Paul Sneed Feasibility Study 2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paul Sneed Feasibility Study 2004 The Feasibility of Gray Wolf Reintroduction to the Grand Canyon Ecoregion Paul G. Sneed Environmental Studies , Master of Arts Program, Prescott College, 4906 Box Canyon Road, Billings, MT 59101; (406) 245-9117; (fax) (406) 245-0787; psneed@prescott.edu Abstract As part of a regional conservation planning initiative, this study is being undertaken to determine the biophysical and socioeconomic feasibility of reestablishing a top carnivore, the gray wolf (Canis lupus), in the Grand Canyon Ecoregion (GCE). The GCE is a roughly 1.5 million km2 area located on the southern Colorado Plateau. The last remaining gray wolves were probably eradicated in the 1920s and 1930s. Because of an interest in restoring extirpated native species to this ecoregion, and the desire to increase the size of the gray wolf metapopulation in the Southwest, there is need for an objective and spatially explicit landscape-scale model of potential gray wolf habitat. The first phase of this conservation GIS analysis involves utilizing six habitat characteristics or factors—vegetation cover, surface water availability, prey density, human population density, road density, and land ownership—to identify and describe potential reintro- duction sites in the Arizona section of the Grand Canyon Ecoregion. Initial results show that there are at least two localities in northern Arizona suitable for reintroduction of around 100 wolves. This paper is a preliminary report on observations, results, and some recommendations deriving from the feasibility study. Introduction Crumbo 1998). This paper, how- Regardless of inaccuracies in the Conservation biologists have shown ever, will focus on current, prelimi- historical record, a partial picture of that large or top carnivores are often nary results from research done on where wolves occurred prior to their keystone species whose removal a limited number of factors in the extermination in the Southwest can jeopardizes the maintenance of eco- northern Arizona section of the still be pieced together. These records logical integrity in large-scale ecosys- ecoregion (see Figure 1). show that at least small populations tems (Soule and Noss 1998; Terborgh of wolves were found throughout the et al. 1999). Therefore, conservation Historic occurrence and woodlands and forests of northern planners interested in restoring and taxonomic position Arizona (Brown 1984). For example, protecting large ecosystems or To accurately reconstruct the his- from these records we know that there ecoregions emphasize recovery of top toric distribution of gray wolves in were at least 30 wolves on or near the predators. The primary goal of this the GCE is challenging for a vari- North Kaibab because of the number study—which is supported by the ety of reasons. Nineteenth century reported killed between 1907 and Grand Canyon Wildlands Council, writers often accidentally or pur- 1926 (Russo 1964). Brown (1984) Defenders of Wildlife, and Prescott posefully misidentified coyotes claimed that "the last wolf in this part College—is to determine the capabil- (Canis latrans), wolves, and wolf- of northern Arizona was taken on the ity and suitability (together, the fea- dog hybrids (Gipson et al. 1998). Paria Plateau about 1928", but a sibility) of reintroducing one top car- Wolf hunters and trappers some- former Civilian Conservation Corps nivore, the gray wolf (Canis lupus), times exaggerated the number of worker recently reported that he saw to the Grand Canyon Ecoregion wolves in an area to enhance their wolves on three different occasions (GCE) (Figure 1). job security and occasionally mis- in 1935 on the North Rim of Grand Ultimately, this study will ad- represented where a wolf was killed Canyon National Park (GCNP) dress 26 factors or aspects, grouped in order to claim a local bounty. (Leslie, personal communication). into two dimensions—biophysical Furthermore, the widespread use of Moreover, "as recently as March 3, and human—that are expected to af- poisons meant that many animals, 1948, assistant chief ranger A.L. fect the feasibility of wolf recovery including wolves, were dispatched Brown reported wolf tracks in fresh in the entire GCE (Sneed and without any record of their death. snow in the area of Bright Angel Vol. 18 No. 4 2001 Endangered Species UPDATE 153 contemporary molecular ge- to adequate food supplies, security netics (Wayne et al. 1992). from human disturbance and perse- Adopting this approach, cution are important factors affect- Nowak (1995) lumps the two ing the suitability of a landscape for previously identified GCE wolf recovery. At this stage in the wolf subspecies, (C. l. research, three critical human di- mogollonensis and C. l. mension aspects are considered: youngii), in with the geographi- human population density, road cally widespread subspecies C. density, and land status. l. nubilus. Nowak (1995) also affirms the validity of a truly Biophysical factors Southwestern subspecies, the Several reintroduction studies (e.g., Mexican wolf (C. l. baileyii), Mladenoff et al. 1995) suggest that which may have occupied or gray wolves, at least those living Figure 1. Grand Canyon ecoregion dispersed into the southeast- south of the Arctic, tend to prefer for- ern part of the GCE. ested landscapes. Historically, in the Southwest, wolves were most com- Point" on the North Rim of GCNP Habitat capability and monly found associated with wood- (Hoffmeister 1971). Finally, the last suitability mapping lands and montane forests (Groebner wolf inhabiting the Mogollon Rim Restoration of viable large carnivore et al. 1995; FWS 1996). When ob- area in the southern part of the GCE populations is probably among served elsewhere, such as in grass- was reportedly taken in 1942 society's greatest challenges, requir- lands, they were probably simply (Hoffmeister 1986). Clearly, gray ing extraordinary innovation and co- passing through as they moved be- wolves occurred within the Grand operative management on an tween their preferred habitat of for- Canyon Ecoregion well into the twen- ecoregional scale (Paquet and Hack- ested highlands. Figure 2 maps the tieth century, although their exact man 1995). Furthermore, solutions distribution of these two vegetation numbers and range will probably to large predator conservation are types, as well as others such as never be known with certainty. economic, sociological and political shrublands and grasslands. This fig- Due to the taxonomic splitting (human dimension issues), as well as ure plainly illustrates a broad band of approach of the time, Young and biological and ecological (biophysi- forestlands-woodlands extending Goldman (1944) identified 23 sub- cal factors) (Clark et al. 1996). The north-south from the Kaibab Pla- species of North American gray feasibility of wolf recovery depends teau, through the Flagstaff area to wolves (based on skull measure- on the capability and suitability of the Mogollon Rim, interrupted only ments, pelage color, and size) and habitat for sustaining wolf popula- by the Grand Canyon and urbanized mapped their geographic distribution. tions. Although many factors can and areas such as Flagstaff. Other ar- Two of these 23 nominal subspe- should be considered, the ultimate de- eas of woodland/forest vegetation cies—C.l. mogollonensis (the Ari- terminants are ungulate prey and hu- types are found in isolated moun- zona wolf), C.l. youngii (the Great man impact (Fuller et al. 1992) or, put tain areas of the Arizona Strip as Basin or Intermountain wolf), and, another way, sustenance and security. well as the Hualapai and Navajo possibly, C.l. baileyii (the Mexican Course screen landscape-scale Indian Reservations. wolf)—inhabited the Grand Can- habitat mapping for the Arizona por- Because wolves require large yon Ecoregion (Brown 1984; FWS tion of the GCE (see Figure 1) has amounts of water to aid digestion 1996). Development of similar been done following other similar (Lopez 1978; Mech 1970), several classification schemes continued studies (Mladenoff et al. 1995; studies of wolves in the Southwest into the 1970s (e.g., Hall and Quinby et al. 1999; Ratti et al. 1999; (Groebner et al. 1995; FWS 1996) Kelson 1959) until some taxono- Wydeven et al. 1998). Various bio- and elsewhere (Quinby et al. 1999) mists began questioning the split- physical factors can be considered in have suggested that the availability ting tradition of wolf taxonomy. evaluating the capability of habitat to of free water is an important deter- Modern lumping systems of wolf support wolves, but this study focuses minant of gray wolf abundance and taxonomy are based on multivariate on vegetation cover, surface water distribution. Figure 3 illustrates the statistical analysis of large sample availability, and, most importantly, distribution of currently mapped sizes and confirmed by the results of ungulate prey abundance. In addition lakes, springs, and streams in the Ari- 154 Endangered Species UPDATE Vol. 18 No. 4 2001 man population den- sity. Studies (e.g., Mladenoff et al. 1995; Ratti et al. 1999) have shown that lands with a hu- man population den- sity greater than 12 to 13 persons per square kilometer will not be suitable wolf habitat. The Figure 2. Vegetation cover Figure 3. Surface water map displayed in Figure 6 indicates zona portion of the Grand Canyon teau enjoys a very high density of that most of the Arizona section of Ecoregion. Although the digital data mule deer (eight to 13 animals per the Grand Canyon Ecoregion has available is very incomplete, this fig- km2), while the remainder of the area population densities less than 13 per- ure shows that there are more than has an adequate density of three to sons per km2. Except for the Flag- enough sources of surface water on eight deer per km2. The Coconino staff-Sedona urban zone, the entire the Kaibab Plateau, in the Flagstaff Plateau around Flagstaff also supports north-south corridor from the Kaibab area, and along the Mogollon Rim. quite dense populations (three to eight Plateau to the eastern, slightly urban- This conclusion is supported by the per km2).
Recommended publications
  • Area Land Use Plan
    DETAIL VIEW #1 RIM TRAIL ESTATES DETAIL VIEW #2 GIRL SCOUT CAMP 260 KOHL'S RANCH VERDE GLEN FR 199 TONTO CREEK 5 THOMPSON THOMPSON DRAW I E. VERDE RIVER DRAW II BOY SCOUT CAMP FR 64 FR 64 WHISPERING PINES PINE MEADOWS BEAR FLATS FR 199 DETAIL VIEW #3 FLOWING SPRINGS DETAIL VIEW #4 DETAIL VIEW #5 DIAMOND POINT FOREST HOMES & 87 FR 29 COLLINS RANCH E. VERDE RIVER COCONINO COUNTY EAST VERDE PARK FR 64 260 FR 64 TONTO VILLAGE GILA COUNTYLION SPRINGS DETAIL VIEW #6 DETAIL VIEW #7 DETAIL VIEW #8 FR 200 FR FR 291 PONDEROSA SPRINGS CHRISTOPHER CREEK 260 HAIGLER CREEK HAIGLER CREEK (HIGHWAY 260 REALIGNMENT) COLCORD MOUNTAIN HOMESITES HUNTER CREEK FR 200 DETAIL VIEW #9 DETAIL VIEW #10 DETAIL VIEW #11 ROOSEVELT LAKE ESTATES 87 FR 184 188 OXBOW ESTATES SPRING CREEK 188 JAKES CORNER KEY MAP: LEGEND Residential - 3.5 to 5 du/ac Residential - 5 to 10 du/ac Regional Highways and Significant Roadways NORTHWEST NORTHEAST Major Rivers or Streams Residential - 10+ du/ac Gila County Boundary Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial WEST EAST Federal/Incorporated Area Lands CENTRAL CENTRAL Light Industrial LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS Heavy Industrial SOUTH Residential - 0 to 0.1 du/ac Public Facilities AREA LAND USE PLAN Residential - 0.1 to 0.4 du/ac DETAILED VIEWS Multi-Functional Corridor FIGURE 2.F Residential - 0.4 to 1.0 du/ac Mixed Use Residential - 1 to 2 du/ac Resource Conservation 0' NOVEMBER, 2003 3 Mi Residential - 2 to 3.5 du/ac GILA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2012 Potential Resort/Lodging Use 1 1/2 Mi GILA COUNTY, ARIZONA DETAIL VIEW #1 RIM TRAIL ESTATES DETAIL VIEW #2 GIRL SCOUT CAMP 260 KOHL'S RANCH VERDE GLEN FR 199 TONTO CREEK 5 THOMPSON THOMPSON DRAW I E.
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY REPORT of INVESTIGATIONS of SPRINGS in the MOGOLLON RIM REGION, ARIZONA By
    United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey PRELIMINARY REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS OF SPRINGS IN THE MOGOLLON RIM REGION, ARIZONA By J. H. Feth With sections on: Base flow of streams By N. D. White and Quality of water By J. D. Hem Open-file report. Not reviewed for conformance with editorial standards of the Geological Survey. Tucson, Arizona June 1954 CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................................... 1 Introduction................................................. 3 Purpose and scope of investigation.......................... 3 Location and extent of area ................................ 4 Previous investigations.................................... 5 Personnel and acknowledgments ............................ 5 Geography .................................................. 6 Land forms and physiographic history ...................... 6 Drainage ................................................ 6 Climate ................................................. 6 Development and industry.................................. 8 Minerals"................................................. 9 Water ................................................... 9 Geology .................................................... 10 Stratigraphy ............................................. 10 Rocks of pre-Mesozoic age ............................. 10 Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks .................... 10 Tertiary and Quaternary sedimentary rocks .............. 11 Lake beds .......................................... 11 San Carlos basin
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Hydrogeologic Model for Fossil Springs, Western
    A CONCEPTUAL HYDROGEOLOGIC MODEL FOR FOSSIL SPRINGS, WESTERN MOGOLLON RIM, ARIZONA: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SPRINGS PROCESSES By L. Megan Green A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geology Northern Arizona University May 2008 Approved: _________________________________ Abraham E. Springer, Ph.D., Chair _________________________________ Roderic A. Parnell, Jr., Ph.D. _________________________________ Paul J. Umhoefer, Ph.D. ABSTRACT A CONCEPTUAL HYDROGEOLOGIC MODEL FOR FOSSIL SPRINGS, WEST MOGOLLON MESA, ARIZONA: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SPRINGS PROCESSES L. Megan Green Fossil Springs is the largest spring system discharging along the western Mogollon Rim in central Arizona and is a rare and important resource to the region. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of the source of groundwater discharging at Fossil Springs. This was accomplished by (1) constructing a 3-D digital hydrogeologic framework model from available data to depict the subsurface geology of the western Mogollon Rim region and (2) by compiling and interpreting regional structural and geophysical data for Arizona’s central Transition Zone. EarthVision, a 3-D GIS modeling software, was used to construct the framework model. Two end-member models were created; the first was a simple interpolation of the data and the second was a result of geologic interpretations. The second model shows a monocline trending along the Diamond Rim fault. Both models show Fossil Springs discharging at the intersection of the Diamond Rim fault and Fossil Springs fault, at the contact between the Redwall Limestone and Naco Formation. The second objective of this study was a compilation of regional data for Arizona’s central Transition Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1567-A PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL AND GEOLOGY OF THE RATTLESNAKE ROADLESS AREA, COCONINO AND YAVAPAI COUNTIES, ARIZONA By Thor N. V. Karlstrom and George H. Billingsley, U.S. Geological Survey and Robert McColly, U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a geological and mineral survey of the Rattlesnake Roadless Area (03054), Coconino National Forest, Coconino and Yavapai Counties, Ariz. The Rattlesnake Roadless Area was classified as a further planning area during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE E) by the U.S. Forest Service, January 1979. MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL SUMMARY STATEMENT The mineral resource potential of the Rattlesnake Roadless Area, Ariz., is evaluated as low based on field studies performed by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix / Attachment 1A
    ATTACHMENT 1A (Supplemental Documentation to the: Mogollon Rim Water Resource, Management Study Report of Findings) Geology and Structural Controls of Groundwater, Mogollon Rim Water Resources Management Study by Gaeaorama, Inc., July, 2006 GEOLOGY AND STRUCTURAL CONTROLS OF GROUNDWATER, MOGOLLON RIM WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT STUDY Prepared for the Bureau of Reclamation GÆAORAMA, INC. Blanding, Utah DRAFT FOR REVIEW 22 July 2006 CONTENTS page Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………….. 1 MRWRMS ii 1/18/11 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………... 2 GIS database……………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Faults and fault systems………………………………………………………………………… 6 Proterozoic faults…………………………………………………………………………… 6 Re-activated Proterozoic faults……………………………………………………………... 6 Post-Paleozoic faults of likely Proterozoic inheritance…………………………………….. 7 Tertiary fault systems……………………………………………………………………….. 8 Verde graben system……………………………………………………………………. 8 East- to northeast-trending system……………………………………………………… 9 North-trending system…………………………………………………………………...9 Regional disposition of Paleozoic strata………………………………………………………. 10 Mogollon Rim Formation – distribution and implications……………………………………..10 Relation of springs to faults…………………………………………………………………… 11 Fossil Springs……………………………………………………………………………… 13 Tonto Bridge Spring………………………………………………………………………..14 Webber Spring and Flowing Spring………………………………………………………..15 Cold Spring………………………………………………………………………………... 16 Fossil Canyon-Strawberry-Pine area…………………………………………………………...17 Speculations on aquifer systems……………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Spring Chemistry Along the South Rim of Grand Canyon in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona —A U.S
    Prepared in cooperation with the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Assessment of Spring Chemistry Along the South Rim of Grand Canyon in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona —A U.S. Geological Survey and National Park Service Partnership — Spring flow from the south rim of Spring Resource Issues —Changes in the quality, quantity, Grand Canyon (fig. 1) is an important and sustainability of flow from springs resource in Grand Canyon National Park Tributary streams occupy 0.003 percent can affect the long-term health of (GCNP). Springs offer refuge to endemic of the area of Grand Canyon; however, biological communities and riparian and exotic terrestrial wildlife species and 36 percent of the total riparian flora habitats associated with these areas. help maintain the riparian areas associated exists within those confines (John Rihs, —Climate variability can affect with this resource. Recent real estate hydrologist, GCNP, written commun., spring flow and thus the riparian habitats development on the Coconino Plateau 2002). Baseline, seasonal, and annual associated with these areas. (fig. 1), a subregion of the Colorado Plateau water-quality data from springs along —Ground-water pumpage from the south of Grand Canyon, has heightened the south rim and identification of spring Redwall and Muav Limestones south of the awareness of environmental groups, sources are needed to address four issues Grand Canyon may affect spring flow. commercial developers, and resource identified by GCNP: managers to the importance of spring —The quality of water from springs ���� ����� resources. Native Americans in the Grand and seeps can limit recreational use of Canyon region, such as the Havasupai the water.
    [Show full text]
  • (Central Arizona) GEOSPHERE
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Incision history of the Verde Valley region and implications for uplift of the Colorado Plateau (central Arizona) 1 2 2 GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 4 Richard F. Ott , Kelin X. Whipple , and Matthijs van Soest 1Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland 2School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, 781 S. Terrace Road, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01640.1 12 figures; 3 tables; 1 supplemental file ABSTRACT et al., 2008; Moucha et al., 2009; Huntington et al., 2010; Liu and Gurnis, 2010; Flowers and Farley, 2012; Crow et al., 2014; Darling and Whipple, 2015; Karl- CORRESPONDENCE: richard .ott1900@ gmail .com The record of Tertiary landscape evolution preserved in Arizona’s transition strom et al., 2017). As part of this debate, the incision of the Mogollon Rim, zone presents an independent opportunity to constrain the timing of Colo­ the southwestern edge of the Colorado Plateau (Fig. 1), is not well constrained CITATION: Ott, R.F., Whipple, K.X., and van Soest, rado Plateau uplift and incision. We study this record of landscape evolution in the literature, and disparate ideas about its formation and incision history M., Incision history of the Verde Valley region and implications for uplift of the Colorado Plateau by mapping Tertiary sediments, volcanic deposits, and the erosional uncon­ have been proposed (Peirce et al., 1979; Lindberg, 1986; Elston and Young, ( central Ari zona): Geosphere, v. 14, no. 4, p. 1690– formity at their base, 40Ar/39Ar dating of basaltic lava flows in key locations, and 1991; Holm, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon, III: the Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D
    Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. The Mogollon Rim is the geographic feature that provides the physical boundary between the northern third or so and the southern two-thirds or so of Arizona. It is the southern edge of the Kaibab Plateau, which was uplifted when a plate moved under what is now the plateau. The Kaibab Plateau cracked, like a plate of glass dropped on a small linear object, like a pencil—I’ve done this when working with stained glass. The Mogollon Rim is not always obvious—it has crumbled over the years, and piles of talus in some places make it look like a slope. But it’s the edge, and I decided to take a hike in a place where the edge looks like an edge. This part of Arizona is what made the Grand Canyon possible; I consider it the southernmost part of the Grand Canyon area. The drive to the trailhead was something; the road follows a historic trail that was part of the pony express in the area and then a route that Zane Grey followed when he traveled through the region. Grand Canyon, III: The Mogollon Rim, 2018: Marla Perkins, Ph.D. Short-horned lizards (Phrynosoma douglassi) are my favorite lizards in Arizona, and the lizards are my favorite group of animals in Arizona. These guys are celebrities in my version of the universe. They are weird in the lizard world for being ovoviviparous—how many words are there with three v’s in them? They hatch from their eggs inside the females and are born live.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9. Paleozoic Vertebrate Ichnology of Grand Canyon National Park
    Chapter 9. Paleozoic Vertebrate Ichnology of Grand Canyon National Park By Lorenzo Marchetti1, Heitor Francischini2, Spencer G. Lucas3, Sebastian Voigt1, Adrian P. Hunt4, and Vincent L. Santucci5 1Urweltmuseum GEOSKOP / Burg Lichtenberg (Pfalz) Burgstraße 19 D-66871 Thallichtenberg, Germany 2Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) Laboratório de Paleontologia de Vertebrados and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências, Instituto de Geociências Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil 3New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science 1801 Mountain Road N.W. Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87104 4Flying Heritage and Combat Armor Museum 3407 109th St SW Everett, Washington 98204 5National Park Service Geologic Resources Division 1849 “C” Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20240 Introduction Vertebrate tracks are the only fossils of terrestrial vertebrates known from Paleozoic strata of Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA), therefore they are of great importance for the reconstruction of the extinct faunas of this area. For more than 100 years, the upper Paleozoic strata of the Grand Canyon yielded a noteworthy vertebrate track collection, in terms of abundance, completeness and quality of preservation. These are key requirements for a classification of tracks through ichnotaxonomy. This chapter proposes a complete ichnotaxonomic revision of the track collections from GRCA and is also based on a large amount of new material. These Paleozoic tracks were produced by different tetrapod groups, such as eureptiles, parareptiles, synapsids and anamniotes, and their size ranges from 0.5 to 20 cm (0.2 to 7.9 in) footprint length. As the result of the irreversibility of the evolutionary process, they provide useful information about faunal composition, faunal events, paleobiogeographic distribution and biostratigraphy.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Management Areas
    Chapter 3. Management Areas Introduction to Management Areas Management areas are areas that have similar management intent and a common management strategy that are more specific than forestwide guidance provided in Chapter 2. This direction does not substitute for or repeat forestwide direction, but rather provides additional direction for the applicable area. In the event that a plan decision in this section and the forestwide component in another section conflict, the more restrictive plan decision generally prevails. A project or activity-level evaluation, however, may be required to resolve the conflict; generally, however, the more restrictive plan decision prevails. Some management areas are special areas that have been designated by Congress or an office of the Executive Branch. They are managed to protect the special features or character for which they were designated and must be managed in accordance with relevant law, regulation, and policy and any area- specific management plan, such as the Verde River Comprehensive River Management Plan. Because of the complication of carrying forward direction from the previous forest plan there are two management areas that overlay the Sedona-Oak Creek Management Area (MA). The Oak Creek Canyon and House Mountain-Lowlands MAs are both subject to direction for the Sedona-Oak Creek MA and have unique direction that applies only to these overlay areas. In addition, there are several guidelines in the Sedona-Oak Creek MA to which the House Mountain-Lowlands MA is an exception. Scenery desired conditions (desired landscape character) for wilderness and wild and scenic rivers is described in the MA direction. For other management areas, see the Landscape Character Zones for this direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Plants, Volume 21, Number 1 (June 2005)
    Desert Plants, Volume 21, Number 1 (June 2005) Item Type Article Authors Gilbert, Edward; Licher, Max Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 11/10/2021 04:19:28 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555883 Volume 21, Number 1 June 2005 Desert Published by The University of Arizona for the Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum Plants Flora and Vegetation of the West Fork of Oak Creek Canyon, Coconino County, Arizona Edward Gilbert and Max Licher 2 Desert Plants 2005 Desert Plants Volume 21, Number 1, June 2005 A journal devoted to broadening knowledge of plants Published by The University of Arizona indigenous or adapted to arid and sub-arid regions and to for the Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum encouraging the appreciation of these plants. 37615 E. Highway 60 Superior, Arizona 85273-5100 Margaret A. Norem, Editor 2120 E. Allen Road Copyright2005 Tucson, Arizona 85719 The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of The University ( 520) 318-7046 of Arizona mnorem@ag.arizona.edu The Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum at Superior, Arizona is cooperatively managed by the Arizona State Parks Board, Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum, Inc. and The University of Arizona. Underwriters Supporters 1. Animas Foundation 1. Michael N. Baker 2. Arid Zone Trees 2. Richard G. Beidleman 3. Josiah T. Austin 3. Jeanne Bensema 4. Walter Camp 4. John M. Bridges 5. Mary Hope Dillon 5. Bronson Joy Brown 6. Frank W. Ellis 6. Jack L. Carter 7. Ron Gass, Mountain States Nursery 7.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Description of the Mogollon Highlands Ecoregion by Thomas Fleischner1, David Hanna1, and Lisa Floyd-Hanna2
    A Preliminary Description of the Mogollon Highlands Ecoregion by Thomas Fleischner1, David Hanna1, and Lisa Floyd-Hanna2 In this paper, we describe and present the results of our efort southern counterpart, the Sonoran Desert, and its northern to establish a spatial delineation of the Mogollon Highlands neighbor, the Colorado Plateau. Tis region roughly follows the region—an ecologically fascinating North American transition interface of two great physiographic provinces of the American zone of continental importance. Tis dramatic landscape of West — the Basin and Range and the Colorado Plateau (Hunt escarpments, canyons, mesas, deserts, and high conifer 1967). Due to great geologic diversity (Nations and Stump forests—where the Sonoran Desert of the Basin and Range 1996), it presents dramatic topographic diversity—varying Province meets the redrock country of the Colorado Plateau several thousand feet in elevation and including a series of and the Southern Rocky Mountains, where the northern limits deep canyon systems that drain of the Colorado Plateau and of some species coexist with the southern limits of others—is a emerge into the low Sonoran Desert. land of high biological, ecological, and cultural diversity. Tis Te region’s positioning at a continental-scale biogeographic area of dramatic elevational gradients, at a continental-scale crossroads contributes to its tremendous ecological diversity. biogeographic crossroads, is especially well-suited for studies Te southern extent of the Rocky Mountains intersects the that can provide understanding of global climate change and eastern portion of the Mogollon Highlands. All four of North the capacity of species and ecological communities to adapt. America’s deserts connect directly with the region: the Great The Region Basin Desert to the north, the Mojave to the west, and the Sonoran and Chihuahuan to the south.
    [Show full text]