DOCSLIB.ORG

Lithobates Catesbeianus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lithobates Catesbeianus Risk Assessment of Lithobates catesbeianus Name of Organism: Lithobates catesbeianus Shaw, 1802 - American Bullfrog Objective: Assess the risks associated with this species in Ireland Version: Final 15/09/2014 Author(s) Erin O’Rourke, Colette O’Flynn Expert reviewer John Wilkinson Stage 1 - Organism Information Stage 2 - Detailed Assessment Section A - Entry Section B - Establishment Section C - Spread Section D - Impact Section E - Conclusion Section F - Additional Questions About the risk assessment This risk assessment is based on the Non-native species AP plication based Risk Analysis (NAPRA) tool (version 2.66). NAPRA is a computer based tool for undertaking risk assessment of any non- native species. It was developed by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation (EPPO) and adapted for Ireland and Northern Ireland by Invasive Species Ireland. It is based on the Computer Aided Pest Risk Analysis (CAPRA) software package which is a similar tool used by EPPO for risk assessment. Notes: Confidence is rated as low, medium, high or very high. Likelihood is rated as very unlikely, unlikely, moderately likely, likely or very likely. The percentage categories are 0% - 10%, 11% - 33%, 34% - 67%, 68% - 90% or 91% - 100%. N/A = not applicable. This is a joint project by Inland Fisheries Ireland and the National Biodiversity Data Centre to inform risk assessments of non-native species for the European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations 2011. It is supported by the National Parks and Wildlife Service. Page 1 of 22 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Name of Document: Risk Assessment of Lithobates catesbeianus Author (s): Dr Erin O’Rourke and Ms. Colette O’Flynn Authorised Officer: Dr Liam Lysaght Description of Content: Non-native species risk assessment Approved by: Dr Liam Lysaght Date of Approval: 15/09/2014 Assigned review period: n/a Date of next review: n/a Document Code n/a TOC Text List of List of Figures No. This documents comprises tables Appendices n/a YES n/a n/a n/a Version Control Table Version No. Status Authors(s) Reviewed by Approved by Date of issue Draft 1 Complete Dr Erin O’Rourke Ms Colette 24/01/2014 O’Flynn Expert review Complete Dr Erin O’Rourke Dr John Dr Liam 30/01/2014 Wilkinson Lysaght Public Complete Dr Erin O’Rourke Dr Liam 09/05/2014 consultation Lysaght Public Complete Dr Erin O’Rourke Dr Liam 14/08/2014 consultation 2 Lysaght Final Complete Dr Erin O’Rourke Dr Liam 15/09/2014 Lysaght Page 2 of 22 Stage 1 - Organism Information The aim of this section is to gather basic information about the organism. N QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENT 1 What is the reason for performing the risk A risk assessment is required as this species is listed as a "Non-native species subject assessment? to restrictions under Regulations 49 and 50" in the Third Schedule of the European - Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations 2011, SI 477/2011. 2 Identify the organism. Is it clearly a single Lithobates catesbeianus Shaw, 1802 - American bullfrog taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the Taxonomy: same rank? Phylum: Chordata (mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, birds) Class: Amphibia Order: Anura YES Family: Ranidae Genus: Lithobates Species: catesbeianus Synonym: Rana catesbeiana (Shaw, 1802) Common name (English): Bullfrog, Common bullfrog (Santos -Barrera et al ., 2009) . 3 If not a single taxonomic entity, can it be redefined? (if necessary use the response N/A box to re-define the organism and carry on) 4 Describe the organism. The American bullfrog is a distinctive, large-bodied anuran. It has a typical snout-vent length of 90-152 mm (maximum length 200 mm) and a body weight up to 0.5 kg (Conant 1975; Lorvelec and Detaint, 2009). The posterior legs are robust and long, representing up to 50% of total body length, and up to 40% of total body weight, whilst the anterior limbs are short (CABI, 2014). The adult dorsum (upper side) varies in colouration from pale green, dark olive to brownish and can have brown blotches; the head, which is wide and flat, is lighter green, and the legs are blotched or banded (CABI, 2014). The ventral side is white, grey or yellowish (CABI, 2014; GISD, 2009). The species have large, conspicuous tympanic membranes (eardrums), which have a dark outer ring (Conant - 1975). The skin is mostly smooth, with no dorsolateral folds, but has a skin fold, from around the ear to the base of the forelegs (Conant 1975). As they mature they become sexually dimorphic. In males, the upper abdomen (chin and throat) temporally develops yellow skin pigments and the tympanic membranes enlarge to several times the diameter of the eye (CABI, 2014). Males are also smaller than females. Mature females retain the morphology and colouration of the juvenile stage (CABI, 2014). Tadpoles are greenish or brownish with small spots, grow up to 150 mm and can take from 12 to 48 months to reach metamorphosis (Conant 1975). The adult male produces the advertisement call. Page 3 of 22 Stage 1 - Organism Information The aim of this section is to gather basic information about the organism. N QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENT 5 Does a relevant earlier risk assessment In Ireland, a preliminary risk assessment was previously carried out. This was a exist? (give details of any previous risk prioritisation risk assessment as part of the Risk Analysis and Prioritisation for Invasive assessment for Ireland) YES and Non-native Species in Ireland and Northern Ireland (ISI, 2012). It designated Lithobates catesbeianus as a “high risk” invasive species. 6 If there is an earlier Risk Assessment is it Only a preliminary risk assessment was previously conducted in Ireland (refer to still entirely valid, or only partly valid? PARTIAL Question 5). 7 Where is the organism native? The American bullfrog is native to eastern North America, from the Atlantic coast as far west as Kansas and Oklahoma (McKercher and Gregoire, 2011; Santos-Barrera et al ., - 2009). 8 What is the current global distribution of The species has been introduced in over 40 countries and four continents over the last the organism (excluding Ireland)? (map century (Ficetola et al ., 2007b; Lever, 2003). Including its native range (refer to question optional) 6), the species has a global distribution spanning Argentina; Belgium; Brazil; China; - Colombia; Cuba; Dominican Republic; Ecuador; France; Germany; Greece; Indonesia; Italy; Jamaica; Japan; Malaysia; Netherlands; Peru; Philippines; Puerto Rico; Singapore; Spain; Taiwan, Province of China; Thailand; United Kingdom; Venezuela and also in western North America, including Hawaii (GISD, 2009; Santos-Barrera et al ., 2009) Page 4 of 22 Stage 1 - Organism Information The aim of this section is to gather basic information about the organism. N QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENT Figure 1 Global distribution of American bullfrog (Modified from Santos-Barrera et al ., 2009). 9 What is the current distribution of the It is not currently known to be present in Ireland. N/A organism in Ireland? (map optional) 10 Is the organism known to be invasive It is considered one of the world’s most harmful invasive species; negatively affecting anywhere in the world? native amphibians through competition, predation and spread of disease (Beebee and Griffiths 2005; Govindarajulu et al ., 2006; Kats and Ferrer 2003; Lorvelec and Detaint, YES 2009; Lowe et al ., 2000). Doubledee et al ., (2003) found, for example, a positive correlation between the absence of California red-legged frogs ( Rana draytonii ) and the presence of introduced American bullfrog ( Lithobates catesbeianus ). Page 5 of 22 Stage 2 - Detailed assessment: Section A - Entry This section evaluates the probability of entry of an organism into Ireland. For organisms which are already present, only complete the entry section for currently active pathways of entry and potential future pathways. The entry section need not be completed for pathways which have allowed an organism to enter in the past but are no longer active. N QUESTION RESPONSE CONFIDENCE JUSTIFICATION 1.01 How many active/future pathways are Known historic, active and future introduction pathways to new locations relevant to the potential entry of this internationally include: aquaculture/farming, stocking, ornamental/garden organism (n/a, very few, few, moderate trade, pet/aquarium trade, use in landscape/fauna “improvements”, use number, many or very many)? as biological control agents, smuggling and inadvertent importation (CABI, 2014). It is illegal to import American bullfrogs to Europe since FEW MEDIUM 1997 (law of the European Council 2551/1997) (Teixera et al ., 2001). Therefore, of the pathways listed above, smuggling and inadvertent importation have the most potential to act as active/future pathways for the entry of this species into Ireland. 1.02 List significant pathways through which Smuggling: Although it is illegal to import the American bullfrog into the the organism could enter. Where Europe, this species can be ordered on the Internet and shipped possible give detail about the specific worldwide (Lorvelec and Detaint, 2009). It may be expected that origins and end points of the pathways. smuggling of the species would be undertaken illegally to cater for 1. Smuggling individuals seeking to keep the animal as a captive pet or enhance 2. Inadvertent ornamental ponds. Potential feral populations would be as a result of importation releases of unwanted pets and/or escapes from confinement. Inadvertent importation: the species occurs in close proximity with fish traded internationally, and unintentional releases may be possible via this pathway. Page 6 of 22 Pathway 1 – Smuggling N QUESTION RESPONSE CONFIDENCE JUSTIFICATION 1.03 Is entry along this pathway intentional The species is intentionally smuggled. (e.g. the organism is imported for trade) INTENTIONAL HIGH or accidental (e.g. the organism is a contaminant of imported goods)? 1.04 How likely is it that large numbers of the The number of American bullfrogs potentially entering Ireland via this pathway organism will travel along this pathway is expected to be low and infrequent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphological Abnormalities in Anurans from Central Mexico: a Case Study (Anura: Ranidae, Hylidae)
    heRPetoZoa 27 (3/4): 115 - 121 115 Wien, 30. Jänner 2015 Morphological abnormalities in anurans from central Mexico: a case study (anura: Ranidae, hylidae) Morphologische anomalien bei anuren aus dem mittleren Mexiko: ein Fallbericht (anura: Ranidae, hylidae) oCtavIo MonRoy -v IlChIs & l ouRDes lIZZoulI PaRRa -l óPeZ & t RInIDaD BeltRán -l eón & J oRge a. l ugo & á ngel BalDeRas & M aRtha M. Z aRCo -g onZáleZ KuRZFassung hohe Raten an morphologischen anomalien (Mißbildungen) werden bei amphibien auf die einwirkung von Parasiten, chemischen substanzen, uv-strahlung und Beutegreifern zurückgeführt. Ziele der vorliegenden untersuchung waren die quantitative und qualitative erfassung grobmorphologischer äußerer Mißbildungen an anuren des sierra nanchititla naturreservats (Mexiko) sowie die Identifizierung möglicher ursachen. sechs (6.23 %) der 95 gefangenen Individuen von Lithobates forreri (BoulengeR , 1883) sowie je ein „Beifangexemplar“ von Lithobates zweifeli (h IllIs , F Rost & W eBB , 1984) und Hyla arenicolor CoPe , 1866 zeigten insgesamt acht typen morphologischer Mißbildungen . Die beobachtete Mißbildungsrate lag somit geringfügig über dem mit fünf Prozent angenommenen hintergrundwert einer Population. an Makroparasiten wurden nematoda (Ozwaldocruzi a sp. und Rhabdias savagei ) und trematoda ( Haematoloechus sp. und Gorgoderina tarascae ) an inneren organen sowie Milben der gattung Hannemania auf der Körperoberfläche festgestellt. In den Muskel - gewebsproben, waren die Metalle Blei (Pb) und Kupfer (Cu) nicht nachweis- oder quantifzierbar, während Zink (Zn) in niedrigen (physiologischen) Konzentrationen vorlag. In den Wasserproben wurde Pb nicht nachgewiesen, die Zn and Cu Konzentrationen lagen innerhalb der in Mexiko zulässigen grenzwerte für Fließgewässer. Die autoren schließen als ursache der beobachteten, erhöhten Mißbildungsrate aus: (1) die tätigkeit von Makroparasiten, auf - grund des Fehlens von trematoda der gattung Riberoia , von denen man weiß, das sie Mißbildungen verursachen können und (2) die einwirkung von Pb, Cu and Zn.
    [Show full text]
  • Deicing Salts Influence Ranavirus Outbreaks in Wood Frog (Lithobates Sylvaticus) Tadpoles Sarah Jacobson [email protected]
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Honors Scholar Theses Honors Scholar Program Spring 5-2-2019 Deicing Salts Influence Ranavirus Outbreaks in Wood Frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) Tadpoles Sarah Jacobson [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses Part of the Animal Diseases Commons, Animal Experimentation and Research Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Population Biology Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Virus Diseases Commons Recommended Citation Jacobson, Sarah, "Deicing Salts Influence Ranavirus Outbreaks in Wood Frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) Tadpoles" (2019). Honors Scholar Theses. 618. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses/618 Jacobson 1 Deicing Salts Influence Ranavirus Outbreaks in Wood Frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) Tadpoles Sarah K. Jacobson Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Center for Wildlife and Fisheries Conservation Center, University of Connecticut Tracy A. G. Rittenhouse Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Center for Wildlife and Fisheries Conservation Center, University of Connecticut Jacobson 2 Abstract Ecosystems are increasingly being exposed to anthropogenic stressors that could make animals and thus populations more susceptible to disease. For example, the application of deicing salts to roads is increasing in the northeastern United States. Chronic stress that larval amphibians experience when living in vernal pools with high salinity may alter their susceptibility to ranavirus, a pathogen responsible for mass mortality events worldwide. This project quantifies the effects of road salts and ranavirus exposure on larval wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) growth and survival. Using outdoor mesocsoms, we raised wood frog tadpoles in salt treatments and then exposed them to the FV3 strain of ranavirus, with the hypothesis that individuals raised in salt treatments would have lower survival, and metamorph earlier at larger size when exposed to ranavirus than those from no salt treatments.
    [Show full text]
  • CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG (Lithobates [Rana] Chiricahuensis)
    CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG (Lithobates [Rana] chiricahuensis) Chiricahua Leopard Frog from Sycamore Canyon, Coronado National Forest, Arizona Photograph by Jim Rorabaugh, USFWS CONSIDERATIONS FOR MAKING EFFECTS DETERMINATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REDUCING AND AVOIDING ADVERSE EFFECTS Developed by the Southwest Endangered Species Act Team, an affiliate of the Southwest Strategy Funded by U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program December 2008 (Updated August 31, 2009) ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was developed by members of the Southwest Endangered Species Act (SWESA) Team comprised of representatives from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (BoR), Department of Defense (DoD), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), National Park Service (NPS) and U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). Dr. Terry L. Myers gathered and synthesized much of the information for this document. The SWESA Team would especially like to thank Mr. Steve Sekscienski, U.S. Army Environmental Center, DoD, for obtaining the funds needed for this project, and Dr. Patricia Zenone, USFWS, New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office, for serving as the Contracting Officer’s Representative for this grant. Overall guidance, review, and editing of the document was provided by the CMED Subgroup of the SWESA Team, consisting of: Art Coykendall (BoR), John Nystedt (USFWS), Patricia Zenone (USFWS), Robert L. Palmer (DoD, U.S. Navy), Vicki Herren (BLM), Wade Eakle (USACE), and Ronnie Maes (USFS). The cooperation of many individuals facilitated this effort, including: USFWS: Jim Rorabaugh, Jennifer Graves, Debra Bills, Shaula Hedwall, Melissa Kreutzian, Marilyn Myers, Michelle Christman, Joel Lusk, Harold Namminga; USFS: Mike Rotonda, Susan Lee, Bryce Rickel, Linda WhiteTrifaro; USACE: Ron Fowler, Robert Dummer; BLM: Ted Cordery, Marikay Ramsey; BoR: Robert Clarkson; DoD, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Some Amphibians from Central Western Mexico: Jalisco
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 690-696, 2013 690 Rosas-Espinoza et al.- AmphibiansDOI: from 10.7550/rmb.31945 western Mexico Research note Distribution of some amphibians from central western Mexico: Jalisco Distribución de algunos anfibios del centro occidente de México: Jalisco Verónica Carolina Rosas-Espinoza1, Jesús Mauricio Rodríguez-Canseco1 , Ana Luisa Santiago-Pérez1, Alberto Ayón-Escobedo1 and Matías Domínguez-Laso2 1Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Km 15.5 carretera Guadalajara- Nogales, 45110 Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico. 2UMA Coatzin, Prol. Piñón Núm. 39, Barrio de la Cruz. 76800 San Juan del Río, Querétaro, México. [email protected] Abstract. The amphibian fauna from central western Mexico has not been studied thoroughly. Particularly for the state of Jalisco, until 1994 the majority of herpetofauna checklists were made on seasonally tropical dry forest at the Pacific coast. Recently, the herpetofauna checklists for some natural protected areas and surroundings of central and northeastern localities of Jalisco were reported. Sierra de Quila is a natural protected area located in central Jalisco, and these results are part of the first formal study for this area. During 15 months, from January 2009 to September 2010, we surveyed amphibians on an altitudinal gradient including all vegetation types: cloud forest, pine-oak forest, oak forest, riparian forest and tropical deciduous forest. We registered 11 noteworthy range extensions for amphibians within Jalisco and into the Sierra de Quila. Key words: range extension, protected area, Sierra de Quila. Resumen. Los anfibios de la parte centro-occidente de México han sido poco estudiados. Particularmente para el estado de Jalisco y hasta 1994, la mayoría de los inventarios de herpetoafuna fueron realizados en el bosque tropical caducifolio en la costa del Pacífico.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Leopard Frogs Range from the Northern United States and Canada to the More Northern Parts of the Southwestern United States
    COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Leopard Frogs ASSESSING HABITAT QUALITY FOR PRIORITY WILDLIFE SPECIES IN COLORADO WETLANDS Species Distribution Range Northern leopard frogs range from the northern United States and Canada to the more northern parts of the southwestern United States. With the exception of a few counties, they occur throughout Colorado. Plains leopard frogs have a much smaller distribution than northern leopard frogs, occurring through the Great Plains into southeastern Arizona and eastern Colorado. NORTHERN LEOPARD FROG © KEITH PENNER / PLAINS LEOPARD FROG © RENEE RONDEAU, CNHP RONDEAU, FROGRENEE © LEOPARD PLAINS / PENNER FROGKEITH © LEOPARD NORTHERN Two species of leopard frogs occur in Colorado. Northern leopard frogs (Lithobates pipiens; primary photo, brighter green) are more widespread than plains leopard frogs (L. blairi; inset). eral, plains leopard frogs breed in more Species Description ephemeral ponds, while northern leopard Identification frogs use semi-permanent ponds. Two leopard frogs are included in this Diet guild: northern leopard frog (Lithobates Adult leopard frogs eat primarily insects pipiens) and plains leopard frog (L. blairi). and other invertebrates, including They are roughly the same size (3–4 inches crustaceans, mollusks, and worms, as as adults). Northern leopard frogs can be well as small vertebrates, such as other green or brown and plains leopard frogs amphibians and snakes. Leopard frog are typically brown. Both species have two tadpoles are herbivorous, eating mostly light dorsolateral ridges along the back; in free-floating algae, but also consuming plains leopard frog there is a break in this some animal material. ridge near the rear legs. Conservation Status Preferred Habitats Northern leopard frog populations have Due to their complicated life history traits, declined throughout their range; they are leopard frogs occupy many habitats during listed in all western states and Canada different seasons and stages of develop- as sensitive, threatened, or endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Leopard Frog
    Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Lithobates pipiens (Northern Leopard Frog) Priority 2 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Amphibia (Amphibians) Order: Anura (Frogs And Toads) Family: Ranidae (True Frogs) General comments: There are >100 occurrences statewide, but concerns remain about declines in southern Maine and range-wide. 6 of 6 reviewers recommend SC listing. Species Conservation Range Maps for Northern Leopard Frog: Town Map: Lithobates pipiens_Towns.pdf Subwatershed Map: Lithobates pipiens_HUC12.pdf SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: NA State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: Lithobates pipiens is listed as a species of Special Concern in Maine. Recent Significant Declines: NA Regional Endemic: NA High Regional Conservation Priority: Northeast Endangered Species and Wildlife Diversity Technical Committee: Risk: Yes, Data: Yes, Area: No, Spec: Yes, Warrant Listing: No, Total Categories with "Yes": 3 Northeast Partners In Amphibian and Reptile Conservation (NEPARC): Regional Responsibility:< 50 % US Distribution, Concern: >= 50 % of States Listed in WAP High Climate Change Vulnerability: NA Understudied rare taxa: NA Historical: NA Culturally Significant: NA Habitats Assigned to Northern Leopard Frog: Formation Name Agricultural Macrogroup Name Agricultural Habitat System Name: Pasture-Hay Formation Name Boreal Wetland Forest Macrogroup Name Boreal Forested Peatland Habitat System Name: Boreal-Laurentian Conifer Acidic Swamp Formation
    [Show full text]
  • American Bullfrogs (Lithobates Catesbeianus) Resist Infection by Multiple Isolates of Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis, Including One Implicated in Wild Mass Mortality
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title American Bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) Resist Infection by Multiple Isolates of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, Including One Implicated in Wild Mass Mortality. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/70k460fz Journal EcoHealth, 12(3) ISSN 1612-9202 Authors Eskew, Evan A Worth, S Joy Foley, Janet E et al. Publication Date 2015-09-01 DOI 10.1007/s10393-015-1035-2 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California EcoHealth 12, 513–518, 2015 DOI: 10.1007/s10393-015-1035-2 Ó 2015 International Association for Ecology and Health Short Communication American Bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) Resist Infection by Multiple Isolates of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, Including One Implicated in Wild Mass Mortality Evan A. Eskew ,1 S. Joy Worth,2 Janet E. Foley,2 and Brian D. Todd3 1Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616 2Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616 3Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616 Abstract: The emerging amphibian disease chytridiomycosis varies in severity depending on host species. Within species, disease susceptibility can also be influenced by pathogen variation and environmental factors. Here, we report on experimental exposures of American bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) to three different isolates of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), including one implicated in causing mass mortality of wild American bullfrogs. Exposed frogs showed low infection prevalence, relatively low infection load, and lack of clinical disease. Our results suggest that environmental cofactors are likely important contributors to Bd- associated American bullfrog mortality and that this species both resists and tolerates Bd infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Leopard Frog
    Species Status Assessment Class: Amphibia Family: Ranidae Scientific Name: Lithobates sphenocephalus utricularius Common Name: Southern leopard frog Species synopsis: NOTE: More than a century of taxonomic confusion regarding the leopard frogs of the East Coast was resolved in 2012 with the publication of a genetic analysis (Newman et al. 2012) confirming that a third, cryptic species of leopard frog (Rana [= Lithobates] sp. nov.) occurs in southern New York, northern New Jersey, and western Connecticut. The molecular evidence strongly supported the distinction of this new species from the previously known northern (R. pipiens [= L. pipiens]) and southern (R. sphenocephala [=L. sphenocephalus]) leopard frogs. The new species’ formal description, which presents differences in vocalizations, morphology, and habitat affiliation (Feinberg et al. in preparation), is nearing submission for publication. This manuscript also presents bioacoustic evidence of the frog’s occurrence in southern New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, and as far south as the Virginia/North Carolina border, thereby raising uncertainty about which species of leopard frog occur(s) presently and historically throughout the region. Some evidence suggests that Long Island might at one time have had two species: the southern leopard frog in the pine barrens and the undescribed species in coastal wetlands and the Hudson Valley. For simplicity’s sake, in this assessment we retain the name “southern leopard frog” even though much of the information available may refer to the undescribed species or a combination of species. The southern leopard frog occurs in the eastern United States and reaches the northern extent of its range in the lower Hudson Valley of New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Response of Adult and Larval Wood Frogs (Lithobates Sylvaticus) to a Common Road De-Icer, Nacl Dylan Jones Montclair State University
    Montclair State University Montclair State University Digital Commons Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects 5-2018 Behavioral Response of Adult and Larval Wood Frogs (Lithobates sylvaticus) to a Common Road De-Icer, NaCl Dylan Jones Montclair State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Dylan, "Behavioral Response of Adult and Larval Wood Frogs (Lithobates sylvaticus) to a Common Road De-Icer, NaCl" (2018). Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects. 132. https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/etd/132 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Montclair State University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects by an authorized administrator of Montclair State University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Amphibians are highly vulnerable to aquatic pollutants. Due to the permeability of their skin and their aquatic larval stages, pollutants are easily absorbed into the body, which can have adverse effects on performance, survival, and fitness. This has prompted research on how environmental pollutants affect amphibian populations, especially road deicers such as sodium chloride (NaCl). Elevated NaCl can have a negative physiological impact on both adult and larval stages of amphibians, leading to reduced breeding success, morphological abnormalities, and even mortality. However, less is known about the behavioral responses of adults and especially larval amphibians to increased environmental salinity. Earlier studies suggested that adult wood frogs did not show any behavioral responses to varying salinity with short-term (10 min) exposure, while larvae had not been assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information Tables
    Mapping the Global Emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, the Amphibian Chytrid Fungus Deanna H. Olson, David M. Aanensen, Kathryn L. Ronnenberg, Christopher I. Powell, Susan F. Walker, Jon Bielby, Trenton W. J. Garner, George Weaver, the Bd Mapping Group, and Matthew C. Fisher Supplemental Information Taxonomic Notes Genera were assigned to families for summarization (Table 1 in main text) and analysis (Table 2 in main text) based on the most recent available comprehensive taxonomic references (Frost et al. 2006, Frost 2008, Frost 2009, Frost 2011). We chose recent family designations to explore patterns of Bd susceptibility and occurrence because these classifications were based on both genetic and morphological data, and hence may more likely yield meaningful inference. Some North American species were assigned to genus according to Crother (2008), and dendrobatid frogs were assigned to family and genus based on Grant et al. (2006). Eleutherodactylid frogs were assigned to family and genus based on Hedges et al. (2008); centrolenid frogs based on Cisneros-Heredia et al. (2007). For the eleutherodactylid frogs of Central and South America and the Caribbean, older sources count them among the Leptodactylidae, whereas Frost et al. (2006) put them in the family Brachycephalidae. More recent work (Heinicke et al. 2007) suggests that most of the genera that were once “Eleutherodactylus” (including those species currently assigned to the genera Eleutherodactylus, Craugastor, Euhyas, Phrynopus, and Pristimantis and assorted others), may belong in a separate, or even several different new families. Subsequent work (Hedges et al. 2008) has divided them among three families, the Craugastoridae, the Eleutherodactylidae, and the Strabomantidae, which were used in our classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 112:9-16
    This authors' personal copy may not be publicly or systematically copied or distributed, or posted on the Open Web, except with written permission of the copyright holder(s). It may be distributed to interested individuals on request. Vol. 112: 9–16, 2014 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published November 13 doi: 10.3354/dao02792 Dis Aquat Org High susceptibility of the endangered dusky gopher frog to ranavirus William B. Sutton1,2,*, Matthew J. Gray1, Rebecca H. Hardman1, Rebecca P. Wilkes3, Andrew J. Kouba4, Debra L. Miller1,3 1Center for Wildlife Health, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA 2Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA 3Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee Center of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA 4Memphis Zoo, Conservation and Research Department, Memphis, TN 38112, USA ABSTRACT: Amphibians are one of the most imperiled vertebrate groups, with pathogens playing a role in the decline of some species. Rare species are particularly vulnerable to extinction be - cause populations are often isolated and exist at low abundance. The potential impact of patho- gens on rare amphibian species has seldom been investigated. The dusky gopher frog Lithobates sevosus is one of the most endangered amphibian species in North America, with 100−200 indi- viduals remaining in the wild. Our goal was to determine whether adult L. sevosus were suscep- tible to ranavirus, a pathogen responsible for amphibian die-offs worldwide. We tested the rela- tive susceptibility of adult L. sevosus to ranavirus (103 plaque-forming units) isolated from a morbid bullfrog via 3 routes of exposure: intra-coelomic (IC) injection, oral (OR) inoculation, and water bath (WB) exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • American Bullfrog (Lithobates Catesbeianus)
    American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) Description The scientific name for the American Bullfrog is lithobates catesbeianus. Lithobates is the Greek genus name, derived from litho- (stone) and bates (one that treads), meaning one that treads on rock, or rock climber. Catesbeianus is the Latin species name in honor of Mark Catesby, an 18th century naturalist who first published an account of the flora and fauna of North America. The frog is also known as Rana catesbeiana. The American Bullfrog is an amphibian (cold-blooded vertebrate) and a true frog. Bullfrogs are long-legged and distinguished by extensively webbed hind feet, horizontal pupils, and a bony breastbone. (Figure 1). True frogs occur on every continent except Antarctica and contain more than 600 species. Bullfrogs hatch from eggs into a tadpole, a gill-breathing larval stage, Figure 1: American Bullfrog (Figure 2) followed by a lung-breathing adult stage (Figure 1). The Jen Goellnltz, “A cousin of Kermit” Bullfrog tadpole also breathes through its skin. As they become 08/01/2008 adults, Bullfrogs lose their gills and grow lungs, but still breathe through Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- their skin both on land and in water. On the refuge, treefrogs, toads, nc-nd/4.0/ salamanders and rough-skinned newts are the Bullfrog’s closest relatives. The American Bullfrog is an invasive species to Oregon, meaning that it is not native to Oregon. An invasive species often overwhelms the environment it spreads to, frequently causing great harm to the environment and native species. Bullfrogs are the largest frog in North American and can reach a body length of 6 to 8 inches.
    [Show full text]