Whipple, K.X., and van Soest, rado Plateau uplift and incision. We study this record of landscape evolution in the literature, and disparate ideas about its formation and incision history M., Incision history of the Verde Valley region and implications for uplift of the Colorado Plateau by mapping Tertiary sediments, volcanic deposits, and the erosional uncon­ have been proposed (Peirce et al., 1979; Lindberg, 1986; Elston and Young, ( central Ari zona): Geosphere, v. 14, no. 4, p. 1690– formity at their base, 40Ar/39Ar dating of basaltic lava flows in key locations, and 1991; Holm, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Sneed Feasibility Study 2004
    The Feasibility of Gray Wolf Reintroduction to the Grand Canyon Ecoregion Paul G. Sneed Environmental Studies , Master of Arts Program, Prescott College, 4906 Box Canyon Road, Billings, MT 59101; (406) 245-9117; (fax) (406) 245-0787; [email protected] Abstract As part of a regional conservation planning initiative, this study is being undertaken to determine the biophysical and socioeconomic feasibility of reestablishing a top carnivore, the gray wolf (Canis lupus), in the Grand Canyon Ecoregion (GCE). The GCE is a roughly 1.5 million km2 area located on the southern Colorado Plateau. The last remaining gray wolves were probably eradicated in the 1920s and 1930s. Because of an interest in restoring extirpated native species to this ecoregion, and the desire to increase the size of the gray wolf metapopulation in the Southwest, there is need for an objective and spatially explicit landscape-scale model of potential gray wolf habitat. The first phase of this conservation GIS analysis involves utilizing six habitat characteristics or factors—vegetation cover, surface water availability, prey density, human population density, road density, and land ownership—to identify and describe potential reintro- duction sites in the Arizona section of the Grand Canyon Ecoregion. Initial results show that there are at least two localities in northern Arizona suitable for reintroduction of around 100 wolves. This paper is a preliminary report on observations, results, and some recommendations deriving from the feasibility study. Introduction Crumbo 1998). This paper, how- Regardless of inaccuracies in the Conservation biologists have shown ever, will focus on current, prelimi- historical record, a partial picture of that large or top carnivores are often nary results from research done on where wolves occurred prior to their keystone species whose removal a limited number of factors in the extermination in the Southwest can jeopardizes the maintenance of eco- northern Arizona section of the still be pieced together.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9. Paleozoic Vertebrate Ichnology of Grand Canyon National Park
    Chapter 9. Paleozoic Vertebrate Ichnology of Grand Canyon National Park By Lorenzo Marchetti1, Heitor Francischini2, Spencer G. Lucas3, Sebastian Voigt1, Adrian P. Hunt4, and Vincent L. Santucci5 1Urweltmuseum GEOSKOP / Burg Lichtenberg (Pfalz) Burgstraße 19 D-66871 Thallichtenberg, Germany 2Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) Laboratório de Paleontologia de Vertebrados and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências, Instituto de Geociências Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil 3New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science 1801 Mountain Road N.W. Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87104 4Flying Heritage and Combat Armor Museum 3407 109th St SW Everett, Washington 98204 5National Park Service Geologic Resources Division 1849 “C” Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20240 Introduction Vertebrate tracks are the only fossils of terrestrial vertebrates known from Paleozoic strata of Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA), therefore they are of great importance for the reconstruction of the extinct faunas of this area. For more than 100 years, the upper Paleozoic strata of the Grand Canyon yielded a noteworthy vertebrate track collection, in terms of abundance, completeness and quality of preservation. These are key requirements for a classification of tracks through ichnotaxonomy. This chapter proposes a complete ichnotaxonomic revision of the track collections from GRCA and is also based on a large amount of new material. These Paleozoic tracks were produced by different tetrapod groups, such as eureptiles, parareptiles, synapsids and anamniotes, and their size ranges from 0.5 to 20 cm (0.2 to 7.9 in) footprint length. As the result of the irreversibility of the evolutionary process, they provide useful information about faunal composition, faunal events, paleobiogeographic distribution and biostratigraphy.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Management Areas
    Chapter 3. Management Areas Introduction to Management Areas Management areas are areas that have similar management intent and a common management strategy that are more specific than forestwide guidance provided in Chapter 2. This direction does not substitute for or repeat forestwide direction, but rather provides additional direction for the applicable area. In the event that a plan decision in this section and the forestwide component in another section conflict, the more restrictive plan decision generally prevails. A project or activity-level evaluation, however, may be required to resolve the conflict; generally, however, the more restrictive plan decision prevails. Some management areas are special areas that have been designated by Congress or an office of the Executive Branch. They are managed to protect the special features or character for which they were designated and must be managed in accordance with relevant law, regulation, and policy and any area- specific management plan, such as the Verde River Comprehensive River Management Plan. Because of the complication of carrying forward direction from the previous forest plan there are two management areas that overlay the Sedona-Oak Creek Management Area (MA). The Oak Creek Canyon and House Mountain-Lowlands MAs are both subject to direction for the Sedona-Oak Creek MA and have unique direction that applies only to these overlay areas. In addition, there are several guidelines in the Sedona-Oak Creek MA to which the House Mountain-Lowlands MA is an exception. Scenery desired conditions (desired landscape character) for wilderness and wild and scenic rivers is described in the MA direction. For other management areas, see the Landscape Character Zones for this direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Plants, Volume 21, Number 1 (June 2005)
    Desert Plants, Volume 21, Number 1 (June 2005) Item Type Article Authors Gilbert, Edward; Licher, Max Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 11/10/2021 04:19:28 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555883 Volume 21, Number 1 June 2005 Desert Published by The University of Arizona for the Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum Plants Flora and Vegetation of the West Fork of Oak Creek Canyon, Coconino County, Arizona Edward Gilbert and Max Licher 2 Desert Plants 2005 Desert Plants Volume 21, Number 1, June 2005 A journal devoted to broadening knowledge of plants Published by The University of Arizona indigenous or adapted to arid and sub-arid regions and to for the Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum encouraging the appreciation of these plants. 37615 E. Highway 60 Superior, Arizona 85273-5100 Margaret A. Norem, Editor 2120 E. Allen Road Copyright2005 Tucson, Arizona 85719 The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of The University ( 520) 318-7046 of Arizona [email protected] The Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum at Superior, Arizona is cooperatively managed by the Arizona State Parks Board, Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum, Inc. and The University of Arizona. Underwriters Supporters 1. Animas Foundation 1. Michael N. Baker 2. Arid Zone Trees 2. Richard G. Beidleman 3. Josiah T. Austin 3. Jeanne Bensema 4. Walter Camp 4. John M. Bridges 5. Mary Hope Dillon 5. Bronson Joy Brown 6. Frank W. Ellis 6. Jack L. Carter 7. Ron Gass, Mountain States Nursery 7.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Description of the Mogollon Highlands Ecoregion by Thomas Fleischner1, David Hanna1, and Lisa Floyd-Hanna2
    A Preliminary Description of the Mogollon Highlands Ecoregion by Thomas Fleischner1, David Hanna1, and Lisa Floyd-Hanna2 In this paper, we describe and present the results of our efort southern counterpart, the Sonoran Desert, and its northern to establish a spatial delineation of the Mogollon Highlands neighbor, the Colorado Plateau. Tis region roughly follows the region—an ecologically fascinating North American transition interface of two great physiographic provinces of the American zone of continental importance. Tis dramatic landscape of West — the Basin and Range and the Colorado Plateau (Hunt escarpments, canyons, mesas, deserts, and high conifer 1967). Due to great geologic diversity (Nations and Stump forests—where the Sonoran Desert of the Basin and Range 1996), it presents dramatic topographic diversity—varying Province meets the redrock country of the Colorado Plateau several thousand feet in elevation and including a series of and the Southern Rocky Mountains, where the northern limits deep canyon systems that drain of the Colorado Plateau and of some species coexist with the southern limits of others—is a emerge into the low Sonoran Desert. land of high biological, ecological, and cultural diversity. Tis Te region’s positioning at a continental-scale biogeographic area of dramatic elevational gradients, at a continental-scale crossroads contributes to its tremendous ecological diversity. biogeographic crossroads, is especially well-suited for studies Te southern extent of the Rocky Mountains intersects the that can provide understanding of global climate change and eastern portion of the Mogollon Highlands. All four of North the capacity of species and ecological communities to adapt. America’s deserts connect directly with the region: the Great The Region Basin Desert to the north, the Mojave to the west, and the Sonoran and Chihuahuan to the south.
    [Show full text]