Watershed Planning in Ontario

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Watershed Planning in Ontario Watershed Planning in Ontario Guidance for land-use planning authorities DRAFT February 2018 February 2018 Page 2 of 159 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION How to Read this Document ................................................................... 4 Introduction ............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Watershed Planning Process ............................................................................. 7 2.2 Principles............................................................................................................ 9 2.3 Brief History of Watershed Planning in Ontario ................................................ 10 2.4 Current Framework .......................................................................................... 11 2.5 Definitions of Watershed Planning ................................................................... 12 2.6 Summary of Policy Requirements .................................................................... 16 2.7 Roles & Coordination ....................................................................................... 21 2.8 Equivalency & Transition Provisions ................................................................ 23 Engagement and Indigenous Perspectives .......................................... 25 3.1 Effective Engagement & Committees ............................................................... 25 3.2 Partnering with Indigenous Communities ......................................................... 28 PHASE 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Watershed Delineation & Characterization ........................................... 32 4.1 Delineation of Watersheds & Subwatersheds for Land Use Planning .............. 32 4.2 Identification of the Water Resource System ................................................... 34 4.3 Characterization of Existing Conditions ............................................................ 39 Setting the Vision, Goals, Objectives, & Targets .................................. 49 PHASE 2 IMPACTS, SCENARIOS AND DIRECTIONS Watershed Planning Elements & Best Practices .................................. 54 6.1 Water Quantity, Water Budget, & Water Conservation Plans........................... 54 6.2 Water Quality & Nutrient Load Assessment ..................................................... 64 6.3 Natural Hazards in Watershed Planning & Subwatershed Plans ..................... 73 DRAFT WATERSHED PLANNING GUIDANCE February 2018 Page 3 of 159 6.4 Climate Change & Watershed Management .................................................... 79 6.5 Connections to Natural Systems ...................................................................... 87 6.6 Cumulative Effects Assessment ....................................................................... 93 6.7 Assessment of Land Use & Management Scenarios ..................................... 102 PHASE 3 WATERSHED PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Implementation ................................................................................... 110 7.1 Watershed Plan & Subwatershed Plan Development .................................... 110 7.2 Informing Land Use Planning & Integrated Planning for Water, Wastewater, & Stormwater .................................................................................................... 115 7.3 Implementing The Plans Beyond Municipal Policy & Land Use Decision-Making ………………………………………………………………………………………..122 Monitoring & Adaptive Management .................................................. 126 Resources .......................................................................................... 130 Abbreviated Terms .......................................................................... 149 Appendix A ...................................................................................... 151 Please note that this guidance is a draft for engagement purposes. The Province continues to work with municipalities, other interested parties, and First Nations and Metis communities and organizations in developing this document. Any examples are for illustrative purposes of the concepts proposed for watershed planning. DRAFT WATERSHED PLANNING GUIDANCE INTRODUCTION February 2018 Page 4 of 159 How to Read this Document Watershed Planning Guidance is intended to support municipalities in watershed planning throughout Ontario, to support the implementation of the four provincial land use plans – the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2017 (Growth Plan), the Greenbelt Plan, 2017 (Greenbelt Plan), the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, 2017 (ORMCP), and the Niagara Escarpment Plan, 2017 (NEP) and the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 (PPS). The PPS provides policy direction for communities across Ontario, while provincial land use plans provide policy direction for specific areas. The Watershed Planning Guidance document is divided into seven main sections, plus additional resources, as outlined in the following paragraphs. Section 2 Introduction This section should be consulted for background information and context for watershed and subwatershed planning. Requirements for watershed planning and subwatershed plans in Ontario's existing legislative and strategic contexts are identified in section 2.1, taking into account province-wide and geographically-specific policies (i.e. PPS and the provincial plan areas). The remainder of section 2 addresses principles, history, current framework, definitions, policy requirements, roles and equivalency provisions. Section 3 Engagement and Indigenous Perspectives This section should be consulted to gain an understanding of potential engagement approaches, considerations and Indigenous perspectives. This section provides best practices and resources for engagement in section 3.1, including public and stakeholder engagement, steering committees, and partnerships. Guidance is provided for Indigenous engagement in municipal watershed planning in section 3.2, including determining interests and considerations, and traditional knowledge. Section 4 Watershed Delineation & Characterization This section should be consulted to determine best practices, approaches, and resources for watershed characterization. This section provides resources to support watershed characterization, which is a fundamental component of watershed and subwatershed planning. Connections are provided to various watershed planning elements section 6, such as water quality, climate change, and natural systems. DRAFT WATERSHED PLANNING GUIDANCE February 2018 Page 5 of 159 Delineation of watersheds and subwatersheds for municipal planning is outlined in section 4.1. Identification of water resource systems, as defined in the PPS, Growth Plan, and Greenbelt Plan, is outlined in section 4.2. Characterization of existing conditions is outlined in section 4.3. Section 5 Setting the Vision, Objectives, Goals, & Targets This section should be consulted to determine approaches for visioning and setting objectives, goals, and targets in watershed and subwatershed planning. This section provides resources to support setting watershed-specific visions, objectives, goals, and targets. Connections with monitoring and adaptive management are provided, to ensure that objectives, goals, and targets for management actions and ecological state can be effectively monitored and adapted. Section 6 Watershed Planning Elements & Best Practices This section should be consulted for guidance in undertaking elements of watershed planning. This section provides resources to support the following components: • Water budget and water conservation plans are outlined in section 6.1 • Water quality and nutrient load assessments are outlined in section 6.2 • Natural hazards, as they relate to municipal watershed planning, are outlined in section 6.3 • Climate change and extreme weather event considerations, which have been incorporated throughout the document, are outlined in section 6.4. • Natural systems, and interconnections with water systems and watershed planning, are outlined in section 6.5. • Cumulative impact assessment approaches are outlined in section 6.6. • Land use and management scenario analysis methods and best practices are outlined in section 6.7. Section 7 Developing the Plan & Implementing Provincial Policy This section should be consulted for guidance to support implementation of watershed planning to inform land use and infrastructure planning. Development of watershed plans and subwatershed plans, and connections to implementation considerations, are outlined in section 7.1. Water, wastewater, and stormwater planning considerations are outlined in section 7.2. Integration of watershed planning with land use planning and development decision- making is also outlined in this section. DRAFT WATERSHED PLANNING GUIDANCE February 2018 Page 6 of 159 Considerations and best practices for implementing watershed planning beyond municipal land use planning are outlined in section 7.3. Section 8 Monitoring & Adaptive Management This section should be consulted for guidance in developing environmental monitoring plans and adaptive management strategies. This section provides guidance regarding environmental monitoring plans; data and communication; adaptive management; watershed plan review and updates; and planning, design, and development approaches to adaptively manage land and water resources. Section 9 Resources Considered This section should be consulted for bibliographic references, additional information, and external resources and links
Recommended publications
  • York Region Social Capital Study
    York Region Social Capital Study 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The York Region Social Capital Study is an initiative of United Way Greater Toronto and Wellesley Institute. The authors are: Stephanie Procyk (United Way Greater Toronto) Mihaela Dinca-Panaitescu (United Way Greater Toronto) The York Region Social Capital Study builds on the theoretical framework and survey developed for the 2018 Toronto Social Capital Study and complements a second report called the Peel Social Capital Study covering Peel Region. The authors thank the Toronto Foundation, Environics Institute, Community Foundations of Canada/ Canadian Heritage, MLSE Foundation, Ontario Trillium Foundation, TAS Design Build, United Way Greater Toronto, Wellesley Institute, CanadaHelps, City of Toronto, Environics Analytics, National Institute on Ageing, and Toronto Public Health for their roles in developing the Toronto Social Capital Study. The authors and partners would like to thank all of those who took the time to complete a survey, participated in a community conversation or helped organize a community conversation. R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. was responsible for collecting survey data. A number of people helped shape this project’s outcome. Michelynn Laflèche, Nation Cheong, Ruth Crammond, James Iveniuk, Nauman Khan, Laura McDonough, Kwame McKenzie, Brenda Roche, Jane Wedlock, Sidhra Yakub, and Biljana Zuvela all made important contributions. We thank Erika Clark, James Iveniuk, Mark Morrison and Alex Shatrov for their contributions on data analysis. The report was made possible by funding from United Way Greater Toronto, The Regional Municipality of York, York Regional Police, and Wellesley Institute. ISBN: 978-0-921669-46-3 2021 CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ................................................... 2 1.1 Key findings ....................................................3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Event-Based Recharge on the Vulnerability of Public Supply Wells
    sustainability Review Impacts of Event-Based Recharge on the Vulnerability of Public Supply Wells Andrew J. Wiebe 1,* , David L. Rudolph 1, Ehsan Pasha 1,2, Jacqueline M. Brook 1,3, Mike Christie 1,4 and Paul G. Menkveld 1,5 1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; [email protected] (D.L.R.); [email protected] (E.P.); [email protected] (J.M.B.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (P.G.M.) 2 Les Services EXP Inc., Montréal, QC H1Z 4J2, Canada 3 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Kitchener, ON N2G 4Y9, Canada 4 Hamilton Water, Hamilton, ON L8R 2K3, Canada 5 Golder Associates Ltd., Cambridge, ON N1T 1A8, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-5198884567 Abstract: Dynamic recharge events related to extreme rainfall or snowmelt are becoming more common due to climate change. The vulnerability of public supply wells to water quality degradation may temporarily increase during these types of events. The Walkerton, ON, Canada, tragedy (2000) highlighted the threat to human health associated with the rapid transport of microbial pathogens to public supply wells during dynamic recharge events. Field research at the Thornton (Woodstock, ON, Canada) and Mannheim West (Kitchener, ON, Canada) well fields, situated in glacial overburden aquifers, identified a potential increase in vulnerability due to event-based recharge phenomena. Ephemeral surface water flow and local ponding containing microbial pathogen indicator species Citation: Wiebe, A.J.; Rudolph, D.L.; were observed and monitored within the capture zones of public supply wells following heavy rain Pasha, E.; Brook, J.M.; Christie, M.; and/or snowmelt.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Analysis and the Development of 3-D Geological Models for Regional Hydrogeological Applications
    Introduction - Basin Analysis and the Development of 3-D Geological Models for Regional Hydrogeological Applications Russell, H.1, R.C. Berg2, and L.H. Thorleifson3 1Geological Survey of Canada; 2Illinois State Geological Survey; 3Minnesota Geological Survey This workshop is the third in an ongoing series discussing three-dimensional (3-D) geological model construction for groundwater applications. A central theme of the workshops has been development of techniques for reconciling disparate archival and high quality data sets to produce the most robust 3-D stratigraphic and hydrostratigraphic models possible. The first workshop focused on the use of archival water well records for the development of 3-D models (Berg and Thorleifson, 2001). The second workshop considered the widespread use of water well data to address questions of broader basin methodologies, techniques for collecting high quality data, and the need for geostatistical techniques in data interpolation (Thorleifson and Berg, 2002). The value and pertinence of these workshops and the resultant interagency collaboration toward improved methodologies parallels recommendations by the National Research Council (NRC) (2000) for Investigating Groundwater Systems on Regional and National Scales. This NRC review highlights two important issues connecting geology and hydrogeology: $ Collaboration between scientists that permits geological information to be used in scaling up the results of a local groundwater study in areas where hydrogeological data are sparse or nonexistent. $ Characterization of heterogeneous aquifers at large and small scales through understanding links between geology and hydrogeology In the United States, the Regional Aquifer Simulation Assessment (RASA) studies are one example of a multi-agency approach to regional groundwater investigations (Sun and Johnson, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Management Plan for the Waterloo Moraine: a Comprehensive Assessment of Its Current State Within the Region of Waterloo
    Towards a Management Plan for the Waterloo Moraine: A Comprehensive Assessment of its Current State within the Region of Waterloo by Lindsay Poulin A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies in Geography Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2009 © Lindsay Poulin 2009 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. Lindsay Poulin ii ABSTRACT The Region of Waterloo (ROW) and Oxford County contain a significant landscape unit called the Waterloo Moraine that provides multiple ecological and water resource functions to surrounding communities. These functions include; providing a clean and abundant source of water, natural landscapes for plant and animal habitats, natural areas for recreational enjoyment, prime agricultural lands on which to grow food and aggregate resources in close proximity to large markets. This landscape unit is similar to the Oak Ridges Moraine (ORM) located in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). The purpose of this research is to conduct an examination of the current state of management for the Waterloo Moraine within the ROW and Oxford County. Attributes of the Waterloo Moraine examined include; water resources, agricultural resources, mineral aggregate resources, Environmentally Sensitive Landscapes (ESLs), natural core areas, natural linkage areas and settlement areas. While the hydrologic functions have been most studied within this landscape unit, the Moraine has predominantly been studied from a focused perspective rather than a comprehensive one.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town
    Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town: The Learning resource Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town: The Learning resource 2017-12 (Version 1.0) This learning resource has been prepared, published and distributed by the Public Legal Education Association of Saskatchewan (PLEA). The content of this publication should not form the basis of legal advice of any kind. Individuals seeking specific legal advice should consult a lawyer. PLEA is a non-profit, non-government organization funded by the Law Foundation of Saskatchewan. PLEA also receives financial support from the Department of Justice Canada and the Saskatchewan Ministry of Justice and Attorney General. PLEA is supported by the Law Society of Saskatchewan, Canadian Bar Association (Saskatchewan Branch), College of Law, Legal Aid Saskatchewan, Ministry of Education, Saskatoon Public Library and the public libraries and regional colleges throughout the province. Contents may not be commercially reproduced, but reproduction for not-for-profit educational purposes is encouraged provided that PLEA is properly credited and contents are not taken out of context. Graphics credit Shutterstock. © 2017 Public Legal Education Association of Saskatchewan, Inc. ISBN #978-1-988445-09-0 Table of ConTenTs ...............................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ......................................................................3 SunshineThe People Sketches of Mariposa of
    [Show full text]
  • Grand River Conservation Authority
    Grand River Conservation Authority Report number: GM-06-19-61 Date: June 28, 2019 To: Members of Grand River Conservation Authority Subject: Water Management Plan Reporting – Five years of implementation Recommendation: THAT Report Number GM-06-19-61 – Water Management Plan Reporting – Five years of implementation be received as information. Summary: Through a long-standing commitment to improve watershed water management, the Grand River Conservation Authority continues to support and coordinate a collaborative Water Management Plan with municipalities, government agencies, and First Nations. The GRCA role is to co-ordinate and facilitate this plan by collaborating with partners, hosting and organizing meetings and introducing new staff in partner agencies to the plan. The goals of the Plan are to 1. Reduce flood damage potential; 2. Ensure water supply for communities, economies and ecosystems; 3. Improve water quality to improve river health and reduce the river’s impact on Lake Erie; and 4. Increase resiliency to deal with a changing climate across the watershed. This Plan provides the framework from which partner agencies can align work plans to help realize greater outcomes for effective watershed water management. A fundamental outcome of the plan is to look for best value solutions to water management problems and issues in the watershed and to act as neutral party to assist with finding solutions. Report: Managing water resources in Ontario is a shared responsibility. The Water Management Plan provides the framework for collective and collaborative action on water management that transcends municipal boundaries. The goals of the Plan are to 1. Reduce flood damage potential; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CORPORATION of the TOWN of GEORGINA HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA Wednesday, April 18Th, 2018 6:30 PM Council Chambers
    GHC Agenda 1 2018-04-11 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GEORGINA HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA Wednesday, April 18th, 2018 6:30 PM Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at “We would like to begin today’s meeting by acknowledging that the Town of Georgina is located over lands originally used and occupied by the First Peoples of the Williams Treaties First Nations and other Indigenous Peoples and thank them for sharing this land. We would also like to acknowledge the Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation as our close neighbour and friend, one with which we strive to build a cooperative and respectful relationship.” 2. ROLL CALL 3. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 6. ADOPTION OF MINUTES Pages 1-5 (1) Minutes of Georgina Heritage Committee meeting March 21st, 2018. 7. DELEGATIONS/SPEAKERS 8. PRESENTATIONS Pages 6-99 (1) Golder Associates Ltd. - 36 Church Street 9. CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS ON THE AGENDA 10. COMMUNICATIONS GHC Agenda 2 2018-04-11 Pages 100-102 (1) Demolition Permits (March 1st to March 31st, 2018) 11. OTHER BUSINESS Page 103 (1) Terms of Reference – Original Pages 104-106 Terms of Reference – Second Revision Page 107 (2) Volunteer Wanted! For appointment to Georgina Heritage Advisory Committee (3) Plaques, proposal for Sutton plaque and regular one’s for designated properties. (4) Designations (ongoing) Suggestion: Mann Cemetery on Queensway North, Keswick Suggestion: Railway and enterprise shipwreck Suggestion: The Briars, stable and old tree St. James Parish Hall, update if available Ainsley Hill: Shouldice Property 216-235 Catering Road (5) Heritage Register updates (ongoing item) Pages 108-109 MPAC list (6) Tax incentives, update if available.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Geology of the Guelph Area, Waterloo, Wellington, and Halton Counties; Ontario Department of Mines, Geological Branch, Open File Report 5008, 40P
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS PRODUCT Your use of this electronic information product (“EIP”), and the digital data files contained on it (the “Content”), is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By opening the EIP and viewing the Content , you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. EIP and Content: This EIP and Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry (MNDMF) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinions expressed are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the EIP and its Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDMF does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable or that the EIP is free from viruses or other harmful components. MNDMF is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the EIP or the Content. MNDMF assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the EIP or the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This EIP or the Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDMF. Linked Web sites may not be available in French.
    [Show full text]
  • York Region’S Response to the Ontario Ministry of Health’S Discussion Paper on Emergency Health Services Modernization
    From: Switzer, Barbara on behalf of Regional Clerk Monday, March 2, 2020 3:32 PM Subject: Regional Council Decision - Response to Ontario Ministry of Health's Discussion Paper on Emergency Health Services Modernization Attachments: Original Staff Report - Response to Ontario Ministry of Health's Discuss....pdf CAUTION: This email originated from a source outside the City of Markham. DO NOT CLICK on any links or attachments, or reply unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. On February 27, 2020 Regional Council made the following decision: 1. Council approve Attachment 1 as York Region’s response to the Ontario Ministry of Health’s Discussion Paper on Emergency Health Services Modernization. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate the Region’s response to the following: Ministry of Health, Members of Provincial Parliament in York Region, Clerks of the nine local municipalities, Southlake Community Ontario Health Team, Eastern York Region and North Durham Ontario Health Team, Mackenzie Health Hospital, Association of Municipalities of Ontario, Ontario Association of Paramedic Chiefs and CUPE 905 — York Region Unit. The original staff report is attached for your information. Please contact Lisa Gonsalves, General Manager, Paramedic and Seniors Services at 1-877-464-9675 ext.72090 if you have any questions with respect to this matter. Regards, Christopher Raynor | Regional Clerk, Regional Clerk’s Office, Corporate Services ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Regional Municipality of York | 17250 Yonge Street | Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1 O: 1-877-464-9675 ext. 71300 | [email protected] | www.york.ca Our Mission: Working together to serve our thriving communities – today and tomorrow 1 The Regional Municipality of York Regional Council Community and Health Services February 27, 2020 Report of the Commissioner of Community and Health Services Response to Ontario Ministry of Health’s Discussion Paper on Emergency Health Services Modernization 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Municipality of Waterloo Ecological and Environmental Advisory Committee Agenda
    Media Release: Friday, March 23, 2018, 4:30 p.m. Regional Municipality of Waterloo Ecological and Environmental Advisory Committee Agenda Monday, March 26, 2018 Dinner: 5:30 p.m. Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Room 110 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener, Ontario 1. Election of Chair and Vice Chair for 2018 2. Introduction of New Members: Don Drackley, Garrett Gauthier, Ken Hough, Daniel Marshall 3. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest under the “Municipal Conflict of Interest Act” 4. Approval of Minutes - December 18, 2017 Page 3 5. Delegations/Reports 5.1 Community Climate Adaptation Planning i. David Roewade, Sustainability Specialist and Nicholas Cloet, Climate Change Coordinator, Region of Waterloo Community Planning 5.2 EEAC-18-001, Tri-City Lands Limited Germet Pit Extension, St. Agatha Forest Environmentally Sensitive Policy Area (ESPA 15) Page 6 Should you require an alternative format please contact the Regional Clerk at Tel.: 519-575-4400, TTY: 519-575-4605, or [email protected] 2685270 EEAC Agenda - 2 - 18/03/26 i. Rick Esbaugh, Tri-City Lands Ltd., Brett Woodman, NRSI and Stan Denoed, Harden Environmental 5.3 EEAC-18-002, Long-Term Target for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions in Waterloo Region Page 16 i. Kate Daley, Climate Action Waterloo Region 5.4 EEAC-18-003, Proposed CRH/Dufferin Aggregates Chudyk Pit, ESPA 53 (Alps Woods), Dumfries Carolinian Environmentally Sensitive Landscape, Township of North Dumfries Page 19 i. Brian Zeman, MHBC Planning and Ken Zimmerman, CRH/Dufferin Aggregates 6. Information/Correspondence 6.1 Cedar Creek Subwatershed Study – Public Consultation Centre #1, April 25, 2018, North Dumfries Community Complex 6.2 Regional Comments on Proposed Study Area for Greenbelt Expansion i.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Grand River Watershed an Overview of Bedrock and Quaternary Geological Interpretations in the Grand River Watershed
    Geology of the Grand River Watershed An Overview of Bedrock and Quaternary Geological Interpretations in the Grand River watershed Prepared by Bob Janzen, GIT December 2018 i Table of Contents List of Maps ..................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. iii 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Bedrock Geology .................................................................................................. 1 Algonquin Arch ......................................................................................................... 2 Bedrock Cuestas ...................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Bedrock Surface ................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Bedrock Formations of the Grand River watershed ........................................... 8 2.2.1 Queenston Formation ................................................................................ 15 2.2.2 Clinton–Cataract Group ............................................................................. 15 2.2.2.1 Whirlpool Formation ............................................................................ 16 2.2.2.2 Manitoulin Formation ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grand River Source Protection Area: Assessment Report
    Grand River Source Protection Area Approved Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ........................................................................ 2-5 2.1 Lake Erie Source Protection Region ........................................................... 2-5 2.2 Grand River Source Protection Area ........................................................... 2-5 2.3 Population, Population Density and Future Projections ............................... 2-6 2.4 Physiography ............................................................................................ 2-16 2.4.1 Dundalk Till Plain ....................................................................... 2-16 2.4.2 Stratford Till Plain ...................................................................... 2-16 2.4.3 Hillsburg Sandhills ..................................................................... 2-17 2.4.4 Guelph Drumlin Field ................................................................. 2-17 2.4.5 Horseshoe Moraines ................................................................. 2-17 2.4.6 Waterloo Hills ............................................................................ 2-18 2.4.7 Flamborough Plain .................................................................... 2-18 2.4.8 Norfolk Sand Plain ..................................................................... 2-18 2.4.9 Oxford Till Plain ......................................................................... 2-19 2.4.10 Mount Elgin Ridges ..................................................................
    [Show full text]