DOCSLIB.ORG

KO KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Knowl. Org. 35(2008)No.2/No.3 KO KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION Official Quarterly Journal of the International Society for Knowledge Organization ISSN 0943 – 7444 International Journal devoted to Concept Theory, Classification, Indexing and Knowledge Representation Contents Preface to Special Issue María J. López-Huertas. Some Current Research Questions “What is Knowledge Organization” in the Field of Knowledge Organization ........................113 Guest Editors: Ia C. McIlwaine and Joan S. Mitchell............................... 79 Claudio Gnoli. Ten Long-Term Research Questions Feature in Knowledge Organization ............................................137 Interview with Ingetraut Dahlberg Rebecca Green. December 2007.................................................................. 82 Relationships in Knowledge Organization.....................150 Articles Marcia Lei Zeng. Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS)......................160 Birger Hjørland. What is Knowledge Organization (KO)?........................ 86 Joseph T. Tennis. Epistemology, Theory, and Methodology in Knowledge Organization: Toward a Classification, Metatheory, and Research Framework................................................ 102 Knowl. Org. 35(2008)No.2/No.3 KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION KO Official Quarterly Journal of the International Society for Knowledge Organization ISSN 0943 – 7444 International Journal devoted to Concept Theory, Classification, Indexing and Knowledge Representation KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION Dr. Jens-Erik MAI, Faculty of Information Studies, University of Toronto, 140 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G6, This journal is the organ of the INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY Canada. Email: [email protected] FOR KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION (General Secretariat: H. Peter OHLY, Social Science Information Center, Lennestr. 30, Ms. Joan S. MITCHELL, Editor in Chief, Dewey Decimal Classi- D-53113 Bonn, Germany. fication, OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-3395 USA. Editors Email: [email protected] Dr. Richard P. SMIRAGLIA (Editor-in-Chief), Palmer School of Dr. Widad MUSTAFA el HADI, URF IDIST, Université Charles Library and Information Science, Long Island University, 720 de Gaulle Lille 3, BP 149, 59653 Villeneuve D’Ascq, France Northern Blvd., Brookville NY 11548 USA. H. Peter OHLY, IZ Sozialwissenschaften, Lennestr. 30, 53113 Email: [email protected] Bonn Germany. Email: [email protected] Dr. Clément ARSENAULT (Book Review Editor), École de bi- Dr. Hope A. OLSON, School of Information Studies, 522 Bolton bliothéconomie et des sciences de l’information, Université de Hall, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201 Montréal, C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-ville, Montréal (QC) H3C 3J7, USA. Email: [email protected] Canada. Email: [email protected] Ms. Annelise Mark PEJTERSEN, Systems Analysis Dept., Risoe Dr. Ia MCILWAINE (Literature Editor), Research Fellow. School National Laboratory, P.O. Box 49, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark of Library, Archive & Information Studies, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT U.K. Email: Dr. M. P. SATIJA, Guru Nanak Dev University, School of Library [email protected] and Information Science, Amritsar-143 005, India Dr. Nancy WILLIAMSON (Classification Research News Edi- Dr. Otto SECHSER, In der Ey 37, CH-8047 Zürich, Switzerland tor), Faculty of Information Studies, University of Toronto, 140 Dr. Winfried SCHMITZ-ESSER, Salvatorgasse 23, 6060 Hall, Ti- St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G6 Canada. rol, Austria. Email: [email protected] Dr. Dagobert SOERGEL, College of Information Studies, Horn- Hanne ALBRECHTSEN, Institute of Knowledge Sharing, Bu- bake Bldg. (So. Wing), Room 4105, University of Maryland, Col- reauet, Slotsgade 2, 2nd floor DK-2200 Copenhagen N Denmark. lege Park, MD 20742. Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Dr. Eduard R. SUKIASYAN, Vozdvizhenka 3, RU-101000, Mos- Gabriel MCKEE (Editorial Assistant), Palmer School of Library cow, Russia. and Information Science, Long Island University. Dr. Joseph T. TENNIS, The Information School of the University Consulting Editors of Washington, Box 352840, Mary Gates Hall Ste 370, Seattle WA 98195-2840 USA. E-mail: [email protected]. Prof. Clare BEGHTOL, Faculty of Information Studies, Univer- sity of Toronto, 140 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S Dr. Martin van der WALT, Department of Information Science, 3G6, Canada. Email: [email protected] University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa. Email: [email protected] Dr. Gerhard BUDIN, Dept. of Philosophy of Science, University of Vienna, Sensengasse 8, A-1090 Wien, Austria. Prof. Dr. Harald ZIMMERMANN, Softex, Schmollerstrasse 31, Email: [email protected] D-66111 Saarbrücken, Germany Prof. Jesús GASCÓN GARCÍA, Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, Universitat de Barcelona, C. Melcior de Palau, 140, 08014 Barcelona, Spain. Email: [email protected] Claudio GNOLI, University of Pavia, Mathematics Department Library, via Ferrata 1, I-27100 Pavia, Italy. Email: [email protected] Dr. Rebecca GREEN, Assistant Editor, Dewey Decimal Classifi- cation, Dewey Editorial Office, Library of Congress, Decimal Classification Division , 101 Independence Ave., S.E., Washington, DC 20540-4330, USA. Email: [email protected] Dr. Birger HJØRLAND, Royal School of Library and Informa- tion Science, Copenhagen Denmark. Email: [email protected] Founded under the title International Classification in 1974 by Dr. Dr. Barbara H. KWASNIK, Professor, School of Information Ingetraut Dahlberg, the founding president of ISKO. Dr. Dahl- Studies, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA, (315) 443- berg served as the journal's editor from 1974 to 1997, and as its 4547 voice, (315) 443-4506 fax. Email: [email protected] publisher (Indeks Verlag of Frankfurt) from 1981 to 1997. Knowl. Org. 35(2008)No.2/No.3 79 I. C. McIlwaine and J. S. Mitchell. Preface to Special Issue. “What is Knowledge Organization” Preface to Special Issue “What is Knowledge Organization” Guest Editors: Ia C. McIlwaine* and Joan S. Mitchell** *University College London, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT <[email protected]]>; **OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., 6565 Kilgour Place, Dublin, OH 43017-3395 <[email protected]> / <[email protected]> Ia McIlwaine is Professor Emeritus of Library & Information Studies in the University of London. She was formerly Director of the School of Library, Archive & Information Studies at University Col- lege London and Editor in Chief of the UDC. She was Chair of the IFLA Professional Committee, 2003-2005 and is Past President of ISKO. Joan S. Mitchell is editor in chief of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system at OCLC Onli- ne Computer Library Center, Inc. Prior to joining OCLC in 1993, Mitchell was director of educa- tional technology at Carnegie Mellon University and an adjunct professor in the School of Informa- tion Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh. She has also held various positions in academic and spe- cial libraries. Mitchell has written and spoken extensively in the area of knowledge organization, and has a special interest in localization and interoperability in classification systems. In 2005, she was awarded the Melvil Dewey Medal by the American Library Association. Mitchell serves on the edito- rial board of Knowledge Organization, and is a member of the Scientific Advisory Council of ISKO. She received her bachelor's degree in economics from Newton College of the Sacred Heart and her master of library science degree from the University of California, Berkeley. McIlwaine, Ia C. and Mitchell, Joan S. Preface to Special Issue. “What is Knowledge Organization”. Knowledge Organization, 35(3/2), 79-81. The aim of this special issue of Knowledge Organiza- tion science (LIS), interest in knowledge organization tion is to explore the definition of the interdiscipli- is not limited to the LIS field. Indeed, contributors to nary field of “knowledge organization” through his- Knowledge Organization (the society’s journal) and torical and contemporary perspectives. The goal is to to ISKO conferences represent areas of interdiscipli- provide a shared framework of terminology, theories, nary research and application well beyond LIS itself. methodologies, and approaches to stimulate research. The excitement engendered by wide interest from The International Society for Knowledge Organi- many disciplines in the field of knowledge organiza- zation (ISKO) is the premier international scholarly tion has also caused some confusion about the mean- society devoted to the theory and practice of knowl- ing of “knowledge organization” and its relationship edge organization. At the Ninth International ISKO to other fields such as “knowledge management.” Conference in Vienna in July 2006, it became clear We have invited a group of authors drawn widely during informal conversations and discussions within from the ISKO community and who among them the Scientific Advisory Council that there was a need span a half century of research in the field to address to present a shared definition of the field of knowl- such questions as: edge organization. While a majority of ISKO mem- bers are drawn from the field of library and informa- – What is knowledge organization? 80 Knowl. Org. 35(2008)No.2/No.3 I. C. McIlwaine and J. S. Mitchell. Preface to Special Issue. “What is Knowledge Organization” – What are the meanings of “document,” “informa- He also explores the definitions
Recommended publications
  • Knowledge Organization: a New Science?*

    Knowledge Organization: a New Science?*

    Knowl. Org. 33(2006)No.1 11 Ingetraut Dahlberg. Knowledge Organization: A New Science? Knowledge Organization: A New Science?* Ingetraut Dahlberg Am Hirtenberg 13, 64732 Bad König, Germany, E-mail: [email protected] Ingetraut Dahlberg started work on thesauri and classification in the early sixties. She developed her concept theory in 1972 together with her work on the establishment of a universal classification sys- tem of knowledge fields, the Information Coding Classification, published in 1982. In 1974 she founded the journal International Classification, now known as Knowledge Organization, and was its editor for 23 years. She founded also the German Society for Classification in 1977 and chaired it until 1986. In 1989 the International Society for Knowledge Organization was founded with her as presi- dent until 1996. In 1980 she founded the INDEKS Verlag, which was taken over by Ergon Verlag in 1997. She organized many conferences, taught at universities and polytechnics, wrote a few books and more than 250 articles and is still interested in ISKOs activities as a member of its Scientific Advisory Council. * This feature is a translated and slightly revised version of a paper presented in German at the Conference on Conceptual Knowledge Processing, Darmstadt, 23.-26 February 2, 1994. Published in Wille, R., Zickwolf, M. eds. 1994. Begriffliche Wis- sensverarbeitung. Grundfragen und Aufgaben. Mannheim: BI Wissenschaftverlag. pp. 225-38. Dahlberg, Ingetraut. Knowledge Organization: A New Science? Knowledge Organization, 33(1). 11-19. 32 refs. ABSTRACT: In ISKO’s name, the term “Knowledge Organization” (KO) denotes already the object and the activity area sig- nificant for the existence of any science.
  • Implications of Big Data for Knowledge Organization. Fidelia Ibekwe-Sanjuan, Bowker Geoffrey

    Implications of Big Data for Knowledge Organization. Fidelia Ibekwe-Sanjuan, Bowker Geoffrey

    Implications of big data for knowledge organization. Fidelia Ibekwe-Sanjuan, Bowker Geoffrey To cite this version: Fidelia Ibekwe-Sanjuan, Bowker Geoffrey. Implications of big data for knowledge organization.. Knowledge Organization, Ergon Verlag, 2017, Special issue on New trends for Knowledge Organi- zation, Renato Rocha Souza (guest editor), 44 (3), pp.187-198. hal-01489030 HAL Id: hal-01489030 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01489030 Submitted on 23 Apr 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License F. Ibekwe-SanJuan and G. C. Bowker (2017). Implications of Big Data for Knowledge Organization, Knowledge Organization 44(3), pp. 187-198 Implications of big data for knowledge organization Fidelia Ibekwe-SanJuan Geoffrey C. Bowker Aix Marseille Univ, IRSIC, Marseille, France University of California, Irvine, USA. [email protected] [email protected] Fidelia Ibekwe-SanJuan is Professor at the School of Journalism and Communication, University of Aix-Marseille in France. Her research interests span both empirical and theoretical issues. She has developed methodologies and tools for text mining and information retrieval. She is interested in the epistemology of science, in inter-disciplinarity issues and in the history of information and library science.
  • Principles of Knowledge Organization: Analysis and Structures in the Networked Environment

    Principles of Knowledge Organization: Analysis and Structures in the Networked Environment

    Principles of knowledge organization: analysis and structures in the networked environment 0. Abstract 1. Context of discussion 2. Definition of principles Knowledge organization in the networked environment is guided by standards. Standards Principles are laws, assumptions standards, rules, in knowledge organization are built on principles. For example, NISO Z39.19-1993 Guide judgments, policy, modes of action, as essential or • Knowledge Organization in the networked environment is guided by standards to the Construction of Monolingual Thesauri (now undergoing revision) and NISO Z39.85- basic qualities. They can also be considered goals • Standards in knowledge organization are built on principles 2001 Dublin Core Metadata Element Set are tw o standards used in ma ny implementations. or values in some knowledge organization theories. Both of these standards were crafted with knowledge organization principles in mind. (Adapting the definition from the American Heritage Therefore it is standards work guided by knowledge organization principles which can Existing standards built on principles: Dictionary). affect design of information services and technologies. This poster outlines five threads of • NISO Z39.19-1993 Guide to the Construction of Monolingual Thesauri thought that inform knowledge organization principles in the networked environment. An • NISO Z39.85-2001 Dublin Core Metadata Element Set understanding of each of these five threads informs system evaluation. The evaluation of knowledge organization systems should be tightly
  • Biases in Knowledge Representation: an Analysis of the Feminine Domain in Brazilian Indexing Languages

    Biases in Knowledge Representation: an Analysis of the Feminine Domain in Brazilian Indexing Languages

    Suellen Oliveira Milani and José Augusto Chaves Guimarães. 2011. Biases in knowledge representation: an analysis of the feminine domain in Brazilian indexing languages. In Smiraglia, Richard P., ed. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, Vol. 3. Toronto, Canada, pp. 94-104. Suellen Oliveira Milani ([email protected]) and José Augusto Chaves Guimarães ([email protected]) Sao Paulo State University, Marília, SP, Brazil Biases in Knowledge Representation: an Analysis of the Feminine Domain in Brazilian Indexing Languages† Abstract: The process of knowledge representation, as well as its tools and resulting products are not neutral but permeated by moral values. This scenario gives rise to problems of biases in representation, such as gender issues, dichotomy categorizations and lack of cultural warrant and hospitality. References on women’s issues are still scarce in the literature, which makes it necessary to analyze to what extent the terms related to these particular issues are inserted in the tools in a biased way. This study aimed to verify the presence of the terms female, femininity, feminism, feminist, maternal, motherly, woman/women within the following Brazilian indexing languages: Subject Terminology of the National Library (STNL), University of Sao Paulo Subject Headings (USPSH), Brazilian Senate Subject Headings (BSSH) and Law Decimal Classification (LDC). Each term identified in the first three alphabetical languages generated a registration card containing both its descriptors and non-descriptors, as well as scope notes, USE/UF, RT, and BT/NT relationships. As for the analysis of LDC, the registration card was filled out by following the categories proposed by Olson (1998).
  • Dr. Ingetraut Dahlberg †

    Dr. Ingetraut Dahlberg †

    Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis 2018; 69(1): 69–72 Personalie Dr. Ingetraut Dahlberg † https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2018-0003 Ingetraut wechselte zeitweise zum Studium der Biologie. Reinhard sollte später für sein Konzept zur Technik der Solar-Wasserstoff-Umwandlung berühmt werden. Die Eheleute gingen aber wieder auseinander, nicht zuletzt weil die Eltern gegen diese Heirat waren, und Ingetraut zog nach Frankfurt zurück. 1959 fand Ingetraut eine Stelle am Gmelin-Institut (Di- rektor: Erich Pietsch) für Anorganische Chemie in Frank- furt, wo sie Bibliographien für die Atomkernenergie-Doku- mentation (AED) zusammenstellte und damit ihre Karriere in der wissenschaftlichen Literaturdokumentation und In- Dr. Ingetraut Dahlberg, 23. Mai 2014 in Krakau auf der 13. interna- formationswissenschaft begann. 1961 wechselte sie zum tionalen ISKO Konferenz (Foto: Renate Ohly) Rationalisierungs-Kuratorium der Deutschen Wirtschaft (RKW). In den Jahren 1962/63 nahm sie an einer Ausbil- Im Alter von 90 Jahren, acht Monate nach ihrem Geburts- dung zur wissenschaftlichen Dokumentarin teil. Danach tag, verstarb Ingetraut Dahlberg am 24. Oktober 2017 in arbeitete sie bei der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumen- Bad König. Für die ISKO war sie die zentrale Gründerin und tation (DGD) an der Erfassung der bibliothekarischen Be- wegweisende Persönlichkeit. Anlässlich ihres 80. Geburts- stände sowie der Dokumentation der Literatur zum Thema tages stellte ich fest: alleine in Google wurde sie auf über Dokumentation, wozu ein Thesaurus entwickelt wurde. 900 Internetseiten nachgewiesen, zehn Jahre später, Ende 1964/65 ging sie für ein Jahr zum Groth Institute for Cry- Oktober 2017, sind es bei Google sogar 13.300 Treffer, in stallographic Data Documentation an der Florida Atlantic der Wikipedia wird auf 300 Veröffentlichungen verwiesen University in Boca Raton, später an deren Universitäts- und schon 2014 listet eine Personen-Dokumentation der bibliothek.
  • Knowledge Organization: an Epistemological Perspective

    Knowledge Organization: an Epistemological Perspective

    Knowl. Org. 31(2004)No.1 49 Ch. Zins: Knowledge Organization: An Epistemological Perspective Knowledge Organization: An Epistemological Perspective Chaim Zins Department of Information ScienceHuman Services, Bar-Ilan University of Haifa Email: [email protected]. Dr. Chaim Zins is an information scientist, at the Department of Information Science, Bar-Ilan Uni- versity. He is a former member at the Department of Human Services, University of Haifa. Dr. Zins' current research is focused on knowledge organization, foundations of information science, knowl- edge management, information and referral services, and information retrieval. Zins, Chaim. (2004). Knowledge Organization: An Epistemological Perspective. Knowledge Or- ganization, 31(1). 49-54. 11 refs. ABSTRACT: This philosophical essay explores the epistemological foundations of knowledge organization and discusses im- plications for classification research. The study defines the concept of “knowledge,” distinguishes between subjective knowl- edge (i.e., knowledge as a thought in the individual’s mind) and objective knowledge (i.e., knowledge as an independent ob- ject), establishes the necessity of knowledge organization in the construction of knowledge and its key role in the creation, learning, and dissemination of knowledge, and concludes with implications for the development of classification schemes and knowledge maps. Overview second stage, I will discuss the relationship between subjective knowledge and objective knowledge. (No- Scholars and practitioners in the field of knowledge te that “subjective knowledge” is equivalent here to organization rarely stop to reflect and ponder upon the knowledge of the subject or the individual kno- the philosophical foundations of their field of exper- wer, and “objective knowledge” is equivalent here to tise.
  • UDC Seminar 2009: an Overview

    UDC Seminar 2009: an Overview

    UDC Seminar 2009: an overview Item Type Article Authors Slavic, Aida; Cordeiro, Maria Inês Citation Slavic, A. UDC Seminar 2009: an overview. Extensions and corrections to the UDC, 31 (2009), pp. 165-167. Publisher UDC Consortium Journal Extensions & Corrections to the UDC Download date 01/10/2021 07:39:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/118445 PROCEEDINGS UDC Seminar 2009 | Classification at a Crossroads: Multiple Directions to Usability UDC Seminar 2009: an overview Aida Slavic & Maria Inês Cordeiro Conference Programme Chairs UDC Consortium UDC Seminars’ background Following the first UDC Seminar that took place on 4-5 June 2007, the proceedings of which are published as an annex to Extensions and Corrections to the UDC 29 (2007), it is with great pleasure that we now introduce the proceedings of the second in the series of what are now biennial UDC conferences. These conferences are organized by the UDC Consortium and their titles honour the first two international UDC Seminars that took place in 1968 and 1970, in Copenhagen and Frankfurt respectively. We often refer to the first two as the ‘famous UDC seminars’ as they were the first to address the issues of classification use online, ahead of their time and pushing at the boundaries of research. The Copenhagen and Frankfurt seminars left their mark on classification research for decades. In many ways they represent a milestone in the evolution of library classification and they brought awareness of the role bibliographic classifications could play in the world of computers
  • The Indexer Vol 20 No 1 April 1996

    The Indexer Vol 20 No 1 April 1996

    Indexing: A Current Awareness Bibliography Jean Wheeler Part 6 AUTOMATIC INDEXING 957 Fillmore, Laura. Beyond the back of Information Science 46 no. 7 (Aug. 1995): (see also 1006, 1007, 1052, 1056, 1067) the book: indexing in a shrinking world. 537-550. Bibliography. Tables. Key Words 3 no. 3 (Jul.-Aug. 1995): 16-20. 950 Alexander, Michael. Automatic 964 Moys, Elizabeth M. Computer- Discusses the World Wide Web, and indexing of document images using assisted indexing of looseleaf supplements. provides suggestions for experienced Excalibur EFS. Library Technology News Indexer 19 no. 4 (Oct. 1995): 283-286. Illus. indexers regarding work in the Internet no. 16 (Feb. 1995): 4-8. industry. 965 Rajashekar, T.B.; Croft, W. Bruce. The application of Excalibur EFS software Combining automatic and manual index at the British Library. 958 Girardi, M.R.; Ibrahim, B. representations in probabilistic retrieval. Automatic indexing of software artifacts. 951 Buckley, Chris, et al. Automatic Journal of the American Society for In: Proceedings Third International routing and retrieval using SMART: Information Science 46 no. 4 (May 1995): Conference on Software Reuse: Advances in TREC-2. Information Processing and 272-283. Bibliography. Figures. Tables. Management 31 no. 3 (May-June 1995): Software Reusability, November 1-4, 1994, 315-326. Bibliography. Tables. Rio de Janeiro. Brasil, edited by William B. 966 Suzuki, H. Automatic addition of Text Retrieval Conference (TREC). Frakes, 24-32. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE descriptors of JICST thesaurus to the Computer Society Press, 1994. ICHUSHI subfile of JMEDICINE file. 952 Caid, William R., et al. Learned Bibliography. Figures. Tables. Joho Kami 37 no.
  • Yearbook of International Organizations 2020

    Yearbook of International Organizations 2020

    YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS 2020 - 202 1 Copyright 2020 Union of International Associations i Publication history 1905 – 1907 1983 (20th ed.) – 2010 (47th ed.) Institut International de la Paix, Monaco Edited by the Union of International Associations (Brussels). – Annuaire de la Vie internationale: 1905–1906–1907 (1ère Published, with four supplementary volumes, by K.G. Saur série). Verlag (Munich) – Yearbook of International Organizations 1908 – 1911 – Volume 1: Organization descriptions, from 1983 (20th ed.) Union of International Associations / Central Office of to 1998 (35th ed.) and in 2 parts (1A and 1B) since 1999 International Associations (36th ed.) – Annuaire de la Vie internationale (with the collaboration of the – Volume 2: Geographic Volume: International Organization Institut International de Bibliographie and the Institut Participation; Country directory of secretariats and International de la Paix) 1908–1909 (2ème série) membership, since 1983 (1st ed.) – Annuaire de la Vie internationale (with the support of the – Volume 3: Subject volume: Global Action Networks; Carnegie Endowment for International Peace) 1910–1911 Classified directory by subject and region, since 1983 (1st (2ème série) ed.) – Volume 4: Bibliographic volume: International 1921 – 1939 Organization Bibliography and Resources, since 1996 (1st Continuation by the League of Nations (Geneva) of the initiative ed.) of the Union of International Associations – Volume 5: Statistics, Visualizations and Patterns, since – Répertoire des Organisations internationales: 1925, 1936 2001 (1st ed.) (French ed.) – Volume 6: Who’s Who in International Organizations, – Handbook of International Organizations: 1926, 1929, 1938 since 2007 (1st ed.) (English ed.) – CD-ROM version: Yearbook / Annuaire Plus, 1995 (1st – Répertoire des Organisations internationales / Handbook of ed.) – 2008 (15th ed.) International Organizations: 1921, 1923 (bi-lingual ed.) 2011 (48th ed.) – 2017 (54th ed.) 1948 (1st ed.) – 1950 (3rd ed.) Edited by the Union of International Associations (Brussels).
  • A History of and Challenges to Liberal Education

    A History of and Challenges to Liberal Education

    i CHAOS IN THE ACADEMY- A HISTORY OF AND CHALLENGES TO LIBERAL EDUCATION A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Liberal Studies By Larry Creech B.A., Georgetown University, 2009 M.A., Georgetown University, 2012 Georgetown University Washington, D.C. April, 2018 ii Copyright April 2018 by Larry W. Creech All Rights Reserved iii CHAOS IN THE ACADEMY- THE HISTORY OF AND CHALLENGES TO LIBERAL EDUCATION Larry W. Creech, M.A. DLS Chair: Ori Soltes, Ph.D. ABSTRACT For more than twenty-five hundred years of recorded history the acquisition of knowledge has increased in quantity and complexity. The method of communicating that knowledge has evolved in difficulty along with the vagaries of politics, social evolution and revolution, and other quirks of the human condition. The two constants throughout have been the chaos accompanying humankind’s quest for knowledge, and the method of communicating the knowledge. Nowhere is chaos more discernible than in the university, where every possible dynamic is in play, as well as the increasing though not unprecedented intervention and intrusion by government, corporations, and other outside entities. Chaos resulting in change is not a bad state of affairs in the university. As society evolves for better or worse, the university evolves as well. Chaos in the university is also an interdisciplinary theory of apparent randomness of complex systems of education where there are underlying patterns, feedback loops, repetition, redundancies, similarities, along with a reliance on scholars at the initial point of knowledge creation who are sensitive to the initial conditions and their possible consequences.
  • INFORMATION CRITICISM: WHERE IS IT? by JACK ANDERSEN

    INFORMATION CRITICISM: WHERE IS IT? by JACK ANDERSEN

    INFORMATION CRITICISM: WHERE IS IT? by JACK ANDERSEN oughly speaking, one may say that the practitioners of literary theory are the literary critics; that is, those reviewing and critiquing works of fiction. But where, one may ask, are the critics of the functionality and legitimacy of knowledge Rorganization systems? That is, for instance, bibliographies, classification systems, thesauri, encyclopedias and search engines – all systems that in some way or another mediate the recorded part of society and culture. Such knowledge organization systems are also the professional tools of librarians. Due to this fact, we should expect that librarians have a lot to say about the roles and doings of these systems in the mediation of society and culture, but it is hard within the public arena to trace and hear the critical voices of librarians grappling with knowledge organization systems. We are used to reading and hearing the voices of cultural critics, social critics and literary critics debating social and cultural issues – the kinds of criticism with well-established histories and adherents that exist in society. Jürgen Habermas (1996) argued, in his book on the structural transformation of the bourgeois public sphere, that art criticism, social criticism and literary criticism developed in public spaces like the coffee houses, saloons and tischgesellschaften and became established schools of thought in written genres such as journals and newspapers. They became organized in the sense that criticism developed particular forms of communication in order to talk and write about social, political and cultural issues in society. These particular modes of communication were maintained because of their appeal to and belief in rational discussion within the public sphere.
  • Analyzing the Role of Knowledge Organization in Scholarly Communication: an Inquiry Into the Intellectual Foundation of Knowledge Organization

    Analyzing the Role of Knowledge Organization in Scholarly Communication: an Inquiry Into the Intellectual Foundation of Knowledge Organization

    Analyzing the role of knowledge organization in scholarly communication: An inquiry into the intellectual foundation of knowledge organization Jack Andersen PhD thesis from Department of Information Studies Royal School of Library and Information Science, Copenhagen, Denmark Analyzing the role of knowledge organization in scholarly communication: An inquiry into the intellectual foundation of knowledge organization Jack Andersen PhD thesis from Department of Information Studies Royal School of Library and Information Science, Copenhagen, Denmark CIP – cataloguing in publication Andersen, Jack Analyzing the role of knowledge organization in scholarly communication: An inquiry into the intellectual foundation of knowledge organization / Jack Andersen. Copenhagen: Department of Information Studies, Royal School of Library and Information Science, 2004. x, 257 p. + appendixes. Available: http://www.db.dk/dbi/samling/phd_dk.htm ISBN: 87-7415-278-5 ISBN 87-7415-278-5 © Copyright Jack Andersen 2004 All rights reserved Vidensorganisationens rolle i videnskabelig kommunikation: En undersøgelse af vidensorganisationens teoretiske grundlag Jack Andersen Ph.d.-afhandling fra Institut for Informationsstudier Danmarks Biblioteksskole, København For Simon Peter and Iben In dreams begin responsibilities Delmore Schwartz Abstract In this dissertation I analyze the relationship between social organization and knowledge organization. This analysis is carried out on two levels. The first level consists of three chapters each examining particular perspectives of the relationship. First, in terms of an examination of how communication technologies have shaped forms of social organization, I argue how knowledge organization is constituted by social organization. Second, I further situate knowledge organization in light of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere and argue that this theory can be viewed as a fundamental model of knowledge organization.