Hypertensive Urgency (Asymptomatic Severe Hypertension): Considerations for Management
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Control Study of Pregnancy Complications and Birth Outcomes
Hypertension Research (2011) 34, 55–61 & 2011 The Japanese Society of Hypertension All rights reserved 0916-9636/11 $32.00 www.nature.com/hr ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hypotension in pregnant women: a population-based case–control study of pregnancy complications and birth outcomes Ferenc Ba´nhidy1,Na´ndor A´ cs1, Erzse´bet H Puho´ 2 and Andrew E Czeizel2 Hypotension is frequent in pregnant women; nevertheless, its association with pregnancy complications and birth outcomes has not been investigated. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the possible association of hypotension in pregnant women with pregnancy complications and with the risk for preterm birth, low birthweight and different congenital abnormalities (CAs) in the children of these mothers in the population-based data set of the Hungarian Case–Control Surveillance of CAs, 1980–1996. Prospectively and medically recorded hypotension was evaluated in 537 pregnant women who later had offspring with CAs (case group) and 1268 pregnant women with hypotension who later delivered newborn infants without CAs (control group); controls were matched to sex and birth week of cases (in the year when cases were born), in addition to residence of mothers. Over half of the pregnant women who had chronic hypotension were treated with pholedrine or ephedrine. Maternal hypotension is protective against preeclampsia; however, hypotensive pregnant women were at higher risk for severe nausea or vomiting, threatened abortion (hemorrhage in early pregnancy) and for anemia. There was no clinically important difference in the rate of preterm births and low birthweight newborns in pregnant women with or without hypotension. The comparison of the rate of maternal hypotension in cases with 23 different CAs and their matched controls did not show a higher risk for CAs (adjusted OR with 95% confidence intervals: 0.66, 0.49–0.84). -
Aortic Thrombus Causing a Hypertensive Emergency
CASE REPORT Aortic Thrombus Causing a Hypertensive Emergency Kraftin E. Schreyer, MD*† *Temple University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Philadelphia, Jenna Otter, MD* Pennsylvania Zachary Johnston, BS† †Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Section Editor: Rick A. McPheeters, DO Submission history: Submitted February 9, 2017; Revision received June 27, 2017; Accepted June 28, 2017 Electronically published November 3, 2017 Full text available through open access at http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_cpcem DOI: 10.5811/cpcem.2017.6.33876 Thoracic aorta thrombi are a rare condition typically presenting as a source for distal embolization in elderly patients with atherosclerotic risk factors. However, young patients with a variety of presentations resulting from such thrombi have rarely been reported. We describe a case of a young patient with refractory hypertensive emergency caused by a large thoracic aorta thrombus. Investigation was guided by abnormal physical exam findings. [Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med.2017;1(4):387–390.] INTRODUCTION supine positioning. It had progressively worsened over the Thoracic aorta thrombi are exceedingly rare. When they course of one day and was associated with chest pain, do occur, they typically present as a source of distal subjective fever, and cough productive of blood-tinged embolization, clinically resulting in stroke, transient sputum. According to the patient, he had experienced similar ischemic attack, or arterial embolization of an extremity. symptoms when he was diagnosed with PJP pneumonia. Diagnosis of thoracic aorta thrombi is often made in older On initial exam, the patient had a blood pressure (BP) of patients with atherosclerotic risk factors or known 247/128 mmHg, pulse of 135 beats per minute, and an aneurysmal or atherosclerotic disease.1,2 Thrombi have also oxygen saturation of 86% on room air. -
TRANDATE® (Labetalol Hydrochloride) Tablets
NDA 18716/S-026 Page 2 PRODUCT INFORMATION TRANDATE® (labetalol hydrochloride) Tablets DESCRIPTION: Trandate Tablets are adrenergic receptor blocking agents that have both selective alpha1-adrenergic and nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blocking actions in a single substance. Labetalol hydrochloride (HCl) is a racemate chemically designated as 2-hydroxy-5-[1-hydroxy-2-[(1 methyl-3-phenylpropyl)amino]ethyl]benzamide monohydrochloride, and it has the following structure: Labetalol HCl has the empirical formula C19H24N2O3•HCl and a molecular weight of 364.9. It has two asymmetric centers and therefore exists as a molecular complex of two diastereoisomeric pairs. Dilevalol, the R,R′ stereoisomer, makes up 25% of racemic labetalol. Labetalol HCl is a white or off-white crystalline powder, soluble in water. Trandate Tablets contain 100, 200, or 300 mg of labetalol HCl and are taken orally. The tablets also contain the inactive ingredients corn starch, FD&C Yellow No. 6 (100- and 300-mg tablets only), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, lactose, magnesium stearate, pregelatinized corn starch, sodium benzoate (200-mg tablet only), talc (100-mg tablet only), and titanium dioxide. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY: Labetalol HCl combines both selective, competitive, alpha1-adrenergic blocking and nonselective, competitive, beta-adrenergic blocking activity in a single substance. In man, the ratios of alpha- to beta-blockade have been estimated to be approximately 1:3 and 1:7 following oral and intravenous (IV) administration, respectively. Beta2-agonist activity has been demonstrated in animals with minimal beta1-agonist (ISA) activity detected. In animals, at doses greater than those required for alpha- or beta-adrenergic blockade, a membrane stabilizing effect has been demonstrated. -
Pain Management Opioid Safety a Quick Reference Guide (2014)
Pain Management Opioid Safety A Quick Reference Guide (2014) VA Academic Detailing Service Real Provider Resources Real Patient Results Your Partner in Enhancing Veteran Health Outcomes VA Academic Detailing Service Email Group: [email protected] VA Academic Detailing Service SharePoint Site: https://vaww.portal2.va.gov/sites/ad Opioids: A Practical Guide for Clinicians Example Risk Assessment Tool: Opioid Risk Tool (ORT)1 Item Score if Female Item Score if Male Alcohol 1 3 1. Family history of substance abuse Illegal drugs 2 3 Prescription drugs 4 4 Alcohol 3 3 2. Personal history of substance abuse Illegal drugs 4 4 Prescription drugs 5 5 3. Age (mark box if 16–45) 1 1 4. History of preadolescent sexual abuse 3 0 Attention deficit disorder obsessive compulsive disorder 2 2 5. Psychological disease Bipolar Schizophrenia Depression 1 1 Total Risk Category: 0–3 Low Risk of aberrant behaviors; 4–7 Moderate Risk of aberrant behaviors; ≥8 High Risk of aberrant behaviors Assess risk of aberrant behaviors before initiating opioid medications; the ORT or other rating tools can assist with this process but can overestimate risk thus should not be used as only reason to decline opioid prescription. 1 Opioids Risk Classification10-11 Risk Condition/Situation • Diagnosis with concordant physical exam, medical imaging, laboratory findings • High levels of pain acceptance and active coping strategies Low • Well motivated patient willing to participate in multimodal treatment plan (no moderate to high risk • Attempting to function -
New Zealand Data Sheet 1. Product Name
NEW ZEALAND DATA SHEET 1. PRODUCT NAME Norvir 100 mg tablets. 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each film-coated tablet contains 100 mg ritonavir. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM White film-coated oval tablets debossed with the corporate Abbott "A" logo and the Abbott-Code “NK”. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications NORVIR is indicated for use in combination with appropriate antiretroviral agents or as monotherapy if combination therapy is inappropriate, for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults and children aged 12 years and older. For persons with advanced HIV disease, the indication for ritonavir is based on the results for one study that showed a reduction in both mortality and AIDS defining clinical events for patients who received ritonavir. Median duration of follow-up in this study was 6 months. The clinical benefit from ritonavir for longer periods of treatment is unknown. For persons with less advanced disease, the indication is based on changes in surrogate markers in controlled trials of up to 16 weeks duration (see section 5.1 Pharmacodynamic properties). 4.2 Dose and method of administration General Dosing Guidelines Prescribers should consult the full product information and clinical study information of protease inhibitors if they are co-administered with a reduced dose of ritonavir. The recommended dose of NORVIR is 600 mg (six tablets) twice daily by mouth, and should be given with food. NORVIR tablets should be swallowed whole and not chewed, broken or crushed. NORVIR DS 29 April 2020 Page 1 of 37 Version 35 Paediatric population Ritonavir has not been studied in patients below the age of 12 years; hence the safety and efficacy of ritonavir in children below the age of 12 have not been established. -
Have Already Been Described to Occur with Some
804 Letters, Correspondence, Book reviews have already been described to occur with Correspondence to: Dr D Michel, Service de Neu- some mutations. rologie, Hôpital de Bellevue, 42055 Saint-Etienne, There are only two previous reports Cedex 2, France. relating to three pairs of identical twins with CMT and known genetic defects. In the two 1 Goldsmith P, Rowe D, Jäger R, et al. Focal ver- pairs with the 17p11.2 duplication there was tebral artery dissection causing Brown- remarkable clinical variability.6 We have also Séquard’s syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psy- seen a pair of identical twins with a P0 muta- chiatry 1998;64:415–16. 2 Gutowski NJ, Murphy RP, Beale DJ. Unilateral tion in whom there was marked variability in upper cervical posterior spinal artery syndrome early ages (unpublished data). Apart from the following sneezing. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychia- asymmetry of toe responses in one of the try 1992;55:841–3. probands, the genetically identical twins 3 Bergqvist CAG, Goldberg HI, Thorarensen O, et al. Posterior cervical spinal cord infarction described here are phenotypically very simi- following vertebral artery dissection. Neurology lar, suggesting that the expression of this 1997;48:1112–5. mutation was not influenced by other non- 4 Hundsberger T, Thömke F, Hopf HC, et al. genetic factors. Symmetrical infarction of the cervical spinal cord due to spontaneous bilateral vertebral Codon 39 seems to be of particular Sagittal T2 weighted MRI of the cervicodorsal artery dissection. Stroke 1998;29:1742. importance to Cx32 protein function as cord : high linear signal extending from C4 to 5 Masson C. -
Adrenoceptors Regulating Cholinergic Activity in the Guinea-Pig Ileum 1978) G.M
- + ! ,' Br. J. Pharmac. (1978), 64, 293-300. F'(O t.,," e reab- ,ellular PHARMACOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PRESYNAPTIC _-ADRENOCEPTORS REGULATING CHOLINERGIC ACTIVITY IN THE GUINEA-PIG ILEUM 1978) G.M. Departmentof Pharmacology,Allen and HzmburysResearchLimited, Ware, Hertfordshire,SG12 ODJ I The presynaptic ct-adrenoceptors located on the terminals of the cholinergic nerves of the guinea- pig myenteric plexus have been characterized according to their sensitivities to at-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists. 2 Electrical stimulation of the cholinergic nerves supplying the longitudinal muscle of the guinea-pig ! ileum caused a twitch response. Clonidine caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of the twitch i response; the maximum inhibition obtained was 80 to 95_o of the twitch response. Oxymetazoline and xylazine were qualitatively similar to clonidine but were about 5 times less potent. Phenylephrine and methoxamine also inhibited the twitch response but were at least 10,000 times less potent than clonidine. 3 The twitch-inhibitory effects of clonidine, oxymetazoline and xylazine, but not those of phenyl- ephrine or methoxamine, were reversed by piperoxan (0.3 to 1.0 lag/ml). 4 Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) inhibited the twitch response, but also increased the basal tone of the ileum. Mepyramine prevented the increase in tone but did not affect the inhibitory action of LSD. Piperoxan or phentolamine only partially antagonized the inhibitory effect of LSD. 5 Phentolamine, yohimbine, piperoxan and tolazoline were potent, competitive antagonists of the inhibitory effect of clonidine with pA2 values of 8.51, 7.78, 7.64 and 6.57 respectively. 6 Thymoxamine was a weak antagonist of clonidine; it also antagonized the twitch-inhibitory effect of morphine. -
Spinal Cord Injury Manual
Spinal Cord Injury Manual A publication of the Regional Spinal Cord Injury Center of the Delaware Valley The Regional Spinal Cord Injury Center of the Delaware Valley provides a comprehensive program of patient care, community education, and research. It is a federally designated program of Thomas Jefferson University and its affiliated institutions of Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Magee Rehabilitation Hospital. JG 10-1325 Spinal Cord Injury Patient-Family Teaching Manual A Publication of the Regional Spinal Cord Injury Center of the Delaware Valley Researched and prepared by the clinical personnel of Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Magee Rehabilitation Hospital Available online at: www.spinalcordcenter.org © 1993, 2001, 2009 Thomas Jefferson University. This publication is the property of Thomas Jefferson University. All rights reserved. This Manual is intended for use in a total system of care that meets all applicable CARF standards for SCI Centers. Neither Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, nor Magee Rehabilitation Hospital is responsible for any liability, claims, demands or damages asserted to be the result, either directly or indirectly, of the information contained herein. The use or reprinting of any part of this manual requires the express permission of Thomas Jefferson University. 3.11.10 3.11.10 Dedication The Handbook Committee of the RSCICDV gratefully acknowledges the assistance and dedication of all who contributed to this manual, and all the others who worked so hard to make this Handbook a reality. -
Hypertensive Emergency
Presentation of hypertensive emergency Definitions surrounding hypertensive emergency Hypertension: elevated blood pressure (BP), usually defined as BP >140/90; pathological both in isolation and in association with other cardiovascular risk factors Severe hypertension: systolic BP (SBP) >200 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) >120 mmHg Hypertensive urgency: severe hypertension with no evidence of acute end organ damage Hypertensive emergency: severe hypertension with evidence of acute end organ damage Malignant/accelerated hypertension: a hypertensive emergency involving retinal vascular damage Causes of hypertensive emergency Usually inadequate treatment and/or poor compliance in known hypertension, the causes of which include: Essential hypertension o Age o Family history o Salt o Alcohol o Caffeine o Smoking o Obesity Secondary hypertension o Renal . Renal artery stenosis . Glomerulonephritis . Chonic pyelonephritis . Polycystic kidney disease o Endocrine . Cushing’s syndrome . Conn’s syndrome . Acromegaly . Hyperthyroidism . Phaeochromocytoma o Arterial . Coarctation of the aorta o Drugs . Alcohol . Cocaine . Amphetamines o Pregnancy . Pre-eclamplsia Pathophysiology of hypertensive emergency Abrupt rise in systemic vascular resistance Failure of normal autoregulatory mechanisms Fibrinoid necrosis of arterioles Damage to red blood cells from fibrin deposits causing microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia Microscopic haemorrhage Macroscopic haemorrhage Clinical features of hypertensive emergency Hypertensive encephalopathy o -
Urine Drug Testing – Ordering and Interpretation The
URINE DRUG TESTING – ORDERING AND INTERPRETATION Created by: Dr. Daniel Berland, M.D. THE TESTS Enzyme linked immunoassay (EIA) kits • Screening test for illicit substances amphetamine/methamphetamine, (marijuana, PCP, cocaine, “opiates” (morphine/codeine) • Inexpensive, fast, point of care or lab • Detects class of substance, not specific medication • Will be negative for hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, methadone, buprenorphine, benzodiazepines (particularly clonazepam) unless specific test kit for those meds is in use. Ask your lab! • High false positive rates caused by numerous prescribed or OTC meds Gas chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy (GCMS) • More expensive, labor intensive • Confirming test identifies specific meds and their metabolites. Use to confirm patient is taking prescribed meds and not taking non-prescribed meds • High sensitivity, but you must tell the lab what you seek (patient is taking) • False positives still occur ** Human Urine: T ~98 deg; > 90 deg for 15 min. pH 4.5-8; SG 1.002-1.03. Ur Cr > 20 mg/dL ** WHAT TO ORDER • Test for illicit drug use: EIA • Test to confirm taking prescribed meds: GCMS (EIA is OK if your lab runs the test for each med – they usually do not – ask!) • Test to check for use of non-prescribed medication: GCMS POSSIBLE OUTCOMES OF TESTING • Presence of illicit substance: Use by patient; false result related to prescribed or OTC med exposure • Presence of non-prescribed medication: Illicit use by patient; false positive testing – cross-reaction or possible known metabolite (e.g., morphine -
Management of Postnatal Hypertension - Top Tips
Management of postnatal hypertension - top tips FOLLOW UP PLAN Follow up Hypertensive disorder Chronic Gestational Pre - Severe pre- hypertension hypertension eclampsia eclampsia/ Mild/ HELLP/ Moderate Eclampsia Initial follow up Community midwife and general practitioner BP frequency At least once 3- At least once Every 1-2 days for 2 wks 5 days post 3-5 days post as above birth then as birth clinically Then as indicated clinically indicated Acceptable BP Aim BP should be <150/100 mmHg. BP <140/90 If not on antihypertensives commence if BP≥ 150/100 Suitable Labetalol, nifedipine, enalapril, atenolol, antihypertensives AVOID DIURETICS STOP METHYLDOPA WITHIN 2 DAYS OF DELIVERY When to reduce/ NA If BP<130/80 If BP<130/80 reduce stop If not seen reduce antihypertensive before needs If BP < 140/ If BP <140/ 90 consider GP review at 90 consider reducing 2wks post birth reducing Convert back to If not seen prepregnancy before needs antihypertensive GP review at as indicated 2wks post birth 6 weeks GP/ pre GP GP Hospital cons follow up pregnancy care clinic team POSTNATAL REVIEW AT POSTNATAL REVIEW 6-8 weeks after birth Offer medical review Offer specialist assessment if antihypertensives still needed Rpt Plt, transaminases, creatinine if indicated Carry out urine dipstick test If proteinuria still ≥ 1+ offer further review at 3 months to assess kidney function – consider offering renal referral. Give advice re: recurrence risks – see table below: Advise women to maintain BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 H.Yeeles/S. Rutter July 14 Management of postnatal -
Orthostatic Hypotension in a Cohort of Hypertensive Patients Referring to a Hypertension Clinic
Journal of Human Hypertension (2015) 29, 599–603 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9240/15 www.nature.com/jhh ORIGINAL ARTICLE Orthostatic hypotension in a cohort of hypertensive patients referring to a hypertension clinic C Di Stefano, V Milazzo, S Totaro, G Sobrero, A Ravera, A Milan, S Maule and F Veglio The prevalence of orthostatic hypotension (OH) in hypertensive patients ranges from 3 to 26%. Drugs are a common cause of non-neurogenic OH. In the present study, we retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 9242 patients with essential hypertension referred to our Hypertension Unit. We analysed data on supine and standing blood pressure values, age, sex, severity of hypertension and therapeutic associations of drugs, commonly used in the treatment of hypertension. OH was present in 957 patients (10.4%). Drug combinations including α-blockers, centrally acting drugs, non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers and diuretics were associated with OH. These pharmacological associations must be administered with caution, especially in hypertensive patients at high risk of OH (elderly or with severe and uncontrolled hypertension). Angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) seems to be not related with OH and may have a potential protective effect on the development of OH. Journal of Human Hypertension (2015) 29, 599–603; doi:10.1038/jhh.2014.130; published online 29 January 2015 INTRODUCTION stabilization, and then at 1 and 3 min after standing. The average of the Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is defined as the reduction in blood last two SBP and DBP values measured in the supine position and the pressure (BP) of at least 20 mmHg systolic and/or 10 mm Hg lowest value during standing were considered.