DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Municipality of Waterloo Ecological and Environmental Advisory Committee Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Municipality of Waterloo Ecological and Environmental Advisory Committee Agenda Media Release: Friday, March 23, 2018, 4:30 p.m. Regional Municipality of Waterloo Ecological and Environmental Advisory Committee Agenda Monday, March 26, 2018 Dinner: 5:30 p.m. Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Room 110 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, Ontario 1. Election of Chair and Vice Chair for 2018 2. Introduction of New Members: Don Drackley, Garrett Gauthier, Ken Hough, Daniel Marshall 3. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest under the “Municipal Conflict of Interest Act” 4. Approval of Minutes - December 18, 2017 Page 3 5. Delegations/Reports 5.1 Community Climate Adaptation Planning i. David Roewade, Sustainability Specialist and Nicholas Cloet, Climate Change Coordinator, Region of Waterloo Community Planning 5.2 EEAC-18-001, Tri-City Lands Limited Germet Pit Extension, St. Agatha Forest Environmentally Sensitive Policy Area (ESPA 15) Page 6 Should you require an alternative format please contact the Regional Clerk at Tel.: 519-575-4400, TTY: 519-575-4605, or [email protected] 2685270 EEAC Agenda - 2 - 18/03/26 i. Rick Esbaugh, Tri-City Lands Ltd., Brett Woodman, NRSI and Stan Denoed, Harden Environmental 5.3 EEAC-18-002, Long-Term Target for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions in Waterloo Region Page 16 i. Kate Daley, Climate Action Waterloo Region 5.4 EEAC-18-003, Proposed CRH/Dufferin Aggregates Chudyk Pit, ESPA 53 (Alps Woods), Dumfries Carolinian Environmentally Sensitive Landscape, Township of North Dumfries Page 19 i. Brian Zeman, MHBC Planning and Ken Zimmerman, CRH/Dufferin Aggregates 6. Information/Correspondence 6.1 Cedar Creek Subwatershed Study – Public Consultation Centre #1, April 25, 2018, North Dumfries Community Complex 6.2 Regional Comments on Proposed Study Area for Greenbelt Expansion i. PDL-CPL-18-07, Protecting Water for Future Generations Growing the Greenbelt in the Outer Ring Page 25 6.3 Final Provincial Natural Heritage System Mapping for the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 6.4 Kitchener Urban Forest Strategy – Upcoming Consultation 7. Other Business 8. Active EEAC Subcommittees Page 37 9. Next Meeting – April 30, 2018 10. Adjourn 2685270 3 Regional Municipality of Waterloo Ecological and Environmental Advisory Committee Minutes Monday, December 18, 2017 4:30 p.m. Room 110 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, Ontario Present were: Chair A. Featherstone, W. Caston, A. Dean, , G. Michalenko, J. Nowak, C. Priddle, S. Ramsay, N. Semper, C. Weatherall, and A. Woroch Members absent: R. Donaldson, L. Ehnes, J. Kimantas, J. Kingsbury Declarations of Pecuniary Interest Under The Municipal Conflict of Interest Act None declared. Minutes Moved by J. Nowak Seconded by G. Michalenko That the minutes of the Ecological and Environmental Advisory Committee of June 27, 2017 be approved. Carried Delegations a) Kate Daley, Climate Action Waterloo Region appeared before the Committee and provided a presentation about a proposed long term greenhouse gas emissions reduction target. Ms. Daley also asked for the Committee’s support for a reduction target of 80% below 2010 emissions levels. 2588722 4 EEAC Minutes - 2 - 17/12/18 G. Michalenko asked if striving for a 100% reduction target would make it more likely that an 80% reduction target would be achieved. K. Daley responded that the target should be realistic and express what should be achieved. J. Nowak asked about the nature of the question when asking people what kind of emissions reduction target citizens wanted to achieve. K. Daley responded that they asked people “how much change to do you want to see?” and that most people believe that something needs to be done to curb emissions. G. Michalenko suggested that carbon sequestration and tree planting be considered as part of the plan. K. Daley acknowledged this comment and that these items may be part of the plan moving forward. A. Woroch suggested that shorter term targets also be looked at in addition to a long term target. K. Daley responded that interim targets will likely be included in the comprehensive plan. S. Ramsay suggested that more detail be provided to explain to people the implications of an 80% reduction target. K. Daley acknowledged this comment. Moved by C. Weatherall Seconded by A. Woroch That the Ecological and Environmental Advisory Committee strike a sub-committee to review the information provided by Climate Action Waterloo Region and report back to the Committee with recommendations. Carried C. Weatherall, A. Woroch and J. Nowak volunteered to sit on the subcommittee. Information/Correspondence a) East Side Lands, Stage 2, Master Environmental Servicing Plan (Phase 2) was received for information. b) Cedar Creek Subwatershed Study was received for information. c) Regional Comments on Growth Plan for the Great Golden Horseshoe Proposed Natural Heritage System was received for information. d) EEAC and LCH ESL Appointments for 2018 e) Regional Forests was received for information. 2588722 5 EEAC Minutes - 3 - 17/12/18 Other Business Chair A. Featherstone thanked outgoing members G. Michalenko, C. Priddle, L. Ehnes and J. Kimantas for their service on the Committee and wished them all the best in their future endeavors. J. Nowak informed the Committee that the Community Environmental Stewardship Fund was approved $150,000 in the Region’s operating budget. Active EEAC Subcommittees Staff gave a brief update on the progress and status of active EEAC subcommittees. Next Meeting – January 29, 2018 Adjourn Moved by C. Weatherall Seconded by A. Dean That the meeting adjourn at 6:10 p.m. Carried Committee Chair, A. Featherstone Committee Clerk, E. Flewwelling 2588722 6 Report: EEAC-18-001 Region of Waterloo Planning, Development & Legislative Services Community Planning To: Chair and Members of the Ecological and Environmental Advisory Committee Date: March 26, 2018 File Code: D04-20/015/DA Subject: Tri-City Lands Limited Germet Pit Extension, St. Agatha Forest Environmentally Sensitive Policy Area (ESPA 15) Recommendation: That the Ecological and Environmental Advisory Committee provide the following advice to Community Planning staff with respect to the proposed zone change and aggregate licence for the Tri-City Germet Pit Extension at 2264 Snyder’s Road in the Township of Wilmot on lands contiguous to the St. Agatha Forest Environmentally Sensitive Policy Area (ESPA 15): 1. That the scoped Environmental Impact Statement and additional information provided by the applicant in support of the proposed zone change and aggregate licence application pursuant to Regional Official Plan (ROP) Policies 7.C.10 and 7.G.4(b) satisfactorily fulfills the Terms of Reference adopted on September 26, 2016, and that the Committee has no objection in principle to the approval of the required zone change application; 2. That the boundary of, and buffers to, the St. Agatha Forest Environmentally Sensitive Policy Area (ESPA 15) be interpreted as shown on Map 5 of the Natural Environment Level 1 & 2 Technical Report and Scoped EIS (NRSI, July 2017), reproduced as Attachment B to this report; 3. That only the proposed extraction area be re-zoned to permit aggregate extraction, and that ESPA 15 and the recommended buffers, shown on Attachment B, be re-zoned for environmental conservation pursuant to ROP Policy 7.A.2; 4. That the applicant consider developing a cycling trails plan, in consultation with 2676212 7 March 26, 2018 Report: EEAC-18-001 the Region and the Township, if any trails within the ESPA are proposed in the future. 5. Advise the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry that the applicant has satisfied the Committee’s comments with respect to the Site Plan of the proposed Germet Pit Extension Class A, Category 3 Pit Licence and that the Committee has no further objections, subject to the following: 5.1 That Note #1 under “Recommendations from Technical Reports: Scoped Environmental Impact Statement” on the Site Plan (Sheet 4 of 5) be removed as the note is no longer applicable due to revisions to the Rehabilitation Plan. 5.2 That biological and groundwater monitoring programs submitted by the applicant (Letter from IBI Group, February 26, 2018) be included as proposed on the Site Plan: i. Annual reporting of the hydrographs with comparison to established thresholds will be forwarded to MNRF upon request and submitted to the Region of Waterloo and the GRCA as part of the ARA – Compliance Assessment Report reporting. ii. The findings of biological monitoring components (including amphibian, significant wildlife habitat, natural feature buffer, and wetland monitoring) will be outlined in a brief summary report in years 1, 3 and 5 following the commencement of operations. If the year 5 report does not coincide with the final extraction of the pit, the licensee shall submit a subsequent report after final extraction has occurred but prior to the license being surrendered. The report will be submitted to the Region of Waterloo, Township of Wilmot, GRCA, and upon their request, to the MNRF. iii. The findings of the linkage feature monitoring will be outlined in a brief summary report in year 2 following the planting of the linkage feature. The report will be submitted to the Region of Waterloo, Township of Wilmot, GRCA, and upon their request, to the MNRF. Report: Tri-City Lands Limited is operating the Germet Pit at 2264 Snyder's Road in the Township of Wilmot (see Attachment A). The pit is located immediately south of and contiguous to the St. Agatha Forest Environmentally Sensitive Policy Area (ESPA 15). The pit was licensed many years ago, and the original zone change application was reviewed by EEAC (Report EEAC 9/91, dated April 24, 1991, and was supported on the recommendation of a sub-committee at the June 25, 1991 meeting). At the time, staff and the Committee were most concerned about the creation of an appropriate buffer to 2676212 8 March 26, 2018 Report: EEAC-18-001 the contiguous portions of the ESPA and the prevention of sedimentation into the wetland community at the northeastern corner of the property.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impacts of Event-Based Recharge on the Vulnerability of Public Supply Wells
    sustainability Review Impacts of Event-Based Recharge on the Vulnerability of Public Supply Wells Andrew J. Wiebe 1,* , David L. Rudolph 1, Ehsan Pasha 1,2, Jacqueline M. Brook 1,3, Mike Christie 1,4 and Paul G. Menkveld 1,5 1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; [email protected] (D.L.R.); [email protected] (E.P.); [email protected] (J.M.B.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (P.G.M.) 2 Les Services EXP Inc., Montréal, QC H1Z 4J2, Canada 3 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Kitchener, ON N2G 4Y9, Canada 4 Hamilton Water, Hamilton, ON L8R 2K3, Canada 5 Golder Associates Ltd., Cambridge, ON N1T 1A8, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-5198884567 Abstract: Dynamic recharge events related to extreme rainfall or snowmelt are becoming more common due to climate change. The vulnerability of public supply wells to water quality degradation may temporarily increase during these types of events. The Walkerton, ON, Canada, tragedy (2000) highlighted the threat to human health associated with the rapid transport of microbial pathogens to public supply wells during dynamic recharge events. Field research at the Thornton (Woodstock, ON, Canada) and Mannheim West (Kitchener, ON, Canada) well fields, situated in glacial overburden aquifers, identified a potential increase in vulnerability due to event-based recharge phenomena. Ephemeral surface water flow and local ponding containing microbial pathogen indicator species Citation: Wiebe, A.J.; Rudolph, D.L.; were observed and monitored within the capture zones of public supply wells following heavy rain Pasha, E.; Brook, J.M.; Christie, M.; and/or snowmelt.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Analysis and the Development of 3-D Geological Models for Regional Hydrogeological Applications
    Introduction - Basin Analysis and the Development of 3-D Geological Models for Regional Hydrogeological Applications Russell, H.1, R.C. Berg2, and L.H. Thorleifson3 1Geological Survey of Canada; 2Illinois State Geological Survey; 3Minnesota Geological Survey This workshop is the third in an ongoing series discussing three-dimensional (3-D) geological model construction for groundwater applications. A central theme of the workshops has been development of techniques for reconciling disparate archival and high quality data sets to produce the most robust 3-D stratigraphic and hydrostratigraphic models possible. The first workshop focused on the use of archival water well records for the development of 3-D models (Berg and Thorleifson, 2001). The second workshop considered the widespread use of water well data to address questions of broader basin methodologies, techniques for collecting high quality data, and the need for geostatistical techniques in data interpolation (Thorleifson and Berg, 2002). The value and pertinence of these workshops and the resultant interagency collaboration toward improved methodologies parallels recommendations by the National Research Council (NRC) (2000) for Investigating Groundwater Systems on Regional and National Scales. This NRC review highlights two important issues connecting geology and hydrogeology: $ Collaboration between scientists that permits geological information to be used in scaling up the results of a local groundwater study in areas where hydrogeological data are sparse or nonexistent. $ Characterization of heterogeneous aquifers at large and small scales through understanding links between geology and hydrogeology In the United States, the Regional Aquifer Simulation Assessment (RASA) studies are one example of a multi-agency approach to regional groundwater investigations (Sun and Johnson, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Management Plan for the Waterloo Moraine: a Comprehensive Assessment of Its Current State Within the Region of Waterloo
    Towards a Management Plan for the Waterloo Moraine: A Comprehensive Assessment of its Current State within the Region of Waterloo by Lindsay Poulin A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies in Geography Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2009 © Lindsay Poulin 2009 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. Lindsay Poulin ii ABSTRACT The Region of Waterloo (ROW) and Oxford County contain a significant landscape unit called the Waterloo Moraine that provides multiple ecological and water resource functions to surrounding communities. These functions include; providing a clean and abundant source of water, natural landscapes for plant and animal habitats, natural areas for recreational enjoyment, prime agricultural lands on which to grow food and aggregate resources in close proximity to large markets. This landscape unit is similar to the Oak Ridges Moraine (ORM) located in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). The purpose of this research is to conduct an examination of the current state of management for the Waterloo Moraine within the ROW and Oxford County. Attributes of the Waterloo Moraine examined include; water resources, agricultural resources, mineral aggregate resources, Environmentally Sensitive Landscapes (ESLs), natural core areas, natural linkage areas and settlement areas. While the hydrologic functions have been most studied within this landscape unit, the Moraine has predominantly been studied from a focused perspective rather than a comprehensive one.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand River Conservation Authority
    Grand River Conservation Authority Report number: GM-06-19-61 Date: June 28, 2019 To: Members of Grand River Conservation Authority Subject: Water Management Plan Reporting – Five years of implementation Recommendation: THAT Report Number GM-06-19-61 – Water Management Plan Reporting – Five years of implementation be received as information. Summary: Through a long-standing commitment to improve watershed water management, the Grand River Conservation Authority continues to support and coordinate a collaborative Water Management Plan with municipalities, government agencies, and First Nations. The GRCA role is to co-ordinate and facilitate this plan by collaborating with partners, hosting and organizing meetings and introducing new staff in partner agencies to the plan. The goals of the Plan are to 1. Reduce flood damage potential; 2. Ensure water supply for communities, economies and ecosystems; 3. Improve water quality to improve river health and reduce the river’s impact on Lake Erie; and 4. Increase resiliency to deal with a changing climate across the watershed. This Plan provides the framework from which partner agencies can align work plans to help realize greater outcomes for effective watershed water management. A fundamental outcome of the plan is to look for best value solutions to water management problems and issues in the watershed and to act as neutral party to assist with finding solutions. Report: Managing water resources in Ontario is a shared responsibility. The Water Management Plan provides the framework for collective and collaborative action on water management that transcends municipal boundaries. The goals of the Plan are to 1. Reduce flood damage potential; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Geology of the Guelph Area, Waterloo, Wellington, and Halton Counties; Ontario Department of Mines, Geological Branch, Open File Report 5008, 40P
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS PRODUCT Your use of this electronic information product (“EIP”), and the digital data files contained on it (the “Content”), is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By opening the EIP and viewing the Content , you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. EIP and Content: This EIP and Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry (MNDMF) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinions expressed are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the EIP and its Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDMF does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable or that the EIP is free from viruses or other harmful components. MNDMF is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the EIP or the Content. MNDMF assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the EIP or the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This EIP or the Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDMF. Linked Web sites may not be available in French.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Grand River Watershed an Overview of Bedrock and Quaternary Geological Interpretations in the Grand River Watershed
    Geology of the Grand River Watershed An Overview of Bedrock and Quaternary Geological Interpretations in the Grand River watershed Prepared by Bob Janzen, GIT December 2018 i Table of Contents List of Maps ..................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. iii 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Bedrock Geology .................................................................................................. 1 Algonquin Arch ......................................................................................................... 2 Bedrock Cuestas ...................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Bedrock Surface ................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Bedrock Formations of the Grand River watershed ........................................... 8 2.2.1 Queenston Formation ................................................................................ 15 2.2.2 Clinton–Cataract Group ............................................................................. 15 2.2.2.1 Whirlpool Formation ............................................................................ 16 2.2.2.2 Manitoulin Formation ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grand River Source Protection Area: Assessment Report
    Grand River Source Protection Area Approved Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ........................................................................ 2-5 2.1 Lake Erie Source Protection Region ........................................................... 2-5 2.2 Grand River Source Protection Area ........................................................... 2-5 2.3 Population, Population Density and Future Projections ............................... 2-6 2.4 Physiography ............................................................................................ 2-16 2.4.1 Dundalk Till Plain ....................................................................... 2-16 2.4.2 Stratford Till Plain ...................................................................... 2-16 2.4.3 Hillsburg Sandhills ..................................................................... 2-17 2.4.4 Guelph Drumlin Field ................................................................. 2-17 2.4.5 Horseshoe Moraines ................................................................. 2-17 2.4.6 Waterloo Hills ............................................................................ 2-18 2.4.7 Flamborough Plain .................................................................... 2-18 2.4.8 Norfolk Sand Plain ..................................................................... 2-18 2.4.9 Oxford Till Plain ......................................................................... 2-19 2.4.10 Mount Elgin Ridges ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents 1 Introduction to the Region of Waterloo
    Appendix 2: Region of Waterloo Table of Contents 1 Introduction to the Region of Waterloo ..................................................................2 1.1 Regional Growth Management Strategy............................................................................ 4 1.1.1 Changing Attitudes ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 Measurable Results.................................................................................................... 5 2 Review of the Region of Waterloo Plans and Actions against Smart Growth Assessment Criteria .......................................................................................................6 2.1 Development Location ....................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Context for Development Location in Region............................................................. 6 2.1.2 Urban Boundary Expansions.................................................................................... 10 2.1.3 Redevelopment and Infill.......................................................................................... 12 2.1.3.1 Core Redevelopment ........................................................................................ 12 2.1.3.2 Brownfields Redevelopment ............................................................................. 13 2.1.3.3 Development Charges and Financial Incentives .............................................. 13 2.1.4
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Groundwater Monitoring in the Grand River Watershed
    Regional Groundwater Monitoring in the Grand River Watershed Grand River Conservation Authority Prepared by the Groundwater Resources Group Regional Groundwater Monitoring within the Grand River Watershed Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Monitoring Well Data ................................................................................................................................... 5 Aquifers within the Grand River Watershed ................................................................................................. 5 Bedrock Aquifers ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Guelph Formation ............................................................................................................................... 10 Gasport, Salina, Oriskany, and Bois Blanc Formations ....................................................................... 10 Overburden Aquifers .............................................................................................................................. 11 Outwash Deposits ............................................................................................................................... 13 Waterloo Moraine and Equivalent Sediments .................................................................................... 15 Paris Galt Moraine
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Investigation
    5. Conclusions This hydrogeologic investigation provides details of geology, groundwater flow patterns and groundwater elevations for the proposed White Tail Crossing development located on Wideman Road. The data collected provided additional information to further characterize subsurface stratigraphy at the site. The following conclusions are based on the findings of the hydrogeologic investigation: • Groundwater at the site generally flows to the west, towards Monastery Creek and it’s tributary located adjacent to the site. Hydraulic conductivity values estimated from single well response tests within the silt/sand unit range from 4.1 x 10-6 to 5.4 x 10-7 m/s. A single well response test conducted in the silt/clay unit (Maryhill Till) indicated a hydraulic conductivity of 7.2 x 10-8 m/s. Calculated groundwater velocities range between 1.5 and 7 m/year. • The silt/clay unit underlying the surficial silt/sand is interpreted as the Maryhill Till unit and appears continuous across the site. At the location of MW-06-5 and BH-06-14 a drift sequence is evident consisting of fine sand with interbedded clay and silt. This drift sequence is considered to be part of the Maryhill Till unit. At the location of BH-06-13 the thickness of the silt/clay unit was observed to be 4 metres at a depth ranging from 353 and 349 m AMSL. Information from nearby water supply wells indicate the silt/clay unit is on the order of 18 m thick. • The continuous silt/clay unit provides protection for the underlying regional aquifer. Downward migration of potential contaminants such as road salt is limited due to the low permeability unit that extends across the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Cedar Creek Scoped Subwatershed Study
    Report: PDL-CPL-19-36 Region of Waterloo Planning, Development and Legislative Services Community Planning To: Chair Tom Galloway and Members of the Planning and Works Committee Date: October 22, 2019 File Code: D03-30 Subject: Upper Cedar Creek Scoped Subwatershed Study Recommendation: That the Regional Municipality of Waterloo approve the Upper Cedar Creek Scoped Subwatershed Study as outlined in Report PDL-CPL-19-36, dated October 22, 2019. Summary: The Regional Municipality of Waterloo partnered with the Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA), and retained the consulting team of Matrix Solutions Inc. (Matrix), Wood Environment and Infrastructure (Wood), Natural Resource Solutions Inc. (NRSI), and SGL Planning & Design (SGL Planning), to undertake the Upper Cedar Creek Scoped Subwatershed Study (Scoped SWS), commencing in mid-2017. Cedar Creek is a perennial coldwater stream, draining a 7,463 ha area within the City of Kitchener and Township of North Dumfries. The headwaters of the creek are located on the Waterloo Moraine which is the Region’s single most important drinking water source. The Scoped SWS is intended to guide and coordinate decision-making by the Region, area municipalities, the Grand River Conservation Authority, and others involved in development planning and subwatershed stewardship and restoration. The Region committed to undertaking and completing the Scoped SWS to inform the current review of the Regional Official Plan (ROP), to be completed by late 2020. The results of this study will also help inform the delineation of the Regional Recharge Area (RRA) within the Southwest Kitchener Policy Area (SKPA), which will be finalized 3096509 Page 1 of 14 October 22, 2019 Report: PDL-CPL-19-36 through the current ROP Review, as set out in ROP policy 2.B.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Planning in Ontario
    Watershed Planning in Ontario Guidance for land-use planning authorities DRAFT February 2018 February 2018 Page 2 of 159 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION How to Read this Document ................................................................... 4 Introduction ............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Watershed Planning Process ............................................................................. 7 2.2 Principles............................................................................................................ 9 2.3 Brief History of Watershed Planning in Ontario ................................................ 10 2.4 Current Framework .......................................................................................... 11 2.5 Definitions of Watershed Planning ................................................................... 12 2.6 Summary of Policy Requirements .................................................................... 16 2.7 Roles & Coordination ....................................................................................... 21 2.8 Equivalency & Transition Provisions ................................................................ 23 Engagement and Indigenous Perspectives .......................................... 25 3.1 Effective Engagement & Committees ............................................................... 25 3.2 Partnering with Indigenous Communities ......................................................... 28 PHASE 1 EXISTING
    [Show full text]