A Morphometric and Meristic Comparison of the Gulf Grunion, Leuresthes Sardina (Jenkins and Evermann), and the California Grunion, Leuresthes Tenuis (Ayres)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A morphistic and meristic comparison of the Gulf grunion, Leuresthes sardina (Jenkins and Evermann), and the California grunion, Leuresthes tenuis (Ayres) Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Moffatt, Nancy Margaret, 1950- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 02/10/2021 10:26:42 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554681 A MORPHOMETRIC AND MERISTIC COMPARISON OF THE GULF GRUNION, LEURESTHES SARDINA (JENKINS AND EVERMANN), AND THE CALIFORNIA GRUNION, LEURESTHES TENUIS (AYRES) by Nancy Margaret Moffatt A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN BIOLOGY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 4 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial ful fillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowl edgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department of the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the inter ests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: //, APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown belowt DONALD A. THOMSON Associate Professor of Biology ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I express my sincere gratitude to my advisor, Donald A. Thomson, and the members of my committee, Elisabeth A e Stull and C® ¥«, Gaddis for their advice and guidance during the research and writing of this thesisa I also thank Carl L« Hubbs, Boyd W, Walker, Richard H«, ' Rosenblatt and Charles Ho Lowe, Jr» for their suggestions regarding my research* I wish to express my appreciation to my parents, Vo J* and 0 * M* Moffatt, the R * H « Dutcher family and others for their participation in grunion collecting expeditions* I acknowledge and thank the fish museum staffs of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, the University of California at Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Natural History Museum and the California Academy of Sciences for their loans of specimens* ill TABLE OF CONTENTS ^ Page LIST OF TABLES v LIST OP ILLUSTRATIONS, . , , , » . , * * . , , vi a b s t r a c t vii INTRODUCTION 09000000000000000 ® I METHODS AND MATERIALS® , , , ® , o , , , * , ® . 5 RESULTS 9000 0 0000000000000000 8 DISCUSSION 000O0OOSO 0000000900 2^ REFERENCES CITED * , , , ® * o , * , , * * , . , 34- iv LIST OF TABLES Table ' Page 1, Means, 95X confidence Intervals, sample sizes, ranges, t9 s and £ 9 s of all measure ments and proportions for L , sardlna and L o t enu1s 9 2, Means, 95$ confidence intervals, sample sizes, ranges, jt's and j>“s of all counts for L. sardlna and L . tenuis. a 15 3e Means, 95$ confidence intervals, sample sizes, ranges, t9s and jo's of all measure ments and proportions for the females and males of L . sardma oooooo.o.o.o 21 4 0 Means, 95$ confidence intervals, sample sizes, ranges, t8s and £ 9 s of all measure ments and proportions for the females and males of L @ t e n u i s 22 v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page la Geographical distribution and collection sites of L e sardina and L, tenuis ...... 3: 2. Ranges, means and 95^ confidence Intervals of the standard length (SL) for all specimens, females and males of L. sardina and L. tenuis 10 3. Ranges, means and 95X confidence intervals for the standard length (SL)/eye diameter (ED) for L. sardina and L. tenuis. ........ 11 4. Ranges, means and 95^ confidence intervals of the standard length (SL)/body width (W) and standard length (SL)/body depth (D) for L. sardina and L . tenuis. , . 12 5. Ranges, means and 95> confidence intervals of the standard length (SL)/pelvic fin (P?) and standard length (SL)/pectoral fin (P^) for L. sardina and L. tenuis. .......... 14 6. Ranges, means and 95% confidence intervals of the lateral scale row count for L, sardina and L @ tenuis ......o......... 17 7. Cycloid scales from the mid-lateral band of L . tenuis (above) and L . sardina (below). 1 8 . 8. Ranges, means and 95% confidence intervals of the standard length (SL)/head (H) for females and males of L. sardina and L. tenuis .... 23 9. Ranges, means and 95% confidence intervals of the standard length (SL)/body depth (D) for gravid and non-gravid females and males of L. sardina and L. tenuis ......... 24 10. Monthly mean sea surface temperatures at several locations in the geographical ranges of L . sardina (above) and L. tenuis (below) during their respective spawning seasons. .. 30 vi ABSTRACT Numerous qualitative and statistical similarities such as protractile premaxiliaries, weak and recurved teeth» fin insertion, coloration, air bladder development, fin ray formulae, gill raker size and number, head and interorbital proportions, confirm the congeneric relationship between the two species, Leuresthes sardina or the Gulf of California and Leuresthes tenuis of California,, Significant differ ences in the body proportions exist between the two species„ Leuresthes sardina is a longer, more slender fish with longer pelvic fins, and has larger and fewer body scales than Leuresthes tenuis which is more robust in the mid-body region, and has a greater eye diameter and longer pectoral fins o Morphemetrie differences also occur between the sexes of each species„ The females are longer in standard length and deeper in the mid-body region than the males in both species of Leuresthes» vii INTRODUCTION The remarkable California grunion, Leuresthes tenuis, which predictably spawns on the southern Cali fornia beaches every spring and summer (Walker 19^78 19^99 1952) was first described and named Atherinopsis tenuis by Ayres (i860)0 It was later assigned to the genus Leuresthes by Jordan and Gilbert (1880)„ In I896, Jordan and Evermann named and described a second species in this genus» L» crameri. They described it as being identical to La tenuis except with fewer lateral scale rows (La crameri 67, La tenuis 75) an<3- a narrower lateral band. It also ranged farther south than La tenuis (Punta Abreojos, Baja California Sur). Schultz (19^8), however, declared that Leuresthes tenuis and crameri were conspecific, despite the reduced scale row count of L » crameri 9 The taxonomy of the Gulf of California grunion, Leuresthes sardina, has been more confused than that of La tenuis a This species was described and named Atherlna sardina by Jenkins, and Evermann (1888), Evermann and Jenkins (1891) described what they thought was another species, Menidla clara, but which was later found to. be synonymous with A. sardina by Schultz (194-8) . Jordan and Evermann (I896), who changed Atherlna sardina to Menidia 2 sardlna were the first to suggest a close relationship between M 8 sardlna and Leuresthes, which has been supported by numerous studies since (Jordan and Hubbs 1919? Breder 19365 Schultz 194-8! Walker 1949, 1952). Breder (1936) erected a new genus, Hubbsiella and placed M 9 clara into that genus because of the greater number of lateral scale rows (54— 56, as compared to 36-4-6 in Menldia).. Schultz (194-8), in his taxonomic revision of six subfamilies of atherinid fishes, stated that the 4-5 scale rows reported by Jenkins and Evermann in the A. sardlna type specimen was a mistake (probably typographical), and that there were actually 54-» From this, and the similarities he found in the air bladders and vertebral hypophyses, he con cluded that Menidia clara was synonymous with M„ sardlna, Schultz accepted Breder,s (1936) genus, Hubbslella, but noted that both L. tenuis and H . sardlna were undoubtedly in the same phyletic line. Hubbslella is now generally recognized as being con generic with Leuresthes, but thpre have been no published studies confirming this relationship. The two species of grunion, L. tenuis and L» sardlna, are geographically isolated, Leuresthes tenuis ranges from Morro Bay, California to Bahia Magdalena in Baja California Sur (Fig, 1), Leuresthes sardlna ranges MORRO BAY SAN LUIS OBISPO. SANTA MONICA*> CABRILLO BE AC H TORREY PINES- LA JOLLA SHORES BAHIA DE TODOS SANTOS FO DE SANTA f=LARA PU PUNTA ABREOJOS ; . y GUAYMAS iAH IA CONCEPCION BAHIA MAGDALENA 1 L. sordino L. tenuis Figure 1. Geographical distribution and collection sites of L. sardina and L. tenuis 4 throughout the upper Gulf of California from Bahia Con cepcion, Baja California Sur and Guaymas, Sonora to the mouth of the Rio Colorado» The purpose of this study is to present a sta tistical comparison of morphometric and meristic character istics of L . sardina and L . tenuis, to clarify the heretofore confusion in their taxonomy and to confirm the close phylogenetic relationship of these two species0 METHODS AMD MATERIALS Morphometric measurements and counts were made on sexually mature adults of L . sardlna and L. tenuis collected during spawning runs Or which had ripening gonads„ The age of the grunion were not determined. Measurements were made with dividers, according to accepted convention (Hubbs and Lagler 1947). The body depth was measured as a vertical line through the anal opening, the body width as a line across the body just anterior to the pectoral fins and the anal-tail measurement as a line from the anal opening to the base of the tail.