Peover Superior Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Statement November

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peover Superior Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Statement November PEOVER SUPERIOR NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN CONSULTATION STATEMENT NOVEMBER 2019 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This consultation statement has been prepared to fulfil the legal obligations of the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012 in respect of the Peover Superior (Over Peover) Neighbourhood Plan. The legal basis of the Statement is provided by Section 15 (2) of Part 5 of the 2012 Neighbourhood Planning Regulations, which requires that a consultation statement should: Contain details of the persons and bodies who were consulted about the proposed Peover Superior Neighbourhood Plan; Explain how they were consulted; Summarise the main issues and concerns raised by the persons consulted; Describe how those issues and concerns have been considered and, where relevant, addressed in the proposed Peover Superior Neighbourhood Plan. 1.2 The Neighbourhood Area is in the unitary authority of Cheshire East Council, and comprises of a rural Parish within the Green Belt. The parish has a small population of some 666 residents (at the time of the 2011 census). The relatively small number of residents has meant that consultation with members of the community has been a real possibility at a manageable scale, which has helped to allow the community to become aware of the Neighbourhood Plan, and to contribute to its development through various consultation events and a questionnaire. Additionally, the Parish Council has published information on the village website https://www.overpeover.com which has pages dedicated to the Neighbourhood Plan, where Neighbourhood Plan documents and background evidence have been published and available to view. 2 BACKGROUND 2.1 The Peover Superior Neighbourhood Plan is a community plan and must derive its vision, objectives and policies from the community. From the outset the Parish Council was determined that the residents should be kept informed and given every opportunity to inform the Steering Group of their views. Communication and consultation, in various forms, have played a major role in formulating the Neighbourhood Plan. 2.2 Throughout the process, the neighbourhood planning steering group has engaged in consultations with the community, using a variety of methods in order to gain as many views as possible. 2.3 It was considered essential to: Promote a high degree of awareness of the project; Form a steering group that contained both Parish Council members and volunteers from the local community; Encourage everyone to contribute to the development of the Neighbourhood Plan; Promote consultation events and provide regular updates on the status of the Neighbourhood Plan and its development. 2.4 Key to this programme was publicity to gain residents’ engagement. This was gained via public meetings, drop-ins, newsletters, a questionnaire, and electronic media via the village website. Consultation versions of the Neighbourhood Plan were available to view on the Parish website, along with other documents and reports. (https://www.overpeover.com) 2.5 Every effort has been made to ensure that the vision, objectives and policies of the Over Peover Neighbourhood Plan reflect the views of the majority of the local residents, whilst having regard to local and national policies. 2.6 The Neighbourhood Plan has been developed through regular consultation with the residents of and businesses in, Over Peover. Cheshire East Council Planning department has also been consulted throughout the process and has provided invaluable information and advice. The Neighbourhood was formally designated by Cheshire East Council on 5th April 2017. 3. NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN PRESENTATION 3.1 Who was consulted and how were they consulted? The Neighbourhood Plan steering group held a presentation to the community on 27th September 2017, held at the village hall. The presentation comprised of a power point, followed by questions and answers. The event was advertised by a flyer delivered to each household and approximately 40 local residents attended. The power point presentation can be seen at http://www.overpeover.com/wp- content/uploads/2018/03/Neighbourhood-Plan.pdf 3.2 The presentation was well received, and set out to address - What is driving us to change what we already have? What is a Neighbourhood Plan and why do we need one? What is the process and how long will it take? Who needs to be involved? 3.3 What issues and concerns were raised? Residents asked a number of questions regarding the process of developing a Neighbourhood Plan, and discussed whether it would be a useful document to have, and what it could achieve. 3.4 How have the issues and concerns been considered? Residents were supportive of the decision to produce a Neighbourhood Plan, and agreed that it would be a valuable document that would be of great use to the parish. It was decided that the next steps would include a questionnaire, to find out in more detail what issues residents would like to see addressed in the Neighbourhood Plan. It was also considered sensible to learn from other parishes; establish contact with local groups; and determine with residents, businesses, school and community groups what policies ought to be covered in the Neighbourhood Plan. 4 SHORT SURVEY OF RESIDENTS 4.1 Who was consulted and how were they consulted? In early October 2017 a short survey was delivered by hand to every household in the parish. The survey requested views on the development of 12-14 homes in the village, plus a village community facility which had been proposed by Crabtree Homes. The survey was to be returned by October 22nd either by post to the parish clerk, or by hand to one of three collection points at the village pubs. 4.2 What issues and concerns were raised? There were 282 surveys distributed, and 116 were returned, a response rate of 41%. Almost 90% of households (101 returns) objected or strongly objected to the proposal tabled by Crabtree Homes. Five households were either supportive or strongly supportive of the proposal. 4.3 Those that were supportive highlighted in their comments that communities need to develop, that more housing is needed nationally and that “the offer of a free Village Hall should not be dismissed out of hand”. Of those that objected or strongly objected to the proposal and provided comments, the overwhelming reasons were to the building of houses on greenbelt land and the precedent that this development would set; there being no proven need for additional housing in the Village; and the additional traffic and the access to the site which was considered as being on a dangerous bend. Other objections cited that the village facilities were inadequate to meet the additional housing; that the proposal was not aligned to the Parish Plan in terms of preserving the openness of the Village and preferring development on brownfield sites; and that a more centralised location nearer the school was preferred for a new Village Hall. 4.4 How have the issues and concerns been considered? The results of the survey were fed back to the residents in a village newsletter, which was delivered to each household. The newsletter can be viewed at http://www.overpeover.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Proposed- Development-in-the-Village-Results.pdf. The results highlighted that residents were keen to protect the Green Belt, were concerned about traffic, and also that they would prefer a new village hall, were one to be forthcoming, to be centrally located. It was therefore felt that a traffic survey should be undertaken, and also discussions undertaken with Cheshire East Council regarding the likelihood of a new village hall being delivered within the Parish, and where the most suitable location for this may be. 5 RESIDENTS’ QUESTIONNAIRE 5.1 Who was consulted and how were they consulted? A more detailed questionnaire was delivered by a team of volunteers to every household in the parish in early 2018, to be completed by the end of January. A covering letter explaining the purpose of the questionnaire was also delivered. (The questionnaire results and analysis can be viewed at http://www.overpeover.com/wp- content/uploads/2018/03/Questionnaire-Results-Report.pdf ) 5.2 The questionnaire explained that priorities were being sought in order to understand what issues were important to the community and should be covered in the Neighbourhood Plan. It asked a number of questions, focussing on what people liked and disliked about living in the parish, and asked people to score out of ten how high a priority certain issues were to them. These covered Green Belt protection; gaps within developments; house building; types of new housing; extensions; employment; traffic; a new village hall and biodiversity. 5.3 The questionnaires could be returned by post, popped into one of the collection points at the three village pubs, or handed to one of the Parish Councillors. 5.4 What issues and concerns were raised? 288 questionnaires were delivered, and 76 responses were received, a response rate of 26%, and the results showed what the main priorities and areas of concern to the residents were. 5.5 When asked what residents like about living in the parish of Over Peover, the main response was the countryside and rural situation, and the friendly community, peace and quiet and the pubs. The main dislike was associated with traffic through the village, the threat of new developments in the Green Belt, and the state of the village hall. 5.6 The questionnaire results highlighted that there was emphatic support in favour of protecting the Green Belt. The next highest priority was to protect the open spaces and green gaps within the village. The availability of superfast broadband was considered to be of high importance, along with the need to reduce the impact of traffic through the village. The next highest issue of priority was the promotion and protection of biodiversity, followed by design.
Recommended publications
  • Pub Walks Walks from the Dog
    PUB WALKS WALKS FROM THE DOG 1. Over Peover Trek Distance: 4.3 miles 2. Sandle Bridge Lane to Peover Hall Distance: 10 miles 3. Peover Heath Stroll Distance: 2.5 miles 4. History of Over Peover WALKS FROM THE SHIP Southern Woods Walk, Quarry Bank Mill 5. Distance: 1 mile Kingsher Walk, Quarry Bank Mill 6. Distance: 1.5 miles Styal Circuit 7 - 8. Distance: 9 miles 9. History of Styal Over Peover Trek Distance: 4.3 miles 1. Turn right out of e Dog car park and walk along Well Bank Lane until you meet a crossroads known as 4 Lane Ends. A signpost points towards Peover Hall where we will take a left, sticking to the signed footpath and entering the estate by a stout wooden gate. 2. Just past a stable, a gate takes us forward along an avenue of trees leading to a stile between two ponds. Head across parkland to an ornamental gate and turn right, then follow a path past St Lawrence’s Church. 3. Go through a stand of mature trees until you come to a stile. Leave the trees and turn left, then shortly after take a right over a second stile. Keep along the fence on your right, and then enter a copse when you come to a barrier. Exit by another stile, keeping in the same direction. At the next stile keep left on a well-dened track towards an iron estate gate beside a pond. 4. Go through the gate and follow the dead-straight track to meet the A50.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4 Detailed Proposals for Each Ward – Organised by Local Area Partnership (LAP)
    Appendix 4 Detailed proposals for each Ward – organised by Local Area Partnership (LAP) Proposed Wards within the Knutsford Local Area Partnership Knutsford Local Area Partnership (LAP) is situated towards the north-west of Cheshire East, and borders Wilmslow to the north-east, Macclesfield to the south-east and Congleton to the south. The M6 and M56 motorways pass through this LAP. Hourly train services link Knutsford, Plumley and Mobberley to Chester and Manchester, while in the east of this LAP hourly trains link Chelford with Crewe and Manchester. The town of Knutsford was the model for Elizabeth Gaskell's novel Cranford and scenes from the George C. Scott film Patton were filmed in the centre of Knutsford, in front of the old Town Hall. Barclays Bank employs thousands of people in IT and staff support functions at Radbroke Hall, just outside the town of Knutsford. Knutsford is home to numerous sporting teams such as Knutsford Hockey Club, Knutsford Cricket Club, Knutsford Rugby Club and Knutsford Football Club. Attractions include Tatton Park, home of the RHS Flower show, the stately homes Arley Hall, Tabley House and Peover Hall, and the Cuckooland Museum of cuckoo clocks. In detail, the proposals are: Knutsford is a historic, self-contained urban community with established extents and comprises the former County Ward of Knutsford, containing 7 polling districts. The Parish of Knutsford also mirrors the boundary of this proposal. Knutsford Town is surrounded by Green Belt which covers 58% of this proposed division. The proposed ward has excellent communications by road, motorway and rail and is bounded to the north by Tatton Park and to the east by Birkin Brook.
    [Show full text]
  • Counciltaxbase201819appendix , Item 47
    APPENDIX A COUNCIL TAX - TAXBASE 2018/19 COUNCIL TAX - TAXBASE 2018/19 BAND D TAX BASE BAND D TAX BASE CHESHIRE EAST EQUIVALENTS 99.00% CHESHIRE EAST EQUIVALENTS 99.00% Acton 163.82 162.18 Kettleshulme 166.87 165.20 Adlington 613.67 607.53 Knutsford 5,813.84 5,755.70 Agden 72.04 71.32 Lea 20.78 20.57 Alderley Edge 2,699.00 2,672.01 Leighton 1,770.68 1,752.97 Alpraham 195.94 193.98 Little Bollington 88.34 87.45 Alsager 4,498.81 4,453.82 Little Warford 37.82 37.44 Arclid 154.71 153.17 Lower Peover 75.81 75.05 Ashley 164.05 162.41 Lower Withington 308.54 305.45 Aston by Budworth 181.97 180.15 Lyme Handley 74.74 74.00 Aston-juxta-Mondrum 89.56 88.66 Macclesfield 18,407.42 18,223.35 Audlem 937.36 927.98 Macclesfield Forest/Wildboarclough 112.25 111.13 Austerson 49.34 48.85 Marbury-cum-Quoisley 128.25 126.97 Baddiley 129.37 128.07 Marton 113.19 112.06 Baddington 61.63 61.02 Mere 445.42 440.96 Barthomley 98.14 97.16 Middlewich 4,887.05 4,838.18 Basford 92.23 91.31 Millington 101.43 100.42 Batherton 24.47 24.23 Minshull Vernon 149.65 148.16 Betchton 277.16 274.39 Mobberley 1,458.35 1,443.77 Bickerton 125.31 124.05 Moston 277.53 274.76 Blakenhall 70.16 69.46 Mottram St Andrew 416.18 412.02 Bollington 3,159.33 3,127.74 Nantwich 5,345.68 5,292.23 Bosley 208.63 206.54 Nether Alderley 386.48 382.61 Bradwall 85.68 84.82 Newbold Astbury-cum-Moreton 374.85 371.10 Brereton 650.89 644.38 Newhall 413.32 409.18 Bridgemere 66.74 66.07 Norbury 104.94 103.89 Brindley 73.30 72.56 North Rode 125.29 124.04 Broomhall 87.47 86.59 Odd Rode 1,995.13 1,975.18 Buerton
    [Show full text]
  • Peover Superior Parish Newsletter
    Peover Superior Parish Newsletter Volume 8 Issue 2 Autumn/Winter 2018 Parish Councillors Pie n’ Peas and Bingo Friday 16th Nov Kathy Doyle - 01625 861691 Phil Welch - 01625 861261 Over Peover Village Hall Management Committee invites you Dave Clarke - 07940 916539 to a Pie n’ Peas and Bingo Night at the Village Hall Vicki Irlam - 07787 103311 Jayne Rudd - 01565 722621 David Irlam - 07787 103300 John Hehir - 07870 555789 Susan Mills - 07702 231647 Sheila Read - 01625 860385 Contact Details for the Parish Council: Shareen Worthington (Parish Clerk) 07786 324125 1 Woodlands End or [email protected] Chelford Macclesfield SK11 9BF Email: [email protected] School Games Gold success for Peover A special thanks to: Mr Townsend for delivering such excellent P.E lessons and coaching in readiness for Superior Pupils competitions, Mr Wilkes, Regional Director of Premier Peover Superior Primary School are delighted to Sport, for his continued support in the delivery of high announce that they have achieved the School Games quality P.E, the wonderful children who show such Gold Mark Award for the 2017/18 academic year. enthusiasm and pride in representing their school and The Government led award scheme, launched in 2012, their parents who continually offer their support at is facilitated by the Youth Sport Trust to reward schools inter-school competitions. for their commitment to the development of competition across their school and into the community. Their sporting achievements this year include: Winners of the Years 5 and 6 7-a-side Football Tournament, 1st place in the Boys' Freestyle, Girls' Freestyle and Girls' Backstroke at the Swimming Gala, Winners of the Years 5 and 6 Tennis Tournament, 1st place in Years 3 and 4 Girls' Cross Country, 1st place in Years 5 and 6 Girls' Cross Country and 1st place in Years 5 and 6 Boys' Cross Country.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Chelford Lower Peover Peover Superior Nether Alderley Ollerton
    Parish Ollerton & Plumley with Chelford Lower Peover Peover Superior Nether Alderley Marthall Toft & Bexton Snelson Burglaries Dwellings Burglaries Non- 09/09 11.59 01/09 18.29 Dwellings Stocks Lane Over Bollington Lane Peover possible tools and building garden items equipment 21/09 Bollington Lane – Black Quad type bike 24/09 08.55 Alderley Park Congleton Road Keys from buildings Theft Other 28/09 11.46 15/09 12.42 20/09 18.59 22/09 14.55 Dixon Drive Middlewich Congleton Rd – Trouthall Lane – Road – BT cable theft of post Scrap metal theft Property lost / 11/09 11.16 found Toft Road – lost keys Suspicious 02/09 15.31 15/09 20.53 09/09 08.15 Welsh 02/09 11.13 Persons / Knutsford Rd Parkgate Ave Row 2 x Males Ascol Drive – vehicles 2 Males Over Peover – 3 driving up and Males Vans & 05/09 Carter males knocking down the road Dogs Lane separate on doors asking 10/09 reported males trying to for money 11.02 overnight take electricity Chelford Road Soss readings – no Moss 3 sections of entry gained fencing down 999 Alarms all 13/09 00.22 27/09 14.56 31/08 00.29 Artists 09/09 00.19 in Order Knutsford Holmes Chapel Rd Lane Chelford Road Road 16/09 Congleton Marthall Road Parish Ollerton & Plumley with Chelford Lower Peover Peover Superior Nether Alderley Marthall Toft & Bexton Snelson Anti-Social 01/09 18.29 03/09 17.45 A34 – 27/09 Ash Lane 05/09 Plumley Behaviour chelford Vehicle Ollerton – Vehicle Moor Road - Railway & persons vehicle station 11/09 12.43 Seven Sisters Lane Quad bike interfering with horse and rider on a main road 22/09 Bexton Lane – Noise Criminal 24/09 12.30 Damage between 11/09 & 24/09 2 x windows Animals in the Road Traffic 24/09 12.24 07/09 Welsh Row 02/09 10.06 30/08 16.15 Incidents, A537 Broken Parking complaint Marthall -Concern Seven Sisters Obstruction, Down Vehicle 20/09 A34 Alderley for safety re type Lane Toft Large tree, parked Edge Tree Down of machine on Rocks in the vehicles etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parish Council 0F Lower Peover Comprising Nether Peover Peover Inferior (Cheshire West and Chester) (Cheshire East) Clerk to the Council: Mr
    The Parish Council 0f Lower Peover Comprising Nether Peover Peover Inferior (Cheshire West and Chester) (Cheshire East) Clerk to the Council: Mr. Geoffrey Parker 5 Daisy Close Pickmere WA16 0WE Tel: 07842510313 Email: [email protected] Dear Councillor, Parish Councillors are summoned to attend the next Parish Council Meeting which will be held at 7.30 pm on Wednesday 8th July 2020 at https://us04web.zoom.us/j/3630348928?pwd=SWlXN0w0Sm9WRXVrU3J2eUhUbDhBUT09 Yours sincerely, Geoffrey Parker Clerk to the Council Agenda 1. To receive apologies for absence 2. To note declarations of members’ interests 3. Public Participation: A period not exceeding 10 minutes for members of the public to ask questions or submit comments (at the Chairman’s discretion) 4. To receive and confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 13th May 2020 (attached) 5. To receive a police report (attached) 6. To receive news from the Unitary Authority Councillors 7. To receive an update on the activities of the Lower Peover Covid-19 Support Group. 8. Parish Plan To receive an update on progress from each Councillor leading a work-stream in the Parish Plan. 9. Personal Information To approve the collection and retention of Personal data as required by the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) (attached). 10. To approve the Risk Register for 2020/21 (attached). 11. Finance a. Review of the Council’s and/or staff subscriptions to other bodies. 1. CHALC and NALC £158.04 2. Cheshire Community Action £20 3. SLCC membership for Parish Clerk £TBA b. To approve the 2020/21 list of due payments which arise on a regular basis in accordance with Financial Regulation 5.6 (attached) c.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Poll PCC Election
    ELECTION OF A POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER CHESHIRE POLICE AREA NOTICE OF POLL Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a Police and Crime Commissioner for the Cheshire Police Area will be held on THURSDAY 6 MAY 2021, between the hours of 7.00am and 10.00pm. 2. The number of persons to be elected is ONE. 3. The full names, places of residence, and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated are as set out below :- Name of Candidate Address Description Jo Address in Over & Verdin Ward Liberal Democrat CONCHIE John Vincent Address in Crewe and Nantwich The Conservative Party DWYER Candidate Nick Address in Shakerley Ward Reform UK GOULDING David Michael Address in Lymm North & Thelwall Ward Labour and Co-operative KEANE Party 4. The Poll for the above election is to be taken together with the poll for the election of Councillors to Halton Borough Council, Parish Councillors and the election of Combined Authority Mayor. The Poll for the above election is to be taken together with the poll for the election of Councillors to Warrington Borough Council and Parish Councillors to Parishes within Warrington Borough Council. The poll for the above is to be taken together with the poll for borough by-elections in Frodsham and Neston wards, by-elections for the Town and Parish Councils of Malpas, Moulton and Frodsham – Frodsham Waterside ward, and Neighbourhood Planning Referendums for the areas of Clotton Hoofield, Darnhall and Utkinton & Cotebrook within Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council. The poll for the above is to be taken together with the poll for a borough by-election in Crewe West Ward, by- elections for the Town and Parish Councils of Bollington, Crewe, Handforth, Knutsford, Macclesfield, Middlewich and Wilmslow, and Neighbourhood Planning Referendums for the areas of Alderley Edge, Eaton, Gawsworth, Hankelow, Peover Superior and Shavington-cum-Gresty within Cheshire East Borough Council.
    [Show full text]
  • DECISION NOTICE Notice Is Given That the Following Decision Has Been Taken Under the Provisions Set out in the Council’S Constitution
    DECISION NOTICE Notice is given that the following decision has been taken under the Provisions set out in the Council’s Constitution Decision maker: Cabinet Member for Strategic Outcomes Date: 21 July 2014 Decision in the Allocation of War Memorial Grants matter of: Decision: That the following War Memorial Grants be conditionally awarded or declined as indicated: Bickerton Joint Burial Committee Awarded £475 Bollington War Memorial Fund Awarded £5,500 Burleydam Village Hall Fund Awarded on receipt of suitable quotes Goostrey Parish Council Awarded £892 Haslington Parish Council Awarded £2,620 Minshull Vernon & District Parish Council Awarded £2,500 Mobberley Parish Council Awarded £2,500 Peover Superior Parish Council Awarded £3,780 Rainow Parish Council Awarded £2,500 St John’s Church, Chelford Awarded £2,500 The Royal British Legion – Holmes Chapel Branch Awarded £420 Background: Cheshire East Council has received various applications for war memorial grants to be considered in line with the Council’s Policy for the Allocation of War Memorial Grants. Each grant application is outlined in the report, as is the reason for the recommendation in respect of that application. All of the proposed grants can be funded from within existing budgets approved as part of the Council’s Budget for 2014/15. The aim of the grants is to assist the funding of the repair and refurbishment of First World War memorials across the Borough in order to commemorate the anniversary of the start and end of the First World War. In repairing and refurbishing these important community monuments, it is anticipated that there will be increased local community involvement and additional events planned around these monuments.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Pride Awards
    Queens House Annexe CHTSHIRE Queens Road CSMMUNITY Chester CH1 3BQ ACTION t' 01244 4A0222 t'. 01244 329777 e; enqu iries@chesh ireaction. org. uk $upportlng Gur Rura! Conrurunities www. cheshireaction. org. uk October 2015 TO ALL COVPETffION ENIRAITITS Thank you for entering the 2016 Community Prirle Competition and I now enclose the final results. I also enclose the mark and comment sheets. The judges commended all the entries and in each section, from top to bottom, the marts were extrcmely dose. They feelthat standards are improving every year. Thank you also for supporting the other Communig Pride Competitions. The Little Gem Award mntinues to be ppular. I hope you will enter the competition again next year and do remember that the Council can always hand the actualwork of the competltion to cilher interested groups in the area, who can oversee your entry. It is most helpful if the Council can take the decision to enter in advance, so that when the entry forns come out in Januarythey can be prrcssed promptly. The mmpetition is an ideal rrray to encourage communities to work together and provides an incentive furthem to help to improvetheir localenvironment and quality of life in theirvillage ortown. The success of the competition relies on your support and we do hope you will continue to enter the competition nextyear. Yours faithfully, EL)-,%Y2 Sylvia Batty Com munity Pride Coordinator s ESSApir* ffi Registered Charity: 1074676 |Company No: 3555199 I Reg. in England and Wales Registered office: Queens House Annexe, Queens Road, Chester CH1 3BQ Registered name: Cheshire Community Council 16 cHESHTRT IEC coumuxrry ft} AcrloN 16 COMMUNITY PRIDE COMPETIT FINAL PLACINGS 10.001 - 30.000 601 .
    [Show full text]
  • Peover Superior Parish Council Publication of the Peover Superior
    Peover Superior Parish Council Publication of the Peover Superior Neighbourhood Plan (Pre-Submission Version) The Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (Regulation 14) Peover Superior Parish Council, as the qualifying body, has prepared a Neighbourhood Plan for the period to 2030 (the Plan) for Peover Superior Parish with the help of the local community. The Plan sets out a vision for the future of the parish and planning policies which will be used to determine planning proposals locally. Peover Superior Parish Council is now inviting comments on the proposals in this Pre-Submission version of the Plan before it is submitted to Cheshire East Council for formal consideration and wider consultation. The consultation opens for comment on 19th August 2019. The deadline for comments to be received by Peover Superior Parish Council is 5pm on 30th September 2019. Printed copies of the Plan can be viewed at the following locations: Holmes Chapel Library, London Road, Holmes Chapel, CW4 7AP Knutsford Library, Toft Road, Knutsford, WA16 0PG An online version of the Plan can be viewed on the Neighbourhood Plan pages of the Peover Superior Parish Council website at: https://www.overpeover.com/nhp-documents/ How to make representations: a) Your comments will not be taken into account unless your Name and Postcode, Organisation or Body (if you are not an individual), are included. Additional information is optional, but will greatly assist us in analysing responses to the consultation. b) Please make additional separate representations if you are responding in different capacities. For example, you are an individual, but you are also an organisation or body or business, or you may be any other consultee type.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation 20 Representations Statement (Consultation Statement Part II) [ED 56A]
    Cheshire East Local Plan Site Allocations and Development Policies Document Regulation 20 Representations Statement (Consultation Statement Part II) [ED 56a] April 2021 Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 6 Purpose of this statement .................................................................................... 6 Background .......................................................................................................... 6 Structure of this statement ................................................................................... 7 2. SADPD preparation timeline ................................................................................ 8 A. Identify issues and collect evidence (2017) ..................................................... 8 B. First Draft SADPD (2018) ................................................................................ 8 C. Initial Publication Draft SADPD (2019) ............................................................ 9 D. Revised Publication Draft SADPD (2020) ....................................................... 9 E. Submission to the Secretary of State (2021) ................................................. 10 F. Examination and adoption ............................................................................. 10 3. Summary of process and main issues ............................................................... 11 Summary of the consultation process for the SADPD.......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire in the Dark Ages a Map Study of Celtic and Anglian Settlement
    CHESHIRE IN THE DARK AGES A MAP STUDY OF CELTIC AND ANGLIAN SETTLEMENT BY DOROTHY SYLVESTER, M.A., F.R.G.S. Read 20 September 1962 N the search for settlement origins in the Border counties, I the strength of the Celtic sub-structure becomes increasingly evident under the superficially convincing overlay of Anglo- Saxon place-names, as patterns of nucleation and dispersal, arable field systems and agrarian practice, and social and cultural arrangements emerge which show affinities with those across the Welsh Border. Despite the long duration of the Dark Ages, archaeological and historical evidence is still all too scanty, and an approach to many problems associated with this period must be made from other angles. In the Borderland, the opportunities for studying the reaction of Welsh and English and for investigating the earlier interrelationships of Celt and Angle are unique, for here from Cheshire down to Herefordshire and the lower Wye valley Celtic rule was maintained for almost two hundred years longer than in south-eastern England, and when the tide of Anglo-Saxon colonisation finally reached the area in the early seventh century, there is every reason to suppose that the Anglian immigration movement was relatively sparse. The geographical displacement of the earlier Celtic population may be assumed to have been correspondingly slight. The archaeology and written history of the period are fragmentary. By contrast place-name evidence, though it too offers tantalising gaps, has the merit of ubiquity. Yet the use to which it has been put in this part of the country has been limited principally to tracing the settlement areas of Angles and Scand­ inavians.
    [Show full text]