DOCSLIB.ORG

Experiment and Speculation in Seventeenth-Century Italy : the Case of Geminiano Montanari

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Experiment and Speculation in Seventeenth-Century Italy : the Case of Geminiano Montanari Original citation: Vanzo, Alberto. (2016) Experiment and speculation in seventeenth-century Italy : the case of Geminiano Montanari. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 56 . pp. 52-61. Permanent WRAP url: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/75572 Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work of researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. This article is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) and may be reused according to the conditions of the license. For more details see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ A note on versions: The version presented in WRAP is the published version, or, version of record, and may be cited as it appears here. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56 (2016) 52e61 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsa Experiment and speculation in seventeenth-century Italy: The case of Geminiano Montanari Alberto Vanzo Department of Philosophy, Social Sciences Building, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: This paper reconstructs the natural philosophical method of Geminiano Montanari, one of the most Received 29 July 2015 prominent Italian natural philosophers of the late seventeenth century. Montanari’s views are used as a Received in revised form case study to assess recent claims concerning early modern experimental philosophy. Having presented 24 October 2015 the distinctive tenets of seventeenth-century experimental philosophers, I argue that Montanari adheres Available online xxx to them explicitly, thoroughly, and consistently. The study of Montanari’s views supports three claims. First, experimental philosophy was not an exclusively British phenomenon. Second, in spite of some Keywords: portrayals of experimental philosophy as an ‘atheoretical’ or ‘purely descriptive’ enterprise, experimental Corpuscularism; Experiment; philosophers could consistently endorse a variety of natural philosophical explanations and postulate Experimental philosophy; theoretical entities. Third, experimental philosophy and mechanical philosophy were not, as such, Mechanical philosophy; antagonistic. They could be consistently combined in a single philosophical enterprise. Geminiano Montanari; Ó 2015 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license Natural philosophy (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). When citing this paper, please use the full journal title Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Several recent studies on early modern natural philosophy have philosophy and mechanical philosophy were, as such, ‘antagonistic’ charted the origins and fortunes of a movement formed by self- natural philosophical views (Gaukroger, 2006, p. 254; see professed experimental philosophers, from Robert Boyle Chalmers, 2012, p. 551). (Chalmers, 2012) and John Locke (Anstey, 2011) to Irish and Scottish Having presented the distinctive views of seventeenth-century societies (Gomez, 2012; Hemmens, 2015). While a number of broad experimental philosophers (Section 1), I argue that Montanari ad- claims have been made concerning this movement, there are few heres to them explicitly, thoroughly (Section 2), and consistently detailed case studies that may enable scholars to thoroughly test (Section 3). This shows that experimental philosophy was not an those claims (esp. Anstey, 2004; Dear, 1990; Malet, 2013). This exclusively British phenomenon. It also shows that, in spite of some paper provides one such case study. It reconstructs the natural portrayals of experimental philosophy as an ‘atheoretical’2 or philosophical method of Geminiano Montanari. Not only was he ‘purely descriptive’3 enterprise, experimental philosophers could one of the most prominent natural philosophers in late consistently endorse a variety of explanations and postulate un- seventeenth-century Italy,1 but also, he discussed the method of observed, theoretical entities. I then argue that, in several of his natural philosophy in more detail than most of his peers. On the works, Montanari tightly integrates his commitments to experi- basis of my reconstruction, I assess two claims concerning early mental and mechanical philosophy (Section 4). Most notably, he modern experimental philosophy. They are the claims that exper- provides mechanistic explanations within the methodological imental philosophy was mostly a British phenomenon (e.g. Dear, 1990, p. 663; Henry, 2008, p. 55) and that experimental 2 See Boschiero (2007, pp. 70, 137, 247) on ‘atheoretical experimental science’, ‘atheoretical experimental philosophy’, ‘atheoretical experimental method’. E-mail address: [email protected]. Boschiero’s claim that the Cimento academicians were not substantively committed 1 For an overview of Montanari’s natural philosophical activity, see Heilbron to experimental philosophy is premised on the view that it was ‘atheoretical’. (2010, pp. 34-45). For a detailed discussion, see Rotta (1971). 3 Cavazza (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.001 0039-3681/Ó 2015 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). A. Vanzo / Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56 (2016) 52e61 53 framework of experimental philosophy. This demonstrates that authority and natural philosophical novatores. Descartes was a experimental and mechanical philosophy were not, as such, novator, but he was not an experimental philosopher, even though antagonistic. They could be and, in Montanari’s case, were com- he often relied on experiments. bined in a single philosophical enterprise. Another implication of [E1] concerns the attitudes of experi- mental philosophers toward substantive claims, theories, and ex- 1. Experimental natural philosophy planations. Despite the anti-theoretical proclamations of some propagandists (e.g. Glanvill, 1668, p. 89), neither [E1], nor the other Experimental natural philosophy emerged in England in the distinctive views of experimental philosophers entailed that one 1660s among authors associated with the early Royal Society should not learn natural philosophical theories and explanations (Anstey, 2005, pp. 216-220). Seventeenth-century experimental before carrying out experiments and observations, test them, or use philosophers shared at least three features.4 First, they employed a them as heuristic tools to devise new experiments and observations. distinctive rhetoric, centred around the praise of experiments and Robert Boyle, Robert Hooke, and Thomas Sprat all encouraged these ‘ observations and the criticism of speculation, that is, of the activities. In their view, the knowledg of differing Theorys, may endorsement of natural philosophical systems without sufficient admonish a man to observe divers such Circumstances in an ’ ’ empirical evidence. Experiment as otherwise tis like he would not heed (Boyle, 2001, ‘ ’ Second, experimental philosophers had common heroes and vol. 3, p. 171). It may allow one to look for facts which may prove or ‘ ’ 8 ‘ . foes. They praised ‘the Illustrious Mr. Boyle’ (Glanvill, 1668, p. 92) invalidate theories. It makes the Mind [ ] much more prompt at ’ ‘ and ‘the Immortal Lord Bacon’ (p. 72; see Sprat, 1667, p. 35), whom making Queries , discovering and searching into the true Reason of ’ they posthumously recruited as ‘the patriarck of experimental things (see Hooke, 1705a, p. 19; see Boyle, 2008 [1666], p. 2). philosophy’ (Power, 1664, p. 82). They criticized Aristotle, Epicurus, Experimental philosophy also allows for the possibility to make a the Scholastics and, especially from the 1680s onward, Descartes provisional, weak, or tentative commitment to substantive claims for developing natural philosophical theories ‘rashly’, without first and theories before carrying out experiments and observations. carrying out extensive empirical inquiries to gather ‘due informa- Among others, Sprat (1667, pp. 107-108) explicitly allowed this and tion from particulars’ (see Boyle, 2008 [1666],p.2;Glanvill, 1668,p. Boyle (1999 [1661], p. 14) stressed the provisional or tentative 9 87). status of such commitments. Experimental philosophy only pro- fi Third, experimental philosophers advocated the employment of hibits one to make a strong or rm commitment to claims and a specific method for gaining knowledge of the natural world. It can theories before carrying out extensive experiments and be summarised in five points, which I illustrate in some detail in observations. this section. In the next section, I use them as a yardstick to Positively, experimental philosophers recommended that: fi determine Montanari’s stance toward experimental philosophy. [E2] In order to make a rm commitment to substantive claims and Negatively, experimental philosophers recommended that: theories on the natural world, one should follow a two-stage pro- fi [E1] one should not firmly commit oneself to any substantive cess. During the rst stage, one should gather an extensive collec- claims or theories on the natural world, unless they are warranted tion of empirical information by means of experiments and by extensive experiments and observations.5 observations. Once this is done, one will be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marsili's Oceanographic Cruise
    APRIL 2018 P I N A R D I E T A L . 845 Measuring the Sea: Marsili’s Oceanographic Cruise (1679–80) and the Roots of Oceanography a b b c d NADIA PINARDI, EMIN ÖZSOY, MOHAMMED ABDUL LATIF, FRANCA MORONI, ALESSANDRO GRANDI, e e f GIUSEPPE MANZELLA, FEDERICO DE STROBEL, AND VLADYSLAV LYUBARTSEV a Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy b Institute of Marine Sciences, Erdemli, Mersin, Turkey c Emilia Romagna Regional Agency, Bologna, Italy d Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Bologna, Italy e Historical Oceanography Society, La Spezia, Italy f Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici, Bologna, Italy (Manuscript received 25 August 2017, in final form 3 February 2018) ABSTRACT The first in situ measurements of seawater density that referred to a geographical position at sea and time of the year were carried out by Count Luigi Ferdinando Marsili between 1679 and 1680 in the Adriatic Sea, Aegean Sea, Marmara Sea, and the Bosporus. Not only was this the first investigation with documented oceanographic mea- surements carried out at stations, but the measurements were described in such an accurate way that the authors were able to reconstruct the observations in modern units. These first measurements concern the ‘‘specific gravity’’ of seawaters (i.e., the ratio between fluid densities). The data reported in the historical oceanographic treatise Osservazioni intorno al Bosforo Tracio (Marsili) allowed the reconstruction of the seawater density at different geographic locations between 1679 and 1680. Marsili’s experimental methodology included the collection of surface and deep water samples, the analysis of the samples with a hydrostatic ampoule, and the use of a reference water to standardize the measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Philosophy and Religion in Seventeenth-Century Italy*
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PhilPapers 1 Alberto Vanzo Experimental Philosophy and Religion in Seventeenth-Century Italy* Published in Experiment, Speculation and Religion in Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Alberto Vanzo and Peter Anstey (New York: Routledge, 2019), 204–228. 1. Introduction As is well known, several English advocates of early modern experimental philosophy posited a strong connection between religion and experimental philosophy. According to Robert Boyle, Joseph Glanvill and Thomas Sprat, by practising experimental philosophy we can shed light on God’s attributes,1 will and providence (B 11: 298–299). We can draw on the discoveries of experimental philosophers to prove the existence of God and spirits,2 refute atheism, materialism, superstition and religious enthusiasm,3 and distinguish authentic miracles from fake miracles (ibid., 316). The practice of experimental philosophy leads to the worship of God4 and embodies the Christian virtues of humility, innocence and piety.5 In the light of this, early modern experimental philosophy might seem to corroborate the view that the study of nature in the seventeenth century was closely related to theology, driven by theological concerns, and pursued primarily to shed light on God. This view has been put forward by Amos Funkenstein, Stephen Gaukroger and Andrew Cunningham. According to Funkenstein (1986, 72), a ‘fusion between theology and physics’ took place in the seventeenth century. ‘Theological and physical arguments became nearly indistinguishable’ (ibid., 73). ‘[S]cience’ and ‘theology’ were ‘seen as one and the same occupation’.6 For Gaukroger (2006, 3), ‘the Scientific Revolution’ was ‘driven, often explicitly, by religious considerations’.
    [Show full text]
  • A Special Place in the History of Oceanography
    BLACK SEA OCEANOGRAPHY TThehe BosporusBosporus SStraittrait A SpecialSpecial PPlacelace inin thethe HHistoryistory ooff OOceanographyceanography Th is article has been published in Oceanography, Volume 18, Number 2, a quarterly journal of Th e Oceanography Society. Copyright 2005 by Th e Oceanography Society. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any portion of this article by photo- 16 Oceanography Vol.18, No.2, June 2005 copy machine, reposting, or other means without prior authorization of Th e Oceanography Society is strictly prohibited. Send all correspondence to: [email protected] or Th e Oceanography Society, PO Box 1931, Rockville, MD 20849-1931, USA. BY BRUNO SOFFIENTINO AND MICHAEL E.Q. PILSON The Black Sea and the Bosporus Strait hold an important place in the history of oceanography. In 1680, the impressive geographical features and remark- able current patterns of the Bosporus sparked the imagination of young Luigi Ferdinando Marsigli to solve the long-standing puzzle of two-layer fl ow. The observations and experiments were published in the 1681 book by Marsigli, originally published in Italian, Observations around the Bosporus Strait or True Canal of Constantinople, Presented in a letter to Her Sacred Royal Majesty Queen The Bosporus Strait Christina of Sweden by Luigi Ferdinando Marsigli. (This book was recently translated into English by the authors of this article.) Marsigli understood that the Bosporus currents were a simple consequence of the different water densi- ties in the Black and Mediterranean Seas. He demonstrated this density differ- ence by building a physical model that captured the salient features of the phe- nomenon (Figure 1). Marsigli made a two-compartment box with the divider connected by two openings at top and bottom, and showed that waters of dif- ferent densities in the two compartments would fl ow to the opposite side in a manner consistent with his observations.
    [Show full text]
  • RASC Toronto Centre – the Sky This Month – June 4, 2014 to July 8, 2014 by Chris Vaughan
    RASC Toronto Centre – www.rascto.ca The Sky This Month – June 4, 2014 to July 8, 2014 by Chris Vaughan NEWS Space Exploration – Public and Private Ref. http://www.spaceflightnow.com/tracking/index.html Launches June 11 pm - SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, payload six 2nd- generation Orbcomm comsats June 14 pm - Soyuz rocket from Plesetsk Cosmodrome, Russia, payload Glonass M navsat June 17 TBD - Orbital Science Antares rocket from Wallops Island, Virginia, payload 3rd Cygnus cargo freighter on 2nd operational flight to ISS June TBD - Ariane 5 rocket from Kourou, French Guiana, payload Measat 3b and Optus 10 comsats June TBD - Polar Sat Launch Vehicle from Satish Dhawan Space Center, Sriharikota, India, payload Spot 7 remote sensing sat June 19 pm - ICS Kosmotras Dnepr rocket from Dombarovsky, Russia, payload Earth observation sats June 20 pm - Proton rocket from Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan, secretive payload reportedly known as Olymp or Luch June 25 TBD - Angara rocket from Plesetsk Cosmodrome, Russia, suborbital demonstration flight June 28 TBD - Soyuz rocket from Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan, payload Meteor M2 weather sat and others July TBD - SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, payload AsiaSat 8 comsat July 1 am - United Launch Alliance Delta 2 rocket from Vandenberg Air Force Base, Ca, payload Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 satellite for NASA New Hubble Ultra Deep Field 2014 Area between Fornax and Eridanus (RA. 3h32m38.5s Dec -27°47’00“). It’s comprised of ~600 hours of exposure, from July 2002 to Sep 2012. Hubble instruments include the Advanced Camera for Surveys (far-UV to visible) and the Wide Field Camera 3 (High res near-IR, visible, and near-UV).
    [Show full text]
  • Gordon Myers AAVSO Speakers Bureau ALCON 2009
    Gordon Myers AAVSO Speakers Bureau ALCON 2009 ! David Fabricius discovered “omicron ceti” in 1596 " BriGHtened from 3rd to 2nd maGnitude, tHen disappeared – tHouGHt to be nova. (Actually disappears from view varyinG from 2nd to 9th magnitude) " Re-observed in 1609 by Fabricius, and re-discovered in 1631 by JoHann Fokkens Holwarda wHo determined 11 montH period " JoHannes Hevelius observed in 1639 and 1642, and named tHe star “Mira” – The Wonderful ! Earlier ancient discovery records unclear. HipparcHus may Have discovered Mira in 134 BC ! As an aside - Fabricius and His son JoHannes discovered sunspots before Galileo (1611)! ! Geminiano Montanari discovered “beta Perseii” in 1667 " BriGHtness varies from 2.1 to 3.4 maGnitude in 2.87 days " Period of less tHan 3 days credited to JoHn Goodricke in 1782-83 " In 1881 Edward PickerinG tHeorized (correctly) tHat it was an eclipsinG binary star system ! European, Arab, and CHinese cultures knew its variability and considered it evil " “Demon’s Head” – Arab " “MiscHief-maker” – Arab " “Satan’s Head” – Hebrew " “LilitH” – Adam’s leGendary demonic first wife – Babylon/Hebrew " “THe Spectre’s Head” - Europe " “Piled-up Corpses” - CHinese HST ImaGe of ! CHinese astronomers Have tHe first SN 1054 recorded Histories of supernova " Over 20 candidates identified over tHe past 2000 years. " Confirmed dates include 185, 393, 1006 (briGHtest and also recorded in EGypt, Iraq, Italy, Japan and Switzerland), 1054 (Crab nebula remnant sHown above) ! In 1572 TycHo BraHe observed SN 1572 and argued it was very far
    [Show full text]
  • Printing Natural Knowledge
    Chapter 3: Printing Natural Knowledge “The purpose of writing may be to persuade the wise and intelligent; or else it may be to persuade everyone in town.” So wrote Giovanni Alfonso Borelli, pro- fessor at the university of Pisa and already the author of an important work on Euclid, to his ex-colleague Marcello Malpighi, just starting out on the faculty at the university of Bologna and about to publish his fundamental work revealing the microstructure of the lungs. Deciding what to publish, and for whom, was no easy matter, still some thirty years after the twin trials of Orazio Morandi and Galileo Galilei. “But if you choose to write to the common citizens of Bo- logna to persuade them about the calumnies made against truth,” Borelli con- tinued, “I conceive that in this case you may use every effort to deride any per- son who peddles a pile of idiocies just to offend virtuous and meritorious people.” 1 Of course, for Borelli, “virtuous and meritorious people” meant per- sons who followed empirical method for the study of nature, exemplified by Galileo; and “truth” meant the truth drawn from the use of that method. “Idio- cies” meant ideas conceived by those whom the Galileians conceived as dogma- tists and mystifiers. Still in the 1660s, whether Galileo’s disciples and their followers would triumph against the dogmatists and mystifiers was by no means clear. The story of their campaign to capture public attention, with all its fits and starts, is far less well known than the content of their ideas. It will occupy us here.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiment and Speculation in Seventeenth-Century Italy: the Case of Geminiano Montanari
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56 (2016) 52e61 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsa Experiment and speculation in seventeenth-century Italy: The case of Geminiano Montanari Alberto Vanzo Department of Philosophy, Social Sciences Building, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: This paper reconstructs the natural philosophical method of Geminiano Montanari, one of the most Received 29 July 2015 prominent Italian natural philosophers of the late seventeenth century. Montanari’s views are used as a Received in revised form case study to assess recent claims concerning early modern experimental philosophy. Having presented 24 October 2015 the distinctive tenets of seventeenth-century experimental philosophers, I argue that Montanari adheres Available online 22 December 2015 to them explicitly, thoroughly, and consistently. The study of Montanari’s views supports three claims. First, experimental philosophy was not an exclusively British phenomenon. Second, in spite of some Keywords: portrayals of experimental philosophy as an ‘atheoretical’ or ‘purely descriptive’ enterprise, experimental Corpuscularism; Experiment; philosophers could consistently endorse a variety of natural philosophical explanations and postulate Experimental philosophy; theoretical entities. Third, experimental philosophy and mechanical philosophy were not, as such, Mechanical philosophy; antagonistic.
    [Show full text]
  • Gian Rinaldo Carli (1720-1795): a Remarkable Early 'Money Doctor' [First Draft]
    Gian Rinaldo Carli (1720-1795): a remarkable early 'money doctor' [First draft] Gianfranco Tusset 1. Introduction “Some mathematicians maintained that money is like water, which flows and swirls around until it finds its equilibrium again: the matter is totally different, especially in Italy” (Carli 1751, 164-165). This quotation from one of Gian Rinaldo Carli’s main works, Dell’origine e del commercio delle monete e dei disordini che accadono nelle alterazioni di essa (Of the origin and trade of the coins and the disorders that occur in its alterations) (1751), clearly points to his focus on the conditions in which money circulates in order to guarantee the monetary equilibrium. Aim of this paper is to reconstruct the figure of Gian Rinaldo Carli, a monetarist economist who lived in the eighteenth-century, and whose work mirrored contradictions and strains that characterized the decades preceding the industrial burst. Belonging to a community of monetarist economists who enlivened a sort of golden age of the pre-classical studies on money, Carli stood out for is persistent focus on the need of guaranteeing monetary equilibrium, of intervening to assure conditions favorable to enlarge trade, at that time considered the main factor of growth. The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 lingers over the eighteenth-century monetarist community as whole. Section 3 introduces some biographical notes on Gian Rinaldo Carli. Section 4 concerns the method Carli employed to deal with monetary topics. Section 5 presents the Carli's general view on monetary equilibrium. Section 6 reviews his researches on then increasing prices. Section 6 details threats to international monetary equilibrium and potential remedies.
    [Show full text]
  • Laura Bassi Et Adriana Fiorentini: Réalisations Et Difficultés De Deux Dames Italiennes Dans Les Sciences, Au 18Ème Et Au 20Ème Siècle
    Laura Bassi et Adriana Fiorentini: réalisations et difficultés de deux dames italiennes dans les sciences, au 18ème et au 20ème siècle Marco Piccolino National Institute of Neurosciences, Université de Ferrara, Italie marcopiccolino.org [email protected] In the background of Laura Bassi’s events: The crisis of the Bologna University in the 17° century The «Galileo affair» The Dialogo was published in 1632, with the Vatican approval, and soon (1633) put in the Index librorum Prohibitorum, where it remained until 1834 Galileo Galilei (1564 ‐1642) It was the beginning of a complex and difficult historical phase in the relations between catholic church and culture and science, already deteriorated as a consequence of the Counterreformation In Bologna, in the second half of the XVII century, despite a general stagnation of the University (the ancient and glorious Studium), modern scientific and humanistic cultures were kept alive by a series of more or less private academies or private schools, promoted by scholars of the university (the so-called novatores), enlightened aristocrats and also liberal prelates Among the last ones, Anton Felice Marsili, the member of a noble family of the city, who was appointed as Archdeacon of the Cathedral, a function which included among its prerogatives also the role of Chancellor of the University. Marsili, who ruled two academies (one of religious studies and another of experimental philosophy - i.e. science), tried unsuccessfully to reform the University and introduce modern attitudes in both cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpuscularism and Experimental Philosophy in Domenico Guglielmini‘S Reflections on Salts1
    1 Alberto Vanzo Corpuscularism and Experimental Philosophy in Domenico Guglielmini‘s Reflections on Salts1 Published in The Idea of Principles in Early Modern Thought: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. Peter Anstey (New York: Routledge, 2017), 147-171 Natural.philosophical novatores in late seventeenth-century 0taly typically endorsed a corpuscularist view of principles 2hey claimed that natural philosophy should identify the causes or principles of natural phenomena and they identified those principles either with corpuscles, or with motion and matter, which in turn consists of corpuscles Yet, several 0talian novatores were also adherents of early modern experimental philosophy, that recent studies have portrayed as being incompatible with corpuscularism 2his raises the question of whether early modern philosophers could consistently endorse both a corpuscularist doctrine of principles and the tenets of experimental philosophy. 2his paper addresses this question by examining Domenico Guglielmini‘s Philosophical Reflections derived from the Figures of Salts (1688) 2 0n this treatise on crystallography, Guglielmini puts forward a corpuscularist theory and he defends it in a way that is in line with the methodological prescriptions, epistemological strictures, and preferred argumentative styles of experimental philosophers 2he examination of the Reflections shows that early modern philosophers could consistently endorse, at the same time, both experimental philosophy and a corpuscularist doctrine of principles 2he paper starts by explaining what 0 understand by experimental philosophy and corpuscularism 0 then show that a corpuscularist doctrine of principles was widely accepted among late seventeenth-century 0talian novatores, although most practitioners refrained from highlighting it or defending it explicitly 6e will then turn to the main corpuscularist claim of the Reflections and its methodological preface, that explicitly endorses experimental 2 philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpuscularism and Experimental Philosophy in Domenico Guglielmini’S Reflections on Crystals1
    Manuscript version: Author’s Accepted Manuscript The version presented in WRAP is the author’s accepted manuscript and may differ from the published version or Version of Record. Persistent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/87123 How to cite: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it. Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Publisher’s statement: Please refer to the repository item page, publisher’s statement section, for further information. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected]. warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications 1 Alberto Vanzo Corpuscularism and Experimental Philosophy in Domenico Guglielmini’s Reflections on Crystals1 Forthcoming in The Idea of Principles in Early Modern Thought: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Institutions in Late 17Th-Century and Early 18Th-Century Italy
    1 The Young and the Restless: Scientific Institutions in late 17th-century and early 18th-century Italy 1. Introduction In the second half of the seventeenth century, a generation after Galileo, Europe experienced the organization of science; the rise of scientific institutions. Historians generally agree that during this period, knowledge was gained through group collaboration rather than outstanding individual work of the type achieved by Galileo or Descartes. This is supposedly exemplified in the experimental programs conducted within the controlled and objective environments of the organizations formed inside royal and princely courts in many parts of Europe.1 Additionally, traditional, as well as several recent writings, have asserted that the formation of scientific institutions also signaled the birth of a ‘new’ science, a modern and inductive method for acquiring factual knowledge free from theoretical speculation and contention. This paper is an attempt to analyze the foundations and workings of some of these institutions in Italy that supposedly represent the birth of modern experimental science, focusing on the efforts of the Accademia degli Inquieti (1690-1714) to establish its reputation and to gain funding from the Bolognese Senate and the Papal Court. I will begin by examining the claims made by historians since the eighteenth century regarding the aims and interests of the first scientific institutions and their patrons. The subsequent case studies pertaining to the Accademia del Cimento, the Accademia della Traccia, and especially the Accademia degli Inquieti will aim to show the political and intellectual 1 Recent publications to have examined these courtly environments for producing natural knowledge within an institutional setting, include: S.
    [Show full text]