DOCSLIB.ORG

TALK to PR INTRODUCTION: Magandang Umaga/Hapon/Gabi Po

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TALK to PR INTRODUCTION: Magandang Umaga/Hapon/Gabi Po SWS 2014-12 – FINAL - 1 - PROJECT AB 06-14 (16-Jun-14; 4:14 PM) (PR-FILIPINO) TALK TO PR INTRODUCTION: Magandang umaga/hapon/gabi po. Ako si ___________ na taga Social Weather Stations (SWS). Nagsasagawa kami ng isang pag-aaral sa inyong lugar ngayon. Gumagawa kami ng pananaliksik sa mga pananaw ng mga mamayan ng Pilipinas tungkol sa kung paano pinapatakbo ang bansa at kung paano pinapamahalaan ang ekonomiya. Bawat tao na may 18 taong gulang o higit pa ay may pantay-pantay na pagkakataon upang makalahok sa pag-aaral na ito. Ang inyong bahay ay hindi sinasadyang napili. Nais naming sagutin ninyo ang mga tanong ayon sa inyong personal na pananaw. Ang interview ay tatagal ng mga 60 minuto. Hindi namin iuugnay ang inyong pangalan o alin mang pagkakakilanlan sa inyo sa inyong mga sagot. Kaya walang makakaalam kung ano man ang sinagot ninuman sa aming mga katanungan. Wala kayong ano mang dapat ikabahala sa pakikibahagi ninyo sa survey na ito. Wala din kayong benepisyo o pabuyang makukuha sa inyong pakikilahok sa survey na ito. Ngunit kung sasagutin niyo ang aming mga katanungan, matutulungan ninyo kaming maintindihan kung ano ang pakiramdam ng publiko tungkol sa mga issue na hinaharap ng ating bansa sa ngayon. Ang inyong pagsali sa pag-aaral na ito ay boluntaryo. Kung may mga katanungan na hindi ninyo gustong sagutin ang mga ito ay hindi ninyo kailangang sagutin. Maaari din kayong huminto sa pakikilahok sa survey na ito ano mang oras. Kung mayroon kayong mga katanungan tungkol sa pag-aaral na ito sa hinaharap, narito ang telepono ng tao sa aming opisina na maaari ninyong tawagan. Siya ang maaring sumagot sa inyong mga katanungan. Ang inyong tulong ay malugod naming tinatanggap. Handa na po ba kayong magsimulang sumagot sa aming mga katanunagn? Good morning/afternoon/evening. I am ___ from Social Weather Stations (SWS). We are conducting a public opinion survey in your area today. We are doing research on the views of citizens in the Philippines about how the country is governed and how the economy is managed. Every person over the age of 18 in our country has an equal chance of being included in this study. Your household has been chosen by chance. We would like you to answer questions about your personal views. The interview will take about 60 minutes. We will not record your name or any identifying information about you on the questionnaire. So no one will know who gave which answers to our questions. There is no risk to you in participating in the survey. There is also no benefit to you in participating in the survey. But if you answer our questions, you will help us understand how the public feels about issues facing the country today. Your participation in the survey is voluntary. If there are any questions you don't want to answer you don't have to answer them. And you can stop participating in the survey at any time. If you have any questions about the survey in the future, here is a card with the phone number of a person whom you can call at our organization's headquarters. He/she can answer any questions that you might have. Your assistance will be very much appreciated. Are you willing to start answering our questions? A. ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS 1. Paano ninyo gagraduhan ang kabuuang ekonomiya ng ating NAPAKABUTI (Very good) ....................................................... 1 bansa sa kasalukuyan? Ito po ba ay … (SHOW CARD)? MABUTI (Good) ........................................................................ 2 How would you rate the overall economic condition of our PUWEDE NA (HINDI MABUTI/HINDI MASAMA) country today? Is it … (SHOW CARD)? (So-so [not good nor bad]) ..................................................... 3 MASAMA (Bad) ....................................................................... 4 NAPAKASAMA (Very bad) ....................................................... 5 HINDI MAKAPILI (Can’t choose)................................................ 8 TUMANGGING SUMAGOT (Decline to answer) ....................... 9 2. Paano ninyo ilalarawan ang naging pagbabago sa TALAGANG MAS MABUTI (Much better) ................................ 1 ekonomiya ng ating bansa nitong nakaraang ilang taon? Ito MAS MABUTI NANG KAUNTI (A little better) .......................... 2 ba ay naging … (SHOW CARD)? HALOS PAREHO LANG (About the same) .............................. 3 How would you describe the change in the economic MAS MASAMA NANG KAUNTI (A little worse) ........................ 4 condition of our country over the last few years? Is it … (SHOW CARD)? TALAGANG MAS MASAMA (Much worse) .............................. 5 HINDI MAKAPILI (Can’t choose)................................................ 8 TUMANGGING SUMAGOT (Decline to answer) ....................... 9 3. Ano sa palagay ninyo ang magiging kalagayan ng TALAGANG MAS MABUTI (Much better) ................................ 1 ekonomiya ng ating bansa sa darating na ilang taon? Ito ba MAS MABUTI NANG KAUNTI (A little better) ........................... 2 ay magiging … (SHOW CARD)? HALOS PAREHO LANG (About the same) .............................. 3 What do you think will be the state of our country’s MAS MASAMA NANG KAUNTI (A little worse) ........................ 4 economic condition a few years from now? Will it be … (SHOW CARD) TALAGANG MAS MASAMA (Much worse) .............................. 5 HINDI MAKAPILI (Can’t choose)................................................ 8 TUMANGGING SUMAGOT (Decline to answer) ....................... 9 e:\0.東亞工作資料夾 all\asian baromoter\wave 4 survey\philippines\questionnaire\2014-06-16\ab wave 4 philippines main questionnaire (filipino) as of june 16.docx//16-Jun-14 SWS 2014-12 – FINAL - 2 - PROJECT AB 06-14 (16-Jun-14; 4:14 PM) (PR-FILIPINO) SWS 2014-12 – FINAL - 3 - PROJECT AB 06-14 (16-Jun-14; 4:14 PM) (PR-FILIPINO) A. ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS (CONT’D) 4. Sa inyo naman pong pamilya, paano ninyo gagraduhan ang NAPAKABUTI (Very good) ....................................................... 1 kalagayang pang-ekonomiya ng inyong pamilya sa MABUTI (Good) ........................................................................ 2 kasalukuyan? Ito po ba ay … (SHOW CARD)? PUWEDE NA (HINDI MABUTI/HINDI MASAMA) As for your own family, how do you rate the economic (So-so [not good nor bad]) ..................................................... 3 situation of your family today? Is it … (SHOW CARD)? MASAMA (Bad) ...................................................................... 4 NAPAKASAMA (Very bad) ....................................................... 5 HINDI MAKAPILI (Can’t choose)................................................ 8 TUMANGGING SUMAGOT (Decline to answer) ....................... 9 5. Paano ninyo po ikukumpara ang kasalukuyang kalagayang TALAGANG MAS MABUTI NGAYON (Much better pang-ekonomiya ng inyong pamilya sa nakalipas na ilang now) ..................................................................................... 1 taon? Ito po ba ay… (SHOW CARD)? MAS MABUTI NANG KAUNTI NGAYON (A little How would you compare the current economic condition of better now) ........................................................................... 2 your family with what it was a few years ago? Is it … HALOS PAREHO LANG (About the same) .............................. 3 (SHOW CARD)? MAS MASAMA NANG KAUNTI NGAYON (A little worse now) ........................................................................... 4 TALAGANG MAS MASAMA NGAYON (Much worse now) ..................................................................................... 5 HINDI MAKAPILI (Can’t choose)................................................ 8 TUMANGGING SUMAGOT (Decline to answer) ....................... 9 6. Ano po sa palagay ninyo ang magiging kalagayang pang- TALAGANG MAS MABUTI (Much better) ................................ 1 ekonomiya ng inyong pamilya ilang taon mula ngayon? Ito MAS MABUTI NG KAUNTI (A little better) ............................... 2 po ba ay… (SHOW CARD)? HALOS PAREHO LANG (About the same) .............................. 3 What do you think of the economic situation of your family MAS MASAMA NANG KAUNTI (A little worse) ........................ 4 will be a few years from now? Will it be … (SHOW CARD)? TALAGANG MAS MASAMA (Much worse) .............................. 5 HINDI MAKAPILI (Can’t choose)................................................ 8 TUMANGGING SUMAGOT (Decline to answer) ....................... 9 SWS 2014-12 – FINAL - 4 - PROJECT AB 06-14 (16-Jun-14; 4:14 PM) (PR-FILIPINO) B. TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS 7-19. MAY BABANGGITIN PO AKONG ILANG MGA INSTITUSYON. SA BAWAT ISA, PAKISABI LANG PO KUNG GAANO KALAKI ANG PAGTITIWALA NINYO SA KANILA. ITO BA AY NAPAKALAKING PAGTITIWALA, MEDYO MALAKING PAGTITIWALA, HINDI GAANONG PAGTITIWALA O TALAGANG WALANG PAGTITIWALA? I’m going to name a number of institutions. For each one, please tell me how much trust you have in them. Is it A GREAT DEAL OF TRUST, QUITE A LOT OF TRUST, NOT VERY MUCH TRUST, or NONE AT ALL? Medyo Hindi Talagang (SHOW CARDS) Napakalaki HMT HM TS malaki gaano wala 7. ANG PANGULO (The President) 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 8. ANG MGA KORTE (The courts) 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 9. ANG GOBYERNONG NASYONAL SA MAYNILA 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 (The national government in Manila) 10. MGA PARTIDO PULITIKAL 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 (Political parties [not any specific party]) 11. MATAAS AT MABABANG KAPULUNGAN NG KONGRESO (Parliament) 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 12. SERBISYO SIBIL (Civil Service) 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 13. ANG MILITAR (The military) 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 14. ANG PULISYA (The police) 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 15. LOKAL NA PAMAHALAAN (Local government) 1 2 3 4 7 8 9
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Senatorial Candidates 2016
    SENATORIAL CANDIDATES 2016 POST NAME PARTY NAME IN BALLOT Senator Albani, Ibrahim Independent Albani, Shariff (IND) Senator Ali, Alexander Alimmudin Partido ng Manggagawa at Ali, Aldin (WPPPMM) Magsasaka Senator Alunan, Rafael III Independent Alunan, Raffy (IND) Senator Ambolodto, Nariman Liberal Party Ambolodto, Ina (LP) Senator Aquino, Antonio Independent Aquino, Tonyboy (IND) Senator Arquiza, Godofredo Independent Arquiza, Godofredo (IND) Senator Baligod, Levito Independent Baligod, Levito (IND) Senator Belgica, Greco Antonious Independent Belgica, Greco (IND) Beda Senator Bello, Walden Independent Bello, Walden (IND) Senator Cam, Sandra Pwersa ng Masang Pilipino Cam, Sandra (PMP) Senator Catmon, Joel Philippine Green Republican Catmon, Joel (PGRP) Party Senator Chavez, Melchor Partido ng Manggagawa at Chavez, Mel (WPPPMM) Magsasaka Senator Colmenares, Neri Makabayan Colmenares, Neri (MKBYN) Senator De Lima, Leila Norma Liberal Party De Lima, Leila (LP) Eulalia Josefa Senator Domagoso, Francisco Pwersa ng Masang Pilipino Domagoso, Isko Moreno (PMP) Senator Dorona, Ray Independent Dorona, Ray (IND) Senator Drilon, Franklin Liberal Party Drilon, Frank (LP) Senator Gadon, Lorenzo Kilusang Bagong Lipunan Gadon, Larry (KBL) Senator Gatchalian, Sherwin Nationalist People's Coalition Gatchalian, Win (NPC) Senator Gordon, Richard Independent Gordon, Dick (IND) Senator Guingona, Teofisto III Liberal Party Guingona, TG (LP) Senator Hontiveros, Ana Theresia Akbayan Hontiveros, Risa (AKBYN) Senator Jaafar, Jay Angelique Independent Jaafar, Princess Angel (IND) Senator Kabalu, Mustapha Independent Kabalu, Eid (IND) Senator Kapunan, Lorna Aksyon Demokratiko Kapunan, Atty. Lorna (AKSYON) Senator Kiram, Princess Jacel United Nationalist Alliance Kiram, Princess Jacel (UNA) Senator Lacsamana, Venesa United Nationalist Alliance Lacsamana, Alma Moreno (UNA) Senator Lacson, Panfilo Independent Lacson, Panfilo (IND) Senator Lagare, Sixto Independent Lagare, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSP Background Variable Documentation in the Philippines
    1 ISSP Background Variable Documentation in the Philippines ISSP 2005 Module on Work Orientations III SEX - Sex of respondent National Language English Translation Question no. ISSP1/Sex. Gender of PR ISSP1/Sex. Gender of PR and text Codes/ 1 Male 1 Male Categories 2 Female 2 Female Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: Country Variable Codes (in translation) SEX 1. Male 1. Male 2. Female 2. Female -not used- 9. No answer, refused Documentation for ISSP background variables © ZA/ZUMA-GESIS 2 AGE - Age of respondent National Language English Translation Question no. ISSP2/AGE. Actual Age ISSP2/AGE. Actual Age and text Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: (list lowest, highest, and ‘missing’ codes only, replace terms in [square brackets] with real numbers) Country Variable Codes/Construction Rules AGE Construction Codes 18 years old [18] 89 years old [89] 97. No answer, 99. Refused 99. No answer, refused Optional: Recoding Syntax Documentation for ISSP background variables © ZA/ZUMA-GESIS 3 MARITAL - R: Marital status National Language English Translation Question no. ISSP3. Marital Status of PR ISSP3. Marital Status of PR and text 1 May asawa 1 Married 2 Balo 2 Widowed 3 Diborsyado 3 Divorced Codes/ 4 Hiwalay 4 Separated/Married but separated/ not Categories living with legal spouse 5 Walang asawa 5 Single/never married 9 No answer 9 No answer Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: Country Variable Codes/Construction Rules Marital 1. Married 1. Married, living with legal spouse 2. Widowed 2. Widowed 3. Divorced 3. Divorced 4. Separated/Married but separated/ not living with 4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Transaction Cost Approach to Explain Public Sector Innovation in Secondary Cities of Indonesia and the Philippines
    INNOVATIVE CITY GOVERNMENTS: A TRANSACTION COST APPROACH TO EXPLAIN PUBLIC INNOVATION IN MID-SIZED CITIES OF INDONESIA AND THE PHILIPPINES MULYA AMRI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2015 INNOVATIVE CITY GOVERNMENTS: A TRANSACTION COST APPROACH TO EXPLAIN PUBLIC INNOVATION IN MID-SIZED CITIES OF INDONESIA AND THE PHILIPPINES MULYA AMRI (M.A., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY LEE KUAN YEW SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2015 DECLARATION I hereby declare that the thesis is my original work and it has been written by me in its entirety. I have duly acknowledged all the sources of information which have been used in the thesis. This thesis has also not been submitted for any degree in any university previously. Mulya Amri 12 November 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have received substantial inputs, support, and inspiration for developing and completing this thesis. My thesis supervisor, Associate Professor Eduardo Araral, structured my interest in institutional analysis and guided me to think strategically about my research questions, the topics that I intend to explore, and the career that I would like to have as a scholar. He also pointed me towards excellent opportunities. My thesis committee members: (1) Assistant Professor Ora-orn Poocharoen helped me through my early years as a Ph.D student and heightened my appreciation of public management, (2) Assistant Professor Yumin Joo made sure I remain engaged in and informed by the literature on urban studies. Professor Susan Fainstein guided me through my topical qualifying exam on urban development and helped me think critically about city competitiveness and innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3
    COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines, March 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Philippines, March 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: PHILIPPINES March 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of the Philippines (Republika ng Pilipinas). Short Form: Philippines (Pilipinas). Term for Citizen(s): Filipino(s). Capital: Manila. Click to Enlarge Image Major Cities: Located on Luzon Island, Metropolitan Manila, including the adjacent Quezon City and surrounding suburbs, is the largest city in the Philippines, with about 12 million people, or nearly 14 percent of the total population. Other large cities include Cebu City on Cebu Island and Davao City on Mindanao Island. Independence: The Philippines attained independence from Spain on June 12, 1898, and from the United States on July 4, 1946. Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1), Holy Thursday (also called Maundy Thursday, movable date in March or April), Good Friday (movable date in March or April), Araw ng Kagitingan (Day of Valor, commonly called Bataan Day outside of the Philippines, April 9), Labor Day (May 1), Independence Day (June 12), National Heroes Day (last Sunday of August), Bonifacio Day (celebration of the birthday of Andres Bonifacio, November 30), Eid al Fitr (the last day of Ramadan, movable date), Christmas Day (December 25), Rizal Day (the date of the execution by the Spanish of José Rizal in 1896, December 30). Flag: The flag of the Philippines has two equal horizontal bands of blue (top) and red with a white equilateral triangle based on the hoist side; in the center of the triangle is a yellow sun with eight primary rays (each containing three individual rays), and in each corner of the triangle is Click to Enlarge Image a small yellow five-pointed star.
    [Show full text]
  • Genuine Opposition Party – Team Unity Party – United Opposition Party
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: PHL32818 Country: Philippines Date: 23 January 2008 Keywords: Philippines – Genuine Opposition party – Team Unity party – United Opposition party This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Please provide background information on the ‘Genuine Opposition Party’, including what level of government it operates at, when it was formed, it’s main aims, and prominent people within the party. 2. Please provide background information on the ‘Team Unity Party’, including what level of government it operates at, when it was formed, it’s main aims, and prominent people within the party. 3. Please provide any other relevant information. RESPONSE Introduction Information was found to indicate that the Genuine Opposition and TEAM Unity were political coalitions organised in the context of the May 2007 Philippine elections. No information was found to indicate that either coalition was registered as a political party in the Philippines. Information is provided regarding the Genuine Opposition and TEAM Unity in response to Question 1 and Question 2. An overview of recent sources which contend that political parties in the Philippines are characterised by a lack of institutionalisation is provided in response to Question 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuity and Discontinuity of Party System
    Continuity and Discontinuity of Party System Institutionalization in Japan, Taiwan, Philippines, and South Korea. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the University of Canterbury by Koochul (K.C) Jung 2018 Acknowledgements I am extremely grateful for all the support I have received over the last few years of my life. Much of what I have learned, along with my professional and personal growth could not have been possible without the people. I am in deep debt to my academic supervisors, Alexander C. Tan and James S. Ockey, who have played an important role in my development as a researcher and scholar. I am extremely grateful to Alexander Tan for his compelling criticisms and suggestions. I am grateful to James S. Ockey for his genuine interest and comments. Numerous readers and presentation questions helped me refine my arguments. Andrea Chole Wong, Dennis Quilala, Peter Neowkeke, Suthikarn Meechan, I would like to extend my thanks and gratitude for helping me along the way. Andrea Chloe Wong, Ossy, Dennis Quilala, Farid Idris, and Jack and Pascale Hatcher, thank you all so much for sharing the process and for making it brighter along the way. Thank you also for the friendship and care, for always having an encouraging word and/or for more dedicated comments and reviews of the chapters of my thesis. To my father and mother, thank you for everything you have done. I could not have done this without your endless supports. Finally, thanks and praise to you God Almighty who have chosen me and trained me through this ordeal.
    [Show full text]
  • MINDANAO (ARMM) ______5Th – 17Th May, 2007 (Election Was on 14Th May, 2007)
    ANFREL OBSERVATION OF THE 2007 PHILIPPINE NATIONAL ELECTION IN THE AUTONOMOUS REGION OF MUSLIM MINDANAO (ARMM) _____________________________________________________ 5th – 17th May, 2007 (Election was on 14th May, 2007) Tribal leader Bong Cawed casted his vote on midterm elections in the hope that winning candidates will also give priority to the plight of the indigenous people nationwide 1 TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT .......................................................................................................... 2 ABBRIVATION ...................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ...................................................................................................... 4 Mindanao Map ........................................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 6 LIPINOS WAY OF VOTING ................................................................................................ 7 ElectionS in Mindanao............................................................................................................ 9 ANFREL/TAF MISSION IN ARMM, 6 PROVINCES ...................................................... 9 SECURITY ............................................................................................................................ 11 1. PRE-ELECTION
    [Show full text]
  • Infusing Reform in Elections
    INFUSING REFORM IN ELECTIONS The Partisan Electoral Engagement of Reform Movements in Post-Martial Law Philippines Ateneo School of Government (ASoG) Paciico Ortiz Hall Fr. Arrupe Road, Social Development Complex Ateneo de Manila University Campus Katipunan Avenue, Loyola Heights Quezon City 1108 Telefax : (632) 920-29-20 Local line : (632) 426-60-01 local 4644 Email : [email protected] Website : www.asg.ateneo.edu Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) Philippine Ofice Unit 2601, Discovery Centre #25 ADB Avenue, Ortigas Center Pasig City 1600 Tel : (632) 637-71-86 | (632) 634-69-19 Fax : (632) 632-0697 Website : www.fes.org.ph Printed and bound in the Philippines INFUSING REFORM IN ELECTIONS The Partisan Electoral Engagement of Reform Movements in Post-Martial Law Philippines JOY ACERON Case Writers RAFAELA MAE DAVID GLENFORD LEONILLO VALERIE BUENAVENTURA POLITICAL DEMOCRACY AND REFORM (PODER) Infusing Reform in Elections The Partisan Electoral Engagement of Reform Movements in Post-Martial Law Philippines © 2012 Ateneo School of Government (ASoG) Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) Philippine Ofice The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of ASoG and FES. ISBN: 978-971-92495-8-0 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Photos, news clippings, video grabs, newspaper and Internet stories used are copyright of their authors
    [Show full text]
  • CSESII Parties and Leaders Original CSES Text Plus CCNER Additions (Highlighted)
    CSESII Parties and Leaders Original CSES text plus CCNER additions (highlighted) =========================================================================== ))) APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS =========================================================================== | NOTES: PARTIES AND LEADERS | | This appendix identifies parties active during a polity's | election and (where available) their leaders. | | Provided are the party labels for the codes used in the micro | data variables. Parties A through F are the six most popular | parties, listed in descending order according to their share of | the popular vote in the "lowest" level election held (i.e., | wherever possible, the first segment of the lower house). | | Note that in countries represented with more than a single | election study the order of parties may change between the two | elections. | | Leaders A through F are the corresponding party leaders or | presidential candidates referred to in the micro data items. | This appendix reports these names and party affiliations. | | Parties G, H, and I are supplemental parties and leaders | voluntarily provided by some election studies. However, these | are in no particular order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: ALBANIA (2005) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 02. Party A PD Democratic Party Sali Berisha 01. Party B PS Socialist Party Fatos Nano 04. Party C PR Republican Party Fatmir Mediu 05. Party D PSD Social Democratic Party Skender Gjinushi 03. Party E LSI Socialist Movement for Integration Ilir Meta 10. Party F PDR New Democratic Party Genc Pollo 09. Party G PAA Agrarian Party Lufter Xhuveli 08. Party H PAD Democratic Alliance Party Neritan Ceka 07. Party I PDK Christian Democratic Party Nikolle Lesi 06. LZhK Movement of Leka Zogu I Leka Zogu 11. PBDNj Human Rights Union Party 12. Union for Victory (Partia Demokratike+ PR+PLL+PBK+PBL) 89.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays in Political Economy and Governance: Lessons from the Philippines
    Essays in Political Economy and Governance: Lessons from the Philippines by Nico M. Ravanilla A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Public Policy and Political Science) in The University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Allen Hicken, Co-Chair Professor Dean Yang, Co-Chair Professor Anna Grzymala-Busse Professor Arthur Lupia c Nico M. Ravanilla 2015 All Rights Reserved To the Filipino Statesman ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS For encouragement and instruction, I thank Allen Hicken and Dean Yang. For her acumen, Anna Grzymala-Busse. For the challenge and inspiration, Skip Lupia. For seeing me through the bureaucratic maze of graduate school, Mim Jones, Michelle Spornhauer and Julie Haynes at the Ford School of Public Policy, and Elise Bodei and Kathryn Cardenas at the Department of Political Science. For showing me the frontiers of comparative politics and methodology, Rob Franzese Jr., Jenna Bednar, George Tsebelis, and Brian Min. For the pleasures of scholarly conversations and collaborations, Pablo Querubin, Michael Davidson, John V.C. Nye, Desiree Desierto, Caroline Theoharides, Bill Clark, Kenneth Mori McElwain, Jennifer Frentasia, Mark Dincecco, and Nahomi Ichino. For my first ticket to higher studies in the United States, the Fulbright Program. For community and fellowship, the Southeast Asia Research Group (SEAREG). For the fun-filled office environment, Amy Pond and Hakeem Jefferson. For the joys of fieldwork, the staff of Innovations for Poverty Action - Philippines. For life-long friendships forged in graduate school, Vanessa Alviarez and Vichet In. For bearing the yoke with me, and for reminding me of the unum necessarium, my brothers in the Servants of the Word.
    [Show full text]
  • Nacionalista Party
    ATTITUDESATTITUDES TOWARDTOWARD POLITICALPOLITICAL PARTIESPARTIES ININ THETHE PHILIPPINESPHILIPPINES ATENEO SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT With the support of The KONRAD ADENAUER STIFTUNG TheThe 4th4th QuarterQuarter 20062006 SocialSocial WeatherWeather SurveySurvey Fieldwork Sample Error Dates Sizes Margins PHILIPPINES : Nov 24-29 1,200 ± 3 Metro Manila : Nov 24-28 300 ± 6 Balance Luzon : Nov 24-28 300 ± 6 Visayas : Nov 24-28 300 ± 6 Mindanao : Nov 24-29 300 ± 6 Fourth Quarter 2006 Social Weather Report November 24-29, 2006 National Survey 2 SurveySurvey ModuleModule R. AWARENESS/TRUST RATING OF GROUPS/INSTITUTIONS PAG-USAPAN PO NATIN ANG TUNGKOL SA ILANG GRUPO O INSTITUSYON. SA MGA SUMUSUNOD, MAAARI PO BANG SABIHIN NINYO KUNG ANG PAGTITIWALA NINYO KAY (GRUPO/INSTITUSYON) AY NAPAKALAKI, MEDYO MALAKI, HINDI TIYAK KUNG MALAKI O MALIIT, MEDYO MALIIT, NAPAKALIIT, O WALA PA KAYONG NARINIG O NABASA KAHIT NA KAILAN TUNGKOL KAY (NAME)? PAKISABI ANG SAGOT NINYO SA PAMAMAGITAN NG PAGLAGAY NG MGA KARD SA NAAANGKOP NA LUGAR SA RATING BOARD NA ITO. Let’s now talk about some groups/institutions. For the following, please indicate if your trust/faith in (GROUP/INSTITUTION) is VERY MUCH (VM), SOMEWHAT MUCH (SM), UNDECIDED IF MUCH OR LITTLE (U), SOMEWHAT LITTLE (SL), VERY LITTLE (VL), or YOU HAVE NOT HEARD OR READ ANYTHING ABOUT (NAME) (NA = Not Aware) ever? You may indicate your answers by placing each card on the appropriate box on this rating board. VM SM U SL VL DK NA R NET 87. LAKAS-NUCD-UMDP 9% 29% 30% 11% 12% 8% 13% 1% +16 DK = Don’t Know; R = Refused to Answer; NET = VM + SM - SL - VL Fourth Quarter 2006 Social Weather Report November 24-29, 2006 National Survey 3 Y.
    [Show full text]