DOCSLIB.ORG

Accessions for Cooperator

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Accessions for cooperator Accessions with University of California as source 1. DFIC 1 Ficus carica Vernino 2. DFIC 2 Ficus carica Panachee 3. DFIC 3 Ficus carica Marabout C.Smyrnay 4. DFIC 4 Ficus carica UCR 291 5. DFIC 5 Ficus carica Conadria 6. DFIC 6 Ficus carica UCR 347-1 7. DFIC 7 Ficus carica Archipel 8. DFIC 8 Ficus carica UCR 228-20 9. DFIC 9 Ficus carica Flanders 10. DFIC 10 Ficus carica UCR 271-1 11. DFIC 12 Ficus carica Mission 12. DFIC 13 Ficus hybrid DFIC 13 13. DFIC 14 Ficus carica UCR 276-49 14. DFIC 15 Ficus carica DiRedo 15. DFIC 16 Ficus carica Santa Cruz Dark 16. DFIC 17 Ficus carica Brown Turkey 17. DFIC 19 Ficus carica UCR 276-14 18. DFIC 20 Ficus carica Excel 19. DFIC 21 Ficus carica Tena 20. DFIC 22 Ficus carica Mary Lane 21. DFIC 23 Ficus hybrid DFIC 23 22. DFIC 24 Ficus carica Deanna 23. DFIC 25 Ficus carica UCR 278-128 24. DFIC 26 Ficus carica Verte 25. DFIC 27 Ficus carica Beall 26. DFIC 28 Ficus carica UCR 309 B-1 27. DFIC 29 Ficus hybrid DFIC 29 28. DFIC 30 Ficus carica Genoa 29. DFIC 31 Ficus carica Alma 30. DFIC 32 Ficus carica Adriatic 31. DFIC 33 Ficus carica Yellow Neeches 32. DFIC 34 Ficus carica Brunswick 33. DFIC 35 Ficus carica Orphan 34. DFIC 36 Ficus carica Zidi 35. DFIC 37 Ficus carica UCR 291-4 http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/cno_acc.pl?61329 (1 of 21) [5/31/2009 3:37:10 PM] Accessions for cooperator 36. DFIC 47 Ficus carica Pastiliere 37. DFIC 48 Ficus carica UCR 143-36 38. DFIC 49 Ficus carica UCR 143-5 39. DFIC 54 Ficus carica UCR 153-7 40. DFIC 59 Ficus carica UCR 135-4S 41. DFIC 60 Ficus carica UCR 152-4S 42. DFIC 61 Ficus carica UCR 200-43 43. DFIC 62 Ficus carica UCR 143-38 44. DFIC 64 Ficus carica UCR 160-50 45. DFIC 65 Ficus carica UCR 143-28 46. DFIC 68 Ficus carica UCR 187-25 47. DFIC 71 Ficus carica UCR 171-59 48. DFIC 76 Ficus carica UCR 135-15S 49. DFIC 82 Ficus carica UCR 184-15 50. DFIC 83 Ficus carica UCR 153-17 51. DFIC 89 Ficus carica UCR 184-15s 52. DFIC 95 Ficus hybrid UCR 324-2 53. DFIC 96 Ficus hybrid UCR 337-3 54. DFIC 97 Ficus hybrid UCR 333-1 55. DFIC 98 Ficus hybrid UCR 327-1 56. DFIC 100 Ficus hybrid UCR 315-1 57. DFIC 101 Ficus hybrid UCR 326-1 58. DFIC 102 Ficus carica UCR 284-11 59. DFIC 103 Ficus hybrid UCR 337-2 60. DFIC 105 Ficus hybrid UCR K-7-11 61. DFIC 106 Ficus hybrid UCR 319-1 62. DFIC 107 Ficus hybrid UCR 233-10 63. DFIC 108 Ficus hybrid UCR 341-1 64. DFIC 109 Ficus hybrid UCR K-6-5 65. DFIC 110 Ficus hybrid DFIC 110 66. DFIC 186 Ficus carica KAC 11-4W 67. PI 133875 Citrus limon ITALIAN 68. PI 244965 Citrus sinensis BLANCA MACETERA 69. PI 244968 Citrus sinensis VERNA 70. PI 268135 Ficus stricta 71. PI 539142 Aegle marmelos Indian bael fruit 72. PI 539143 Aeglopsis chevalieri Chevalier's aeglopsis 73. PI 539144 Atalantia ceylanica Ceylon atalantia http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/cno_acc.pl?61329 (2 of 21) [5/31/2009 3:37:10 PM] Accessions for cooperator 74. PI 539145 Atalantia citroides Cochin China Atalantia 75. PI 539146 Atalantia ceylanica Ceylon atalantia 76. PI 539147 Balsamocitrus dawei Uganda powder-flask fruit 77. PI 539149 Citropsis gilletiana Gillet's cherry orange 78. PI 539150 Citrus asahikan ASAHIKAN 79. PI 539151 Citrus aurantiifolia MEXICAN 80. PI 539152 Citrus aurantiifolia WEST INDIAN 81. PI 539153 Citrus aurantiifolia STOW #7 82. PI 539154 Citrus aurantiifolia EVERGLADE 83. PI 539155 Citrus aurantiifolia INDIA 84. PI 539156 Citrus aurantiifolia THORNLESS MEXICAN 85. PI 539158 Citrus aurantiifolia SANTA BARBARA 86. PI 539159 Citrus aurantium ORLANDO 87. PI 539160 Citrus aurantium DUMMETT 88. PI 539161 Citrus aurantium BRAZILIAN 89. PI 539162 Citrus aurantium STOW #20 90. PI 539163 Citrus aurantium KEEN #1-10 91. PI 539164 Citrus aurantium OLIVELANDS 92. PI 539165 Citrus aurantium GADADEHI 93. PI 539166 Citrus aurantium Willowleaf sour orange 94. PI 539167 Citrus aurantium CHINOTTO 95. PI 539168 Citrus aurantium RUBIDOUX 96. PI 539169 Citrus aurantium SEVILLE 97. PI 539170 Citrus aurantium GOUTOUCHENG 98. PI 539171 Citrus aurantium ZHULUAN 99. PI 539172 Citrus aurantium ZHULUAN 100. PI 539174 Citrus aurantium BOUQUET DES FLEURS 101. PI 539175 Citrus aurantium VARIEGATED 102. PI 539176 Citrus aurantium STANDARD 103. PI 539177 Citrus aurantium CITRUS VULGARIS 104. PI 539178 Citrus benikoji Benikoji, Dai Koji 105. PI 539179 Citrus bergamia BERGAMOT 106. PI 539180 Citrus bergamia BERGAMOTTO #18 107. PI 539181 Citrus canaliculata Kikudaidai 108. PI 539182 Citrus celebica C. MACROPHYLLA 109. PI 539183 Citrus clementina CLEMENTINE (ALGERIAN) 110. PI 539184 Citrus clementina CLEMENTINE CAFFIN 111. PI 539185 Citrus clementina CLEMENTINE SIDI AISSA http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/cno_acc.pl?61329 (3 of 21) [5/31/2009 3:37:10 PM] Accessions for cooperator 112. PI 539186 Citrus clementina CLEMENTINA FINA SODEA 113. PI 539187 Citrus davaoensis DAVAO 114. PI 539188 Citrus deliciosa WILLOWLEAF 115. PI 539189 Citrus depressa Shekwasha, C. pectinifera 116. PI 539190 Citrus erythrosa FUKUSHU 117. PI 539191 Citrus erythrosa KOBENI MIKAN 118. PI 539192 Citrus excelsa Le Nestour, Limon Real 119. PI 539193 Citrus excelsa LIMON REAL 120. PI 539194 Citrus excelsa CRC 2892 121. PI 539195 Citrus funadoko Funadoko orange 122. PI 539196 Citrus halimii mountain citron 123. PI 539197 Citrus halimii Mountain citron 124. PI 539198 Citrus hanaju HANAYU 125. PI 539199 Citrus hassaku Beni Hassaku 126. PI 539200 Citrus hiroshimana NATSUZABON 127. PI 539201 Citrus hiroshimana Natsuzabon 128. PI 539202 Citrus hybrid OROBLANCO 129. PI 539203 Citrus hybrid MELOGOLD 130. PI 539204 Citrus hybrid INDIA 131. PI 539205 Citrus hybrid PERRINE 132. PI 539206 Citrus hybrid Lemonime 133. PI 539207 Citrus hybrid KULU 134. PI 539208 Citrus hybrid 3748 lemon 135. PI 539209 Citrus hybrid NICARAGUAN 136. PI 539211 Citrus hybrid CHINESE LEMON 137. PI 539212 Citrus hybrid ADDANIMMA 138. PI 539213 Citrus hybrid INDIA 139. PI 539214 Citrus hybrid LIMOUI SANGUI 140. PI 539215 Citrus hybrid CALASHU 141. PI 539216 Citrus hybrid NISSV E 142. PI 539217 Citrus hybrid KULOBOT 143. PI 539219 Citrus hybrid COCKTAIL 144. PI 539220 Citrus hybrid NEW ZEALAND GRAPEFRUIT 145. PI 539221 Citrus hybrid CRC 3781 146. PI 539222 Citrus hybrid PUMA 147. PI 539223 Citrus hybrid Hassaku 148. PI 539224 Citrus hybrid CRC 42 149. PI 539225 Citrus hybrid GABBUCHINEE http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/cno_acc.pl?61329 (4 of 21) [5/31/2009 3:37:10 PM] Accessions for cooperator 150. PI 539226 Citrus hybrid CRC 3578 151. PI 539227 Citrus hybrid CRC 3681 152. PI 539228 Citrus hybrid CRC 3683 153. PI 539229 Citrus hybrid CRC 3684 154. PI 539230 Citrus hybrid CRC 3702 155. PI 539231 Citrus hybrid CRC 3703 156. PI 539232 Citrus hybrid CRC 3705 157. PI 539233 Citrus hybrid CRC 3706 158. PI 539234 Citrus hybrid CRC 3709 159. PI 539235 Citrus hybrid CRC 3712 160. PI 539236 Citrus hybrid CRC 3715 161. PI 539237 Citrus hybrid OROGOLD 162. PI 539238 Citrus hybrid CRC 648 163. PI 539239 Citrus reticulata TANKAN 164. PI 539240 Citrus reticulata DWEET 165. PI 539241 Citrus reticulata H-56 166. PI 539242 Citrus reticulata MENCY 167. PI 539243 Citrus reticulata ORTANIQUE 168. PI 539244 Citrus reticulata SUE LINDA TEMPLE 169. PI 539245 Citrus reticulata TANKAN 170. PI 539246 Citrus reticulata KIYOMI H-12 171. PI 539247 Citrus iyo IYOMIKAN 172. PI 539248 Citrus hystrix Mauritius papeda 173. PI 539249 Citrus hystrix Mauritius papeda 174. PI 539250 Citrus hystrix CABUYAO 175. PI 539251 Citrus ichangensis Ichang papeda 176. PI 539252 Citrus ichangensis Ichang papeda 177. PI 539253 Citrus ichangensis Ichang papeda 178. PI 539254 Citrus indica Indian wild orange 179. PI 539255 Citrus intermedia Yama mikan 180. PI 539256 Citrus iyo MIYAUCHI IYO 181. PI 539257 Citrus jambhiri MAZOE 182. PI 539258 Citrus jambhiri SOUTH AFRICAN 183. PI 539259 Citrus jambhiri CRC 3060 184. PI 539260 Citrus jambhiri JULLUNDRI KHATTI 185. PI 539261 Citrus jambhiri STOW RED 186. PI 539262 Citrus jambhiri FLORIDA "A" 187. PI 539263 Citrus jambhiri ESTES http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/cno_acc.pl?61329 (5 of 21) [5/31/2009 3:37:10 PM] Accessions for cooperator 188. PI 539264 Citrus jambhiri MILAM 189. PI 539265 Citrus jambhiri LIMONEIRA 190. PI 539266 Citrus jambhiri SCHAUB 191. PI 539267 Citrus jambhiri VANGASAY 192. PI 539268 Citrus jambhiri FLORIDA 193. PI 539269 Citrus keraji Keraji 194. PI 539270 Citrus kinokuni KINOKUNI 195. PI 539271 Citrus latifolia PAGE 196. PI 539272 Citrus latifolia BEARSS 197. PI 539273 Citrus latifolia TAHITI 198. PI 539274 Citrus latifolia PONDS 199. PI 539275 Citrus latifolia WILDER 200. PI 539276 Citrus leiocarpa Koji orange 201. PI 539277 Citrus limetta MITHA-TULIA 202. PI 539278 Citrus limetta CRC 3093 203. PI 539279 Citrus limetta BAKRAI 204. PI 539280 Citrus limetta LIMONETTE DE MARRAKECH 205. PI 539281 Citrus limetta MILLSWEET 206. PI 539282 Citrus limetta SNIFF 207. PI 539283 Citrus limettioides PALESTINE 208. PI 539284 Citrus limettioides WEIRICK 209. PI 539285 Citrus limettioides unnamed 210. PI 539286 Citrus limettioides sweet lime 211. PI 539287 Citrus limon INDIA 212. PI 539288 Citrus limon RHOBS EL ARSA 213. PI 539289 Citrus limon RHOBS EL ARSA 214.
Recommended publications
  • Responsive Online System for Acta Horticulturae Submission and Review

    Responsive Online System for Acta Horticulturae Submission and Review

    International Society for Horticultural Science ROSA - Responsive Online System for Acta Horticulturae submission and review This submission belongs to: XV Eucarpia Symposium on Fruit Breeding and Genetics Acta Below is the abstract for symposium nr 620, abstract nr 135: Horticulturae Home Title: Login Logout Improvement of salt tolerance and resistance to Phytophthora Status gummosis in citrus rootstocks through controlled hybridization ISHS Home Author(s): ISHS Contact Anas Fadli, UR APCRP, INRA, BP 257, Kenitra, Morocco; ISHS online [email protected] (presenting author) submission Dr. Samia Lotfy, UR APCRP, INRA, BP 257, Kenitra, Morocco; and review [email protected] (co-author) tool Mr. Abdelhak Talha, UR APCRP , INRA, BP 257, Kenitra, Morocco; homepage [email protected] (co-author) Calendar Dr. Driss Iraqi, UR de Biotechnologie, INRA, BP 415, Rabat, Morocco; of [email protected] (co-author) Symposia Dr. María Angeles Moreno, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, CSIC, Authors Av. Montañana 1.005, Zaragoza, Spain; [email protected] (co- Guide author) Prof. Dr . Rachid Benkirane, Laboratoire BBPP, Département de Biologie, Faculté des Sciences, Université Ibn Tofail, Kenitra, Morocco; [email protected] (co-author) Dr. Hamid Benyahia, UR APCRP, INRA, BP 257, Kenitra, Morocco; [email protected] (co-author) Preferred presentation method: Poster Abstract body text: The sustainability of Mediterranean citriculture depends largely on the use of rootstocks that provide a better adaptation to biotic and abiotic constraints, as well as a good graft-compatibility with commercial cultivars. In the absence of rootstocks meeting all these criteria, the management of the available diversity and the selection of the desirable traits are necessary.
  • Influence of Mitochondria Origin on Fruit Quality in a Citrus Cybrid

    Influence of Mitochondria Origin on Fruit Quality in a Citrus Cybrid

    Influence of mitochondria origin on fruit quality ina citrus cybrid. Jean-Baptiste Bassene, Liliane Berti, Elodie Carcouet, Claudie Dhuique-Mayer, Anne-Laure Fanciullino, Jean Bouffin, Patrick Ollitrault, Yann Froelicher To cite this version: Jean-Baptiste Bassene, Liliane Berti, Elodie Carcouet, Claudie Dhuique-Mayer, Anne-Laure Fan- ciullino, et al.. Influence of mitochondria origin on fruit quality in a citrus cybrid.. Jour- nal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, American Chemical Society, 2008, 56 (18), pp.8635-40. 10.1021/jf801233m. hal-00593592 HAL Id: hal-00593592 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00593592 Submitted on 16 May 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 8635–8640 8635 Influence of Mitochondria Origin on Fruit Quality in a Citrus Cybrid † ‡ § JEAN-BAPTISTE BASSENE, LILIANE BERTI, ELODIE CARCOUET, | † † CLAUDIE DHUIQUE-MAYER, ANNE-LAURE FANCIULLINO, JEAN BOUFFIN, † ,† PATRICK OLLITRAULT, AND YANN FROELICHER* Centre de Coope´ration Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le De´veloppement (CIRAD), UPR Multiplication ve´ge´tative, F-20230 San Giuliano, France, Universite´ de Corse, UMR CNRS 6134, Laboratoire Biochimie et Biologie Mole´culaire du Ve´ge´tal, Quartier Grossetti, BP 52, 20250 Corte, France, Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRA), UR GEQA, San Giuliano, F-20230 San Giuliano, France, and CIRAD, UMR QUALISUD, F-34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France Sugar, organic acid, and carotenoid are the most important indicators of fruit taste and nutritional and organoleptic quality.
  • Literature Research

    Literature Research

    Literature Search 20. Literature Search Growing Lemons in Australia - a production manual© 20 — 1 Literature Search Abu-Awwad, A.M. 2001. Influence of Different Water Quantities and Qualities on Lemon trees and Soil Salt Distribution at the Jordan Valley. Agricultural Water Management 52: 53-71. Young lemon trees (Eureka) were studied for five years (1996-2000). Five water levels and three water qualities were imposed via trickle irrigation system on clay loam soil. In saline substrates Na+ and C1- are usually the dominant ions. The lemon tree is a salt-sensitive crop to salinity, and even low salt concentrations may affect its growth and productivity. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the influence of different water and salinity levels on the development of young lemon (Eureka) trees. Materials and Methods A field experiment was conducted for 5 years. One dripper per tree for the first year, two drippers 1.0 m apart per tree for the second year, and thereafter four drippers 1.0 m apart. 8L/hr of five water levels and three water qualities. Conclusion Increasing irrigation water salinity increased salt concentration and osmotic potential in the root zone, and consequently reduced lemon annual water use, stem diameter and fruit yield. Regardless of irrigation water salinity, the significantly highest fruit yield was at irrigation water depth equal to evaporation depth from class A pan when corrected for tree canopy percentage shaded area. Adriaensens, S.Z., Past and Present Situation of the Spanish Citrus Industry, 1993. Lemon group The Verna is a typically Spanish variety of unknown origin.
  • Characteristic Volatile Fingerprints and Odor Activity Values in Different

    Characteristic Volatile Fingerprints and Odor Activity Values in Different

    molecules Article Characteristic Volatile Fingerprints and Odor Activity Values in Different Citrus-Tea by HS-GC-IMS and HS-SPME-GC-MS Heting Qi 1,2,3 , Shenghua Ding 1,2,3, Zhaoping Pan 1,2,3, Xiang Li 1,2,3 and Fuhua Fu 1,2,3,* 1 Longping Branch Graduate School, Hunan University, Changsha 410125, China; [email protected] (H.Q.); [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (Z.P.); [email protected] (X.L.) 2 Provincial Key Laboratory for Fruits and Vegetables Storage Processing and Quality Safety, Agricultural Product Processing Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China 3 Hunan Province International Joint Lab on Fruits & Vegetables Processing, Quality and Safety, Changsha 410125, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-0731-82873369 Received: 24 November 2020; Accepted: 16 December 2020; Published: 19 December 2020 Abstract: Citrus tea is an emerging tea drink produced from tea and the pericarp of citrus, which consumers have increasingly favored due to its potential health effects and unique flavor. This study aimed to simultaneously combine the characteristic volatile fingerprints with the odor activity values (OAVs) of different citrus teas for the first time by headspace gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) and headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Results showed that the establishment of a citrus tea flavor fingerprint based on HS-GC-IMS data can provide an effective means for the rapid identification and traceability of different citrus varieties. Moreover, 68 volatile compounds (OAV > 1) were identified by HS-SPME-GC-MS, which reflected the contribution of aroma compounds to the characteristic flavor of samples.
  • The Response of Several Citrus Genotypes to High-Salinity Irrigation Water

    The Response of Several Citrus Genotypes to High-Salinity Irrigation Water

    SOIL MANAGEMENT, FERTILIZATION, & IRRIGATION HORTSCIENCE 34(5):878–881. 1999. Most RANG trees died from attack by Phytophthora and are therefore not included in this report. This is not surprising, since in The Response of Several Citrus Israel RANG, more than any commercial root- stock, may become infected with foot rot, Genotypes to High-salinity Irrigation which is not detected in the nursery but be- comes severe after transplanting (Levy et al., Water 1980). Location. One-year-old seedlings of the Y. Levy1 and J. Lifshitz different genotypes were planted in the field at the Ramat haNegev Desert Agro-Research Agricultural Research Organization, Gilat Experiment Station, Mobile Post Center at 31°05´N and 34°41´E, elevation Negev2, 85-280 Israel ≈300 m, and mean annual rainfall (winter only) <100 mm. The soil is light loess (eolian sandy Y. De Malach and Y. David loam) with 5% to 8% clay and a pH of 8.0–8.4. Ramat haNegev Desert Agro-Research Center, Mobile Post Chalutza, Experimental design. Four salinities were Israel applied with DES (De Malach et al., 1996) at increasing levels along the rows. Salinity Additional index words. Cleopatra mandarin, Citrus reshni, Gou Tou Cheng, C. aurantium ranged from 2.0 to 6.4 dS·m–1 in four linear hybrid?, Rangpur, C. limonia, RT803, C. limonia x (C. sinensis x Poncirus trifoliata), sour steps. Each salinity level was applied to groups orange C. aurantium, SB812, C. sunki x Poncirus trifoliata, rootstock, chloride, sodium, of three plants in each row. With no buffer stress trees between the different salinity treatments, the first tree at a given salinity was partially Abstract.
  • Citrus Group 3-1.1

    Citrus Group 3-1.1

    CPVO-TP/203/1 Date: 18/11/2004 EUROPEAN UNION COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY OFFICE PROTOCOL FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY TESTS Citrus L. – Group 3 LEMONS and LIMES UPOV Species Code: CITRU, CITRU_AUR, CITRU_LAT, CITRU_LIM Adopted on 18/11/2004 1 CPVO-TP/203/1 Date: 18/11/2004 I SUBJECT OF THE PROTOCOL The protocol describes the technical procedures to be followed in order to meet the Council Regulation 2100/94 on Community Plant Variety Rights. The technical procedures have been agreed by the Administrative Council and are based on general UPOV Document TG/1/3 and UPOV guideline TG/203/1 dated 09/04/2003 for the conduct of tests for Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability. This protocol applies for all varieties of the following group of the genus Citrus L. ( Rutaceae ), and their hybrids: LEMONS AND LIMES. See below for the list of species and their subgroups: Botanical taxon Sub- Common name group Citrus assamensis S. Dutta & S.C. Bhattach. LEM Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle SAL Mexican Lime Citrus aurata Risso LEM Citrus balotina Poit. & Turpin LEM Citrus bergamia Risso & Poit. SAL Citrus davaoensis (Wester) Tanaka SAL Citrus duttae Tanaka LEM Citrus excelsa Wester SAL Citrus hyalopulpa Tanaka SAL Citrus jambhiri Lush. LEM Rough Lemon (RLM) Citrus javanica Blume SAL Citrus karna Raf. LEM Citrus latifolia (Yu. Tanaka) Tanaka SAL Acid Lime (LAL) Citrus limetta Risso LEM Citrus limettioides Tanaka SAL Sweet Lime (SWL) Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f. LEM Lemon Citrus limon (L.) Burm. x C. aurantifolia HLL Lemonime (Christm.) Swing. Citrus limonia Osbeck LEM Citrus longilimon Tanaka LEM Citrus longispina Wester SAL Citrus lumia Risso & Poit.
  • US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, TILT 45W, 08/07/2012

    US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, TILT 45W, 08/07/2012

    ( UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D C 20460 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION RuhiRezaaiyan PhD Senior Regulatory Product Manager Syngenta Crop Protection LLC po BOX 18300 AUG 0 7 2012 Greensboro NC 27419 8300 Subject Tilt 45W EPA Reg No 100780 EPA Decision Number 447266 Your supplemental label submitted on March 28 2011 for post harvest use on Citrus Crop Group 10 10 Tomato and Stone Fruit DearDr Rezaaiyan The label referred to above submitted m connection with registration under the Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended is acceptable One copy of the label stamped Accepted is enclosed for your records This label supersedes all labels previously accepted for this product Please submit one copy of the final printed label before the product is released for shipment You must incorporate this supplemental label into your master label within 18 months or at your next label printing whichever comes first If you have any questions please contact Erin Malone by phone at 703 347 0253 or via email at malone enn@epa gov Sincerely Giles Parker Acting Product Manager 20 Fungicide Branch Registration Division Enclosure Stamped supplemental label Accepted r r SUPPLEMENTAL LABELING Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC P O Box 18300 ACCEPTED Greensboro North Carolina 274198300 .,,p n -, ««,« SCP Under the Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act as amended for the pesticide registered under EPA Reg No This supplemental label expires on 08/12/2015 and must not be used or distributed
  • Organic Acids in the Juice of Acid Lemon and Japanese Acid Citrus by Gas Chromatography

    Organic Acids in the Juice of Acid Lemon and Japanese Acid Citrus by Gas Chromatography

    九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository Organic Acids in the Juice of Acid Lemon and Japanese Acid Citrus by Gas Chromatography Widodo, Soesiladi E. Fruit Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University Shiraishi, Mikio Fruit Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University Shiraishi, Shinichi Fruit Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University https://doi.org/10.5109/24091 出版情報：九州大学大学院農学研究院紀要. 40 (1/2), pp.39-44, 1995-12. 九州大学農学部 バージョン： 権利関係： ,J. Fat. Agr., Kyushu IJniv., 40 (l-a), 39-44 (1995) Organic Acids in the Juice of Acid Lemon and Japanese Acid Citrus by Gas Chromatography Soesiladi E. Widodo, Mikio Shiraishi and Shinichi Shiraishi Fruit. Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 81 l-23, Japan (RWC~i/‘~?C~ C/1/?1P 15, 199<5) Acetate, glycolate, butyratc, oxalate, malonate, succinate, furnaratp, glyoxylate, malate, tattarate, cis-aconitatc and citrate were detected in the juice of Hanayu (Ci7tnt.s /ttrr/c~jrr Hart. ex Shirai), Daidai (C:. tr/i,rnt/tGt /II Linn. var. Cynthifera Y. Tanaka), Kabosu (6’. .sp/~rc:r~oc~r ~IXI Hart,. cx Tanaka), ‘Lisbon lemon (C.limon Burm. f. Lisbon) and Yuzu (C:.,jrr/ros Sieb. ex Tanaka) with compositions and contcnt,s varied according t,o sampling years and species. Citrate and rnalat,e were predominant, accounting for more than 90% and 3-9% of the total detected acids, respect.ively. The other acids presented in tracts, accounting t.ol.ally for roughly less than 0.5%. INTRODUCTION A number of chromatographic methods have been employed for determining organic acids (OAs) in citrus extracts.
  • Freeze Response of Citrus and Citrus- Speeds (Nisbitt Et Al., 2000)

    Freeze Response of Citrus and Citrus- Speeds (Nisbitt Et Al., 2000)

    HORTSCIENCE 49(8):1010–1016. 2014. and tree and grove size (Bourgeois et al., 1990; Ebel et al., 2005). Protection using microsprinklers is compromised by high wind Freeze Response of Citrus and Citrus- speeds (Nisbitt et al., 2000). Developing more cold-tolerant citrus varieties through breeding related Genotypes in a Florida Field and selection has long been considered the most effective long-term solution (Grosser Planting et al., 2000; Yelenosky, 1985). Citrus and Citrus relatives are members Sharon Inch, Ed Stover1, and Randall Driggers of the family Rutaceae. The subtribe Citrinae U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, is composed of Citrus (mandarins, oranges, Agricultural Research Service, 2001 South Rock Road, Fort Pierce, FL pummelos, grapefruits, papedas, limes, lem- ons, citrons, and sour oranges); Poncirus 34945 (deciduous trifoliate oranges); Fortunella Richard F. Lee (kumquats); Microcitrus and Eremocitrus (both Australian natives); and Clymenia National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus and Dates, U.S. (Penjor et al., 2013). There is considerable Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1060 Martin morphological and ecological variation within Luther King Boulevard, Riverside, CA 92521 this group. With Citrus, cold-hardiness ranges from cold-tolerant to cold-sensitive (Soost and Additional index words. Aurantioideae, citrus breeding, cold-sensitive, defoliation, dieback, Roose, 1996). Poncirus and Fortunella are frost damage, Rutaceae, Toddalioideae considered the most cold-tolerant genera that Abstract. A test population consisting of progenies of 92 seed-source genotypes (hereafter are cross-compatible with Citrus. Poncirus called ‘‘parent genotypes’’) of Citrus and Citrus relatives in the field in east–central trifoliata reportedly can withstand tempera- Florida was assessed after natural freeze events in the winters of 2010 and 2011.
  • Citrus from Seed?

    Citrus from Seed?

    Which citrus fruits will come true to type Orogrande, Tomatera, Fina, Nour, Hernandina, Clementard.) from seed? Ellendale Tom McClendon writes in Hardy Citrus Encore for the South East: Fortune Fremont (50% monoembryonic) “Most common citrus such as oranges, Temple grapefruit, lemons and most mandarins Ugli Umatilla are polyembryonic and will come true to Wilking type. Because most citrus have this trait, Highly polyembryonic citrus types : will mostly hybridization can be very difficult to produce nucellar polyembryonic seeds that will grow true to type. achieve…. This unique characteristic Citrus × aurantiifolia Mexican lime (Key lime, West allows amateurs to grow citrus from seed, Indian lime) something you can’t do with, say, Citrus × insitorum (×Citroncirus webberii) Citranges, such as Rusk, Troyer etc. apples.” [12*] Citrus × jambhiri ‘Rough lemon’, ‘Rangpur’ lime, ‘Otaheite’ lime Monoembryonic (don’t come true) Citrus × limettioides Palestine lime (Indian sweet lime) Citrus × microcarpa ‘Calamondin’ Meyer Lemon Citrus × paradisi Grapefruit (Marsh, Star Ruby, Nagami Kumquat Redblush, Chironja, Smooth Flat Seville) Marumi Kumquat Citrus × sinensis Sweet oranges (Blonde, navel and Pummelos blood oranges) Temple Tangor Citrus amblycarpa 'Nasnaran' mandarin Clementine Mandarin Citrus depressa ‘Shekwasha’ mandarin Citrus karna ‘Karna’, ‘Khatta’ Poncirus Trifoliata Citrus kinokuni ‘Kishu mandarin’ Citrus lycopersicaeformis ‘Kokni’ or ‘Monkey mandarin’ Polyembryonic (come true) Citrus macrophylla ‘Alemow’ Most Oranges Citrus reshni ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin Changshou Kumquat Citrus sunki (Citrus reticulata var. austera) Sour mandarin Meiwa Kumquat (mostly polyembryonic) Citrus trifoliata (Poncirus trifoliata) Trifoliate orange Most Satsumas and Tangerines The following mandarin varieties are polyembryonic: Most Lemons Dancy Most Limes Emperor Grapefruits Empress Tangelos Fairchild Kinnow Highly monoembryonic citrus types: Mediterranean (Avana, Tardivo di Ciaculli) Will produce zygotic monoembryonic seeds that will not Naartje come true to type.
  • Supplementary Material for RUSSELL, DYRANA N., JAWWAD A

    Supplementary Material for RUSSELL, DYRANA N., JAWWAD A

    Supplementary Material for RUSSELL, DYRANA N., JAWWAD A. QURESHI, SUSAN E. HALBERT AND PHILIP A. STANSLY−Host Suitability of Citrus and Zanthoxylum Spp. for Leuronota fagarae and Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psylloidea). Florida Entomologist 97(4) (December 2014) at http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse Corresponding author: Dr. J. A. Qureshi University of Florida/IFAS Southwest Florida Research and Education Center (SWFREC) 2685 SR 29N, Immokalee, Fl 34142, USA Phone: (239) 658-3400 Fax: (239) 658-3469 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Leuronota fagarae Burckhardt (Hemiptera: Psylloidea), an exotic psyllid described from South America, was first observed in 2001on a citrus relative Zanthoxylum fagara (L.) Sarg. (Sapindales: Rutaceae) in southern Florida. Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psylloidea) is principal vector of the bacteria ‘Candidatus Liberibacter spp.’ causal agent of huanglongbing (HLB) or citrus greening disease. Both vector and disease are now well established in Florida and also reported throughout the Americas and Asia. The host range of D. citri is limited to citrus and some rutaceous relatives. Additional vectors and host plants could accelerate spread of HLB in citrus and threaten endangered species such as Zanthoxylum coriaceum A. Rich. and Zanthoxylum flavum Vahl. Experiments were conducted to evaluate adult survival, reproduction and nymphal development of psyllids on 3 Citrus and 4 Zanthoxylum species as well as orange jasmine, Murraya paniculata (Syn. M. exotica) (Sapindales: Rutaceae), a common ornamental and preferred host of D. citri. Leuronota fagarae in single male−female pairs at 24 °C lived an average 4-47 days, 4-12 fold longer on Zanthoxylum spp. (except Z. flavum) than on citrus.
  • Tetraploid Citrumelo 4475 Rootstocks Improve Diploid Common

    Tetraploid Citrumelo 4475 Rootstocks Improve Diploid Common

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Tetraploid Citrumelo 4475 rootstocks improve diploid common clementine tolerance to long‑term nutrient defciency Julie Oustric1*, Stéphane Herbette2, Yann Quilichini3, Raphaël Morillon4,5, Jean Giannettini1, Liliane Berti1 & Jérémie Santini1 Nutrient defciency alters growth and the production of high‑quality nutritious food. In Citrus crops, rootstock technologies have become a key tool for enhancing tolerance to abiotic stress. The use of doubled diploid rootstocks can improve adaptation to lower nutrient inputs. This study investigated leaf structure and ultrastructure and physiological and biochemical parameters of diploid common clementine scions (C) grafted on diploid (2x) and doubled diploid (4x) Carrizo citrange (C/CC2x and C/CC4x) and Citrumelo 4475 (C/CM2x and C/CM4x) rootstocks under optimal fertigation and after 7 months of nutrient defciency. Rootstock ploidy level had no impact on structure but induced changes in the number and/or size of cells and some cell components of 2x common clementine leaves under optimal nutrition. Rootstock ploidy level did not modify gas exchanges in Carrizo citrange but induced a reduction in the leaf net photosynthetic rate in Citrumelo 4475. By assessing foliar damage, changes in photosynthetic processes and malondialdehyde accumulation, we found that C/CM4x were less afected by nutrient defciency than the other scion/rootstock combinations. Their greater tolerance to nutrient defciency was probably due to the better performance of the enzyme‑based antioxidant system. Nutrient defciency had similar impacts on C/CC2x and C/CC4x. Tolerance to nutrient defciency can therefore be improved by rootstock polyploidy but remains dependent on the rootstock genotype. Fruit crops, especially citrus fruits, require large amounts of fertilizers to ensure good production and fruit qual- ity.